The Cornhusker Kickback that bought Senator Ben Nelson's 60th vote on health care is in the news and causing confusion. From Politico:
...
“Senator Nelson insisted that he had not asked for the Cornhusker Kickback to be placed in the U.S. Senate version of the health care bill to secure his vote. Senator Nelson told the attorney general that it was simply a ‘marker’ placed in the U.S. Senate version of the bill and assured the attorney general that it would be ‘fixed,’ says the memo.
The document goes on to say: “Senator Nelson said it would be ‘fixed’ by extending the Cornhusker Kickback (100% federal payment) on Medicaid to every state.”
That seems to be consistent with what Nelson said on the Senate floor and in a chat with Michael Gerson of the WaPo. However, as noted by Scott Johnson of Powerine, if the real intention is that every state can opt out of the Medicaid mandate, then the CBO score for the bill is even more wildly optimistic than we imagined.
As an alternative reality check, here is the Times description of the Cornhusker Kickback from Dec 22:
The health care bill greatly expands Medicaid, and states would have to pick up some of the cost starting in 2017.
However, under a late change, Nebraska would be exempted, and the federal government would pick up the entire cost for certain people who become eligible for Medicaid there.
Republicans have criticized the Nebraska provision as the “Cornhusker kickback,” but Mr. Nelson pushed back.
“It’s not a special deal,” Mr. Nelson said. “It’s a fair deal. Some people said I was getting money for Nebraska. That’s wrong. I was just getting rid of an underfunded federal mandate. There’s nothing sleazy about it. I cracked the door open for other states.”
"Cracked the door open"? Either other states are exempted in the bill or they are not. Here is the Times from Dec 20:
Nebraska, with help from Mr. Nelson, won a particularly generous arrangement under which the federal government would indefinitely pay the full cost of covering certain low-income people added to the Medicaid rolls under the bill.
Republicans derided this provision as the “Cornhusker kickback.” And they said it was typical of the favors Democrats had given to Mr. Nelson and a handful of other senators.
“You’ve got to compliment Ben Nelson for playing ‘The Price is Right,’ ” said Senator Richard M. Burr, Republican of North Carolina. “He negotiated a Medicaid agreement for Nebraska that puts the federal government on the hook forever. Not for six years, not for 10 years. This isn’t the Louisiana Purchase; this is the Nebraska windfall.”
What, other Senators don't understand the bill either, and have failed to realize this is a windfall for all? Please. Either the CBO score is awry and this bill will blow up the deficit or Nelson is offering Reid a refund. Either way I bet the voters of Nebraska won't be happy.
Are those corndogs made with cornfed pork and chicken?
Posted by: Semanticleo | January 02, 2010 at 11:37 AM
I suspect that when Sen. Nelson becomes "former Senator Nelson" he won't be too pleased with this either...
Posted by: LTC John | January 02, 2010 at 11:41 AM
The all for one argument grows louder as 13 States attorneys threaten suit, doesn't it?
Nelson blew it and I don't see there's any politically viable exit for him .
Posted by: Clarice | January 02, 2010 at 11:55 AM
Bullshit.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | January 02, 2010 at 12:17 PM
He's also 71 I think, or will be when he comes up for office.
Let's put him in the clink.
Posted by: Jane | January 02, 2010 at 12:17 PM
Comes up for REELECTION that should have said.
Posted by: Jane | January 02, 2010 at 12:17 PM
Somebody please evaluate Nelson's vote for cloture now. Was he bribed with a poison pill? Was he aware? His vote must still be legit but stinky, stinky. Will he turncoat the dems? He should be recalled by the Nebraska state legislature now for this miscreant behavior.
Posted by: Mike Mahoney | January 02, 2010 at 12:20 PM
He took the blue pill I think, and ended up with the Cloud City bargain, praying they don't change the terms of the agreement
Posted by: narciso | January 02, 2010 at 12:26 PM
This would explain Schumer's position that every state got something in this bill.
