Dexter Filkins has a terrific piece in the NY Times Magazine titled "Stanley McChrystal’s Long War". We are encouraged to see that McChrystal is engaging in community organizing - maybe he and Obama can swap stories and bond over that:
The Marines around McChrystal, including the local battalion commander, Lt. Col. Christian Cabaniss, looked surprised, even alarmed, when McChrystal removed his protective gear. But as the group walked the rutted streets into Garmsir’s bazaar, they began taking off their helmets, too.
“Who owns the land here?” McChrystal asked, peering up the street and into the shops. “Is it owned by the farmers or by landlords?”
It was the sort of question a sociologist, or an economist, would ask. No one offered an answer.
“If you owned 200 acres here, would you live on it, or would you live somewhere else?” McChrystal asked.
The entourage entered the bazaar. The Afghans sensed that an important American had arrived, and they began to gather in groups inside the stalls. Then the general stopped and turned.
“What do you need here?” McChrystal asked.
A translator turned the general’s words into Pashto.
“We need schools!” one Afghan called back. “Schools!”
“We’re working on that,” McChrystal said. “Those things take time.”
McChrystal walked some more, engaging another group of Afghans. He posed the same question.
“Security,” a man said. “We need security. Security first, then the other things will be possible.”
“That is what we are trying to do,” McChrystal said. “But it’s going to take time. Success takes time.”
The questions kept coming, and the answer was the same. After a couple of hours, McChrystal put on his helmet and flak jacket, boarded the Black Hawk and flew to another town.
I won't pretend that this is as challenging as getting the asbestos out of Altgeld Gardens (and I'll bet McChrystal is not fully up to speed on his Alinsky) but still - it's great to know our Commander-in-Chief brings a relevant skill set to the Afghanistan problem.
FOR ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE: Robert Pape, a poli-sci prof from the U of Chicago, argues for a long distance remote-controlled war, explaining that it is foreign troops that are providing the targets and creating the animosity in Afghanistan.
I thought the Taliban spent years fighting other Afghan groups without any US instigation at all and would be delighted to do so again.
Right because the Saudi General Intelligence
and ISI involvement, oh, that's not what he means at all, he's been quiet since the success of Petraeus's counterinsurgency strategy.
Posted by: narciso | October 15, 2009 at 01:32 PM
I'll bet McChrystal is not fully up to speed on his Alinsky
"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and
polarize itblow it to hell" - I think he is.Posted by: bgates | October 15, 2009 at 01:32 PM
Well, I don't want to claim theft but I believe days ago I said that McChrystal had a better chance selling his idea as community organizing rather than military strategy.
Posted by: clarice | October 15, 2009 at 01:34 PM
Well effective counterinsurgency relies on community contact, re; Galula, that why you need at least 40,000 additional troops.
Posted by: narciso | October 15, 2009 at 01:42 PM
I thought the Taliban spent years fighting other Afghan groups without any US instigation at all and would be delighted to do so again.
You thought correctly, TM. The difference between you and Professor Pape is that you are good at what you do.
Posted by: Terry Gain | October 15, 2009 at 01:52 PM
Terry wins today's Post of the Day!!
Posted by: clarice | October 15, 2009 at 01:56 PM
I am driven crazy by Ezra Klein's blog because people are constantly correcting him in the comments, and he very rarely acknowledges it.
Posted by: MayBee | October 15, 2009 at 02:08 PM
reality just get in the way of 'the narrative' whether it's the brave and conscientous (sic)jihadists, hoping to liberate his homeland, or the brave and conscientous bureaucrat bringing us the
'manna' of the public option, to us poor
trolls who suffer from 'false consciousness'
Posted by: narciso | October 15, 2009 at 02:14 PM
I meant proles, see how they seep in
Posted by: narciso | October 15, 2009 at 02:15 PM
Wait, MayBee, you read Ezra enough to know that "people are constantly correcting him in the comments, and he very rarely acknowledges it"?
