Amidst all the to-ing andf fro-ing about Harry Reid's light-skinned, no Negro dialect comments about Barack Obama, I like this from California Senator Dianne Feinstein:
Mrs. Feinstein also said that "I saw no Democrats jumping out there and condemning Senator Lott."
But several Democrats — including Mrs. Feinstein — did in fact target Mr. Lott after his remarks. "This statement casts a dark shadow over Sen. Lott's ability to be a credible party leader," she said in 2002, according to an Inland Valley Daily Bulletin news story.
Dark shadows? Well, then, the latest flap casts a light-skinned shadow over Reid's leadership prospects.
LET'S GIVE HIM CREDIT FOR CALLING A SPADE A SPADE:
House leader James Clyburn explains that Reid's comments aren't racist since they came from a loyal Democrat:
Representative James Clyburn of South Carolina, the No. 3 Democrat in the House, was among the black leaders who received a call from Mr. Reid. Mr. Clyburn said that Mr. Reid should be judged on the merits of his record to respond to diversity and to advance the president’s agenda.
“I am one of those who wish to one day live in a color-blind nation,” Mr. Clyburn said. “But the fact is that none of us do today.”
If its not a problem, why is Reid apologizing so much?
I think the apology makes it racist. Otherwise his statements were pedestrian political chat.
Posted by: lonetown | January 11, 2010 at 08:34 AM
I think it is interesting that "negro" is now the "n" word. Someone (Sue maybe) talked yesterday about how we have morphed from "negro" to "black" to "African American" in her (and my) lifetime.
"Negro" was not a slur when I was growing up. I made the transition to "black" but have not to "African American" because at some point it all seems so PC silly.
Still, I cannot imagine how out of touch Harry Reid is to use the phrase "negro dialect". He's an old 70 year old who has clearly spent no time at all in the real world. Time for that to change.
Posted by: Jane | January 11, 2010 at 08:44 AM
Mrs. Feinstein also said that "I saw no Democrats jumping out there and condemning Senator Lott."
Oh, I guess if you don't count yourself and remain blind and deaf to what anyone else from your Party said...
Posted by: LTC John | January 11, 2010 at 08:45 AM
I made the transition to "black" but have not to "African American" because at some point it all seems so PC silly.
Not to mention that you run the risk, as pc Mrs Hate has done multiple times, of offending an African by calling him/her an AA.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 11, 2010 at 08:59 AM
And yes, DiFi is a hypocritical idiot...
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 11, 2010 at 09:01 AM
I liked the explanation that Reid's statement was uttered in a "private" conversation, and should have no bearing on national discourse.
The Democratic political leadership in this country has truly, truly gone mad.
Posted by: blastopocles | January 11, 2010 at 09:07 AM
"Negro" was not a slur when I was growing up.
James Watt was forced to resign from the Reagan cabinet, for saying: "I have a black, a woman, two Jews and a cripple. And we have talent." The killer, apparently, was the word "cripple," which was no longer permissible in 1983, though it had been at some point the equivalent of "handicapped."
In any case, the rule is: If you are a Republican and use the wrong name for a group, or say anything deemed "insensitive," you have to resign. If you are a Democrat, an apology will suffice.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 11, 2010 at 09:08 AM
No matter what the "error" made on the right, Liberals demand loudly, resignation. Republicans get in a lather and all join in the call for resignation. Voila, the offender resigns.
No matter what the "error" made on the left, a few Republicans call for reignation, and bunch accept "apologies." The Dems circle the wagons and defend, defend, defend. Voila, the offender stays in place.
Posted by: centralcal | January 11, 2010 at 09:36 AM
If you are a Republican, you are guilty. period.
If you are a Democrat you have a hall pass to say any old stupid, harmful, vicious or racist thing you want and the media and other Democrats double secret swear they won't say a word.
After all, demographically there are more teabaggers in the traditional sense of the word dwelling in the living rooms of the Democratic Party than anywhere else.
