From the Longfellow classic:
The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere
Listen my children and you shall hear
Of the midnight ride of Paul Revere,
On the eighteenth of April, in Seventy-five;
Hardly a man is now alive
Who remembers that famous day and year.
From the Times corrections:
An article in the Escapes pages on Jan. 1 about visiting Boston in the winter, which described modern and historical sites, misstated the year of Paul Revere’s famous ride. It was 1775, not 1776.
How soon they forget.
Yes, this would be even better if they did a story on New Orleans and mentioned how Jackson beat the British army there in 1812.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 09, 2010 at 09:58 AM
I resemble that remark:
In eighteen-fourteen we took a little trip
Along with Colonel Jackson down the might Mississipp'
We took a little bacon and we took a little beans
And we caught the bloody British in the town of New Orleans
Posted by: Johnny Horton | January 09, 2010 at 10:00 AM
That's an Obama-like error.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | January 09, 2010 at 10:12 AM
I doubt Obama ever even heard of Revere.
Posted by: Clarice | January 09, 2010 at 10:15 AM
Good news!
Dirty Harry continues to sink in polls.
Posted by: centralcal | January 09, 2010 at 10:22 AM
I doubt Obama ever even heard of Revere.
ha ha ha ha ha
Posted by: MayBee | January 09, 2010 at 10:29 AM
Plus, the Obamas seem not to know which hand to use during the Pledge.....
Posted by: glasater | January 09, 2010 at 11:14 AM
glasater: Don't they both look unbelievably awkward and stupid? My gawd!
Posted by: centralcal | January 09, 2010 at 11:31 AM
They have shown a contempt for Tea Party goers, that borders on obscene, so why should
this surprise us?
Posted by: narciso | January 09, 2010 at 11:34 AM
glasater,
Is that a real photo or has that been shopped???? Surely they can't be that stupid!!????
Posted by: tea anyone | January 09, 2010 at 11:36 AM
"Surely they can't be that stupid!!????"
Their intelligence is consonant with Michelle's "beauty" but, if that photo hasn't been reversed, it belongs next to Bozo's unsubtle finger gestures.
Neither of them could climb onto a low Chicago curb without a ladder.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 09, 2010 at 11:42 AM
Well, most people wear their wedding rings on the left hand, so I have my doubts that photo was reversed. Maybe photoshopping allows more manipulation than a simple reversal.
Posted by: peter | January 09, 2010 at 11:44 AM
The photo was sent to me via email and the message did point out that it couldn't have been a 'mirror' image 'cause look at where the rings are on the hands--plus Zero's coat is buttoned correctly..
I know some about photoshopping and although DaveinMA may be the expert here--I would say it would be pretty difficult to make an image this authentic through manipulation.
And CC--yeah the expression on the faces is a real "study" isn't it?
Like--what a chore to have to show a little patriotism.....
Posted by: glasater | January 09, 2010 at 11:46 AM
Glasater,
They both need "I'm with stupid." bubble captions over their pointy heads.
PS - thanks for clarifying the probability that it isn't a p-shop.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 09, 2010 at 11:51 AM
It would be a pretty good photo for a caption contest wouldn't it?
:-)
Posted by: glasater | January 09, 2010 at 11:55 AM
Sorry, but it is photoshopped. Men's suits don't button that way. They reversed the photo and shopped the rings on the right ring fingers.
But the facial expressions are still accurately stupid.
Fake, but accurate
Posted by: peter | January 09, 2010 at 12:01 PM
Go look in your closet again, peter. Men's jackets have the buttons on the right and the buttonholes on the left.
If it's a photoshop it's a reasonably skillful one.
Posted by: cathyf | January 09, 2010 at 12:11 PM
You're right Peter--I use CS4 and really zoomed into the image.
It appears the buttons on the jacket were "fiddled" with also and is sort of apparent with the rings.
Usually when peoples faces are 'flipped' there are major distortions in the features.
With Zero--he looks the same either way (flipped or not) but with MO flipping does show some distortion.
Posted by: glasater | January 09, 2010 at 12:15 PM
Well I tend to flip (off) both of them.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 09, 2010 at 12:51 PM
Right OL:)
I used to do a bunch of photo restoration until everyone and their dog learned how to do it--so that's why the "flipping" thing is something I notice..