This is the most shocking thing I've read since...
...well, since...
...since finding out that Jake Tapper watches Felicity enough to know what a disaster it was when she cut off her hair.
Posted by: hit and run | October 15, 2009 at 02:19 PM
Ha!
Posted by: MayBee | October 15, 2009 at 02:21 PM
And considering that Felicity's been off the air for eight years now. Did Ezra win
the crackerjack prize?
Posted by: narciso | October 15, 2009 at 02:29 PM
So now we can see all the avatars? I can only imagine what will happen next.
Posted by: Jane | October 15, 2009 at 02:42 PM
Where is the typepad exchange window? I like MayBee's doohickie better than mine.
Posted by: centralcal | October 15, 2009 at 02:45 PM
doohickie envy is an ugly thing, centralcal.
Posted by: MayBee | October 15, 2009 at 02:46 PM
Yeah well - "ugly thing" - that is how I feel about my doohickie/avatar/ whateveryacallit.
Posted by: centralcal | October 15, 2009 at 02:48 PM
"Who owns the land here?” McChrystal asked, peering up the street and into the shops. “Is it owned by the farmers or by landlords?"
Sound more like something Tony Rezko would say.
Posted by: PeterUK | October 15, 2009 at 02:51 PM
Hey, they're not unique; lucky me shares one with PuK.
=================================
Posted by: Oh, please, either TCO or Leo, too. | October 15, 2009 at 02:52 PM
Well DANG! I went over to old threads to look for sylvia's doohickie and lo and behold I discovered Sue's is the same as mine.
No wonder we fight over Dick Cheney first dibs! It is in our avatars!
Posted by: centralcal | October 15, 2009 at 02:54 PM
Yeah, I wonder if the avatars come by an algorithm. PuK waterboards the English language to extract otherwise unattainable insights from it, and I torture it.
===================================
Posted by: Ha, ha, ha. | October 15, 2009 at 03:00 PM
It's raining doohickies. narciso will now learn that my admiration of Sarah Palin equals his!
Posted by: Frau Morgenröte | October 15, 2009 at 03:01 PM
clarice's doohickie reminds me of her Shiva (creative mode) ability to cook, knit, write and think all at the same time. I noticed, however, in D.C. that she does *not* have eight arms.
Posted by: Frau Morgenröte | October 15, 2009 at 03:04 PM
I'm still trying to figure out most of the umlauted handles, pitchfork, claw worm, nightmare, squid and morning wheel?
Posted by: narciso | October 15, 2009 at 03:08 PM
Jane- it's like Christmas every day now in Typepadland.
Posted by: MayBee | October 15, 2009 at 03:11 PM
Mine's the sun and all its flare and magnetic properties affecting the earth besides the direct energy of its light.
========================================
Posted by: Like many things, we can put all the meaning in them we like. | October 15, 2009 at 03:11 PM
Well, frau, it's been cold and rainy for two days now and my cat and I have mostly been slacking off--all right I'm doing a little knitting and bread backing and the cat's winning the snoozearama but there we are.
Posted by: clarice | October 15, 2009 at 03:23 PM
I tried posting with embedded images of all 20 icons, but it swallowed my post.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | October 15, 2009 at 03:40 PM
if you go back in Afghan history or even in Pakistan today, one of the biggest issues is land disputes. The local landowners and even the magnates are regularly dispossessing the farmers. This fuels a lot of the vendettas that have made both countries sometimes ungovernable. There is a tremendous amount of injustice, and the graft keeps the system oiled.
The Taliban have actually made this one of their more successful platforms. Rough justice at a huge price, but the farmers know they have a venue to fight back.
Posted by: matt | October 15, 2009 at 03:46 PM
Dave:
I discovered that 1 graphic = 2 links out of the 4 link max. You could paste them all into a single image -- or maybe into one of those little hand held plastic puzzle games where you have to slide the numbers around. Or not.
