Former Enron advisor Paul Krugman outlined his latest stimulus idea on Fareed Zakaria's Sunday talkie:
It's very hard to get inflation in a depressed economy. But if you had a program of government spending plus an expansionary policy by the Fed, you could get that. So, if you think about using all of these things together, you could accomplish, you know, a great deal.
If we discovered that, you know, space aliens were planning to attack and we needed a massive buildup to counter the space alien threat and really inflation and budget deficits took secondary place to that, this slump would be over in 18 months.
So the economy would recover if the government hired a bunch of us to rush around with colanders on our heads staring at the sky? Well, that surely extends the list of things I am glad Sarah Palin didn't say. And Obama has tuned this guy out? Go figure.
As to the notion that prominent libs now view Cheney's misplaced emphasis on WMDs in Iraq as a failed jobs program, well, color me surprised. "Bush Lied, Not Enough Were Hired" - geez, that doesn't even rhyme.
Finally, if Paul Krugman read the NY Times he would not make "Give War A Chance" pronouncements such as this:
Think about World War II, right? That was actually negative social product spending, and yet it brought us out [of the Great Depression].
Former Obama economic advisor Christina Romer wrote this just last weekend:
AFTER the grim economic developments of the last few weeks, it’s easy to lose hope. Could the Great Recession of 2008 drag on for years, just as the Great Depression did in the 1930s? Adding to the despair is the oft-repeated notion that it took World War II to end the economic nightmare of the ’30s: If a global war was needed to return the economy to full employment then, what is going to save us today?
Look more closely at history and you’ll see that the truth is much more complicated — and less gloomy. While the war helped the recovery from the Depression, the economy was improving long before military spending increased.
Why is Krugman a tool of the defense industry, recycling these pro-war myths? Baffling. [More on these myths by way of Karl at PP.]
DARE WE TACKLE THS SUBSTANCE? Krugman and Zakaria are advocating for valueless make-work programs as a stimulus tool, drawing this comment from the invaluable Noel Sheppard:
On the other hand, isn't it fascinating that a man that is always opposed to tax cuts - which is government allowing people to keep more of THEIR money - and doesn't think that stimulates the economy believes it would be economically stimulative to give people someone else's money to do absolutely nothing?
Well, when pressed Krugman will admit that a payroll tax cut (which puts money in lower-income pockets) is about as likely to be spent and is therefore roughly as stimulative as extended unemployment insurance. In fact, back in the run-up to Obama's inauguration Krugman described payroll tax cuts as a "pretty good" stimulus tool. Well, briefly - a few days later they were "ineffective"; presumably that reflected a shift in the political winds.
My impression of the general economic consensus is that hiring people to dig and re-fill holes, or monitor for space aliens, does not provide any more stimulus than any other cash transfer to a person likely to spend it. Handing out money on street corners, the Bernanke helicopter drop, and payroll tax cuts should all be in play, subject to caveats about the marginal propensities to consume of the various beneficiaries.
If a proposed stimulative shovel-ready project adds social value (e.g., a useful bridge, or a useful bridge repair), then borrow the money, hire some people, and start digging; if the project adds nothing, it won't be more stimulative than a cash transfer to someone with a similar marginal propensity to consume. Krugman's belief in the power of make-work and his preference for that over tax cuts, is motivated by something other than standard economic textbook theory.
LAST GASP: There is a widespread economic consensus that temporary tax cuts (e.g., cash for clunkers) don't produce permanent changes in spening or investment. So why, one might ask, would a temporary uptick in government transfer payments by way of wacky make-work projects produce a permanent change in spending or investment?
Beats me. War advocates such as Krugman could respond that WWII didn't look like a temporary blip when it started. However, Krugman is now advocating an eighteen month War on Space; maybe his real plan is to declare a seemingly open-ended war on space with the hope that it can be wound down in eighteen months. Personally, I would like to know abit more about the likely timeframe since a colander-cap is not a good look for me.
KRUGMAN GETS RESULTS! We bend space-time to find these stalwart citizens answering Krugman's call and creating jobs! (Or is that the invasion force?)
BUMPER STICKERS: "Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kodos."
Foist!
Posted by: sbw | August 15, 2011 at 11:20 AM
Clearly, someone didn't tell him about Col. Jack O'Neil and the StarGate program.
Posted by: narciso | August 15, 2011 at 11:23 AM
Who owns the rights to Orson Welles' intellectual property?
