To whom can America turn in these troubled times, as Hope and Change appear to be foundering? We can turn to Obama for answers!
Having explained to us that Fox News cannot be trusted, Obama has taken the additional and important step of endorsing certain pundits, opinion leaders, and "journalists" as President Approved. Who is on the honor roll:
Here's a curious turn in the White House vs. Fox News fight.
On Monday, MSNBC's Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow were among several people who attended an off-the-record briefing with Pres. Obama at the White House. Sources tell us other attendees at the two-and-a-half hour chat included Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post, Maureen Dowd of the New York Times, Gwen Ifill of PBS and Gloria Borger of CNN. Perhaps not surprisingly, no one from Fox News was in the room.
...Update: The White House has sent TVNewser the complete list of those who attended the off-the-record briefing Monday: Eugene Robinson, E.J. Dionne, Ron Brownstein, John Dickerson, Rachel Maddow, Frank Rich, Jerry Seib, Maureen Dowd, Keith Olbermann, Bob Herbert, Gloria Borger, and Gwen Ifill. Several members of the staff also attended.
There you have it. Now we know where to look for President Approved Punditry.
It must have been exciting for Ron Brownstein to meet heavy journalistic talents like Maddow and Olbermann.
Go read Borger's journalistic efforts after the meeting. She is a good stenographer.
Posted by: Sue | October 22, 2009 at 11:47 AM
"Sick puppies"
--GHWB.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | October 22, 2009 at 11:55 AM
Zero is proving that he is not only an incompetent, bumbling buffoon with a low IQ. He is also proving that his vaunted political skills are nearly non-existent. He can't deal with criticism. He doesn't know how to push his own agenda. His staff doesn't know how to influence Congress. And no one in the WH even seems to have a clue how the president is supposed to interact with the media.
These guys remind me of Michigan football in the 70s. They only have one play: attack their opponent; demonize the messenger. At some point you have to actually make an argument. They have no good arguments, and that's why the administration is a complete failure after only nine months. If Zero thinks attacking Fox News and blaming George Bush for his problems is a successful strategy, he is in for a brutally sobering education.
Posted by: Fresh Air | October 22, 2009 at 12:04 PM
2.5 hours with these "journalists". .25 of an hour with the commander in Afghanistan.
Posted by: Sue | October 22, 2009 at 12:09 PM
he is in for a brutally sobering education
What was that Star Trek line?
Captain--your logic is impeccable--we are in grave danger!!
Happy Birthday Narciso:-)
Posted by: glasater | October 22, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Dickerson must be embarrassed to have been included with those clowns.
Did anyone get a snap of Dionne kissing the hem of Obama's jacket?
Posted by: clarice | October 22, 2009 at 12:12 PM
President Approved Punditry.
PAP.
That's no joke brother...
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM
round up the usual suspects
Posted by: Inspector Renault | October 22, 2009 at 12:16 PM
NYTimes lays off a hundred newsroom workers. Newsday, a suburban liberal rag, will charge $260 for access to its mediocre website.
MSM is in its death throes, but won't go down easy.
Posted by: peter | October 22, 2009 at 12:16 PM
Gwen Ifill? Say it ain't so!
Posted by: Extraneus | October 22, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Thanks glasater, and cathyf, from the
previous thread. Gwen, how 'the age of
Obama' working out for you.
Posted by: narciso | October 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM
unbelievable! george w. bush would NEVER have done something like this.
Posted by: grampa | October 22, 2009 at 12:31 PM
clarice is featured on Instapundit! congrats!
Posted by: matt | October 22, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Ah? . . . Did they deliver pizza before they dropped to their knees?
Posted by: Sunzeneise | October 22, 2009 at 12:35 PM
Ah, Gwen Ifill. I remember how my mom wouldn't admit that the author of "Politics in the Age of Obama: How Black Democrats Can Redeem This Stinking Hellhole of a Country" wasn't a neutral moderator for the VP debate. (Hey, the book wasn't out yet - it might have been a hit piece for all we knew, mom said.)
Speaking of hit pieces, I wonder how Maddow will deal with the rest of the Reds, since she's the only member of l'affaire rouge to get called up for the big meeting.
