Landis, Admitting Doping, Accuses Top U.S. Cyclists
VISALIA, Calif. — After maintaining his innocence for four years amid doping charges that ruined his reputation and caused him to be stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title, the American cyclist Floyd Landis has admitted using performance-enhancing drugs for most of his career, according to emails sent to several cycling officials.
In those emails from Landis, which were described Wednesday by two of the officials who received them, Landis wrote that he had used performance-enhancing drugs or methods since 2002, his first year racing with the now-defunct United States Postal Service team, once led by Lance Armstrong. The officials did not want his name published, citing ongoing investigations, including by federal authorities, into the content of the emails.
In those messages, which were first reported by the Wall Street Journal, Landis also detailed the performance-enhancing drug use of other top American cyclists on the U.S. Postal Service team, including Armstrong, the seven-time Tour de France champion. Other cyclists named in the emails were current U.S. road racing national champion George Hincapie, three-time Tour of California champion Levi Leipheimer and five-time U.S. time trial champion David Zabriskie.
...Landis, who served a two-year ban for doping and did not return phone calls for this story, told ESPN.com that he has no documentation to prove most of his claims.
...Federal authorities have spoken with Landis in recent weeks about the information in the e-mails, according to two people briefed on the matter.
Doping in professional cycling? Hold the front page. Of course, he can't prove its true and the people he is accusing probably can't prove him false.
Bike racing is one of the sports that I could care less about, but I've been amused at the rabid nature of the doping attacks on Lance Armstrong to the point where I've been on his side. The only blemish to me is that he's signed with the Nike whores.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 20, 2010 at 07:17 AM
Landis wrote that he had used performance-enhancing drugs or methods since 2002
OK,I get it,he was doping.
But what does "performance enhancing methods" mean?
Did he practice yoga or something? Studied ballet? Learned to play the harpsichord? Memorized The Rime of the Ancient Mariner?
I'd like to know what a performance enhancing method is that it would be something that needed to be admitted because it would be punishable.
I'm sure it's something rather obvious that I'm not thinking of -- something someone who follows cycling even minimally is probably rather surprised that I don't readily see it.
But I don't. It must be the decaf. Or the ambivalence. Probably mostly the ambivalence.
That reminds me. princess hit and run's birthday is next month,and she needs a new bike. She better start working harder on her harpsichord lessons,though.
Posted by: hit and run | May 20, 2010 at 07:56 AM
Think of all the plant food they exhaled.
====================
Posted by: Bill Clinton says feeding algae CO2 is like giving them steroids. | May 20, 2010 at 08:09 AM
Omigod, I'm jealous. A 'Roger Carr' has invented 'Meltdown Mann' at Bishop Hill's.
=========
Posted by: Link Under Name, scroll to the McIntyre thread, comment #73. | May 20, 2010 at 08:23 AM
Slip the juice to me, Bruce.
===========
Posted by: Never, never, never gonna speed again. | May 20, 2010 at 08:25 AM
Say what you will about cycling,
but bike racing commentators Phil Liggett and Paul Sherwen are treasures.
-
Posted by: BumperStickerist | May 20, 2010 at 08:34 AM
hit, the performance enhancing they use is blood doping, removing your own blood, storing it, and then reinjecting it. Gives your body more capacity to carry oxygen to muscle cells. And then they use certain drugs to hide the fact that they did this.
Posted by: peter | May 20, 2010 at 08:47 AM
Big Journalism --The Chicago FBI had a mole covering Rezko and Blago but Fitz hasn't let him testify to protect Obama who's in this corruption it would seem up to his eyeballs.
http://bigjournalism.com/acary/2010/05/19/tony-rezko-barack-obama-the-fbi-mole-and-the-chicago-msm/>Free the Mole
Posted by: Clarice | May 20, 2010 at 08:57 AM
Ahhh, thanks peter!
I wonder if anyone has ever thought of injecting other people's blood instead of their own.
Cycling vampires!
But would daytime races then be a problem?
Posted by: hit and run | May 20, 2010 at 09:10 AM
So Landis implicates Armstrong, Hincapie, Leipheimer & Zabriskie, but not Andreu. I'm shocked!
