Obama is not exactly burning his ships after he lands at today's healthcare summit. From the WSJ:
Obama Readies a Fallback Health-Care Proposal
Scaled-Down Plan Would Expand Insurance to About Half as Many People as Pending Bill Envisions
By Laura Meckler
President Barack Obama will use a bipartisan summit Thursday to push for sweeping health-care legislation, but if that fails to generate enough support the White House has prepared the outlines of a more modest plan.
His leading alternate approach would provide health insurance to perhaps 15 million Americans, about half what the comprehensive bill would cover, according to two people familiar with the planning.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer made similar comments about the plausibility of a smaller plan on Tuesday. None of this will stiffen the spine of wavering Democrats looking for a graceful retreat from the current unpopular bill.
PUSHING BACK: The White House is furious,as is Team Reality. Shorter Ezra Klein - there is no fallback plan, even though there is. Oh, let him tell it:
Plan B has been around for awhile. In August, discussions raged in the White House over whether to pare back the bill. The comprehensive folks won the argument, but people also drew up plans for how you could pare back the bill, if it came to that. More thinking was done on this in the aftermath of the Massachusetts election, when Rahm Emanuel and some of the political folks again argued for retreating to a more modest bill. As you'd expect, these conversations included proposals for how that smaller bill would look.
At this point, I could quote some White House sources swearing up and down that that's all this is. A vestigial document that's being blown out of proportion by a conservative paper interested in an agenda-setting story. They're furious over this story. None of the quotes are sourced to the White House -- not even anonymously -- raising questions that the whole thing is sabotage. But it hardly matters. There's no Plan B at this point in the game, and most everyone knows it.
He could quote White Sources but he won't? Odd reserve for a journalist, but this may spare his sources some embarrassment when Plan B that was drawn up months ago and revised weeks ago yet doesn't exist is put forward.
PILING ON: CNN's new poll (also Murdoch-inspired sabotage, no doubt), shows 25% of the public favors the bills on offer, 48% don't want those bills but would like to see Congress keep working towards a more sensible reform (but we daren't cal it a Plan B), and 25% want to watch curling.
The time for debate is over,
the time for rhetoric is upon us.
We must move forward, not backward, upward not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards health care reform.
Posted by: BumperStickerist | February 25, 2010 at 07:04 AM
If I wrote the news:
"His leading alternate approach would threaten law-abiding American citizens with jail time unless they collectively surrendered enough money to provide health insurance to 15 million other people. (It will be impossible to tell how much health insurance will actually be provided by this scheme until after the government has acquired the money from taxpayers.)"
Posted by: bgates | February 25, 2010 at 07:19 AM
If the Repubs had brains they'd insist that tort reform be included in any "reform" and let the Commiecrats sail off the edge of the earth in a burning ship to avoid it. That might require some "accidents" to sadly occur to a couple crones from Maine and a certain squishy RINO from Ohio.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 25, 2010 at 08:10 AM
It is past time for US citizens to demand to be heard and make this wonks listen!
A maga march on DC amd NYC media centers is the only way, short of pitchforks, to get them to listen.
Posted by: 2DRIGHT | February 25, 2010 at 08:13 AM
"We know that your party receives a lot of money from the trial lawyers' association. Is that the reason you refuse to include tort reform, which estimates say could save upwards of $50B per year?"
[is there a Greg Craig to delegate that one to?]
"You've said that a 'public option' would increase competition in the health insurance industry, yet you've refused to allow consumers to purchase insurance across state lines. Could you explain that to the American people?"
[Greg?]
If the Republicans are prepared, they should come out fine in comparison to the cast of ghouls the Dems have invited.
Posted by: Extraneus | February 25, 2010 at 08:17 AM
The four major problems with the current plan:
1) the general sense that it is meant to undermine the insurance system rather than bolster it.
2) No tort reform
3) use of the Medicare money (that really doesn't exist) to pay for it
4) the iron clad use of the Medical Advisory board to reduce cost by denying procedures (although this is intentionally left vague)
vs
the outlying years will bankrupt the country.
This paradox in 4), pointed to by Palin, has been brushed over intentionally. It's sort of equivalent to giving your power of attoney to a relative who wishes you dead.
