Let's celebrate the Kentucky Derby by saddling up a couple of conspiracy theories.
First up, the "Vera Baker and Barack Obama, sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G" allegation, now being resurfaced by the National Enquirer. This got a bit of play prior to the 2008 election, and later got a whiff of oxygen with Christopher Andersen's book:
As reported in the book, Andersen claims that a Vera Baker became closer than normal to President Barack Obama during his campaign for the Senate in 2004, so much so that Vera Baker was dropped from the campaign, they say, at the hands of Michelle Obama and subsequently moved to the island of Martinique.
From Barack and Michelle: Portrait of an American Marriage:
"When Baker suddenly and inexplicably vanished from the campaign and resurfaced on the Caribbean island of Martinique, tongues reportedly began wagging. A jealous Michelle, it was suggested, had engineered Baker's departure."
And also ready to ride - the oil spill truthers, hinting that the BP oil rig debacle may have been a politically motivated man-made disaster!
Let's cut to El Rushbo:
RUSH: There was an explosion. There was an explosion and some people died in this. ...Now, Homeland Security is investigating what happened here, which should inspire lots of confidence that we're gonna get to the bottom of it. Then the regime is going to have a statement here on the oil spill in the Gulf coming up pretty soon. After the regime speaks on this, we'll have a better idea because however this happened, accidentally, however it happened, the regime's going to use this for all it's worth. (laughing) We know this. So it really doesn't matter, Mike, if this was an accident or an act of sabotage. The regime will use the occasion of this event to its own political advantage.
...RUSH: Ladies and gentlemen, I didn't hear this myself, but I have been informed that President Obama is sending SWAT teams to the Gulf oil rigs. SWAT teams? I'm waiting on audio sound bite confirmation of this, but why in the world would you send SWAT teams to Gulf oil rigs? Oh, I know! Obama probably thinks the tea party blew up the rig. That's what it is. (laughing) Yes. Of course the tea party did it! (laughing) Seriously, you know, this rig... We had this call from a guy out there who said nobody's talking about whether this was an act of sabotage because I guess they can't prove it, but they're going to send SWAT teams down there? He was going to send a SWAT team to the rig that blew up or are you going to send a SWAT team to other rigs? What's going on here? Remember, this rig blew April 21st, which is one day prior to "Erf" Day.
I have a story here from Reuters, September 24th, 2008 (shuffling paper) right here in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers: "Nobel Peace Prize winner and environmental crusader Al Gore urged young people on Wednesday to engage in civil disobedience to stop the construction of coal plants without the ability to store carbon." So you got the guru here urging civil disobedience, you got the regime sending SWAT teams down there to all the rigs in the Gulf. They're sending SWAT teams to all the rigs in the Gulf! Whoa ho-ho-ho. So obviously Obama thinks the tea partiers are expert scuba divers as well or maybe they have their own fleet of underwater submarines that can go deep enough to go undetected, set explosives, and hightail it back to the protests in Ohio, or wherever they (laughing) happen to be.
So 15 years of no global warming. "That's just anecdotal! It doesn't disapprove anything! It doesn't disapprove that there's a man-made threat going on." But one oil spill -- one oil spill which might have been intentional -- is enough to prove that offshore oil drilling is unsafe and should never be done. This is the logic we're forced to live with. There hasn't been any warming in 15 years, that doesn't mean anything. Those e-mails were hoaxed! The readings at the climate unit in East Anglia, they were all made up. "Doesn't matter. What matters is who leaked those e-mails. What the e-mails said doesn't matter." But those guys made it all up, and they wouldn't produce the data that led to their conclusions. They say they lost it. "Doesn't matter. Doesn't matter at all!" But it hasn't warmed in 15 years. "It doesn't matter." But I just saw a story you guys say you're looking for the "lost" heat. "Doesn't matter." One oil rig blows up, and it proves we can't dig, drill, find more oil.
