The Times covers Diana Nyad's latest epic attempt to swim from Cuba to Key West. If successful (IF!) she will be the first person to cover the 103 miles without a shark cage.
Here is the SI coverage of her failed attempt in 1978. And I read this Times profile back in 1978, just before the Cuba attempt. This story about swimmer's delirium stayed with me through the years (and, by weird coincidence, I was mentioning it just last week):
And for those who would like to follow her footsteps, as it were, here is a bit of the training regimen from 1978:
I have no doubt I could do any one of those activities - if you gave me three or four days.
Hey, its only 90 miles to Key West from a certain point in Cuba. Why does she want to add mileage?
OT: Posted Coburn's "Back to Black" Plan on other thread but have it hear also at LUN.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | July 19, 2011 at 09:27 AM
I could handle the calorie intake.
Posted by: MayBee | July 19, 2011 at 09:35 AM
MayBee,
You beat me to it. It is the only thing I could do. I would freak out anyway, since I'm sort of, kind of scared to death of sharks.
Posted by: Sue | July 19, 2011 at 09:40 AM
The word "addict" comes to mind with some of these athletes. I've got some in my neighborhood - 5'8" tendons with multiple knee braces on...& just running, running, running.
They need a 12 step recovery program -
1. We admitted we were powerless over
alcoholexercising/extreme sports—that our lives had become unmanageable.Posted by: Janet | July 19, 2011 at 09:41 AM
I, too, vote for item 5.
It keeps the hands and jaw muscles nimble.
Posted by: Clarice | July 19, 2011 at 09:45 AM
Patriot.
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 19, 2011 at 10:12 AM
Cuba to Key West?
Is that longer than from Chelsea to Blackfriars?
If Diana Nyad took that Founding Father's test I think she'd be...Ben Franklin.
Web search sez:
---Franklin is credited with the invention of the swimming fins at the age of ten, in 1716.
---Franklin was an early proponent of physical fitness. In an age when few people knew how to swim, Franklin taught himself how to swim. He was an avid swimmer all his life and even contemplated becoming a full-time swim instructor. Benjamin Franklin is the only founding father in the Swimming Hall of Fame.
---On his visit to London at age nineteen, Ben went on a boating excursion with his printer friends. During the trip he leaped into the Thames River and swam from Chelsea to Blackfriars, performing every kind of feat, under water and above. He had learned these feats in the Schuylkill River at home in Philadelphia. He was so expert that he seriously considered opening a swimming school.
And since we're all Madison I went googling to see if James Madison knew how to swim. All I get is this website asking instead the important question: What Did the Founding Fathers Smell Like? Author sez: "the James Madison of my mind smells like a burning wool sock dipped in sour milk."
Bah, humbug!
Posted by: daddy | July 19, 2011 at 10:59 AM
I think most of them smelled like that, daddy. It was the age of weekly baths and heavy woolen clothing. Imagine walking a mile or two in midsummer in Philadelphia from the printing house, where the inks themselves smelled pretty strongly, down to the docks to hear the latest news from ships just arrived.
Then, eating something delicious such as mackerel sandwiches and a pint or two of ale, and you get the idea.
"Cleanliness is next to Godliness" only became operative sometime in the late 19th century among the more leisurely classes.
Posted by: matt | July 19, 2011 at 11:58 AM
The word "addict" comes to mind with some of these athletes.
The article alludes to early sexual abuse, so there do seem to be some psychological issues.
Just staying awake 60 hours would seem to be a hugely difficult feat, though I suppose having all those sharks around might help.
Posted by: jimmyk | July 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM
The word "addict" comes to mind with some of these athletes.
That's interesting, Janet. I have an old friend who I think has become a running addict. He is flying all over the country doing a marathon a month. He can't stop talking about it and I get the impression it might be causing trouble in his marriage. Coincidentally, he lives in your neck of the woods.
Posted by: Porchlight | July 19, 2011 at 12:39 PM
I read Diana Nyad's autobiography years ago. It was very interesting. That training regime? tough. I think these ultraathletes are trying to conquer frontiers, the way explorers searched for new continents.
Posted by: peter | July 19, 2011 at 02:08 PM
Daddy, if Ben Franklin swam from Chelsea to Blackfriars in 1716 a hundred and fifty years before Joseph Bazalgette did his thing, then I imagine he didn't smell too rosy.
Posted by: Kevin B | July 19, 2011 at 02:36 PM
The Thames was probably not as bad in 1716. The really huge population explosion was in the 19th century. In 1716 London's population was only about a quarter of what it was when the cholera epidemics broke out in the 1840s and 1850s.
Chelsea to Blackfriars is quite a feat.
