Dan Drezner describes the fade of Al Qaeda. He does not emphasize the point but his argument is part of the case against the build-up in Afghanistan.
MY STRATEGY FOR REVIVING AL QAEDA: Kevin Drum explains that, as a member of the enlightened left, he realizes that this whole terror thing is overdone but really, the left must learn to pander to, or a least establish some rapport with, the Great Unwashed who don't want to get blown up.
Such equanimity! Of course, the real issue is that Al Qaeda is a bunch of ethnics with anti-Western aspirations, so what's for a lefty to not to like? But I know plenty of lefties who run in fear from apples or salad if you mention pesticides or preservatives, and where is the equanimity and calm assessment of risk there?
If Al Qaeda really wants to terrify the Enlightened Left they should announce their incorporation and declare some profit objectives.
excellent! Maybe we could stir the pot by saying they are for nuclear energy, against windmills and geothermal and solar and affirmative action, esp against AA for women and non believers. Also they love salt and transfats.
heh
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 01:44 PM
Just let me know when I don't have to be stip searched at the airport. Until then, they have won.
Posted by: MarkO | December 05, 2010 at 01:51 PM
stip? Even typing the word strip upsets me.
Posted by: MarkO | December 05, 2010 at 01:52 PM
Clarice-
Too late. Osama sided with Al Gore and Democrats in the fight against climate change.
Posted by: RichatUF | December 05, 2010 at 01:57 PM
Well Gore changed his mind on ethanol from corn, can Osama be far behind?
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 03:55 PM
As much as many prognosticators and so-called experts are saying President Obama is going to have a tough time getting re-elected, the reality of the situation is that President Obama will get re-elected against almost any potential GOP challenger.
However, one candidate cannot be over-looked. If we learned anything from 2008, we should've learned that organization and social media skills are paramount to a campaign. No one is actually going to "come out of nowhere". To become the most powerful person in the world, you have to build quite an organization. That's why only one person has a chance to beat President Obama in 2012.
This will make it all clear:
http://mittromneycentral.com/2010/05/07/no-apology-song-the-case-for-american-greatness/
Posted by: Dan | December 05, 2010 at 04:15 PM
So why did he quit, Dan, with the money, the support of the conservative commentariat, and why should we take a chance again, after he
decided not to run for a second term,
Posted by: narciso | December 05, 2010 at 04:21 PM
The Atlantic filled with liberals, is urging its readers not donate to Israel for the forest fires. Is there even a pretext among these lefties of not being anti Semites anymore ( if there ever was ). Disgusting.
Posted by: Gmax | December 05, 2010 at 04:33 PM
Is there a link Gmax?
Posted by: Janet | December 05, 2010 at 04:48 PM
Romney is toast - as anyone living under Romneycare will tell you.
Cheney in 2012!
Posted by: Jane | December 05, 2010 at 05:04 PM
Never mind, here it is.
Don't give to the Jewish National Fund...the Israelis have enough money? I believe giving to the JNF is a choice. Maybe our gov't could stop forcing ME to give to Planned Parenthood. It has a lot of rich supporters too...let them pay to kill babies.
Posted by: Janet | December 05, 2010 at 05:24 PM
Rebuilding the House
“November 10, 2010 1:25 PM
By Congressman Tom McClintock
More than a year ago, Pollster Frank Luntz stood before a group of about 40 House Republicans in a cramped conference room. “I need to tell you something,” he said. “I’ve been looking at polling data from Congressional districts across America for the last three months. I’m convinced that you are going to be in the majority next year.” After a long pause, he added, “This time, please don’t screw it up again.”
I don’t think we will.
The message of the last two elections could not be louder or clearer. Great parties are built upon great principles and they are judged by their devotion to those principles. From its inception, the core principles of the Republican Party have been individual freedom and constitutionally limited government. The closer it has hewn to these principles, the better it has done. The further it has strayed from them…well, my God!
In the aftermath of the Bush debacle, House Republican leaders resolved to restore traditional Republican principles as the policy and political focus of the party and they achieved something no one at the time thought possible: they united House Republicans as a determined voice of opposition to the Left and rallied the American people. Republicans rediscovered why they were Republicans, and Republican leaders rediscovered Reagan’s advice to paint our positions in bold colors and not hide them in pale pastels.