That sounds like clowning around. However, the left went wild with this:
RUSH: I want to get back to the timing of the blowing up, the explosion out there in the Gulf of Mexico of this oil rig. Since they're sending SWAT teams down there now this changes the whole perspective of this. Now, lest we forget, ladies and gentlemen, the carbon tax bill, cap and trade that was scheduled to be announced on Earth Day. I remember that. And then it was postponed for a couple of days later after Earth Day, and then of course immigration has now moved in front of it. But this bill, the cap-and-trade bill, was strongly criticized by hardcore environmentalist wackos because it supposedly allowed more offshore drilling and nuclear plants, nuclear plant investment. So, since they're sending SWAT teams down there, folks, since they're sending SWAT teams to inspect the other rigs, what better way to head off more oil drilling, nuclear plants, than by blowing up a rig? I'm just noting the timing here.
Well, "SWAT" was a metaphor, although one might think a master communicator like Obama would be more careful. Apparently, the "SWAT" teams are not police and they are not looking for bombs:
A "SWAT team" of US minerals Management Services (MMS) inspectors are checking blowout preventers (BOP) across the Gulf today following reports that the crew of the Deepwater Horizon unsuccessfully tried to activate the BOP before evacuating.
Can we find unexpected support on Rush's left flank? We can if we squint:
There are, of course, other questions to be asked. We do not know what caused the blowout or the fire, or why the valves that are supposed to shut off the oil flow in an emergency did not work.
Questions have been raised! We seem to know this:
The Macondo well - a discovery well which was to be temporarily abandoned ahead of later completion as a subsea producer - blew out late last Tuesday evening.
The well had been drilled to 18,000 feet when an explosion rocked the semi-sub before the rig was engulfed in flames. The semisub sank on Thursday morning, extinguishing the blaze.
A senior Transocean executive, Adrian Rose, said the company had not begun to determine if the rig, which was found in 5000 feet of water Saturday, could be salvaged.
...
The initial cause of the accident is still unknown, although Rose earlier indicated it seems likely the well blew out.
“We don’t know what caused the accident,” he said. When asked if the incident involved a blowout, he replied: "Basically, yes."
Eleven of the 126 crew on board the Deepwater Horizon at the time of the explosion are missing, presumed dead.
So, could the initial explosion have been eco-terrorism? I might think that the Administration was seriously considering that possibility if I thought they were sending SWAT police teams to investigate other rigs. With the revised fact set, less so. Fires and explosions happen.
But there are two conspiracies for Saturday. Pick 'em! Or don't - Obama has so many problems with policy and popularity that he would probably welcome a scandal as a distraction.
Off to see Sarah Palin in KC!!
Whoo, hooo.
Posted by: Pofarmer | May 01, 2010 at 09:24 AM
I'll take both conspiracies for $5, TM. It's a rather dull Saturday with little to do but watch the economies of the Western world implode due to preposterous politicians and the stupid voters who elected them.
Posted by: Clarice | May 01, 2010 at 09:26 AM
Obama's two finance directors
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/john-stephenson/2008/10/13/will-media-investigate-obama-affair-rumors> Two, count them, two
Posted by: Clarice | May 01, 2010 at 09:38 AM
Mark Levin had a caller last night who was on the rig when it blew.
Go to Mark's website and click on the the interview with "James" for the audio.
Posted by: BB Key | May 01, 2010 at 09:41 AM
Happy Derby Day! Wish I had some mint for juleps.
Pofarmer,
Have a great show, as the Deadheads say, and report back!
Posted by: Porchlight | May 01, 2010 at 09:43 AM
No conspiracy here. Pam Geller did some good work: Free Speech 1, CAIR 0: RefugeFromIslam.com Ads Going Back Up in FL.
Posted by: anduril | May 01, 2010 at 09:45 AM
My man Iowahawk chimes in with a howler on Gore.
http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2010/04/citizen-gore.html
Posted by: Clarice | May 01, 2010 at 09:57 AM
Vera Baker blew up the rig! 'Thar she blows.'
