Ed's pretty sharp, but why is he blind to the effect of the Swifties on the public's perception of media bias. Doesn't he know anything about them?
===============
AoD, Jeffrey Folks, in the AT article referenced in the other thread, points out that China is now leasing tar sands in Alberta, and, with many other nations, now nailing down fossil fuel leases all over the world. Us, we're throttling our domestic energy industry.
====================
Bet China doesn't think the Number 1 priority of federal ed spending is to foster diversity.
Bet China doesn't see math and science as subjects that need to be redesigned to be inclusive for all minorities, both genders, and despite real learning differences.
I really enjoyed your links to Steve McIntyre getting the nod as 1 of the 50 people on the planet who matter.
I think the best write up of that is by James Delingpole at the UK Telegraph, since he goes after the reviewer who dumps on Steve by basically saying that the truth he has brought to the Climate Debate might be negative.
Bet China doesn't see math and science as subjects that need to be redesigned to be inclusive for all minorities, both genders, and despite real learning differences.
You forgot the *real* aim of all education in all subjects: Social Justice (trademark - Billy the Bomber Ayers)
Yeah, Daddy, Delingpole is a gas. The comment stream at the New Statesman was amazing, something like 50-1 in favor of Steve, at a leftist rag.
=========
Gloria Alred, probably working with the Brown campaign, charges that Med Whitman abused her former maid. Unfortunately for her, Meg kept meticulous notes which showed that she paid the woman $23/hr wages after the woman had lied to Meg and the employment agency, claiming she was a lawful permanent resident and providing as proof (which it thn as) a social security card and driver's license. Meg said that 9 years later when she found out about the fraud, she fired the woman.
I predict this will hurt Brown, not Whitman.
I hope it means we won't have to see the odious Alred any more.
That snotty Science reviewer reminded me of something from the Darwin debates of 1860. Don't want to open up that can of worms, but there's a famous contemporaneous comment by the Bishop of Worchester's wife about it: "Descended from monkeys? Let us hope that it is not true. But if it is true, let us hope that it not become widely known."
What I find funny about this is that this is now the Brit Scientific Community doing the "Oh my Gawd, lets hope Steve McCintyre's fact are not true. But if they are true, lets hope nobody finds out about them."
It's the exact reversal of the situation, and that the Scientific community over there doesn't see that is what kills me.
For all practical purposes the so called media is really just leftist propaganda readers. Calling them media members is a insult to the few that really attempt to inform the public with just the facts.
Just yesterday, the Royal Society outlined its new declaration on climate and it finds much more uncertainty than previously. L!ink U!nder N!ame for Antnee's blog with a thread and comments.
============
It's 43 members. The RS still says that there is 'strong evidence' that Man has raised the temperatures, but the blogs are all gleefully crying 'Show us the strong evidence'.
============
"Many journalists like to think of themselves as writing the "first draft of history". But more often, their work is an intellectual cul-de-sac, so wrong and so misinformed that it provides only markers as to the fact that something happened - the actual facts having to be gleaned from other sources"
All I know is what
I read on the blogs and write.
See with my own eyes.
===========
Posted by: We are cooling, folks; even kimbots know. | September 29, 2010 at 10:19 AM
Ed's pretty sharp, but why is he blind to the effect of the Swifties on the public's perception of media bias. Doesn't he know anything about them?
===============
Posted by: Don't answer that; it's a joke, Son. | September 29, 2010 at 10:27 AM
Kim-
Just finished reading the new NOAA report on its education program and priorities.
You should take a look at it.
Felt like I was reading an indoctrination program straight out of the Soviet.
Posted by: rse | September 29, 2010 at 10:32 AM
Politicians on both sides of the isle are eager to blame the Chinese for our problems.
Smoot Hawley type protectionism is a stupid path that will cost still more jobs.
It's the stupid economic policies, stupid.
Posted by: Army of Davids | September 29, 2010 at 10:38 AM
Think how bad it would be if we hadn't had ClimateGate and CopenChaos. Chaco's got a nice series going over at PJM.
================
Posted by: Oh the times they be a hard rain gonna fall. | September 29, 2010 at 10:38 AM
LUN is the link to NOAA report with a Capitol Hill hearing scheduled for Oct 6.
Two primary goals:
1) Advance the environmental literacy of the nation and influence stewardship behaviors.
2) Promote a Diverse workforce in oceanic, coastal, Great Lakes, atmospheric, and climate sciences.
How fortuitous national science standards are now being drafted.
How good to have a national media compliant in fostering ignorance and misinformation.
Posted by: rse | September 29, 2010 at 10:40 AM
AoD, Jeffrey Folks, in the AT article referenced in the other thread, points out that China is now leasing tar sands in Alberta, and, with many other nations, now nailing down fossil fuel leases all over the world. Us, we're throttling our domestic energy industry.
