In a poll of adults, not likely voters, Gallup finds that the public is 'still leaning" against the current proposed health care bills.
As a straw in the wind, the Times ran a guest piece in their Week In Review explaining to libs that the current bills include a "public option" so watered down that surrendering it altogether won't be a fatal blow to current liberal fantasies.
Hah! I enjoy the poignant presumption that the debate is really about expanding access to health care. Politically, the Dem strategy is to create a new middle class entitlement, however watered down, and new public sector jobs. They can then spend the next few decades "fixing" it by expanding it, buoyed by the belief that no government program ever dies.
Sorry for the repost from the other thread, but this seems highly relevant right here:
40 Percent of Democrats Saying They're Unlikely to Vote, or Certain to Not Vote in 2010?
Posted by: anduril | November 30, 2009 at 10:28 AM
It cannot fade far enough or fast enough to suit me.
Posted by: clarice | November 30, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Happy Birthday week, Clarice, and welcome home.
The news in DC you missed amounted to:
1) What AGW scandal? Full speed ahead.
and
2) What loss of Healthcare support? The Senate might act before year end.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 30, 2009 at 10:33 AM
Not sure if it's the looming health care failure, but Obama's done something to upset somebody in the press - Yahoo is headlining 7 stories Obama doesn't want told. I just glanced at it, I think they were
-he's a Chicago machine pol
-he doesn't much like America
-he lets Harry and Nancy run the country
-he's a wimp
-no fiscal discipline
-no empathy
-tremendous vanity and arrogance
-no sense of what it means to be an American
-a friend to tyrants and a tyrant to friends
-didn't write his books
-Nobel was a joke
-he's an insulting little punk
-he's racially divisive
-spends public money on himself and his parties and plays golf while millions go without work
-horrible harridan of a wife
-dithers over war plans
-faked Christian beliefs
-not actually very bright
Was that seven? I may have added a few.
Posted by: bgates | November 30, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Ras still at -14, now 12 days in a row (excluding non-polling days) of double-digit negatives.
Only six days in the last month of single-digit negatives.
Posted by: PD | November 30, 2009 at 10:42 AM
I'm not that good at math, bgates, but I think you did add a few.
O.L., you are cynical--probably right but still cynical. CRU has finally even lost the Atlantic's Crook.
http://clivecrook.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/11/more_on_climategate.php
Posted by: clarice | November 30, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Speaking of crooks, I forgot
-he's a crook
-most of his friends are crooks
-he treats war criminals like common thieves
-he talks a lot about grand ethical reforms he wants to put in place and then ignores his own rules
-he talks about respecting science, but wants to use junk science to impose a global bureaucracy
-he attempts to personally destroy his opposition
Add your own!
Posted by: bgates | November 30, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Happy birthday, Clarice, yes bgates did add a few, but I'm kind of surprised that Yahoo
even came close to the point, that's really
AP, the dispatcher of a thousand slanders against well you know who.
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2009 at 11:03 AM
You can't make this stuff up ...
... and even the Progressives can see the hypocrisy in this from "Mustard Boy" ...Posted by: Neo | November 30, 2009 at 11:08 AM
-he doesn't much like America
...
-no sense of what it means to be an American
I recently read _Without Roots_ (Pope Benedict, and Marcello Pera of the Italian Senate). From Benedict's remarks:
By "West" here, the Pope means primarily "Europe." In his responding remarks, Pena adds something about the U.S.:
Unfortunately, what we have now in the U.S. is a president who entirely exemplifies the attitude described by Benedict, and has none of the self-love described by Pena. He is locked into the attitude described by Pena as that of European intellectuals. Obama cannot bring himself to be a cheerleader for the very country that he represents.
Contrast Obama's attitude with what I was reading last night in Thomas Paine:
Certainly a refreshing change from the "we suck" oratory coming from the current occupant of the White House.
Posted by: PD | November 30, 2009 at 11:12 AM
This is scary--
11 months in, and the record is as follows:
"economic stimulus" failure as far as jobs is concerned and caused a debt explosion, although it let a lot of profligate states (NY, Cal. Mass. Ill. etc) keep UNION State workers on the payroll for an extra year, so I guess that worked for Barry O:
Middle class tax Cut-- yeah, NEXT!!!