(Ironically, in Reagan’s home state, Republicans tried to campaign to the left of the Democrats and the result was disastrous. While the rest of the country was celebrating historic Republican gains (including a shift of at least 61 U.S. House Seats, 6 U.S. Senate Seats, 680 state legislative seats, 19 state legislatures and six governors), the statewide Republican ticket in California imploded. Republicans nationally now hold more state legislative seats than in any year since 1928. In California, they hold fewer than at any time since 1978!)
House Republicans were unfairly criticized as the party of “No.” When somebody is driving you off a cliff, “no” is a handy word to have in your vocabulary. But it can’t be the only word in the national debate over the future of the country and Republicans know it.
Over the last two years, House Republicans laid out detailed plans to revive the finances of our government and the prosperity of our economy, to return freedom of choice, competition and affordability to health care, to restore the integrity of our borders, and to return to our states their rightful powers and prerogatives.
A Republican House cannot alone enact such laws, but it no longer must labor in the obscurity of minority irrelevance. It now has the opportunity to elevate the national debate by putting forward these plans at a time when Americans are alert to the danger facing the nation and eager for an adult discussion about the fundamental mechanics of freedom – how freedom works and how we can put it back to work.
In 1858, Lincoln warned the nation that two antithetical philosophies, freedom and slavery, competed for the future and reminded us that a house divided against itself cannot stand. “I do not believe the house will fall,” he said, “but I do believe that it will cease to be divided.” Today two incompatible philosophies, freedom and socialism, compete for our future and the stage is set for one of the greatest debates in the history of the American Republic.
Upon the outcome of that debate rests the question of whether the United States of America will fade inexorably into history or whether it will begin its next great era of expansion, prosperity and influence.
Tom McClintock was first elected to the California 4th Congressional District by a margin of 1,800 votes in 2008 and re-elected by a margin of 70,000 votes in 2010.”
Remember Kyl’s earmark for a settlement for a lawsuit from the Indians over water rights.
">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emJeWLJ_iQU"> More McClintock
McClintock for PREZ!!
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 05, 2010 at 05:27 PM
But, Jane, as a friend wrote when I suggested I could find no reason for anyone ever to have voted for John F Kerry that innumerable psychological papers have noted the huge weight people give to tall men with good hair when it comes to voting.
That's the only reason I can see why people people mentioning Romney.A primitive belief that tall men with manes should lead.
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 05:29 PM
I hope you mean Liz, Janet.
You could do like fat Teddy and sub Obama for Osama re this topic and discussion.
Everyone have their decorations up for Christmas and Hannakah?
We do - Yippeeee!
Posted by: Jack is Back! | December 05, 2010 at 05:31 PM
If I follow the goldberg piece I suppose I was in error in giving to the victims of Katrina and so many other disasters in which govt inadequacy played a role.
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 05:33 PM
Difference is, of course Clarice, that the Joooooooos werent in charge of those.
Posted by: Gmax | December 05, 2010 at 05:50 PM
And to think, I had felt guilty for this, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | December 05, 2010 at 06:03 PM
Could well be. In fact I'm sure it is. almost all large scale tragedies including famines involve a certain degree of government maladministration.
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 06:03 PM
Sorry, is more like it, but apparently he chose to suck up to his accuser
Posted by: narciso | December 05, 2010 at 06:07 PM
It's probably hard to get people to read anything in the Atlantic so you can expect the writers to write even more provocatively.
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 06:13 PM
Saudi Arabia and the other Arab states have no meaningful lobby in Washington
I guess the State Dept isn't a lobby per se.
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 05, 2010 at 06:15 PM
and how about my families tax money going to Moammar Gadhafi's kid's charities????
or the millions of our tax dollars to build a shrine to Ted Kennedy while his son is listed as one of the richest in Congress after his inheritance????
The JNF is a choice...why should Mr. Goldberg care?
Posted by: Janet | December 05, 2010 at 06:16 PM
Indeed. To ask the question is to answer it, Janet.
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 06:18 PM
I guess the State Dept isn't a lobby per se.
Exactly, or our universities.
Posted by: Janet | December 05, 2010 at 06:18 PM
A thought experiment, would a CIA director, be lounging around at the pool of the Israeli
Ambassador's house, like Tenet was at Prince
Bandar, rhetorical question I know.
Posted by: narciso | December 05, 2010 at 06:22 PM
Gad, I watch 30 seconds of football and catch America's Team's Footing Star fall. Hatetes etceterates happy in C-Land.
