If runaway costs are the problem, surely price controls are the answer! Barack Obama, channeling his inner Dick Nixon, is set to propose Federal oversight of health insurance price hikes.
Since in the short run there are generally more consumers who can picture themselves winning from this than suppliers who will see themselves as losers, this tactic may help get Obama and the Democrats get past 2010. I'll bet that rent controls were popular when they were adopted in New York City as a temporary measure during World War II.
The long run effects won't be helpful for the insurance industry but they will be good for advancing the interests of the Democratic Party. A key Democratic goal of health reform (as was kicked around during the HillaryCare debacle) is to create a new middle-class entitlement. If this plays out like Social Security it will tie the middle class to their benefactors in the Democratic Party, which will forever position itself as the party of more generous benefits paid for by Someone Else.
A price control board can advance that same goal, since the Democrats can position themselves as the champions of lower prices for all. In the not-so-long run insurer won't be able to make a reasonable profit and will exit the industry, and coverage will be scarce (but cheap!). At that point the collapse of the private market will be offered as further evidence of the desirability of a full government take-over of health care, or at least, the adoption of a stalking-goat "public option".
Oh, well - if price controls are the answer, I guess we have to stop comparing Obama to Carter and start comparing him to Nixon.
Rick, you always give me hope. :)
Posted by: SunnyDay | February 22, 2010 at 08:04 PM
Ha! The image...
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 22, 2010 at 08:06 PM
I must have misunderstood, I thought the trainer was to keep Michelle's a__et looking trim. Where did the herring come in?
Posted by: Pagar | February 22, 2010 at 08:19 PM
I thought the trainer was to keep Michelle's a__et looking trim.
Fat chance
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 22, 2010 at 08:27 PM
That would take David Copperfield performing for Stevie Wonder, Pagar.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | February 22, 2010 at 08:28 PM
There has generally been a national glut of electricity supply for quite a while but it's been a while since I've checked that.
Oh, they're working on that, too. The longer we dick around building windmills, and ignoring actual, ya know, electricity generation, the worse it's gonna be.
Posted by: Pofarmer | February 22, 2010 at 10:11 PM
pagar-
You holding out on red herrings?
Oh, wait...
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 22, 2010 at 10:49 PM
I posted on Teresa Ghardilucci's work back here. The next leg of homework starts at The Brookings Institute and their little project on retirement.
And on that note, I'll fade.
G'night all.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 22, 2010 at 10:56 PM
This is such a great news, it really helps, Your blog is nice and informative. Thanks for the article.
Posted by: College Term Papers | February 23, 2010 at 04:49 AM