Win in Afghanistan, the real central front: maybe, maybe not, and it is certainly worse than one year ago, while Iraq continues to stabilize as a real society (what happened to Saddam and the Baath thugs, can't remember)
Financial Crisis: the Paulson/Bernanke/Bush TARP was a necessary evil and it worked as far as the banks are concerned, course Emanauel and Barry O turned it into a UAW money pit to takeover GM and screw bondholders instead of letting a normal banruptcy happen;
Energy: weak dollar and no new US petroleum exploration has skyrocketed gas prices, a major tax on middle class workers; no initiatives to encourage natural gas and nuke expansion;
Foreign Relations: kiss up to enemies of freedom (especially the thieves on the East River, the UN) back of the hand to democracies like Israel and Honduras-- Mullahs will fire off a nuke in short order: EPIC FAIL.
Health care: federal takeover and rationing forever are in reach, God help us.
All this just after 11 months. Think the unthinkable because it will happen: US Debt Default, Hyper-Inflation in debtor nations (UK, USA, even Japan) the Mullahs nuke Tel Aviv, Venezuela invades-- somebody, Russia annexes Georgia, and the Ukraine Black Sea ports.
Cheers
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2009 at 11:22 AM
They finally pinned Sarah Palin with the gaffe of all gaffes ...
I wonder which John Wooden complained ?
Posted by: Neo | November 30, 2009 at 11:25 AM
Neo, that does it, I'm throwing out my copy of Sarah's book.
Posted by: PD | November 30, 2009 at 11:39 AM
Clarice, if you are no good at math (bearing the double burden of being both female and a lawyer) --- Go ahead and thwack, I'm standing back ---, then I suggest you not engage Chaco on the subject of ice on Greenland...
Seriously, JOMers, I trust everyone had a nice Thanksgiving, normal family stuff notwithstanding? I promise that our dinners on the island will all be perfect!
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 30, 2009 at 11:42 AM
bgates:
"-he treats war criminals like common thieves"
and our warriors like war criminals
Posted by: Kevin B | November 30, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Rosenberg: This Isn't A Recession, It's A Depression
Here are the final three paragraphs, after the intro and pictures:
Not sayin' this is correct, but I am saying that it's worrisome enough that Congress needs to get serious about it--since Obama appears to have ceded much of his governing responsibility to the Legislative Branch.
Posted by: anduril | November 30, 2009 at 12:27 PM
The goal of health care "reform" is to destroy the ability of insurance companies to control health care costs. That's why Obama got the AMA on board. Of course once the government has the ability to control prices and there are no private actors, the AMA is in for a pretty rude awakening...
Posted by: cathyf | November 30, 2009 at 12:35 PM
...as is the management of AARP, Cathy.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 30, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Chelsea Clinton's engagement to some lefty dirtbag was reported months ago. I am always suspicious of everything the Clintons do since they are never on the level. Why is this (LUN) a story that is running today?
Posted by: peter | November 30, 2009 at 12:43 PM
I found this part of the story quite informative peter:
One of my niece's close friends was on a ski vacation in college at a place where Chelsea was also on a ski vacation while in college. The report was that unless it was all about Chelsea, Chelsea threw a fit.
It should be an interesting marriage.
Posted by: Jane | November 30, 2009 at 01:09 PM
If ZeroCare is defeated, it will be in part thanks to this woman:
Posted by: Fresh Air | November 30, 2009 at 01:16 PM
Note the words on the Blackberry: "DEATH PANEL."
Posted by: Fresh Air | November 30, 2009 at 01:22 PM
Copenhagen looks to be exciting ...
Posted by: Neo | November 30, 2009 at 01:23 PM
Bgates, note that the article you linked, from John Harris of POLITICO, is all about perception, and how these perceptions might cause trouble for The Once. Harris is the perfect reporter for The Once: who cares about results, just so long as the rubes continue to swallow the bunk you dump over their heads? Ask Harris about the Fort Hood massacre, and he'd tell you all about the reaction in the polls, and what it might mean in the Texas congressional races next year. Security implications? The effect on the families? "I don't know, and I don't care and why should I care?"
However harsh this article may seem to The Once, it is actually a sort of "Dutch uncle," advising him to get his spin straight, or he'll only get four years of GQ cover articles instead of eight.
Harris is a perfect example of all that's wrong with the press today.
Posted by: Gregory Koster | November 30, 2009 at 01:24 PM
FA, where did you find that picture
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2009 at 01:38 PM
That's a great pic, FA.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 30, 2009 at 01:40 PM
Not sayin' this is correct, but I am saying that it's worrisome enough that Congress needs to get serious about it
Unfortunately, Congress getting serious these days means "making it worse." A lot worse. And spending lots of money to do so.
