As Obama enjoys his victory lap following the death of Osama bin Laden, his unrelenting critics can find grist for their mill in this AP tick-tock of the hunt and eventual raid:
By mid-February, the officials were convinced a "high-value target" was hiding in the compound. President Barack Obama wanted to take action.
"They were confident and their confidence was growing: 'This is different. This intelligence case is different. What we see in this compound is different than anything we've ever seen before,'" John Brennan, the president's top counterterrorism adviser, said Monday. "I was confident that we had the basis to take action."
Options were limited. The compound was in a residential neighborhood in a sovereign country. If Obama ordered an airstrike and bin Laden was not in the compound, it would be a huge diplomatic problem. Even if Obama was right, obliterating the compound might make it nearly impossible to confirm bin Laden's death.
Said Brennan: "The president had to evaluate the strength of that information, and then made what I believe was one of the most gutsiest calls of any president in recent memory."
Obama tapped two dozen members of the Navy's elite SEAL Team Six to carry out a raid with surgical accuracy.
As they explain, bombing an upscale suburb of Islamabad was not a live diplomatic option. That means the choices were a manned raid, or continued dithering while waiting for more intel.
But dithering may not have been an option either - it was just last week that Wikileaks dumped some info that can be pieced together to lead back to the compound in Abbottabad:
Buried in a document from 2008 released by WikiLeaks last week are notes from the interrogation of a Libyan, Abu al-Libi, who had apparently been with Bin Laden in Afghanistan.
According to the document, Libi fled to Peshawar in Pakistan and was living there in 2003 when he was asked to become one of Bin Laden's messengers. The document says: "In July 2003, detainee received a letter from [Bin Laden's] designated courier, Maulawi Abd al-Khaliq Jan, requesting detainee take on the responsibility of collecting donations, organising travel and distributing funds for families in Pakistan. [Bin Laden] stated detainee would be the official messenger between [Bin Laden] and others in Pakistan. In mid-2003, detainee moved his family to Abbottabad (Pakistan) and worked between Abbottabad and Peshawar."
Hmm - one would have presumed that Osama et al had thought through the implications of the al-Libbi capture. Would they really have first learned from WikiLeaks that al-Libbi might have been cooperating with his interrogators? Then again, maybe they had persuaded themselves that the trail back to Osma had gone cold. Still, seeing Osama's home base cited in a CIA memo might have re-opened an old debate at Osama's headquarters and reinforced a faction arguing that it was time to move on.
Tricky. I can imagine that advisors in the White House were very worried that these leaks would prompt the departure of whatever HVT was within the compound. And if it were subsequently leaked that Obama lost an HVT to WikiLeaks while waiting for more intel... one can ony imagine the pressures on the man with the loneliest job in the world.
READING THE BODY LANGUAGE: The Times describes the study of the bombing option:
Mr. Gates was skeptical about a helicopter assault, calling it risky, and instructed military officials to look into aerial bombardment using smart bombs. But a few days later, the officials returned with the news that it would take some 32 bombs of 2,000 pounds each. And how could the American officials be certain that they had killed Bin Laden?
“It would have created a giant crater, and it wouldn’t have given us a body,” said one American intelligence official.
I am just guessing that this option was prepared by a group that favored another course. 32 bombs?
HMM: Per the Times, the name of the courier mentioned by al-Libi was probably false:
After Mr. Libi was captured in May 2005 and turned over to the C.I.A., he too was asked. He denied knowing Mr. Kuwaiti and gave a different name for Bin Laden’s courier, whom he called Maulawi Jan. C.I.A. analysts would never find such a person and eventually concluded that the name was Mr. Libi’s invention, the official recalled.
Yet he gave the right city for his own location.
So should we start circulating the meme that if it weren't for Wikileaks, Preznit Present would still be dithering? That works for me on a lot of levels.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2011 at 11:51 AM
one can ony imagine the pressures on the man with the loneliest job in the world.
Tear jerker.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 11:52 AM
I can think of a few lonelier jobs for him than his present one.
