I am less enthused about the 'Unmosqued' tapes:
Unmosqued: Steve Emerson Unearths Tapes of "Moderate Bridge-Building" Imam Rauf
They have had these tapes for a month - how long does it take to find the Imam Wright saying "God Damn America"?
And post-Sherrod, they are wasting their time editing the tapes - people will be satisfied by a full release and nothing less.
We will hear soon enough, I hope.
Those who already know he espouses Islam's total conquest of the world, will be unsurprised, while those who think he is a preacher man of peace and togetherness will be unimpressed.
Posted by: Buford Gooch | August 21, 2010 at 10:32 AM
I'm not crossing my fingers for any of this.
Posted by: Kappen | August 21, 2010 at 10:45 AM
Well TM, Emerson doesn't edit, then again if it is in Arabic, one needs a decent translator, one recalls Fisk complaining
that Maronites translated the 9/11 hijackers final statements,I know it's "Wrongway Robert" but you know
Posted by: narciso | August 21, 2010 at 10:46 AM
Speaking directly, the guy's a terrorist symp and there's already enough evidence confirming that; and all the troll denials don't change that.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 21, 2010 at 10:49 AM
Johnny Rotten weighs in on why the punks rule and codgers like Carlos Santana, douches like the Pixies and twats like Elvis Costello should've, like the Who, died before they got old.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 21, 2010 at 10:58 AM
I find all of this quite confusing.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | August 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM
Bret Stephens wa apparently on target.
Surprise.
Posted by: Clarice | August 21, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Joe Strummer, was more on point then we knew
back then
Posted by: narciso | August 21, 2010 at 11:12 AM
I doubt the verification of what Rauf says is what is time consuming, as opposed to the verification of venue, sponsoring organization, audience, etc., etc.
Posted by: daleyrocks | August 21, 2010 at 11:15 AM
I mean, all those jihadis look alike to me, no bigotry intended. Go ahead, investigate away!
Posted by: daleyrocks | August 21, 2010 at 11:17 AM
narc, weren't the members of The Clash all conned by the Sandinistas?
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 21, 2010 at 11:29 AM
OT: Waters dismisses evidence in ethics case as 'staff chatter':
I'm with Maxine. Everyone knows you can't believe the little people. Stick with the truly trustworthy members of Congress if you want the truth.
Posted by: PD | August 21, 2010 at 11:30 AM
I don't care if this idiot is Mr. Rogers. The building of a mosque in that area is dangerous. It will become a center of demonstations, fights, violence and other acts against the general welfare of NYC. The evidence of that certainty is already in. Investigate the hell out of everyone and the salient facts will not change.
Posted by: MarkO | August 21, 2010 at 11:32 AM
If there's one thing Gasoline Maxine's an expert on it's sloppy work. This charm offensive via the media means that Reginald Denny should probably examine some alternate routes if he's still driving a truck when the verdict comes down.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 21, 2010 at 11:34 AM
Waters was a huge supporter of Clinton during impeachment. I knew then she would have a permanent position in the House to reward her backing of that abhorrent behavior by our former prez who has been completely rehabilitated by the Left and their chronic case of amnesia.
Posted by: maryrose | August 21, 2010 at 11:39 AM
CH, how, O how, can you say that? Maxine assured us there is no problem with Fannie. I'm certain that she arrived at this conclusion only though painstaking and assiduous research into the matter. She'd never say any such thing merely for partisan political reasons. Sloppy! Pshaw.
And Barney told us the same thing, which cements the case.
Posted by: PD | August 21, 2010 at 11:40 AM
How long until the first fight?
The NY Post notes that worshipers are already in the building. Facing east.
I would post a link if I had the first idea of how to do it. I can't even work the damned HTML tags. I write with a fountain pen, so there.
Posted by: MarkO | August 21, 2010 at 11:40 AM
I write with a fountain pen
A what?
Posted by: PD | August 21, 2010 at 11:42 AM
21 August 2010
Culver, IN
Am a little late to the recent discussions on the mosque due to travel; a small bit of personal history and thought follows.
In 2002 I lived in el Obied, Sudan (roughly south-central) as part of an international peace monitoring effort in the Nuba Mountains.
El Obied is either the second or third larges city in Sudan after Khartoum. The Catholic Church in El Obied is beautiful and was built by the Comboni Order, in 1961.
In the 1990s immediately across the street from this Church, Saudi money funded the building of a mosque. My interpreter/translator told me how all the residents knew that the mosque was placed specifically in that position as a counter to, of course, the Church. The mosque was known as the “Church Mosque” because everyone knew of the Church there well before.
And, oh yes, lest there be any doubt, the mosque minarets were just that much taller than the Church bell steeple. The significance of what the Saudis were declaring was not lost on anyone.
