Cnn's John King is getting attetion with this story about our faster-than light Attorney General:
Obama Spoke About "Fast & Furious" Before Holder Claimed He Knew
CNN's John King plays Holder's testimony to Congress on MAY 3, 2011, where he said he had only just recently heard about the Fast & Furious gunrunning program. "I'm not sure of the exact date, but I probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time over the last few weeks," Attorney General Eric Holder said.
Then CNN compares Holder's testimony to what President Obama said in MARCH to CNN Espanol about the operation. "I heard on the news about this story that -- Fast and Furious, where allegedly guns were being run into Mexico, and ATF knew about it, but didn't apprehend those who had sent it." Transcript of the segment that aired on "John King USA" below:
KING: He [Holder] says over the last few weeks.
That is on May 3, 2011. Listen to this interview the president of the United States, not the attorney general, the president of the United States, had with CNN Espanol back in March.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: There have been problems, you know. I heard on the news about this story that -- Fast and Furious, where allegedly guns were being run into Mexico, and ATF knew about it, but didn't apprehend those who had sent it.
Eric Holder has -- the attorney general has been very clear that he knew nothing about this. We had assigned an I.G., inspector general, to investigate it. (END VIDEO CLIP)
KING: It begs the question, how did the president know about this in March, and how did the president know the attorney general knew nothing about this in march, when the attorney general says in May he just learned about it a couple weeks ago?
Some thoughts: first, let's not place John King in the Journalist Hall of Fame just yet. He is following up on some questions raised by Ed Henry of Fox News at an Oct. 5 press briefing, as described by CNS News:
Q So to clear up any confusion, when was the first time the President --
MR. CARNEY: Again, I --
Q No, no, not the Attorney General. When was the first time the President heard about this program?
MR. CARNEY: Well, as he said in public, in a press conference, he heard about it when he read about it. And that was sometime earlier this year. I think the press conference was in El Salvador when he was on that trip, and he referenced having heard about it recently. I don’t have a specific day.
Jay Carney got back to CNS News with the details:
Later, however, Carney clarified to CNSNews.com that the president had explained how he learned about Fast and Furious not at the press conference in El Salvador but in an interview with CNN Espanol that had aired that same day, March 22.
Note the date. Obama also discussed "Fast and Furious" with Univision's Jorge Ramos on March 23, as reported by CBS News.
So somehow, Obama knew about the controversy around "Fast and Furious" in late March, knew the inspector general had been asked to look at it, and know that Eric Holder knew nothing about it. Yet come May 3, Eric Holder claimed he only learned that "Fast and Furiou" was controversial in "the last few weeks". Puzzling?
Well, sort of - it depends on the meaning of "a few". From late March to early May is about five weeks; even if the inspector general had been involved in mid-March, that is still only a six or seven week lag. Is seven "a few" weeks? Hey, time flies when you're planning civilian trials for Qaeda terrorists and investigating the CIA.
And let's note this previous Administration clarification:
Following the release of the memos, a Justice Department official said that Holder "has consistently said he became aware of the questionable tactics in early 2011 when ATF agents first raised them publicly, and then promptly asked the (inspector general) to investigate the matter."
According to the official, Holder testified in March 2011, to a Senate Appropriations subcommittee, of that development...
Well, has anyone seen that March testimony? My time management and search skills are betraying me, but it certainly fits the emerging Administration cover-up timeline. That said, one would presume that a sympathetic Senaor would be talking this testimony up if it were helpful to Holder.
As to how or when Obama learned about "Fast and Furious" on the news, I welcome reader's thoughts. I am pretty sure he didn't read about it in the NY Times, but maybe he tunes in to CBS [on Feb 23, 2011, for example]. Or is Obama a secret Rush listener?
UPDATE: The breakout CBS story cites the Avila indictment, which was unsealed Jan 25, 2011. Avila was a straw purchaser tracked for quite a while and busted after two of "his" gus turned up near two dead Border Patrol agents. That seems to have prompted the ensuing cover-up, or fog bank.
I don't find any conflict between the "few weeks" testimony and the timeline we now have. And if one thinks he was trying to make it sound like, say, three weeks instead of the actual five, the next question is "why?" Would he lie under oath to chop off a couple of weeks? Even if he didn't get caught in the lie, what would it benefit him?
I think he's just a dunce who spoke carelessly.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | October 14, 2011 at 02:41 PM
When did Holder appoint the IG?
I think he's just a dunce who spoke carelessly.
I think he has known about it since its inception. I think the order went from Obama to Holder.
That's what I think. Of course I can't prove it, yet.
Posted by: Jane | October 14, 2011 at 02:52 PM
Hey, time flies when you're planning civilian trials for Qaeda terrorists and investigating the CIA.
