Doppelblogger Patrick Appel explains that Andrew Sullivan's unique voice is really a three way party line and puzzles us with this:
So Andrew is a weathervane pointing whichever way the wind is blowing? Well, sure, he supported the war in Iraq when it was cool and opposed it when that was cool, but really - shouldn't he and his minions aspire to pointing boldly towards The Truth, regardless of the prevailing breezes?
The Ace has more. And "Doppelblogger" is all Mickey (Scroll down).
AS IF WE NEEDED FURTHER CONVINCING: In a follow-up Mr. Appel adds this:
I'm not nearly as talented a writer as Andrew is, a fact readers ceaseless remind me of whenever I guest-blog for the Dish.
All your adverbs are belong to me.
Hands up! This is a hijack!
Posted by: anduril | December 17, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Kaus' strategy, of course, is the wonderfully responsible one of: pass a mess now and make it work later. Yeah, right!
Posted by: anduril | December 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Sullivan has been so vicious and
irresponsible, in the last yeat that one can't help that Appel is associated with him, and not in a good way. No, Kaus doesn't make
much more sense either
Posted by: narciso | December 17, 2009 at 11:14 AM
I kinda thought there was too much crazy over there to be the work of just one person.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | December 17, 2009 at 11:19 AM
You mean Sullivan ? Antiwar is rather crazy , too..
Wikipedia (the ron Paulian stream of carp):
Giraldi's claim in the American Conservative magazine
In August 2005, Philip Giraldi claimed that US Vice President Dick Cheney had instructed STRATCOM to prepare
"a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States... [including] a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons... not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States."
The reason cited for the attack to use mini-nukes is that the targets are hardened or are deep underground and would not be destroyed by non-nuclear warheads.[4]
[edit] On forged documents
He has written about forged documents and the Iraq War intelligence twice.
First, he said that the Italian Niger/yellowcake document were forgeries created by former CIA officers and Michael Ledeen. See Niger uranium forgeries.
Second, he said that the Habbush letter was created by the Office of Special Plans on the order of Dick Cheney. See Habbush letter
[edit] 2008 Primaries
During the 2008 presidential primaries, Giraldi served as Ron Paul's foreign policy adviser.
**
Posted by: clarice | December 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM
Since yer 'Mickey' link demurred to the Healthcare debate, it ain't, technically OT.
In order for the Dems to consider the Nuclear Option, it would take balls. Therefore, ambinder is just stoking the furnace to kill any Healthcare Reform, of any variety that doesn't completely satisfy the Healthcare Industry.
Along with that Strawman, I will eat Maguire's Straw Hat, if the Dems actually pursue a simple majority. They , like all politicians, value their jobs more than the Public Trust they pretend to defend.
Posted by: Willie Wonka | December 17, 2009 at 11:36 AM
Yes, he's either certifiable or mendacious, He was a Turkey and/Italy expert, yet he claims expertise that is far a field
Posted by: narciso | December 17, 2009 at 11:37 AM
2 strikes against you, clarice:
1. you're trying to hijack this thread from its topic, and
2. you're peeking at my posts again.
Posted by: anduril | December 17, 2009 at 11:54 AM
Any partner of Cannistraro is certifiable or corrupt.
As for Sullivan why did he allow Appel to reveal this now? Is he leaving and wants to turn this over? It is not just serendipity.
Posted by: clarice | December 17, 2009 at 11:54 AM
Excuse me, but what the hell does Andrew Sullivan do all day? He needs help to produce that pitiful little blog at the Atlantic? Geez, the only thing it publishes are 1000 versions of how much thinking people should hate Sarah Palin--you need help to do that?
Posted by: verner | December 17, 2009 at 12:03 PM
They do strike me, like the Tommy Lee Jones character in "Under Siege", or the Timothy
Oliphant villain in the latest "Die hard." If only they had listened to me, Saddamm would still be in power, and everything would be hunky dory
Posted by: narciso | December 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM
Excuse me, but what the hell does Andrew Sullivan do all day?
Pot?
Posted by: Rob Crawford | December 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM
excuse me, but what the hell does Andrew Sullivan do all day?
eeewwww, don't want to go there
Posted by: peter | December 17, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Well there is adoration of the Obami, that takes work in all it's manifestation. Greeley
is doing somersaults, at what his Atlantic has become.
Posted by: narciso | December 17, 2009 at 12:12 PM
Exactly--Preposterous that he can't turn this out on his own.
Posted by: clarice | December 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Right Clarice, and one can only imagine how much they are paying him for it.
Another example of a rich person (David Bradley) using his money foolishly to gain access to the Kewl kids...