=============
Posted by: Climate? What's climate? | December 05, 2010 at 06:35 PM
It took me a moment to realize the horseshoes were for the Colts, not the Cowboys.
==========
Posted by: It was football it was. | December 05, 2010 at 06:40 PM
The Andy we loved.
">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNxLxTZHKM8"> What it was, Was Football.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 05, 2010 at 06:47 PM
Didn't BO ridicule Bush for not getting Bin Laden? So...I guess he's had better results?
Posted by: Specter | December 05, 2010 at 06:49 PM
If Obama can't catch Bin Laden, it only means Bin Laden isn't important any more. Don't you follow along?
Posted by: MarkO | December 05, 2010 at 06:58 PM
Everyone knows that Osama is in Karl Rove's basement.
Posted by: hit and run | December 05, 2010 at 07:10 PM
And Sarah is in Rove's head.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 05, 2010 at 07:28 PM
Al-Qaeda is simply a part of the jihadist movement. When American cartoonists aren't forced to disappear because they are under a death warrant for daring to suggest that a draw Muhammad day is in order, when Ayaan Hirsi Ali no longer needs bodyguards, when the Metropolitan Museum of Art can bring out its Muhammad images again, and US government employees no longer grope airline passengers, I'd say we have the jihadist threat under control. At the moment, I'd say the threat is most assuredly not under control.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | December 05, 2010 at 07:50 PM
More succintly put, TC, Osama is as Will Smith might put 'old and busted' (he's almost
as old as Mel Gibson) Awlaki, is by contrast,
'the new kid on the block' American educated, fluent in English, conversant in Western culture, which makes him imminently more dangerous
Posted by: narciso | December 05, 2010 at 07:58 PM
See LUN for an article by Angelo Codevilla on why US governmental officials overstate the importance of bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, namely, that such overstating fits the talking point that terrorism is the result of actions of rogue groups as opposed to states. Codevilla argues that states use terrorist organizations to further the states' policies.
In the article Codevilla states the following:
Codevilla's views deserve a more thorough airing in the US foreign policy establishment than they have received. It is a sign of lack of rigor in such establishment that Codevilla's views are not given more play.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | December 05, 2010 at 08:04 PM
OT, but should be interesting to all the jazz fans out there. The following was just sent from an old friend from the East Midlands.
Tomorrow we will raise a glass to Dave [Brubeck] to salute his 90th Birthday. I guess there has been the same attention on your side of the pond.
The BBC has been pulling out all stops over here: Radio 2 has a two part 2 hour interview with Dave by Jamie Cullum, good stuff with plenty of music. Part 2 next week has Jamie playing together with Darius Chris and Dan. Even Radio 4 had a half hour programme with Paul Gambo'.
BBC TV excelled itself with 1 1/2 hours produced by Arena and Clint Eastwood. Lots of anecdotes from Dave and jazz personalities and musical interludes including that wonderful Dave Brubeck / Jay McShan session from Clint Eastwood's 'Blues' programme.
Our own highlight was to brave the weather and go to Buxton for a concert entitled "Brubecks Play Brubeck". In celebration of their Dad's 90th, Darius Chris and Dan plus British saxophonist Dave O'Higgins on Tenor and Soprano, played a truly magnificent selection of Dave's and their own work. The weather had depleted the audience but not the warmth of the reception or the enthusiasm of the performers. They gave lots of their time afterwards and came across as very open and friendly.
Given the time of year we had decided to stay over and to our surprise the Brubecks did too, in the same hotel. It was great to have further talks with them before going our separate ways. They had some pretty grim journeys too, going to Croydon that day, then Eastbourne Friday before flying home for Dad's big day. We hope they made it O.K.
You will get the impression that I am still on a bit of a high. This was in no way just a nostalgia trip, the geat thing about jazz is that it can still do this to you at any time and you still don't see it coming.
I had the privilege of seeing the (classic) Brubeck Quartet on its very last performance in Tempe. Sat on a folding chair in front of the first row due to it being oversold.
Posted by: Manuel Transmission | December 05, 2010 at 08:06 PM
TC Codevilla is quite right on that I think. Laurie Mylroie, much maligned, made this point years ago for which she has been excoriated. Anyone who thinks the 9/11 splodey dopes managed what they did without aid--probably from Iraq's intel services--is someone SCAM would like on its mailing list.
