Here we Joe again:
I am very optimistic about -- about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration.
First, here's hoping! Second, it is not as if the "Great Achievements" category is overstocked with entries.
Andrew Malcolm of the LA Times redirects his fire:
Joe Biden Update: Iraq one of Obama's "great achievements".
Let's have a to-be-fair moment - as Brooks explained a few days ago or Biden mentioned last night, Biden has been quarterbacking Administration policy on Iraq. So, although I assume Biden would be savvy enough to share the credit, he is really telling the world that Iraq is one of the great achievements of Joe Biden.
Uh huh.
FWIW: I have a vague recollection of a Washington saying popularized by "W" the gist of which was, you can accomplish anything in this town as long as you don't want the credit.
I also have a vague recollection of reminding people that part of the price righties would have to pay for a stable and democratic Iraq would be sharing the credit with Obama. It's great that Biden seems to be committed to that goal, finally (even if it is mainly because everything else they touch has gone south.)
STILL REFLECTING: I figured Obama talked tough about Afghanistan during the campaign because talk is cheap and he needed some cheap cred on national security "toughness".
I also figured that he would escalate in Afghanistan because he was more or less committed to vindicating his world view by losing in Iraq (and blaming Bush!) and didn't want to be the first US President to lose two wars.
But now this Admin is so desperate for a success (and some national security cred) that Iraq must be looking pretty good. And it's Biden's baby, which must gall someone in the White House.
ccal-
No tapes. That's all I ask.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 11, 2010 at 08:05 PM
Jane: STOP SPENDING!
Jane, qualify that. STOP GOVERNMENT SPENDING.
So the businesses and consumers can begin to regain enough confidence to do their own investing and make the purchases they decide to make.
Posted by: sbw | February 11, 2010 at 08:07 PM
--Biden On Iraq--
Shouldn't that be 'Biden on crack'?
Posted by: Ignatz | February 11, 2010 at 08:13 PM
Treasury Auction Lesson Pt. 1
Today's results have some particular points that each auction share and that Treasury traders use. All of them.
Start at the "Interest Rate", which in this example is 4-5/8%. This equates decimally to 4.625%. Note the next line, "High Yield", which reads 4.720%. This, compared to the previous line, is about 0.10% higher, or in the lingo of the market, 10 basis points. 100 basis points is 1%. Ordinarily, traders like to see the difference between these two figures limited to two or three basis points. This difference is always referred to as "the tail", as in the slimy tail of a worm. In the case of today's auction, this is a case of "Uh-oh".
But that is only part of the picture, traders also look at three other dynamics that are a bit more complicated, one of which is becoming as clear as mud, and has all the pros chatting, lately.
Part 2: Bid-to-Cover and Non-competitive bids (to be continued)
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 11, 2010 at 08:21 PM
Merkel will not bail out Greece.http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2010/feb/11/germany-greece-merkel-bailout-euro
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 08:36 PM
LUN
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 08:37 PM
Along with Mel's .pdf is this link:
Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Update: Week Of February 11
This is a site Mel and Rick post links to from time to time.
On another note a wag on a Spengler forum posted this poll:
Should Obama:
Join the GOP now 50% ( 3 )
Join the GOP after the election 50% ( 3 )
Mr Perfect
Posted by: glasater | February 11, 2010 at 08:38 PM
Whoaaaa......
From Clarice's link:
Could we please get Mz Merkel to come over here and run our country for awhile? ::kidding::
Posted by: glasater | February 11, 2010 at 08:43 PM
Soylent,
My fingers are crossed. But I don't get the elephant thing.
Posted by: Malaysia Jane | February 11, 2010 at 08:50 PM
She's no dope. Why should Germany whose workers get to retire 4 years after Greel workers do, subsidize Greece whose workers are presently striking for even more benefits?
I see an international revolt of the ants who are sick of feeding the grasshoppers.
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 08:50 PM
From the Word Detective, Jane:
Dear Word Detective: I've frequently heard a phrase referring to soldiers who have been in combat, or police officers who've been in gun fights and had their lives endangered. Such people are said to have "seen the elephant." Do you know the origin of that phrase? -- Joe Torre, via the internet.
Yes I do, but I can't tell you the answer until you step up and buy a ticket. But you'll also get to see The Bearded Lady and the Human Fly, not to mention Wolf Boy and The Invisible Man, formerly known as Dick Cheney.
