Marc Ambinder dove into the tank for Adam Serwer of The American Prospect with his "Myth-busting Monday" round-up, which included this:
No, the decision not to pursue the Black Panther case from election day was not made by political appointees. The political appointees who would have made the decision had not been confirmed yet, reports Adam Serwer
Seriously? Adam Serwer completely fluffed the timeline and the allegations, and is back-pedaling faster than the Knick officials who promised their fans LeBron. [And Bonus Backpedaling from Dave Weigel, who was my target of scorn yesterday.]
A brief recap of the Serwer contribution:
His first Big News was that the case was downgraded to a civil
charge by BushCo before it was filed in Jan 2009.
No kidding -
mainstream reporting (e.g., NY Times, Fox, John Fund of the WSJ, Fox from May 2009) have
described it as a civil suit. The real controversy revolves around the
DoJ decision in May 2009 to more or less drop the suit *after* they had
won a default judgment. Needless to say, by May 2009 some of the Obama
people were in place.
2. Serwer's other Big Breakthrough is that
Ms. Fernandes, who allegedly told the Voting Rights division not to
pursue black-on-white fraud or intimidation cases, could not have been
part of the Black Panther decision since she wasn't at DoJ in May 2009.
Again,
who cares? J. Christian Adams, the aggrieved DoJ source, never said she was part of
that specific case; he has specifically alleged she was part of other
decisions, such as not pursuing motor voter fraud or felon purges.
Here is a Serwer UPDATE to his original post where he digs in a bit:
UPDATE: I should make it clear that I'm not the first person to mention this (Media Matters has been pointing this out for a while) Perez revealed the date the case was downgraded in his public testimony to the U.S. Civil Rights Commission in May. It's been part of the public record for weeks--which is why I don't understand why so little of the coverage of this story mentions it. I'm simply pointing out that none of the political appointees being blamed for dismissing the case were even at the DoJ when the case was dismissed.
Then a follow-up retreat:
A few commenters on my previous post about the Obama administration not being in office when the decision was made not to pursue a criminal case against the New Black Panther Party are arguing out that conservative outrage is over the subsequent decision, made in May, not to further pursue the civil complaint after obtaining an injunction against the individual who was holding a baton. That decision was made by a career official at the Justice Department after an evidence review and reportedly approved by an Obama political appointee, Associate Attorney General Thomas J. Perrelli. The decision was still made by career lawyers in the section; there's no evidence, beyond J. Christian Adams' statements, that Perrelli had the case dismissed.
Mr. Serwer then goes on to explain that, well, even though Obama appointee Perrelli was in place, no one has proved he was involved (and he won't testify), and anyway, it was a reasonable decision. Gee, that is almost the same as the first story, except for being utterly reversed.
On Ms. Fernandes (a former Student of Barack) we get this cursory confusion:
At any rate, the decision to approve not going forward with the civil case was still made a month before Deputy Assistant Attorney General Julie Fernandes joined the DoJ and sometime afterward supposedly issued a decree against cases involving minority defendants.
So contra the Ambinder summary, Serwer now admits that the Obama people were just where the critics said they were in time to do what they are alleged to have done. For whatever reason, that new post is not getting as much play.
RELATED BASHING: Keith Olbermann does the full swan dive into the tank with Serwer's non-news. Larry O'Connor of Big Journo and Battlin' Bob Somerby have more.
LET'S HAVE A QUICK 'DASH TO DUMB':
The first entrant in our moral inequivalence watch will be Dave Weigel, explaining why the New Black Panther case is No Big Deal:
All that said, the problem I have with the new obsession with this is, really, that there's no evidence the NBPP's clownish Philadelphia stunt suppressed any votes, or that they'll try such a stunt again.
Ben Smith is a strong entrant:
As I noted on the day, the two uniformed Panthers were staking out a heavily Democratic polling place -- it had gone 95% for Kerry -- and you don't typically intimidate your own voters.
So this November, if a few rednecks waving Confederate flags in a mostly white district chase away a few stray ethnics, these two will be OK with it?
Please - no news outlet will cover anything else, and Weigel and Sully will race each other to blame Sarah Palin.