Nah, he was busying reversing himself on closing Calif. marijuana dispensaries that have their own local growers. Wouldn't want his Mexican Cartel friends to lose any more market share than they have already.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 14, 2011 at 02:55 PM
Haul everyone before a grand jury without their notes. Ask them to detail every conversation about the operation. Everyone will certainly have a different recollection. Grant immunity to the one most likely to have lied if he rats out
the one most likely to be the target of media and DC citizen 10 minute hate and indict him.
It's a simple thing right out of the SDNY US Atty playbook.
Posted by: Clarice | October 14, 2011 at 03:05 PM
DOT-- have to disagree with you again. I'm sold on the likelihood that F&F really was a disasterous amoral attempt to advance gun restrictions that was incompetently administered (mais bien sur!!) and dozens? hundreds? of Mexican nationals and at least 1 ATF agent were killed with "walked" guns. Thus, Holder and the Obamaniac have spent the last 11 months trying to act like F&F never existed and if it did they didn't know about it. This is a plain old DC cover up-- only without the breathless Legacy Media coverage.
Posted by: NK | October 14, 2011 at 03:08 PM
Clarice-- after you indict, take the plea and get the confessed miscreant to testify to Issa's committee under the Klieg lights and name names-- just like Iran-Contra 25 years ago.
Posted by: NK | October 14, 2011 at 03:11 PM
NK, all of that may very well be true. But it doesn't explain why Holder would have lied to make his discovery of the program appear two weeks more recent than an actual date that could be proved. If he had known about the program for a year and was going to lie, why wouldn't he have lied by saying he learned about it in March?
In short, whether it's a lie or not, I don't think "in the past few weeks" is inconsistent with March.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | October 14, 2011 at 03:23 PM
Clarice--did the final sentence of your first paragraph at 3:05 get garbled?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | October 14, 2011 at 03:25 PM
Danube, I think she was refering to the Special District New York (SDNY) where Guiliani and Spitzer worked. However my Federal acronym decipherer is rusty.
Posted by: henry | October 14, 2011 at 03:37 PM
Oops, if I could read properly I wouldn't have posted that.
Posted by: henry | October 14, 2011 at 03:38 PM
DOT-- my take. That's what happens when people decide to cover up; they tell stupid lies, ridiculous half truthes, they are inconsistent with co-conspirators. Happens all the time, especially with DC politicians. Holder is just trying to delay and stall the truth coming out. So, he 'll say stupid and inconsistent things. Didn't Libby and the reporters do that back in the day?
Posted by: NK | October 14, 2011 at 03:39 PM
DOT:
I think the opposite is true. Because of the John King reference ,now Holder can claim March when in fact he originally in his arrogance was trying to cover his behind by claiming ignorance. There is no way Obama knew and Holder didn't. No AG is that lazy.
Posted by: maryrose | October 14, 2011 at 03:45 PM
Speaking of faster than light, there's a new paper up on Arxiv that may explain the FTL neutrinos.
Basically, they were synchronizing usin GPS satellites, and too everything into account except one little thing:
Because the GPS satellites are travelling at around 5 miles per second, there's a significant relativistic effect compared to the ground. That effect, from the satellite's frame of reference, shortens the distance between the 2 ends of the experiment by about 32 light-nanoseconds. The structure of the experiment is such that the total time is out-and-back, so the total Lorentz foreshortening is about 64 light-nanoseconds.
How must ahead of time were the neutrinos arriving?
64 nanoseconds.
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | October 14, 2011 at 03:46 PM
Yes, Dot..I meant indict the pre-ordained target.
Hey, Chaco, so Einstein still rules? Yeah.
Posted by: Clarice | October 14, 2011 at 03:49 PM
A nanosecond walks into a bar . . . .
Posted by: Thomas Collins | October 14, 2011 at 04:05 PM
Selling 2,900 "assault weapons", Barret .50 cal sniper rifles, and other firearms into the hands of the drug cartels almost certainly required cabinet level knowledge if not approval.
The political ramifications in a hyperpolitical administration would probably have to have been considered.The IG just sort of disappeared into the woodwork.
I think the sun was in their eyes, Charlie.
Posted by: matt | October 14, 2011 at 04:11 PM
WH dumps CLASS feature of Obamacare--first the waivers, now this..How many pp are left?
Also, it's no longer jobs saved or created. It's not jobs "supported".
Posted by: Clarice | October 14, 2011 at 04:18 PM
Bush did it too, you wingerz!
Posted by: lyle | October 14, 2011 at 04:19 PM
OT, but wouldn't this little girl be better off if her people assimilated with the mainstream?
