Folks contemplating the latest TSA security procedures don't seem to care for the latest Big Government idea of subjecting their mother, wife or daughters to a sexual assault.
But if your ire flags, remember this - no one will be groping Michelle, Sasha or Malia. These new procedures only apply to the little people. Just one more disconnect between our President and the people he "serves".
NOT QUTE A MAN OF THE PEOPLE: Incoming Speaker John Boehner will fly commericial but his security arrangements do not include the standard lines and pat downs.
FILE THIS UNDER "DON'T ASK, DON'T ASK...": It has been widely reported that the TSA patdowns are done on a same-sex basis (and we can only imagine Al Gore's disappointment), so presumably they acknowledge that there are some sexual issues in play.
However, I assume the TSA does not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. So put this on our list of Frequently Unasked Questions - does the flying public really not care whether they are being groped by a gay person? Do they not mind if their child is being groped by a person who might be gay? I applaud America's broad-mindedness.
As to possible comparisons to doctors and nurses who keep intimate contact very professional, please - I don't think the TSA people have quite that background or level of training.
My Bold Prediction as to where this non-debate is headed - yesterday, you were a homophobe if you didn't support gay marriage. Today, you are a homophobe if you don't support the right of gay TSA workers to grope same-sex passengers.
And then of course there is this:
I think perhaps it is a law of nature that when a government has too much power it goes stark raving insane.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | November 18, 2010 at 07:40 PM
Meanwhile, remember the National Guard troops sent to the border this September? They've been ordered to withdraw by the end of February.
LUN
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 18, 2010 at 07:52 PM
I liked a lot of what I read in "Young Guns," but one thing I found disappointing was the mention of Ray LaHood as a "moderate Republican."
Posted by: PD | November 18, 2010 at 07:52 PM
yep
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 18, 2010 at 07:52 PM
I guess the primary lesson of the Obama maladministration is that Democrats consider the primary purpose of government to protect criminals, aliens, and terrorists while harassing and terrorizing American citizens.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 18, 2010 at 07:54 PM
LaHood could probably mandate single station car radios tuned to NPR as a life saving mechanism too.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 18, 2010 at 07:57 PM
Here's a utube on TSA overreach
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhkQoiaf7Uc&feature=player_embedded>Govt thuggery>/a>
Posted by: Clarice | November 18, 2010 at 08:10 PM
Remember the photo at Drudge of the nun being assaulted? I have to believe that she showed them valid ID with a photo, that would verify that she was who she purported to be. So why was it necessary to subject her to that indignity? I understand that all cases may not be that clear, but plenty are. This is PC gone mad.
Posted by: anduril | November 18, 2010 at 08:19 PM
Just enforce the laws against involuntary vehicular manslaughter. Distracted driving causing death should be punished. Personal responsibility, retributive justice, and liberty are preferable to totalitarianism.
Posted by: Jim Ryan | November 18, 2010 at 08:21 PM
Distracted driving? This is the solution? It won't happen because it actually would affect Michelle, Sasha, Malia and Barry.
Shut down all those news outlets that disagree with me. Get to it. Rid me of that meddlesome network. Be quick about it. Now let it be written, now let it be done.
Posted by: MarkO | November 18, 2010 at 08:23 PM
Just enforce the laws against involuntary vehicular manslaughter.
Ah, but that requires more will than passing a new law. And new laws have the advantage of giving the state more power.
As far as the totalitarians are concerned, ignoring an existing law and passing a new one is pure win. New powers, no effort.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 18, 2010 at 08:29 PM
Presidential line of succession timetable:
Obama arrested before Christmas.
Biden declines.
New Speaker of the House, Boehner, in.
Posted by: BR | November 18, 2010 at 08:47 PM
BR -- Boehner's not Speaker until January. If the timeline you posit is followed, we'll have President Pelosi.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 18, 2010 at 08:49 PM
James Carville was in front of me in the security line at DCA this morning, heading out to "Nawlins". I was hoping he might be subjected to a monty squeeze, but no such luck.
Posted by: flodigarry | November 18, 2010 at 08:49 PM
Help me on this, 'cause I don't spend time at Hillbuzz. They were just described on Entertainment tonight as a "conservative" blog. Didn't they get started as Hillary supporters that gave up on crazy libs?
