A film in which Abraham Lincoln is re-imagined as a vampire-hunter? Oh, please. Yet by the end of this NY Times article I was actually looking forward to the movie.
And as if by unearthly providence, later that day I came across an excerpt of a Lincoln speech at Cooper Union, in which he explained the impossibility of compromising with and placating slave-holders:
Let us be diverted by none of those sophistical contrivances wherewith we are so industriously plied and belabored – contrivances such as groping for some middle ground between the right and the wrong, vain as the search for a man who should be neither a living man nor a dead man ...
Whaaaa?!? Lincoln offering undead metaphors, and admitting his failure as a vampire hunter? Now I really have to see the flick.
Mr. Walker — who was cast after the impression he made as another president in the title role of the stage musical “Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson” — said he found Lincoln’s agile, ax-wielding inner killer by drawing on past experience. “I studied ballet,” he said.
You guys will little note nor long remember what I comment about that paragraph, but you can never forget how stupid that paragraph was.
Posted by: bgates | May 10, 2011 at 11:37 PM
Got that book as a birthday gift. Can't read print that small. Somebody please tell me: is it worth getting it (so I can enlarge the font) on the i-Pad Kindle?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 10, 2011 at 11:39 PM
LOL, bgates, 'that is very silly indeed, get on with it'
Posted by: narciso | May 10, 2011 at 11:42 PM
Abe the Vampire Slayer?
Could we bribe TM's wife to burn his copy of the NYTimes before he reads it each day?
Would probably make for fewer but better thread topics.
Posted by: Ignatz | May 10, 2011 at 11:52 PM
Before my local Borders closed, I lolled when I saw the cover of "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies". I'm not sure that the two events weren't unrelated.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 12:26 AM
There's an interesting take on the Vampire meme, '12, (referring to 1812 overture,) thinking of it, as War and Piece, meets Dracula, sort of.
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 01:24 AM
I think the things you covered through the post are quiet impressive, good job and great efforts. I found it very interesting and enjoyed reading all of it...keep it up, lovely job.
Posted by: Ecommerce website developer. | May 11, 2011 at 01:30 AM
Yay Jane,
I'd share a Jail-cell with you anytime!
Posted by: daddy | May 11, 2011 at 03:38 AM
LOL Daddy. The kids thought they were way cool. I missed the unvieling but after the description wish I hadn't.
Posted by: Jane | May 11, 2011 at 04:46 AM
So yesterday, the President joked about those who favor a moat and alligators on the border. Meanwhile at the same time we have drug gangs digging 250 feet long tunnels through solid rock to get drugs across the border to our kids.
So where are the Republicans? They should be screaming YES, Mr. President, we do want moats and alligators to keep the drug gangs from our kids...its the LEAST we can do.
Posted by: Pops | May 11, 2011 at 07:23 AM
bgates: you can never forget how stupid that paragraph was.
Really? Remember Rahm?
Posted by: sbw | May 11, 2011 at 07:29 AM
Good morning.
Posted by: Extraneus | May 11, 2011 at 07:43 AM
I'm thinking Howie Carr isn't a big Mitt fan: http://bostonherald.com/news/columnists/view.bg?&articleid=1337097&format=&page=1&listingType=col#articleFull
Btw in case our friend Mustang shows up, I'm enjoying listening to Sunny Sweeny's "Heartbreaker's Hall of Fame" as I type this.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 07:44 AM
Right, wasn't there a South Africa jihadist, forget the name of the group who was stopped
at the border, some years back, wasn't El shukrijumah, 'Jaafar the pilot' rooting around
in Central America, for a time,
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 07:46 AM
What we don't want at our border Mr. President is a Welcome Mat and a federal credit card.
Posted by: Pops | May 11, 2011 at 07:53 AM
Is it me? I know I haven't had my coffee but what in the world are Jane and Daddy talking about?
Posted by: clarice | May 11, 2011 at 08:03 AM
smuggling illegal chocolate eggs?
Posted by: Chubby | May 11, 2011 at 08:05 AM
Kind of funny that after a week of the adminstration telling us that Pakistan - a backward third world country- should have known they had illegal alien criminals living in their country and they should have done something about it...
to this week when the President must know their are thousands or criminal illegal aliens that he isn't do anything about...
Posted by: Pops | May 11, 2011 at 08:06 AM
I imagine, it was something that Jane found in Paris, that daddy told her about.
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 08:08 AM
BTW, if you have been following the the voter intimidation scandal in Soutbridge (the next town from me) the re-election was held yesterday.