3:10 TO PIMA: In a bold attempt to get ahead of, or at least alongside, the next likely sally from the Serwer/Weigel duo, what about the 2006 incident in Arizona that was never pursued by Evil BushCo? Over to Media Matters:
Christian Adams' case continues to implode: Bush-era DOJ declined to charge Minutemen for voter intimidation
July 01, 2010 12:44 pm ET - by Jeremy Holden
Conservative media figures are busy hyping the unsubstantiated allegations of GOP activist and former Justice Department attorney J. Christian Adams that the Obama administration improperly dismissed voter-intimidation charges against members of the New Black Panther Party for racially charged political reasons. As Media Matters previously noted, Adams' allegations are based on hearsay and on charges made by others. But his allegations become even flimsier when considering the fact that he worked in the Bush Justice Department in 2006 when attorneys declined to pursue charges that members of the Minutemen were intimidating Hispanic voters in Arizona, charges based on nearly identical circumstances.
"Nearly identical" circumstances? Nearly! We will uncover a difference or two before the end.
Mr. Holden does a bit of legwork and provides this contemporaneous coverage from the November 8, 2006, Arizona Daily Star:
A crew of anti-immigrant activists, meanwhile, visited several South Side polling places in what one poll-watch group called a blatant attempt to intimidate Hispanic voters.Anti-immigrant crusader Russ Dove circulated an English-only petition, while a cameraman filmed the voters he approached and Roy Warden stood by with a firearm in a holster.
Diego Bernal, a staff attorney with the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF), said the trio was trying to intimidate Hispanic voters. "A gun, a camera, a clipboard before you even get to the polls - if that's not voter intimidation, what is?" he asked.
If it's not intimidation, what is it? Possibly street theatre:
Bernal said his group encountered the men at the Precinct 49 polling place at South 12th Avenue and West Michigan Street and began documenting the scene with their cameras. "There was an interesting period where they were taking pictures of us taking pictures of them."
Hmm, did the monitors outnumber the intimidators? In a first class example of the power of blogs, a Kossite actually took to the streets on election day 2006 to track down these scary guys. The story:
"Men With Guns Harass Latino Voters" blared the headline on Daily Kos. I clicked and read a quote from a TPM Muckraker post:
I just spoke with a Latino election monitor in Arizona who said that a trio of men, one with a handgun visible, is harrassing Latino voters as they go to the polls in Tucson, Ariz.
Tucson? That's where I live. I read more and found that this incident took place "at a polling place in Tucson's Iglesia Bautista precinct." Which is less than 2 minutes from my home. I jumped in the car and grabbed my camera. I'm a photographer and a student of photojournalism at Pima Community College.
And the gist - the three agitators went to heavily Latino/Democratic districts with lots of Dem monitors around, observed the 75 foot rule, and asked a few people to sign an 'English-only' petition. That seems to be legal; as to whether it is intimidating, well, I am trying to imagine two or three of the New Black Panthers pulling their shtick in a 95% white neighborhood while surrounded by local cops and monitors.
In that scenario, and speaking as a middle-aged white guy, the only fear I would have is that I would lose a contact lens while giving them the eye-roll. Perhaps I am made of sterner stuff. OK, perhaps not.
ON TO POST C AND PLAN C: Adam Serwer is back with yet another clarification; his latest gambit is to simply insult the intelligence of his readers:
So, I just wanted to clear something up: I wrote my post yesterday about the Justice Department's decision not to pursue criminal charges against the NBPP during the Bush administration because I had seen conservatives arguing that it was made by the Obama administration. It wasn't. I did not mean to suggest that the civil case, which the DoJ dropped in May of last year after receiving a preliminary injunction against the only NBPP member in Philadelphia who was walking around with a baton, was dismissed during the Bush administration. I apologize if any of my writing has been unclear on this point or any confusion has resulted because I misstated the accusation of who wanted the criminal case dismissed.
He's sorry it was unclear, but his response was really directed at one episode of The Factor and one Washington Examiner editorial that complained about the dismissal of charges in May 2009 and could be fully corrected by changing one word from "criminal" to "civil" (they mischaracterized the initial filing).
Let's see - the lead of his first post was this:
I did an interview with New York Daily News Columnist Errol Louis about the New Black Panther Party case today and realized that there's a specific data point that has been lost in all the breathless coverage of this case and whether or not it represents a racist agenda from the Obama administration: The decision not to file a criminal case occurred before Obama was even in office.