Speaking of l'affaire rouge, I saw this comment:
It should not have come as a surprise to former Alaska governor Sarah Palin and her publisher that somebody would take the title of her upcoming memoir, flip two letters and come up with a parody.
That's from the website of National Public Radio, porn.rg.
Posted by: bgates | October 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM
I think it is a GREAT idea to start getting Ifill prepared to serve as an impartial moderator for the next round of presidential debates.
Posted by: Terry M. Sater | October 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM
LOL @ inviting Frank Rich; when in doubt call for the theater critic turned political huckster. Same with Keefums only substitute sports. MoDo had to be included so that she doesn't make some snarky comments about his ginormous ears. Iowahawk must be getting nervous at reality co-opting his satire.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM
So this is the "received their pat on the head" crowd? Except for E.J. Dionne clogging up some column inches in my local paper, I don't have much truck with any of 'em. Thank Goodness.
Posted by: LTC John | October 22, 2009 at 12:41 PM
I can't wait until 2012, when the grown-ups can take over, and let the children sit again on the sidelines and make up rhyming chants.
Posted by: Stonemeister | October 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Hope Gibbs brought a box of tissues.
Ah? . . . Did they deliver pizza before they dropped to their knees? - Sunzeneise
Posted by: Chuck, Sacramento | October 22, 2009 at 12:44 PM
I have always suspected Gerry(Jerry?) Seib of The Wall Street Journal of being liberal.
Posted by: bolitha | October 22, 2009 at 12:44 PM
Hahahahahahahahaha!!!!
Meanwhile obongo states how libs think for themselves while the right are the lemmings
Jimmy carter has to be pleased he no longer occupies the basement
Posted by: P bartels | October 22, 2009 at 12:45 PM
And there you have it.
Obama complete stable of whores.
Posted by: John Galt | October 22, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Seib is the only one with a trace of sanity in that group, speaking of insanity, the honorable Senator from the state of New York, aspires to the height ofcluelessness, no the other one, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | October 22, 2009 at 12:46 PM
Zero is proving that he is not only an incompetent, bumbling buffoon with a low IQ. He is also proving that his vaunted political skills are nearly non-existent. He can't deal with criticism. He doesn't know how to push his own agenda. His staff doesn't know how to influence Congress. And no one in the WH even seems to have a clue how the president is supposed to interact with the media.
I don't think that's quite fair — I'm sure he has a reasonably high IQ.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 22, 2009 at 12:47 PM
No Crissy Matthews?
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:XzL5dawAS8tAjM:http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d20/simonthedude/chrismatthews.jpg>
I wonder if his leg felt sad.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | October 22, 2009 at 12:47 PM
In the overall scheme of things, these WH "approved" script readers and/or plagiarists (e.g. M. Dowd)don't have a collective monthly audience to match Fox News' or Rush L's individual hourly audience.
Posted by: alwyr | October 22, 2009 at 12:48 PM
AKA, Obama's Poodles.
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | October 22, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Did anyone get a snap of Dionne kissing the hem of Obama's jacket?
Bad camera angle. That wasn't his jacket.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 22, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Oh god dammit.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 22, 2009 at 12:49 PM
I think it is a GREAT idea to start getting Ifill prepared to serve as an impartial moderator for the next round of presidential debates.
It does give a useful list of which of these turkeys are documented as in the tank.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 22, 2009 at 12:51 PM
Fresh Air: "If Zero thinks attacking Fox News and blaming George Bush for his problems is a successful strategy, he is in for a brutally sobering education."
And the nation is going to pay the tuition. No scholarship, just debts, debts, debts.
Look for a hair pulling match the next time Olbermann and Matthews are in the same studio.
But what did any JOMer expect from The Once?
Posted by: Gregory Koster | October 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM
NOW WE KNOW WHO THE GENERALS ARE IN THE "WAR AGAINST FOX".
2 1/2 hours for the Commissioning Ceremony at the White House. From Lieutenant to General in one fell swoop. How proud FLOTUS
must be now!!