Posted by: matt | January 11, 2010 at 09:37 AM
Mercury News last week on "outcry" over Negro being on census:
Question 9 on the census, which asks for a person's race, lists as one of the options: "Black, African Am., or Negro." The controversy arose earlier this week as the Census Bureau started its road tour in New York. ...Sonny Le, a regional spokesman for the Census Bureau, said the term "Negro" has been on the survey for at least 100 years. He said the form is reviewed and analyzed thoroughly by different offices and advisory groups before being finalized. Le said the
decision to keep the term "Negro" on the form was due principally to the fact some older African-Americans still identify themselves by that term. In fact, in the 2000 census, more than 50,000 people chose to write down explicitly that they identified themselves as "Negro" in a section where the census allows people to provide additional information. That number does not include those who checked the box "Black, African-Am., or Negro." "We decided to keep the term, but at the same time, I think it's good for everybody to have this conversation now," Le said. "The census is an evolving process. It's supposed to reflect our country. If enough people do not want the term, we should revisit again whether or not it belongs."
Was it Reid's use of "Negro" and/or his referral to "Negro dialect" that was offensive?
Posted by: DebinNC | January 11, 2010 at 09:44 AM
Barack Obama called for Lott's head. Maybe Feinstein wasn't paying attention to him back then.
I agree that African American is unwieldy, and I think it's falling by the wayside.
Posted by: MayBee | January 11, 2010 at 09:45 AM
DiFi is not an idiot. She's a Dem and therefore she knows that she can twist history with impunity and no pressie will call her on it.
BTW while my computer has been fixed, there remains something hujacking and redirecting my search engines. I've tried Symantec, Spybot and Malwarebytes and those didn't succeed in locating and deleting the installation. I tried going back to an earlier day onmy system but systm restore couldn't go back far enough to matter,
(At some point those of us effected ought to institute a class action suit against these sites to which they are redirected and the ompanies they redirect you to because surely they are in on this perfidy.)
Posted by: Clarice | January 11, 2010 at 09:45 AM
Clarice,
Buy a Mac.
Then go to your local Starbucks and see if they have an articulate, clean young African-American who will bring you a cup of coffee. It will make you feel like a Democrat:)
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 11, 2010 at 09:48 AM
Steve Gilbert at Sweetness & Light says he thinks Clinton's comment was even more racist and is being swept under the rug.
Posted by: Clarice | January 11, 2010 at 09:52 AM
Of course Clinton's comment was more racist. But he and the Hill have been getting away with this crap since Arkansas.
And Obama is so committed to his agenda that he is willing to accept overt racist remarks as part of his job to control you and me. Nothing can bother a narcissist.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 11, 2010 at 09:58 AM
I'm more inclined to give people the benefit of the doubt on these things, Bill and Harry included. Bill's comment (though I haven't seen the exact context) seems more akin to: "See how far we have come."
The problem is the double standard: Republicans not only get hammered for these sorts of statements, but (as with Watt and Lott) frequently have to resign.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 11, 2010 at 10:11 AM
Without further context, I'm not sure Clinton was referring to Obama's race but the fact he had only been in the senate a short time. Lack of experience, if you will. The people bringing Clinton and Kennedy coffee weren't necessarily black. Just sycophants.
Posted by: Sue | January 11, 2010 at 10:14 AM
Reid going down.. News at 11!
Posted by: maryrose | January 11, 2010 at 10:19 AM
jimmyk,
You should know that Clinton made this particular remark to Ted Kennedy in order to attain Teddy's endorsement of Hillary. It was not made as a platitude to the historic achievement of the Democrat party.
OT:
Did you hear about the recent IT audit at Barbara Boxer's office? During the audit they found out that Bab's was using the following password During a recent password audit, it was found that a blonde was using the following password:
MickeyMinniePlutoHueyLouieDeweyDonaldGoofySacramento
When she was asked why such a long password, she said she was told that it had to be at least 8 characters long and include at least one capital.
/snark
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 11, 2010 at 10:19 AM
Darn pasting error:grrrr:
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 11, 2010 at 10:20 AM
jimmy and sue, I'm inclined to give him a reasonable pass--that he was talking about inexperience, not race, but then why was teddy reportedly so offended?
Posted by: Clarice | January 11, 2010 at 10:22 AM
To evaluate whether Clinton's comment was racist, we'd have to know who usually brings him coffee.
An aide, a staffer, or some sort of servant/waiter?
Posted by: MayBee | January 11, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Maybe he recognized too much of himself in that comment.
Posted by: narciso | January 11, 2010 at 10:26 AM
(I suspect that they are hard to find -- a tangle of holding companies, many offshore...)