Posted by: sbw | November 18, 2010 at 08:50 PM
Didn't they get started as Hillary supporters that gave up on crazy libs?
Failure to toe the line makes them "conservative" because "conservative" is media-speak for "frothing mad breakers intent on turning back the Revolution".
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 18, 2010 at 08:53 PM
sbw, yes.
Posted by: Jim Ryan | November 18, 2010 at 08:54 PM
First they disable your cell phone.
Then they disable your car.
Then maybe you get nekked for public transporation.
Hey, don't these guys own OnStar?
Posted by: Marko | November 18, 2010 at 08:56 PM
Yes they did, they lean more toward Sarah then most, just like when the New Republic
briefly endorsed some Reagan initiatives, it
made them a right publication, in that short interregnum, in some people's eye
Posted by: narciso | November 18, 2010 at 08:57 PM
List of ObamaCare waivers
Note how many of them are unions.
There's even an SEIU local on the list. You know, the organization that organized, sometimes violently, in favor of ObamaCare.
Posted by: PD | November 18, 2010 at 10:01 PM
Good News:
Gadsden Flag License Plates A Nationwide Movement
Here is another great license plate:
Posted by: Ann | November 18, 2010 at 11:35 PM
Picture of the Day:
Posted by: Ann | November 18, 2010 at 11:44 PM
Ha, ha, ha, Rob. We can always call on Haig to step in for a week or two :)
Posted by: BR | November 19, 2010 at 03:07 AM
Drudge has many links up on the TSA fiasco. The high-volume Thanksgiving air travelling will exacerbate the outrage by personal experience and word of mouth.
Who needs the MSM.
Newsweek's cover of Obama as a Hindu God is an insult to Hindus. They didn't even get the right God. It's not Shiva, it's Kali, Goddess of the Thugs.
Posted by: BR | November 19, 2010 at 06:21 AM
Someone on one of the threads was asking about Hillbuzz being conservative. I hadn't
been to the site for a while, but their lead article right now looks like the truth and nothing but the truth.
Don't touch my junk as a cultural turning point.
The TSA mess is not going to get any better until they follow the Hillbuzz advice.
Posted by: Pagar | November 19, 2010 at 06:35 AM
Very good 5-minute Youtube speech by Congressman Paul: Enough is Enough to TSA. He's proposing a one-line bill that would prevent the govt from doing anything the people are not allowed to do. Like Jane's "You Too" concept. He talks about Americans having become too submissive.
Posted by: BR | November 19, 2010 at 06:49 AM
Tku, Pagar! Yes, both the Krauthammer WaPo article link there and Hillbuzz are spot on. Profiling based on what we already know about terrorists on planes is the simple and correct answer to prevent this outrage.
Posted by: BR | November 19, 2010 at 07:20 AM
"Profiling" has become so PC-laden that law enforcement either has to push it back in use with a vengeance as that word, or choose a new one like common sense or standard investigatory procedure.
Posted by: BR | November 19, 2010 at 07:25 AM
A little ironic that the privacy aspect that we get upset about is 'physical' privacy, and while our attention is distracted with this one, we give up mindlessly to the mercantile enabled danger.
===============
Posted by: Worse than search. | November 19, 2010 at 07:37 AM
Airports Consider Congressman's Call to Ditch TSA
Posted by: Extraneus | November 19, 2010 at 07:53 AM
Kim, What we need to do is stop all of them.
I believe the Tea Party is helping to do that but it is going to take a lot of work by all of us. IMO, what we post on line helps. Supporting groups that Sen Rockefeller and the olther leftist want banned helps. Supporting Palin, Demint and others that seem to drive the leftists up the wall helps.
Posted by: Pagar | November 19, 2010 at 07:58 AM
"Profiling" has become so PC-laden that law enforcement either has to push it back in use with a vengeance as that word, or choose a new one like common sense or standard investigatory procedure.
How about "intelligence"? With the intentional double meaning.
Posted by: jimmyk | November 19, 2010 at 07:59 AM
Smile :) The first picture I get when I see the word "mercantile" is bazaars of Arabian Nights and magical Persian carpets.