In the November election, the republican Peter Durant won by 1 vote. On the basis of some weird testimony a Judge declared a new primary and election. After the primary, the town manager who works with the town clerk, who is the cousin of the then incumbent, called Eric Holder's office and alleged intimidation.
The allegation was based on the erection of a billboard in town (see at the above link) which the manager alleged constituted "voter intimidation".
This was the same action which resulted in the tea party losing its meeting place as threats were made to pull business from the bank where we met if they continued to lend us the room.
The general, held yesterday was observed by tea partiers and justice department officials. As far as I know no irregularities were reported. Peter Durant, the republican won.
Posted by: Jane (sit on the couch or save your country) | May 11, 2011 at 08:10 AM
It turns out that they got their own version of the Zetas:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1385697/Ilyas-Kashmiri-emerges-dark-horse-Osama-Bin-Laden-Al-Qaeda-leader.html
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 08:12 AM
Abraham Lincoln allready appeared as a 'good guy' fighting evil in Star Trek..The Savage Curtain.
Hope he doesn't get type-cast and branches out. I'd like to see him do an appearance on Doctor Who...
Posted by: Pops | May 11, 2011 at 08:12 AM
Is this the guy you are thinking of, narciso?
That happened in San Diego county.
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 11, 2011 at 08:15 AM
Once again Pops @ 8:06 has the message the Repuke dimwits should be pounding this morning instead of examining their togas for any unsightly blemishes. Ahhh the Duke and Duke corporate culture strikes again.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 08:16 AM
I was thinking more of the person mentioned at
the end here, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 08:27 AM
I could tell you Clarice, but then I'd have to kill you.
BTW I waited to get to the airport to get your magazine and then promptly forgot. I'm really sorry.
Posted by: Jane (sit on the couch or save your country) | May 11, 2011 at 08:33 AM
Don't give it a second thought, Jane.
Posted by: clarice | May 11, 2011 at 08:35 AM
Great story about Durant.Rah rah
Posted by: clarice | May 11, 2011 at 08:37 AM
My polite demeanor prevents from fully expressing the way I feel about Bin Laden pere, castigating us, for the handling of his 'old man'
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 08:42 AM
Just another reminder, of how Panetta isn't really all that,
http://swampland.time.com/2011/05/04/did-torture-get-the-us-osama-bin-laden/
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 09:05 AM
Hope he doesn't get type-cast and branches out. I'd like to see him do an appearance on Doctor Who...
LUN -- apparently he's been in one episode on TV and multiple times in other media.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | May 11, 2011 at 09:12 AM
Don't you mean Bin Laden fils, narc?
Laura Ingraham: Tim Geithner and Hillary are the twin towers of disaster on dealing with China.
Iowahawk: Newt loves America until it gets cancer.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 09:21 AM
I was reminded by that earlier link, how dissapointed the Democrats were, that the
interrogation tapes weren't available, as they
could have used them, to go after the interrogators and try to incite the Moslem world further.
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 09:22 AM
My polite demeanor prevents from fully expressing the way I feel about Bin Laden pere, castigating us, for the handling of his 'old man'
Don't jihadis typically say they're in it "to the death"? Sounds like we gave bin Laden what he wanted and the castigator should instead be thanking us for services rendered.
Posted by: PD | May 11, 2011 at 09:23 AM
until it gets cancer
Wasn't that My Friends?
Posted by: PD | May 11, 2011 at 09:24 AM
True that, Captain, I'm reminded PD, of how Efraim Bamaca, the wannabe guerilla of the late 90s, wanted to be like 'Che' then his wife complained to Bianca Jagger, who relayed
her concerns to Torricelli, 'be careful what
you wish for'
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 09:29 AM
Minus 12 at Raz today; 48% overall.
Posted by: Dubious but Horribly Dishonest | May 11, 2011 at 09:31 AM
PD, I don't know about McVain, although I'm always prepared to believe the worst about him, but it appears the eye of the Newt was the victim of some shoddy MFM reporting which amazingly always seems to skew against Repubs:
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 09:35 AM
Minus 12
The bounce has fully ebbed.
Posted by: PD | May 11, 2011 at 09:42 AM
Yes, and that account first came from David Osborne, if he hadn't the second affair, while
denouncing Clinton, I would have given him the benefit of the doubt, but his flacking for
Freddie Mac, his 'date' with Boxer, for AGW
are more concerning.