C'mon, clarice, you're a lawyer, go gettem! ;-)Posted by: cathyf | January 11, 2010 at 10:26 AM
But the companies that advertise on them don't appear to be, cathyf..
Posted by: Clarice | January 11, 2010 at 10:27 AM
People should lay off REID. With him out of the way, the Dems will hold onto that seat. We do not want him to go down. We want him to stand for that seat.
Posted by: squaredance | January 11, 2010 at 10:34 AM
***
Negro wasn't an insult when I was growing up--although the term Black seems more appropriate. But the term African-American seems wrong to me.
***
If it's necessary to refer to skin color--Black American seems better. But just American should be the goal--re: Dr. Reverend Martin Luther King's I HAVE A DREAM speech--he was a real American with a better view of the future for our country.
***
Rocketman
***
Posted by: John Bibb | January 11, 2010 at 10:38 AM
Does it matter that "Negro" was the term regularly used by Martin Luther King?
I'm another who transitioned to "black," but will go no further. (I always keep my eyes peeled for non-Americans being described as African-American, e.g. "Kofi Annan was the first African-American Secretary General."
Someone somewhere will soon describe the panty bomber as an African-American from Nigeria.)
I was actually watching live when former Klansman Robert Byrd use the term "white nigger." A three-day flap; no more.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | January 11, 2010 at 10:42 AM
but then why was teddy reportedly so offended?
I don't know that he was, just some second-hand report alleging it. I think he was inclined to back Obama, no matter what Clinton said or didn't say. The new Camelot didn't just spring up out of nothing, it had the blessing of the Kennedys.
Posted by: Sue | January 11, 2010 at 10:44 AM
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | January 11, 2010 at 10:46 AM
I want to get away from Reid's use of the word Negro and focus on his acknowledgment that Obama was a fake. I love that he added that little bit at the end after saying no Negro dialect unless he wants to.
Posted by: Sue | January 11, 2010 at 10:47 AM
Teddy was offended because he knows only women should bring men coffee, so the men can then "sandwich" them.
Posted by: MayBee | January 11, 2010 at 10:47 AM
Funny .. you don't write with a "Negro dialect"
Posted by: Neo | January 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM
I think you're right, Sue--I think this is something of a slander if it's possible to slander such an odious pair as the Clintons.
Posted by: Clarice | January 11, 2010 at 10:58 AM
Yes Maybee; according to the Olympic swimmer, de wimmens were only worth being driven to drink or into the drink.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 11, 2010 at 10:58 AM
if it's possible to slander such an odious pair as the Clintons
Which makes my longing for them to be back in the WH that much more bizarre.
Posted by: Sue | January 11, 2010 at 11:04 AM
If Clinton comes to Boston Friday, maybe Deval could get him a coffee...light-skim, no sugar.
Posted by: Rocco | January 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM
My youngest child, 11 at the time, was quite concerned that I used the term "Black" instead of AA so she surveyed all of her affected friends to make sure it wasn't a problem. She was quite surprised and relieved to discover that none of her friends thought were uncomfortable with it.
Of course this is the same child who was raised to believe skin color was irrelevant so she was shocked last year to discover others saw skin color as a reason to vote for someone. When her friends asked, she said she knew a few facts they weren't aware of yet.
Posted by: rse | January 11, 2010 at 11:07 AM
Well they seem less odious than their 2.0 counterparts and they are. They are as narcissistic and not as ideological. The same flacks for them, on the economy, foreign policy, flack for Obama.
Posted by: narciso | January 11, 2010 at 11:15 AM
People should lay off REID. With him out of the way, the Dems will hold onto that seat. We do not want him to go down. We want him to stand for that seat.
Agree. But if the pressure on him can somehow derail Obamacare in the short term, I'm for it.
How's that for cynical political calculation.
Posted by: Porchlight | January 11, 2010 at 11:16 AM
(I agree with squaredance, though. We need Reid in there until November!)
Posted by: Extraneus | January 11, 2010 at 11:20 AM
Which makes my longing for them to be back in the WH that much more bizarre.
Ugh; lose that thought quickly. One of the worst aspect of Toonces and Worf is they've made people forget just how loathsome the latter day Snopes family was in the White House.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM
Rasmussen analyzes the three Mass. polls.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | January 11, 2010 at 11:36 AM
Hey Rocco,
Can you email me at [email protected] when you get a chance?
she said she was told that it had to be at least 8 characters long and include at least one capital.