Posted by: PD | November 30, 2009 at 01:52 PM
or he'll only get four years of GQ cover articles instead of eight.......
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
thump
Laughing my head off.
Posted by: peter | November 30, 2009 at 01:53 PM
OT via Powerline:
During the last presidential primary season, we wrote extensively about Mike Huckabee's excessive use of his power, as governor of Arkansas, to issue pardons and commutations, and his role in influencing the parole process. In one particularly egregious instance, Huckabee worked behind the scenes in favor of releasing on parole a convicted rapist who, once free, raped and murdered a woman in Missouri.
Now we learn that Maurice Clemmons, accused of the execution-style murder of four police officers in Washington state, had a lengthy jail term commuted by Huckabee in 2000. Clemons had served only 11 years of a 95-year prison sentence.
The Huckabee camp is trying to pass this off as failure of "the system" in both Arkansas and Washington. But my friend Bill Otis, a former prosecutor, observes that the "system" had Clemmons behind bars for the duration until Huckabee let him out.
Posted by: anduril | November 30, 2009 at 01:57 PM
What do her buttons say? That's a great picture, FA.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 30, 2009 at 01:58 PM
Re Chelsea's intended:
Mezvinsky was also involved in a series of business transactions that ultimately became his downfall. Prosecutors later would call him a one-man crime wave.[1] In 2000, after examining his business deals since 1980, prosecutors said that they uncovered elements of fraud in nearly every one.[1]
Maybe she inherited her dad's preference for living dangerously. Or was that her mother?
Posted by: anduril | November 30, 2009 at 01:59 PM
Narciso--
Conservatives4Palin had it on one of their threads.
Posted by: Fresh Air | November 30, 2009 at 01:59 PM
Great picture, FA!!!
Eh, Chelsea - who cares?
Posted by: centralcal | November 30, 2009 at 02:10 PM
Any one how to get rid of Alpha Antivirus, other than a sledge hammer, they keep blocking my way, and I've had to resort ot blackberry and laptop
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2009 at 02:12 PM
Per yahoo site, this suggestion, narciso:
Best Answer - Chosen by Voters
This free removal tool for Alpha Antivirus removes this fake Antivirus automatically from your system, it removes too all other files, dll files and registry keys created by the virus.
It's effective and easy to use.
http://www.net-studio.org/eng/patch/patc…
Download
Unpack
Run
Click on the delete button
When that's done restart your computer.
4 weeks ago
Posted by: clarice | November 30, 2009 at 02:25 PM
Narciso...google it and you find about twenty sets of how-to instructions for that one. Sounds like you are not alone.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 30, 2009 at 02:25 PM
If you Save As... you can see she's holding the snakes head in her other hand. Buttons are hard to read when zoomed. I think the middle one says LIFE on the bottom, the 4th from left might be a Reagan campaign button and the 5th looks like a basketball with #4 and some writing above. Hard to make out the writing.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 30, 2009 at 02:26 PM
That painting is hideous. Not just saying.
Posted by: bunky | November 30, 2009 at 02:27 PM
Not just saying.
What are you doing in addition to saying?
Posted by: bgates | November 30, 2009 at 02:31 PM
Bgates:
I'm saying
Posted by: bunky | November 30, 2009 at 02:32 PM
But I can't log on to my own computer, how do I down load it
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2009 at 02:36 PM
narciso...wait till DrJ comes online!
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 30, 2009 at 02:41 PM
Here! (Hope this is not a duplicate...)
That's a nasty one -- I removed it from my granddaughter's computer. In the end I got most things back to the way they were supposed to be, but rather than mess with the final details, I reformatted and reinstalled. There was nothing of value on the computer.
But that does not help you.
Do you have another computer? You will need to make a CD with certain files on it, and you have to get those files on line. With the virus you cannot do so. It need not be anything fancy, just one with an Internet connection and a CD burner.
I was able to log in, so maybe the virus has changed a bit. Are you able to boot into safe mode?
Posted by: DrJ | November 30, 2009 at 03:12 PM
Up yours bunky.
Posted by: Fresh Air | November 30, 2009 at 03:27 PM
then I suggest you not engage Chaco on the subject of ice on Greenland...
There's no math in that. just a little arithmetic....
