As the uninformed electorate understands the health bill it will become more popular, or so Barack Obama explained. Of course, all he has is the bully pulpit of the White House and the legacy media in his pocket, so he can't compete with Sarah's Facebook pages.
Meanwhile, the Dem candidate for the Senate seat in West Virginia wants to repeal "the things that are bad" in the health care bill.
Maybe the bill's popularity will increase after the election.
Because that has worked so well with the Stimulus Bill.
Posted by: Joan of Argghh! | September 27, 2010 at 03:30 PM
So Manchin wants to repeal the things in ObamaCare that make you go "Hmmmmmm". I've got the perfect song for the partial repeal movement. See LUN.
Now I've got to find a song for the complete repeal movement.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | September 27, 2010 at 03:35 PM
Stumblebum Odumbass never provided any evidence that he understood what was in the bill during all the shill sessions for it. He continually came off as a seventh grader that hadn't done his homework.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 27, 2010 at 03:36 PM
WE THE EDITORS are cognizant of our role as the intellectual and moral leaders of West Virginia. Never is that role more important than when we extend our assistance to the electorate by providing guidance in comparing candidates for high office. Fortunately, the leading candidate in the biggest race in the state, the Democratic candidate for Senate, has made our job easy by his bold decision to favor "repealing the things that are bad". This statesmanlike stance draws a clear contrast to the Republican, who presumably wants to repeal things that are good.
To cut through the flowery language of intellectuals for the benefit of our readers, we must point out that "repeal" basically means "stop". So the Democrat wants to stop things that are bad. If you, dear voter, want to continue bad things, we suppose you can vote for some other candidate; but our considered opinion is that the Democrat and his anti-bad, pro-good philosophy will, must, and should carry the day.
Posted by: bgates | September 27, 2010 at 03:50 PM
Forgot to mention that at the wedding last week, I found out my very Lib big Govt Obama supporting very close relative has been let go by the huge Hospital where said relative worked for years as a big Bureaucratic Administrator who frequently went to Capitol Hill for seminars, fund raising etc.
The bloom was off the rose. Was very disappointed with Obama and did not wish to discuss it, which I deferred to, wishing to maintain good relations etc. Now said relative is simply grasping at straws pondering what to do as a career change. Said relative was completely disgusted and disenchanted with the Health Care Industry and wanted to get away from it.
To me the good thing is that said relative has now been introduced to the reality of the Obama agenda. But even better in my view, is that now no longer will relative be surrounded each day at work with folks pretending to be exactly like-minded about the wonders of Obama. For the first time in as long as I can remember, that pressure to conform to PC leftist thought in order to get along with everybody else around you will no longer apply.
Said relative will now have the opportunity to view things outside of such mental and social pressures. Granted the laptop website was home paged to CNN, as was the TV in the apartment, but at least there is a chance for enlightenment. I'm cautiously optimistic.
Posted by: daddy the "Extremist" | September 27, 2010 at 03:56 PM
In other news (Via Drudge):
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/09/27/130155161/lawyer-involved-in-prosecution-of-sen-ted-stevens-commits-suicide?ft=1&f=1001>Lawyer Involved In Prosecution Of Sen. Ted Stevens Commits Suicide
Curiouser and curiouser...
The investigation had been going on for more than a year and a report by the Special Prosecutor is expected in a few weeks. Marsh's lawyer, Bob Luskin, says he thought his client would not be charged. But apparently the strain of the investigation was just too much.
Posted by: Ranger | September 27, 2010 at 04:16 PM
I'd never seen this (see below) before, but it's interesting and confirms what I thought at the time of the Iraq invasion: that this was more about global strategy than about Saddam Hussein. What "this" is is a report put out by PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY in September, 2000, called: REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES, Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century. The key paragraph is:
Now obviously the writers of the report could not have foreseen the events of 9/11, however, it seems likely that for them those events represented a crisis that should not be allowed to go to waste. To paraphrase the report itself, the events of 9/11 represented "the immediate justification" for a redeployment of of US forces in line with the report's thinking. The project participants were:
Roger Barnett
U.S. Naval War College
Alvin Bernstein
National Defense University
Stephen Cambone
National Defense University
Eliot Cohen
Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University
Devon Gaffney Cross
Donors' Forum for International Affairs
Thomas Donnelly
Project for the New American Century
David Epstein
Office of Secretary of Defense, Net Assessment
David Fautua
Lt. Col., U.S. Army
Dan Goure
Center for Strategic and International Studies
Donald Kagan
Yale University
Fred Kagan
U. S. Military Academy at West Point
Robert Kagan
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Robert Killebrew
Col., USA (Ret.)