Posted by: Barry Dauphin | May 01, 2010 at 09:59 AM
Heck of a job, there, Ken, in the LUN
Posted by: nathan hale | May 01, 2010 at 10:00 AM
Is it true that the concrete curing process represents a particularly vulnerable time for these rigs?
nh-
Suspect that timing is one reason there's been so little coverage that it was a well coming on line. Not an operating well yet.
Posted by: rse | May 01, 2010 at 10:04 AM
FEMA still hasn't been enlisted to work on this.
Perhaps they are all doing campaign work for the O man.
Posted by: Clarice | May 01, 2010 at 10:16 AM
Go to Mark's website and click on the the interview with "James" for the audio.
Thanks for pointing that out; Mark is *the* man in talk radio imo and that provided a lot of useful info; ie the stupidity of shutting down all Gulf of Mexico rigs over this. Never let a crisis go to waste. Say hello to $4 gas and subsequent demonizing of oil companies.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 01, 2010 at 10:16 AM
Ptobably so, it isn't it curious that the first time this happens in quite some time, is under this crew, incompetence is always a better first guess, than deliberate malfeasance, but that wasn't and what the left is seizing upon now.
Posted by: nathan hale | May 01, 2010 at 10:17 AM
incompetence is always a better first guess, than deliberate malfeasance, but that wasn't and what the left is seizing upon now.
As our trolls prove regularly, what passes for "the left" in this country are a bunch of illiterate lunatics who are immune to rational thought processes.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 01, 2010 at 10:23 AM
I expect that from them, Captain, frog and scorpion, and all that, and more and more
the folks putatitively on our side, 'the clean toga' crowd as Clarice puts it, that ball themselves up like an armadillo, is
the next crew. Bob McDonnell not wlling to
cower in the corner, is a good sign, the
rest not so much
Posted by: nathan hale | May 01, 2010 at 10:46 AM
OT, but Tom might want to check out Aaron Klein's book coming out next week. http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/01/on-my-desk-the-manchurian-president/>Ed has a teaser. When Obama really met Ayers for the first time.
Posted by: Sue | May 01, 2010 at 10:52 AM
Since it's May 1 we may be mercifully troll free as they cluster in
bullshitstudy sessions with their co-apparatcheks to figure out how they're gonna make communism work this time around. God knows how many people will have to beliquidatedre-educated this time around; an actual inconvenient truth.Posted by: Captain Hate | May 01, 2010 at 10:57 AM
Regarding the oil spill, us on the east coast of Florida are probably thinking how we have escaped beach damage from it and how badly it will affect the west coast of Florida. Not so. LUN
We are right on the beach, only steps away, over the dunes walk-over. Mostly a coquina beach but we have sea turtle nests, squadrons of pelicans fishing, osprey, dolphins and in the winter right whales. This could get real messy depending on wind direction, tides and currents.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | May 01, 2010 at 10:57 AM
Nick Clegg says 'the sky's the limit'
New Orleans, Nick. BP is now owned.
So, what do you think a bunch of retarded luciferians will be doing with BP? Cat 6 global warming super hurricane and it's all gone.
Posted by: peuner | May 01, 2010 at 11:03 AM
I'd hold off a little on predictions like that, until we actually see where the currents
go, I remember well, the apocalyptic predictions of a toxic stew of chemicals after
Katrina, that never really materialized, I live a little farther from the water, so I'm
hoping this prediction isn't true.
Posted by: nathan hale | May 01, 2010 at 11:12 AM
Who is there to hold them accountable for sabotage and murder? Eric Holder?
Posted by: Simon | May 01, 2010 at 11:13 AM
NH,
Its not a prediction so much as a scientific analysis and I have actually seen red and brown tides move from the gulf through the straits and up the gulf stream to contaminate our beaches and air. Talk about respiratory ailments - noting like having to breathe brown tide micro-particles all day long. This could happen for real and the Florida dept. of emergency management knows it can and are preparing for that eventuality. Waiting isn't a response.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | May 01, 2010 at 11:23 AM
Well, I believe Longboat Key is safe. Whew! Let's hope Narciso is right and the reports are as hyperbolic as they were with Katrina.