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | November 30, 2009 at 03:29 PM
Booting into safe mode is the key.
Posted by: sbw | November 30, 2009 at 03:29 PM
Any one how to get rid of Alpha Antivirus
Buy a Mac.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | November 30, 2009 at 03:31 PM
Narciso, I have often found my internet service provider (they who receive the monthly checks) to be helpful. You might try their website for support phone number and/or online chat that you can access from your laptop or blackberry.
Most have virus removal downloads and will walk you through the process.
After booting into safe mode (on your infected computer) you should be able to run or install a virus remover downloaded onto a CD or flash drive from your laptop.
Safe Mode:
Posted by: boris | November 30, 2009 at 03:39 PM
narciso, hang in there. i'm searching earlier JOM threads, collecting all my linux posts. i'll be pasting them in here shortly.
Posted by: anduril | November 30, 2009 at 03:39 PM
Jed Babbin has an interesting article, Obama at West Point, with some, perhaps, provocative things to say. This article, I should add, is not about Obama's speech per se but about all the reasons (grouped under 3 points) that Obama will "get it wrong." Overall, says Babbin:
Point number one?
I liked Rush's take, via Richard Allen, on Obama choosing to speak at West Point rather than from the venue where all major Presidential statements are made from: the Oval Office. No credibility, has to go for gimmicks.
Posted by: anduril | November 30, 2009 at 03:48 PM
OT, but, but, I thought the world was now in love with us because of Obama?
Change! Somali Terrorists Use Obama Portraits For Target Practice
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 03:57 PM
narciso, I can send you the CD of your choice if you can afford to wait. Let me know which remover you want (or I can pick a few) and send it to you by mail. Contact me at: info at sonatabio dot com .
Posted by: DrJ | November 30, 2009 at 03:59 PM
From Sarah Palin’s Facebook page:
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 04:01 PM
So the president is going to take on the Saudi Wahabbists and Iranian neofascists and do a Cambodia into the tribal areas?
And once again, notice ow "he's" going to finish the job.It is always about Barry.
Posted by: matt | November 30, 2009 at 04:05 PM
From Insty:
UNSURPRISINGLY, SARAH PALIN’S BOOK IS NOW #1 on the New York Times bestseller list.
Oh, it must just frost the left to see this.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 04:06 PM
What the hell is this?
Obama Considers Civil War? Orders 1 Million Troops to Prepare?!
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 04:15 PM
No One Remembers Barack Obama From Columbia
Among other links is one to JOM from 2008.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 04:29 PM
It is really quite simple, Sara P2P, collective amnesia struck the Columbia campus. There are three people, I believe, who claim they have a recollection of Obama at Columbia. One is nut job cartoonist Ted Rall, one of the others is Professor Baron, who is mentioned in your link, but whose wikipedia entry was deleted by Wiki's lefty editorial board. Bill Ayers, I am sure, knows about Obama's activities at Columbia, and if he is provoked, may actually reveal something.
Posted by: peter | November 30, 2009 at 04:40 PM
from Wikipedia: Obama as a college student (LUN)
Posted by: peter | November 30, 2009 at 04:49 PM
Quite a notion propounded by Palin. In war, victory is the goal. I'll bet whatever courses Obama was taking at Columbia, he was never exposed to that concept.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | November 30, 2009 at 04:49 PM
What the hell is this?
Completely nuts. Where would Obama get a million troops?
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | November 30, 2009 at 04:52 PM
Where would Obama get a million troops? see LUN
Posted by: peter | November 30, 2009 at 05:02 PM
Charlie: That was my reaction too. Although Peter's link to Americorps gave me pause for about 1/4 of a second, I then thought, "no way Obama could convince a million people to follow him as a leader into battle." In fact, the more I thought about it the more ludicrous it seems. Our side has the guns, doncha know. :)
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 05:13 PM
There are some things I won't waste my time on. Obama fomenting Civil War is one of them. False, it's a waste of time. True, it would be a speculation whose time has not come.
It's the sort of rumor Snopes snuffs and the rabid left would dine on in their paranoia.
Posted by: sbw | November 30, 2009 at 05:16 PM
Since when did the CBO become a political arm of the White House?
It's CBO's response to Senator Bayh's request for health insurance premiums info.
Posted by: glasater | November 30, 2009 at 05:20 PM
Tonight, he speaks to the Long Gray Line about his Afghanistan strategy. He is going to go Hamlet on us, I just know it.