Posted by: Jack is Back! | August 15, 2011 at 11:26 AM
I think Krugman is drinking early.
BTW, to be fair, Krugman is a long time science fiction fan; he even wrote an early piece on the economics of interstellar trade.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | August 15, 2011 at 11:27 AM
I thought Krugman believed the problem was rich, white trash?
Posted by: Janet | August 15, 2011 at 11:30 AM
prominent commentators who support the regime are promoting the idea that war would be good for the economy. welcome to 1936.
Posted by: macphisto | August 15, 2011 at 11:45 AM
but when things are all over, there'll be LOTS of work in the building trades. for the survivors.
Posted by: macphisto | August 15, 2011 at 11:46 AM
And to think Krugman is still teaching impressionable Princeton students. Sheesh. At least now thanks to TM I better understand that demonic gleam in his eyes.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vnjagvet | August 15, 2011 at 11:46 AM
'Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos'
Posted by: narciso | August 15, 2011 at 11:51 AM
If you look at that video I linked...he is such a schlub. You just know he has gravy stains on his sweater.
Has he signed on with the vegan Let's Move program?
Posted by: Janet | August 15, 2011 at 11:56 AM
Super, way way OT but inspiring:
Polish Cathedral of Salt
Three salt miners carved this church entirely of salt, deep in the earth in a Polish mine. Even the chandeliers. Incredible.
Posted by: Porchlight | August 15, 2011 at 11:56 AM
i've seen a television piece on the salt church...it may have been on the Modern Marvels episode on salt and salt mining. it really is quite remarkable.
Posted by: macphisto | August 15, 2011 at 12:06 PM
Icon of our time.
=======
Posted by: Back to the salt mine. | August 15, 2011 at 12:10 PM
Oldsmobile Ronan.
======
Posted by: Time to quit, the Typepad Goddess warbles sense over the waves. | August 15, 2011 at 12:11 PM
Henry Morgenthau, Jr. was the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury during the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt. He played a major role in designing and financing the New Deal.
“Morgenthau believed in balanced budgets, stable currency, reduction of the national debt, and the need for more private investment. The Wagner Act regarding labor unions met Morgenthau’s requirement because it strengthened the party’s political base and involved no new spending. Morgenthau accepted Roosevelt’s double budget as legitimate — that is, a balanced regular budget, and an “emergency” budget for agencies, like the Works Progress Administration (WPA), Public Works Administration (PWA) and Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), that would be temporary until full recovery was at hand. He fought against the veterans’ bonus until Congress finally overrode Roosevelt’s veto and gave out $2.2 billion in 1936.
In the 1937 "Depression within the Depression," Morgenthau was unable to persuade Roosevelt to desist from continued deficit spending. Roosevelt continued to push for more spending, and Morganthau promoted a balanced budget. On November 10, 1937, Morgenthau gave a speech to the Academy of Political Science at New York's Hotel Astor, in which he noted that the Depression had required deficit spending, but that the government needed to cut spending to revive the economy. In his speech, he said:[5]
His biggest success was the new Social Security program; he reversed the proposals to fund it from general revenue and insisted it be funded by new taxes on employees. Morgenthau insisted on excluding farm workers and domestic servants from Social Security because workers outside industry would not be paying their way.[6] He questioned the value of the deficit spending that had not reduced unemployment and only added debt:[7]
Oh well, I guess we are better off waiting for Space Invaders. At least that would start a new round of “Natural Born” questions.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 15, 2011 at 12:20 PM
Clearly the US was recoverying before the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor. By exporting war material to the Allies starting in 1938 it had become the Merchant of Death. It was not deficit spending that did it, it was spending the UK & France that primed pump.
Posted by: PaulV | August 15, 2011 at 12:25 PM
Give me butter or give me guns.
==============
Posted by: I see a break in the reef. | August 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM
Over at W.M.Briggs blog he asked his commenters for predictions for 2011. Mine were fairly tame: Part two of the double dip would be a doozy and the lizards beings who rule us all would finally be unmasked.
Now this idiot Krugman tells me that in order to avoid the former, we must welcome the latter.
And people called me crazy.
Posted by: Kevin B | August 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM
Stagflation and Malaise
Welcome Back Kotter
Ain't we lucky we got em.....Good Times!
Posted by: Army of Davids | August 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM
Obama doesn't really talk about rebuilding the foundation for a new America anymore, does he.