As you might infer from that somewhat strange paragraph, the whole story begins with the classic American traveling carnival. Back in the early 19th century, the arrival of such a carnival in a small town was a major occasion, affording the town's residents the opportunity to sample all sorts of exotic attractions, from the grotesque denizens of the sideshow to wild beasts from Africa and Asia that many people at that time had only read of in books. The big draw at many of these shows was an elephant, a far bigger and stranger critter than any animal native to North America, and to go to the carnival without "seeing the elephant" would be like going to the Ohio State Fair without seeing the Butter Cow. (Yes, it's a life-size cow sculpted from butter, sort of a giant advertisement for bypass surgery.)
So ritualized was this small-town pachyderm-mania that by about 1835 "to see the elephant" had become a catch phrase meaning "to experience all that there is to see, to see all that can be endured," with the sense that after having "seen the elephant" there was nothing left to see. A related, more general sense arose a few years later, in which "to have seen the elephant" meant "to be worldly, no longer innocent, to have learned a hard lesson." Many young people of the day who left the country for the big city with stars in their eyes only to experience hardship and disappointment were wryly said to have "seen the elephant" in this sense. And by about 1840, "see the elephant" had acquired the specialized military sense you have heard, meaning "to experience combat for the first time," with the brutal loss of innocence that ordeal conveys.
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 09:00 PM
I don't get the elephant thing.
19th century expression regarding meaningful experience. In military parlance, refers to a combat tour.
So I got that going for me. Which is nice.
Cinderella story, outta nowhere . . .
Posted by: Cecil Turner | February 11, 2010 at 09:03 PM
I hate when that happens.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | February 11, 2010 at 09:05 PM
clarice;
I just blogged some of this. when you tie it into the global financial mess it gets nasty. LUN.
Posted by: matt | February 11, 2010 at 09:09 PM
Well, blow me down. CBS has Ibama at +1, down from their usual +10.
Posted by: PaulL | February 11, 2010 at 09:11 PM
I had to shut down the computer and head for home (yay) before I could ask the very same question Jane asked - about the elephant.
Thank you, Clarice, once again for the education and Cecil for the cliff notes version.
Never heard the phrase before.
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 09:11 PM
This too big to fail carp is getting to me. I think at some point we all have to stop enabling profligate behavior and offer up some tough love as Merkel is doing.
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 09:12 PM
matt, that's another really good blog. Why not submit it to EDITOR@AMERICANTHINKER.COM ? It deserves a wider readership.
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 09:15 PM
This would really send her round the bend.
She's already so far around the bend that all the animals up ahead are stampeding back.
I'm more concerned that in this new universe Captain Hate may be a TarHeel Fan and God forbid, I may actually pull for Dook!
I've cheered for the Rat's Pack and the Holes a few times in the past; always against the very rare teams I've hated more. I believe that every time I've cheered for that team in the pussy blue unis they've won; let's see once against Digger Phelps Irish, when they beat the Hoyas, the Illini and Meechigan State but definitely not when Al McGuire got deep inside Deanie's dome.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 11, 2010 at 09:17 PM
Clarice,
I'm not sure Merkel is going to be able to walk the talk. She may have been assured by German banks that they can survive the hit but the French (and the Swiss, although they aren't in the EU) may have a completely different view.
I suggest that we adopt "If you're Too Big to Fail, you're Too Large to Live" going forward. I have a little list...
Posted by: Rick Ballard | February 11, 2010 at 09:19 PM
clarice-
I had the exact same discussion with "the powers that be", we agreed that if Bear Stearns had been allowed to "wink out" over that spring weekend in '08, all this would be different.
On to lesson Part 2.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 11, 2010 at 09:20 PM
I think the EU may crumble if Greece cannot alter course, Rick. It was a mistake to let in countries like Greece and Spain in the absence of a means for the richer states to enforce fiscal restraint on the big spenders.
Has anyone seen what EU Referendum has to say about this? I'd be curious.
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 09:22 PM
Good job, Matt.
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 09:23 PM
I read John Stossell's syndicated column in the op-ed pages of my local paper. One thing that jumped out at me was his claim that 60% of the country do not pay any income taxes. Does that sound right?
Posted by: Sue | February 11, 2010 at 09:23 PM
It does, Sue...although most of them are too dumb to realie that confusing their FICA withholdings as income tax.
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 09:29 PM
Good one, Matt. Thanks again.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 11, 2010 at 09:33 PM
Powerline has a great video from the Minnesotans for Global Warming. Highly recommended, particularly if you like the Who.
Here is a link to the underlying site with the video.