Posted by: Neo | February 25, 2010 at 08:37 AM
Extraneous,
It doesn't matter much. Unless President Pinhead starts drooling too much we're going to see "cool, cerebral, intellectual" in the MSM pap aftermath. There's a fair chance that he'll say something of Bidenesque stupidity that will be enshrined by You-Tube for future delectation but it will never appear on the networks.
I'm looking forward to "there will be growth in the spring" pablum and standard prog pixie dust, much like that which Bullshitbunker continues sprinkle in comments. It's been said that no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people but I believe the Democrats are in the process of proving that erroneous.
The Republicans need only stress the negative economic impact, unknown costs and probability of increasing job losses due to uncertainty in order to "win" this particular farce, wrapped in a travesty, inside an charade. The people have already spoken, President Pinhead is just doubling down on sure defeat.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | February 25, 2010 at 08:40 AM
In a short phrase, it's too vague even with the thousands of pages in the legislation.
Posted by: Neo | February 25, 2010 at 08:46 AM
Let me be clear.... my health care plan totally sux0rs!
obama + "let me be clear" + google => 3,260,000 hits.
Posted by: The Once | February 25, 2010 at 08:47 AM
There's a fair chance that he'll say something of Bidenesque stupidity that will be enshrined by You-Tube for future delectation but it will never appear on the networks.
...and that sums up my great frustration. For many Americans, if they are uninformed, it is because the MSM has lied, hidden, and spun so much information.
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 08:48 AM
President Obama should take some advice from Misters Johnny Mercer and Harold Arlen and not mess with Mister In-Between
Accent-u-ate the Positive
~/ You've got to accentuate the positive
Eliminate the negative
Latch on to the affirmative
Don't mess with Mister In-Between/~
as sung by Aretha Franklin
-
Posted by: BumperStickerist | February 25, 2010 at 08:58 AM
Americans need not be uninformed, the info is out There.
"Barrasso adds that he remains “fascinated” at how not one “logical thought” has been expressed by Democrats in their summit-prep efforts, and still feels that Obama is unwilling to work with the GOP."
Posted by: pagar | February 25, 2010 at 09:02 AM
"Some months ago, you explained to us that our ideas wouldn't be considered because... I believe your exact words were 'I won.' What has caused you to change your mind since then?"
This is an opportunity, and shouldn't be wasted with a snooze-fest, Repubs. The glass jaw will be jutting out there majestically, for sure.
Posted by: Extraneus | February 25, 2010 at 09:03 AM
Well, that was depressing.
I just saw a little interview on a sports radio show (yes, "saw", they run it on tv) with a young guy named Myron Rolle. He plays safety at Florida State, and he just finished a pre-med degree in 2 1/2 years and is headed off to Oxford to be a Rhodes Scholar before he tries out for the NFL before continuing on to med school in hopes of becoming a neurosurgeon.
And what inspired this bright fellow as a youth? "Reading about great leaders like Nelson Mandela and Kofi Annan." What kind of questions were part of the Rhodes interview? "What three books are on my nightstand; what would I tell Barack Obama - since the interview was right when he came into office - how can he help our country considering he's walking into a situation where he has to deal with a climate crisis, two wars overseas, a failing economy, and a failing health care system...."
He's looking forward to his time at Oxford, where, he says, he will really be challenged in his beliefs.
Posted by: bgates | February 25, 2010 at 09:07 AM
One sure bet:
Obama will outperform expectations.
Thanks guys!
Bush had to expend his own political capital on lowering expectations, but thanks to Obama Paranoia Syndrome the wingnutosphere keeps the bar flat on the ground for Obama to glide right over without breaking stride...
Posted by: bunkerbuster | February 25, 2010 at 09:16 AM
Why should his beliefs be challenged? Blacks are not allowed to embrace any ideologies except leftist ones....otherwise they are = to mass murderers.
LUN a shameful WaPo sponsored wedsite that has the article "Black Folks We'd Like to Remove From Black History". John Allen Muhammad (beltway sniper) is = to Clarence Thomas. Just sickening.
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 09:22 AM
Mandela, I could see, yes he was a terrorist,
but there were as they say 'pre-existing conditions' but Kofi Annan, the blame shifting
international bureaucrat from Rwanda to Iraq
to the Iranian nuclear crisis.