Posted by: Porchlight | July 19, 2011 at 03:03 PM
The most interesting thing about the last(?) guy who swam the English Channel, IMO, was that he deliberately put on an extra 42 pounds before the swim -- and had used up every single one of them by the time he reached the opposite shore!
It would be hard for a distance runner to start with such a serious excess of weight on the ground, I expect. The idea that buoyancy is enough to mitigate the effect of gravity -- when you can so easily dive right into water too -- is really rather remarkable. The physics of buoyancy are easy enough, I'm sure, it's the anti-gravity angle that intrigues me. There's a depth at which water begins pushing back, and a weight at which it will crush you, and yet water molecules of hydrogen & oxygen aren't any denser, individually or collectively, at the bottom of the ocean than they are at the top, are they? It would take a black hole to crush 'em, where density is gravity, and gravity is the strongest, not the weakest, force in the universe, no? Back here on earth, gravitationally speaking, if we could actually dig a hole from here to China through the center of the planet, would our descent stop in the middle if we fell in?
Such questions are endlessly fascinating for people like me who have only a passing acquaintance with the laws which govern the universe. I can lie on my bed like a Science Sylvia and make up all my own reasons for why things happen as they do. A life spent swimming -- and preparing for swimming, thinking about swimming, talking about swimming, reading about swimming, doubtless dreaming about swimming, and maintaining yourself on an eat-to-swim diet -- seems impossibly dull in comparison.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 19, 2011 at 03:08 PM
Considering what the level of sanitation and hygiene was in the late 18th century, I always assumed the founding fathers smelled like burning slaughterhouses.
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 19, 2011 at 03:10 PM
"The word "addict" comes to mind with some of these athletes."
And rightly so. Exercise affects both your body chemistry and your brain chemistry. You reach the point of diminishing returns when it come to improving your actual health and welfare a lot sooner than folks who spend a lot of their waking hours at the gym or on the track might like to think. Beyond that, it's all about pleasure, and how it makes you feel either during or after your exertions.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 19, 2011 at 03:24 PM
(But, anyway, how did you miss that point in childhood when you noticed that a hole through the earth from the US ends up in the vicinity of Australia not China? :-))
(Oh, and the center of the earth is liquid, so the whole "hole" thing kinda falls apart, too.)
You would fall down the (rabbit?) hole, accelerating all the way down, and when you got to the middle of the earth you would keep right on going. Because of friction slowing you down, you would not make it all the way to the other side before you started falling back down through the earth. You would oscillate back and forth, each trip a little shorter, until finally you stopped moving at the center of the earth.Posted by: cathyf | July 19, 2011 at 03:56 PM
It does seem like the fastest route to get lead, for toy manufacturing, to the Chinese.
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 19, 2011 at 04:10 PM
Whew! I was getting dizzy from all that up and down stuff.
Posted by: Clarice | July 19, 2011 at 04:13 PM
JMH, for your pondering fun. If a child is born in a plane flying over U.S. air space, is the child eligible for POTUS?
Same question for a child born in a tunnel under the U.S. that has no access to the surface of the U.S.
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 19, 2011 at 04:25 PM
"A life spent swimming -- and preparing for swimming, thinking about swimming, talking about swimming, reading about swimming, doubtless dreaming about swimming, and maintaining yourself on an eat-to-swim diet -- seems impossibly dull in comparison."
Aquaman always was the most boring of the DC pantheon of Super-Heros.
Big deal, he could talk to fish. "Hey carp, how's it hanging?"
Posted by: daddy | July 19, 2011 at 04:27 PM
Beyond that, it's all about pleasure, and how it makes you feel either during or after your exertions.
Injury prevention. I play a lot of tennis, and I go to the gym to strengthen muscles to keep my joints from breaking down. I don't enjoy the exertions, but if they keep my elbows and knees working an extra decade they're worth it.
As for the tunnel to China, in addition to the liquid problem, there's the related temperature issue.
Posted by: jimmyk | July 19, 2011 at 05:14 PM
"would our descent stop in the middle if we fell in?"
The point cathy didn't mention is that gravity (slowly) goes to zero on the way to the center. There is no force to keep anything at the center. Might be a hundred miles in either direction with no detectable gravity.
Posted by: boris | July 19, 2011 at 05:17 PM
--"As for the tunnel to China, in addition to the liquid problem, there's the related temperature issue."--
Extremely hot, several million degrees.
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 19, 2011 at 05:33 PM
TK:
That would depend on which flag the plane was flying, and on who owned the mineral rights in your tunnel, I expect.
cathyf:
"how did you miss that point in childhood when you noticed that a hole through the earth from the US ends up in the vicinity of Australia not China?"