Posted by: JM Hanes | October 15, 2009 at 03:53 PM
We seem to have conflicting views here:
In days past, Leftist critics told us that our enemies despised us because we were too "gutless" to confront them on the ground, in direct combat, and too quick to resort to the use of "long distance remote- controlled weapons" and superior technology.
Now, these same critics argue that our presence on the ground, in direct combat, is what is creating the animosity.
If this is so, what explains the fact that 20-30,000+ jihadists flocked to Afghanistan to train in Bin Laden's terror camps in the 1990's, at the height of the Pax Clintona "holiday from history"?
Posted by: fdcol63 | October 15, 2009 at 04:00 PM
Dave, I don't believe I gave you permission to reprint my thingamabob.
Posted by: MayBee | October 15, 2009 at 04:12 PM
narciso - Morgenröte or Morgenrot mean Dawn which is my actual name. I used Morgenröte so JOMers wouldn't think I was calling myself "morning rot"!
clarice - sounds like perfect weather for keeping up on slacking skills. As a fellow tricoteuse (École Madame Defarge), I took two projects on our recent trip, but spent most of my idle time trying to get internet access in a rainforest and whimpering when I couldn't.
Posted by: Frau Morgenröte | October 15, 2009 at 04:13 PM
And it came to be known as the Doohickie-Thingamabob Conflict...
I hate to think what will happen if Mark Steyn shows *his* doohickie around here.
Posted by: Frau Morgenröte | October 15, 2009 at 04:17 PM
It's easier to knit on an airplane than it is in a kayak, frau morgenrote.
Posted by: clarice | October 15, 2009 at 04:20 PM
central, I like yours (and Sue's) doohickie best! It reminds me of some placemats we had in the 70's. No really, from me that's a compliment. :)
Posted by: Porchlight | October 15, 2009 at 04:25 PM
clarice:
It's easier to knit on an airplane than it is in a kayak, frau morgenrote.
I don't know, I think I'll need to hear it from Daddy.
What, you're coming in for landing and you control the throttle with one knee and the yoke with another?
Posted by: hit and run | October 15, 2009 at 04:30 PM
This is the first time I have seen everyone's "doohickie" on a thread. Usually, its just mine that comes up. Did Tom have to pay Typepad extra for this cuteness?
Clarice, you don't own a Saturn do you?
Posted by: Jack is Back! | October 15, 2009 at 04:33 PM
Dave,
I really can't tell you how shocked I am that you would fool around with MayBee's thingamabob without permission. I believe a full report of the incident is in order.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | October 15, 2009 at 04:38 PM
No Saturn, just an old reliable Toyota that has so few miles on it, parking lot attendants swoon and beg me to sell it to them and my dealer keeps asking if I played with the odometer when I bring it in for tuneups.
Posted by: clarice | October 15, 2009 at 04:41 PM
Stop looking at my doohickie!
Posted by: Sue | October 15, 2009 at 04:42 PM
sbw looks left to see his Doohickie-Thingamabob.
Posted by: sbw | October 15, 2009 at 04:45 PM
((central, I like yours (and Sue's) doohickie best!))
Alright Porchlight, I'm feeling doohickie envy.
Posted by: Janet | October 15, 2009 at 04:55 PM
Jack, what makes you think you have the only doohickie that comes up?
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 15, 2009 at 05:01 PM
Have you all seen this headline that ran on an AP article (in the Weekly Standard) in June 2004?
Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate
Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.
The allegations that horrified fellow Republicans and caused his once-promising candidacy to implode in four short days have given Obama a clear lead as Republicans struggled to fetch an alternative.
Ryan’s campaign began to crumble on Monday following the release of embarrassing records from his divorce. In the records, his ex-wife, Boston Public actress Jeri Ryan, said her former husband took her to kinky sex clubs in Paris, New York and New Orleans.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 15, 2009 at 05:09 PM
Some of them look like they were made using a Spirograph. Love!