So really, when he wrote "lost in all the breathless coverage", he meant, and were supposed to know, that he meant 'misstated occasionally'.
Conservative activist and former Voting Section Attorney J. Christian Adams identified United States Associate Attorney General Thomas J. Perrelli as the person who ordered the case dismissed, but he wasn't confirmed until March, three months after the case was downgraded.
How could that confuse or mislead anyone? Surely a knowledgeable reader will know that, hmm, Perrelli was in office when the case was dismissed, so I am not sure what a knowledgeable reader would conclude.
All of which kind of puts a rather large wrinkle in the right-wing fantasy that the decision to pursue a civil rather than criminal case against The New Black Panther Party members was a racist decree handed down from the racist leadership of the Obama administration.
A civil/criminal "right-wing fantasy" held by few in the right wing, since the real objection is to the dismissal of charges in May. But Mr. Serwer intended that passage to be clear.
And from his first Update:
I'm simply pointing out that none of the political appointees being blamed for dismissing the case were even at the DoJ when the case was dismissed.
Other than, of course, the ones who were, by May 2009. Uh huh. And I am simply pointing out that either Serwer was absolutely at sea as to the facts and should admit it, or he should come back with an even more creative Plan D (Maybe the dog ate his notes? Or maybe BP spilled oil on them! Yeah, that's the ticket!). But this apology for being unclear? He was perfectly clear - he was also perfectly wrong.
And lest you wonder, Mr. Serwer has not built up so much credibility that I am interested in his insights into the customary application of these laws. If the right Dem flack told him they only applied to extra-terrestials, that would leap from TAP to Olby by Friday.
I wonder if TM has a way of sending these critiques to Armbinder et al., or if he just has to hope that they'll read them.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | July 13, 2010 at 09:34 AM
I'll gladly pay up Tuesday for the macedoine over the weekend.
==========
Posted by: A great big gob of green leafy spinach, please. | July 13, 2010 at 09:47 AM
Like the World Wildlife Fund explaining to the pretty little head of some reporter quizzical about AmazonGate. 'We tend not to comment in contexts where there doesn't seem to be a desire for balanced coverage.' Now they tell us.
========
Posted by: REDDi, get set, go! | July 13, 2010 at 09:49 AM
George Steinbrenner died
Posted by: Janesquaredance | July 13, 2010 at 09:52 AM
I sent it to him just now, DoT.
That'll give the Atlantic all stars a chance to come up with yet another story for TM to skewer.
Posted by: Clarice | July 13, 2010 at 09:53 AM
Good for you, C. Nice to know these clowns can't assume they're fooling everybody.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | July 13, 2010 at 09:55 AM
Since I could find no contact info I had to put it in the comments section--available for reading by anyone who reads the piece.
Posted by: Clarice | July 13, 2010 at 10:06 AM
If Ambinder does have the stones to take it up I'm betting he'll do his level best to pooh pooh all the obvious problems Adam Serwer's misfire and twist it into conservatives sniping over little details. Sort of like how he insists there is a birther problem yet seees no issues with his colleague's Trig Birther obsession overall.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | July 13, 2010 at 10:20 AM
TS9!! How nice to see you.
How is the Atlantic staying afloat with all this wackiness anyway?
Posted by: Clarice | July 13, 2010 at 10:24 AM
Dave Weigel also "broke" this big news yesterday in The Daily Dish. Don't know which Atlantic flunky stole it first.
Posted by: Old Dad | July 13, 2010 at 10:24 AM
The Amvinder link, leads to Serwer's piece, which has some push back, in the comment section
Posted by: narciso the harpoon | July 13, 2010 at 10:25 AM
Splendid. Ole farm hand Marc Ambinder is still tending to his young crops. They need more water Marc, not more sunlight. Break out your fire hose before Serwer burns himself alive.
Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland | July 13, 2010 at 10:26 AM
I thought Journolist disbanded.
Posted by: Sue | July 13, 2010 at 10:27 AM
Hi Clarice
Nice to see you too.
