Krauthammer on the Obama's nuclear summit:
Obama's nuclear strutting and fretting
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, April 16, 2010; A25
There was something oddly disproportionate about the just-concluded nuclear summit to which President Obama summoned 46 world leaders, the largest such gathering on American soil since 1945. That meeting was about the founding of the United Nations, which 65 years ago seemed an event of world-historical importance.
But this one? What was this great convocation about? To prevent the spread of nuclear material into the hands of terrorists. A worthy goal, no doubt. Unfortunately, the two greatest such threats were not even on the agenda.
The first is Iran, which is frantically enriching uranium to make a bomb, and which our own State Department identifies as the greatest exporter of terrorism in the world.
Nor on the agenda was Pakistan's plutonium production, which is adding to the world's stockpile of fissile material every day.
When do we abandon Obama's 80's flashbacks and talk about jobs, jobs, jobs?
Perhaps that recent New York Times article about hallucinogens can help answer that question.
Posted by: peter | April 16, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Plame was a real good spy and important too.
Posted by: volcanic | April 16, 2010 at 12:30 PM
I believe Obama has an historical narrative that he must feed, irrespective of results, meaning or even continued political success. This fits nicely in that narrative, as did being the first to pass health care whether flawed, understood or even sustainable. To him, the details don't matter, only the narrative. First at this, first at that, largest gathering here, there and everywhere. His distain for almost everyone else, including the press, is remarkable for its open expression. Who else in polite, public society in these times smokes?
He will preside over the proliferation of nuclear weapons because he is the first to recognize the right of all people to nuclear power. He is the first to scale back the unnecessary exploration of space and the very first to improve American democracy though real freedom of speech (that which advances society while avoiding hurtful words) and through the equalization of opportunity (read wealth).
He may be the first to authorize the murder of Americans abroad. Maybe coming soon to a theatre near you.
He will be the first to do many things, unless the Republicans can learn to say, no and mean it.
I doubt they can.
Posted by: MarkO | April 16, 2010 at 12:49 PM
Press Sec Gibbs just sent out this tweet:
POTUS just finished 90 minutes in the Sit Room for monthly meeting on Afghanistan and Pakistan...
Like Whoa, a whole hour and a half this month.
Man he works hard. :)
Posted by: Ann says Obama Sucks! | April 16, 2010 at 12:51 PM
we know who the offenders are. We know the sources for materials. We know China and Russia have stood in our way for the past 25 years. Nothing changed. The meeting was pointless.
Canada, Mexico, and Ukraine giving up their weapons grade uranium is like Mahatma Gandhi giving up meat for Lent.
Posted by: matt | April 16, 2010 at 12:53 PM
I believe Obama has an historical narrative that he must feed, irrespective of results, meaning or even continued political success.
Obama is a Legend in his own mind.
Posted by: Neo | April 16, 2010 at 01:05 PM
Good comment, MarkO. Nice to see people getting it on the deeper levels. The elites aren't. The GOP for the most part isn't. But more and more people are. It is my one source of encouragement these days. So ironic that Obama of the Left, which sees itself as the sole, all-time champion of the "people," is inspiring the most authentic and powerful (and threatening!) people-driven movement in modern times.
Posted by: rrpjr | April 16, 2010 at 01:56 PM
It's infuriating to me that people like Medved aren't getting it. When he says "Obama's just another big government type" I want to scream at him "No he's not". It's pretty damn bad that we have people like that trying to shape opinions when they can't even accurately evaluate date that's right in front of them.
Posted by: Captain Hate | April 16, 2010 at 02:09 PM
date == data
Posted by: Captain Hate | April 16, 2010 at 02:10 PM
For the biggest confab of nations since the formation of the UN, this generated very little press that will translate into "legacy building."
Posted by: Neo | April 16, 2010 at 02:22 PM
Heh, at least partly because the press was excluded. And upset about it, too.
==============
Posted by: So 'splain a me the difference between Saddam and Obama. | April 16, 2010 at 02:24 PM
Petty but Funny
Fashion Icon
Posted by: Ann says Obama Sucks! | April 16, 2010 at 02:37 PM
HTC Evo
Posted by: voic | April 16, 2010 at 02:40 PM
So ironic that Obama of the Left, which sees itself as the sole, all-time champion of the "people," is inspiring the most authentic and powerful (and threatening!) people-driven movement in modern times.
Yes.
Oh, got hit with another one of those "Republican Sucker Punches" lefties like to toss out. I've been listening to a podcast on the history of Rome, and for his 100th episode, the guy did a Q&A show. Someone asked him the inevitable "compare and contrast the USA and Rome" question, and he tossed in the comparison of the Tea Parties to the Gracchi brothers.