William Kristol
The Weekly Standard
Mark Lagon
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
James Lasswell
GAMA Corporation
I. Lewis Libby
Dechert Price & Rhoads
Robert Martinage
Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment
Phil Meilinger
U.S. Naval War College
Mackubin Owens
U.S. Naval War College
Steve Rosen
Harvard University
Gary Schmitt
Project for the New American Century
Abram Shulsky
The RAND Corporation
Michael Vickers
Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment
Barry Watts
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Paul Wolfowitz
Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University
Dov Zakheim
System Planning Corporation
Those principally in charge of the project were:
DONALD KAGAN GARY SCHMITT
Project Co-Chairmen
THOMAS DONNELLY
Principal Author
Posted by: anduril | September 27, 2010 at 04:18 PM
Androol
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | September 27, 2010 at 04:56 PM
So, who amongst Taranto's 'helpers' is dissing Clarice? Whoever it was, they should knock it off. After all, I would wager that the question is being asked by at least one current American Secretary of State.
Posted by: Walter | September 27, 2010 at 05:14 PM
T. Collins:
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | September 27, 2010 at 05:15 PM
Oh, my, Walter. I confess I was uncertain about the headline, but honestly, is it so unthinkable with Obama on the downward slide?
Posted by: Clarice | September 27, 2010 at 05:23 PM
How many are "a few weeks"? Before or after the election? And who is the special prosecutor?
Posted by: Jane | September 27, 2010 at 05:26 PM
Sidebar to anduril:
I skip right over your cut-n-paste comments. I can't be the only one nor the first to say this.
Seriously, dude, they carry as much interest as watching a primate's auto-erotic stimulation; which is to say none.
Posted by: lyle | September 27, 2010 at 05:40 PM
The public is just to dumb to understand how we can lower our health care costs by spending an extra $2.5 trillion on health care. That's a shame because that plan harmonizes so well with Obama's plans to spend our way to prosperity and to bow and apologize our way to world peace.
Posted by: MikeS | September 27, 2010 at 05:45 PM
Seriously, dude, since you invented the simile and presented it to the world here, it probably holds interest for you. U R weird.
Posted by: anduril | September 27, 2010 at 05:46 PM
Clarice,
I would expect that it would drive up traffic--and be a surprise to many of the people clicking through expecting praise for the H-woman.
Not so long ago I vehemently maintained she was too radical for the office. At this point, it seems fair to concede that there were worse choices in the field.
Posted by: Walter | September 27, 2010 at 05:48 PM
lyle,
Seriously, dude, they carry as much interest as watching a primate's auto-erotic stimulation; which is to say none.
As a member of an underrepresented simian affinity group, I'm offended by your clear lack of sensitivity toward primate activists deeply concerned with self-stimulation issues.
Time for you to attend a Jean Sibelius Happy Camp to get your attitude adjusted.
Posted by: MarkJ | September 27, 2010 at 06:00 PM
Hey! Don't drag the great composer into a discussion of masturbating monkeys or Anduril (is there a difference?).
Posted by: DrJ | September 27, 2010 at 06:07 PM
Mark meant Kathleen, not Jean, and this Sibelius composes odes to authority.
============
Posted by: The first one raising rates around here gets it in the you know where. | September 27, 2010 at 06:47 PM
Her last name is Sebelius, not Sibelius.
Posted by: DrJ | September 27, 2010 at 06:50 PM
Curiouser and curiouser...
You know, when I saw that, I have to admit I wondered if he'd, say, committed suicide with three rounds to the back of the head.
But more seriously, I can easily imagine someone who got too committed to a conviction, realizes the jig is up, and couldn't face disgrace and disbarment.
Or even couldn't face the thought of paying for his defense.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 27, 2010 at 06:54 PM
I'm glad to have my spelling adjusted. I'm glad you left my attitude alone.
=============
Posted by: How much is that doggy in the window? | September 27, 2010 at 06:55 PM
As a member of an underrepresented simian affinity group, I'm offended by your clear lack of sensitivity toward primate activists deeply concerned with self-stimulation issues.
So much for the "monkeying around" jokes.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 27, 2010 at 06:55 PM
This is not the right thread but it's too good not to link. LUN
Now I'm going to finish crying and enjoy the family.
It's about how different First and former families treat our military.