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 09:42 AM
This:
fairly begs for: "aside from that Mrs. Lincoln, how'd you like the play?" But I think the best part is vampire slave-traders. Not sure what's worse, them or Nazi zombies . . . but anyway, what's not to hate?Posted by: Cecil Turner | May 11, 2011 at 09:43 AM
Yes the cuddle couch AGW session with Pelosi Galore was whoring of a different kind; and the WSJ has come down repeatedly on his ethanol pandering.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 09:44 AM
Time for Newt to move on. Any GOP president would be well-advised to listen to his ideas; the trick is in knowing which ones need to be rejected out of hand.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 11, 2011 at 09:45 AM
The bounce has fully ebbed.
Really? On the radio they were desperately fluffing The Highest Approval Ratings Ever Recorded or something like that.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | May 11, 2011 at 09:47 AM
Good morning. I am seeing headlines on the web that John Kerry is going to go talk to the Pakistanis.
Makes you feel sorry for Pakistan.
Posted by: centralcal | May 11, 2011 at 09:47 AM
Rob C: you must be talking about the AP poll. Jim Geraghty at NRO and ED Morrissey at HotAir are all over it. From Geraghty:
With a poll sample that has a 17 percentage point margin in favor of the Democrats, is anyone surprised that these results look like a David Axelrod dream?
Posted by: centralcal | May 11, 2011 at 09:52 AM
Again I'm thinking the hero of Abbottabad's internals must be a disaster if he's trying to rally the base with a loser issue like immigration reform to distract attention from everything else.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 09:55 AM
cc -- I figured it was something like that.
But what the morning commuters heard was not the horrible internals, but how Everyone Loves Obama.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | May 11, 2011 at 09:59 AM
Cleveland Plain Dealer:
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 11, 2011 at 10:05 AM
Jacobsen points out how Obama's jab against Fox was just another 'bitter clinger' moment
of illumination.
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 10:20 AM
Makes you feel sorry for Pakistan.
Maybe they need a botox refill.
Posted by: PD | May 11, 2011 at 10:21 AM
DoT
I thought the ending of Vampire Hunter was a little weak compared to the rest of the book.
Posted by: Mark in Houston | May 11, 2011 at 10:22 AM
But it does not mention
... the administration's policy of shutting down domestic production?
Posted by: PD | May 11, 2011 at 10:23 AM
Are there really that many motorists who watch the commodities markets closely enough to know about recent spikes and volatility, as opposed to just higher prices? And does it make sense that these same people -- expert enough to closely follow the commodities markets -- are also the people who darkly suspect that "somebody is gouging them"?
Posted by: Extraneus | May 11, 2011 at 10:28 AM
Thanks Mark. I think I'll wait a while and listen for a little more buzz.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 11, 2011 at 10:28 AM
That is the point of the exercise, Ext, strangle independent oil production, fatten
the profit margins of the majors, for a time,kill off Alaska's 'golden goose,' as a bonus prize.
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 10:30 AM
Are there really that many motorists who watch the commodities markets closely enough to know about recent spikes and volatility, as opposed to just higher prices?
I'm sure that Muffer Stalin-Rodham is avidly reading the WSJ and poised to make another killing in commodities trading.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 10:34 AM
David Bernstein at Volokh:
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 11, 2011 at 10:38 AM
I am going to say something nice.
It looks like Michelle has gotten her arms back in shape.
Posted by: MayBee | May 11, 2011 at 10:44 AM
Alligator are so passee, when you can have 'sharks with lasers' I know they are not fresh water, but we can make accomodations.
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 10:49 AM
I went to a taping of the X Factor the other day. The comedian doing the warm up act asked people in the audience who had the X Factor. Justin Bieber, Michael Jackson, people said. Then someone answered "Obama has the X Factor". I can report that even in LA, the audience response was decidedly mixed. Some applause, some boos, lotsa groans.
Posted by: MayBee | May 11, 2011 at 10:58 AM
Bull sharks might be able to do the job.
Posted by: Jim Miller | May 11, 2011 at 11:01 AM
Extraneous,
The current Short Term Energy Outlook (prepared by the Federal government) points to the President
as the main villain in the conspiracy to immiserate motorists through robbery at the pump. The Muddle is bright enough to understand that actions taken to limit supply will drive prices up and they're bright enough to place the blame in the Oval Office. This time, that's where it belongs - even Uncle Sugar himself says so.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 11, 2011 at 11:03 AM
What's the X Factor, MayBee? I know it's a show like American Idol, but I couldn't find what it means to "have" it, although I couldn't agree more that Obama doesn't.
Posted by: Extraneus | May 11, 2011 at 11:04 AM
Yet more commentary from the poet laureate:
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/05/10/obama-white-house-invites-racist-misogynist-pro-cop-killer-rapper-to-evening-of-poetry/
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 11:04 AM
Going back to the movie: I don't see many, but I might make an exception for this one. And as I said in my own post, it does supply an explanation for John Wilkes Booth.