One aspect of Townhouse/Journolist is it shows what a bunch of children they are as you see all these conservative hating liberals apply the "no oxygen" rule to facts that get in the way of their agreed upon narratives,and when the facts get too much to deny they all -- like little sheep -- twist the story into petty little grievances.
They just can not admit they screwed up.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | July 13, 2010 at 10:33 AM
Sue,
I don't think it's possible to disband a hivemind.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | July 13, 2010 at 10:34 AM
True, Rick, the Borg were proven to be loath to disconnect from the collective. So they are paid to be third rate scribes the kind
that Orwell sketched out like Syme, yet they
offer this puerile Minitrue blather
Posted by: narciso the harpoon | July 13, 2010 at 10:39 AM
--They just can not admit they screwed up.--
These aren't matters of opinion; they're basic, elementary facts.
Is there no such thing as an editor anymore?
Are fact checkers no longer employed by anyone?
There just don't seem to be any adults to take the color crayons away from the kids when they start writing on the walls anymore.
Posted by: Ignatz | July 13, 2010 at 10:44 AM
Rick,
Me either. They just culled it a little.
Posted by: Sue | July 13, 2010 at 10:45 AM
F the press. I hope they all get the fates they so richly deserve.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | July 13, 2010 at 10:45 AM
Serwer is updating himself again. LUN. I think he's syaing that the Black Panther case that he was talking about was not the Black Panther case TM and other critics were talking about. And besides, all those complaining justice department officals are a bunch of right wingers, anyway. Frankly, his article reads like code, and I have misplaced my Little Orphan Annie Progressive Detector Code Ring.
Posted by: Appalled | July 13, 2010 at 11:06 AM
... but this proves that Barack Obama probably wasn't involved in the JFK assassination (he would have been 27 months old) ..
.. but if he finds the same "time machine" that Trig Palin uses to go back in time to become Andrew Sullivan's father, it could be possible but not probable.
Posted by: Neo | July 13, 2010 at 11:07 AM
RIP Steinbrenner. Sad. I know he was the man everyone loved to hate, but he was legend nonetheless.
Posted by: Porchlight | July 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM
now there is an election coming up this November. Are there going to be Black Panthers at voting stations with uniforms or clubs. I hope if they are there are cameras to give everyone a good show.
Posted by: martin j smith | July 13, 2010 at 11:43 AM
The constituents know more than the Congressmen!
(I've been posting this about 3 times, so if a lot of them show up...I'm sorry!)
Posted by: Janet | July 13, 2010 at 11:51 AM
As an owner who produced results, Steinbrenner was second only to Jerry Buss of the Lakers. But it's a distant second. RIP
Posted by: Danube of Thought | July 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM
Gabriel S:
I think your nugget in the previous thread is worth posting again:
Julie Fernandes was an Obama student in Chicago -- and is listed as a group member of :
Gotta love that group's avatar. Has anyone ever mapped out all these Chicago links graphically? It would tell quite a story.It's not just that Obama soaked up the Chicago way, it's that he's never known anybody outside of Chicago. When he runs out of Chicago appointees, he's dependent on other more experienced Chicago hands, like Rahm and John Podesta, to fill in the blanks.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 12:00 PM
Here it is (very tiny!)
Is it in the shape of an acorn? Maybe not.
Posted by: Janet | July 13, 2010 at 12:09 PM
It would be like that powerpoint from hell on Afghanistan, JM, so I guess she didn't read
the civil rights cases,except out of a Derrick
Bell primer either
Posted by: narciso the harpoon | July 13, 2010 at 12:09 PM
Speaking of Chicago, in the process of trying to track down Eric Holder's "Nation of Cowards" speech, I ran across this odd Blagojevich connection from 2004:
That was a $300,000 assignment, btw. How did Blago light upon Holder, I wonder? Elsewhere, the Sun-Times observed that: But rest assured, there's a Gorelick Wall between the White House and the Atty General when it comes to controversial decision-making at the DoJ.Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 12:53 PM
But rest assured, there's a Gorelick Wall between the White House and the Atty General when it comes to controversial decision-making at the DoJ.
Yesterday it came out that every time the DOJ had to make a decision on the NBP's case, someone from DOJ met with Cassandra Butts at the WH - hours before the decision was due.