Perhaps there is some implicit agreement that the Dems have running under the radar.
Posted by: tollhouse | January 02, 2010 at 12:39 PM
Jane, have you seen any local polling on the Mass. Senate election?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | January 02, 2010 at 12:41 PM
I thought Aristotle determined that politics correctly practiced was a process that led to clarity, understanding, and sound governance.
Posted by: sbw | January 02, 2010 at 12:44 PM
Local polling in Mass. is likely inaccurate. turnout is key and we do not want Ds motivated anyway. Obamacare is bad for them.
Posted by: PaulV | January 02, 2010 at 12:47 PM
Jane, have you seen any local polling on the Mass. Senate election?
I don't think we have such a thing.
But I'm telling you, I was shocked by all the Brown signs I saw this weekend. Absolutely shocked. I have yet to see a sign for Martha Coakley.
Coakley will take Boston, so Brown has to take the rest of the state. If the current momentum continues I think he has a shot.
Posted by: Jane | January 02, 2010 at 01:11 PM
Posted by: Neo | January 02, 2010 at 01:17 PM
Proud to say Virginia's new AG is one of the 13.
political signs - This last election was very telling with the political signs. There were a lot of signs for the Rep., and they were in people's yards. There were also a lot of signs for the Dem., but they were all in the road medians.
Posted by: Janet | January 02, 2010 at 01:27 PM
Jane, there have been several news reports that he's been getting a great deal more money and support all of a sudden.
Turn out will mean a lot and he should emphasis the health care bill because you apparently are not the only Mass resident who hates your state's program and see where the federal one will head.
Also that magazine spread--(*bad,bad,bad*)
Posted by: Clarice | January 02, 2010 at 01:33 PM
*emphasIZE**
Posted by: Clarice | January 02, 2010 at 01:33 PM
LUN ""Youths" Torch 1137 cars in France..."
I'm reminded of a great line from a Freeper calling the Dennis Miller show..."You are brighter than 300 burning Renaults on a cool Paris night."
Posted by: Janet | January 02, 2010 at 01:36 PM
Jane: Gerraghty has a piece up about Brown.
LUN
Posted by: centralcal | January 02, 2010 at 01:47 PM
Try to imagine Brown winning, and Obamacare going down 59-41 on a cloture vote. I simply can't allow myself to dream about it.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | January 02, 2010 at 02:02 PM
Completely unrelated to anything being discussed today:
Posted by: centralcal | January 02, 2010 at 02:08 PM
Oh, now that's really a shame. Deborah and I had several actually polite conversations and she even quoted me once.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | January 02, 2010 at 02:17 PM
Amazing, we can find how many cars were burnt in France on New Years, and yet we have no clue how many people died in auto accidents in the US in the same period. No clue how many died in auto accidents over the Christmas holidays. No clue that I can find how many died in Auto accidents in the US in 2009. WHY?
How long does it take to consolidate the highway Patrol reports for a state, turn them into a consolidated national report? The figures for each day ought to be available to every one early the next day.
Posted by: pagar | January 02, 2010 at 02:17 PM
centralcal, I found that very sad. I think she had some light bulb moments about bias when she became ombudsman.
Posted by: Janet | January 02, 2010 at 02:19 PM
Deborah Howell was killed after being struck by a car in New Zealand
Do people drive on the left in NZ?
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 02, 2010 at 02:30 PM
Here's the most sensible article I've seen in a long time re The War We're In: "Losing" Our Way to Victory. The author, refreshingly, not only properly identifies The War We're In but also offers recommendations geared specifically toward winning that war--not some other WAS (Wild Ass Scheme) dreamed up by the usual Washington "thinkers".
Note the sentence that I DIDN'T bold:
If the author were right, I'd have no problem at all with the idea. However, whatever else Iran may be, it's not a "jihadist nation," as our "ally" Pakistan very arguably is. IMO, Iran will probably never be able to be an "ally," but in the not too distant future could prove to be a valuable asset in our war against the spread of Islam--if we have eyes to see.