Posted by: MayBee | October 15, 2009 at 05:13 PM
Now this has gotta hurt:
Gallup has Obama at 56% to $40% right now, although his job approval stands at 52%.
Posted by: JM Hanes | October 15, 2009 at 05:16 PM
It's the Sunday Standard, not the Weekly Standard and I never heard of it.
Posted by: clarice | October 15, 2009 at 05:18 PM
And that's with Gallup's secret special sauce,JMH.
Posted by: clarice | October 15, 2009 at 05:19 PM
Sara:
Have you all seen this headline that ran on an AP article (in the Weekly Standard) in June 2004?
It's the East African Standard, a Kenyan publication. And the --AP does not, I think refer to the Associated Press.
Posted by: hit and run | October 15, 2009 at 05:24 PM
Ah, thanks. My bad. Although interesting, nonetheless. No?
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 15, 2009 at 05:42 PM
I believe that outfit(AP, not the real AP) was pimping that story thru the campaign and was apparently a fraudulent site.
Posted by: clarice | October 15, 2009 at 05:47 PM
Couldn't be plainer,AP,Absolute Truth,African President.
Posted by: PeterUK | October 15, 2009 at 05:54 PM
I think it was African Press actually.
Posted by: clarice | October 15, 2009 at 05:58 PM
Interesting, definitely.
Posted by: hit and run | October 15, 2009 at 06:13 PM
Speaking of the AP, I was interested to see Jennifer Loven on Bret Baier's all stars panel last night. Don't know whether it's intended or not, but if he can sit the AP Washington bureau folks down at that table one by one for a week or so each, maybe actually having to entertain a serious alternative viewpoint would have a salutary effect on them.
I sure wish they'd haul Carol Leonnig in there -- she's the staff reporter who consistently wrote some of the most factually challenged pieces on the Libby trial at the WaPo. In fact, it was so bad, that after the first few skewed observations in a column, I hardly needed to check the byline to see who wrote it. I remain surprised that she's still working there, which will give you an idea of just how slanted a "straight news" reporter I think she is.
Posted by: JM Hanes | October 15, 2009 at 07:04 PM
Man, I am so bummed about my doohickey. I like everybody else's better than mine.
(pout. flounce. hrrummmph.)
Posted by: cathyf | October 15, 2009 at 07:40 PM
cathy, you can make up whatever email address you want in there and ...well... play with your doohickey.
Posted by: hit and run | October 15, 2009 at 08:16 PM
I think if we bomb the Taliban with these mind twisting avatars, they will surrender. Honestly, I can't stand these little optical illusions next to each post. It's like George Costanza coming out of the can shirtless after staring at one of those 3-D posters.
Yo, JM, dump these avatars now...or I'm voting straight Dem ticket next election!!!
Posted by: Cant Standya | October 15, 2009 at 09:31 PM
Yo, JOMers. What is it with all these little pics?
Posted by: verner | October 15, 2009 at 11:06 PM
We think it might be a newly sprung typepad feature no one seems to have asked for. Unlike the ability to click on a post and have it appear so we don't all get carpal tunnel syndrome which we do want back.
Posted by: clarice | October 15, 2009 at 11:21 PM
Per Newsbusters, Huff Po has retracted the Rush "quotes" So sort of has CNN's Sanchez and Anderson Cooper. MSNBC is courting bankruptcy by so far failing to retract.
Posted by: clarice | October 15, 2009 at 11:25 PM
This is basic counterinsurgency. Win the hearts and minds. It was developed in the Philippines over a hundred years ago. Discussed in Imperial Grunts by Robert D. . Kaplan. It was mocked during the Vietnam War, but it works. People want safety, health, a future for their kids and a way to make a living. If they have those, they'll fight to defend them.
Posted by: AST | October 16, 2009 at 02:23 AM