Posted by: Janesquaredance | July 13, 2010 at 01:13 PM
Wow, there was just an amazing cat fight between Megyn Kelly and Kirsten Powers over the New Black Panther Party case. Andrea Tantaro just sat back at the end, as the two blondes did battle. I hope someone posts it to You Tube.
Posted by: mefolkes | July 13, 2010 at 01:47 PM
It wasn't a fair fight from what I understand,
Kirsten, often is clueless on most of these
matters,
Posted by: narciso the harpoon | July 13, 2010 at 01:55 PM
Riddle me this Batman ...
Posted by: Neo | July 13, 2010 at 01:56 PM
That's about the most unsurprising news we've had all week, isn't Jane? Major congrats and big hugs for your move to the Hub!
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 01:57 PM
The Sport et Musique, makes Gitmo seem like summer camp, you don't get the confy barcalounger and the cable over there
Posted by: narciso the harpoon | July 13, 2010 at 02:01 PM
You just have to keep torturing me with that, jmh...don't you?
Good catches on Blago and Fernandes.
well if Fernandes learned con law from "Prof" Obama, no wonder she thinks unconstitutional behavior is okay.
In the end-all the incompetence of this administration may not cost O as much as Holder's dumb moves on the NBP party and Az.
Posted by: Clarice | July 13, 2010 at 02:05 PM
OT: Hmm, surpising:
"Job openings dropped in May from the previous month and layoffs edged up, fresh evidence that employers are reluctant to add workers."
LUN
Posted by: jimmyk | July 13, 2010 at 02:06 PM
Narciso, who cares if the fight was fair or not. Two hot blondes with tempers flaring was fun to see. Actually, I think that Powers is one of the fairest and calmest of the Dems, but she has her moments when she is very frustrating. Powers actually did seem clueless. You are right in that.
Posted by: mefolkes | July 13, 2010 at 02:12 PM
Allah's going to have a hard time when he posts the clip, picking ahem sides
Posted by: narciso the harpoon | July 13, 2010 at 02:18 PM
Weigel weasles over at the Dish.
Posted by: Old Dad | July 13, 2010 at 02:24 PM
Video here:
http://stephenkruiser.com/2010/07/13/megyn-kelly-pwns-kirsten-powers-on-nbpp-case/>Pwned. Was Kirsten reading Atlantic?
Posted by: Clarice | July 13, 2010 at 02:29 PM
Lots of things in the Holder CV seem more interesting in retrospect -- here's just a simple juxtaposition from Wikipedia. First this:
That would be Colombia, currently on the list of soon-to-be-former allies. Does anyone else recall some rumored Congressional/ Administration links which showed up on captured FARC computers?Fast forward to 1999, where I found myself revisiting some details of Holder's 2nd most notorious recommendation for clemency:
Eric Holder, the indispensable Igor.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 02:32 PM
Awwww JMH - those were the days!
Posted by: Janesquaredance | July 13, 2010 at 02:35 PM
JMH, He seems to have found a unique way of findng new clients.
Posted by: Clarice | July 13, 2010 at 02:40 PM
I can stop any time!
But not before I post an excerpt from the speech I originally set out to find, and which got thoroughly subsumed in the reaction to Nation of Cowards:
I'm not seeing a lot of daylight between Holder and Julie Fernandes.Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 02:43 PM
Eric Holder is the most corrupt and incompetent AG in the history of our Nation. Of course, he serves the most inept Marxist ideologue to serve in higher office.
Posted by: jgreene | July 13, 2010 at 02:44 PM
Ace has the video of Megyn and Kirsten, for those interested.
Posted by: centralcal | July 13, 2010 at 02:45 PM
In the video, I love how the constituent is better informed than the Congressman....actually many constituents from the boos heard in the video.
Posted by: Janet | July 13, 2010 at 02:45 PM
Jane:
Mark Steyn will be saying, "I knew her when," any day now.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 02:48 PM
It's like the Bizarro Atty General, a flack for terrorist, front men for the mob, the company that created 'hillbilly heroin' the
facilitator of the 'rendition' of Elian back
to be state property, It's a tough call but I'd say he's the worst of Obama's high profile
appointments
Posted by: narciso the harpoon | July 13, 2010 at 02:48 PM
I think Holder and Obama are arm in arm on just about everything.