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 08:12 PM
MT-
Ravinia was where I last saw him, but not at this show. Always a treat.
Are you telling me saw him with Paul Desmond version?
I'll pull that session out of your ears and put it to tape, next time I see you.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | December 05, 2010 at 08:18 PM
Wow Man Tran. I'm impressed.
Has anyone else noticed that all the democrats say constantly: "The voters told us they want the 2 parties to work together (so make sure you cave in on what I want)".
I think that is the talking point we are going to hear over and over and it is just wrong.
The voters said: "we want less government, less spending, and adherence to the Constitution and if you have to have perpetual gridlock to get there, than gridlock it shall be.
Posted by: Jane | December 05, 2010 at 08:18 PM
Having read Lacey's "Inside the Kingdom" his successor to his 1979 look at the Saud fiefdom, I would tend to agree. The fact that one Baluchi family, seems to have been at the heart of practically every major operation, from 1st WTC to Gitmo, would validate that view
Posted by: narciso | December 05, 2010 at 08:24 PM
It takes the pressure off our foreign policy folks, Clarice, if the populace is focused on al-Qaeda's downward slope instead of Hamas, Hezbollah, FARC and their supporters.
This is one of the things that makes JOM great. Interweaving discussions of national security policy and Dave Brubeck on the same thread.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | December 05, 2010 at 08:24 PM
Narciso, is your uncle feeling better?
Posted by: Thomas Collins | December 05, 2010 at 08:27 PM
I'm always impressed by Man Tran and I'd say that even if I weren't hoping to someday hitch a ride with my cat on his batmobile.
Yes, Jane..they thought "I won" and "permanent majority" and no entrance to House committees or Obamacare deliberations was just the ticket until they lost big time.
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 08:37 PM
Jane your exactly right. Someone wrote before the election that the voters were going for a "restraining order." I think that is almost dead solid perfect.
If we cant convince the Democrats to stop with the nonsense, then gridlock is exactly what 56% of the voting public wants.
Posted by: Gmax | December 05, 2010 at 08:43 PM
Dead Solid Perfect was the name of a wonderful hamburger joint in College Station, TX. Hmmmmmm...great burgers.
Posted by: Janet | December 05, 2010 at 08:54 PM
Thanks for Codevilla's thoughts TC.
Very creditable speculation.
Astounding that Friedman once had a sane thought. Did he wonder if China was a source of terrorism? ;)
Posted by: mockmook | December 05, 2010 at 08:58 PM
Friedman is infuriating, he came up with 'Hama rules' yet his hatred seems more focused
on Israel rather than Syria. He supported the Iraq invasion, and then stepped away like the Alsops, did on Vietnam. In lighter news, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | December 05, 2010 at 09:08 PM
Mel,
Definitely the last Paul D. session. I was also a fan of Joe M. He even did a clinic in Phx that I had a chance to sit in on. Gave me a wonderful sense of depth to the drummer's game. Both encounters gave me a real sense that my guardian angel was a jazz fan.
Posted by: Manuel Transmission | December 05, 2010 at 09:19 PM
Report: Al Qaeda Claims Responsibility For Deadly Israeli Fire
And in America the left is cheering the deaths of 41 Israelis and so much destruction.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | December 05, 2010 at 09:35 PM
Sara, I don't think AQ really did this . It is their wont to claim credit for such disasters because they have so little to show these days to recruits.
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 09:39 PM
I wondered that too, Clarice, but then I read earlier that Israel arrested two young Arabs, so now I don't know what to think. In any case, it is a very sad set of circumstances and it frosts me to no end to see how some Americans are reacting. I just do not get it.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | December 05, 2010 at 09:52 PM
If Nancy is unhappy then Gmax is a very happy guy. Prepare yourself for an absolute hysterical reaction come announcement of the compromise, but here is what is being reported already:
"We're moving in that direction," Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat said dejectedly when Bob Schieffer, host of "Face the Nation" on CBS, asked him if the 2001 and 2003 tax rates would be extended even for the wealthy. "And we're only moving there against my judgment," Mr. Durbin added.
In meetings with administration officials after the Senate votes, the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and many other House and Senate Democrats voiced deep unhappiness at the prospect of extending all the tax cuts and also expressed their belief that the White House did not appear to be getting enough for such a big concession, officials said.
Posted by: Gmax | December 05, 2010 at 10:00 PM
Sara always expect the worst from the left; you'll never be disappointed.