Except that what the Gracchi did is what the Tea Parties are against. Tiberius Gracchus "redistributed" land through a board that consisted of himself, his father-in-law, and his brother. When the other tribunes (there were nine others) tried to block him, he "appealed to the people". After attempting to run for an illegal second term, he and 300 of his supporters were clubbed to death by Senate supporters.
Gaius Gracchus attempted to establish a nomenklatura out of mid-level politicians, fixed the price of grain, and attempted to ram through the Roman equivalent of immigration reform/amnesty. He DID serve a second, illegal, term as tribune, but was eventually run out of town and killed, along with 3000 of his supporters.
Now, let's see: price fixing, nomenklatura, "amnesty" for illegals, redistribution of wealth, overreach of power... that's NOT the Tea Parties! That's their OPPOSITE!
Sheesh.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 16, 2010 at 02:41 PM
I get it. Obama wears Mom Jeans.
Michelle has Dad Genes
Posted by: Ann says Obama Sucks! | April 16, 2010 at 02:43 PM
which one is the fashion icon? I would have to say the one on the right. Nice print pattern.
Posted by: matt | April 16, 2010 at 02:55 PM
I would have to say the one on the right. Nice print pattern.
He's certainly more feminine.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 16, 2010 at 03:03 PM
It just takes a certain....self-confidence to put yourself out there as an expert on weight loss and healthy eating.
Posted by: MayBee | April 16, 2010 at 03:04 PM
btw- 3(!) of the people who farm at the plots were allowed into Michelle's event there yesterday. The rest stood across the street and had their view partially blocked by security vehicles.
This on the same day that her husband flew to KSC to speak to 200 at NASA, but workers were not actually invited into the speech.
Posted by: MayBee | April 16, 2010 at 03:07 PM
That's a peculiar spin on it, Rob, the earliest JFK conspiracists made the comparison with those self same brothers,
Steven Saylor, paints the latter very much
in that light. I recall Parenti had a similar take, derangement is taking these people down some odd angles
Posted by: nathan hale | April 16, 2010 at 03:31 PM
It's not hard to figure out what Obama hoped to get by calling his great nuclear confab together. The more interesting angle is what the folks who accepted the invitation hoped to get from him.
Posted by: JM Hanes | April 16, 2010 at 03:33 PM
Hey nathan, did you know about this (from the Corner):
Rubio endorsed Huckabee in 2008
So Mr Tea Party went with the big-government theocrat charlatan. Depressing.
Posted by: bgates | April 16, 2010 at 03:36 PM
Love Krauthammer. Anyone who would prioritize controlling nuclear material over ensuring the number one state sponsor of terror doesn't achieve a nuclear weapon hasn't seen the ball since the kickoff. Oh yeah, and whoever took over from AQ Khan. (And leaning on the DPRK, while we're at it.) Is this really complicated? Because it doesn't look that way from here.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | April 16, 2010 at 03:46 PM
I love him, too, Cecil.
Here are some great pics of the DC rally yesterday.
ttp://www.lookingattheleft.com/2010/04/tax-day-revolt-washington-dc-2010/
Posted by: Clarice | April 16, 2010 at 03:58 PM
Pickings were slim on the ground, that year,
bgates, I was for Guiliani. Speaking of sucker punches, TV Guide is going with the
mobs and the hatey, they do mention Olbermann
in passing, but Phil Griffin assures us that problem, has been resolved, exhibit A & B, are
Glenn, and Sarah at Searchlight, with her cheerful visage,they messed up they also had
footage of the angry antiwar folk, from Zombie's PJM piece
Posted by: nathan hale | April 16, 2010 at 04:10 PM
Nice pictures, Clarice!
Posted by: Tom Bowler | April 16, 2010 at 04:15 PM
An Xperia getting deleted. It's like an Incredible Droid or something.
So, like some props are good, others aren't and who decides?
Posted by: Veri Htc | April 16, 2010 at 04:55 PM
Thanks for the great photos of D.C. rally, Clarice. You all deserved the good weather. Our Angry Mob never looked so good!
For contrast and compare, I then looked at the blog entry about the La Rouche bunch who put Hitler mustaches on our Pres.Ray D. Tutto. Does Bill Clinton think those nutcases need to be inspired by the Tea Party? Of course, not. BTW, he sounded physically weak in his talk. I hope someone is looking after his health.
Did daddy make it out of Paris?
Posted by: Frau Freude am Freitag | April 16, 2010 at 07:27 PM
Frau - we missed you this time.