Posted by: Janesquaredance | July 13, 2010 at 02:52 PM
Sorry - looks like Clarice had the video link, I didn't see!
Posted by: centralcal | July 13, 2010 at 02:53 PM
This should help the NAACP cause:
Per Fox News (Megyn Kelly), NAACP passes resolution finding parts of Tea Party racist, and calling or repudiation of racist views.
The NAACP is a one trick pony. Desperately trying to keep redistributionist policies in place. Its moral force is becoming nil, sounding more like the Reverend Jackson, who became just another Chicago thug.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vjnjagvet | July 13, 2010 at 02:57 PM
Posted by: Neo | July 13, 2010 at 03:05 PM
Congrats, Jane!
Posted by: fdcol63 | July 13, 2010 at 03:09 PM
You think the Megyn/Kirsten smackdown was something? Wait till Jane and I have a final mud wrestle for Steyn. FAIR WARNING.
Posted by: Clarice | July 13, 2010 at 03:09 PM
Only if you wear thongs.
Nude is too much, but a little material hides just enough to retain some mystery.
LOL
Posted by: fdcol63 | July 13, 2010 at 03:27 PM
"NAACP passes resolution finding parts of Tea Party racist, and calling or repudiation of racist views.
When will the Tea Party's Jeff Foxworthy appear?
If you're a typical white person.... you might be a racist.
If you've only been speaking truth to power since the Stimulus Bill passed.... you might be a racist.
If you drive a pick up truck.... you might be a racist.
If you drive a pick-up truck from Wrentham.... you're probably a racist.
If you have ever driven a pick up truck across the Mason-Dixon line.... you're a doubleplus ungood racist.
If you're a black conservative.... you might be an Uncle Tom, which is the only thing worse than being a racist.
If you're black and voted for Obama.... you are not a racist.
If you're white and voted for McCain.... you're a racist.
If you're black and voted for McCain.... you're a traitor to your race, which obviously makes you a racist.
If you don't think Sgt. James Crowley is stupid.... you might be a racist.
If you think Boston Police are Boy Scouts.... you might be wrong.
If you make politically incorrect jokes about racism.... you might want to change your screen name if you aspire to public office.
I can stop any time.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 03:39 PM
Please don't JMH. LOL
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vjnjagvet | July 13, 2010 at 03:41 PM
Oops, left out:
If you're white and voted for Obama.... you're not a racist anymore.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 03:43 PM
Can I put that on You Too JMH?
Posted by: Janesquaredance | July 13, 2010 at 03:45 PM
Eric Holder is the most corrupt and incompetent AG in the history of our Nation.
As to corrupt, I'll pass, but incompetent? By this point in her tenure Janet Reno was at the one year anniversary of burning eighty people to death. Elian Gonzalez was just a gleam...
Posted by: Tom Maguire | July 13, 2010 at 03:52 PM
Shouldn't the NAACP change their name to NAAPoC?
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2010 at 03:52 PM
For those that followed the link to Battlin' Bob, according to my copy of "Black's Law Dictionary" the word "prosecute" can apply to both civil and crimnal actions. Thus is O'Reily vindicated and the Lefties beclowned.
Posted by: bmcburney | July 13, 2010 at 03:54 PM
Saw Powers over the weekend talking about SB 1070. Slam dunk for the feds, she said, because "states can't pass a law dealing with foreigners--period. It's in the Constitution."
Help me...
Posted by: Danube of Thought | July 13, 2010 at 04:06 PM
She didn;t used to be so dumb. Is she hanging around t the Atlantic?
I think we ought to start a National Association for the Advancement of Americans.
Posted by: Clarice | July 13, 2010 at 04:09 PM
Jane:
Sure. You might want to change the attribution to JMH, though.... which would be OK with me. :-)
"If you're white & voted Obama" was supposed to go after "if you're back & voted McCain."
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 04:13 PM
Allah's going to have a hard time when he posts the clip, picking ahem sides
Neither has what beta-boy is looking for in a woman: tats, piercings, excess body fat, strap-ons.....
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2010 at 04:23 PM
"Eric Holder is the most corrupt and incompetent AG in the history of our Nation."