Posted by: rse | September 27, 2010 at 06:59 PM
Here's the LUN.
Time for a kleenex.
Posted by: rse | September 27, 2010 at 07:00 PM
Yes, rse's link is a really good one.
Posted by: centralcal | September 27, 2010 at 07:20 PM
Nobody's gonna touch your attitude, Kim, they'll have to answer to the rest of us. And adjusting spelling is a very slippery slope around here !
:-)
Posted by: Old Lurker | September 27, 2010 at 07:25 PM
If anything, we should redouble efforts --- make that ass whupping into a real Sodom and Gomorrah affair complete with Charlton Heston's voice from heaven.
Posted by: Neo | September 27, 2010 at 07:40 PM
What's wrong with monkeying around ?
Posted by: Haversham Brothers | September 27, 2010 at 07:42 PM
Am I the only one that doesn't quite get Hillbuzz?
They're always talking about how great Bush is compared to the jerk Barry and yet their site is ostensibly about promoting just as big a jerk in Hillary.
There's always a bit of a through the looking glass feel to the place IMO.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 27, 2010 at 07:46 PM
And adjusting spelling is a very slippery slope around here !
Agreed, OL, but to confuse Jean Sibelius and Kathleen Sebelius is just too much for me. I adore the former -- the last movement of his second symphony is practically orgasmic. I'm not particularly fond of the latter, though her department does pay my bills.
Posted by: DrJ | September 27, 2010 at 07:47 PM
I find the whole Ted Stevens saga very, very sad. Sure wish that plane hadn't gone down.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 27, 2010 at 08:02 PM
It's on.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 27, 2010 at 08:22 PM
Two good points, DrJ!
Posted by: Old Lurker | September 27, 2010 at 08:23 PM
Answer to Ignatz-- no you are not the only one who doesn't get Hillbuzz.
Posted by: peter | September 27, 2010 at 08:46 PM
Porchlight ... off topic but dying to know ... did your parents have a hand in the building and design of the PJ house, or did they buy the house finished?
Posted by: Chubby | September 27, 2010 at 08:47 PM
Nice field goal, not.
Posted by: PD | September 27, 2010 at 08:50 PM
Ever more popular or this could be a clue.
Fraud suspected as dead city retirees continue to collect pension checks.
Didn't say rather they were continuing to vote.
Posted by: Pagar | September 27, 2010 at 08:52 PM
I'm sure the people cashing those checks are doing so by mistake.
Posted by: PD | September 27, 2010 at 08:59 PM
Iggy, re: Hillbuzz; remember we were allies with Stalin in WW2. Although for FDR and especially POS Henry Wallace that wasn't that big a stretch.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 27, 2010 at 08:59 PM
Ignatz, just an idea, but maybe Hillbuzz formed around the same time Rush was pushing folks to vote for Hillary in the primaries? kind of a faux Hillary love site?
Posted by: Chubby | September 27, 2010 at 09:01 PM
hmmmm, I wonder if Archie is a Democrat or Republican. I'm sure Veronica is a limousine liberal.
Posted by: Chubby | September 27, 2010 at 09:02 PM
Gallup to Dems - Make Your Peace
The article must be read from beginning to end and the charts studied with a modicum of attention in order to savor the full flavor. Voter enthusiasm, President's job approval, Congressional approval rating and satisfaction with 'the way things are going' are all at significantly (statistically speaking) lower levels than they were when the Dems lost 53 seats.
Gallup has set the table for their change to LVs next week. I wonder if they will choose Abandonate Ogni Speranza as the title?
Posted by: Rick Ballard | September 27, 2010 at 09:10 PM
Rick, I somehow think that rallies designed for the sole purpose of dissing ordinary God--loving Americans, calling them violent extremists and so on, isn't going to help the Dems.
Posted by: Chubby | September 27, 2010 at 09:15 PM
Packers might as well pass every down. Sure ain't got no run game.
I suppose the rest of you are watching Bristol Palin on Dancing with the Stars?
Posted by: PD | September 27, 2010 at 09:15 PM
Chubby,
No, they bought it in 2002 from a developer who had purchased it from the second family to own it since it was built. It's very boxy and square, as you might imagine - but it was built for a family and is surprisingly comfortable as a family home. Although the big glass windows make for a nice view, I actually prefer it at night, with the lights lit. It has tons of recessed lighting - goodness knows what it will look like when all those warm incandescents have to be replaced with CFLs. My dad will probably like the electric bill a lot better though. ;)
Posted by: Porchlight | September 27, 2010 at 09:16 PM
Obama having trouble with turnout for tomorrow's rally in Madison
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,601564,00.html
Posted by: Clarice | September 27, 2010 at 09:33 PM
Clarice, should I forego the sock-sorting and go help him out?