I guess you mean the airport scanners? Or the ever-increasing govt cameras in public places, or the way people expose their private lives on Facebook, or on their cell phones, or how people's lives are tracked through their credit cards and grocery shopping discount cards, etc.
Anyway, it's my bedtime, so I'll have sweet dreams.
Posted by: BR | November 19, 2010 at 07:59 AM
I like it, JimmyK :)
It's a sip, either way :)
Posted by: BR | November 19, 2010 at 08:01 AM
Someone mentioned the other day how the terrorists can defeat this whole system, and that's by waiting in a long, crowded, snaking line at one of the big airports, getting all the way up to the security checkpoint, and detonating. What do we do after that? Only allow one person at a time into the airport? Who'd want to be a sitting duck, stuck in a cattle corral after that?
Posted by: Extraneus | November 19, 2010 at 08:07 AM
Yah, was it Stephanie? How far back can the checkpoint be? All the way back to the madrassas and the Koran?
Posted by: BR | November 19, 2010 at 08:16 AM
Have we tried censuring Muslim extremists? Maybe we're saving that powerful tool until things get really bad.....
Posted by: Janet | November 19, 2010 at 08:18 AM
The high-volume Thanksgiving air travelling will exacerbate the outrage by personal experience and word of mouth.
Personally thinking holiday air travel is going to take a hit, numbers wise.
"I think we could use half the personnel and streamline the system," Mica said Wednesday, calling the TSA a bloated bureaucracy.
How long has the TSA been in existence again?
Posted by: Pofarmer | November 19, 2010 at 08:32 AM
The Koran incites to violence with promise of sex.
The TSA incites to violence with threat of sex.
Posted by: The Imp | November 19, 2010 at 08:34 AM
Perhaps a gamut of pig blood and naked women might help.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 19, 2010 at 08:38 AM
Or have a mullah as hostage on every plane. Or paint the face of Osama bin Laden or Mohammed on every plane. Would they still crash it?
Posted by: BR | November 19, 2010 at 08:44 AM
Janet, Of course not, that would be wrong acoording to the leftists.
Here is why absolutely nothing the American leftists do makes sense unless you are seeking the destruction of the US
LA Sheriffs dept/FBI invite radical muslim leaders to teach them about stopping islamic terrorism.
Did they invite the ones that are actually stopping the Islamic terrorism in Israel? NO.
They invited the ones that are causing the terrorism. This is insane.
Posted by: Pagar | November 19, 2010 at 08:45 AM
How about for every plane you crash, we'll crash one into that black rock at Mecca, that used to be a Hindu Shiva shrine.
Posted by: BR | November 19, 2010 at 08:47 AM
I would think a radical Muslim's advice would be pretty simple: convert, surrender or die. That's what the Prophet laid out, so anything else would just be lying (Taqiyya).
Posted by: Extraneus | November 19, 2010 at 08:52 AM
Profiling based on what we already know about terrorists on planes is the simple and correct answer to prevent this outrage.
Muslims attacked us on 9/11. So the TSA goes out of its way to search everyone but Muslims, who object to being searched.
No problem there.
Posted by: PD | November 19, 2010 at 08:57 AM
ABC News describes the airport security prodecure in Israel. It also mentions TSA going to G-rated "stick man" scanners, which for some reason will be first in place at the infamous Logan Airport.
Posted by: DebinNC | November 19, 2010 at 09:05 AM
Exactly Extraneus. Convert, surrender, or die. Under the guise of "religious freedom", Islam has our PC brainwashed leaders in submission already.
Islam is evil, evil, evil.
Posted by: Janet | November 19, 2010 at 09:07 AM
I believe in reciprocity:
Anyone who believes in "Convert, surrender, or die" should have the same option.
Convert away from violence, surrender, or die.
Posted by: sbw | November 19, 2010 at 09:33 AM
Speaking of surrender or die, does anyone know why we had Republicans voting for S510?
May be the most dangerous bill in the history of the US. It is to our food what the bailout was to our economy, only we can live without money.
“If accepted [S 510] would preclude the public’s right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes. It will become the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one’s choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God.” ~Dr. Shiv Chopra, Canada Health whistleblower
It is similar to what India faced with imposition of the salt tax during British rule, only S 510 extends control over all food in the US, violating the fundamental human right to food."
