Powered by TypePad

« Pass A Law That Makes No Sense, Then Waive It | Main | Tyranny Of The Compassionate »

October 08, 2010

Comments

Now, how do you pronounce that name?

Nobel to Xiaobo!
======

Hey, burns happen.

Hey, shit burns.
========

Danube of Thought

The NY Times editorial board has long since had an air of self-parody about it.

Minus 12 at Raz today.

Neo
The 2010 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded Friday to Liu Xiaobo, a jailed Chinese democracy activist, in a move that infuriated China's government and could heighten tensions with the West by re-focusing international attention on Beijing's human rights record.

China responded by saying the decision violated the Nobel principles and could damage relations with Norway, where the Nobel Committee is based—even though the five-member body is independent of the government there.

China's official reaction would indicate that this is probably a good choice (as opposed to the general disbelief and hubris expressed over last year's pick).

Me?  I know nuttin'.  Nevah huhd of da man.

Yep, Neo. Vaclav Klaus likes him and that's enough for me.
============

clarice

The Hill reports Harry Reid's idiot son,Rory Reid, says Obamacare might hurt his state. Should have spoken upo earlier about this before his dad forced its passage.

Captain Hate

Mario Vargas Llosa was an excellent choice as well; I have to read "Conversation in the Cathedral".

narciso

It's instructive to note that Vargas Llosa was one of the strongest critics of Alan Garcia's bank nationalization campaign (sound
familiar) in the 1980s, and led essentially a
citizen's campaign for President, in 1990, on essentially free market principles, including
that of de Soto, Twenty years later, Garcia
is back, but he's much more sensible

Melinda Romanoff

Whatsa matter with Free Markets and de Soto?

And how is that Not sensible?

Captain Hate

Mel, narc can speak for himself but I think those things were what Vargas Llosa was promoting over Garcia at the time.

O/T Goddammit, this is what pisses me off at times at people like Laura Ingraham. She had Mitch McConnell on yesterday and didn't ask him a damn thing about he and his cohorts gutless decision not to strip Lisa Murdumbski's fat ass of her committee assignments but today's she got Joe Miller on and is asking him what he thought about it. Aaaaaarrrrgh

narciso

I guess that was too much a yadda, yadda moment, he lost to Fujimori, who liberalized
somewhat with an iron fist, under his vizier
Montesinos. The successors lincluding Toledo
and now Garcia, have followed a more or less
free market and are in the lead against Chavez,

Laura was a fave of mine, for a while, but she has seem to drop the ball when it comes
to these intra party maneuvers, and has become a real Mittens booster, I don't know
if that is synonymous

jimmyk

And how is that Not sensible?

I think Narciso meant "more sensible than the 1990 version of Garcia." We can all agree that Vargas Llosa was (and presumably still is) more sensible than Garcia.

Captain Hate

I dunno narc; Laura seems to be pretty pro-Tea Party. My problem, besides what I previously mentioned, is that she continues to give a forum to idiots like Pat Buchanan and Michael Savage; Pat should only be on MessNBC as an example of what those nutjobs think of as a conservative and Savage just creeps me out. Regarding Mitt; he still bothers me as a flip-flopper but his work behind the scenes for Scott Brown was impressive imo.

Melinda Romanoff

got it.

thank you, all.

(saved me a lot of reading, I'm not too strong on Southern Hemispere stuff, except Antarctica)

bgates

The many things government undeniably can and must do — and individuals cannot — includes putting out fires that threaten the community.

The many things includes?

What's TM talking about calling that a great point, anyway? The NYT may as well say that the demons in fire can be defeated only by shamans from the priest-king, and the rest of the tribe is powerless before their juju.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Wilson/Plame