Posted by: narciso | February 25, 2010 at 09:23 AM
One sure bet:
Obama will outperform expectations.
The expectations were:
-a net cut in federal spending
-no taxes raised on anybody making less than $250k
-no mandated insurance purchase
-eliminating half a trillion dollars in Medicare waste and fraud
-televising all health care negotiations on C-SPAN
-keeping lobbyists out of the administration
-bringing a new era of unity and bipartisanship to Washington
-closing Gitmo on day one
-withdrawing from Iraq in year one
-persuading Europe to send troops to Afghanistan
-finishing health care as a political issue for all time
-and those were all expectations set by Himself. "Your mom voted for Obama" will be the playground taunt of the future, and the future starts in about 3 years.
Posted by: bgates | February 25, 2010 at 09:31 AM
bunjerbuster:
"One sure bet: Obama will outperform expectations."
Posted by: JM Hanes | February 25, 2010 at 09:33 AM
Check out the slope of the green line since around September. Heading for 20 by June or so at this rate.
Posted by: Extraneus | February 25, 2010 at 09:43 AM
I hereby nominate everyone else to live-blog the health show. I know I'm not going to watch any of it.
Posted by: PaulL | February 25, 2010 at 09:46 AM
Me too, Paul. I'd rather watch re-runs of ice dancing. (just trying to cause trouble)
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 25, 2010 at 09:50 AM
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjA5MjNhNzJjNDJlNjBlYjQ0NDFhNDVmMGExNTRmMTI=>Obama to Britain, Drop Dead
I really, really can't stand this president.
Posted by: Sue | February 25, 2010 at 09:55 AM
New Jobless Claims Jumped to 496,000 as Heavy Snow Caused Rise in Layoffs
Another AP parody:
Posted by: Extraneus | February 25, 2010 at 09:56 AM
Tort reform is essential, but it's a mere bagatelle. No way the GOP should accept federalization of the system in return for that.
I see Obama invited Olympia Snowe and she declined.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 25, 2010 at 10:01 AM
Six hours of this, isn't that a violation of the Geneva Convention, send the tape to KSM
and he'll confess all over again
Posted by: narciso | February 25, 2010 at 10:03 AM
My biggest fear is the GOP will cave.
Posted by: Sue | February 25, 2010 at 10:06 AM
Jane:
Don't know if you saw this article, via Instapundit, which is made for You Too material: More than 70 percent of congressional offices violate OSHA safety standards
Posted by: JM Hanes | February 25, 2010 at 10:08 AM
Yeah I just blogged it JMH
Posted by: Jane | February 25, 2010 at 10:13 AM
Clarice sent it to me last night. I had seen it and never put 2 + 2 together for You Too so I really appreciate all the suggestions.
Thank you.
Posted by: Jane | February 25, 2010 at 10:14 AM
Sorry to have 3 posts in a row, but there is no way I am going to be able to listen to this man drone on for 6 hours.
So far he's said the deficit is the result of not having health care, and we all know how urgent it is. They should get up and walk out.
Posted by: Jane | February 25, 2010 at 10:16 AM
I sent it to her yesterday,JMH.
Love the fallback position and its leak today before the summit of summits.
what's the fallback fallback? free bandaids and aspirings?
Posted by: Clarice | February 25, 2010 at 10:16 AM
I'd rather watch re-runs of ice dancing. (just trying to cause trouble)
I've done a good job of not watching the UN of sports and deathcare-to-be-put-on-ice won't reach my retinas either.
Speaking of spectacles of de gubbiment: I didn't know that the Donkeycrats had dropped so low as to include nutjob and UAW tool Kucinich in the grilling of Toyoda. Anybody that thinks Bammy's policies will produce economic growth and jobs should look at Dennis's economic wasteland of a district.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 25, 2010 at 10:19 AM
What's interesting about the Olympics is that NBC expects to lose $250M on them. And that's with parent GE buying a bunch of the commercial slots. MSM shows its business acumen once again. Must be that Profit Earning Ratio stuff again.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 25, 2010 at 10:24 AM
I've got it on and it looks like he is using a teleprompter for his prepared remarks. Wonder if he is hoping that this will be the GOP surrender talks.