Posted by: Jane says obamasucks | April 16, 2010 at 07:52 PM
Very much Frau...I would have loved for you to come. Next time.
How's your back Jane?
Posted by: Janet | April 16, 2010 at 08:01 PM
My back was amazingly horrible all day. I got home and took a vicoden and it is considerably better. Thanks for asking.
Caro and I were just talking about how incredibly fabulous all our JOM friends are. Absolutely the best of the best. What a great 3 days!
Posted by: Jane says obamasucks | April 16, 2010 at 08:15 PM
Bill Clinton is deeply disturbed by the deeply disturbed tea partiers...perhaps Bill is just disturbed.
Posted by: matt | April 16, 2010 at 08:15 PM
Agreed Matt, he only looks marginally better in compared to Obama, but this statement to
the Sorosian CAP, just like when he recalled
the Crusades right after 9/11, blurs the distinction, cynicism doesn't cover it
Posted by: nathan hale | April 16, 2010 at 08:22 PM
My back was amazingly horrible all day. I got home and took a vicoden and it is considerably better. Thanks for asking.
Vicodan makes everything better.
Except your liver, but you can't have everything.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | April 16, 2010 at 09:27 PM
My liver feels great.
Posted by: Jane says obamasucks | April 16, 2010 at 09:53 PM
Mine too, Jane and I just had a dry Manhattan up. Time for the Chinese.
On the topic, I think the nuclear nonproliferation BS is just like the big show on HCR. It is to misdirect attention away from the stinkiest employment picture the US has seen if not since the great depression, at least since Jimmy Carter. Is anyone going to be the Woodward and Bernstein of the Obama Administration? Is ther another Drew Pearson or Jack Anderson in the wings? Westbook Pegler? Whitaker Chambers? Doesn't every generation have someone like that? What an opportunity. If I were 40 years younger, I would really be excited to at least make the effort.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vjnjagvet | April 16, 2010 at 10:14 PM
Jim, Don't forget woodward and Bernstein really didn't do a lot of original investigation. They had the number 2 guy in the FBI feeding them everything. It was like reading a novel beginning with the ending.
Posted by: Clarice | April 16, 2010 at 10:21 PM
That is the ironic thing, isn't it Clarice, and since we know that Bradlee certainly knew
that Felt was the source, didn't the fact that
he was from Hoover's shop raise a red flag. In retrospect, watching ATPM now, Woodward and Bernstein, really do seem even stupider
then we ever thought they were. Felt, however,
as we remarked re the PJM piece, was ultimately more clueless, as he nearly went
to jail for his betrayals
Posted by: nathan hale | April 16, 2010 at 10:31 PM
What's amazing is that like the meme that Libby outed Plame the misapprehension about Woodward and Bernstein lingers on.
Posted by: Clarice | April 16, 2010 at 10:38 PM
Ha. Clarice's link had a guy with a sign:
They're Killing Independent George
Ha.
Posted by: Jim Ryan | April 16, 2010 at 10:39 PM
OT, but I think this deserves more attention than it got this week:
Supreme Court calls for more security money, citing increased threats
I doubt the threats are coming from the Tea Party Patriots that believe in the Constituion and our Founding Fathers.
Anyways, the rest of the article is a hoot. There is a tense exchange with Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), who pressed Justice Thomas on the lack of diversity among the Supreme Court’s prestigious clerkships and a prediction from Justice Breyer that the healthcare bill will increase the number of cases heard in the Supreme Court.
Read the whole thing!
Posted by: Ann says Obama Sucks! | April 16, 2010 at 10:40 PM
Gateway Pundit brings good tidings:Republic congressional candidate Djou is 15 pts ahead of his opponent in Hawaii!!!!!!
Posted by: Clarice | April 16, 2010 at 10:42 PM
Holy cow, Michelle Bachmann is 54? She looks like 40.
Posted by: Jim Ryan | April 16, 2010 at 10:45 PM
She is good looking , isn't she?
Posted by: Clarice | April 16, 2010 at 10:49 PM
Don't forget woodward and Bernstein really didn't do a lot of original investigation. They had the number 2 guy in the FBI feeding them everything. It was like reading a novel beginning with the ending.
True. And wouldn't it be wonderful if there were someone like Held feeding information about teh Once administration to someone who would bring it to the country's attention?
She is good looking , isn't she?
Yep, and wouldn't she make a great Speaker of the House?
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vjnjagvet | April 16, 2010 at 10:58 PM
Yes she would, Jim.
Niters all.