But you know what is so damning about what he is about to do? His heart isn't in it. This is all political and some 19 year old kid with acne and a love of adventure, country and army is going to do his mission without his CINC's enthusiasm. That is what is deplorable. I would rather he stick to his left wing principle and just leave and give it back to Doc and Binny for some one else to solve.
What a disaster. What a complete waste of human intellect and political theatre. God bless America because for a long time we really need it.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | November 30, 2009 at 05:20 PM
Sara - LUN is the Reihl World View article from around the same time Oct. 2008 wondering about Obama @ Columbia.
We know nothing about the President of the United States. Unbelievable!
Posted by: Janet | November 30, 2009 at 05:25 PM
Wow!! OT but this guy on Beck says that Iran owns thirty per cent of the property in Dubai.....
Posted by: glasater | November 30, 2009 at 05:25 PM
"Since when did the CBO become a political arm of the White House?"
Since the President subcontracted his job out to Pelosi & Reid?
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 30, 2009 at 05:26 PM
at AT: Gingrich statement on Climategate said to be pending
AT has had perhaps the best coverage on this issue anywhere. But what I'm missing re this item is, why should I give a shit?
Posted by: anduril | November 30, 2009 at 05:29 PM
I have a question that has been bugging me for a long time. I wonder if anyone else thinks the reason the democrats keep trying to push the return of the draft is to eliminate all those young ones whose "love of adventure, country and army is going to do his mission without his CINC's enthusiasm." I think the left never ever thought anyone would join the military if it were voluntary. The fact that they did and in huge numbers is a fact they just can't compute. Then to add insult to injury, this all volunteer force turned out to be extraordinarily dedicated and well above the national norms as far as education and IQ. The left thinks the military should be staffed with nothing but the dregs of society, good canon fodder, when instead it is a highly technical and honed fighting force, proud of their service, which bugs the left most of all. The military just doesn't cooperate with the left's view that it is the last resort of the useless, full of druggies and those too dumb to do anything but be a target. Not enough diversity for crack and potheads, drunks and dropouts, I guess. So it is bring back the draft.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 05:36 PM
Happy birthday, clarice.
According to my cheesy birthday book, yours is The Day of the Measured Attack: Those born today are highly intuitive and capable of springing surprises on those who would hinder or obstruct them. Strengths - Thorough, Funny, Dynamic
You share your day with Mark Twain, Jonathan Swift and Winston Churchill.
Posted by: Frau Gratuliere | November 30, 2009 at 06:11 PM
Based on Kerry's and Rangle's comments, the left's position is that the only reason people join the military is because they're too dumb or disadvantaged to do anything else. The draft would therefore be more fair, with the privileged just as likely to be forced into such a menial and lowly profession as anyone else.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 30, 2009 at 06:18 PM
Boy, Anduril. I better not leave the house if the Grinchrinch is about to speak.
My vote for the funniest line on Ace of Spades in the month of October, from a commenter on Newt's own blog about his role in the NY-23 fiasco, directed to Newt:
"I want you to know I like you and I hope one day you find something you are good at."
Posted by: Fresh Air | November 30, 2009 at 06:22 PM
Paging Al Gore....Paging Al Gore.....you're wanted for a statement on Climategate....
Posted by: matt | November 30, 2009 at 06:22 PM
Posted this in the Tiger thread by mistake:
From a Tweet:
BREAKING: The Food channel is creating a new cooking show "How to cook the books on climate with Al Gore"
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 06:30 PM
Yes, why are we waiting for Newt to speak? It is almost as meaningless as hearing about the Clinton child's betrothal.
BTW yesterday was Rahm Emanuel's birthday. It's good to know that clarice was *not* born yesterday.
Posted by: Frau Gratuliere | November 30, 2009 at 06:35 PM
Happy Birthday, Clarice. I will lift a glass of leftover Thanksgiving riesling in your honor when I get home.
Posted by: peter | November 30, 2009 at 06:39 PM
Thnkx, Peter.
Posted by: clarice | November 30, 2009 at 06:42 PM
Thanks, Frau. But my birthday is Dec 2.
Posted by: clarice | November 30, 2009 at 06:43 PM
Prisoner-Abuse Photos: Supremes Reverse Disclosure Order -- By: Andy McCarthy
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 06:59 PM
December 2nd - will try and remember that, Clarice! Number 2 son's is December 7th. Always an easy date to remember. heh.