Posted by: pagar | November 19, 2010 at 09:35 AM
The fact that the MSM, especially local TV outlets are now matching cable news in this coverage, will only increase the outrage and I believe cause the TSA/DHS to back down. It has gone viral on the internet and forwareded email. It is finally showing what a bafoon Incompetano and The Won really are here. Coming on the heels of Ghailani verdict - this administration has finally sank to the depths of The Gong Show - and is getting full page and local TV coverage of it for the first time. The unions won't be able to save this FUBAR exercise - only a full retreat will be able to bring back some modicum of any sanity.
Oh, and before that happens, watch the Dems/Libs/WH attack Mica for accepting donations from those private firms he wants to replace TSA. That will be their window to figure out how to back track.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | November 19, 2010 at 09:37 AM
Hope you're right Jack.
Posted by: NK | November 19, 2010 at 09:43 AM
Minus 17 at Raz today.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | November 19, 2010 at 09:48 AM
we give up mindlessly to the mercantile enabled danger
The what?
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 19, 2010 at 09:48 AM
I've got 2 Sturbridge Tea Party t-shirts left that I'd like to give away to JOMers. One L & One XL. (The L has been washed & dried but never worn.)
Anyway...just email me at theshagams at gmail dot com & I'll mail ya one.
My treat...I'm encouraging Rabble-Rousing.
Posted by: Janet | November 19, 2010 at 09:54 AM
The Dems slammed Bush's "color" terror alert system, but at least it told the public what the threat level was at a given time. Europe, especially Germany, is on high alert at the moment, but the only indication we're facing similar credible threats is the escalating intrusiveness of Obama's TSA. Unlike Merkel, Obama's voting present on our safety while letting Incompetano and probably very reluctant TSA workers take the blame and face the reaction while he floats above it. Carville was spot on about Obama's missing junk.
Posted by: DebinNC | November 19, 2010 at 09:56 AM
1L+1XL = 1XXL? That would just about fit.
Posted by: sbw | November 19, 2010 at 10:18 AM
What are they gonna do after the first "rectum bomb" goes off?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | November 19, 2010 at 10:18 AM
If we decided to "win" the war, we could all just walk on planes like we once did.
Posted by: MarkO | November 19, 2010 at 10:19 AM
What are they gonna do after the first "rectum bomb" goes off?
Nominate it for the presidency.
(Or did they already do that?)
Posted by: Rob Crawford | November 19, 2010 at 10:21 AM
((Carville was spot on about Obama's missing junk))
problem is, Deb, if he had more junk in the way Carville meant it, he'd be doubling down with every protest, making things doubly onerous.
Posted by: Chubby | November 19, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Maybe the subject of another thread, a member of the Soufan Group speaks out, 'removing all doubt' in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | November 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM
1L+1XL = 1XXL? That would just about fit.
LOL sbw! But the XL is gone now...so one L left. Any takers???
Posted by: Janet | November 19, 2010 at 10:27 AM
How about the Large Janet, I think it would fit
Posted by: narciso | November 19, 2010 at 10:34 AM
It is yours narciso...contact me through that gmail above, or through FB & I'll mail it to you today.
Posted by: Janet | November 19, 2010 at 10:36 AM
See LUN for an article on why El Al's procedures (which focus on profiling and highly trained security officials) wouldn't work in America. I hope that as more and more folks understand the lunacy of the TSA approach, the supposed reasons why El Al's approach wouldn't work here (the primary ones being cost and aversion to profiling) will be undercut.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | November 19, 2010 at 10:51 AM
I'm glad the pilots described in the LUN made it through security, and I suspect the passengers on the flight were, too. See LUN(good article to keep in mind for anyone complaining about a hard day at work).
Posted by: Thomas Collins | November 19, 2010 at 11:01 AM
If we decided to "win" the war, we could all just walk on planes like we once did.
True. That would involve beating fundamentalist Muslims into such a state of submission that they renounce several commands of their Prophet, and institute enforcement of the new tenets so as to avoid any further beating. I'm all for it.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 19, 2010 at 11:20 AM
The opposite of "Hey, kids, don't try this to home."