DoT - FWIW, more than half (126 of 244) of the reviewers at Amazon give the book a 5 star rating.
Posted by: Jim Miller | May 11, 2011 at 11:06 AM
I'll read the book, and report back, the things I do, LOL.
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 11:09 AM
Ex-
The "X Factor" is that extra sumthin sumthin that makes someone a star.
Maybe we should call it the Ex factor
Posted by: MayBee | May 11, 2011 at 11:22 AM
Question for the JOM attorneys: How frustrating is it that your profession has been coopted by the lefties as the means to thwart the will of the people?
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 11:24 AM
lol. Yeah, that's exactly what we should call it.
Posted by: Extraneus | May 11, 2011 at 11:25 AM
Raz on May 2:
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 11, 2011 at 11:30 AM
31.7% say they’re not affiliated with either major party.
Another Duke and Duke success story.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 11:37 AM
"How frustrating is it that your profession has been coopted by the lefties as the means to thwart the will of the people?"
Were you alive in the '60's?
Posted by: MarkO | May 11, 2011 at 11:40 AM
Gasoline prices will remain high through 2012, the U.S. Energy Information Administration says.
The flooding in the gulf will make at least 3 refineries unusable which will cause another spike - assuming it proceeds as expected.
Posted by: Jane (sit on the couch or save your country) | May 11, 2011 at 11:42 AM
Meanwhile Syria is 'defriending' scads of people in Homs, Bill Richardson?? will be along with a strongly worded statement, like
the uber PC missives in 'Demolition Man, 'tell
the maniac, in a calm clear voice, to desist
immediately.
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM
Mark, I was alive in the 50's. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make because the pendulum swung about as far to the left as it has in my lifetime in the 60's; ie LBJ's landslide victory over Goldwater. Also the libs in the 60s had their own civil war to deal with and there was a much higher percentage of lefties who believed the Constitution didn't need to be completely remade.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 11:51 AM
The whole politicians worrying about obesity is starting to piss me off.
I proposed we have a political obesity index and start charging politicians for the obesity of their budgets.
Every percentage point they are over spending, we deduct 1% of their pay, 10 percent deficit, 10% cut in pay..etc.
I am so sick of politicians that think it is their jobs to run our lives, rather then do the job we pay them for so we can run our own lives.
Of course we would have to cut Obamas pay by about 60% per year.
I am convinced the only way to fix this mess it to NOT raise the debt ceiling, or raise it 200 Billion with the caveat that that is the last raise and starting with the 2012 budget, you better be in balance.
The Republicans need to understand that it is deficits that keep liberals in office. They get to spend money to get re-elected without the people enduring the hardship of the tax rates it would require to support the level of spending they want.
If the Federal government couldn't raise the debt, they would be forced to either cut spending or pass a huge tax increase to continue the liberal spending.
Borrowing is the only thing keeping liberalism afloat.
Posted by: Pops | May 11, 2011 at 11:51 AM
I'm not sure I understand what CH's question means. There have been leftist lawyers since before I was born; I don't notice anything new today.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 11, 2011 at 11:59 AM
I am so sick of politicians that think it is their jobs to run our lives, rather then do the job we pay them for so we can run our own lives.
I think the real problem is that too many "Americans" think it's appropriate to elect a president to run other peoples' lives. The average politician isn't sufficiently motivated to care if people are fat; they're responding to what they hear.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | May 11, 2011 at 12:10 PM
THey are more clearly 'running the asylum'
now, consider the senior partners at Acheson's
old firm 'Covington, Shearman, Wilmer, et al.
Meanwhile the Post doesn't even serve as good
puppy training material:
http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/2011/05/11/website-of-wash-post-editorialist-pronounces-barack-obama-is-dead/#comments
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 12:10 PM
CH. I think that by and large the decisions of the Supreme Court are significantly more conservative (whatever that is) than in the '60's and '70's. If the point is to recognize the corruption of the legal system as it relates to judges and decisional law, I think it just depends on where one might look. There is the poorly names criminal justice system, which generally processes those caught up by the power of the State. Civil cases, including those that make the papers, like the Obamacare case, are greatly influenced by factors such as politics, but there are other issues as well, including the talent of the litigator (that's how the Dodger matter unwound), and the silly mandates to have judges clear their calendars.
I have not been visited by the ghosts of those cases that gave trees standing to sue, but the penumbras, like force, are always with us.
Moreover, one cannot dismiss the effects of judges who pack the intellectual heft of Cleo.