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 12:45 PM
That is because he already rebuilt it.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 15, 2011 at 12:52 PM
Looks to me like the Depression was just impossible to measure during the war -- and what really was required to end it was the death of Franklin D. "President For Life" Roosevelt. Once Truman was president the Depression was over...
Posted by: cathyf | August 15, 2011 at 12:55 PM
Now you understand the push for green jobs. The left has framed the debate as a "war" against the environment.
Posted by: Sharon | August 15, 2011 at 12:55 PM
Anyone catch this little nugget in the letters section of the weekend WSJ? To wit:
"Arrogance is the art taking pride in one'e stupidity."
- Goethe (apocryphally)
Apropos of nothing I guess but not completely unrelated to Krugman.
Posted by: lyle | August 15, 2011 at 12:58 PM
Aargh. "one's"
Posted by: lyle | August 15, 2011 at 12:59 PM
If we're going to spend money, might as well spend it on military items. That way, we have them if we need them, and if we have them if we need them various buttheads may decide not to bother.
So it will look like we didn't need them.
But defense plants are a lot more shovel-ready than the bulk of the stuff the stimplan didn't actually start.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey | August 15, 2011 at 01:01 PM
Obama's talking. He's happy to be out of Washington.
Also pointing out that unlike Bush who caused all the problems in the world when he was president, Obama has all these world problems being thrown in his way.
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 01:02 PM
From Squawk Box Europe early this AM:
Return to the Gold Standard?
Posted by: glasater | August 15, 2011 at 01:03 PM
And Obama (or "we") had put forward a plan that would have addressed deficits and removed instability for years to come. But the Republicans put politics over party.
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 01:03 PM
If Congress passes patent reform, someone could create another Google and Microsoft. Right now.
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 01:09 PM
America needs to live within its means.
If there are "some programs" that should be cut, let's cut 'em.
If there is "some redtape" let's get rid of it.
Then we get rid of loopholes for millionaires and billionairs and "take on" long term costs of health care?
This problem would be taken care of tomorrow!
-- this is our President, ladies and gentlemen
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 01:10 PM
Next big idea: increase taxes on people like Warren Buffet!
(what is that? like 3 people?)
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 01:12 PM
MayBee,
You have an admirable "constitution" to be able to listen to JEF and not make barf bags a scarcity.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | August 15, 2011 at 01:13 PM
Idiot.
In his house, he couldn't tell Michelle she can't go out shopping and buy new shoes and buy new dresses, but he can keep his golf clubs, that wouldn't be compromise.
That's what Congress needs to do.
He knows the difference between keeping what you already have and spending more on new things, right?
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 01:14 PM
JiB- notice how I foist him on you guys, even though nobody really asked me to? That's how I deal with it.
I wish Jane were watching this.
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 01:15 PM
He does not mention how much we could save if the US taxpayers didn't have to pay for this new bus and his presidential campaign.
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 01:16 PM
-- this is our President, ladies and gentlemen
An embarrassment even before you wince at the thought of foreigners listening to his b.s.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 15, 2011 at 01:17 PM
First questioner:
"As a young voter, thank you President Obama for making me believe things will be good again someday"
Talk about faint praise!
Then she asks about green energy.
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 01:17 PM
I watched. Did you notice the problem he had with TOTUS? He practically had to turn to the back to see it on his left. The poor guy may have whiplash.
Posted by: Jane | August 15, 2011 at 01:19 PM
So does he actually ever travel on the bus? Or does he fly and then take a limo in front of it?
Posted by: Jane | August 15, 2011 at 01:20 PM
It was worse than I thought it would be.
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 01:32 PM
I gave up after TOTUS kept repeating the SOS. Did the cameras ever show the size of the audience?
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vnjagvet | August 15, 2011 at 01:46 PM
I wonder if Obama's Misery Tour is using one of the 2 new $1M+ taxpayer-bought buses, supposedly, for the Dem and Rep nominees to use in 2012? LUN
Posted by: DebinNC | August 15, 2011 at 01:52 PM
Deb- yes, that's the bus he's using.
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 01:57 PM
"Hundreds are gathered" to hear Obama per local KCCV tv. Who got tickets?.."On Sunday, people started lining up for tickets around 2 a.m. It took only an hour to run out of the free tickets when organizers started handing them out Sunday afternoon."
Posted by: DebinNC | August 15, 2011 at 01:59 PM
Gives new meaning to roach coach. He could have saved money and bought a used corporate jet.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 15, 2011 at 02:05 PM
Politico is all over Obama's new "modest ride". It's a bus, it's so black it doesn't appear to have windows, and there's no writing on it at all. No mention of its cost. Thank goodness, our media watchdogs never sleep.