Posted by: anduril | January 02, 2010 at 02:31 PM
There are reports that the absentee voting in Mass are up in an unprecedented way.
handful of residents signed up to vote in towns across Cape Cod this week, as the registration deadline passed to be eligible to vote in this month's U.S. Senate election.
From Barnstable to Chatham to Falmouth, most towns across the Cape saw fewer than 10 voters register Wednesday, the final day to register and be eligible to vote in the Jan. 19 special election between state Attorney General Martha Coakley, a Medford Democrat, and state Sen. Scott Brown, R-Wrentham. The pair are vying to fill the U.S. Senate seat held by Edward M. Kennedy until his death in August.
Low numbers are typical, several local town clerks said. Less typical is the number of votes already received. In towns across the Cape, hundreds of residents have already cast absentee ballots — a sharp increase over past years, town clerks said. In Barnstable, the town clerk's office has already received 485 ballots — about double the usual count two weeks before an election, according to Town Clerk Linda Hutchenrider.
The spike is likely due to the timing of the election in January, when many Cape residents are spending the winter in warmer climates.
"It seems like people are a little more aware and a little more excited about voting this time," said Theresa Bunce, town clerk in Dennis. "Even if they're not here to do it."
capecodonline.com ...
Posted by: Clarice | January 02, 2010 at 02:37 PM
Because it's easier to spot jihadists stateside, I don't see that point of the argument. What would be the constitutional argument, would it be institutionalizing the points in Hassan's powerpoint presentation
Posted by: narciso | January 02, 2010 at 02:57 PM
TM should be pleased - the biofuel subsidy (which included the paper industry 'black liquor' loophole) was allowed to expire. It may undergo resurrection (watch for mill closings) but Climategate might force some members of the Congressional Clown Corps to disavow belief in the CO2 Monster.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 02, 2010 at 02:58 PM
"It seems like people are a little more aware and a little more excited about voting this time," said Theresa Bunce, town clerk in Dennis.
I don't consume any local news for the most part but I think the buzz is not in the media but in the grocery store.
The primary was virtually ignored. For a long time if the press did talk about the race, it was to talk about Coakley. I can't tell you how often I heard "the primary is the election because the democrat will win."
I don't think the democrats have any idea how mad people are. Deval Patrick is openly loathed, even by the left. Coakley is uncharasmatic and more of the same. And while Brown has gone viral I'm not convinced that the local press has caught up. I'll have to try and catch some.
At any rate, it certainly is getting exciting.
Posted by: Jane | January 02, 2010 at 03:16 PM
Jane..I am praying for history to be made in MA with a Brown win..it would be the first of many dominoes falling in the "right" direction
clarice...just read your blog post at AT re:
what and when did Obama know about Christmas terror attack---if stuff is being leaked to Newsweek, there has to be a lot of worry among rank and file intelligence--I'm just surprised any liberal media outlet reported on it. And that idiot, Holder, was there, ignoring national security. They have guards and access to info...but what about their sworn duty to defend and protect??? Axe Napolitano, Holder, Brennan--all of them, I say! I miss GW and Cheney so much.
Posted by: glenda | January 02, 2010 at 03:37 PM
It just gets worse and worse, from this other AT piece by Moran, re another Newsweek piece, in the LUN. Ths subject of the butt bomber, for lack of a more discrete term, briefed Brennan,
Posted by: narciso | January 02, 2010 at 03:46 PM
Just heard a Rush replay in which he played the tape of Obama saying he'd always been a bit leery of the word "victory" because it "evokes images of Emperor Hirohito coming down to the USS Missouri to sign the surrender documents."
How can Obama believe that such an event occurred?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | January 02, 2010 at 03:50 PM
How could Americans have been so dumb as to vote for a person who believed that such an event occurred?