Posted by: Clarice | April 16, 2010 at 10:59 PM
They're Killing Independent George
That was a good one, I also liked the one with a picture of the Tail Gunner and the Zer0 captioned:
"Joe McCarthy- Vindicated"
Posted by: Strawman Cometh | April 16, 2010 at 11:00 PM
Yep, and wouldn't she make a great Speaker of the House?
Um, excuse me?
Posted by: Paul Ryan | April 16, 2010 at 11:00 PM
If those results hold, as Cpl Hudson would say
'game over, man". She was at the CPAC conference last year, and she does have an ability to turn a phrase, Her very apt 'gangster government' almost caused a conniption of Chris Matthews tonight
Posted by: nathan hale | April 16, 2010 at 11:03 PM
Is Clarice safely off to dreamland?
ok.
Djou has picked up 15 pts since the previous poll, in the latest he leads the split field by 3 pts:
Charles Djou (R) 32
Ed Case (D) 29
Colleen Hanabusa (D) 28
Posted by: Strawman Cometh | April 16, 2010 at 11:36 PM
Supremes mad about the O CIA informant dad Harvard money jobs presidencies, etc. What do the Supremes, Plames, O's, and royalty etc have in common?
Supreme protection.
Posted by: Master sabotage | April 17, 2010 at 12:03 AM
Oh lordy me, nathan:
I quit watching MSNBC but after your comment I went to look for the video. You didn't tell us that Ronnie Reagan Jr. was on it. According to him the participants at tea parties are fools, delusional, and bring loaded AK47s to rallies. Who knew?
Video at 1:40 mark
What a bunch of pussy cats. They really are more afraid of people that disagree with their ideology than real terrorists. Good Grief!
Posted by: Ann says Obama Sucks! | April 17, 2010 at 12:07 AM
Sorry about that, Ann,should have put a disclaimer like the skull symbol on poison,
Michael Reagan is much more his father's son
than the Dauphin ballerina
Posted by: nathan hale | April 17, 2010 at 12:17 AM
Nathan:
Everyone should watch that tape. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.
It is very hard to watch but so illustrative of what we are fighting.
But then again, I would like to remind everyone of how weak the opposition looks:
Former U.S. President Bill Clinton (R) attends a Democratic Leadership Council symposium to commemorate the 15th anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing at a Center for American Progress in Washington April 16, 2010
==============================================
Just a foolish, delusional, god loving, gun toting American observation.. niters!
P.S. I have no idea why they reported Clinton as an (R)?
Posted by: Ann says Obama Sucks! | April 17, 2010 at 01:19 AM
I have had too much wine, because I am beginning to believe Obama's dad was a CIA informant. How could anyone so persistent be wrong?
Posted by: MayBee | April 17, 2010 at 01:57 AM
c has persistently reminded us of the murder of Foley, the African USAID guy, who may well have had superior knowledge of Yellowcake.
There are at least three possibilities. 1. Real knowledge and real madness. 2. Real knowledge and assumed madness. 3. No real knowledge and real madness.
==================
Posted by: So who killed Foley and why? | April 17, 2010 at 05:00 AM
From a Toranto article via Instapundit - LUN
Levin's claim is self-refuting. If "most of them" were "homophobes, racists or morons," there would be no need for exaggeration. Levin is engaged in wishful thinking--and what a creepy thing he wishes for.
Posted by: Janet | April 17, 2010 at 06:08 AM
They're Killing Independent George
I don't get it - and I actually saw it in person and didn't get it then either.
I'm off to the republican convention and my second meeting with my BFF Scott Brown in 3 days. Caro is coming as "press". (Every radio station needs a photographer) and my live blog a bit from the press booth.
What a fun week I'm having.
Posted by: Jane | April 17, 2010 at 06:39 AM
MAY not "my"
Posted by: Jane | April 17, 2010 at 06:41 AM
I don't get it - and I actually saw it in person and didn't get it then either.
I think it's a line from a Seinfeld episode.
Posted by: jimmyk | April 17, 2010 at 07:11 AM
No need to put "press" in quotes for Caro! From what I saw she had more of a desire for reporting than what I've seen from the MSM in a long time. She noticed the beautiful moments, she was skeptical of some people, she listened, and she watched both the official press and the Tea Partiers.
LUN is a video from Newsbusters. Around the 8 minute mark some reporter leans in and tells the counter protesters she saw a sign that said "Save the seals, club a liberal".....someone in the crowd (maybe the filmer)asks where that sign was. Anyway, she sure seems to be on the "side" of the counter protesters.
Posted by: Janet | April 17, 2010 at 07:23 AM
Oh yeah, thanks JimmyK. I didn't get it either but now I do. I sometimes don't get the TV references. I've seen some "lizard signs" that I had to ask about...it is a reference to the show V.