MAKE SURE YOU SALUTE THEM PROPERLY.
Posted by: Geez Louise | October 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Hah, I fixed it.
Here's the trick: include the end-italics tag FIRST THING in the comment. Like this:
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Somebody has to come up with a tasteful, graphic Presidential Approved Punditry (PAP) "Seal of Approval" that we can slap on future efforts by the enlightened. It would be just like "Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval" or "The Comics Code." That way we could report unapproved punditry to the proper authorities.
"Oh Lead Us Forward, Dear Helmsman!!!"
Posted by: Mike Huggins | October 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Charlie (Colorado), a shorter list would be of jwhorenalists not in the tank.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | October 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Thanks Matt, looking at it further, it's not an administration 'I'm a doctor not a. . ."It's a royal court, Hillary is supposed to be running foreign policy
, but she's not. Holbrooke is supposed
to be running Afghanistan, but Kerry is doing it. Jones, they just told him to sit
there, and come out every once in a while, like the troll under the bridge, Rhodes and McDonough run that shop. Gibbs, the Peter
Griffith lookalike, is the jester, no one
pays attention to him. What a way to run a railroad, or don't as the case may be
Posted by: narciso | October 22, 2009 at 12:55 PM
CharlieCO: "I don't think that's quite fair — I'm sure he has a reasonably high IQ."
Cunning is not equal to intelligence. I admit, it is dismaying to see all this adulation, but that's proof of Mencken's notion of solvency based on underestimating the intelligence of the American people.
Posted by: Gregory Koster | October 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Right, but now we have an actual list from the WH of journalists known to be on the Approved List.
If Ifill moderates another one of the debates, the first answer to the first question by a Republican should be "Ms Ifill, I just want to recall that when the Obama Administration had a meeting for so-called journalists who were known to be strongly sympathetic, you were included, Now, could you repeat the question?"
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM
What a mark of shame for Brownstein and Seib to be lumped in with the overt propagandists.
Posted by: E, O'Neal | October 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Cunning is not equal to intelligence
Okay, that joke didn't work.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 22, 2009 at 01:00 PM
When Obama was elected, I knew it would be terrible, as did all of you other posters. But this is so far beyond what I pictured there are no words. This administration is pathetic. As for the "mainstream media", what a bunch of lapdogs!
Posted by: Steve from WIsconsin | October 22, 2009 at 01:01 PM
This all puts in the mind of the episodes of the Blackadder series, specially the 13th
and 18th century additions, with all this talk of 'cunning plans'
Posted by: narciso | October 22, 2009 at 01:03 PM
Meh. Who cares? I'm a died-in-the-wool conservative, and think it's outrageous that the WH would DISS a news organ; but who cares if they have their favorites? Bush called all the talk radio guys in a couple of times -- I thought that was fine, and so is this.
But trying to strongarm a news network, as they are doing to Fox, is another matter. I think that's where we should concentrate fire.
Posted by: RegularJoe | October 22, 2009 at 01:06 PM
You didn't fix it on my computer Charlie - sheesh that is like 5 in a row. Sit in the corner for a while, will you?
That made me laugh.
Posted by: Jane | October 22, 2009 at 01:08 PM
Ha- clarice! I thought the same thing about Dickerson. I actually had just tweeted him to ask if he was offended.
Posted by: MayBee | October 22, 2009 at 01:08 PM
Eugene Robinson... oh, for a second I thought you meant Eugene Debs.
Posted by: Yephora | October 22, 2009 at 01:10 PM
OT, CH's comment from a few thread ago:
(do domestic journo-idiots like Charlie Gibson even know what the Anglican Church is?)
They still aren't clear on "Episcopal" and "Episcopalian," leading to such cacophonies as "the Episcopalian Church" and "Episcopalian priests."
Posted by: Elliott | October 22, 2009 at 01:11 PM
So, I suppose you guys were all equally outraged by the Pentagon sockpuppets, prepackaged news, paying off of columnists, and mock press conferences, etc.
Posted by: AJB | October 22, 2009 at 01:11 PM
You didn't fix it on my computer Charlie
What browser and OS?