Posted by: pagar | January 02, 2010 at 04:05 PM
Pagar,
The vast majority of Americans believe[d] that taxing air will drive away the CO2 Monster. Vast fortunes have been and are still being made on the credulity of the gullible. It's not as if there was a widely available source of reliable information concerning the Unicorn Rider.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 02, 2010 at 04:32 PM
He not only believed such an event occurred but bowed deeply to Hirohito's son to recognize his own supplication.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 02, 2010 at 04:34 PM
I don't know if this will help or hurt"
Scott Brown files ethics complaint in Senate race
BOSTON - Republican Senate hopeful Scott Brown has filed a complaint with the State Ethics Commission after a report that a union backing rival Martha Coakley used state resources to urge workers to volunteer for Coakley's campaign.
The report by FOX25 said the Service Employees International Union used state computers and e-mail addresses to direct state employees to volunteer for Coakley, the Democratic state attorney general.
Coakley's campaign referred questions to the attorney general's office. A spokeswoman said the attorney general's office has received the letter from Brown's attorney and will review it before commenting.
The SEIU did not immediately return a call for comment.
~~~
Coakley is of course, the AG.
Posted by: Jane | January 02, 2010 at 04:35 PM
I'm reading Newsweek's article about the undie bomber, and I've come across this line:
He also worried about girls. "Lowering his gaze" like a proper Islamic boy when a girl passed by didn't seem to help, nor did fasting, he complained.
And it's really neither here nor there but I still find it odd that Obama used to fast every Sunday.
Posted by: MayBee | January 02, 2010 at 04:37 PM
I never knew that MayBee.
Posted by: Jane | January 02, 2010 at 04:43 PM
Jane:
From Dreams From My Father (Page 120):
Posted by: MayBee | January 02, 2010 at 04:48 PM
Under water grottos, caverns
Filled with apes
That eat figs.
Stepping on the figs
That the apes
Eat, they crunch.
The apes howl, bare
Their fangs, dance,
Tumble in the
Rushing water,
Musty, wet pelts
Glistening in the blue.
Yep.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | January 02, 2010 at 04:55 PM
That still beats Al Gore's global warming poetry. I thought Hugh Hewitt was going to bust a gut laughing at Al artistry right before Christmas.
Posted by: Gmax | January 02, 2010 at 05:28 PM
it was simply a ‘marker’ placed in the U.S. Senate version of the bill and assured the attorney general that it would be ‘fixed,’
Didn't Nelson say at the time the 'marker" was added that he wouldn't vote for the final bill if the House changed the Senate bill ? ... so how does it get 'fixed' ?
Posted by: Neo | January 02, 2010 at 05:38 PM
I seem to have some comuter virus we are trying to correct so I will not be sending or responding to emails until we have this resolved.
Carry on
Posted by: clarice | January 02, 2010 at 05:40 PM
*comPuter vius* (Damnit)
Posted by: clarice | January 02, 2010 at 05:41 PM
*viRus* (Double damnit)
Posted by: clarice | January 02, 2010 at 05:42 PM
Perhaps there is some implicit agreement that the Dems have running under the radar.
There sure is: "Let's screw 'em all while we can; once we control who lives and dies, they won't dare boot us out of office!"
Posted by: Rob Crawford | January 02, 2010 at 05:43 PM
There are reports that the absentee voting in Mass are up in an unprecedented way.
Well, we know ACORN is getting its voice heard.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | January 02, 2010 at 05:47 PM
Interesting question: What Lies at the Heart of "Avatar"? And good news comes with the answer--we can all have some of that good stuff, free!
Posted by: anduril | January 02, 2010 at 05:50 PM
Didn't Nelson say at the time the 'marker" was added that he wouldn't vote for the final bill if the House changed the Senate bill ? ... so how does it get 'fixed'?