As to the mosque at Ground Zero, there can be no doubt that this is an effort to claim supremacy over that land. It must be stopped. If completed what they will be saying is, “Islamic warriors destroyed the World Trade Center ‘temple’ of your capitalism. We have built our ‘temple’ (a mosque) on top of those ashes. We are stronger than you. Submit.” Or as Osama Been Laden said in December 2003, “What are we calling you to? We are calling you to complete submission to his will, complete submission to Sharia Law.” This is no different than the Temple Mount.
We may not be waging a religious war; but that they are, there can be no doubt.
Take good care,
Sandy
Posted by: Sandy Daze | August 21, 2010 at 11:43 AM
While we're on the subject of Johnny Rotten, might as well drag this in from left field.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | August 21, 2010 at 11:44 AM
--The building of a mosque in that area is dangerous. It will become a center of demonstations, fights, violence and other acts against the general welfare of NYC.--
Precisely Mark.
The reason the mosque should not have been permitted (in either sense of the word) is public safety.
Posted by: Ignatz | August 21, 2010 at 11:45 AM
Joblessness you can applaud.
Posted by: PD | August 21, 2010 at 11:45 AM
If that was in left field, where is the park?
Posted by: MarkO | August 21, 2010 at 11:49 AM
"They have had these tapes for a month - how long does it take"
Maybe they were waiting for Mosque supporters to commit themselves more deeply to the project. If the claims are true it will be hard on Pelosi, Obama and the Dems.
Posted by: Buck Smith | August 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM
--Johnny Rotten weighs in on why the punks rule and codgers like Carlos Santana, douches like the Pixies and twats like Elvis Costello should've, like the Who, died before they got old.--
I've always found it kind of amusing that "Never Mind the Bollocks", featuring songs such as Anarchy in the UK and God Save the Queen (the fascist regime) but also with anti abortion, anti gay activist and anti union-controlled social democratic Europe (comparing it with east germany), presented a world view vastly more sensible than and well to the right of the Democratic Party platform.
Posted by: Ignatz | August 21, 2010 at 11:58 AM
They're already praying in the Cordoba House.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 21, 2010 at 11:59 AM
Posted by: Extraneus | August 21, 2010 at 12:02 PM
Ooops, didn't see your comment there, MarkO. Glad I could help with the link.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 21, 2010 at 12:03 PM
Those are the moderate muslims in that pic, I assume. I'm glad the jugeared prick has brought us all together with his Presidential demeanour; God/Vishnu/Allah/Satan knows how ugly this could've gotten with that cowboy Booooosh.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 21, 2010 at 12:10 PM
CH says:
--"Speaking directly..."--
LOL
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 21, 2010 at 12:15 PM
No girls allowed?
Posted by: scott | August 21, 2010 at 12:52 PM
They're in the back of the room.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 21, 2010 at 12:58 PM
Maybe this was why the report was created about the Domestic or Home-Grown Terrorists like TEA Party Activists, Militia Members, Soccer Moms, etc. If some sort of an attack happens to the mosque, then they will know just where to look.
Posted by: PDinDetroit | August 21, 2010 at 01:06 PM
Extraneus, thanks for the picture. How sad. Every one of those men are saying 'screw you' to America. Well, Islam has us figured out...just move in & there's nothing anyone will do about it. The headlines will die down, & then they'll be all set. If vandalism occurs in the coming years it will be huge stories about evil Americans vs the poor put-upon Muslims.
I am just sick.
You know what the Dems aught to do in Nov....they should just refuse to step down. What is anyone gonna do about it?
If a MOSQUE can be built at Ground Zero, Islam can do anything it wants. We have lost.
Posted by: Janet | August 21, 2010 at 01:07 PM
We have not lost Janet.
Posted by: Jane | August 21, 2010 at 01:09 PM
I believe the following at LUN is in order. I little humor goes a LONG way.
Posted by: PDinDetroit | August 21, 2010 at 01:15 PM
We may not have lost Jane but I fear that to counter Islamic efforts here in our country our constitution--as we know it--will be destroyed.
Posted by: glasater | August 21, 2010 at 01:17 PM
No we have not. Those people will be hounded by New Yorkers coming in and out of that building, for one thing.
And let's not forget. They managed to slit the throats of a few defenseless flight attendants and pilots. We took over two of their countries and are in the process of reforming them, assuming Obama doesn't blow it.
This mosque gesture isn't doing them any good, now that almost 70% of the American public is starting to recite chapter and verse of Muhammad's commands to his warriors. They were better off when only a few people knew what they were about.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 21, 2010 at 01:19 PM
Religious Freedom is one thing, Religious Extremism is something totally different. I believe our Founding Fathers would have seen this for what it is: An Invasion. They would have acted accordingly.
Posted by: PDinDetroit | August 21, 2010 at 01:21 PM
Love it PDinDetroit! Loved, loved, loved his bombing targets.