Posted by: DrJ | February 11, 2010 at 09:36 PM
Clarice,
It's going to crumble anyway. It's the League of Nations facing Hitler and Mussolini or the UN cracking down [u-pick-em]. Merkel may be picking up on internal sentiment and be quite willing to set the exchange rate for the NeueDeutschMark starting tomorrow. It really would push France and Switzerland right over a cliff if she did.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | February 11, 2010 at 09:38 PM
I really don't think Germany can do much more--they were burdened with the costs of taking over East germany; they have lent a lot to the Eastern Eurpean countries..her citizens don't seem interested in working harder so Zorba can keep dancing and drinking retsina.
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 09:41 PM
Wow. http://wcbstv.com/local/governor.christie.freezes.2.1487727.html>I'm impressed.
Dems are furious. Anytime you piss of a democrat, you are heading in the right direction. Go Christie!
Posted by: Sue | February 11, 2010 at 09:42 PM
60 might be slightly high, Sue. Last time I blew a gasket on that it was 54% but that was probably year old data. I'll look for the current one.
I wish more people would grasp the seriousness of that in terms of maintaining a stable, productive society. Philosophers for centuries have noted that when a majority of a population can vote themselves the property of others, it will not end well.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 11, 2010 at 09:43 PM
Oh man, that typo is bad. Anytime you piss **off** a democrat.
Posted by: Sue | February 11, 2010 at 09:43 PM
"If you're Too Big to Fail, you're Too Large to Live"
Rick:
That would fit in nicely with Michelle Obama's obesity campaign that says "To Big is a threat to national security".
I am so confused. :(
Posted by: Ann | February 11, 2010 at 09:47 PM
OL,
I knew it was a large number, but 60%? And part of that number came from Bush's tax cuts, that took millions off the tax roll. Regardless of what democrats say. Everyone should pay "some" income taxes. No wonder raising income taxes doesn't bother most people. They aren't paying them anyway.
Posted by: Sue | February 11, 2010 at 09:48 PM
Anytime you piss **off** a democrat.
I was thinking ON.
Posted by: MikeS | February 11, 2010 at 09:51 PM
Hey good news about Merkel and Greece. The price of baklava should plummet.
Anyone hear any news at all out of Iran today? I know they had another lock down of the internet and there were some riots, but that's all I've seen reported.
Posted by: Soylent Red | February 11, 2010 at 09:57 PM
I guess I should have said: Opa!
Posted by: Soylent Red | February 11, 2010 at 09:58 PM
Grasshopper wants to know what the elephant sees?
I am guessing this one just saw Michelle's backside. :)
Posted by: Ann | February 11, 2010 at 10:00 PM
check out gateway pundit for pics and updates, Soylent.
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM
Treasury Auction Lesson Part 2:
The two other most common metrics used to gauge the strength of a Treasury Auction are the Bid-to-Cover ratio and the Non-competitive bids. Back to the results from today.
The Non-competitive bid is from the TreasuryDirect Program that Rick so kindly pointed out earlier. It, by definition, is those participants who wish to participate in the auction, but are not allowed to bid. They RECEIVE the resulting yield awarded by the auction process, not the "High Yield" awarded to competitive bidders, in this case 4.625%, not the 4.720% awarded and a 10 basis point haircut over the life of the bond.
The Bid-to-Cover ratio is just that, the face value of bids compared to the face value of those accepted. Today's Bid-to-Cover ratio, which is located in the footnotes of the results page, was 2.36 (always assumed to be reflective of i.e. 2.36:1, a proper ratio descriptor). The prior month's ratio was 2.68, which, in comparison, shows less interest in this auction, but needs to be compared to a month trailing average. Bloomberg uses 10 months at 2.48, but they are "special", most everyone uses 12 months and that's on my desk tab in the office, but was only a bit lower. This tells me that the year end auction was probably something weird and there is slightly higher interest in the 30 yr. than before today.
The last Non-competitive bid was $17 million, this was $19 million, which is no biggie.
As an aside, and this is why I'm subjecting you all to this data. Earlier comments referred to a "failed" auction. A failed auction is where, say, $25 Billion of 10 yr. notes are to be auctioned, and only $23 Billion are bid for. That would mean a Bid-to-Cover ratio of less than 1, also known as a fraction, like what happened in Portugal, a few days ago.
These are not normal times, in the markets, I realize that, but there is more order than you can imagine in how things are unfolding, taking away the politics.