I took Nelson's memo to mean the "fix" would be for all the states to get the same Medicaid sweetheart deal NE got. That's certainly what Tom Harkin thinks will happen. And I took Nelson's warning about the House changing the Senate bill to be mainly about the abortion funding faux-solution he took credit for.
Posted by: DebinNC | January 02, 2010 at 06:11 PM
I took Nelson's memo to mean the "fix" would be for all the states to get the same Medicaid sweetheart deal NE got.
Isn't that just stupid? So the feds will tax us more rather than the states taxing us more. Nelson isn't telling the truth methinks.
Posted by: Jane | January 02, 2010 at 06:18 PM
Clarice,
Try malwarebytes. It did wonders for me.
Posted by: Jane | January 02, 2010 at 06:18 PM
it's all about plausible deniability with these clowns. The fix is in with almost all of them these days.
Posted by: matt | January 02, 2010 at 06:19 PM
I thought Aristotle determined that politics correctly practiced was a process that led to clarity, understanding, and sound governance.
Well, Aristotle also thought heavy objects fell faster than light ones. But just to be fair, he probably has an out on "correctly practiced.."
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | January 02, 2010 at 06:48 PM
Doesn't Nelson still have to vote for the bill, even if the Cornhusker Kickback is removed or struck down, just to save face?
Posted by: Extraneus | January 02, 2010 at 06:51 PM
No clue that I can find how many died in Auto accidents in the US in 2009. WHY?
(1) France is smaller.
(2) France is one country with a bureaucracy that dates back to Napoleon, instead of 50.
(3) France is reporting the count by the news bureaus rather than formal statistics.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | January 02, 2010 at 06:54 PM
Do people drive on the left in NZ?
Yes, and I've been scared a couple times that way myself.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | January 02, 2010 at 06:55 PM
How can Obama believe that such an event occurred?
because all little Japanese guys in morning coats look alike to him.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | January 02, 2010 at 06:58 PM
Blocked, I see.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | January 02, 2010 at 07:11 PM
Jane, is this you?...via Instapundit
A READER SENDS THIS PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION:
Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives, and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States .
Posted by: Janet | January 02, 2010 at 07:13 PM
If Nelson's assertion to the SC AG is essentially a mea culpa/confession then the Dems intend to back channel a public option via Medicaid. Easy to fund. easy to demagogue the GOP. Brillaint actually. Gotta hand it to those safe seat Dems that conjured this one up. Socialized medicine by bait and switch.
Posted by: BobS | January 02, 2010 at 07:19 PM
That was the plan from the get-go, BobS. Always has been. Remember this little clip at the LUN?
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | January 02, 2010 at 07:30 PM
I think Aristotle also believed that men had more teeth than women. It has always struck me as odd that he didn't check that one out for himself, although maybe he did with a sample size of one from each gender and drew an outlier.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | January 02, 2010 at 07:38 PM
DOT:
I wonder if women had any wisdom teeth then;>)
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vjnjagvet | January 02, 2010 at 07:42 PM
I'm ducking, I'm ducking.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vjnjagvet | January 02, 2010 at 07:42 PM
Michael Horowitz at Defensive Computing discusses:
Why every Windows user should have a Linux Live CD,
and why
Every Windows XP user should drop their rights. That refers to a free security program for XP called DropMyRights.
Posted by: anduril | January 02, 2010 at 07:51 PM
Wasn't "Call of the Corndogs" an H.P. Lovecraft story?
Posted by: Rob Crawford | January 02, 2010 at 07:54 PM
A cursory Google yielded this:
"There may be no accounting for Aristotle's claim that men have more teeth than women, since on average they are the same. On the other hand, with the variation in third molar [wisdom teeth] eruption it is quite possible that the women available for Aristotle to examine might have -- by chance -- had fewer teeth."