Posted by: Clarice | May 01, 2010 at 11:29 AM
Well Sue, I guess Ed, and Aaron Klein are birthers. Even though the focus is on Obama's adult friendships and associations...if anyone questions Obama's past, according to the MSM, they are birthers. That is why I consider myself a birther...I wonder about the birth of Obama's political beliefs.
Posted by: Janet | May 01, 2010 at 11:30 AM
Henry Blodgett notes that Maybe Goldman Really Is Screwed: Criminal Probe Started Before SEC Case And Goes Far Beyond ABACUS, and links to this WaPo article: Justice probe of Goldman goes beyond deals cited by SEC.
Says Blodgett:
That echoes the Post story:
Posted by: anduril | May 01, 2010 at 11:31 AM
From Powerline:
Is It Obama's Fault?
from Power Line by John
Tonight I was listening to Hugh Hewitt as I drove to the grocery store, and got so engrossed that I missed my exit. What was so interesting? Hugh was arguing that the Obama administration failed to respond promptly to the oil spill in the Gulf, and that its belated response was inadequate.
Is that a fair charge? Normally, I would be slow to blame government at any level for a natural (or, as here, man-made) disaster. But the basic facts are curious: the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded on April 21, nine days ago. This was no minor event; at least 11 workers were killed. The resulting oil slick has been evident, covering many miles, for some days now. Yet the federal response lagged.
...
UPDATE: Oddly, the New York Times is documenting the Obama administration's failures:
BP officials said they did everything possible, and a review of the response suggests it may be too simplistic to place all the blame on the oil company. The federal government also had opportunities to move more quickly, but did not do so while it waited for a resolution to the spreading spill from BP, which was leasing the drilling rig that exploded in flames on April 20 and sank two days later. ...
The Department of Homeland Security waited until Thursday to declare that the incident was "a spill of national significance," and then set up a second command center in Mobile. The actions came only after the estimate of the size of the spill was increased fivefold to 5,000 barrels a day.
The delay meant that the Homeland Security Department waited until late this week to formally request a more robust response from the Department of Defense, with Ms. Napolitano acknowledging even as late as Thursday afternoon that she did not know if the Defense Department even had equipment that might be helpful.
Officials initially seemed to underestimate the threat of a leak, just as BP did last year when it told the government such an event was highly unlikely.
Posted by: anduril | May 01, 2010 at 11:37 AM
Just as it was all Bush's fault for (you name it if it happened in his adminstration--or even after), well now, this must be all Obama's fault.
Posted by: Coomanche Voter | May 01, 2010 at 11:44 AM
Inconveniently, history never seems to end. This article notes that Turkey is Stirring the Bosnian Pot. Closing paragraph:
Neo-Ottoman? Yes. The article documents Turkey's claims made by its FM and by Erdogan himself:
"From the 15th to the 20th century, the history of the Balkans was a history of success. We can have this success again."
"Turkey will never abandon Bosnia and Herzegovina and considers it a moral and historic responsibility to stand by this Balkan nation."
Posted by: anduril | May 01, 2010 at 11:48 AM
Here is the house the green extreme movement will expect us all to live in. LUN
From the Sunday supplement Parade.
No thank you.
Posted by: Janet | May 01, 2010 at 11:53 AM
Instead of The Little House on the Prairie it's The Really Little House that's a Dump.
Posted by: Janet | May 01, 2010 at 11:55 AM
Years ago, a safety engineer from the insurance company I worked for used a roll of film to take pictures of obvious safety infractions on an offshore drilling rig that we insured. These were mostly dangers to the workers, rather than dangers of the well blowing. Still the pictures were dramatic. They showed that management just didn't care about safety.
And, don't forget that nature doesn't always work the way we'd like it to.
My point is, one doesn't have to look for mysterious conspiracies to explain a rig disaster.
Posted by: David in Cal | May 01, 2010 at 12:08 PM
jib-
Am in the panhandle much of the time and here's hoping it is being hyped to be the crisis that helps drive cap & trade.
My heart goes out to LA and Miss in the mean time.