I'm about to lose a BIG bet this weekend, but I am not bitter, because I was betting that the cram down was coming tomorrow, in front of the recess.
Damn snow.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 11, 2010 at 10:02 PM
I still think it's closer to 50/50 Sue. Which is bad enough of course.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 11, 2010 at 10:09 PM
clarice-
The country with the largest bank lending exposure to Eastern Europe is Austria. The EU is the entity that has agreed, pro forma, to assist Greece. There is no framework, other than "commitments to support Greece". There have been some grumblings that Germany will guarantee some of Greece's debt, but nothing concrete, except from the EU. Trichet, and the ECB for that matter, are silent, because they have no tools in this matter as they are currently constructed.
And they ARE on a gold standard, mind you, so learn from that what you will.
This is far from over mechanically, but politically, Greece is first, Portugal second, Ireland, and then there is the little issue of France having to roll over some debt in March, a LOT of it.
This is far from over.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 11, 2010 at 10:14 PM
Oh. My. Gawd. Ann!!!
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 10:19 PM
Did yu forget, Spain,Mel?
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 10:20 PM
Hokay - I need to read Mel in the morning with lots of coffee, rather than after two cocktails.
You keep posting Mel, and I will keep drinking (caffeine or alchohol) - either would be appropriate, no?
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 10:23 PM
because of the pressure put on the previous administration by then candidate Obama.
Sure, it's kinda like how if a health care bill passes and it works, Palin will deserve all the credit. Right?
Posted by: bgates | February 11, 2010 at 10:23 PM
Without extra consonants, natch.
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 10:24 PM
No, I didn't forget Spain, because that's the one they really want to carpet over.
I brought up Ireland specifically, because the UK guaranteed their bank debt already, sealing their fate.
Are all EU countries going to be subjected to German finance rules, or can the EU step through to political union under the financial gun.
Personally, I'll bet my little envelope of 40 year old Lire will be good again. Maybe for only a dime, but good.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 11, 2010 at 10:25 PM
Well, well, well - news flash - the Joker is leaving the state.
See ya, Patches!!!!!
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 10:26 PM
All right, I have to see if I am missing an avatar.
(Incidentally, I see the missing ones as the person's blog name.)
Posted by: Jim Miller | February 11, 2010 at 10:29 PM
via Michelle Malkin
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 10:30 PM
And, with that bit of wonderfully good news, I am gonna go to bed and watch HGTV.
Oh Happy Day!
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 10:32 PM
Cryptic post, but thanks.,cc. Patches will not run for re-election.
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 10:33 PM
Jim-
I saved a little link ( and I hope I got this rght ) for you, only.
I believe you like this guy, as opposed to my partial, Major Holly.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 11, 2010 at 10:35 PM
cc:
If you think you're winning the HGTV dream house, you are in for a heartbreak when you tune in to see me roll up with the moving truck. Just saying.
Posted by: Soylent Red | February 11, 2010 at 10:37 PM
Last time I blew a gasket on that it was 54% but that was probably year old data.
Depending on whether Stossel was talking about "people" as opposed to "workers", could the difference in the employment rate account for the jump?
Posted by: bgates | February 11, 2010 at 10:38 PM
I have a crash review of all my research tomorrow, so I'm signing off now.
G'night all.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 11, 2010 at 10:39 PM
Does this mean that "Camelot" has left the building?
Oh, C - didn't mean to be cryptic (my typos are the result of cocktails, not kittens), plus the news flash on the TV takes time to check out on the internet.
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 10:39 PM
For what it is worth, I am running Firefox.
Posted by: Jim Miller | February 11, 2010 at 10:40 PM
And, yes, I know the gift of "Avatar"!
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 11, 2010 at 10:40 PM
Soylent, dahling - I thought you were off to battle elephants or something? But, hey, I would really love the HGTV dream house, but you are so much more deserving - plus I know you would be looking for reliable vacation renters. I figure the best "applicants" would be regulars at JOM. Good grief, you know all about us, where to find us, etc., etc.
Have I kissed up enough yet?
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 10:43 PM
Jim-
Add a character to your e-mail address, every post. It's fun! (and got rid of the "green" that I couldn't see to begin with...)
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 11, 2010 at 10:43 PM
Really, I am going to bed, but dang it Mel - you were so much cuter when you were BLUE!
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 10:45 PM
Let me see how much Treasury stuff I get now:
So a primary dealer ~ market maker, direct bidder ~ somebody domestic in a position to deal directly with treasury (like Helicopter Ben), and indirect bidder ~ China. Is that right? Much (any?) activity by direct bidder is a good sign of QE; a big jump in direct bidder activity when QE is supposed to be winding down is a good sign of WTF. Yes?