Posted by: Danube of Thought | January 02, 2010 at 07:57 PM
Jane, because my husband sometimes uses my computer for business reasons we have a corporate version of Symantec on my computer. It needs to be compatible with the firm system. It;s the weekend and his IT guy seems engaged. He'll be able to resolve this quickly I think. Symantec scanned my stuff and says everything's disables or quarantined but some other companies to which I do not subscribe seem to keep popping up warning me of a virus and preventing me from using the computer.
Posted by: clarice | January 02, 2010 at 08:02 PM
WSJ on how Porkulus will prevent states that took the money from remaining solvent, unlike Indiana and Texas whose governors refused the money. The new Medicaid expansion is a ticking timebomb.
Posted by: DebinNC | January 02, 2010 at 08:11 PM
Clarice,
We had the same problem on one of my husband's machines. We also use Symantec software.
Malabytes does work with Norton and is a good program to use on this virus. Try scanning with Malabytes and then do a norton boot scan. Once you are rid of the virus turn the firewall setting up. It is a pain but less painfull then the virus.
Posted by: Mary | January 02, 2010 at 08:21 PM
A graph is worth a thousand words....
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/assets_c/2010/01/monthly_approval_index_december_2009.php
Posted by: ben | January 02, 2010 at 08:23 PM
Thanks, Mary..I am able to use my husband's laptop and when I speak to the IT guy, I'll suggest that. As we are hooked into their system I donn't want to do any accidental infecting.
Posted by: clarice | January 02, 2010 at 08:48 PM
Janet,
No and I can't find who it is. I actually asked to have it embedded in YOU TOO this AM. I've been searching for the author for awhile.
It's great isn't it?
Posted by: Jane | January 02, 2010 at 09:09 PM
I have Symantec as well Clarice. You can use malwarebytes with it.
Posted by: Jane | January 02, 2010 at 09:10 PM
Thanks..Jane.
Posted by: clarice | January 02, 2010 at 09:16 PM
The only sensible observation in Diana West's column is that the idea of mounting a battle against creeping sharia has barely crossed the Western radar and that we neglect the fierce urgency of that now to our peril. Too bad she didn't have anything other than strawmen, counterfactual assertions, false choices and non sequitors in her quiver. Just for starters, someone should tell her that the folks balking at stringent visa requirements, securing our borders and drilling for our own oil, are not the hawks. Outside of perfectly reasonable philosophic qualms, West might have more luck selling the idea of halting Islamic immigration altogether, if the idea weren't so frequently rooted in other purist agendas, and if "wartime restrictions" weren't a fatuous substitute for "bureaucratic nightmares."
If only our policy makers would spend a little time "examining a photo of armed Taliban on an Afghan hill," eh? They too might be inspired to eliminate Iran's nuclear capabilities, "destroy jihadist actors, camps and havens wherever and whenever needed," by extricating our troops from the Islamic world (Murtha lives!) ASAP and then "shore up liberty in the West," with a new, improved, Great Western Wall of China.
Emphasizing that you didn't bold the Bush whacking swipe was nice touch, anduril! It might have won you some points for restraint, if you weren't such an apologist for Iran.
Posted by: JM Hanes | January 02, 2010 at 09:27 PM
Jane:
Here's a link to the item at Instapundit with the proposed amendment quote from "a reader." You might try emailing Glenn Reynolds to ask about crediting the source. Wouldn't hurt to include a link to YOU TOO -- just to provide the appropriate context, of course! :-)
Posted by: JM Hanes | January 02, 2010 at 09:36 PM
How can Obama believe that such an event occurred?
And even if the totally implausible did occur, how could he not believe in using the word victory anyway? I mean, even if Hirohito had signed the surrender, what difference would it make? It's victory, damnit. It is a desirable thing to triumph over a worldwide menace. Unless you're a freaking pacifist, that is.
Really, that one remark tells you everything you need to know about Obama's foreign policy views, past present and future.