My computer is in a corner already. So there.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 22, 2009 at 01:15 PM
RJ--
I don't think we care about this per se, but we do find it a useful data point. Eighteen percent of Americans think the MSM fairly presents all points of view. Why they want to drive that down to 10 percent with stunts like this, I don't know.
Charlie--
Actually, I don't think he has a fairly high IQ. I think he is of slightly above average intelligence at best, and has glided on the rails of affirmative action for nearly 40 years. Zero's basically a slacker and pseudo-intellectual. Your prototypical pony-tailed social studies teacher is probably his ceiling in terms of political intelligence. If he has any more, he's sure been keeping his light under a basket.
Posted by: Fresh Air | October 22, 2009 at 01:16 PM
So, I suppose you guys were all equally outraged by the Pentagon sockpuppets, prepackaged news, paying off of columnists, and mock press conferences, etc.
No, no, yes, no.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 22, 2009 at 01:16 PM
test
Posted by: clarice | October 22, 2009 at 01:18 PM
He's a pied piper. He's not that bright, but he is indoctrinated, and basically I think he is just trying to see how much he can get away with. Other people are telling him how to go about it.
WE may or may not win this war, but we sure as hell aren't going to stop fighting.
Anyone hear any news on the net neutrality vote?
Posted by: Jane | October 22, 2009 at 01:19 PM
I thought Obama was going to be "different" and now even Bush haters have to admit he is more of the same.............only, in my opinion, much worse.
Posted by: Carl | October 22, 2009 at 01:21 PM
Actually, I don't think he has a fairly high IQ.
Well, above average would be fairly high — by definition, that puts him above more than half the population. But he shows every outward sign of a high IQ: large vocabulary, facile speaker. Doesn't show much sign of intellectual rigour or deep thought, but attend a single Mensa meeting and it becomes obvious tose don't necessarily go together.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 22, 2009 at 01:21 PM
AJB- I am not outraged. Obama can meet off the record with whomever he wants.
He can also try to sell the idea that he is horrified by the opinionated Fox news, so much so that other networks should ignore them.
He just can't look dignified while trying to do both in the same week.
Posted by: MayBee | October 22, 2009 at 01:23 PM
Jane,
"The FCC voted Thursday to open a rulemaking process and begin receiving comments on a proposal to create new net neutrality rules following a contentious debate on whether new regulations are needed.
The FCC is still months away from voting on the final regulations, but the rules, as proposed, would allow Web users to run the legal applications and access the legal Web sites of their choice, while prohibiting broadband providers from selectively blocking or slowing Web content. Providers could use "reasonable" network management to reduce congestion and maintain quality of service, but the rules would require them to be transparent with consumers about their efforts."
LUN
Posted by: clarice | October 22, 2009 at 01:23 PM
I'm gonna send them all copies of Sarah's book.
And call 911 for an ambulance to reach them after their heart attacks.
What a bunch of complete sycophantic hacks.
Posted by: Sapwolf | October 22, 2009 at 01:25 PM
I'm sure Baghdad Bob Gibbs is doing follow-up on the inductees into the Hall of Robe-Kissing Hemline Slaves. See if they passed the quiz or need remedial brainwashing.
Posted by: daveinboca | October 22, 2009 at 01:27 PM
Hey, sapwolf found your way here, huh, my first original blog
Posted by: narciso | October 22, 2009 at 01:28 PM
If Obama was smarter than Bush, we'd have seen his SAT grades by now.
Posted by: Extraneus | October 22, 2009 at 01:31 PM
What's with this fascination with choirs that the Obama's have? First it was the kids in New Jersey singing his praises, mmmm, mmmm, mmmm. Now he has choir practice at the WH with the full adult variety.
I wonder if they will enter into the Battle of The Choirs that Nick Lachey last won?
Posted by: Jack is Back! | October 22, 2009 at 01:39 PM
Just when you think you have heard or seen it all Obama does this. My take is he doesn't know how to handle the negative blowback from declaring war on Fox news so he is looking for pointers from his Greek chorus.
Posted by: maryrose | October 22, 2009 at 01:42 PM
this clown needs to be impeached before it,s to late.