Posted by: Roger B. | May 20, 2010 at 09:25 AM
Don't miss the bgates post on the "I can literally..." thread.
Clarice, can a former president be indicted?
Posted by: caro | May 20, 2010 at 09:29 AM
Minus 16 at Raz; 45/53 overall (lowest since Obamacare passed).
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 20, 2010 at 09:50 AM
Jay Nordlinger's notes on Jane and Caro's Portuguese cruise.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 20, 2010 at 09:56 AM
Yes, Caro, I don't see why not. While in office, impeachment seems the only recourse for criminal activity, afterwards he's a mere mortal.
Posted by: Clarice | May 20, 2010 at 10:03 AM
Warning. Warning. Danger Will Robinson.
Why 1-In-10 Current Borrowers Will Lose Their Home To The Bank.
So go read the blog and gawk at the awful charts.
Posted by: anduril | May 20, 2010 at 10:18 AM
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/05/the_case_of_the_muzzled_mole_1.html>The case of the muzzled mole
Posted by: Clarice | May 20, 2010 at 10:22 AM
That seems like typical Fitz Clarice. I wish Andy McCarthy would explain to us again why he thinks the man has integrity.
Posted by: Jane | May 20, 2010 at 10:31 AM
Yeah. The SDNY US Attys Fraternity.
Posted by: Clarice | May 20, 2010 at 10:33 AM
You can't make this stuff up. Here's the AP, right on cue:
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 20, 2010 at 10:36 AM
Check it out at Drudge: the London Olympic mascots' faces look strangely like toilet seats. And the one in blue appears to have wet his pants. WTF?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 20, 2010 at 10:39 AM
Excellent blog from Steve Sailer:
Harvard has Undocumented Studier arrested
In the latest from the Annals of Not Getting the Joke, the New York Times reports:
This case is just more evidence that Congress must pass Comprehensive Admissions Reform granting a Pathway to Scholarship for the likes of poor Mr. Wheeler.
Posted by: anduril | May 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM
LUN daddy linked this article on the "I Infer..." thread.
"Scientist Booted Off Oil Panel Over Writing"
Those tolerant liberals are at it again...
Posted by: Janet | May 20, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Unexpectedly as in "not consistent with economists forecasts." But I guess we shouldn't expect DoT to understand that...or at least we shouldn't expect him to let it interfere with his morning paranoia dose...
Posted by: bunkerbuster | May 20, 2010 at 10:45 AM
Didn't the jugeared dunce campaign against putting politics over science that Boooosh was always doing? What, he didn't really mean it? The deuce you say....
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 20, 2010 at 10:47 AM
and if there's any spin in the AP bit, it's negative. They could have framed the number as continuing the trend, but they decided the more relevant context was "dashed hopes." I'm sure DoT's pleased that more people are out of work, anyway...
Posted by: bunkerbuster | May 20, 2010 at 10:47 AM
Why does Floyd Landis remind me of Arlen Specter? Perhaps simply because thinking of either of them makes me smile contentedly...
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 20, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Leading Index in U.S. Unexpectedly Dropped in April
The economists that Bloomberg surveys need to get their algos into the shop. That or go sit in the dunce corner next to last month's political prognosticators who were prepping us for that V shaped recovery that was surely just over the horizon.
BTW - this is the week used by the BLS in its determination of May employment. You can expect to see "unexpectedly" show up in the headlines on June 4th.
Again.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 20, 2010 at 11:15 AM
They give all the reason why the numbers were so low, so why did they think the trend was going to be any different
Posted by: narciso | May 20, 2010 at 11:17 AM
Bunkerbuster, what is your reasoning on how DOT's 10:36 AM post in any way demonstrates that DOT doesn't understand that "unexpectedly" is used in relation to economic forecasts? I think it's pretty obvious that MSM is reflexively accepting rosy economic forecasts and thus uses "unexpectedly" in these contexts. If MSM had been doing its job over time, it would have been scrutinizing more closely these forecasts. And what evidence is there in DOT's post that DOT is pleased that more people are out of work?