With Andrew, he had a writer who would reliably give Obama and his crew journalistic BJ's in a taylorized fashion. Thus the big paycheck for the trademark "conservative" (cough cough) gay guy and his ghostwriters. The cute beagles--lagniappe.
Posted by: verner | December 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM
With Andrew, he had a writer who would reliably give Obama and his crew journalistic BJ's in a taylorized fashion.
I think you wrote "journalistic" when you meant to write " ".
Posted by: bgates | December 17, 2009 at 04:06 PM
bgates--well, that too--you bad thing. I've always felt that Andrew's main attraction to Obama is just the plain old garden variety sexual type...
Posted by: verner | December 17, 2009 at 06:08 PM
I'm surprised our in house NYT reader didn't find something to say about this: Ross Douthat: Here's How To Understand Obama's Hand In Glove Relationship With Big Business.
Posted by: anduril | December 17, 2009 at 07:04 PM
Here's an amusing, but sad, report from The Corner:
Posted by: anduril | December 17, 2009 at 07:36 PM
I think we're talking unitary executive, not Doppelblogger, but this was still pretty lame:
Bylines would fracture the solitary voice of the blog.
Sullivan's aversion to giving other people credit where credit is due goes back to his earliest days on the net, where he was padding his blog with anonymous reader emails from day one. He originally couched his refusal to acknowledge their authors as a "policy" designed to promote ideas based debate over personality driven argument. We've got yr irony right here.
I wouldn't be surprised if the mud slinger in chief were expecting to be outed for this little fraud. Hotfooting it out of town, and letting a minion take the heat, seems par for the Sullivan course.
Posted by: JM Hanes | December 17, 2009 at 08:04 PM
"But the presiding officer, one Sen. Al Franken"
Al Franken presiding over a PTA meeting would be scary. Al Franken presiding over the US Senate shows just how far this once great country has fallen.
Posted by: pagar | December 17, 2009 at 08:45 PM
Patrick Appel writes in the linked story:
"I've marinated in Sullivan's cerebral juices for a few years now..."
Maybe its just me, but for some reason that phrase strikes me as almost vomit inducing.
Posted by: daddy | December 17, 2009 at 08:50 PM
It's most definitely not just you daddy.
Posted by: Ignatz | December 17, 2009 at 08:59 PM
It is peculiar that Apel would suddenly and proudly announce that Sully's even a bigger fraud than we imagined.Maybe Sully's been reading all those articles in the MSM about how much fun it is to be unemployed (now that there's a Dem president).
Posted by: clarice | December 17, 2009 at 09:08 PM
I'm not a big fan of Rod Dreher, but...he seems to have the same take as Rick Moran. Come to think of it, I'm not much of a fan of Moran, either. Still:
I'm reading Sarah Palin's "Going Rogue":
So he does update it, and that's why I provided the link above! Everybody happy about that? Well, just in case you're too lazy to click the link, here's Dreher's absolute bottom line:
Posted by: anduril | December 17, 2009 at 09:39 PM
There is nothing about effective stewardship, or budgeting or fighting corruption in Dreher's account. Daddy explained to me the unique nature of the oligarchy that reigns in the state, United Fruit with Polar Bears. Dreher really hates capitalism intrinsically, she has problems with some company's management of the lands. THat's why she opposed the corrupt bargain with Exxon Mobil,
why she pushed for an open bidding process.
Posted by: narciso | December 17, 2009 at 09:53 PM
It must be nice to be a CNN International Reporter. You wake up and know that the Science is settled, that no one in Copenhagen has any motive whatever beyond altruisim and a sincere love of GAIA and their fellow man, and that whatever agreement gets churned out in this transcendent moment of human nobility will prove compassionate, visionary, and beneficial.
Just watched one pop up and say matter of factly that Global Warming will cause wars, because some nations will no longer be able to produce crops, while other countries will be enabled to start producing crops, thus wars will start. And here to comment on AGW starting wars is my guest from the UN Mister blah, blah, blah...
I feel sad for you JOMer's back stateside not being able to share the karmic wonderfulness of the moment with me and CNN International. Bummer.
Posted by: daddy | December 17, 2009 at 09:59 PM
Don't cry for us, daddy. Rest assured the stateside press shares in the bliss, and continues to spread the gospel. I know, we don't get to see Al in the flesh, but they are working hard to convey to us just how truly special it all is.
Posted by: Boatbuilder | December 17, 2009 at 10:14 PM
Speaking of Andrew's DoppelBloggers, how about Android Andrew ">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1235994/I-Robot-Buy-android-double-Christmas.html"> Doppelganger-Bot Bloggers?