Posted by: PD | September 27, 2010 at 09:35 PM
Advice for Obama:
Luke 14:23 And the lord said unto the servant, Go out into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in, that my house may be filled.
Posted by: PD | September 27, 2010 at 09:36 PM
HEH,pd. How does he expect kids to come sit there to and from classes with no book bags, no pcs and no bottles of water or food?
Posted by: Clarice | September 27, 2010 at 09:39 PM
Are their games, usually that lopsided.
Posted by: narciso | September 27, 2010 at 09:43 PM
Anduril, that is very old, and I'm pretty sure you missed some of the authors. Could you please go back and re-copy the entire list and then paste that into a comment.
I mean, if I don't get the entire list, I'm not that interested.
P.S. How much does it cost to subscribe to your website/journal/newsletter/twitter? I'm willing to go several hundred dollars for access to such bleeding edge research.
[Is the sarcasm tag really necessary?
Posted by: jorgxmckie | September 27, 2010 at 09:47 PM
PD-
Had to give up the tix for tonight.
This is ugly (my side). Pack "O" looks well prepped.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 27, 2010 at 09:49 PM
Mel, yeah, I'm surprised the offense is doing so well. Special teams still stinks, so the Bears should try for all their scores on kickoffs and unts.
narciso, it'd be more even if both teams had a quarterback.
Posted by: PD | September 27, 2010 at 09:52 PM
Wow, if Barry can't fill a rally in Madison, things are looking better than I thought.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 27, 2010 at 09:53 PM
*p*unts.
Thought I'd better clarify that so no one filled in the wrong letter.
Turns out *Sarah* Palin's on Dancing, too.
Posted by: PD | September 27, 2010 at 09:53 PM
What I want to do is just to go speak to young people directly and remind them of what I always said during the campaign, which was that hope's just a word unless we have 60 or more votes in the Senate; that change is always hard in this country except when I can just sign an executive order, like when I closed Gitmo, ended Don't ask, don't tell, and booted all the lobbyists from the White House; that we can't very well have a new tone in Washington when Republican teabaggers say no to everything I say and lie and distort my healthcare reform.
Posted by: I Won | September 27, 2010 at 09:54 PM
Bears not goin' away!
Posted by: PD | September 27, 2010 at 09:57 PM
Hey, Melinda, the chatter this morning about Samuel Insull made me recommend this free market walking tour of the Chicago Loop. Not sure you saw it...
Posted by: cathyf | September 27, 2010 at 09:58 PM
cathy-
I do those on any walk through the City. My favorites that I show off are The Monadnock Building, the largest masonry structure in the world (meaning ALL brick), and The Marquette Building, the other best lobby in the city, after The Rookery, especially with the restored 1905 Frank Lloyd Wright atrium.
I can't do it justice, and yes, I'm an architecture geek.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 27, 2010 at 10:12 PM
What about the opera house throne, facing west with it's back to NYC?
Posted by: Old Lurker | September 27, 2010 at 10:17 PM
Looks like I spoke too soon
Posted by: narciso | September 27, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 27, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Lets see.. Health care passed and all is well? - Just got my small companies new health care contract for the next 12 months. For our little company of 4 people the BCBS cost went up 21%. It will be pure luck if we can continue to afford any health care once the Obama version goes into play. The whole thing (Obamacare) was a sick joke. Nothing was done to reduce costs - which has been the biggest problem for those you have health care now - too much was owed to the Lawyers by Obama.
Posted by: LeeS | September 27, 2010 at 10:19 PM
The Monadnock was the world's first "skyscraper" you know!
Did you read through the tour? It's got lots of odd esoteric Chicago history.
Posted by: cathyf | September 27, 2010 at 10:20 PM
Posted by: cathyf | September 27, 2010 at 10:22 PM
OL-
Funny you should mention that, it was built by Samuel Insull.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 27, 2010 at 10:23 PM
Ha
Posted by: Old Lurker | September 27, 2010 at 10:31 PM
Thought so Mel.
Posted by: Old Lurker | September 27, 2010 at 10:34 PM
cathy-
I know more of that history than the tour implies to tout, but they might deliver it on the tour. No sense in giving it all away on a web site.