Posted by: Janet | April 17, 2010 at 07:41 AM
Byron York, was pointing out on Greta, the difference between now and then, is that there
had been at least two provocations, in Ruby
Ridge and Waco, that really helped shape the
militia backlash
THey believe that we forget what happened the day, the week before, some people do have the
'attention span of a ferrit on double expresso' but most do not
Posted by: nathan hale | April 17, 2010 at 07:52 AM
I watched the original V and I don't really get this one, it's even less focused than Lost, they really need to show some originality in Hollywood, right like that's going to happem
In the LUN, some footage from the "Women of Joy" conference, that Sarah keynoted last night
Posted by: nathan hale | April 17, 2010 at 08:03 AM
Good morning from the Mass. GOP convention. I am sadly behind in JOM comment reading, but will try to hit the highlights of our day here. Jane had us on the road at 7am. I have radio press credentials and no mic in front of me like the big boys.
I am off to try to find some breakfast.
Posted by: caro | April 17, 2010 at 08:36 AM
I need my toolbar!
Just testing my photo posting skills here.
The sun going down on the DC Tea Party.
LUN
Posted by: caro | April 17, 2010 at 08:44 AM
Reading comments at Newsbird's place, someone mentioned that HuffPo is going after Laura Bush - calling the cover photo of new book "scary."
I so hate liberal loons. Busy Mom and Fashion Icon Michelle Obama can really, really look crazy scary in so many of her photos. Actually, I have noticed how many really bad pictures or her are being published and wondered if there isn't something subliminal going on, both with the picture takers and the picture publishers. It is like they give us images of her at her worst, and then dare us to comment negatively about them (on their behalf so they don't have to?).
I think the photo of MO in the spandex dress taken from behind as she bent over to greet someone is a clear example of what I mean. Who could not look at that photo and not gasp? I think it was intentional.
Sue and others have said her advisors must secretly hate her. No kidding. But I am starting to believe that some of the photographers secretly do too.
Posted by: centralcal | April 17, 2010 at 08:46 AM
I think I've made that point, too, on occasion,they aren't looking out for her best interest.the Huff Po, cuthulhu's black board,
I don't go there without properdecontami-nation gear, I mean what can they really say about Laura Bush, she was never reproachful in any way, there's the rub isn't it
Posted by: nathan hale | April 17, 2010 at 08:59 AM
Caro - LUN is the toolbar site
Posted by: Janet | April 17, 2010 at 09:05 AM
The 0.1.4.12 works on Firefox 3.6
Posted by: Janet | April 17, 2010 at 09:27 AM
and Caro, LUN is the blog "This ain't Hell". Jonn Lilyea is the writer. He has helped with investigating for Operation Stolen Valor.
Just FYI for the medal wearing guy at the Tea Party.
Posted by: Janet | April 17, 2010 at 10:41 AM
WiFi is very iffy!
I met TC in the lobby on my way to Dunkin Donuts. What a sweetheart he is!
Back for the preliminaries. Of note, the clergyman who did the prayer was way too long and he used the phrase "life, liberty and the pursuit of justice" as if it was straight from the Declaration.
Scott Brown of course got the rock star welcome. Did I mention that he is even more handsome in person?
He still drives a truck. Actually Jane and I walked the parking lots last Wednesday trying to find the truck to no avail.
Opening joke..."in the airport I was approached by a woman who said, you're that handsome man from Massachusetts! I said why, yes, nice to meet you. She left me saying...nice to meet you, Mr. Romney."
Posted by: caro | April 17, 2010 at 10:52 AM
Caro,
The reporter that had the computer and was recording stuff was AP Jerry Bodlander. LUN is a video with him reporting. It seems pretty fair. We were sitting on the ledge, and he was right behind us....we were stealth listeners!
Posted by: Janet | April 17, 2010 at 03:02 PM
Hey, something useful came out of all this nonsense. It caused a leak of a memo stating the obvious. Gates Says U.S. Lacks Policy to Curb Iran’s Nuclear Drive:
Maybe now we can stop pretending there's nothing to see here.Posted by: Cecil Turner | April 18, 2010 at 11:37 AM
"There was something oddly disproportionate about the just-concluded nuclear summit to which President Obama summoned 46 world leaders, the largest such gathering on American soil since 1945."
If Dr. Highly Educated White took a look at what is taught at all major Ivy-Inbred Academic Institutions then the Dr would not find Obama's actions all that oddly disproportionate.
Highly Educated Whites=Liberal's Useful Idiots
Posted by: susan | April 19, 2010 at 08:55 AM