I guess we are honoring P'UK's establishment of a several day Clarice holiday! (tell your hubby it should be observed like an advent calendar, and he should give you a little somethin-somethin each day!)
Posted by: centralcal | November 30, 2009 at 07:03 PM
A Newt groupie phoned to have me listen to an important message from Newt about saving our country.
Most often with such calls I say 'No, thank you' and hang up.
This time I told the person that I didn't need Newt to tell me that the country needed help, however, Newt was the wrong person for the job anyway.
Posted by: sbw | November 30, 2009 at 07:10 PM
I agree with Rush that there is something fishy with the whole state dinner party crash brouha. What is the email I'm suppose to send fishy going-ons to?
Sorta like the N.Y. flyover...that was fishy too, but never really explained well.
LUN is a WaPo article saying they contacted someone in the Pentagon before going to the party.
Posted by: Janet | November 30, 2009 at 07:13 PM
Wow! Over at CampaignSpot, they've got Survey USA results for Adults, approval-disapproval Obama:
Missouri: 38-58
Virginia: 37-60
Washington: 48-48
Oregon: 47-47
Posted by: PaulL | November 30, 2009 at 07:18 PM
Having gone to the dull and tedious session of the Iraq inquiry today, I was curious how the the ladies and gentlemen of the press would fill their alloted column inches. A quick scan indicates the military planning has taken pride of place.
Posted by: Elliott | November 30, 2009 at 07:21 PM
From the comments at the WaPo story -
The Olympic committee made a fool of Obama.
The Iranians have made a fool of Obama.
The Chinese just made a fool of Obama.
The Israelis just made a fool of Obama.
The Taliban have made a fool of Obama.
Washington socialites have made a fool of Obama.
See a pattern here?
Hahaha
Posted by: Janet | November 30, 2009 at 07:22 PM
I saw in interview this morning with a former rabid Obama supporter who 11 mo. later is saying, "he talks too much and never says anything, I don't listen to him anymore."
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 07:23 PM
Even in Washington and Oregon? Holy carp. I wonder what it is among likely voters. If he can't hold granola/environmental set
All this and instructions from Michael Moore today (LUN) on what to do in Afghanistan so as not to lose his base. My only comment to that advice is pulllleeze take it oh Wizard of Once.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vjnjagvet | November 30, 2009 at 07:32 PM
Climategate Explodes The Myth Of Politically-Neutral Science.
Great picture of Algore here. I think he's explaining how he invented the airplane.
Posted by: anduril | November 30, 2009 at 07:34 PM
Wow, PaulL, and that's adults - not even likely voters.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 30, 2009 at 07:37 PM
From Elliott's link.
Oooh... "[M]ight be some evidence that there was some connection" is sure a devastating indictment, even if he actually did say that, which is doubtful.Britain seems to be suffering from a lack of American leadership.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 30, 2009 at 07:37 PM
When reading that Supreme Court story,
remember that the newest member(Sonia Sotomayor) of the court was involved in the case long before it got to the Supreme Court.
Posted by: pagar | November 30, 2009 at 07:37 PM
So are we, Ext, so are we.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 30, 2009 at 07:58 PM
It is worse than I thought, if that's possible:
The Unmasking of Barack Obama
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 08:19 PM
No doubt. Of course I got the quote wrong in my bolding, but the message is the same. Without an American president explaining the benefits of turning Iraq into a respected member of the world of nations, the high ground is essentially ceded.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 30, 2009 at 08:21 PM
Peter, on the Americorps thing, the total size of Americorps is only 70,000 — there've only been a half million total since the program began. So that leaves 0.93 million....
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | November 30, 2009 at 08:23 PM
Oh, it must just frost the left to see this.
Bitterness is like drinking poison and expecting the other guy to die.
Posted by: PD | November 30, 2009 at 08:31 PM
Narcisco
You need a rescue disk that will allow you to boot from the disk ( CD) instead of booting from your hard drive. There are a number of them online, just do a search in google for "rescue disk" and a number will pop up.
Once you get control of your machine back, I would suggest some freeware known as "malwarebytes". It is very good at finding spyware and trojans etc and getting them gone from your system to keep it clean.
Good luck.
Posted by: Gmax | November 30, 2009 at 08:53 PM
Did someone say fishy?
Gatecrash Update
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | November 30, 2009 at 08:59 PM