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 05, 2010 at 10:01 PM
I do get it and I agree, it's anger producing, but I think the men arrested were Druzes and the charge is negligence. There's no evidence this was done deliberately yet. That area is exceedingly dry. It's kind of like Malibu.It is BTW where children were once sacrificed to Baal --Probably by the ancestors of those who strap suicide belts on kids today
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 10:02 PM
No Clarice initial reports were Druze, but the recent corrected reports were two Arabs ( muslims not Druze ). One apparently was a Palestinian, so you have to wonder how he got into Israel, but the other was an Israeli Arab.
Posted by: Gmax | December 05, 2010 at 10:06 PM
TC,
Thanks for the Codevilla link. It is a rational speculation on the oligarch's response.
I'm curious as to your "ho hum" characterization of the response of someone with an austere Austrian eye on the current economic situation. The last debt event of this magnitude occasioned the assumption of power by the Democrat Party for some 70+ years (with a few breaks) and the imposition of "progressive" fantasies which have reached (exceeded?) the amount of OPM available for sustenance.
In response, the Democrat Party quaffed a nice, warm cup of arsenic with Stim I and followed it up with a cyanide chaser in the form of Obamacare. I don't believe there is a chapter on "party suicide" in the Austrian texts and I'm wondering about your opinion on what comes next.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | December 05, 2010 at 10:12 PM
Rick
I am assuming OPM is Other Peoples Money?
A term of art in the real estate world!
Posted by: Gmax | December 05, 2010 at 10:24 PM
Jim Hoft has this up:
Later reports said that while most of the residents of Ossafiya are Druze, the youths who were arrested are Arabs.
Posted by: Gmax | December 05, 2010 at 10:27 PM
Rick,
At least during the current Great Depression, the House has already flipped.
Maybe the GOP will be the party in power for the next 70 years.
Posted by: mockmook | December 05, 2010 at 10:36 PM
Rick, I wasn't careful in stating what I was ho-humming about. My reference was to how I thought an Austrian Schooler would view the response of the economy to the Barack/Nancy/Harry Stimulus and the Ben QE (in other words, the economy's response was unsurprising). I agree that how this all plays out for our domestic politics and place in the international system is far from ho-hum.
I am going to have to give your question more thought, but my initial reaction is that there is still enough entrepreneurial vigor and technological inventiveness in us that America as a self-evident truths polity will survive what will be a decade or longer struggle with adherents of the bureaucratic nanny state. Even if the Dem Party itself doesn't do so well, I think there are enough GOP nannies that this will be a tough struggle. One of the themes of Derek Leebaert's book on the Cold War was that our technological edge more than made up for us not having military strategists at the level of Soviets such as Ogarkov and Andropov. I think that element in us (technological inventivenss resulting from restlessness and vigor) is still an important element in our society, but that the Gramscian march through our institutions and through some of our best minds is going to make for a tough contest.
In any event, Rick, I realize the above response doesn't do justice to your query, but I'll take your query as a medium term homework assignment and get to work.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | December 05, 2010 at 10:40 PM
Gmax,
Correct. I'm beginning to suspect that Mad Ben's QE II+ project reflects the probability that Japan, China, the SS funds and other US pension funds won't be able to dig up another $1+ trillion for SEIU and AFSCME members this year. The SS funds have gone cash negative and Japan and China appear to be losing interest. ZIRP will tend to do that.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | December 05, 2010 at 10:44 PM
Watched Sarah Palin bag and dress a Caribou tonight on her Alaska show. The hew and cry from the left will be wonderful tomorrow.
Her daddy has a collection of animal skulls he shows the kids at school and drives a truck with a bumper sticker that says "Vegetarian is an Indian word for Poor Hunter". He is totally awesome and Sarah is a daddy's girl. (more frosting for the cake)
Meanwhile, these two always seem annoyed when standing for the US National Anthem .
Posted by: Ann | December 05, 2010 at 11:01 PM
TC Codevilla is quite right on that I think. Laurie Mylroie, much maligned, made this point years ago for which she has been excoriated.
Speaking of much maligned, wasn't this (holding nations primarily responsible for terrorism rather than rogue individuals) really part of the original "Bush Doctrine"?