Posted by: lyle | May 03, 2011 at 12:00 PM
Not to diminish the bravery of the SEALs, because everything they do is incredible, but this raid didn't shape up to the be the hardest on record. They knew only 4 males were on property and at least one of them (OBL) was a girlie man. The WH is putting out a bunch of smoke and mirrors on how long this took, but I think it was over in about five minutes. Sure, the in and out of Pakistan in risky as are potential boobytraps, but from Obama's perspective, the raid seemed like a fairly easy call--and a fairly safe one. Of course the MSM is hyping it as much as possible to make Prez nine-iron look courageous.
Posted by: Skypester | May 03, 2011 at 12:00 PM
There's still no disputing that Obama took a huge risk in ordering this raid. There were lots of ways it could have gone wrong, perhaps badly wrong, and had that happened he would have been toast.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 03, 2011 at 12:02 PM
--So should we start circulating the meme that if it weren't for Wikileaks, Preznit Present would still be dithering?--
Well, if we don't you know cleo will.
Posted by: Ignatz | May 03, 2011 at 12:04 PM
True, DoT. OTOH you have to agree the wikileak piece sure made this a do it soon proposition and someone explained to him that it was his last chance to pick up some points on the board.
Posted by: clarice | May 03, 2011 at 12:06 PM
Iggy, I was thinking of it more in making Assange a target of the head-choppers. That soft pencil-neck could probably be sliced through with a butter knife.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2011 at 12:10 PM
Something occurred to me after seeing the $1,000,000 castle Osama was living in. What does a $100,000 home look like? A hut?
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 12:12 PM
Top is re-tweeting the best comment:
The best irony of all: Old Osama being “waterboarded” off the USS Carl Vinson into the Arabian Sea
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 12:14 PM
--Iggy, I was thinking of it more in making Assange a target of the head-choppers.--
Too late for that, CH. Cleo has already pronounced Assange responsible for the Arab uprisings which promise to expand the head choppers' power exponentially. On the whole not a bad trade off for 'em, if they're also inhabitants of cleo's alternate universe.
Posted by: Ignatz | May 03, 2011 at 12:14 PM
WaPo poll has Obama up 9 points. Someone at Hot Air: He presided over the killing of Osama bin Laden, and his popularity is only at 56 percent? Seriously? He’s beatable in 2012 after all.
Good point.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 12:21 PM
Obama's calculated the political blowback if the missed opportunity became known was greater than the political blowback from a failure mission. His overriding concern is always how any action will affect him, not what's best for the country.
Posted by: DebinNC | May 03, 2011 at 12:28 PM
WaPo poll has Obama up 9 points.
Also, Sue, we always have to keep in mind that media polls skew heavily to Dems and seldom reflect actual voter breakdowns. That he only picked up 9 pts with biased polling, tells ya something, too.
Posted by: centralcal | May 03, 2011 at 12:36 PM
... and ...
Posted by: Neo | May 03, 2011 at 12:44 PM
There's still no disputing that Obama took a huge risk in ordering this raid. There were lots of ways it could have gone wrong, perhaps badly wrong, and had that happened he would have been toast.
Therefore, the panic in the WH over his falling poll numbers must be quite extreme.
Posted by: Extraneus | May 03, 2011 at 12:45 PM
Damn I hope this isn't real. It shows the SEAL too clearly.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 12:46 PM
Okay, the wound is over the wrong eye. Fake.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 12:48 PM
This is what real CIA agents were doing while Valerie Plame was sending her husband on free missions and whining about someone asking her questions.
Posted by: MayBee | May 03, 2011 at 12:48 PM
The only calculus Obama made was whether having the intel and doing nothing ala Clinton and having the military leak it would be more damaging than doing a raid and having it fail. The calculus of actually doing a good thing for the country by getting OBL never entered the equation.
Real leaders lead at great cost to themselves, he ain't no real leader.