I work across the street from the oldest timber framed structure left in the City limits, The Green Door Tavern, purportedly, a one time Capone establishment.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 27, 2010 at 10:38 PM
Was that the one I saw on a history channel that had an escape hatch behind the bar down through the basement and out a tunnel so Capone could escape two blocks away?
Posted by: Old Lurker | September 27, 2010 at 10:47 PM
That was probably The Lexington Hotel, if there weren't double exits from the other spots, I would be shocked.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 27, 2010 at 10:53 PM
OK-
I enjoyed the Hester punt return for six.
64 punts without one.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 27, 2010 at 10:59 PM
Pack special teams come through again. Ugh.
Posted by: PD | September 27, 2010 at 11:00 PM
And I fade.
G'night all.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 27, 2010 at 11:00 PM
Wow, Aaron Rodgers really has big feet. If he had just one leg, he could be a dufflepud.
Posted by: PD | September 27, 2010 at 11:06 PM
Congrats, Mel. Bears took it away from the Pack.
Posted by: PD | September 27, 2010 at 11:44 PM
Rick Lazio kindly withdrew from the Conservative ticket for NY governor, aiding Paladino's chances against Cuomo. Of course he would not endorse Paladino and dissed him (though not as much as he dissed Cuomo) in his news conference. Another poor loser, but not as bad as Murcowsky or Castle.
Posted by: jimmyk | September 28, 2010 at 12:09 AM
Hey, everyone! I invented similes! Bet you didn't know that, you fey JOMers.
Entre nous: I had a hand in the early stages of metaphors and analogies. Can't claim pure ownership, sadly.
Posted by: lyle | September 28, 2010 at 12:26 AM
"I suppose the rest of you are watching Bristol Palin on Dancing with the Stars?"
No, but always eager to help bash the Palin's, the ADN published photo's of Bristol's dance partner at Anchorage airport ">http://www.adn.com/2010/09/24/1469716/bristols-dancing-partner-strips.html"> in his underpants.
Posted by: daddy the "Extremist" | September 28, 2010 at 01:59 AM
This is fairly creepy.
Lisa Murcowskee is pondering using ads supporting her that were ">http://www.adn.com/2010/09/27/1473768/murkowski-campaign-might-use-stevens.html"> recorded by the late Senator Stevens back before she lost the Republican Primary. Don't know why she didn't use them previously, but now her campaign spokesman, who can obviously seance with the dear departed, is telling us:
"I know what Sen. Stevens would tell me," said [Murkowski spokesman Steve] Wackowski. "He would say, ‘Damn it, if I spent all that time with you taping this commercial, you'd better use it."
My suggestion was that if she needs an ad by an ex-Alaskan Republican Senator endorsing her, why not get her dad, Frank Mercowskee, to cut her one, since he gave her the Senate seat in the first place, plus he's still alive! If he thinks its such a great idea to disrespect the electorate like his daughter obviously does then he ought to step up and do an ad saying so. So far he has kept quiet. I am hoping it is because he still has some personal integrity, as opposed to simply staying mum because he knows his name is mud for originally appointing her, and endorsing her now for "The Mercowskee Seat" would be the final nail in her campaign coffin.
Posted by: daddy the "Extremist" | September 28, 2010 at 03:16 AM
Clarice,
Since I believe you were tracking this Bruce Weyhrauch case:
">http://www.adn.com/2010/09/27/1474585/judges-toss-evidence-former-legislators.html"> Judges toss evidence in former legislator's case
SERVICES: Prosecutors will have harder time proving fraud.
"Following the lead of the U.S. Supreme Court, a panel of judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has thrown out evidence that federal prosecutors hoped would prove that former Rep. Bruce Weyhrauch violated his duty to Alaskans."
Posted by: daddy the "Extremist" | September 28, 2010 at 04:25 AM
Well the founders of Rockstar are Scottish, so i think they will do a GTA in the future in the UK, i say future because GTA is one of those games where you could make 100 and they still would be fresh so i can see the franchise going on for many years.
Ultra Growth
Posted by: Ultra Growth | September 28, 2010 at 04:52 AM
Just some stories I thought I'd post before they disappear down the memory hole:
1) ">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39382469/ns/technology_and_science-science/"> Glacier ice loss less than once thought, study suggests. "Using new methods, the study researchers calculated new estimates of ice loss in Greenland and Antarctica that are significantly smaller than previous estimates."
2) ">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/windpower/8028328/Britains-offshore-windpower-costs-twice-as-much-as-coal-and-gas-generated-electricity.html"> Off shore wind farms cost twice as much to produce electricity as gas and coal powered stations and will need subsidies for at least 20 years, a major report warns.