AG Rankings:
Most Corrupt = Robert F Kennedy
Most Incompetent = Janet Reno
Most Ideological = Eric Holder and A. Mitchell Palmer
While Holder and Palmer have almost opposite ideological orientations (Palmer hating anachists, commies and other leftists -- Holder hating conservatives, liberterians and other righties) they both use their ideological progressive zeal to go after enemies and protect friends with means fair or foul. Holder is a zealot, but he's not incompetent (a shame) and he's not proven yet to be personally corrupt. He's the Admin's hatchet man and he revels in it.
Posted by: NK | July 13, 2010 at 04:23 PM
NK:
How are you defining corruption?
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 04:30 PM
I don't get that about RFK, surprising considering where I'm from,
Posted by: narciso the harpoon | July 13, 2010 at 04:36 PM
JMH,Narcisco--
RFK and corruption? professional-- using his office in congress and AG to persecute the weak to obtain higher office; taking the job of AG to use legal muscle for political ends his brother could not accomplish as pres.; doing the Mafia's bidding -- for whatever reason-- I choose to believe he did it for the worst possible reasons; personal corruption: prostitutes, serial adultery, neglecting his wife and kids. That's enough for me.
Posted by: NK | July 13, 2010 at 04:46 PM
"Hmm, surprising"
Not to mention unexpected.
jimmyk,
Tie it together with the 4.4% decline in personal tax deposits and the NFIB - No Joy report for a trifecta of "unexpected" (only by credentialed morons "in the know").
The Dems need to ditch the jackass as party symbol and switch to Wile E. Coyote staring between his feet at the canyon floor - a lonnnng way down.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | July 13, 2010 at 04:54 PM
JM Hanes -
The ....you might be a racist idea is GREAT!
Posted by: Janet | July 13, 2010 at 04:54 PM
Really, when I think of RFK, I don't think of him knuckling down to the Mob, if anything one might suspect the opposite got him killed.
now you could question his go between role during the missile crisis, but I don't get it
Posted by: narciso the harpoon | July 13, 2010 at 04:55 PM
((Are fact checkers no longer employed by anyone?))
when the product is propaganda, evidently not
Posted by: Parking Lot | July 13, 2010 at 04:56 PM
2004 was a really fruitful year for Mr. Holder. Sheesh.
Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland | July 13, 2010 at 04:57 PM
Apropos of nothing, I give you Eleanor Clift, writing in Newsweak:
Cut-n-pasted from RCP today.
If mendacity or obtuseness could be measured in a pharmaceutical grade purity scale...
Posted by: lyle | July 13, 2010 at 04:59 PM
It's a shame that Jane and Clarice are in such a bitter competition over Steyn's favors. Were it not so, Clarice could link Jane's JMH "You Might Be a Racist" list in this Sunday's Pieces.
The list is a great idea - Brava, JMH.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | July 13, 2010 at 05:00 PM
Sheesh. Eleanor Clift is not the only lefty who thinks Obama is just not shouting loudly enough. GWB deliberately chose to be invisible as a monumental courtesy to Obama. I loved the recent Laura Bush interview where she joked that everybody in the family has taken up blaming George for everything too. Obama may not have blamed Bush persuasively, but it's hardly for want of trying.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 05:09 PM
well, I was thinking of stealing it anyway, Rick. Just to keep in practice.
Posted by: Clarice | July 13, 2010 at 05:13 PM
Narcisco--
the mafia got JFK/RFK prostitutes and drugs. RFK got Hoffa convicted and the Mafia took over the Central States Teamsters pension fund for 20 years, turning it into the "mafia's bank". RFK and Hoffa did business with the mafia and both thought they were too big for the mafia to "touch". Hoffa's bad judgment and attempted come back cost him his life. RFK/JFK? -- history has no proof, I choose to believe the worst about them and the mob. Occam's Razor says too many connections to be coincidence.
Posted by: NK | July 13, 2010 at 05:16 PM
JMH did you see the article that says that Mooveau Riche is furious that Laura's new book isn't all about Mooveau?
LUN
Posted by: Stephanie | July 13, 2010 at 05:18 PM
"Sheesh. Eleanor Clift is not the only lefty who thinks Obama is just not shouting loudly enough."