Posted by: bgates | February 11, 2010 at 10:46 PM
Does the trick work?
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 10:51 PM
Yes, it does.
Posted by: clarice | February 11, 2010 at 10:52 PM
really, really going to bed to watch HGTV, but Greta just announced that Paul Van Der Sloot (of Natalie Holloway infamy and father of the main suspect) died while playing tennis.
Posted by: centralcal | February 11, 2010 at 10:53 PM
Patches will not run for re-election.
Does that mean that he's finally sober enough to understand polls?
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 11, 2010 at 11:08 PM
He's leaving to spend more time with his Ambien™.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | February 11, 2010 at 11:12 PM
Really nice time lapse video to the song:
"White Winter Hymnal" by Fleet Foxes
Posted by: glasater | February 11, 2010 at 11:14 PM
You don't have to change your e-mail address to fix the avatar; just change the case of one of the characters.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | February 11, 2010 at 11:14 PM
Bgates,
That's about it. The Fed has become a bit more adept at direct monetization since being nabbed in August.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | February 11, 2010 at 11:18 PM
So what is being done to solve this whole EU
meltdown, I'm sure the President has his 'top
men' working on it
Posted by: narciso | February 11, 2010 at 11:25 PM
cc:
I hope that was a funny "Oh.My.Gawd,Ann",
because I was just kidding, really. :) Had to post and run because "Project Runway" was coming on the T.V. One of the only shows I watch every week...natch!
Good news about Patches.
Matt:
I love your blog. Take Clarice's advice, you need more exposure. SEND TO A.T.
Clarice:
My fingers are crossed you get on that plane tomorrow. Hug wolverine for us. (I must of missed why you call her that but I do love it.)
And Glasater:
If anyone missed your gallery I am posting it again: Marvelous
We have to figure out how to get you more exposure.
Posted by: Ann | February 11, 2010 at 11:25 PM
For you guys that follow twitter, don't miss knifework he is funny:
Any day a Kennedy makes headlines without killing or molesting someone is a good day.
LOL
Posted by: Ann | February 11, 2010 at 11:43 PM
Clarice:
When you get on that plane tomorrow think about the snow tunnel you told us about.
You almost had one in D.C.
h/t mkhammer tweet
Posted by: Ann | February 11, 2010 at 11:49 PM
Obama inherited the EU mess. It's Bush's fault.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 11, 2010 at 11:55 PM
Video of Patches quitting. I wonder if he thinks he can beat Brown in '12?
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | February 12, 2010 at 12:24 AM
What Europe needs is comprehensive health care reform and cap-and-trade.
Posted by: RichatUF | February 12, 2010 at 12:37 AM
What Europe needs is more immigration, especially from Muslim countries.
Posted by: Fritz | February 12, 2010 at 12:42 AM
For many years I have read, and believed, that Edward Markey of Massachusetts is the dumbest person in the United States congress. For a long time I have harbored doubts about this assertion, believing that the honor must surely belong to the dolt Kennedy from RI.
Now, I suppose, the issue is moot. With the departure of the final imbecile from that stunted family, the laurels are clearly excusively those of the simpleton Markey.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 12, 2010 at 01:02 AM
Ann--bless your heart and many thanks. It should be better and perhaps one day it will evolve:)
Posted by: glasater | February 12, 2010 at 01:13 AM
It would be funny if Teddy had tied up his money trying to avoid inheritance tax and then died in the one year the federal is 0%.
How long will it take the Kennedy children to go through it?
Posted by: Ralph L | February 12, 2010 at 01:24 AM
Kudlow's worried Britain is next
Posted by: glasater | February 12, 2010 at 01:31 AM
Looking at Ann's picture above about a snowbound Washington DC makes me think this is a good time to bring up the old topic of how the Fed's (EPA) are trying to ban the burning of firewood for heat in wintertime Fairbanks Alaska.
For 4 days now DC has been shut down. News reports I've heard say 25-30 % of the snow removal trucks are broken, store shelves are emptying, and who knows what the heck folks are using for heat. Well welcome to a smidgeon of the snow fall and nothing like the -30 degree Temps that Fairbanks folks have to deal with for months on end.
Yet "The federal government has put Fairbanks on notice that PM 2.5 levels must be reduced by 2014. The primary cause for the pollution is wood smoke, studies show."