Posted by: jimmyk | December 05, 2010 at 11:07 PM
mockmook,
That's certainly one potential outcome. The potential is there and the 2nd quartile (<$50K) is certainly available. Another few dozens or so of the oligarchs will have to take a tumbrel ride in order for it to happen.
TC,
I agree with your premise concerning technological potential and entrepreneurial vigor. I would also note that continued unemployment is going to make the EPA/OSHA combine a probable political negative.
The other huge factor is the demographic shift which is occurring. Asset protection is going to be very important as we begin the greatest inter-generational transfer of wealth in history. The following generation has a definite interest in gramps retaining as much of his estate as possible prior to its inevitable movement to a new home.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | December 05, 2010 at 11:08 PM
Some women want diamonds. [but] Blood, guts, and bullets, that me.
I got drug out onto the tundra by a bear.Shot it, but was left for dead for 10 days.
Posted by: Sue (Sarah's new pal) | December 05, 2010 at 11:18 PM
Drudge has a tale of Hillary chasing after some Iranian minister who's trying to avoid her and ducking her advances. Shades of Madeline Albright with Arafat. deja-vu all over again.
Posted by: maryrose | December 05, 2010 at 11:26 PM
Clarice,
Btw, your "Pieces" was excellent again today. My daughter's history teacher is now a big fan. :)
Posted by: Ann | December 05, 2010 at 11:29 PM
Thanks, Ann. Looking at the latest pic makes me wonder if there is a single bedspread or curtain left untouched in the WH.
Posted by: Clarice | December 05, 2010 at 11:34 PM
In that light, the fashion update from India, where they are still trying to view the Emperor's New Clothes, an epic fail, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | December 05, 2010 at 11:43 PM
I was watching this awesome WeaselZippers VIDEO on YouTube via Ace's, when I came across this other amusing VIDEO use of the same song.
What a great song; here is a live VIDEO performance.
Posted by: mockmook | December 05, 2010 at 11:43 PM
This ADN story tells us that the push is on ">http://www.adn.com/2010/12/04/1588308/a-gift-for-anwrs-50th-birthday.html"> to declare ANWR a National Monument, thereby permanently locking it up from Drilling or any other development.
Posted by: daddy | December 06, 2010 at 12:00 AM
LOL, Clarice. :) (I had the same thoughts).
Posted by: Ann | December 06, 2010 at 12:00 AM
mockmook, Janet has that first link of yours on facebook and it is awesome. Kept thinking of Soylent while watching it and hope he is safe.
daddy, Your link didn't work for me but that subject is a perfect diamond for someone to campaign on for 2012.
Posted by: Ann | December 06, 2010 at 01:00 AM
Ann,
It is ridiculous that we don't see stuff like is shown in WeaselZippers video every night on the news.
But, I'm sure Linsay Lohan has done something much more interesting (and important) today.
Is Janet's FB link public?
Posted by: mockmook | December 06, 2010 at 01:48 AM
mockmook, I agree. Email me at [email protected] and I will link you to Janet's facebook page where you can join.
She has great links.
btw,
Take MO out of the picture I posted above and just look at this smug POS:
The US National Anthem is playing and he is happy with the destruction of America he has brought.
But don't wake up with that picture, think of this:
I love Liz Cheney but Sarah has the grass roots Clarice spoke about today and the energy to bring it in 2012. Against all odds and the media, America Will Win Again. Who is more
electable? The “corpse man” and the bitter scolds who think they can drown her out, if they can just put enough spittle behind calling her an idiot or the refudiated woman with a winning sense of humor and some serious ideas to discuss that loves our country ? And can bag a caribou and fill her freezer without going to a grocery store, I might add. :)
Posted by: Ann | December 06, 2010 at 02:22 AM
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | December 06, 2010 at 02:29 AM
Good Night All, sorry for the auduril post below but daddy had a great link that should be read especially thinking about the 2012 election and who would be the greatest spokes woman against it:
Can we suggest that anyone that votes for his garbage hire a horse and buggy to deliver their behind to Congress or at least walk a few blocks when you are Sheila Jackson Lee and get a paid for government ride a block away from where you live.
Posted by: Ann | December 06, 2010 at 03:47 AM
Liveblogging the TSA experience at GSO at 4;30 am.
Ok,we're all set. Just a moment for last minute preparations,both technical and . . . Psychological.
And . . . We're done? That's it? No touching? No feeling? No cupping? No groping?
How disappointing.