Posted by: Stephanie | May 03, 2011 at 12:52 PM
This is what real CIA agents were doing while Valerie Plame was sending her husband on free missions and whining about someone asking her questions.
Posted by: MayBee | May 03, 2011 at 12:48 PM
I nominate for comment of the day.
Posted by: Ranger | May 03, 2011 at 12:53 PM
Anyone catch Bob Shrum last night on Kudlow
fellatingpraising Obama on his towering victory, his defining moment and comparing him to FDR's winning WWII (I know) and Kennedy's Bay of Pigs?Kudlow offered up Reagan winning the Cold War and W's actions after 9/11. Shrum? "Meh."
Posted by: lyle | May 03, 2011 at 12:55 PM
Sue | May 03, 2011 at 12:46 PM
If this picture is real, that may be someone aboard the ship. Just a thought.
Posted by: Agent J. (formally known as "J".. | May 03, 2011 at 12:58 PM
Wait a second, lyle; was Shrum actually presenting the Bay of Pigs as a positive thing? I knew he was an idiot from his sterling Presidential campaign record, which Duke and Duke can only regard with unfettered admiration; but this puts him in Ed Schultz fractured history tales territory.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2011 at 01:04 PM
If that's what Shrum said, my guess is that he meant to refer to the Cuban missile crisis, in which the media portrayed JFK as having the combined virtues of the Holy Ghost, the Twelve Apostles and El Cid.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 03, 2011 at 01:14 PM
I nominate for comment of the day.
Second.
Posted by: Porchlight | May 03, 2011 at 01:16 PM
CH: yes. Apparently damn near starting nuclear war is a positive thing.
I sure hope he has a prominent voice in Bam's re-election campaign.
Posted by: lyle | May 03, 2011 at 01:17 PM
You're probably right, DoT; I was thinking that when you were posting it. Yeah the MFM fluffing was pretty disgusting; leaving aside that he almost got us all blown up, JFK sold out the intermediate range missiles in Europe and Turkey. Fortunately in the long term, the latter didn't make a difference.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2011 at 01:20 PM
(I only know about National Guard flag patches, not sure about any other branch of service. But that does look like a NG velcro on/off patch, which are backwards, not forwards like the picture.)
The flag patch on the soldier's/sailor's sleeve is not backwards, so the photo may be reversed.Posted by: cathyf | May 03, 2011 at 01:22 PM
Wapo bump due mainly to war on terror approval up. No change in other areas. Terrorism will not be Top 3 issue in 2012 election.
Wapo:
"In the immediate aftermath of the targeted killing of Osama bin Laden, President Obama’s approval rating has jumped higher, with big increases in the number of Americans giving him high marks on dealing with terrorism and the situation in Afghanistan.
But the new poll, conducted Monday evening by The Washington Post and the Pew Research Center, also finds virtually no movement in Obama’s numbers when it comes to handling the economy. That suggests that success on one front — even one as important as the death of the mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks — might not translate easily to other areas.
Overall, 56 percent of those polled say they approve of the way Obama is handling his job as president, an increase of nine percentage points over April polls by Post-ABC News and Pew. "
"Bush got an identical 10-point boost among independents in December 2003 [Hussein capture]. For Bush, that lift proved short-lived, with the entire increase gone within six weeks."
Posted by: Harry P | May 03, 2011 at 01:30 PM
Terrorism will not be Top 3 issue in 2012 election.
Let's hope not, anyway. (knock wood)
Posted by: Porchlight | May 03, 2011 at 01:35 PM
Saw this from Insty. Geography class at UCLA, predicted with 88.9% certainty that OBL was hiding out in Abbottabad, Pakistan. LUN
Posted by: Jack is Back! | May 03, 2011 at 01:46 PM
In the event he is not re-elected, I hope there will be a viral YouTube of Baba Wawa and the slut Behar beclowning themselves yesterday.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 03, 2011 at 01:52 PM
If terrorism is a big issue due to another attack, does the capture accrete to the benefit of Obama or not?