DOT, I realize you certainly don't need any defense from me against bunkerbuster or anyone else. For some reason I am intrigued by the reasoning of bunkerbuster.
In any event, lest DOT walk away with bunkerbuster's JOM Paranoia Award today, I hereby submit my own entry at the LUN, which entry I claim is another example of the demented nature of the Nanny Bureaucratic State. That should put me in the running for "JOM Paranoid" of the day!
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 20, 2010 at 11:20 AM
For some reason I am intrigued by the reasoning of bunkerbuster.
Watch DVDs of the X-Files where Scully and Mulder scrutinize the paranormal.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 20, 2010 at 11:27 AM
For some reason I am intrigued by the reasoning of bunkerbuster.
The problem is, there is no reasoning involved. Bunkerbuster is a reflexive leftist partisan; it is more likely his comments are cut-and-paste from a script than it is he puts thought into them.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | May 20, 2010 at 11:28 AM
Zev Chafetz has an op-ed piece in the NY Times assessing "The Limbaugh Victory."
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 20, 2010 at 11:29 AM
Thanks TC, but I'll have no further truck with that fool.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 20, 2010 at 11:29 AM
And TC, the lunatic at LUN has you beat for paranoia any day of the week.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 20, 2010 at 11:31 AM
Captain Hate, I admit that I can't top Howard Dean accusing the NY Times of doing a hatchet job on a Dem by running a negative article on Blumenthal taken from opposition research. I hereby cede any claim I have to a "Paranoia Oscar" to Howard Dean!
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 20, 2010 at 11:42 AM
TC,
Perhaps "unexpectedly" should be used as a marker for a pseudo-Keynesian? No on from the Austrian school can be surprised by the continuing failure of the policies instituted by Bozo and the Democrat Clown Posse.
Economies run on trust. Nobody in anywhere near their right mind would trust the Kendonesian commie and his cronies to do anything other than steal.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 20, 2010 at 11:45 AM
Janet,
Thanks for the link to the Wash U scientist's controversial analysis. It strikes me that you can disagree with the implications of his assertions, but they hardly affect his ability to analyze physical science.
I suppose that Obama would like to dismiss for cause the Supreme Court justice who said that the way to stop discrimating on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race. After all, anybody capable of that type of reasoning is simply incapable of rational thought on any subject.
My youngest brother received his PhD in physics from Wash U. a few years ago. He is very conservative--for example, his family refuses to use items manufactured in China*. You can't imagine how difficult it is to shop for 5 kids' birthdays with that condition. OTOH, he was not caught out by that toxic drywall scam when remodeling his house... As not-so-recent alum, I'm pleased to see that the professor hasn't been driven out.
_______
*Abortion policy, not politics or economics.
Posted by: Walter | May 20, 2010 at 11:47 AM
Rick, it would be interesting to compare the predictions of modern Austrian schoolers with mainstream economic forecasters with respect to how the economy would react to ObamaEconomicViagra. Noone who has read Hayek would be surprised at the flaccidity of the economy's reponse.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 20, 2010 at 11:50 AM
I admit that I can't top Howard Dean accusing the NY Times of doing a hatchet job on a Dem by running a negative article on Blumenthal taken from opposition research.
Keep in mind that what pissed Dean off is that the story was about a Dem, not that the NYT ran a story based on opposition research done by a campaign.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | May 20, 2010 at 11:52 AM
Then again, Hayek's and Von Mises before them,
main critique was against the interventionist
of the historical school, namely Schmoller and Wagner, who shaped prewar Austrian and even German economic policy, in contradiction
of Smith and other laissez affaire proponent, I found that from Caldwell's bio on Hayek
Posted by: narciso | May 20, 2010 at 11:56 AM
I hereby cede any claim I have to a "Paranoia Oscar" to Howard Dean!
In fairness, and in keeping with the thread topic, he has a prescription pad.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 20, 2010 at 12:02 PM
"Keep in mind that what pissed Dean off"
I would think that the Democrats think the NYTs belonged to them and would only publish stories that make Republicans look bad. The story must have made them feel betrayed. Anyone know the last time the NYTs published a story that made a Democrat look bad?