I'm wondering what the hell he is talking about the deficit being caused by healthcare. A 2.5 Trillion dollar program wouldn't fix the deficit. His cash-for-caulkers and cash-for-clunkers would probably be better places to look. Ask about the ecocomic crisis in Europe-they've all got socialized healthcare and they're all swirling down the drain.
Posted by: RichatUF | February 25, 2010 at 10:25 AM
In the schadenfreude department, about that imminent twit, Alan Grayson, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | February 25, 2010 at 10:25 AM
Claudia Rossett, asks the question, everyone seems to have missed on Mabdouh
Posted by: narciso | February 25, 2010 at 10:30 AM
Sue, don't worry. Although I've always considered the GOP the stupid party, I think on this one they've figured out that they have the facts and the public on their side.
And I'm beginning to think of the Dems as the utterly delusional party.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 25, 2010 at 10:30 AM
I live near Kucinich's wasteland of a district and the only thing K has accomplished is getting a train to run less often and doing a flip-flop on abortion. Hopefully he is still a no vote on Healthcare because of the cost.
Posted by: maryrose | February 25, 2010 at 10:30 AM
And for anyone interested, Cato is live blogging the GOP surrender talks.
Can't watch any more. The camera cut to Obama and he had his nose stuck in the air and a smirk on his face.
Posted by: RichatUF | February 25, 2010 at 10:32 AM
I'm wondering what the hell he is talking about the deficit being caused by healthcare.
I wish the Repubs would knock this hanging curveball out of the park because, if nothing else, BOzo is capable of retaining only a very small number of talking points which are repeated at every opportunity. Ditto the health problems of Topsy and Jemima when children are supposed to be offbase in political matters.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 25, 2010 at 10:34 AM
My biggest fear is the GOP will cave.
Sue, I don't blame you, but I think it's different this time. They know they have the cards, and are playing from an overall position of strength - even though this particular event is risky for them due to the usual suspects manipulating the PR. So they may play it safe today, but I don't think they'll cave. It'll be more like "that's nice Mr. President, thanks but no thanks." And the majority of the country will agree.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 25, 2010 at 10:37 AM
I'm watching with the sound off. There's a dude on there cleaning out his ears on camera.
BWAHAHAHA.
Posted by: SunnyDay | February 25, 2010 at 10:37 AM
The camera cut to Obama
There's some Obamabot director deciding whose mug gets shown and when? Good grief.
Posted by: DebinNC | February 25, 2010 at 10:39 AM
Strong beginning by Sen. Lamar Alexander. Obama already irritated and frustrated!
Posted by: centralcal | February 25, 2010 at 10:39 AM
Deb: so far the camera shots to The Won are helpful - it has only just begun and he is already coming off rather irritated.
Posted by: centralcal | February 25, 2010 at 10:41 AM
what's the fallback fallback?
A first aid kit and a copy of an old Peace Corp book, "Where There Is No Doctor".
The 2010 version of a chicken in every pot!
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 10:41 AM
This story, Poland's future looks bright, sheds some light on articles I've been seeing lately about large new gas reserves becoming accessible thanks to new technology developed in the US. This story has very broad implications, especially for US policy in Central Asia and the Mideast:
Posted by: anduril | February 25, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Laura Ingraham just commented that Bammers looks bored as hell as Pelosi Galore drones on. Other than his ADD I can kind of sympathize with him.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 25, 2010 at 10:44 AM
it has only just begun and he is already coming off rather irritated.
Of course he's irritated. The peons aren't falling into line the way they should, and he can't just have them shot.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | February 25, 2010 at 10:45 AM
CNN sheds some of the little light available on the nitty gritty of the Dubai hit:
Looks like the killers indulged themselves a bit. I wonder if they took any video footage?
Posted by: anduril | February 25, 2010 at 10:46 AM
Harry Reid is talking about a donut hole...good Lord...the most boring man on planet earth!
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 10:47 AM
My favorite part so far:
With sadness to the point of weeping (like when she talked about those "nazi teabaggers", Nancy Pelosi talks about a guy who was too embarrassed to tell his family he had no money for health care. Leave it to Nancy to announce it to the country.