ISTM that the capture is incidental in the WOT and that the policy decisions that are made and continue to be made is the sticking point. If the administration keeps leading through weakness and undermining the war and Holder keeps doing stupid things, the errors of the dems are highlighted in big honking neon and ongoing terrorism is a fatal blow to dems.
If, however, they follow the GWB footprints and marginalize the Kucinich's and the far left fringe, it is a big issue, but any new terror attacks don't hurt the dems. By usurping GWBs decisions when convenient, it seems to me that the terrorism issue is blunted vis a vis the election as they can point and say we did x and ignore their historical record. I don't see the republicans gaining much traction in saying 'let's change teams even though they are doing what we did.'
Now, if the dems continue in their stupid policies, all hell will reign on them.
What I'm worried about is their appropriating and using the WOT to undermine capitalism and liberty to continue the long march. If we get another attack, there will be calls to 'do something,' and I don't trust this lot to 'do something' without it also benefiting them politically. Think Citizens United in a WOT context. Never let a crisis go to waste.
Posted by: Stephanie | May 03, 2011 at 01:53 PM
I admit I'm a cowboy. Actually I tend to brag about it, but this was not a hard call at that point.
"Obama took SIXTEEN HOURS to make up his mind about Bin Laden mission"
From the Mail Online and I would provide a link if I had any clue.
Posted by: MarkO | May 03, 2011 at 01:58 PM
Geography class at UCLA, predicted with 88.9% certainty that OBL was hiding out in Abbottabad, Pakistan. LUN
Well, not quite that accurate. Per the original article (LUN):
"According to a probabilistic model they created, there was an 88.9% chance that bin Laden was hiding out in a city less than 300 km from his last known location in Tora Bora: a region that included Abbottabad, Pakistan, where he was killed last night. "
So they narrowed it down to an area of 282,744 square kilometers or 108,686 square miles.
Posted by: Woo M | May 03, 2011 at 02:02 PM
“If we had the opportunity to take him [bin Laden] alive, we would have done that,” said John Brennan, national security advisor to the president. But as they had thought might happen, bin Laden resisted, a fire fight occurred, and because of the administration’s determination to not “put our people at risk,” bin Laden was killed.
The say UBL threw a pillow.
Posted by: MarkO | May 03, 2011 at 02:03 PM
Just paste it into the box above the Post and Preview buttons, MarkO. Or even right into your comment.
Posted by: Extraneus | May 03, 2011 at 02:04 PM
Interesting, Jack, but there has been a big walkback from the story. They only predicted the likely geographical area by distance, and that broad geographical area included Abbottabad.
Posted by: PaulL | May 03, 2011 at 02:04 PM
Somehow, I think Osama would have preferred being waterboarded.
I think KSM, Al-Libi and the other waterboarded would choose Bush's waterboard, over Obamas hot lead to the skull technique.
I would consider two bullets to the head to be torture, not exactly protective custody.
I still don't understand why the seals, once they identified Bin Laden, didn't withdraw to the compaound entrance and wait for the proper legal authorities to come arrest Osama.
How else was Eric Holder going to call Osama as a character witness at KSM's trial?
Posted by: Pops | May 03, 2011 at 02:05 PM
Thus far the oaf Brennan has had two revisions forced upon his account: Obama was in fact unarmed, and no woman was used as a shield.
The former point makes no difference at all to me, nor do I care one whit whether the SEALs' orders were to kill on sight or to capture if possible. Unless the guy immediately prostrated himself with his hands behind his back and started begging for mercy, he was gonna get shot anyway. Can you imagine being in a dark room with a psychotic mass murderer and giving him the benefit of the doubt?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 03, 2011 at 02:09 PM
Right, Pops, they have a police station nearby, there must be a courthouse in the area, to get a magistrate.
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2011 at 02:09 PM
"Obama was in fact unarmed,..."
But he did have his golf clubs with him and those spiky shoes.