Please link again as you see valid FL impact analysis.
You too narciso.
Posted by: rse | May 01, 2010 at 12:10 PM
Thank God you got to say that. Enjoy the hurricanes.
Posted by: Howsmartwasthat | May 01, 2010 at 12:12 PM
Hawking is denying himself too.
Posted by: rtwasthat | May 01, 2010 at 12:32 PM
My prediction is that if Barack's dalliance is exposed (so to speak), both Vera and Barack will become fertilizer for Michelle's vegetable garden.
If I were Barack and I found a Michelle email to Elin Nordegren asking how much it would be to buy one of Elin's golf clubs, I'd be very worried.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 01, 2010 at 12:38 PM
That's an interesting definition, that Erdogan
is suggesting, that goes from the fall of Constantinople, the takeover of Greece, the Russian confrontations in the Balkans, up to the Itijihad, oh it's all good.
Posted by: nathan hale | May 01, 2010 at 12:39 PM
Mort Zuckerman offers what seems to me to be a very lucid explanation of derivatives trading for the financial layman--i.e., most of us--under the somewhat deceptive title: Mort Zuckerman: Congress Had a Role in the Financial Crisis.
Why deceptive? Because his coverage of Congress' undoubted responsibility only comes at the end. The explanatory part, the major part, is well worth the read for novices in this field who want to get a handle on the basic idea--or so it seems to me.
Two areas that he doesn't develop enough #1 or at all #2:
1. I think he could have developed the lack of transparency (as compared to futures trading) much more, since it's basic to his overall argument;
2. My impression is that part of what fueled the balloon in derivatives trading was the belief that there would always be a federal bailout in the offing for the biggest players. That was the bet that Goldman made, I suspect, and they won it big time--and not for the first time.
Posted by: anduril | May 01, 2010 at 12:45 PM
correct nate. of course, i hesitate to criticize turkey in any way, shape or form since they're the closest regional ally of our (the US's) own closest regional ally. then people would accuse me of all sorts of evil things, along with sibel edmond who warned of turkish shenanigans as a clearinghouse for nuclear proliferators.
Posted by: anduril | May 01, 2010 at 12:48 PM
The story I'm pasting in illustrates what has also become a big problem in European countries that have large Muslim populations--the trafficking in under age "brides." Immigrant populations bring their cultures with them. Muslim cultures include the desire to squelch all criticism (see my link to Pam Geller, above) and other unsavory practices:
Alleged child-bride marriage stuns Nigeria (Senator marries 13 year old)
Fox News ^ | 5/1/2010 | AP
From FR: Posted on Sat 01 May 2010 11:46:29 AM CST by AngieGal
The marriage took place at one of the Nigerian capital's most recognizable landmarks, under the golden dome of the National Mosque in front of an audience of the elite.
But the recent wedding of one of the Muslim leaders who brought Shariah law to Africa's most populous nation is under scrutiny as human rights groups say he married a 13-year-old Egyptian girl.
As authorities investigate Senator Ahmad Sani Yerima, the marriage is drawing fresh questions about the role of religion in a country of 150 million people split between Christians and Muslims.
Yerima, 49, arranged the marriage with the girl after paying her family a $100,000 dowry, according to a complaint filed by the Nigerian Human Rights Commission in April. Initially, Yerima couldn't arrange a visa for the girl to travel from Egypt to Nigeria, so he instead brought the girl through neighboring Niger, said Chidi Odinkalu, a lawyer who works for the open Society Justice Initiative.
That leaves Yerima open to human trafficking charges, as well as possible child-sex and endangerment charges, the lawyer said.