Posted by: frank cooper | October 22, 2009 at 01:42 PM
Rush played a new one of some 3rd-graders from February earlier, Jack. It even had cowbell.
Posted by: Extraneus | October 22, 2009 at 01:43 PM
Why do we need 'net neutrality' again, and what's neutral about anything this crew comes up with.
Posted by: narciso | October 22, 2009 at 01:45 PM
"reasonable"
Therein lies the rub.
Posted by: Jane | October 22, 2009 at 01:46 PM
I think he is of slightly above average intelligence at best, and has glided on the rails of affirmative action for nearly 40 years. Zero's basically a slacker and pseudo-intellectual. Your prototypical pony-tailed social studies teacher is probably his ceiling in terms of political intelligence. If he has any more, he's sure been keeping his light under a basket.
Remember what a laugh it was when it was revealed that Gore's SAT scores, for all of his smarminess, were statistically a dead heat with those of W's? essentially 1200.
I'm guessing that Obama's were about a hundred points lower.
Posted by: peter | October 22, 2009 at 01:48 PM
I wanna know what his LSAT's were - since that is one of the few tests in my life that I scored in the 99 percentile.
Posted by: Jane | October 22, 2009 at 01:50 PM
I wish Obama would wage war against the Taliban and al Qaeda as ruthlessly and single-mindedly as his war against Fox News, Rush, Hannity, Beck, the Chamber of Commerce and the health insurers. Fat chance! He plans to use the Democrat media to de-legitimize and to silence anyone who stands in his way, just like his leftist dictator role models have done.
Posted by: E, O'Neal | October 22, 2009 at 01:52 PM
This is the same Ron Brownstein who is married to Eileen McMenamin, the previous campaign communications director for John McCain?
Posted by: PattyAnn | October 22, 2009 at 01:54 PM
Jane--
His LSATs, just like his grades and his Columbia thesis, were so good they have to be kept secret.
Posted by: Fresh Air | October 22, 2009 at 01:54 PM
Posted by: AJB | October 22, 2009 at 01:56 PM
After you put Keith Olbermann's overinflated ego into any room, just how could any one else fit ?
Posted by: Neo | October 22, 2009 at 01:59 PM
You got in the 99th percentile! Wow. I still can't figure out half the questions.
Let's assume that one can with work game the SATs and LSATs..Let's see the courses he took and the grades he got. I think he's a slick operator who mostly did pass/fail independent studies with like minded lefty profs like Gates.
Posted by: clarice | October 22, 2009 at 01:59 PM
"But he shows every outward sign of a high IQ: large vocabulary, facile speaker."
That would be TOTUS, right? His off the cuff remarks exhibting his grasp of the profit to earnings ratio make it fairly clear (in all 57 states) that he may well be very facile in reading others words but we have very little evidence of any ability to articulate coherent thought without significant assistance.
His natural intelligence certainly appears higher than that exhibited by FLATULUS in her Princeton scribblings but that is a rather low bar. I sincerely doubt that we will ever see any firm evidence from which an actual conclusion might be drawn.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | October 22, 2009 at 02:00 PM
Eileen McMenamin and Ronald Brownstein, yes she worked for McCaind LUN
Posted by: Neo | October 22, 2009 at 02:01 PM
If Obama had a high IQ he would be handing out badges and T-shirts with it on.
"Hmmm,hmmm,hmmm Barack 199 Obama."
Posted by: PeterUK | October 22, 2009 at 02:01 PM
No Mahr or Stewart?
Afterall he wants the neatest brainest
Posted by: P bartels | October 22, 2009 at 02:01 PM
You got in the 99th percentile! Wow. I still can't figure out half the questions.
Yup and I was so prepared I could even tell which questions were experimental.
Now, I bet I passed the bar exam by the skin of my teeth - we don't get actual results here. I was never so worried about anything in my life. I'd just borrowed more money than I could ever hope to pay back (it took me 18 years) and one test determined whether it was all for naught.
The day it was scheduled to arrive, I took the day off. I finally tracked down the mailman about 1:00 PM and actually drove him to his pick-up spot because as some have suggested, patience is not my long suit.