Posted by: Kenny H | May 03, 2011 at 02:12 PM
I don't care if he was armed or not. As someone pointed out yesterday, he needed killin' and I'm pleased as punch my SEALs did the killin'. Panetta says neither he nor Obama saw the killin' so odds are Brennan didn't either. Our counter-terrorism chief in action, so to speak.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 02:20 PM
Boston Police Twitter:
It was reported yesterday that Brown is going to spend his next National Guard training stint in Afghanistan.Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 03, 2011 at 02:22 PM
I must admit I wondered about Osama using a woman as a shield. He really was known as a warrior when fighting the Russians.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 02:24 PM
Also found in MA AG Marsha Coakley's office; initial tests indicate that it's not dangerous.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 03, 2011 at 02:24 PM
Why is the media calling the Abbottabad OBL compound a "mansion?" Yeah, the walls for privacy took up a lot of space, the actual house structure not so large. The house inside, as Clarice indicated earlier this morning, looks like a dump. In one of the bloody room photos, there is a wooden daybed with ratty, holey, yellowed foam rubber. Who started all this "luxury" nonsense?
I notice in the ABC film clip what appears to be a bunch of medicine and prescription bottles on top of a shelf or dresser. Wonder if that was OBL's bedroom?
Posted by: centralcal | May 03, 2011 at 02:32 PM
Obama is such a sissy, he can't even make a decision to release a photo of bin Laden's corpse. Gates and the military must have had to drag him kicking and screaming into that situation room as the attack went down.
Posted by: Barbara | May 03, 2011 at 02:40 PM
Whoever was the contractor, did a little tipping in the till, or it could be designed
by those masonic architects.
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2011 at 02:41 PM
Thanks Ex. Here's more about throwing the pillow:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42882664/ns/world_news-death_of_bin_laden/
Posted by: MarkO | May 03, 2011 at 02:41 PM
Posted by: cathyf | May 03, 2011 at 02:41 PM
IT WORKED. Watch out world.
Posted by: MarkO | May 03, 2011 at 02:42 PM
Early accounts had a different man, not OBL, hiding behind a woman IIRC.
Posted by: Porchlight | May 03, 2011 at 02:47 PM
Gates and the military must have had to drag him kicking and screaming into that situation room as the attack went down.
From the photos, he sure didn't look like he wanted to be in there.
Posted by: Porchlight | May 03, 2011 at 02:47 PM
I just read elsewhere that some of bin Laden's minor children were in the room along with his wife.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 02:48 PM
"I just read elsewhere that some of bin Laden's minor children were in the room along with his wife."
There's a line in "Lonesome Dove" that applies to that.
Posted by: MarkO | May 03, 2011 at 02:50 PM
Mark, what line would that be? I thought I was very obsessive about Lonesome Dove but I'm drawing a blank.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2011 at 02:56 PM
The story of UBL’s end appears to keep changing.
Now, UBL’s wife didn’t die, they got the name of the dead son wrong too. It even appears that UBL didn’t have a gun, but was “putting up resistance”. What did he do ? … attack the Seals with a pointy stick ?? .. a banana ?
Did the Seals gun down US public enemy #1 like a common dog ?
This is getting worse than the “Jessica Lynch” urban legend.
Posted by: Neo | May 03, 2011 at 02:57 PM
Here again in centralcal's picture from the other thread - His little pin-head, his large ears,
Posted by: Janet | May 03, 2011 at 02:59 PM
WH corrects Brennan. In another article Brennan says the SEALS were wearing helmet cameras...that his info comes from watching the raid and other reports, but noted helpfully "I wasn't there" (heh).
Posted by: DebinNC | May 03, 2011 at 03:00 PM
Maybe a passion fruit, Neo, btw, does this indicate one two many concussions without a helmet:
http://myespn.go.com/s/conversations/show/story/6471433
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2011 at 03:01 PM
Heckuva job Brenny.
Posted by: sbw | May 03, 2011 at 03:03 PM
Page 631:
Call was thinking of Jake--that a man who had ridden with them so long could let such a thing happen. Of course he was outnumbered, but it was no excuse. He could have fought or run, once he saw the caliber of his companions.