Simply stew in Sully's cerebral juices for a few years, set in front of a keyboard, and voila', your Daily Dis.
Posted by: daddy | December 17, 2009 at 10:31 PM
Found a great letter to the eds for y'all to read.
LUN
Posted by: Stephanie | December 17, 2009 at 10:40 PM
More ">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1236651/Is-lost-city-Atlantis-Grainy-images-released-showing-city-like-structures-beneath-Caribbean-Sea.html"> "The Science is settled"
Now if we could just tie in Nessie, Bigfoot, Crop Circles, AGW, and the Face on Mar's, we'd be getting somewhere!
Posted by: daddy | December 17, 2009 at 10:41 PM
Great letter Stephanie,
Very funny but true. Thanks for posting it.
Posted by: daddy | December 17, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Thanks, Stephanie, that was a refreshing link.
Keep an eye out for the burning bag I left on the doorstep of the other thread...
G'night all.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | December 17, 2009 at 11:03 PM
Even More settled Science!
Wherein I prove that ">http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap091214.html"> Saturn's Hexagon is actually ">http://www.its.caltech.edu/~atomic/snowcrystals/class/w031223d079.jpg"> a Snowflake!
Posted by: daddy | December 17, 2009 at 11:07 PM
Alright, I'll quit.
But as if there wasn't already enough encroachment on the territory of endangered Polar Bear's:
">http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/1060566.html"> Beware of frog 'hitchhikers' on Christmas trees.
Posted by: daddy | December 17, 2009 at 11:27 PM
Wife is watching Joy Behag and the pressing news topic of the day is Sarah Palin's hat.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | December 18, 2009 at 12:27 AM
They say it will only cost the US about $100 billion …
Posted by: Neo | December 18, 2009 at 01:32 AM
I can't believe The Atlantic is paying ghostbloggers for Andrew!!! The Atlantic???
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | December 18, 2009 at 02:19 AM
“I think Palin is probably a likable person…But she is so far from being capable of being president of the United States…”
Wrong. She is the only politician who proved to be different from current breed of illiterate, soft-fingered, and egomaniac layers you vote to rule the country.
You can call it “hope and change”. The real one.
Posted by: AL | December 18, 2009 at 05:18 AM
This year, the presidential capability bar has been permanently lowered. It is reasonable to argue that we now have the worst president in American history, and that virtually any randomly-chosen adult would be better. Therefore, references to how far from "capable" Palin or anyone else is simply reveal Dreher as either a fool or a liberal suck-up. (Oh, and he's on NPR is he? Didn't realize they had many "conservatives" there.)
Posted by: Extraneus | December 18, 2009 at 06:46 AM
Chaco is top story at Powerline.
We are surrounded by rockstars!
Posted by: Old Lurker | December 18, 2009 at 07:09 AM
simply reveal Dreher as either a fool or a liberal suck-up.
They aren't mutually exclusive. Ok, it's no surprise that the douchetools at Pravda West wouldn't like teh Sarah's book. The question is: Have they turned their critical eyes to the subliterate doggerel that ManBearPig penned in his latest propaganda scam text? That "poem" is so godawful (as somebody at AoS wrote: It's like calling a bunch of bullet points in a presentation poetry) that I'd rather endure Dhimmi Carter's senile ramblings than subject myself to that sub-tripe.
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 18, 2009 at 07:51 AM
Extraneus-
It is reasonable to argue that we now have the worst president in American history, and that virtually any randomly-chosen adult would be better.
Obama has a ways to go before he reaches Fillmore or Wilson status.
Posted by: RichatUF | December 18, 2009 at 08:03 AM
Its hot
and getting hotter.
earthheat
one million degrees and lockboxes
for Mother Gaia
one million dollars and fixers
for Father Earth
my blubber layers
are earthheat endothermic
and winter storms are named after me.
Posted by: Poet Laureate Al Gore | December 18, 2009 at 08:09 AM
He'll make it, Rich.
Posted by: Extraneus | December 18, 2009 at 08:26 AM
I think this is pretty funny:
2010 Campaign Preview: Democrats To Say GOP Still Party Of Bush
Posted by: Jane | December 18, 2009 at 08:29 AM
Through years of therapy
and awkwardness within my skin
I've finally found my voice
When earth has a fever
I'm the doctor
in the ER
Though my teachers at St Albans
may not have recognized my genius
I have the last laugh
And for the apostates
in Divinity school
I've found a more convenient deity
In the Buddhist temples
brimming with cash
I detected serenity
who cares if the Arctic isn't a continent
Posted by: ManBearPig | December 18, 2009 at 08:29 AM
Little does A know he's become stuck in our sticky web
so he can't disrupt the thousand Climategate parties elsewhere :) Good work, gang! Keep it up, ignore but engage just enough to keep him here.