Posted by: Pagar | May 20, 2010 at 12:07 PM
Narciso,
The main body of Hayek's work (and certainly Mise's Socialism) consisted of a dissection of the 'Tinkerbelle theory of economics' generated by Endarkenment lackwits who very consistently misapplied 'scientistic' (Hayek's description) principles derived from a misunderstanding of the limited scope of the actual scientific method.
Socialism was printed in 1926, never rebutted (it was studiously ignored by the progressive simpletons of its time), and proven prophetic some 65 years after publication with the collapse of the USSR. In one sense we are continuing to experience the 'proving' of the Austrian's prophecies today.
None of what is happening is "unexpected" in the slightest.
Except to prog geese who are startled by sunrise every morning, of course.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 20, 2010 at 12:18 PM
Narciso,
The main body of Hayek's work (and certainly Mise's Socialism) consisted of a dissection of the 'Tinkerbelle theory of economics' generated by Endarkenment lackwits who very consistently misapplied 'scientistic' (Hayek's description) principles derived from a misunderstanding of the limited scope of the actual scientific method.
Socialism was printed in 1926, never rebutted (it was studiously ignored by the progressive simpletons of its time), and proven prophetic some 65 years after publication with the collapse of the USSR. In one sense we are continuing to experience the 'proving' of the Austrian's prophecies today.
None of what is happening is "unexpected" in the slightest.
Except to prog geese who are startled by sunrise every morning, of course.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 20, 2010 at 12:18 PM
You can say that again, Rick, but don't. Caldwell's bio was pointing out something which is rarely discussed, the particulars of
the scientistic philosophy, notably Schmoller
and Wagner (I had read Fallows' discuss List
as the basis for the Japanese industrial miracle, not so much anymore though)
Posted by: narciso | May 20, 2010 at 12:21 PM
Fitz, Fitz, Fitz. What kind of Hell must he live in?
====================
Posted by: He's gotta believe someone's out to get him. | May 20, 2010 at 02:33 PM
"I'm pleased to see that the professor hasn't been driven out."
I'm pleased to see that the professor hasn't been driven out yet.
Posted by: daddy | May 20, 2010 at 09:31 PM
It's true. Armstrong was arrested and detained in France on arrival at CDG in '98 for smuggling controlled substances...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...soap, toothpaste, mouthwash, deodorant, etc.
Old joke. I never tire of it.
Posted by: Mustang0302 | May 20, 2010 at 10:10 PM
Nice one mustang. Hadn't heard it, but oh so true:)
Posted by: daddy | May 20, 2010 at 11:13 PM
Cut the crap, boys. It is pretty usual occurrence to unemployment numbers to go up when economy (or at least GDP) began to improve. People who lost hope for employment just began job search again at first indications of improving economy. Nothing unpredictable about that.
Posted by: AL | May 21, 2010 at 04:54 AM
Care for a breath mint, AL?
They're legal here you know.
Please, I insist.
Posted by: Mustang0302 | May 21, 2010 at 05:18 AM
``we are continuing to experience the 'proving' of the Austrian's prophecies today.''
Wow. Still unproven after all these years. What would it take?
You have to be pretty down on the entire human race to believe that at no point has any society been smart enough to avail itself of the Austrian miracle method for economic organization.
Maybe reality's a bit more complicated. Maybe the Austrian's insights are but a single window on the great big world, where things tend not to go as planned or expected....
Posted by: bunkerbuster | May 21, 2010 at 06:38 AM
None of what is happening is "unexpected" in the slightest.
Except to prog geese who are startled by sunrise every morning, of course.
Why, good morning, bb! Sleep well?
Posted by: Mustang0302 | May 21, 2010 at 07:00 AM
Right, bb. Cambodia didn't go as expected, either.
=====================
Posted by: That petrified honk is projection. | May 21, 2010 at 07:27 AM
The problem we were discussing earlier, Rick, is in thie excerpt from Caldwell, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | May 21, 2010 at 07:58 AM