I know obsession. It's my friend.
Posted by: MarkO | May 03, 2011 at 03:04 PM
For DoT from Jim Treacher comments via Insty:
"jackw3526
The best irony of all: Old Osama being “waterboarded” off the USS Carl Vinson into the Arabian Sea!"
Posted by: Frau Blide | May 03, 2011 at 03:06 PM
Wonder if the body was "eased into the sea" from the flight deck.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 03, 2011 at 03:07 PM
From MarkO's link:
Let me get this straight. According to the MSM, Obama has big brass ones because he decided to go ahead with the raid. But now he can't decide what to do with the photo, because he's concerned about
being "inflammatory."
Seems to me that killing a guy has to be more "inflammatory" than releasing a photo of a guy after you've killed him.
So which is it - is Obama brave or not?
The only way to resolve the apparent conflict is to conclude that Obama just does what his advisors tell him to do. They already told him to sign off on the raid but they have not yet made the decision as to what to do with the photo.
BTW Carney is an ass.
Posted by: Porchlight | May 03, 2011 at 03:07 PM
--Here again in centralcal's picture from the other thread - His little pin-head, his large ears--
Is that the Bat-cape he's wearing?
Posted by: Ignatz | May 03, 2011 at 03:12 PM
Why the hell didn't this administration have a story ready? Did they not think anyone would ask questions? Good grief.
Next thing you know, Holder is going to be pressing charges against my SEALs.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 03:12 PM
Ignatz,
He is getting his hair trimmed, while sitting on the little board that the barber places across the arms to raise the wee little up.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 03:14 PM
Shoot. Messing up my own snarc...wee little "one" up.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 03:15 PM
I should have used "won" not "one". There is a reason I'm not a stand up comedic. Or bgates.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 03:15 PM
Ahhh Jake Spoon. I liked Gus's comment about him best to Lorena (paraphrasing): Jake's a leaky bucket to put your hopes in.
I still consider the miniseries to be one of the best things ever done on tv.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2011 at 03:16 PM
Whatever ceremony occurred on deck before OBL was eased into the sea took 40 minutes. I'd like to see the video or at least see a full description of exactly what took up 40 min.
Posted by: DebinNC | May 03, 2011 at 03:18 PM
We are soon going to find out that the Osama's wife shot him. ::sigh:: Obama is really not up to this. Scary, huh?
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2011 at 03:19 PM
I didn't watch the miniseries under a standing order to see nothing I've read, but you make me reconsider.
I still preach to my kids from the Book of Lonesome Dove. Chapter and verse.
Posted by: MarkO | May 03, 2011 at 03:19 PM
I'd like to see the video or at least see a full description of exactly what took up 40 min.
I just want to know if any of our service members were made to stand there and listen respectfully.
Posted by: MayBee | May 03, 2011 at 03:21 PM
Next on the special edition of Cops,live from Abbotabad
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2011 at 03:21 PM
Maybe I should add to my daily recitations, "Obama's a pussy."
Posted by: MarkO | May 03, 2011 at 03:22 PM
The raid took 40 minutes.
The burial ceremony took 40 minutes.
One of those two things should have been much, much shorter than the other.
Posted by: Porchlight | May 03, 2011 at 03:22 PM
I'm trying to figure out how the people who insisted the photos of Abu Gharib be released now insist the death photo of OBL *not* be released.
Posted by: MayBee | May 03, 2011 at 03:24 PM
I still consider the miniseries to be one of the best things ever done on tv.
Outstanding miniseries. Seconded heartily. One of the best cast of ALL time. You won't regret watching it, MarkO. Trust me. You'll be sorry you hadn't done it earlier.
Posted by: lyle | May 03, 2011 at 03:25 PM
Is there anyone here who would hire Carney to be a minor functionary let alone the face of your business?