Posted by: glasater | January 09, 2010 at 01:10 PM
Paul Krugman is protesting the Ride of Paul Revere and blaming Bush for the lack of preparation.
Henry Louis Gates said it was racist.
Johny Kerry said "huh"?
Posted by: matt | January 09, 2010 at 01:29 PM
I heard last night, on Lars Larsen, that there were going to be cuts to the funding for MWR on military posts.
I've looked high and low today and can't find anything about it. Anyone know something?
Posted by: Soylent Red | January 09, 2010 at 01:50 PM
Obama might remember the Indonesian tale of Moo-too-too and the Giant (It takes a country er, a village to feed the government, er, the giant). I'm sure Barry identifies with the giant. LUN
Posted by: Frau Lachsack | January 09, 2010 at 01:52 PM
SR-
Some details here.
Posted by: RichatUF | January 09, 2010 at 02:02 PM
It appears the buttons on the jacket were "fiddled" with also and is sort of apparent with the rings.
I think there are a few other indicia of flipping in addition to the suspicious appearance of the rings and the area where the Obama's coat overlaps.
The knot of Obama's tie is invariably tilted in the direction opposite to that of the altered image. The part in Michelle Obama's hair is not on the usual side of her head. The same applies to her distinctive right eye.
Posted by: Elliott | January 09, 2010 at 02:16 PM
I did hear they were cutting back funding for Tri-Care in the health care bill, Soylent.
Posted by: matt | January 09, 2010 at 02:38 PM
Yes, Elliot, a blogger called Cripes Suzette has often blogged about Michelle's "little eye" which is her right eye. Also the mole on the left side of Obama's face, (viewer's right) has been airbrushed.
Posted by: peter | January 09, 2010 at 03:02 PM
Elliot--Along with what you mention is the lapel pin.
Someone took great pains with the detail. So the lesson learned is...don't trust pictures:-) Not really.....but......
Posted by: glasater | January 09, 2010 at 03:02 PM
The sad thing is a photoshop is effective because it's entirely plausible these two numbskulls wouldn't know any better than to use their left hands.
BTW is a 'little eye' the same as a wonky eye?
Posted by: Ignatz | January 09, 2010 at 03:07 PM
I like Barack because he is light skinned with no negro dialect. Michelle on the other hand...
LUN
Posted by: Harry Reid | January 09, 2010 at 03:19 PM
Ooops, LUN. I was laughing so hard I forgot.
Posted by: Harry Reid | January 09, 2010 at 03:20 PM
That little eye came when she was watching the Olympics on her father's lap at the age of 19.
Posted by: peter | January 09, 2010 at 03:21 PM
I bet if you asked them, on what date did the historic battles at Concord and Lexington take place on, they'd get that wrong too!
A little more on Longfellow's poem.
You guys don't miss a trick! If this isn't the original, it's pretty close to it.
Posted by: Rocco | January 09, 2010 at 06:02 PM
Bingo Rocco:)
You're so good......
Posted by: glasater | January 09, 2010 at 10:05 PM
Good on you for digging up the photo, Rocco!
I'm sure it began life on the White House Photo stream, although you won't find it there now. On the one I grabbed from an earlier thread, the JPeg title (4258908600_1e6e9f032b_o.jpg) and page source URL formats were right, but that's about it. When I zoomed in on the buttons, and upped the contrast, it was pretty clear that someone was doing some mucking around.
Pretty funny stuff. I expect a lot of photos will be disappeared from the Flickr site, once an adult actually starts minding the store. That's a typical sort of White House PR 2.0 progression, isn't it?
Posted by: JM Hanes | January 09, 2010 at 11:07 PM
Apologies in advance to any blondes out there...
During a recent password audit, it was found that a blonde was using the following password: MickeyMinniePlutoHueyLouieDeweyDonaldGoofySacramento When asked why such a long password, she said she was told that it had to be at least 8 characters long and include at least one capital.~
Bada...bing. ::grin::
Posted by: Sue | January 09, 2010 at 11:35 PM