"Rep. Tammie Wilson, R-North Pole,...believes a pollution control effort would be futile.
Wilson told the commission the borough should adopt a strategy of convincing the Environmental Protection Agency that its regulations don’t work in Fairbanks.
“Nobody wants to breathe dirty air,” Wilson said. “Why do people burn wood? They burn it because it’s available. Until we have another option, we can only do what we can afford to.”
I've linked about this stuff before, but it's a bit satisfying when the shoe is on the other foot, and the guys who have been dictating how folks run their lives from 4,000 miles away get a wake up call from Mother Nature and can't get out of the driveway.
So fix your stinking trucks DC. We pay for them. And once you do, don't use them since they cause pollution---instead use shovels. And if the power goes out arrest anybody who uses a wood stove period. Live exactly by the rules you're mandating for everybody else. C'mon DC, get with the ECO-act. Save Gaia, blah, blah, blah.
Anyhow, if anybody cares, here is a recent story from some reporter about the ">http://newsminer.com/view/full_story/5581184/article-Trio-of-communities-might-offer-insight-into-Fairbanks’-air-pollution-problem?"> Fairbanks Air Pollution problem, which tries to compare apples to oranges. The 10 or so comments at the bottom from regular joe citizens are educational and refreshing, and my guess is not a single one of them went to Harvard.
Posted by: daddy | February 12, 2010 at 04:32 AM
glasater - that time lapse video was very cool. Really well done.
and Ann, thanks for posting the link to glasater's photos again.
Such talent out in our world.
Posted by: Janet | February 12, 2010 at 06:33 AM
LUN the WaPo is "worried" that Republicans are losing their momentum. HaHaHa!
this from the comments...
"How silly. ALL of the momentum is with the Republicans, and it's a tidal wave.
The only thing that might throw them off stride would be if Obama and Biden threatened to campaign for THEM instead of the Democrat candidates in November."
Posted by: Janet | February 12, 2010 at 07:26 AM
Janet-
Now, THAT is funny.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | February 12, 2010 at 08:03 AM
These people are certifiable, daddy, you can't use a wood stove, or coal, oil, at that point you're back to the middle ages. They need to kept on a very short leash, I think Alaska's relatively sparce population, has kept the idiocy from spreading, no explaining
a Begich though.
Posted by: narciso | February 12, 2010 at 08:45 AM
Ralph, the Kennedy money is in a tax free trust in Tahiti. I'm not kidding. They've been fighting for you with your money.
Posted by: clarice | February 12, 2010 at 08:51 AM
Ann, friends of her parents named her that because of his spirit.
Posted by: clarice | February 12, 2010 at 08:53 AM
Clarice - are you going to be able to "get out of Dodge?"
Posted by: centralcal | February 12, 2010 at 09:13 AM
Snowpocalypse in time-lapse. Shot in DC.
Clarice, is that your teddy sitting there?
Posted by: Jack is Back! | February 12, 2010 at 09:15 AM
"to see the elephant"
That is very cool, thank you Clarice and Cecil.
I hope you are getting out Clarice.
I just learned that I've been selected to be a delegate to the MA republican convention this year. That should be fun.
Posted by: Jane | February 12, 2010 at 09:17 AM
Congratulations, Jane!
Posted by: centralcal | February 12, 2010 at 09:29 AM
Jane,
Who is the other delegate?:)
Posted by: Jack is Back! | February 12, 2010 at 09:35 AM
Funniest comment of the day, on the LUN, a story about DeMint's challenger dropping out:
Purposefully and actively trying to undermine the POTUS' foreign policies is treason any way you slice it.
This is from a Democrat, criticizing DeMint.
Do these people have no memories? Do they really believe the crap they spew?
Posted by: Rob Crawford | February 12, 2010 at 09:41 AM
Jane, that's great!
Ann is a great supporter of the arts! Thank you.
The Great Santelli is at it again on that Kudlow clip.
Posted by: caro | February 12, 2010 at 09:48 AM
Mel (when you catch up)...
I very much enjoyed your decoder ring of the bond auction. Could you please elaborate a little on this (it confuses me, I admit):
"They RECEIVE the resulting yield awarded by the auction process, not the "High Yield" awarded to competitive bidders, in this case 4.625%, not the 4.720% awarded and a 10 basis point haircut over the life of the bond.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 12, 2010 at 09:55 AM
Ras -15 today.
Posted by: Extraneus | February 12, 2010 at 10:00 AM