Posted by: DebinNC | August 15, 2011 at 02:07 PM
"The
BuckBus Stops Here"Posted by: Threadkiller | August 15, 2011 at 02:09 PM
Next big idea: increase taxes on people like Warren Buffet!
Mr Buffet has said repeatedly that he would be perfectly willing to contribute more of his fortune to the federal government, provided only that it consents to threaten him with imprisonment for the rest of his life if he refuses.
Posted by: bgates | August 15, 2011 at 02:12 PM
From the little dab that was on CNBC of Zero's end of the speech, the video shot is pretty 'tight' in that not much of the size of the attendees shows in the frame.
This a typical way of making the crowd look bigger than it is.
The talking heads sounded underwhelmed in their reporting of the event.
Posted by: glasater | August 15, 2011 at 02:15 PM
Just for you DebinNC: here is fairly good photo link of the bus:
Obama's Black Bus
Posted by: centralcal | August 15, 2011 at 02:16 PM
Also, for those of you interested in crowd size of the event, the bus link has other photos in grid format below, that will give you some idea that the turnout was underwhelming.
Posted by: centralcal | August 15, 2011 at 02:18 PM
I was reminded of this from Hitchhiker's Guide:
Probably inside, when you press one of the black controls labelled in black on a black background a little light lights up black to let you know you've done it.
Posted by: narciso | August 15, 2011 at 02:20 PM
Is it just me or does the bus look scary?
I don't think it's going to make the right impression.
Posted by: Porchlight | August 15, 2011 at 02:21 PM
I mean, the hoped-for impression. "Scary" and "intimidating" works just fine for me, presonally.
Posted by: Porchlight | August 15, 2011 at 02:21 PM
Whoa, cc, that thing's huge. How in the world did they get it there? Obama can take a nap or eat a five-course meal when not watching ESPN on his giant screen tv.
Posted by: DebinNC | August 15, 2011 at 02:25 PM
It is not just you, Porch. It looks like a bus Don Vito Corleone would have felt right at home riding in. All it needs is button men following closely in their black, bullet proof SUV'S.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vnjagvet | August 15, 2011 at 02:30 PM
It does look a bit unfriendly, now that you mention it.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 15, 2011 at 02:30 PM
Surely they won't have SS guys in shades exit before Obama does.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 15, 2011 at 02:31 PM
___Instalanche___
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | August 15, 2011 at 02:32 PM
ha ha, funny you should mention eating on the bus - Mark Knoller just tweeted:
Pres. Obama stopped his buscapade at a deli in Cannon Falls for lunch. Hope they have valet parking.
From what I am seeing on Twitter from the MFM guys, it doesn't appear any of his cheerleaders are too impressed.
Posted by: centralcal | August 15, 2011 at 02:32 PM
So will the Republican nominee get to paint it how he wants it?
I'm guessing we'll be able to tell when Obama is campaigning and when he's presidenting by whether or not they've slapped an "O" sign on the side of the bus.
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 02:33 PM
Here is a sampling of two head cheerleaders earlier today:
@chucktodd MT @jdickerson: president on a political bus tour which he says isn't political where he will tell Republicans to stop behaving politically.
Posted by: centralcal | August 15, 2011 at 02:34 PM
I don't think it's going to make the right impression.
Maybe it's white on the other side.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 15, 2011 at 02:38 PM
Think the Republi-Bus has been bugged?
The Trojan Greyhound.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 15, 2011 at 02:38 PM
I hope to God he's not in the back of the bus.
Posted by: MarkO | August 15, 2011 at 02:39 PM
Here is a great shot of the Cannon Falls townhall. Not a big group at all.
Sheesh, can't Obummer get a decent tailor? Look at those pants puddled around his ankles!
Posted by: centralcal | August 15, 2011 at 02:39 PM
Maybe it's white on the other side.
Heh.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 15, 2011 at 02:42 PM
Incredible cc; they look like they were bought for somebody taller. Maybe he's shrinking before our eyes in reality as well as metaphorically.
Funny how he's avoiding Wisconsin on this trip. I'm sure it's just an oversight.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 15, 2011 at 02:44 PM
Romer - wasn't that the worthless, sack-of-fat edu-tard that stated unemployment would cap at 8% if we spent a trillion (including interest) we didn't have?
Posted by: apb | August 15, 2011 at 02:45 PM
I think this bus trip may be too cynical even for the press.
Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2011 at 02:45 PM
The crowd was huge: In Cannon Falls, along the leafy banks of the Cannon River, several hundred people attended the town-hall style meeting
Well not quite the size of a small tea party rally, but who is counting?
Posted by: Jane | August 15, 2011 at 02:47 PM
Yay!
Were there a hundred people there?
Posted by: Extraneus | August 15, 2011 at 02:47 PM
paul krugman...
1. we need to spend without regard to debt, to create growth.
2. we need to tax people, now, without regard to the effects on growth, to show that we can pay for things.
my basic problem with krugman is that his positions on spending/debt, growth, and taxes are a textbook example of cognitive dissonance.
Posted by: mark l. | August 15, 2011 at 02:49 PM
--"Were there a hundred people there?"--
Naw, that bus couldn't hold more than forty.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 15, 2011 at 02:52 PM
Paulie Peanuts has obviously lost it and needs an intervention. Unfortunately he's indistinguishable from those around him at his workplace.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 15, 2011 at 02:52 PM
Come on, Krugman, are you an economist or not?
"Assume an alien invasion...."
Posted by: Ron Coleman | August 15, 2011 at 02:57 PM
Watching him give that speech you would not have thought there was one person directly in front of him. The totus handlers were clearly expecting a bigger crowd.
Posted by: Jane | August 15, 2011 at 03:00 PM
HuffPoo is making fun of the couple of dozen Tea Party protesters at the event. Not going to link; wouldn't be prudent.
Posted by: Porchlight | August 15, 2011 at 03:00 PM
Ha, Ron Coleman!
Posted by: Porchlight | August 15, 2011 at 03:02 PM
uh oh, Sarah Palin, painted her tonails polkadot for Iowa State Fair
Lefties (Sullivan) went nuts.
Posted by: centralcal | August 15, 2011 at 03:02 PM
"space aliens"
will they be taking the jobs that even our illegal aliens don't want?
Posted by: mark l. | August 15, 2011 at 03:06 PM
actually, forget space aliens taking jobs...
will we be required to educate their children and provide free healthcare?
talk about 'cloward-piven' from outer space...
Posted by: mark l. | August 15, 2011 at 03:09 PM
Perhaps Krugman is a space alien. He overlooks that if we were successful in our defense, we would get relief from the space alien threat but there is no reason to have that kind of build up without the space alien threat. Being safe from space aliens would be great with or without inflation.
Is he suggesting we manufacture a threat and then spend money on it (gee, break a window and then repair it-- oh that's it, the London riots were simply a Krugman stimulus program!).
What we can hope for is that the space aliens destroy other countries and then we can make money building them back up. One of our demands in the armistice is that they take Krugman back with them.
Posted by: Barry Dauphin | August 15, 2011 at 03:49 PM
O-bombing Libya wasn't stimulus enough?
Posted by: DANEgerus | August 15, 2011 at 03:49 PM
He is following the Spinal Tap 'more selective audience' rule, god that is pitiful.
Posted by: narciso | August 15, 2011 at 03:50 PM
Did Krugman really advise Enron?
If so, when and for how long?
In what ways?
Was he on the board?
I am ignorant of this and wish some of those commentators with illustrious intelligence and learning to please educate me since I have stupidly missed some important connection.
I do remember that Bush/Co, both before that presidency and during it was a favorite cause to be supported by Enron and that as a return of favor Enron was given the chance to help chose many of those patriotic Americans whose job was to regulate it's trades.
Some of us who lived in California at that time still remember. My GOP brother-in-law was going ballistic at the time because he lived in San Diego, an area where the cost of energy suddenly shot up, Of corse he blamed the Davis administration being the good GOP foot soldier.
Eventually we even elected a "governator", but sadly even he could not influence my brother-in to embrace the realities of that situation. For once the "ratings" agencies solved the problem for us and I detect by the tone of the article that that was a good thing after all since it shut down a criminally run operation.
Rumor has it that Bush/Co was a sadder place to work at after that. They went into morning and attempted to forget that their good friend had ever existed due to the shock of that loss.
In the area Pasadena where the municipality owned the power utility, we did not even notice scam in our bills. The People of Pasadena were protected, praise be to God.
Again I am only visiting to request an education concerning Krugman's involvement with Enron, any info, or lack of it will be greatly appreciated.