I never managed to get that far before the dinner bell rang!
If I were a friction-free feather, would I oscillate eternally? I assume the earth's rotation is a jumping-in-the-elevator issue. The heat and liquid factors need not arise given my hypothetical premise of a successfully completed passageway through which I could travel. :-)
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 19, 2011 at 05:48 PM
You mean if I walked down the steps (instead of taking the elevator) inside the Washington Monument from the top to the ground I wouldn't end up in China? Oh dear, you mean my Daddy lied to me when I was three years old? I'm crushed.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | July 19, 2011 at 05:55 PM
boris:
"The point cathy didn't mention is that gravity (slowly) goes to zero on the way to the center."
I didn't realize that, although it makes sense when larger objects suck smaller ones into orbit -- except for black holes where less is more.....which, I guess, would bring me back around to gravity and density?
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 19, 2011 at 06:01 PM
jimmyk:
"Injury prevention."
I wasn't saying that there were zero benefits in going to the gym. I'm saying folks don't run marathons for their health. Interestingly enough, muscular skiers are far more likely to suffer spiral bone fractures when they fall than folks whose muscles are weaker and don't bind their joints in place.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 19, 2011 at 06:14 PM
That's why I don't exercise too much...I don't want to suffer spiral bone fractures. I'm stickin' with my safe weak muscles.
Posted by: Janet | July 19, 2011 at 06:20 PM
--Same question for a child born in a tunnel under the U.S. that has no access to the surface of the U.S.--
You mean like a baby mole? Can they be citizens too? POTUS?
Posted by: Ignatz | July 19, 2011 at 06:22 PM
Re: the tunnel through the earth, here is another aspect that boggles the mind. If you cut a straight tunnel from any point to any other point on the surface of the Earth -- say NYC to SFO, you will 'fall' to the other end in exactly the same total time. This is assuming a vacuum so there is no drag (and you would oscillate indefinitely, as well).
Posted by: Manuel Transmission | July 19, 2011 at 06:42 PM
(("Cleanliness is next to Godliness" only became operative sometime in the late 19th century among the more leisurely classes))
and yet Ben Franklin included it as one of the Thirteen Virtues he aspired to throughout his life:
"Tolerate no uncleanliness in body, cloaths, or habitation."
Posted by: Chubby | July 19, 2011 at 06:54 PM
There were a lot of old wives tales about bathing that were still prevalent even through the 20th century.
My Aunt was appalled that I would consider bathing while on my period and washing your hair was tantamount to committing suicide. My Mother would say, "Just ignore her, it is what she was told as a young girl." She was a clean, well-groomed woman who pretty much hibernated for 4 or 5 days a month. The same woman who dusted and vacuumed her home every single day and expected you to wipe the kitchen and bathroom down with disinfectant.
Why do you think the French developed so many perfumes?
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | July 19, 2011 at 07:15 PM
I thought the Plague during the dark ages was what got folks to start cleaning up their act.
Germans are real sticklers for cleanliness.
Posted by: glasater | July 19, 2011 at 08:11 PM
"the Plague during the dark ages was what got folks to start cleaning up their act"
The other explanation is that people with an inherited cleanliness trait were more likely to survive and pass that trait on to their descendants.
Posted by: boris | July 19, 2011 at 08:50 PM
"You mean like a baby mole? Can they be citizens too? POTUS?"
The Mole Man was a US citizen so he'd be eligible to be President, but not the Mole Man's Monster.
Posted by: daddy | July 19, 2011 at 09:06 PM
My mind did boggle, Man Tran, but I suppose it would be a question of (gravity induced?) velocity.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 19, 2011 at 09:18 PM
JMH, that is the secret to the thought experiment. In free fall toward the center, the full acceleration of gravity is pulling, but any other angle and it is only the lesser component. It works out that the net travel time ends up being the same, because the average velocity drops off as the chordal distance drops off. More of a physics problem than and engineering one, but we were still stuck working it out with our sliderules.
Posted by: Manuel Transmission | July 19, 2011 at 10:40 PM
So if gravity is zero in the center, then gravity is a surface factor?
Then you could not fall into a hole because both sides are pulling you, assumable equally. You then would become stationary at the point where the force is equal.
Posted by: Agent J. (formally known as "J".. | July 19, 2011 at 10:50 PM
I think the book and movie "The Girl with the Pearl Earring" was historically accurate on how much the Dutch scrubbed and cleaned
Posted by: Chubby | July 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM
Agent J, Do you have the answer to the baby born on a plane question?