Posted by: BlackWidow | December 18, 2009 at 08:31 AM
It would kick off with $US10 billion ($A11.28 billion) a year from 2010 to 2012, climbing to $US50 billion ($A56.39 billion) annually by 2015 and $US100 billion ($A112.78 billion) by 2020
I guess it's pure chance that the costs don't explode until the 2012 election is over.
Posted by: DebinNC | December 18, 2009 at 08:33 AM
"Obama has a ways to go before he reaches Fillmore or Wilson status. "
My first thought was up or down. I'd be interested to hear more thoughts on this.
Posted by: pagar | December 18, 2009 at 08:38 AM
“I don't know what's happening here in this body,” McCain said, “but I think it is wrong.”
Does it really take Mr. Obvious to point out what's happening?
Posted by: Pofarmer | December 18, 2009 at 08:54 AM
Pagar,
My first thought was to channel my son: "Are we there yet?"
It was 80 and raining when I left Orlando yesterday. Now in Southampton and it is a bright and sunny 34F with snow on the horizon for tomorrow. Not just snow but a blizzard. Too much CO2 I guess.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | December 18, 2009 at 09:17 AM
Jane, um....should we send the Dems the memo that a significant percentage of the electorate is now nostalgic for Bush after 11 months of Obamasocialism?
History will be kind to GWB.
Posted by: verner | December 18, 2009 at 09:22 AM
Who exactly are McCain and McConnell (when Sanders amendment was withdrawn) pleading with? They look out and complain that the Dems. are cheating!...it's not fair!
Well wake up! The Dems. will cheat, lie, and rob for there ideology. This is nothing new. Are they just now seeing it? The Repubs. are so naive. We need some "tough as nails" leaders or there is no hope in stopping ALL the nonsense that is coming our way.
Posted by: Janet | December 18, 2009 at 09:24 AM
I want Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Ace of Spades, or Bill Whittle to represent me. I want them to say, "You are a moron Al Franken". I want the Dems. to be outraged at the uncouth TRUTH.
Posted by: Janet | December 18, 2009 at 09:34 AM
I'm with you Janet. I want to see some anger.
Posted by: Jane | December 18, 2009 at 09:37 AM
Oh Oh, The Telegraphs Dellingpole says we won the Climategate battle but lost the war:
"Richard North has spotted this, even if virtually nobody else has. The key point, he notes, is the Copenhagen negotiators’ little-publicised decision to save the Kyoto Protocol. This matters because it was at Kyoto that the mechanisms for establishing a global carbon market were established. Carbon trading could not possibly exist without some form of agreement between all the world’s governments on emissions: the market would simply collapse. By keeping Kyoto alive, the sinister troughers of global corporatism have also kept their cash cow alive.
As North says:
This is nothing to do with the headline billions and all the rest. Nope, the deal is that the Kyoto Protocol is saved – which is what all the fuss was really about. That safeguards the carbon market and opens the way for it to expand to the $2-trillion level by the year 2020. Against that, even €100 billion is chump-change – you can buy countries with that sort of money. "
< href=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100020288/climategate-we-won-the-battle-but-at-copenhagen-we-just-lost-the-war/>troughers win?
Posted by: clarice | December 18, 2009 at 09:41 AM
LUN
Posted by: clarice | December 18, 2009 at 09:42 AM
Posted by: Neo | December 18, 2009 at 09:44 AM
I think the phrase we are looking for is "boom, taste my night stick" that's certainly
what they deserve. We have Noah level conditions down here, as bad as the no name storm of 2000
Posted by: narciso | December 18, 2009 at 09:47 AM
Who is enforcing ANY rules or laws anymore? Our side appeals to the rules and law, but it is already gone. The Dems. don't obey any rules....so what? What are we gonna do about it? The Dems. are a law unto themselves. The refs in the game - the media - will let them do anything. There is absolutely no accountability. We must play by "the rules", and they do not. I don't see how we win this game.
Posted by: Janet | December 18, 2009 at 09:56 AM
Wife is watching Joy Behag and the pressing news topic of the day is Sarah Palin's hat.
And so you came here to find out what Michelle wore yesterday? Hey, did you hear she wore black to light the Christmas tree? What was that about?
Here are a couple interesting stories:
Blindfolded on a cliff edge:
"MONTREAL - If the Chinese stock market is still an indicator of global investor appetite for risk, as analysts viewed it a few months ago, then that appetite has lately diminished. Perhaps they are finally absorbing some of the revelations about statistical manipulations."