Posted by: MarkO | May 11, 2011 at 12:11 PM
Alligators in Arizona? How silly, everyone knows alligators aren't native to Arizona! He must be thinking about one of those other 57 states. Besides venomous water snakes are much more efficient.
Jane, great news! I hope it was more than a few votes. Welcome home.
Is Howie Carr right? Should Mitt just admit he was wrong or would they hammer him on another flip flop?
Posted by: Rocco | May 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM
I'm not sure I understand what CH's question means. There have been leftist lawyers since before I was born; I don't notice anything new today.
I think the difference is the profession as a whole has internalized the lefts' goals. See also doctors.
Some of this is likely due to institutional capture of professional organizations. Anyone else here ever a member of IEEE? I dropped my membership after years of hearing them repeat the same "solution" to every problem: federal money, federal money, federal money.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | May 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM
"I think the difference is the profession as a whole has internalized the lefts' goals."
This feels like the old debate about whether assholes go to law school or law school produces assholes.
As for me, I decry the false choices.
Posted by: MarkO | May 11, 2011 at 12:17 PM
those cases that gave trees standing to sue
I think the clinically insane William O. Douglas alluded to that possibility at one point, but if there was ever a case that actually allowed such a thing I am unaware of it.
It seems to me that the Warren court started the whole process of radicalizing the profession. It became possible to effect "social change" through litigation, so the usual suspects were attracted.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM
'the rest of the story'
http://bigpeace.com/kschlichter/2011/05/11/the-bin-laden-files-excerpts-from-osamas-captured-diary/
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 12:22 PM
Thanks for the response, Mark; I'm going to take a while to consider everything you wrote before responding further on it.
I guess my biggest gripe is how relentless the left seems to be on pushing their agenda, through any means necessary, and how frustrated I am by the wishy-washiness of the grandees in the Republican party. For example, yesterday's speech by BOzo should've been a treasure trove of dumbass statements to blast him with and put him on the defensive. Yet I don't hear anything from the declared candidates so in essence he's given a pass on it, just like every other thing he does.
I've had it with the spinelessness of the Repukes on being unwilling to confront him on anything. I can't take people with such a lack of urgency seriously.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 12:23 PM
Justice Douglas, dissenting in Sierra Club v. Morton (1972):
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 11, 2011 at 12:23 PM
Exhibit A of McCain family values: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/meghan-mccain-goes-naked-for-racy-skin-cancer-psa/
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 11, 2011 at 12:27 PM
DoT, that still makes me laugh out loud. Not even Wm Van Alstyne could take it seriously.
Posted by: MarkO | May 11, 2011 at 12:29 PM
CH -- that's cold, linking to something like that. I thought you liked us?
Thank goodness the link includes the warning.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | May 11, 2011 at 12:31 PM
Frankly,
I think if we lose on Obamacare it is time to talk about secession.
Posted by: Jane (sit on the couch or save your country) | May 11, 2011 at 12:31 PM
Blast on my iphone:
CME has halted trade on gasoline from a drop in price of 7%.
?
Posted by: glasater | May 11, 2011 at 12:32 PM
So the 4th Circuit panel of two Obama appointees and a Clinton appointee, is going to overturn Henry Hudson's ruling because activity is indistinguishable from inactivity. That's great. It's up to Justice Kennedy, then?
Posted by: Jim Ryan | May 11, 2011 at 12:33 PM
Fun, fun, fun!
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | May 11, 2011 at 12:41 PM
Jim Ryan:
Never fear- the Supremes will slap back Obamacare toute suite.
It's unconstitutional and the lefties know it. It's only a matter of time before SCOTUS confirms it.
As far as responding to Obama and immigration- it was his party and Obama himself who torpedoed President Bush's attempt at reform. Hannity is on it as is O'Reilly. By the number of negative comments after Obama'a speech I think everyone is going to let Obama crash and burn on this one.Repubs just need to refute his lies and focus on the budget which is where Obama is really vulnerable.
Posted by: maryrose | May 11, 2011 at 12:42 PM
They would kick it up to an enbanc hearing, right,
Posted by: narciso | May 11, 2011 at 12:42 PM
Best we can hope for, JimR. And it's a long shot. We need to get Obama out of there in 2012, and that's not looking like a sure thing either.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 11, 2011 at 12:43 PM
Well, there is this.
Posted by: squaredance | May 11, 2011 at 12:47 PM
Has anybody read these NOAA "Catch-Share" regs?
Utterly Soviet. I looked into it after narciso's point to the news story. These fishermen are forbidden to talk about the regs if they are subject to them.
This needs a bigger push out of the shadows.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | May 11, 2011 at 12:49 PM