====================
Posted by: And for nuttin'. CO2 has a climatic effect, but we can't find it yet. | September 29, 2010 at 10:44 AM
Chaco's series is in the Washington Examiner, too. He's got part 3 of the series up today, all about Big Green.
================
Posted by: I think I'm gonna have to read it. | September 29, 2010 at 10:52 AM
I like the hart Ed uses which shows the tipping point was Rathergate.
Posted by: Clarice | September 29, 2010 at 10:59 AM
Bet China doesn't think the Number 1 priority of federal ed spending is to foster diversity.
Bet China doesn't see math and science as subjects that need to be redesigned to be inclusive for all minorities, both genders, and despite real learning differences.
Posted by: rse | September 29, 2010 at 11:22 AM
Priority #1 defeating all liberals holding office anywhere.
Priority #2 driving MFM to bankruptcy.
Posted by: centralcal | September 29, 2010 at 11:44 AM
Kim,
I really enjoyed your links to Steve McIntyre getting the nod as 1 of the 50 people on the planet who matter.
I think the best write up of that is by James Delingpole at the UK Telegraph, since he goes after the reviewer who dumps on Steve by basically saying that the truth he has brought to the Climate Debate might be negative.
Anyhow, here's that ">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100055793/steve-mcintyre-total-bloody-hero/"> Delingpole story which is worth a read if anyone hasn't sen it yet.
Posted by: daddy the "Extremist" | September 29, 2010 at 01:36 PM
Bet China doesn't see math and science as subjects that need to be redesigned to be inclusive for all minorities, both genders, and despite real learning differences.
You forgot the *real* aim of all education in all subjects: Social Justice (trademark - Billy the Bomber Ayers)
Posted by: Frau Argwohn | September 29, 2010 at 01:52 PM
Yeah, Daddy, Delingpole is a gas. The comment stream at the New Statesman was amazing, something like 50-1 in favor of Steve, at a leftist rag.
=========
Posted by: The one he wrote about the Queen seeking low income energy assistance for her palace was a keeper. | September 29, 2010 at 02:08 PM
Gloria Alred, probably working with the Brown campaign, charges that Med Whitman abused her former maid. Unfortunately for her, Meg kept meticulous notes which showed that she paid the woman $23/hr wages after the woman had lied to Meg and the employment agency, claiming she was a lawful permanent resident and providing as proof (which it thn as) a social security card and driver's license. Meg said that 9 years later when she found out about the fraud, she fired the woman.
I predict this will hurt Brown, not Whitman.
I hope it means we won't have to see the odious Alred any more.
Posted by: Clarice | September 29, 2010 at 03:37 PM
Kim,
That snotty Science reviewer reminded me of something from the Darwin debates of 1860. Don't want to open up that can of worms, but there's a famous contemporaneous comment by the Bishop of Worchester's wife about it: "Descended from monkeys? Let us hope that it is not true. But if it is true, let us hope that it not become widely known."
What I find funny about this is that this is now the Brit Scientific Community doing the "Oh my Gawd, lets hope Steve McCintyre's fact are not true. But if they are true, lets hope nobody finds out about them."
It's the exact reversal of the situation, and that the Scientific community over there doesn't see that is what kills me.
Posted by: daddy the "Extremist" | September 29, 2010 at 05:00 PM
Science communities are catching on; ClimateGate revealed how everyone had been fooled.
================
Posted by: The climate science community, though, has mostly circled wagons. | September 29, 2010 at 07:56 PM
For all practical purposes the so called media is really just leftist propaganda readers. Calling them media members is a insult to the few that really attempt to inform the public with just the facts.
Posted by: Pagar | September 29, 2010 at 09:20 PM
Just yesterday, the Royal Society outlined its new declaration on climate and it finds much more uncertainty than previously. L!ink U!nder N!ame for Antnee's blog with a thread and comments.
============
Posted by: Forty one members revolted and demanded changes. | September 30, 2010 at 12:45 AM
It's 43 members. The RS still says that there is 'strong evidence' that Man has raised the temperatures, but the blogs are all gleefully crying 'Show us the strong evidence'.
============
Posted by: Google Livingston and Penn if you haven't yet. | September 30, 2010 at 07:44 AM
Great News, Kim!
Here's a view of the EU Referendum on "on being prepared".
"Many journalists like to think of themselves as writing the "first draft of history". But more often, their work is an intellectual cul-de-sac, so wrong and so misinformed that it provides only markers as to the fact that something happened - the actual facts having to be gleaned from other sources"
Posted by: pagar | September 30, 2010 at 07:49 AM
Pretty ugly, pagar. Europe's starting to burn and we're next.
============
Posted by: When they pry my cold dead fingers from my torch. | September 30, 2010 at 10:28 AM