I just tried to read that to Amy. I was laughing so hard I had tears running down my cheeks. I couldn't finish the sentence.
Posted by: Jane | January 11, 2010 at 11:52 AM
--I don't know that he was, just some second-hand report alleging it.--
Well, the other second hand report concerning what Reid said was obviously accurate or he wouldn't be begging forgiveness for it, so I'd say that lends some credence Teddy's reaction to Bubba's comment.
--I think this is something of a slander if it's possible to slander such an odious pair as the Clintons.--
clarice,
Isn't there a concept in the law that one's reputation can already be so low that slander is nearly impossible?
If there isn't there ought to be.
Posted by: Ignatz | January 11, 2010 at 12:07 PM
At least Reid said a real word, not a made up one like Macaca.
(as pointed out by Tops)
Posted by: MayBee | January 11, 2010 at 12:12 PM
so I'd say that lends some credence Teddy's reaction to Bubba's comment
Yes, but you have slime sliming slime. Or some unknown slime quoting slime sliming slime.
Posted by: Sue | January 11, 2010 at 12:17 PM
ignatz, one does have to establish that one had a reputation before being able to claim it ws tarnished by the slander.
Posted by: Clarice | January 11, 2010 at 12:20 PM
Oh. you HAVE to read this post at Ezra Klein's place. The most amazing study ever.
Posted by: MayBee | January 11, 2010 at 12:45 PM
Jane--the link below shouldn't surprise and perhaps you've already seen it but:
Lobbyists for Coakley
Posted by: glasater | January 11, 2010 at 12:45 PM
The most amazing study ever.
Yup. I've always thought racism was the real reason people turned against the war in Iraq too. I'm pretty sure they just weren't willing to talk about it.
Posted by: MikeS | January 11, 2010 at 12:54 PM
Dot:
If you go way down south Caribbean way, don't you dare call them anything other than Jamaicans, Cayman Islanders, Bahamians, etc....Inhabitants of St. Kitt's don't especially like the inhabitants of Nevis, etc. The term Afro-Caribbean is not common and island to island rivalry is very strong.White people just sort of get lumped in as tourists/minorities.
What is sad is that the color of one's skin does matter in Caribbean society. the lighter the skin the higher the caste, even in Cuba.
Posted by: matt | January 11, 2010 at 12:55 PM
MayBee,
That is why I pay no attention to PC crapola. If I name my daughter Butterfly McQueen, and she is white as the driven snow, don't you think some employer will look at her resume and say, Butterfly. Hmmm...next.
Anyway, no offense to any Butterfly McQueens out there. I happen to like the name.
Posted by: Sue | January 11, 2010 at 12:58 PM
The New York Times reports that former Governor and vice president candidate Sarah Palin signed on as a contributor to the Fox News Channel.
Posted by: Neo | January 11, 2010 at 01:03 PM
Yeah, Mike, I can see that study.
Which name do you have more positive feelings for:
Saddam or Michael
Shatha or Elizabeth
The study then took those who preferred the names Michael and Elizabeth, and classified them as racist....
Posted by: MayBee | January 11, 2010 at 01:05 PM
I agree, Sue.
I hope the study used the names Bristol, Track, and Trig.
Posted by: MayBee | January 11, 2010 at 01:06 PM
Thanks Glasater. I had heard that. The drug companies already got their pay hike. It seems like they should want this bill to fail.
Posted by: Jane | January 11, 2010 at 01:23 PM
The study then took those who preferred the names Michael and Elizabeth, and classified them as racist....
But not those who chose Saddam or Shatha? I guess because we know it's impossible for blacks or Arabs to be racist.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 11, 2010 at 01:29 PM
Here's the blurb about the study, for those who don't want to click through:
I find it hilarious.
Posted by: MayBee | January 11, 2010 at 01:35 PM
Were people racist for rejecting Clinton's health care plans in the 90's? Or just when it was credited to Obama in the study?
Posted by: MayBee | January 11, 2010 at 01:42 PM
It's pitiful that blacks, Negroes, African-Americans, coloreds, whatevers are so insane about the issue of controlling what they are called. I remember when the feeble theory of the "power of naming" was birthed by the deconstructionists, or was it political correctionists, in academia and that little world went wild. Now those silly students have grown up to patrol the internet and all discourse and demand the latest "self-naming power expression" be used as if that really means anything at all in terms of producing respect for a group.