Posted by: anduril | May 01, 2010 at 12:54 PM
What are the Turks whining about? They didn't do dick to help the Bosnian muslims in the 90s other than NATO participation. As it was, I was pretty much opposed to Slick bombing the hell out of the Serbs from high altitudes (and conveniently blowing up the Chinese embassy in a wonderful display of the red-nose predator's "smart diplomacy") in a conflict that was primarily ginned up by the MSM lying out their asses on the extent of the casualties (somebody has to explain to me some day why the media hates the Serbs so fucking much). I guess it turned out ok in that Ledeen keeps reporting how much the Bosnians and Kosovars are pro-western (although I've also heard about a lot of Orthodox churches being completely trashed which the MSM would conveniently ignore as not fitting the narrative) but hearing the Turks making noise about this makes me want to reclaim Constantinople as a long-term goal.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 01, 2010 at 12:56 PM
Oh, bombing Serbia was part of the super smart Neocon strategy that would prove to Muslims that America was their friend and we'd all live together happily ever after, and Muslims would be happy allies of everything else we did.
Posted by: anduril | May 01, 2010 at 01:06 PM
That was one of the instances that I found the hypocrisy of even the so called liberal hawks, like Misha Glenny, who was arguing for exactly this sort of operation, all through
the 90s, in the Times, the Review of Books, et al. but when Kosovo came about, then it
was an aboutface. In retrospect we know now
the KLA had much more extremist ties, to
Iranian and Salafi elements, some of them
welcomed into Europe, by our 'good friend'
Peter Galbraith
Posted by: nathan hale | May 01, 2010 at 01:11 PM
Doug Ross has a good timeline for the GUlf oil disaster:
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2010/05/obamas-katrina-illustrated-timeline.html>Good job O man
Posted by: Clarice | May 01, 2010 at 01:14 PM
Well, despite my gut feeling of being against helping out rock worshippers, the Bosnians and Kosovars seem to be a significant cut above the Wahabbi nutjobs and their perv ilk. And I still can't understand why those congressional idiots decided to rub the Turk's noses in the Armenian genocide from out of nowhere (and yes, I realize the Turks have been real a-holes on not owning up to something that obviously happened; I just don't know where the idiots like Pelosi and Reid decide to make a big deal about a non-current event last year, although maybe I just answered my own question).
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 01, 2010 at 01:16 PM
The idiots running our foreign policy also thought it would be a good idea to stiff the Russians, traditional allies of the Serbs. That was just the beginning of the decline in our relations with Russia which are now causing us so much discomfort. Far better to have let the Serbs and Croats do their partition.
Posted by: anduril | May 01, 2010 at 01:30 PM
Clarice--while you were posting the Doug Ross piece--which is excellent--I was posting an equally brilliant but considerably less supported piece arguing the same thing. (Which of course disappeared somewhere).
Where the hell were the Feds? Shouldn't Napolitano or Salazar have been coordinating with the other federal agencies, the military, and major oil companies to get damage control underway--and as rapidly as possible?
"With a quick solution to shut off the spill looking out of reach Friday, the governement and the oil industry struggled to contain the resulting slick and keep it from shore. The American Petroleum Institute alerted members that Interior Secretary Ken Salazar wanted advice from the industry on how to manage the spill by the end of Friday....On Friday evening the National Guard was mobilized to assist in the cleanup..." Thats from TODAY'S WSJ--well over a week after the thing blew.
No leadership--just blame everybody else. Unbelievable.
Posted by: Boatbuilder | May 01, 2010 at 01:45 PM
"God knows how many people will have to be liquidated -re-educated this time around; an actual inconvenient truth.
Captain, Billy the Bomber Ayers has been waiting for this day since he first dreamed of the liquidation, er, re-education camps. Social Justice --a long time coming, man.
Posted by: Frau Einundachtzig | May 01, 2010 at 02:52 PM
Not to worry. Pres.Ray di Tutto has ordered the wisest of his wise advisers to report to him in four weeks with a report on how to prevent this type of disaster from happening again, evah.
Posted by: Frau Einundachtzig | May 01, 2010 at 03:04 PM
I think Billy the Bomber Ayers has made enough money. Nice house, wealthy neighborhood, speaking fees, book royalties, wealthy parents...yep, he's made enough.
Posted by: Janet | May 01, 2010 at 03:10 PM
Yippee! I just participated in the latest Rasmussen poll by telephone. Too bad the same questions will not be on the ballot.
