The Times reports on an interfaith group of religious leaders who deplore the rise in anti-Muslim sentiment. In the final paragraphs we learn that this same group could not agree to endorse the Ground Zero mosque. Oops!
Concern Is Voiced Over Religious Intolerance
By LAURIE GOODSTEINWASHINGTON — Prominent Christian, Jewish and Muslim leaders held an extraordinary “emergency summit” meeting in the capital on Tuesday to denounce what they called “the derision, misinformation and outright bigotry” aimed at American Muslims during the controversy over the proposed Islamic community center near ground zero.
“This is not America,” said Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick, the emeritus Roman Catholic archbishop of Washington, flanked by three dozen clergy members and religious leaders at a packed news conference at the National Press Club. “America was not built on hate.”
No, we built this city on rock and roll. Sorry, back to the conclusion:
They did not take a stand on whether to support the proposed mosque and community center near ground zero in Manhattan, saying, “Persons of conscience have taken different positions on the wisdom of the location of this project, even if the legal right to build on the site appears to be unassailable.”
But some groups at the meeting, like the National Council of Churches, an umbrella group representing 100,000 churches, have come out in support of a mosque near the World Trade Center site, said the Rev. Michael Kinnamon, general secretary of the council.
Wait, "persons of conscience" oppose the mosque, not just intolerant haters? No kidding.
Ah, one can always count on the National Council of Churches. I swear they would cheerfully slit their own throats if told to by just the right people...
Posted by: LTC John | September 08, 2010 at 09:59 AM
No, Colonel, I don't think they would need to be asked, in order to do so
Posted by: narciso | September 08, 2010 at 10:04 AM
These people have demonstrated their irrelevance over the years. Their constituencies are not the faithful in the pews but the reporters who quote them.
Steve Pearlstein has some interesting comments today, although hedged by some of his usual liberal blather:
And remember, as the WSJ recognized yesterday, a big part of the reason we're where we are is because Bushie was here first. First step in recovery is to admit how you wound up on this lousy situation.
Posted by: anduril | September 08, 2010 at 10:15 AM
Any chance BHO resigns and runs for Mayor of Chicago to put his community organizer skills to a better use...
Posted by: BB Key | September 08, 2010 at 10:24 AM
The National Council of Churches makes Rowan Williams seem conservative.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 08, 2010 at 10:48 AM
The statement of the National Council of Churches is LUN. Here is the reasons why they think we ashould support it:
Posted by: Appalled | September 08, 2010 at 11:03 AM
The same reasons they support Fidel, and thought Brezhnev was a misunderstood fellow,
with plenty of potential
Posted by: narciso | September 08, 2010 at 11:09 AM
Who is smarter than a #2 yellow pencil? Not Paul Krugman - sore loser!
Posted by: Jack is Back! | September 08, 2010 at 11:43 AM
Great- The NY F*ckin Times runs a concern troll as a news item, complete with passive tense...
Someone tell the NYT's newsroom that there is a lot more concern being voiced about why such a pathetic operation such as theirs is still publishing.
('Concern Trolling'- LUN)
Posted by: ~FR | September 08, 2010 at 12:55 PM
“America was not built on hate.”
I've been told for years we built it by white folks stealing from Native Americans and Mexicans and enslaving Blacks and Asians
so now we're cool if we let Muslims build this thing right?
Posted by: Hawkins | September 08, 2010 at 01:20 PM
The alternative to that support is to engage in a bigotry that will scar our generation in the same way as bigotry scarred our forebears.
Can they express their hate for the country any more effectively?
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 08, 2010 at 01:26 PM
The statement supported building Cordoba House “as a living monument to mark the tragedy of 9/11 through a community center dedicated to learning, compassion, and respect for all people.”
Hey, wow, I didn't realize that Jews are going to be welcome at the center. That's pretty cool.
They're considered people, right?
Posted by: Extraneus | September 08, 2010 at 01:35 PM
Has the NCC been right about anything in recent history
Posted by: narciso | September 08, 2010 at 01:46 PM
So let's build a monument to LBJ on the site of the My Lai massacre to celebrate the inclusive vision of a Great Society.
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 08, 2010 at 02:08 PM
The William Jefferson Clinton Law Enforcement Memorial in Waco, TX?
Posted by: Rob Crawford | September 08, 2010 at 02:10 PM
The Robert C. Byrd Eternal Burning Cross Memorial?
Posted by: Rob Crawford | September 08, 2010 at 02:13 PM
Hawkins, I learned a long time ago [or thought I did] in school that the 'Mexicans' didn't exist until the Spanish came and enslaved the locals. [Who evidently weren't anywhere near as tough as the Seminoles who seem to have fought the Spanish and the Americans to a standstill, at the least.]
Besides that, for the better part of two centuries there wasn't a hell of a lot between the 'Mexicans' and the Yankees but a bunch of Native Americans [what the hell do they call the 'inhabitants at the time of the Spanish invasion' in Mexico?] and a whole lot of wilderness.
So how the heck do we get the rap for treating 'Mexicans' so badly. Hell, we liberated those poor souls from both the Spanish conquerors and the Catholic Church [as expressed by the Spanish]. They should be grateful.
Posted by: JorgXMcKie | September 08, 2010 at 03:10 PM
Hey, do not look now but Obama is on the news at the moment promising to go after those nasty "outsourcers". He claims that they have been give "tax breaks", which apparently means that they have not got around to taxing them yet, or taxing them enough.