Posted by: Jane | February 25, 2010 at 10:48 AM
The stock market is NOT doing well.......
Posted by: glasater | February 25, 2010 at 10:48 AM
Best thing about having a killfile -- not having to scroll through pages-long screeds.
Seriously, "anduril", get your own blog.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | February 25, 2010 at 10:48 AM
Steny Hoyer is trying to kill Harry Reid with his eyes.
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 10:49 AM
Couldn't watch/listen any longer after Nancy and Harry....will appreciate others comments that do.
Posted by: glasater | February 25, 2010 at 10:51 AM
What Rob said.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 25, 2010 at 10:52 AM
What OL said.
Posted by: DrJ | February 25, 2010 at 10:53 AM
It's amazing, OL, watching the page shrink to half its original size as the killfile kicks in.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | February 25, 2010 at 10:53 AM
Phil Giraldi has an informative article re the whole business of faking passports for special ops by intelligence agencies: What’s In a Name?
He discusses some of the issues involved, especially the increasing complexity due to new technologies for checking documents as well as tracing physical identities and movements of those identities internationally. In doing so, he draws some parallels between the Dubai hit and the CIA kidnapping in Italy.
Posted by: anduril | February 25, 2010 at 10:56 AM
"watching the page shrink to half its original size"
And with no loss of relevant content.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 25, 2010 at 10:56 AM
I'll watch not a second of it but will check in here frequently to see the comments of those who do. I value what the JOMers in the aggregate say more than any other person or group.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 25, 2010 at 10:56 AM
Rossett's question is something to consider, they knew who Mabdouh he was, they probably
asw his little press conference on Al Jazeera, why didn't they detain him, either
at Doha airport, or at the Al Bustana hotel; probably would have saved his life
Posted by: narciso | February 25, 2010 at 10:57 AM
Oh dear Obama is contradicting Lamar Alexander - no rise in cost but if they upgrade the policy from those awful policies they have then a rise in cost. So no rise in cost.
Obama is floundering. He's also lying - says buying insurance against state lines is in the senate proposal.
Posted by: Jane | February 25, 2010 at 11:00 AM
Obama has diarrhea of the mouth. He isn't even letting the Republicans respond. Just another Obama speech.
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 11:01 AM
So we shouldn't have killed Hamza Rabia, or Abu Faraj Al Libi, or Mustafa Atef, because they were likely to be replaced.
Posted by: narciso | February 25, 2010 at 11:02 AM
Alexander says How bout letting some others talk....
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 11:03 AM
For those of you who can endure it, is Earflaps Obaritone talking with a negro dialect today?
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 25, 2010 at 11:04 AM
Rossett's piece is right. In fact, Tzipi Livni said much the same thing yesterday.
Posted by: Clarice | February 25, 2010 at 11:05 AM
The WSJ has a lengthy article on the Dubai hit. The reason my link doesn't use the article's actual title is because the title fails to hint at the most interesting new details which are disclosed: there is another American angle, beyond just the credit cards:
Posted by: anduril | February 25, 2010 at 11:06 AM
Tom Coburn speaking...really good...really, really good...talking about government waste, too much regulation, and tort reform.
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Coburn is great.
Posted by: Jane | February 25, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Count me in with the folks who can't/won't watch. You guys are gold, thanks so much for doing what I can't bear to do and reporting back.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 25, 2010 at 11:09 AM
The Cato live blog running above the feed is pretty interesting.
That way I can mute the computer when Reid comes on--just cannot listen to that man.
Posted by: glasater | February 25, 2010 at 11:09 AM
anduril,
I'm begging you, please leave this thread to the HCR summit liveblogging and use another thread for your posts. I think you'll get more eyeballs this way and it'll be easier for readers to keep up with the more urgent HCR commentary.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 25, 2010 at 11:10 AM
Fraud rate in Medicare is huge. Why create more government programs.
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 11:11 AM
The whole thing has a very Col Renault feeling, both round up the usual suspects'
and "I'm shocked gambling is going on here'
as well 'my winnings, please" The Emirates gave us BCCI, they were headquarters for AQ
Khan's nuke stop n shop, as well some of the efforts in Iran's nuclear project
Posted by: narciso | February 25, 2010 at 11:11 AM
Yes, Jane, Coburn is hitting the legit points.