This one was on the front page of the WSJ yesterday and is a pretty big story:
Not Just Drones: Militants Can Snoop on Most U.S. Warplanes (Updated)
Lots more...well, OK:
Posted by: anduril | December 18, 2009 at 09:57 AM
This link is not intended as an endorsement of DiFazio, but it's worth a read: Pelosi, Rahm do not scare Rep. DeFazio.
I like this quote:
Posted by: anduril | December 18, 2009 at 10:06 AM
Clarice,
I believe that Dellingpole may be a tad too pessimistic. The US is not signatory to Kyoto (BJ Bubba's signature aside) and the Democrat Economy Killers will have to pass Crap on Trade legislation in order for the carbon credit fraud to truly flourish.
I don't see a particularly bright future for Air Taxes.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | December 18, 2009 at 10:08 AM
...like the LUN from Clarice on Kyoto. What are we gonna do about it? How do you stop this madness? H. Clinton is pledging my families money to this fraud...we all know it's a fraud, but we can't stop it.
When I give my money to whatever cause I believe in...and I find out it is a hoax or corrupt, I can stop giving. But when the government takes my money and gives it to different causes...the money never ends, even if the cause is a complete hoax.
I don't see how we stop this madness. I need to go do something positive...I'm rambling and disheartened.
Posted by: Janet | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 AM
Who does this guy think he is?
This rhetoric is just so typically Marxist, so typical of European philosophy from Hegel on. But beyond that--does anyone think that the Chinese or other world leaders take kindly to this bullying style? They may have objected to Bush's "unilateralism," but they can't prefer this hectoring, nanny-style in which Obama addresses them as a god from on high.
Posted by: anduril | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 AM
Rick--Dellingpole's audience is largely British and yes, he was writing that for them. I don't think Cap & Trade will pass here..Americans are less bound to state media and climategate seems to be getting aroung. The WaPo has an interesting poll today, though--despite the public's scepticism about climate change and the pols and scientists who promote it, they want the govt to controlk "greenhouse emissions". Of course it's a WaPo poll so I'd not bet on it being more than a hamburger helper poll, but we cannot let up/
Posted by: clarice | December 18, 2009 at 10:14 AM
Guardian reprint speech (url embedded in article LUN) and is disappointed in the empty blather.
Posted by: clarice | December 18, 2009 at 10:20 AM
Also worth a read--a polarized nation (pun semi-intended): The Battleground Poll and the Battle for America.
Just two snippets:
Posted by: anduril | December 18, 2009 at 10:25 AM
heh, really weird, the way "respondent" starts four consecutive lines.
Posted by: anduril | December 18, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Gerald Warner - "What a bunch of baffoons"
LUN...same link as Neo.
I'd vote for him to represent me.
Posted by: Janet | December 18, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Really fascinating: India is 'thailand' to Asia, say scientists:
Posted by: anduril | December 18, 2009 at 10:35 AM
"So Andrew is a weathervane pointing whichever way the wind is blowing?"
Please don't mention Andrew, pointing, and blowing in the same sentence.
Posted by: willis | December 18, 2009 at 11:56 AM
"Weathervane" is a joke; Sully's fevered obsession with the Trig pregnancy borders on the pornographic.
His ghostwriters probably all take a half-step back and look at each other nervously when Sully goes on one of his Trig rants. Once he calms down they block out the painful memories and pretend nothing happened.
It's how kids react when their parents launch into a screaming match at the dinner table on Thanksgiving, one of those real freak shows where the big guns of TMI crash and explode somewhere over the Plymouth Rock diorama: money problems, sexual inadequacies, weight gain, and the relative happiness of other couples' marriages.
In the ensuing silence one of the kids pipes up, in a voice struggling to be normal but coming out like Oliver Twist, "Pass the turkey, please?"
That child grew up and went on to work for the inhuman intellect of the brilliant Andrew Sullivan. Same scene, new adjectives. "Weathervane" indeed.
Posted by: Trigonometry | December 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM
I always wondered what those two beagels at Sully's feet represented...which one is Patrick?
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth | December 18, 2009 at 01:09 PM
Be careful using the words "Andrew Sullivan" and "blowing" in the same sentence, ok? I just ate lunch.
Posted by: Bob C | December 18, 2009 at 01:24 PM
BTW, the Atlantic pays Sullivan because he is by far the biggest traffic generator to their website. I'd say that scares me, but if you think of him as a troll embedded in the larger blogosphere it sort of makes sense.
Posted by: srp | December 18, 2009 at 10:04 PM