Posted by: What's the self-label of the day? | January 11, 2010 at 01:50 PM
Not racist
Obama, as a black candidate, could be successful thanks, in part, to his "light-skinned" appearance and speaking patterns "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one."
Racist
Obama, as a black candidate, could not be successful thanks, in part, to his "dark-skinned" appearance and speaking patterns "with a Negro dialect, unless he didn't want to have one."
Now if he would only straighten his hair...eh Harry?
Posted by: Rocco | January 11, 2010 at 02:02 PM
This pretty much says it all:
So when a Democrat says "Racist!" they really mean "Republican." I know that I'll give all future pronouncements from race baiters who support him the same weight I give similar winges from feminists who supported Bill. (Which is to say: none at all.)Posted by: Cecil Turner | January 11, 2010 at 02:03 PM
Sarah Palin at Fox!
The New York Times will have to follow up on Sunday's story about Ailes. I thought it was pretty fair and they had to admit that Fox News is the cash engine of News Corp. [Well FNC and Avatar].
With Palin there, the only way the profits can go is up, up, and away.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 11, 2010 at 02:06 PM
People should be careful in what they wish for when asking Harry Reid to step down.
Harry is a dolt, but his likely successor, Dick Durbin, or Chuck Schumer, are more insidous dolts.
Posted by: Publius, a.k.a. The Idaho Publius | January 11, 2010 at 02:07 PM
Tyrone and Shaniqua vs. Brett and Jane
OK, I like Tyrone Power more than I like my sister-in-law's ex-husband Brett. And who could not put "Jane" into a positive category?
I'd love to see the complete list of stereotypically black words. I'm guessing "clean", "articulate", "coffee"....
Posted by: bgates | January 11, 2010 at 02:07 PM
Clarice--I don't know if this article will help explain your browser problems but:
Researcher exposes Google spyware connections
The article reminded me of the situation you describe.
Posted by: glasater | January 11, 2010 at 02:35 PM
Oh. you HAVE to read this post at Ezra Klein's place. The most amazing study ever.
Is it wrong to use the provided "report abuse" links to flag the "all conservatives are racists" comments as "hate speech"?
I like to think of it as playing by the rules the lefties have written, but...
Posted by: Rob Crawford | January 11, 2010 at 03:48 PM
Anybody know if Don "Nappy Headed Ho" Imus has commented on the racist Harry Reid?
Posted by: daddy | January 11, 2010 at 06:15 PM
Mrs. Feinstein also said that "I saw no Democrats jumping out there and condemning Senator Lott."
... because I had those cucumber slices on my eyes, part of that failed beauty treatment.
Posted by: PD | January 11, 2010 at 09:18 PM
Harry is a dolt, but his likely successor, Dick Durbin, or Chuck Schumer, are more insidous dolts.
Yeah but, Nevada has a Republican Gov who hates Obamacare. So, likely a Republican would be named immediately to replace Harry.
Posted by: MikeS | January 11, 2010 at 09:20 PM
Without further context, I'm not sure Clinton was referring to Obama's race but the fact he had only been in the senate a short time. Lack of experience, if you will. The people bringing Clinton and Kennedy coffee weren't necessarily black. Just sycophants.
Back in Flashman's day, the term for these underlings was "fags."
Posted by: PD | January 11, 2010 at 09:23 PM
I'm not African-American or Black. But I am a Native American, I guess; I was born in country.
Posted by: PD | January 11, 2010 at 09:24 PM
At least Reid said a real word, not a made up one like Macaca.
It's not made up. It refers to monkeys (also spelled "macaque").
Posted by: PD | January 11, 2010 at 09:33 PM
Somebody finally explains how Harry "Hapless" Reid got the slot as Majority Leader:
Posted by: JM Hanes | January 11, 2010 at 09:55 PM
Years ago, before political correctness achhieved a stranglehold on public discourse, comedians used to ridicule liberals who tried to be hyper-sensitive by calling black people "persons of the Negro persuasion."
If you Google that phrase, you can find some comedy routines that would be Quite Unacceptable today.
Posted by: Murgatroyd | January 14, 2010 at 02:31 AM