Live from GSO this is hit and run with . . . Nothing to report. Back to you in the studio.
Posted by: hit and run | December 06, 2010 at 04:54 AM
"these two always seem annoyed when standing for the US National Anthem"
it must kill them to have to behave as if there's something superior to their egos.
"Looking at the latest pic makes me wonder if there is a single bedspread or curtain left untouched in the WH."
Billie Holiday called...she wants her dress back.
Posted by: macphisto | December 06, 2010 at 05:11 AM
``What if, in the real world,''
What if, indeed...lol
If we're going to blame Saudi Arabia for supporting terror, who do we blame for supporting Saudi Arabia? And even ahistorical fabulists like Clarice have no choice but to acknowledge that the Reagan administration's Pavlovian Cold War domestic politics gave the bin Ladenists their first lease on life as terrorists in a war Reagan himself called "Holy''...
Follow the money, indeed...
Posted by: bunkerbuster | December 06, 2010 at 05:30 AM
Civil Rights Commission Rips Justice Dept. Over New Black Panthers Case
POP QUIZ: When's the last time AP ever described a group as "liberal-dominated"? (Hint: Never?)Posted by: Extraneus | December 06, 2010 at 06:26 AM
Bubu, go back in your burrow. It isn't time for you to see if you can spot your shadow. Give us a peaceful winter.
Dave, that's a hilarious take on the quote from another comment.
Ann, Liz Cheney is a fine-looking woman of keen intellect and wicked debating skills. She has the "gravitas" that many seem to think that Sarah Palin lacks. But she can be tarred with the "Beltway" label that puts so many folks off and she, as you point out, does not have the passionate support that Palion does.
I had to spend a moment beating my head against the wall after reading Ann's quote from the article on extending national monument status to ANWR. As much as I like the area, it is bizarre to call it spectacular. The quote from the green Republican is frustrating. I AM a person of faith, and it is not an article of that faith to object to harmless extraction of resources that God gave our nation so that we might not be at the mercy of hostile foreign powers.
I can hardly wait for the firestorm from the Left over last night's episode of Palin's travelogue. Animal rightists will be weeping over what they consider the murder of a beautiful animal. The nit-pickers (an innate trait of the lefties) will be screaming about Palin taking so many shots, or the fact that her father provided the rifles. About that rifle issue, her father is adored and respected, and Palin yields to him as a dutiful daughter making him feel important. It was his error in not having the rifles sighted in properly, or just an accident in the scopes getting jostled in transit, that caused the aimpoint error. And Sarah could have brought her own rifle, but that would have taken away from the family bonding involved. I was very pleased with the show, as a hunter, as a Republican and as a Sarah-phile.
Posted by: Mark Folkestad | December 06, 2010 at 06:55 AM
Oops. Lack of sleep shows in my keying in "Palion" instead of Palin. On the other hand, since she is something of a lioness, perhaps my typo is appropriate.
Posted by: Mark Folkestad | December 06, 2010 at 06:57 AM
You're Tom Perriello of VA-5. One-term Tom, lame duck. What do you do as your country's economy crumples against a steel wall like in one of those slow-mo crash test films? That's right. You introduce your very own Campus Sexual Violence Elimination Act!
Because everyone knows that at this time in U.S. history, it is important that Congress involve itself in the dating lives of twenty-year-old couples. Date rape and assault between boyfriends and girlfriends at colleges is a terrible scourge! Congress must act!
Tom's working on his self-esteem. It's all about Tom. His term always was about Tom. No one could bloviate about nothing at a town hall better than Tom. And now Tom's wounded ego needs some help, a little "I made a difference" perfume. But you can't cover the stink. He voted for the crap which killed our recovery. He made a difference alright, and we kicked him out of office quicker than the bouncers at Cleo's local dives kick him to the curb on Saturdays.
Posted by: Jim Ryan | December 06, 2010 at 07:20 AM
Palin must be the first American to use running for president to successfully launch a career as a reality TV star. That's entertainment, indeed... Jesse Jackson must be beside himself with envy...
Posted by: bunkerbuster | December 06, 2010 at 07:25 AM
Here is a great old post on ANWR with pictures.
Thanks for the music video links mockmook!
Posted by: Janet | December 06, 2010 at 07:40 AM
Ann, Liz Cheney is a fine-looking woman of keen intellect and wicked debating skills. She has the "gravitas" that many seem to think that Sarah Palin lacks. But she can be tarred with the "Beltway" label that puts so many folks off and she, as you point out, does not have the passionate support that Palion does.