Blame Bush is, apparently, sort of a Unified Field Theory on par with AGW.
Kind of sad to hear that Eleanor has spent the last 18 months never having heard a word O has spoken. Has she fallen deaf? Poor dear.
Posted by: lyle | July 13, 2010 at 05:29 PM
You Might be a racist if - is up.
And I think Rick is brilliant!
Posted by: Jane says obamasucks | July 13, 2010 at 05:52 PM
People like Clift are so mired in their echo chambers that they don't even notice when someone routinely blames Bush for everything. It's like that background hum that you only notice when it stops.
Posted by: jimmyk | July 13, 2010 at 05:53 PM
Thanks, Janet, Rick! I think the possibilities ..... might be endless. I'd say lyle's Unified Field Theory has some real potential too.
Stephanie -- It's like she's playing painting in the attic to Barack's Dorian Gray.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 05:53 PM
What fun, Jane!
A whopping Thunderstorm has stalled out smack dab over my house. Probably a sign that I should back away from the computer.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 05:59 PM
Neo thanks for your 3:05.
When all the rating agencies agree the emperor has nice clothes, a new guy backed by those who have money in the game will come along to tell the truth. If not Dagong, somebody like them is past due.
When those ratings gain acceptance and start impacting borrowing rates more, it will not be long before the Mark emerges from the Euro. It already explains why it is so painful to trade dollars for SwFr...
Posted by: Old Lurker | July 13, 2010 at 06:04 PM
I'd say John Mitchell has to be included in any pantheon of corrupt AG's. Dude was the only one ever to do time in stir.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | July 13, 2010 at 06:04 PM
Re: Holder - As to corrupt, I'll pass, but incompetent? By this point in her tenure Janet Reno was at the one year anniversary of burning eighty people to death. Elian Gonzalez was just a gleam...
The power behind the throne? Remember whose shoulders Reno cried on all those years.
Putting so many guilty, corrupted and unindicted folk in his cabinet and czardom parallels protecting, er, putting Gorelick on the 9/11 Commission.
Posted by: Frau Indianerfrau | July 13, 2010 at 06:05 PM
I'd like to have been a fly on that Commission wall, Frau, just to see Gorelick in action. When folks finally noted her massive conflict of interest, it was like every guy on board was competing to play her knight in shining armor.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 06:14 PM
Hey Danube--
Not to split hairs but Mitchell was convicted of conspiracy/obstruction for actions as CREEP chairman not AG. Personally, protecting the pres. to me --even though it was criminal-- is less corrupt than anything RFK, Holder, Palmer or even Reno pulled. Mitchell also stuck by a mentally ill and alcoholic wife. Now a better corruption case against Mitchell is all of the 1960s municipal bond deals he floated, those probably stunk to high heaven.
Posted by: NK | July 13, 2010 at 06:26 PM
JMH--
agreed, Jamie Gorelick is the most corrupt -- and moronic-- Deputy AG ever.
Posted by: NK | July 13, 2010 at 06:28 PM
The left will always find a distaff Republican
to deliver a death blow to any center right figure they feel needs to be taken out, they
couldn't take out Cheney, so they aimed for Libby, with all the shrapnel they could loose
upon the target
Posted by: narciso the harpoon | July 13, 2010 at 06:29 PM
Hans von Spakovsky just makes mincemeat of Adam Serwer:
He also explains that most of the cases are civil or start out as such -- read the whole thing at LUN
Posted by: Topsecretk9 | July 13, 2010 at 07:35 PM
Point taken, NK--but he was at CREEP at the same time he was AG, so I don't tend to cut him any slack.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | July 13, 2010 at 08:10 PM
JMH, YOU PUSSY--I STAYED RIGHT HERE THRU THE LIGHTING BOLTS EVEN THOUGH MY APPLE TEMPORARILY VANISHED.(sorry about the caps--didn't notice the lock was on....)
Posted by: Clarice | July 13, 2010 at 08:35 PM
CLARICE, YOU HUSSY -- I WENT OUTSIDE AND THREATENED THE STORM GODS WITH A GOLD CLUB!
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 08:53 PM
(sorry about the d in golf club, but my hands are still cramped from holding the thing aloft...)
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 13, 2010 at 08:55 PM