Janet, you are so correct about Billy the Bomber, saved by his rich father from paying his debts to society.
Posted by: Frau Einundachtzig | May 01, 2010 at 03:17 PM
Frau, that is my new mantra for everyone..."I think you've made enough money."
Posted by: Janet hasn't made enough money | May 01, 2010 at 03:29 PM
Social Justice --a long time coming, man.
Bingo, Frau; plus I think little Billy still gets flushed and agitated by the prospect of a racial civil war. A deep thinker he ain't.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 01, 2010 at 03:33 PM
--A deep thinker he ain't.--
No but he writes a corker of an autobiography.
Sometimes he even writes his own.
Posted by: Ignatz | May 01, 2010 at 04:10 PM
In other immigration news, hordes of litigation lawyers are descending on the Gulf Coast.
Posted by: Clarice | May 01, 2010 at 04:20 PM
LUN are some pictures from today in Greece.
The protesters are throwing molotov cocktails at the police.
Not enough money in the world to bail out this mindset of entitlement.
Posted by: rse | May 01, 2010 at 04:34 PM
Our local McClatchey newslette quoted a Greek as saying that the Greeks had a rather negative view of the Germans because they work too hard. (lol The joke is that today's Germans are resting on earlier generations' laurels.)
Posted by: Frau Einundachtzig | May 01, 2010 at 05:18 PM
Clarice, those immigrating lawyers may cause the edge of the Gulf to capsize.
Posted by: Frau Einundachtzig | May 01, 2010 at 05:20 PM
anduril:
"The explanatory part...is well worth the read for novices in this field who want to get a handle on the basic idea--or so it seems to me."
Thanks for the Zuckerman article which was, indeed, very helpful. I'm such a novice that I didn't actually realize that derivatives = futures. Good thing I stick to commenting on self-evident economics in these threads! JOMFolk are great about taking the time to answer a lot of pretty basic questions.
Posted by: JM Hanes | May 01, 2010 at 05:38 PM
Frau, OMG! And I think when that happens New Orleans will be in China.
Posted by: Clarice | May 01, 2010 at 05:44 PM
JMH-
Technically, a share of stock is a derivative of proprietorship.
The explosion in OTC derivatives arose due to two primary factors, both based on driving quarterly earnings (P&L sheets of each "desk" in the big box banks).
The first being the nature of OTC (over-the-counter) trades, they are private, unregulated transactions and, therefore, carry no legal restrictions on fees (generally 8.5% is the legal cap).
The second derives from the first, the privacy of the transaction and its unregulated nature means the standards for marginability, usually governed by the Federal Reserve under Reg T:
"T 12 CFR 220
Credit by Brokers and Dealers
Governs extension of credit by securities brokers and dealers, including all members of national securities exchanges (See also Regulations U and X.)" More on FRB regs here, if curious.
In this scenario, due to the OTC ebvironment, the margin required for each transaction met no standards nor minimums and frequently, due to a firm "netting out" the cost versus other similar transactions already on the books, used no cash at all.
A HUGE house of cards.
And now here we sit, not addressing the problem, because Congress is too dependent upon the cash flow from this type of trade.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | May 01, 2010 at 06:11 PM
"Not enough money in the world to bail out this mindset of entitlement."
Nope. The Greeks just hired Lazard rather than Credit Suisse to handle the "reorganization". I tally that as a win for SocGen and a loss for DeutscheBank. It's also another bullet in the chamber of the gun held to Merkel's head.
It's rather interesting that the Greek demos doesn't want a bailout almost as badly as the German people don't want to give them one. Thank goodness the EU and IMF are available to throw $159 billion (from where?) into the Greek money pit in order to...
Prolong the agony?
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 01, 2010 at 06:12 PM
rick-
geriatric kick-the-can.
It only goes inches down the road.
Spain is going to contribute 4B euros? From where? Portugal 800M? who are they kidding?