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 19, 2011 at 10:54 PM
I hate it when my subjects are plural and my verbs are singular
Posted by: Chubby | July 19, 2011 at 10:58 PM
My ancestors are German, Boris:-)
Posted by: glasater | July 19, 2011 at 11:08 PM
TK-I went back to your post and you said "over" the US..what is your definition of "over". If they were not landing within the US. We would not even know about it..
Posted by: Agent J. (formally known as "J".. | July 19, 2011 at 11:21 PM
A plane that is not landing in the U.S. Is such a plane in no contact with U.S. agencies while flying over our airspace?
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 19, 2011 at 11:38 PM
"if gravity is zero in the center, then gravity is a surface factor?"
If you are inside a shell, the gravity of the shell cancels out.
If you are outside a shell the vector sum of shell gravity points to the center as if the entire mass were placed there.
If you are 10 miles from the center of the earth, the entire shell greater than 10 miles radius cancels out. The only gravity you experience is from the sphere 10 miles in radius that you are "outside of". So basically the gravity of a small asteroid.
Posted by: boris | July 19, 2011 at 11:51 PM
TK - Unless that plane lands within the US, that child would not have any rights to US citizenship. Now if the child was birthed while flying over the airspace of the US, and landed within the US hey we have another citizen..
boris: Using your 10 mile plan, how could there not be gravity in the center of the Earth?
Posted by: Agent J. (formally known as "J".. | July 20, 2011 at 12:42 AM
TK and boris, I had a lot more fun last night trying to explain to a young lady why I thought her male friend was asexual..then trying to convince her that it was nothing that would cause her or him to be removed from their church..I think I may have many more evenings of misgiving that I even started the conversation.
Posted by: Agent J. (formally known as "J".. | July 20, 2011 at 12:48 AM
Wouldn't the child have to be born after the plane lands, In order to gain citizenship at birth?
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 20, 2011 at 01:17 AM
A U.S. ship is sovereign US territory; one presumes the same would hold true for an airship.
Posted by: JM Hanes | July 20, 2011 at 01:35 AM
I do not think that there is one cut and dried answer to this situation, lots of depends, as they say in the retirement center.
Like who owns the aircraft, did it land, was it intended to land, or did it land because of the birth..etc..
Posted by: Agent J. (formally known as "J".. | July 20, 2011 at 10:28 AM
"Using your 10 mile plan, how could there not be gravity in the center of the Earth?"
There is a tunnel straight through a planet that passes exactly 10 miles from the center. Gravity on the surface of the planet is the same as Earth, 1G.
The tunnel walls were constructed by Pierson's Puppeteers using technology similar to their General Products spaceship hulls. They added thermal protection, air conditioning, and pressure locks appropriately located to provide standard air pressure throughout
At the center of the tunnel, 10 miles above the center of the planet, stands a man who weighs 180 pounds on the surface. A house fly buzzing around the man's head lands there and attempts to pick the man up and fly away with him.
Assume the radius of the planet is 3000 miles and it's density is constant. Does the fly succeed?
Posted by: boris | July 20, 2011 at 01:04 PM
BTW on the surface the house fly can produce a lift of 0.02 gram.
Posted by: boris | July 20, 2011 at 01:05 PM
I (without) a lot of thought is going to say Number 1..why. Cause the guy weights 180 pounds.
Posted by: Agent J. (formally known as "J".. | July 20, 2011 at 03:35 PM
At the surface.
Since that answer is incorrect, here's a followup. How many miles can the fly carry the man up the tunnel?
Posted by: boris | July 20, 2011 at 03:46 PM
(before the man weighs too much for the fly to lift)
Posted by: boris | July 20, 2011 at 03:47 PM
--How many miles can the fly carry the man up the tunnel?--
Until he comes to the first pressure lock cause his tiny little fly hands won't be able to open it.
Posted by: Ignatz | July 20, 2011 at 03:57 PM
first the fly was to fly down the tunnel now the fly is to fly up the tunnel. but WAG #2.
You ask to hard of questions.LOL
Posted by: Agent J. (formally known as "J".. | July 20, 2011 at 07:47 PM
Well both directions lead to the surface on opposite sides of the planet. I decided "up the tunnel" would be more intuitive since a traveler would be going "up hill" either way.
Posted by: boris | July 20, 2011 at 08:12 PM
If the fly carries the man 11 miles up the tunnel they would be 15 miles from the center of the planet. That is 15 out of 3000 miles to the surface or 1/200.
Gravity is determined by mass which is proportional to volume which is proportional to radius cubed. 1/200 cubed is 1/8000000. So to find the wieght of the man convert 180 pounds to kilograms and divide by 8 million. Thus 11 miles up or down the tunnel the man weighs 0.01 gram. The house fly can easily carry the man over 10 miles in either direction.
Posted by: boris | July 21, 2011 at 06:48 PM