I remember it like it was yesterday.
Posted by: Jane | October 22, 2009 at 02:11 PM
(Note how I cleverly don't mention that Clinton is the one who started doing all the things I listed, but blamed on Bush -- just like "free speech zones" and "extraordinary rendition". I'm such a clever troll!)
Posted by: AJB | October 22, 2009 at 02:12 PM
Mickey Kaus asks ...
Posted by: Neo | October 22, 2009 at 02:16 PM
HAPPY BIRTHDAY NARCISO!!!!!!!!
Obama's grades, IQ, family tree, true friends are all below GWB's or he would be shouting them from the teleprompter or have his soul=brother Keith sneak it in.
It's fun to snicker at this handful of creeps that are dictating policy, but we all better sign up to be acorn-like for the next election and drive at least 100 sensible people to the voting booth in '10 and '12.
How about writing a Cliff Notes of Obama's book, Elliott or Clarice or Rick or CharlieCo, and release it like the lowbrows are doing to Sarah's book. I would buy it!! Or we could all submit a "why his dreams of his Father" are ruining our lives" chapter!
Posted by: glenda | October 22, 2009 at 02:21 PM
Thanks glenda, but who would bite the bullet and go through that entire tome. Yes we know Gore was unimpressive and Kerry was
slightly worse, but they all carrying that meaning patois, that makes all the academics
tingle
Posted by: narciso | October 22, 2009 at 02:28 PM
Happy Birthday, Narciso. Hope you have a wonderful celebration!!
Posted by: bad | October 22, 2009 at 02:35 PM
Gerald Seib is an Obama lover. Every analysis that appears in the WSJ is favorable to him. Even when he discusses some negative thing happening, he slants it optimistically and deflects most of the blame to other, seldom to Obama. It is glaringly obvious.
Posted by: bio mom | October 22, 2009 at 02:37 PM
Thanks, bad, how are you doing.
Posted by: narciso | October 22, 2009 at 02:40 PM
I'd love to read the talking points paper they were handed.....and what was in the goody bags?
Posted by: J | October 22, 2009 at 02:42 PM
I wanna know what his LSAT's were - since that is one of the few tests in my life that I scored in the 99 percentile.
Not bad at all, Jane, but I guess that means you didn't get any points from the bonus questions.
Posted by: PaulL | October 22, 2009 at 02:44 PM
I always found bar exams simple-I figured out early on that the examiners had to grade a lot of papers and wanted you to THINK SHALLOW.Show you could identify the issue, pick one side of it though briefly acknowledging and dismissing the countervailing opinion and write a plausible argument in support of your view.
Never fails.
Posted by: clarice | October 22, 2009 at 02:44 PM
Exactly how many bar exams have you taken, Clarice?
Posted by: PaulL | October 22, 2009 at 02:46 PM
Glenda,
How's this?
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | October 22, 2009 at 02:46 PM
Jane, you beat me by one percentile.
And, I'll have you know, I've been rejected by some of the finest universities in the country!
Posted by: sbw | October 22, 2009 at 02:47 PM
Happy Birthday Narciso!. Congrats to all on high scores for the LSAT and bar exams. If Obama had any academic achievement worth touting believe me we would have heard about it. .
Posted by: maryrose | October 22, 2009 at 02:52 PM
"and what was in the goody bags?"
Same as in the Clinton days - kneepads, chapstick, a three year supply of Valtrex and crayons and a coloring book for the ride home.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | October 22, 2009 at 02:55 PM
Two, Paul. And I've been admitted to a third state as well.
Posted by: clarice | October 22, 2009 at 02:55 PM
That would be Wisconsin, D.C, and where else
Posted by: narciso | October 22, 2009 at 03:02 PM
Clarice.
A kind of a bar crawl?
Posted by: PeterUK | October 22, 2009 at 03:05 PM
Texas Instruments is building a new plant in the Dallas area. It's expected to employ one thousand people.
GREEN SHOOTS
GREEN SHOOTS
Posted by: bad | October 22, 2009 at 03:05 PM