Posted by: centralcal | August 21, 2010 at 01:22 PM
A little more humor at LUN.
Posted by: PDinDetroit | August 21, 2010 at 01:22 PM
The news report states that these are over-flow people from a near-by mosque. Weren't we told that there were so few people *period* in this area? I suspect SEIU is carting them in. (Will SEIU begin to unionize both the imams and the terrorists?)
From the New York Post news article:
The Post reported earlier this month that the prayer services were being held despite the building not having a new city certificate of occupancy.
The religious gatherings have been taking place since the building was purchased in May 2009 by the real-estate firm SoHo Properties for $4.85 million. The building's certificate of occupancy expired in 1987 and was only for a retail store.
The Buildings Department has said that the owners are in compliance and that they received temporary permits for a place of assembly, allowing worship.
Posted by: Frau Steingehirn | August 21, 2010 at 01:23 PM
"against her as "staff chatter."
This can easily be avoided by cutting all Congressional staffs. Let them get a laptop and use it, like the people they are allowed to lie to have to do. Why do they need a bunch of servants?
Posted by: Pagar | August 21, 2010 at 01:23 PM
Janet says all that needs to be said about the subject at 01:07 PM. Thank you, Janet.
Posted by: Pagar | August 21, 2010 at 01:27 PM
It bears repeating: "The religious gatherings have been taking place since the building was purchased in May 2009."
Sheesh! News does NOT travel fast.
Posted by: Frau Steingehirn | August 21, 2010 at 01:27 PM
Take heart, Janet. It does look bleak, doesn't it, but it's not over until Joseph Wilson III* sings. In the meantime, we're going to raise hay-ull as best we can and make fun of the SOB's. A lot of people let this happen by not voting. Yesterday I spotted this sign at a grocery store parking lot: "Better an imperfect Republican than a perfect Socialist."
*Ignored Plame leaker Marc Grossman's college buddy at UCSanta Barbara.
Posted by: Frau Steingehirn | August 21, 2010 at 01:47 PM
We haven't lost until the trolls don't have any reason to hector us into submission.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 21, 2010 at 01:54 PM
More apocalypse... What does Mel think of investing in home school suppliers? NEA recommends Saul Alinsky to members.
LUN to AT article.
Posted by: Frau Steingehirn | August 21, 2010 at 02:08 PM
From what I've seen and heard, Emerson has discovered some potentially damaging (to Rauf) audio tapes, not video tapes. My acquaintances in law enforcement have informed me that verifying the authenticity of audio tapes can take a long time, a lot longer than verifying videos. I think Emerson is probably going out of his way to make sure he has his ducks lined up before pouring gasoline on the fire started by Rauf and his Islamist cohorts.
Posted by: Mescalero | August 21, 2010 at 09:04 PM
Last I heard, being a radical Muslim doesn't nullify your First Amendment right to freedom of religion. That said, these "tapes" will turn out to be a big fat nothingburger, except to the rabid Islamophobes who will imagine they hear all kinds of fire and brimstone.
Posted by: giantslor | August 21, 2010 at 09:33 PM
No, but there are certain consequences to the language and actions that one undertakes, as one can be judged by them
Posted by: gozer | August 21, 2010 at 09:37 PM
I'll bet the administrtion and Bloomberg are hoping against hope that the tapes are not what they've been billed to be.
BTW what happened to Shirley sherrod after the rest of her life story made it in print? No lawsuit against Breitbart was there?
Posted by: Clarice | August 21, 2010 at 09:46 PM
Clarice,
I hear Comrade Sherrod will file within 48 business hours.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | August 21, 2010 at 09:55 PM
This I assume is a transcript from her last speech in the LUN
Posted by: gozer | August 21, 2010 at 09:59 PM
If you can get to Montpelier (Orange, VA) on a Saturday, do so. The re-enactor of Dolley Madison is superb. Great actress, sharp as a tack, engaging, vivacious, just finished her dissertation on the argumentation in the Constitutional Convention. She gives two half-hour talks on the Convention and ratification, and you will swear it's Dolley.
I got home and read Federalist 41. N.B. this part near the end:
But those are only the words of the father of the Constitution. So they may be safely ignored.Posted by: Jim Ryan | August 21, 2010 at 10:15 PM
"...these "tapes" will turn out to be a big fat nothingburger, except to the rabid Islamophobes who will imagine they hear all kinds of fire and brimstone."
giantslor -
Actually, I do not need to hear any tapes to know what the Imam and his ilk are all about. I heard and saw all I needed to know about them on 9/11. In case you've forgotten or weren't paying attention on that date, take a look at the YouTube video of the people jumping to their deaths on 9/11 that Janet linked to on another thread.
If that makes me a rabid islamophobe, so be it.
Posted by: Barbara | August 21, 2010 at 10:37 PM
Video at LUN
Posted by: Barbara | August 21, 2010 at 10:38 PM