Posted by: DebinNC | November 19, 2010 at 11:32 AM
So, do you guys miss me yet\/
Posted by: Jane | November 19, 2010 at 12:16 PM
You bet we do, Jane.
Posted by: Clarice | November 19, 2010 at 12:27 PM
DebinNC,
Its missing a guy in a khaffiyeh and suicide vest, for one. And it needs to update to feature a backscatter full body scan machine. But knowing LEGO, they will probably be out with that set in the next month. I can't wait for Mattel to come out with the pat-down Barbie and Ken dolls. Now I know what happened to all the old, used CPR mannequins - the TSA has them as stimulators:)
Posted by: Jack is Back! | November 19, 2010 at 12:28 PM
::stimulators = simulators::
Or in the case of the TSA, does it?
Posted by: Jack is Back! | November 19, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Jane! You're irreplaceable!
Posted by: PD | November 19, 2010 at 12:30 PM
How could we not miss you, Jane?
Posted by: Captain Hate | November 19, 2010 at 12:32 PM
What are they gonna do after the first "rectum bomb" goes off?
Admit the sh*t has hit the fan.
Posted by: sbw | November 19, 2010 at 12:37 PM
how about we screen for terrorists in Pakistan? Is this the Madrassa from which the terrorists come? Screen it with a Predator.
Is this the ISI facility that controls the madrassa and the Al Quaeda? Screen it with high explosives.
Most of the problem solved. Have them send the check to [email protected]
Posted by: matt | November 19, 2010 at 12:46 PM
Iowahawk: Comply With Me, the Video
Posted by: DebinNC | November 19, 2010 at 12:48 PM
♫ Proctology is such a lovely trade... ♫
lol
Posted by: Extraneus | November 19, 2010 at 01:02 PM
I think we're due another Airplane update, reality has gotten that strange. Robert Hayes
could play the Peter Graves role
Posted by: narciso | November 19, 2010 at 01:07 PM
I'm not joking, and don't call me Shirley.
Posted by: matt | November 19, 2010 at 02:25 PM
Admit the sh*t has hit the fan.
ha ha ha ha hah!
Posted by: MayBee | November 19, 2010 at 02:34 PM
I flew home in the middle of October to see my family. I had to go through a scanner and they used the wand on me and I went through the metal detector and all that...and I honestly did not think it was that big a deal. I am a woman in my 50s so maybe I am beyond the point of being that modest...but honestly it seems to me that some people are over reacting to this. I did not see or hear anyone getting upset or raising hell about the process, everyone just wanted to get on with it and catch their flights.
A lot of people seem to think that we should do what the Israelis do, but I am not sure that would work here. The US is so much larger, there are so many more people flying and besides, I don't think Americans would like that process anymore than this one. They do background checks on people, they interview them and ask them questions about their travel plans, and if necessary they will search them..they don't just get some vibe off of people so that they just know who can and can not be trusted. I just don't know if Americans want some TSA agents asking them the purpose of their trip anymore than they want to go through the scanner.
And I also don't think profiling is enough. There will be people that won't fit the profile, and there is always the possibility of identity theft.
I do think the TSA could use more common sense and common courtesy when they deal with the public, but really I just do not think this is some big constitutional issue. After all, you don't have to fly. People voluntarily place themselves in this situation. I think that makes it hard to make it a 4th amendment issue.
Posted by: Terrye | November 19, 2010 at 07:24 PM
I don't think Americans would like that process anymore than this one.
Dunno about that. I've been through the Israeli process a few times, and it's not at all unpleasant if you have nothing to hide. Like having a chat with someone at the bar. "Have you been to Israel before? Do you speak Hebrew? Do you have any relatives in Israel?" And the like, all in a matter of fact, pleasant tone. And it's kind of reassuring, because you can tell they are trained to spot liars. And I'm not sure it takes that much more manpower than the TSA system.
Posted by: jimmyk | November 19, 2010 at 08:22 PM
Terrye:
After all, you don't have to fly. People voluntarily place themselves in this situation.
Who's you,pale face?
Sure. I don't have to fly. I should probably go in the office on Monday and tell my boss that. Because I don't have to have a job,either. That certainly would be a voluntary decision.
Posted by: hit and run | November 20, 2010 at 12:05 AM