This is going to be a huge disaster.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | May 01, 2010 at 06:21 PM
Rick, I have been tardy in responding to your questioning my exclusive focus on GSE reform in a prior financial thread. I acknowlege that I could be accused of "nothing but-ism." However, I think Congress has to start somewhere, and that the type of discipline that would be needed to be shown by lawmakers in focusing on the GSEs might spill over into other areas. In other words, start with GSE legislation and move on from there. One step at a time, and legislation that focuses on a specific issue (I know, I sound naive, but at some point it is going to become clear to Congress that it must become serious).
I realize that there is no hope of taking a serious look at financial reform until the GOPers regains control in Congress, and that many GOPers are as prone to listen to credentialled morons as Dems.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 01, 2010 at 06:29 PM
I think it is preposterous to think Greece will change with the infusion of new money--or Portugal or Spain or Italy or California.
Posted by: Clarice | May 01, 2010 at 06:43 PM
Clarice, with the sovereigns, the governing phrase is not "too big to fail," it's "too profligate to succeed."
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 01, 2010 at 06:51 PM
New money may not change the UK, but a Eureferendum post shows voter Fraud could.
" The officer at the council showed me his computer screen to validate my details, what was then immediately noticeable that some moderate sized houses on my road had 40-50 registered voters registered to them which were at most able to accommodate 8 people."
Elections there are only a few days away.
Posted by: Pagar | May 01, 2010 at 07:06 PM
TC,
Perhaps we disagree only upon the starting point. Mel's post above highlights the area where I would hope to see a beginning. When the Wall Street sporting house and casino operators received an exemption from regulation in '98 for CDS and other derivatives due to the fact that "only a very limited number of highly sophisticated players" would be involved it created an opportunity that was exploited straight through to failure and bankruptcy by many very "sophisticated" collection of highly credentialed morons making huge bets with other peoples money.
That would have been a very instructive outcome had not the Wall Street bookies laid off their bets with insurance bookies who did not possess the resources to pay off without turning to the public fisc. The actual argument might be that starting with the GSEs is more appropriate due to their attachment to the public teat from inception but I would have to think about that a bit more as we watch the EU sprint off a financial cliff without any help whatsoever from a GSE.
Derivatives and complex structured finance deals designed to obscure rather than reveal are common to both the US and EU as aspects of the crisis (as is evasion and avoidance of compliance with the Basel II accords). That's my main argument with beginning with them rather than with the GSEs.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 01, 2010 at 07:19 PM
Rick, I would be fine with reform starting with derivatives and structured finance deals, especially if folks like you and Mel were driving the bus. Perhaps I'm cynical, but I fear that the last thing the folks who are actually driving the bus will consider is the best framework (a la Hayek) for folks to pursue their moneymaking activities.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 01, 2010 at 08:08 PM
Katrina marked the beginning of Bush's political demise. This oil spill will probably mark the beginning of Obama's rebirth...
Much in the same way that Katrina came just as other key points:Iraq and the economy, were turning south for Bush, this oil spill comes just as the economy is righting itself and the war in Afghanistan is stabilizing...Wagers, anyone?
Posted by: bunkerbuster | May 02, 2010 at 09:32 AM
--Much in the same way that Katrina came just as other key points:Iraq and the economy, were turning south for Bush--
Huh? GDP growth continued for over three more years after Katrina and 2005 was shortly before the Iraq war was turned around via the surge.
But I am curious as to why you think Barry needs a rebirth, especially after his signal triumph of Obamacare.
BTW bb, despite your amazing ability to form an erroneous opinion on nearly every issue I'd like to recognize and compliment your relative equanimity and lack of vituperation.
Posted by: Ignatz | May 02, 2010 at 09:54 AM
TC,
I'd pass in a heartbeat. I have no interest whatsoever in promulgating regulations to attempt to control thieves seeking access to the Treasury, whether via FASB, Basel II? or SEC. I note another "peace in our time" announcement re Greece. It appears that the EU does not have sufficient means or structure to bail out a very small and economically insignificant member. Thank goodness the IMF (with the US Treasury providing 17% of funds) is available in order to maintain the Greeks in the style of profligacy to which they have become accustomed.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 02, 2010 at 09:59 AM