Posted by: Porchlight | January 02, 2010 at 09:42 PM
Yes that is too broadbrush an indictment, Iran has a proWestern population, but the Council of Guardians practice velayat al fagih, 'rule by clerics' Pakistan has the ISI
and the madrassa network, but Sharia isn't the law of the land, yet
Posted by: narciso | January 02, 2010 at 09:48 PM
except in the tribal areas, narciso......which keep on expanding....
Posted by: matt | January 02, 2010 at 10:28 PM
That is the problem, Matt, which FOB Chapman was trying to deal with, which seems to have heen dealt a fatal blow.
it seems of all the locations, Yemen seems to be the worst possible theatre of operations, a corrupt oppressive anti democratic regime
Posted by: narciso | January 02, 2010 at 10:33 PM
Good morning JOMer's,
Everybody talks about a Happy New Year but nobody does anything about it.
Well I'm here to change that, so somewhat like the Tibetan Monks in Arthur C Clarke's famous short story, "The 9 Billion Names of God", (intent on compiling those names on a supercomputer and not leaving one out) I've decided to go around the planet this year doing an offering to the various dieties for a Happy New Year.
This morning will be ">http://www.panoramio.com/photo/717170"> The Hindu's, here at the Sri Mariamman Temple in Singapore. (some nice photo's at the link). A banana I think should do it.
Rest assured I've already done a Chinese Temple, but will do another later today on Temple Street, plus a Mosque, an Armenian Church, and a very pretty ">http://sg.pagenation.com/sin/Thai%20Buddhist%20Temple_103.829_1.2784_1965.pix"> Thai Buddhist Temple.
The Japanese and Korean dieties will be well taken care of by trips end, and back home I'll be able to hit the Russian Orhodox, as we've got a few small onion domed churches in town. So that's a pretty good start I think.
And I should be able to pacify the Babylonian and Egyptian dieties on my visit to their exhibits at the Loeuvre next week, and the Hawaiian and South Pacific gods should be doable if I can wangle a Sydney trip anytime soon and pacify the DreamTimer's in a walkabout.
So this pretty much hits the bunch of them, with the exception of the Central and South American dieties. I'm not hugely concerned with the Aztec's Xipetotec, nor the Incan's Sun God's though they would be nice to propitiate if anybody's visiting south of the border, but what we really need is for some JOMer to please pull a Cancun trip, and do the honors to the Mayan's Quetzalcoatl at Chichen-Itza, before he ends the world in 2012, a couple of months ahead of when Gordon Browne's Climate Catastrophe does the same thing. Any volunteers?
Posted by: daddy | January 02, 2010 at 10:39 PM
daddy, we need to put a gps chip in you.
Posted by: clarice | January 02, 2010 at 10:46 PM
clarice-
I think there is a beer drainage app you can load into Google Earth that might help.
I'm curious if he flies over the "Ghost" fleets, aka the container/freighter/tanker fleets that have been "at anchor" for close to a year. Economic schemers want to know.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | January 02, 2010 at 10:59 PM
and I hope it wasn't my mail that launched you into blue screen of deathdom.
No attachments from me in that one.
I hope it cleans up well.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | January 02, 2010 at 11:14 PM
I'm sure it wasn't, mel. It appeared yesterday but I believe Symantec contained or quarantined it and then it struck again early today and I can't get it off.. haven't tried the malwarebyte solutin though I mentioned it to the IT guy who's working on a solution.
Posted by: clarice | January 02, 2010 at 11:18 PM
ooh, daddy..
if you're home by the 7th, definitely go to the Russian Orthodox--it's the day the orthodox celebrate Christmas. It starts with a beautiful midnight mass, marches around the church, candles, incense, beautiful chanting. We stand throughout, in worship for the Christ child. It is quite stirring, actually.
Posted by: glenda | January 02, 2010 at 11:18 PM
Melinda,
Meant to comment on that. Arrived about 7:00 AM yesterday from the NorthEast. Sun wasn't up full yet, but visibility was very good, and hundreds of large vessels were dotted all over the straits and all over the coastlines.