Well we could imagine that Palin chooses not to run but rather endorse Liz.
Posted by: Jane (sit on the couch or save your country) | December 06, 2010 at 08:04 AM
Bunkerbuster, Obama's entire 2008 campaign was one big reality show TV star operation, complete with reports of Obama at the health club, Obama dissing a relative as a typical white person, Obama dismissing a female reporter as sweetie, Obama speaking surrounded by fake Greek columns, Obama's adoring fans lapping up his nonsense about stopping the rise of the oceans, Obama the world reality show celebrity speaking in Europe, and the Obama symbols, T-shirts and other products everywhere. Obama's campaign skillfully manipulated the cult of celebrity and fake intimacy that is the staple of many so-called reality based shows. I look forward to your hard hitting analysis of how Obama's slick cult of personality campaign (which reached its height when Obama objected to answering too many questions from reporters [you know how charismatic personalities are above such mundate matters]) is inconsistent with serious governance.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | December 06, 2010 at 08:18 AM
It is ridiculous that we don't see stuff like is shown in WeaselZippers video every night on the news.
Amen to this sentiment. So many great efforts by our military in Iraq & Afghanistan are just ignored. Our media has stolen heroic individuals & moments from this generation. It is too sad.
I used to print off stories reported on the internet of lots of great things happening in Iraq & Afghanistan....never saw them in the newspaper. One lousy Abu Ghraib (that was already being prosecuted) trumped hundreds of wonderful, heart lifting efforts that could inspire ALL Americans.
I personally sent boxes of school supplies to 3 Marines setting up a school. That is just one tiny example.
The left should be ashamed for not helping to bring freedom to the people living in these countries ruled by hate-filled thugs.
It is like the left believes in a caste system....every little group needs to stay in their place...frozen in time...never exposed to new & better ideas.
Posted by: Janet | December 06, 2010 at 08:19 AM
Obama's entire 2008 campaign was one big reality show
Sooooo true TC!!! Well said.
Posted by: Janet | December 06, 2010 at 08:21 AM
Liz does do to the rest of the wayward panel, of Fox News, what Sarah did to the Caribou, yet another lie put forth by Shushannah Walshe
in the DB, that GrandPa Grizzley didn'tsupport
her,
Posted by: narciso | December 06, 2010 at 08:29 AM
A very interesting and more optimistic report on the Me than we are used to hearing with a caveat--a warning from Israel of the strategic danger posed by the international move to delegitimize it and one from the Egyptian foreign minister that if the enemies of peace are allowed to paint this as a war between the Moslems and the Jews, the peace efforts by countries like Jordan and Egypt will be unable to contain them.
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=3278
Posted by: Clarice | December 06, 2010 at 08:35 AM
She did manage the Middle East portfolio in the second Bush term, which is akin to trying
to cull the herd of Arabist proteges of Charles Freeman
Posted by: narciso | December 06, 2010 at 08:58 AM
Obama's entire 2008 campaign was one big reality show TV star operation
Imagine the embarrassment of falling for that. In another year 90% of the democrats won't admit voting for him.
Posted by: Jane (sit on the couch or save your country) | December 06, 2010 at 09:26 AM
Where is Frau?
This morning our children our celebrating Nikolaus.
">http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/history/mnstatehistory/images/st_nick.gif">
St. Nikolaus Day (Nikolaustag)
Bungduster, Did you get a stick? :-(
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 06, 2010 at 09:38 AM
I think we'll call him Ruprecht from now on.
Posted by: narciso | December 06, 2010 at 09:41 AM
Bungduster, Did you get a stick? :-(
LOL!! Threadkiller! Too funny. Makes me mindful of a super funny Tim Blair post called A Stick Named Pablo. Here's my John F'n Kerry stick.
Posted by: Janet | December 06, 2010 at 09:48 AM
In the same vein 'submitted for your approval'
as Rod Serling would say, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | December 06, 2010 at 09:58 AM
It's like vaudeville, this morning, or they really are auditioning for next week's pieces, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | December 06, 2010 at 10:09 AM
From narciso's 10:09
"“The climate bill is much more important than health care because the climate situation is about life and death whereas the health-care bill was much more limited,” Turner, 72, said."
HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 06, 2010 at 10:12 AM