Posted by: Ernest | August 15, 2011 at 03:50 PM
From Discover the Networks:
In 1999 Krugman was part of an Enron Corporation board that paid him $50,000. In 1999, as journalist Andrew Sullivan has reported, Krugman wrote an article praising Enron's free-wheeling entrepreneurial structure. (Enron would later collapse amid scandal and charges of financial wrongdoing. Thereafter distancing himself from the disgraced company, Krugman in a 2001 column would describe the aforementioned board as "an advisory panel that had no function that I was aware of.")
Posted by: narciso | August 15, 2011 at 03:54 PM
Or this, particularly fatuous column
http://www.kevinholtsberry.com/kh/2002/01/29/paul-krugman-and-enron-this/
Posted by: narciso | August 15, 2011 at 03:57 PM
Paul Krugman wears a bra on his face in public at the 2009 Ig Nobel awards (the bra converts into a gas mask).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kxf3HK21BWI#t=3m10s
Posted by: Nate Whilk | August 15, 2011 at 03:59 PM
In Krugman's Wiki page he says he only got $37K, which was mere pocket change to a man of his towering stature, since he gets $20K per hour for speeches.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 15, 2011 at 04:01 PM
Very, very lame response to Krugman. The best you can do is cite "Karl" at Patterico and Amity Shlaes? Try viewing the entire segment - here. It's actually a pretty interesting discussion. Although perhaps not if you're humor challenged.
Posted by: Dave | August 15, 2011 at 04:39 PM
Krugman's relationship with Enron was the classic credentialed moron scam. Krugman sold his name to Enron for $50 K a year. In return, Enron got to put Krugman's name on all its company sales pitch stuff as an economic advisor to the company. Krugman's actual participation with the company was a once every 3 month expense paid weekend with a bunch of other credentialed morons that was called something like a "strategic ecnomic advisors board meeting." Not quite as demanding as being a Fannie/Freddie board member like Rahm, but those higher paying gigs went to former Dem politicla operatives, which is one step higher up on the credentialed moron scale.
Posted by: Ranger | August 15, 2011 at 04:40 PM
Oh, and I just want to be absolutely clear on the argument being made by Krugman. Borrowing $1 Trillion to fight a real war does serious harm to the economy, but borrowing $2-3 trillion to prepare for a pretend war against space aliens would be great for the economy right now. The obvious answer is to spend $2-3 trillion on a real war right now!
Posted by: Ranger | August 15, 2011 at 04:46 PM
Rush Limbaugh calls Krugman "ferret-like," and I won't quibble with that, but Krugman will always have his defenders. Why? Because his heart is in the right place.
Cutting taxes (otherwise known as "increased spending in the tax code") is bad, because it means less money confiscated from people who earn it in productive endeavors; but government spending - even on wasteful do-nothing fantasies - is good. Simple, and possibly even brilliant. $20K per hour is a bargain for this genius.
THE ONION: Should The Government Stop Dumping Money Into A Giant Hole?
KRUGMAN: No way!
Posted by: Extraneus | August 15, 2011 at 05:43 PM
It's actually a pretty interesting discussion. Although perhaps not if you're humor challenged.
We'd already discussed it in the comment section previously and found it wanting in just about everything. Including humor.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 15, 2011 at 06:21 PM
Ace, before he became all verklempt in his next fur regrafting post , made the Krugman comparison to Adrian Veldt, the mastermind
in Watchmen, who engineers a phony alien
invasion to avert WW 3, that was one movie
I really wanted to walk out of btw.
Posted by: narciso | August 15, 2011 at 06:30 PM
Oh dear God narc; it looks like the Ewok, AllahBeta and Poppin' were wined and dined by TOP MEN and given an advance peek at the Iowa crop report. I almost get as big a charge out of the way Sarah screws with those idiots' noggins as what she does to El JEFe's. I think ace is batting a perfect .000 on all things Palin.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 15, 2011 at 06:44 PM
((uh oh, Sarah Palin, painted her tonails polkadot for Iowa State Fair))
she must have visited the Redneck Beauty Salon
Posted by: Chubby | August 15, 2011 at 06:59 PM
Yanno, I've read a number SF books based on the premise (fairly understandable) that an invasion by aliens of earth would instantly unite earth. (The Arab saying "Me and my brother against my cousin; me, my brother, and my cousin against the other" is fairly universal, even if the rest of us don't have a saying). We all still have tribal leanings, even if sports teams have displaced clans in most of the west...
But... I don't think it would cure the economy too.
Posted by: Kathy Kinsley | August 15, 2011 at 07:03 PM