Posted by: MarkO | May 03, 2011 at 03:26 PM
I'm trying to figure out how the people who insisted the photos of Abu Gharib be released now insist the death photo of OBL *not* be released.
You're on a roll lately, MB. Yes, it is a wonder, huh?
Posted by: lyle | May 03, 2011 at 03:27 PM
I wouldn't hire Carney to BE a carney.
Posted by: lyle | May 03, 2011 at 03:29 PM
This video shows the body being washed for burial at about 0m:47s.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 03, 2011 at 03:30 PM
I didn't watch the miniseries under a standing order to see nothing I've read, but you make me reconsider.
You should watch it just for Robert Duval. And Tommy Lee Jones hasn't done anything better than his portrayal of Call. The rest of the cast is outstanding as well. Only watch the original; every subsequent sequel and the prequel (although I think McMurtry was involved with that, as he was the original) are substandard.
True story: I taped it without even watching it when it was first broadcast strictly by luck because a buddy of mine recommended it and I just programmed my vcr to record it automatically. I let it just sit for a couple months and, on a whim, started watching it at 10 on a Saturday night. I stayed up until 2 am watching the first 3 episodes and then got up at 7 and watched the final episode; after which I immediately started watching it again. And again.
So yes, I know obsessions.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2011 at 03:31 PM
::too fast for me::
I see Sue beat me to it with the waterboarding quote.
Posted by: Frau Blide | May 03, 2011 at 03:32 PM
--Ignatz,
He is getting his hair trimmed, while sitting on the little board that the barber places across the arms to raise the wee little up.--
--I wouldn't hire Carney to BE a carney.--
Everbody's on a roll.
Posted by: Ignatz | May 03, 2011 at 03:32 PM
The inconsistencies of the left!...an endless list. TK wondered if OBL's koran got damaged? Where is all the hoopin' & hollerin' about that?
Posted by: Janet | May 03, 2011 at 03:36 PM
Tammy Bruce is likewise riffing on Carney's name.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2011 at 03:36 PM
I urge reconsideration of the no-watch policy. Almost every scene in that miniseries looks exactly as I had pictured it while reading, and Tommy Lee Jones are Duvall are sensational.
A man who wouldn't cheat for a poke don't want one bad enough.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 03, 2011 at 03:37 PM
I thought most of the 40 mins in OBL's Abbottabad compound was spent searching for and gathering intelligence.
But you're right .... the burial shouldn't have taken so long, unless they needed to sharpen the knives to hack him into little chum bits.
Posted by: fdcol63 | May 03, 2011 at 03:37 PM
You nailed it, Porchlight!
Posted by: Barbara | May 03, 2011 at 03:37 PM
I strongly dislike the lefty McMurtry and his lefty son James the musician. But I love, love, love Robert Duvall.
Posted by: Porchlight | May 03, 2011 at 03:41 PM
"He (Osama) really was known as a warrior when fighting the Russians. "
Sue, I read somewhere(Charlie Wilson's War or Looming Tower) the Arabs were, by and large, often asked to stay out of the way.
Posted by: Frau Blide | May 03, 2011 at 03:42 PM
A man who wouldn't cheat for a poke don't want one bad enough.
"Lorie, darlin'..." Diane Lane, another perfect cast.
Posted by: lyle | May 03, 2011 at 03:44 PM
Frau, The Looming Tower portrayed OBL in Afghanistan as a bumbler of epic proportions that the jihadis tolerated only because he had so much money.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2011 at 03:45 PM
Weren't we told Obama nixed the option of blowing up the compound because he wanted irrefutable proof OBL was dispatched? And after Dems/msm vilified Bush non-stop for eight years, Obama expects the public to accept without question a "the DNA matches" WH press release? I guess anyone who asks to see evidence it was OBL is a racist "proofer".
Posted by: DebinNC | May 03, 2011 at 03:47 PM
But I love, love, love Robert Duvall.
Hell, I'll throw in another "love." Gus might be his best role ever and that's sayin' something.
Posted by: lyle | May 03, 2011 at 03:47 PM