Now being accused of filibustering. :P
Posted by: SunnyDay | February 25, 2010 at 11:11 AM
New Jobless Claims Far Worse Than Expected
from Clusterstock by Vincent Fernando
The Department of Labor's (DOL) measure of initial jobless claims for the week ending February 20th was reported today as a seasonally-adjusted 496,000 vs. an expected 460,000 from consensus.
Posted by: anduril | February 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM
/ sound
Posted by: SunnyDay | February 25, 2010 at 11:15 AM
For those of you who can endure it, is Earflaps Obaritone talking with a negro dialect today?
Not yet Captain, but the day is young.
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 11:16 AM
From the Cato live blog:
Arnold Kling: So far, the Democratic strategy seems to be to talk about everything except what is in the bill. They are running away from the bill, but saying that we have to pass it yesterday.
Santelli on CNBC says the hearing involving the Fed chairman is having an effect on the markets--along the the Med summit.
Posted by: glasater | February 25, 2010 at 11:17 AM
it'll be easier for readers to keep up with the more urgent HCR commentary
Oh, like:
is Earflaps Obaritone talking with a negro dialect today?
So blatantly racist comments qualify as "urgent HCR commentary" among you so-called conservatives? No one even raises a verbal eyebrow?
Posted by: anduril | February 25, 2010 at 11:17 AM
The live chat at CATO says Coburn was "through" bring back Lamar. I took it to mean Coburn wasn't very effective. Glad to hear otherwise.
Posted by: Sue | February 25, 2010 at 11:18 AM
Has anybody asked Barry during his sob story of Stanley Ann dying what he was doing to help her out with her "problems" with the insurance companies (which are surely more of his BS strawmen)?
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 25, 2010 at 11:18 AM
Hoyer talking about wellness programs (Coburn brought it up). I fear wellness programs. The busybodies will never be satisfied.
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 11:19 AM
blatantly racist comments
LOL. Good luck on getting anybody to take you seriously.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 25, 2010 at 11:20 AM
Capt'n,
I wouldn't believe his answer.
Posted by: Sue | February 25, 2010 at 11:20 AM
I love the: "If you have a better idea we'd love to hear it" stuff. Uh where have you guys been for the last year. Oh wait, I know that answer.
Posted by: Jane | February 25, 2010 at 11:21 AM
Bambi assumes that Coburn has not read the bill, and pretends all his ideas are in the bill. It is so disingenuous.
Posted by: Jane | February 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM
I was trying to be nice, anduril, but whatever.
Posted by: Porchlight | February 25, 2010 at 11:23 AM
And this just seems gratuitous, to insult your banker this way
Posted by: narciso | February 25, 2010 at 11:23 AM
I hope Lamar Alexander's challenge of BO's "facts" is correct. If so, I hope he emboldened others there to follow his example, unlike John McCain who seemed bemused by it all. Thanks to all able to watch and report for the benefit of those of us who can't take it.
Posted by: DebinNC | February 25, 2010 at 11:24 AM
Giraldi's main point, btw, re blowback and consequences, is simply this:
Is that worth letting some thugs get their jollies zapping this Hamas cretin's genitals a few times before he died?
Posted by: anduril | February 25, 2010 at 11:25 AM
Btw, TM has opened a new thread specifically for HCR theater so anduril can have unfettered access to filling this up with his copy and paste bandwidth destroyers.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 25, 2010 at 11:25 AM
Don't feed the boor. He likes it.
Tom wants to move us to the new HCR Open Thread.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 25, 2010 at 11:25 AM
Obama speaking again...and speaking...and speaking...and speaking.
Kline(R) talking about small companies being allowed to band together for savings. Not a new idea.
Posted by: Janet | February 25, 2010 at 11:26 AM
Moving over to the new thread - thanks for the heads up!
Posted by: Porchlight | February 25, 2010 at 11:26 AM
Cato:
Arnold Kling: You can really see how Pelosi and Reid are problems for Obama. So far, they are the only ones here who did not get the memo to try to sound conciliatory and constructive
Posted by: glasater | February 25, 2010 at 11:41 AM