This, along with the absurd claims by the "Church Leaders", which make up the gist of this post, shows just how relentless he and his minions are about politicizing absolutely everything.
It also shows how they refuse to compromise even an nanometer. You would have thought that they would have just caved on the whole GZM business, but they just cannot do it. You would have thought that everyone would see through this nonsense the National Council of Churches is spewing. You woulds have thought that maybe he would see that he might have to actually lower taxes not find new ones. You would think that he would stop constantly scapegoating Americas and actually work on some problems in that "inclusive style" we were all promised. But No he just cannot bring himself to do anything remotely like this
It is instructive to see how their minds work. Never address issues, artfully find a way to "frame" issues to avoid honest exchange, find a scapegoat and then demagogue away.
Will Americans fall for it?
It is doubtful in the case of the GZM that they will, though no doubt enough can be peeled away in order to get that Mosque built. It is enough, after all, to get it built for it is a broad symbol of defeat and surrender by America if it is built. This is the prize, and it is obvious that Obama will sacrifice a great deal for it. The question here is why they feel the need for cover now? They will not get it. Perhaps they are just setting up another talking point. Perhaps there are more operations underway intent on disrupting the religious communities. It is really unclear that the opposition to the GMZ comes particularly from Christians. It would seem a commonsensical assertion out of all save those thoroughly entrapped in elite left-wing ideology or its demimonde. It is very odd that they take this tack. Again, they will just not give an inch, and they have complete contempt for this country and its population. Live and learn: they will fight to the bitter end.
In the case of the outsourcing electioneering, however, it is not clear that the electorate will not swallow it hook line and sinker. If so, how preposterous.
We will get some sort of slide of hand: and aggregate raising of taxes masked by a lowering of some "middle class taxes" covered by some weird "outsourcing tax". This will further cripple the technology sector, of course. They will just move all operations entirely off shore. (oh, and note, they did not say anything about work visas. Bet Bill Gates and the Google crowd would not stand for that.)
The comic thing is that the outsourcers are major dem donors and tend to be democrats. A great many of them are small medium sized business or utilize outsourcers in the context of start ups. Not to mention that almost all the outsourcers are in the BIRCs and as such are countries that Obama and the left would like to see replace America as a world leaders. So to try to do something about the "economy" more class assaults on business, more villianization of businessmen and more structural attacks on capitalism. And that does not address the whole matter of how this would be enforced. (No doubt just a blacket tax on everyone.)
You should have heard him: insufferably smug. His whole manner said "now THIS is GREAT 'framing'. The rubes will eat this RIGHT UP. Try arguing against THIS ONE you GOP scum!"
Pure electioneering BS, and you will hear more of it in the coming days.
Will enough Americans buy this garbage to stop the Nov tidal wave, or at least to lessen it?
Time will tell, but it goes to show just how childish our national political life has become.
Posted by: squaredance | September 08, 2010 at 03:10 PM
Since the Pastor is apparently intent on burning the Koran, this then becomes a valuable opportunity for domestic adherents of the Religion Of Peace to demonstrate that they can live in a tolerant secular society as peaceful members of that tolerant secular society.
Let the nonviolent protests begin.
Posted by: daddy | September 08, 2010 at 03:56 PM
[Who evidently weren't anywhere near as tough as the Seminoles who seem to have fought the Spanish and the Americans to a standstill, at the least.]
Or the tribes that chased the Vikings out of Newfoundland.
Yeah, there's a tendency to treat EVERYTHING done to the natives during colonization of the Americas as being the fault of the USA. We've somehow become the guilt-bearers for acts of Spain, France, Portugal, and the Netherlands -- even when their acts were intended to weaken the British (and, in the end, us).
Posted by: Rob Crawford | September 08, 2010 at 04:11 PM
Rob,
Europe was absolved of its sins by its 20th century embrace of socialism. Of course that doesn't stop less sensible Europeans from continuing to don the hair shirt.
squaredance,
I agree with everything you say in your 3:10.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 08, 2010 at 05:11 PM
The problem with that strategy is that for the past two decades we have allowed our industrial and technological base to deteriorate as talent and capital were grossly misallocated toward other sectors of the economy, even as other countries were able to attract the investment, the technology and the know-how to serve the U.S. and global markets.
For a time, none of this seemed to matter because we were consuming so much that we were able to support job creation at home as well as overseas. But now that the debt-fueled consumption binge is over, we find that we don't have the companies, the workers or the competitive products to replace the stuff we now import or expand our share of export markets. Even when we do, our companies are disadvantaged by an overvalued currency or unfair trading practices.
Posted by: Guild Wars 2 gold | September 09, 2010 at 02:37 AM
I believe there are a number of parallel lead water supply pipes ( not the Water Companies property).
Posted by: Pure Hoodia | September 09, 2010 at 07:05 AM
Guild Wars:
".....as talent and capital were grossly misallocated toward other sectors of the economy....."
Misallocated? At whose disposal, precisely, do you see such resources? Your assertion sounds a lot like the predicate for central planning, no?
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 09, 2010 at 09:49 AM
JMH -- if GW means misallocated towards government employment, global warming scams, going to college and majoring in something-studies rather than vo-tech and learning welding, etc., then that's spot-on.
Posted by: cathyf | September 09, 2010 at 10:21 AM