Posted by: daddy the "Extremist" | September 28, 2010 at 06:37 AM
I wonder if we could get Ultra Growth hooked up with Acai Berry if that might make Prada Bags jealous?
Posted by: daddy the "Extremist" | September 28, 2010 at 06:45 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/26/AR2010092603356.html>Oh dear Lord:
More personalized?
If in 2008 Obama ran a carefully choreographed (and highly selective) biography campaign,now they're taking it . . . micro.
This all ends with Obama sharing a story of walking by Malia's room one night and overhearing her tearful prayer for unity,doesn't it?
Posted by: hit and run | September 28, 2010 at 07:32 AM
He's toast.
Posted by: Jane (sit on the couch or save your country) | September 28, 2010 at 07:49 AM
"Offshore wind farms cost"
According to a commenter at this EU Referendum Article the owner of the windfarm is:
"by Atomic Hairdryer » Sun Sep 26, 2010 2:04 pm
For the Kent windfarm, tracing the owner and the interest is easy. Vattenfall's wholly owned by the Swedish government. We're helping subsidise their energy costs and taxpayers."
Posted by: Pagar | September 28, 2010 at 07:49 AM
It's the Buck Up Tour at Drudge today.
"All those who really believe in what we've been doing, should get out and vote. No excuses."
[Just a paraphrase, since all of his statements seem to assume that everyone who voted for him was a socialist, knew he was just kidding with the moderate rhetoric, and should be delighted with the "progress" toward Utopia.]
Pathetic.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 28, 2010 at 08:16 AM
"All those who really believe in what we've been doing, should get out and vote. No excuses."
Well that should be good for dropping Dem turnout other 20 points.
Posted by: Rollie J | September 28, 2010 at 08:28 AM
Looks like Dem turnout is dropping already:
"Democratic Party Chairman Timothy Kaine says he sees no slight in Wisconsin Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold skipping a campaign rally tonight where President Barack Obama is appearing on his behalf."
Drudge/AP (LUN)
Posted by: Rollie J | September 28, 2010 at 08:30 AM
Thomas Sowell has a good one up at RCP. LUN. He wrote this before yesterday's announcement of new rules to track all money leaving the US, and without mentioning the new rules for 1099's from everyone about everyone, and also without wondering if the internet tapping news yesterday somehow fits into this picture. The UK went down this "Lock all the doors and windows then tax it all" approach in the 60's and 70's, and that was the final nail in the coffin of that empire. When Thatcher came along in the 80's and opened things back up, the UK was a shell of its former self. And rich Brits got around it all anyway, such being the history of the world.
Posted by: Old Lurker | September 28, 2010 at 08:34 AM
Is Obama wearing cardigan sweaters yet and carrying his own (empty) suitcase? Can he spell "malaise"? Just wondering where we are on the path.
Posted by: Old Lurker | September 28, 2010 at 08:36 AM
Thank, Ext.
Posted by: Clarice | September 28, 2010 at 08:45 AM
RollieJ,
Good catch. I can't believe AP even noted that Feingold wasn't going to be there.
Just curious, what does a candidate do with his time in these situations? Does he go do another campaign event, or does he sit home and twiddle his thumbs until it's over?
Posted by: Porchlight | September 28, 2010 at 08:48 AM
Smoot Hawley and history leaves clues. Our government is not listening.
When goods do not cross borders, soldiers will.
Frederic Bastiat
Posted by: Army of Davids | September 28, 2010 at 09:12 AM
OL-
I just ordered Claire Berlinski's There is No Alternative:Why Margaret Thatcher Matters" yesterday.
Have you read it?
LUN is the interview with her by Peter Robinson.
Posted by: rse | September 28, 2010 at 09:16 AM
Have not, rse, but will on your suggestion. Thanks.
Posted by: Old Lurker | September 28, 2010 at 09:20 AM
oh goody, Daddy, your use of the term "memory hole" gives me a perfect opening to post this impressive video that I saw yesterday for the first time (tho' it's been around a while)
Should government stop dumping money into a giant hole?
Posted by: Chubby | September 28, 2010 at 09:22 AM
((When goods do not cross borders, soldiers will.
Frederic Bastiat ))
Higher taxes, higher cost of living, high unemployment rate, recession and protectionism. Wow, what a totally winning formula!
Posted by: Chubby | September 28, 2010 at 09:25 AM