It's always very cluttered here ship traffic wise, but it appeared more clobbered than normal to me. Not enough vis though to tell if these were mainly empty, so riding high in the water. That I couldn't tell.
Weather is gorgeous and garlic prawns are killer. Another full day and night awaits of being absolutely useless. Wish you were here.
Posted by: daddy | January 02, 2010 at 11:26 PM
Oooh, clarice, that reminds me, the spouse's computer choked on a bunch "O'Business" and I had to clean up a bunch of things, yesterday, Jan. 1, 2010.
Obviously, there were "time bombs" out there. I blame hit, because he's not here, and working,. Fitting , I think. Like the "spaghetti test".
Problems here, The Beeb is broadcasting the end of David Tennant as "The Doctor", of Doctor Who, of course.
G'night all.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | January 02, 2010 at 11:34 PM
daddy-
Was the fleet larger, or the same, as the last time through?
I'll answer later, the alarm jumps early tomorrow.
Now it's really G'night.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | January 02, 2010 at 11:43 PM
Sorry Mel, can't be more specific. I just know that as we were ariving from a 100 miles out or so you could see lights on the ships in the staits which made them very noticeable. Then as we got closer and dawn started breaking, the ship-lights dimmed and you could simply see hundreds of large ships in all directions. Remembering you and Rick's comments about mothballed tankers I brought up the topic with my partner and we scanned left and right as well as possible and there were hundreds, but I don 't want to go overboard, and would simply say that anecdotally it appeared there were as many or more than I've ever remembered seeing.
If I was able to view traffic in Subic Bay Philippines I'd be more help because I'm much more familiar with what regular ship traffic there looks like, and as I understand it that's another current holding pattern for empty cargo ships.
Posted by: daddy | January 03, 2010 at 12:13 AM
Check.
Posted by: JM Hanes | January 03, 2010 at 01:33 AM
Good morning, JMH. What do you make of yesterday's remarkable coincidence of palindromic and Palindrama?
Posted by: Elliott | January 03, 2010 at 01:55 AM
Good morning, Elliott! Afraid Quassandra's slate has pulled a blank. Are you enjoying your New Year?
Posted by: JM Hanes | January 03, 2010 at 02:44 AM
Good morning JMH and Elliott,
Off to the pool now for sun-tanning, but my guess JMH is that that is one of the smaller pyramids of Tikal. Visted the place for 1 week in 1976 when it took a week by bus almost from Guatemala City, and Cancun and Cozumel didn't yet exist. Was still way off in the sticks and adventurous and beautiful. Did I guess right?
Posted by: daddy | January 03, 2010 at 02:56 AM
Had an image much like this from when tramping around Lamani in Belize but dang if I can find it.

Posted by: glasater | January 03, 2010 at 04:12 AM
Clarice:
Decent sour cherry canned in glass jars could be obtained all year-round in Russian food shops. It is good enough for pies and Ukrainian cherry varenics.
Be sure also to buy Georgian Adjica and Khmeli-Suneli, along with fiery Russian mustard.
U-pick seasonal black currant could be frozen for whole winter. It holds the aroma quite well.
And try this: gently heat regular buttermilk, and filter over cheesecloth to get superb cottage cheese. Do not overheat, or it will be dry. Add some fatty sour cream, frozen black currant, and homemade raspberry preserve (fresh raspberry grinded with bit of sugar; it holds in fridge fresh for month or two).
Posted by: AL | January 03, 2010 at 06:29 AM
sounds wonderful. We have many ethnic grocery stores here but I don't recall any Russian ones. Maybe when I travel to Pennsylvania sometime or Ohio.
Posted by: clarice | January 03, 2010 at 07:42 AM
O-y, Clarice, specialty Russian food stores are everywhere in N. America. They carry a ot of unusual foodstuff, from Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Poland, etc. Just Google “Russian food store Boston” or any other location.
Posted by: AL | January 03, 2010 at 09:04 AM