Posted by: peter | October 14, 2011 at 04:22 PM
"There is no way Obama knew and Holder didn't. No AG is that lazy."
Agreed. But by saying the "last few weeks" Holder can argue that he's placing his discovery of the scheme at the same time as Obama's. I'm by no means saying he's not lying; I'm just saying that those two tapes, without more, don't prove it.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | October 14, 2011 at 04:24 PM
"don't prove it"
That's true but the serious nature of the allegations is sufficient for the invocation of the Schumer Standard requiring 10-12 months worth of continuous investigation.
I believe that the AG should acknowledge that he was so involved in working up a legal memo in support of breaking the law in the Solyndra matter that he just didn't notice the DoJ program to arm Mexican drug cartels.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | October 14, 2011 at 04:30 PM
almost certainly required cabinet level knowledge if not approval.
The choices for the Administration right now are
a. perjury
b. stupidity
Either way, it spells "fail".
But let's not sell Issa short on this. Smart prosecutors don't ask questions they don't already know the answers to. I get the real feeling that Issa is sitting on something, possibly yielded through Melson's testimony, that will nail the coffin closed. Boy, I sure hope so. Would love to see our resident Constitutional Professor (head of the mostest transparent administration evah!) take the stand without a teleprompter, after Holder dimes him out to save his own skin.
I know it probably won't happen. But a guy can dream, can't he.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 14, 2011 at 04:30 PM
DOT-- Libby was convicted of "misrecalling" conversations like that.
Posted by: NK | October 14, 2011 at 04:32 PM
I can't wait to see Holder testify before Issa on C-Span. I'm already buying more popcorn. I think if they phrase the question a certain way and also include questions about Obama's knowledge they can trip him up.
DOT:
I believe there are more e-mails and that the ones released so far are the safe ones. I'm just waiting for the fatal shoe to drop. The fact that so much info is redacted is also a red flag into this failed oppo. When this big of a screw -up occurs,someone has to take the fall. In this case, the music has stopped and Holder doesn't have a chair to sit in or an explanation that will be believed.
Posted by: maryrose | October 14, 2011 at 04:33 PM
I believe that the AG should acknowledge that he was so involved in working up a legal memo in support of breaking the law in the Solyndra matter that he just didn't notice the DoJ program to arm Mexican drug cartels.
And if you don't believe him, why, just ask Malik Shabazz who was hanging around the office that day. He'll tell you.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 14, 2011 at 04:38 PM
Holder was busy preparing his testimony about"my people" being harassed and unduly prosecuted. He was also too busy telling all who would listen that no way in hell were the Philadelphia Black Panthers going down.
Posted by: maryrose | October 14, 2011 at 04:55 PM
I predict that the MSM will be bombarding us over the next few weeks with the breathless revelations that the ATF under Bush authorized gunwalking. Lyle is joking but that is not just a dodge for commenters, it will be the full-on substance of the pushback. It's all they have and it will be used to shout down anything else.
Posted by: Boatbuilder | October 14, 2011 at 04:56 PM
I thought there were reports that Holder had been briefed in late 2010?
Re: Cabinet level approval?
Obama rarely meets with his Cabinet, so I doubt they were informed.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) | October 14, 2011 at 04:56 PM
Boatbuilder:
That stategy is not going to work and the American people will not be fooled. There is blood on their hands and the memos don't lie. Someone is going to have to be held accountable for this.
Posted by: maryrose | October 14, 2011 at 05:03 PM
Fox news is all over this and the sham MSNBC tactics will not wash.
Posted by: maryrose | October 14, 2011 at 05:04 PM
Soy what's wrong with "All of the above"?
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 14, 2011 at 05:06 PM
Fox news is all over this and the sham MSNBC tactics will not wash.
Most of the people at MSNBC don't wash.Why should their tactics?
OL:
Of course, you're right. That's one thing I should have learned in the last three years - stupid and evil are not mutually exclusive.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 14, 2011 at 05:11 PM
I'm sold on the likelihood that F&F really was a disasterous amoral attempt to advance gun restrictions
Remember that spate of MSM stories that all came out around the same time in 2009 about how the drug violence in Mexico was abetted by US gun sales?
Here is but one of many examples:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/26/world/americas/26iht-border.4.20459692.html
Journolisters must have helped coordinate that one. At any rate, it was clear that the administration was preparing the ground for something. I, too, believe it was gun control-related.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 14, 2011 at 05:41 PM
I get the real feeling that Issa is sitting on something, possibly yielded through Melson's testimony, that will nail the coffin closed
My only claim to fame, which I repeat here as often as possible, is that I am the only person I know of who predicted the bombing Clinton ordered when he was flying back from Israel and the democrats were about to tell him to resign.
Today we find the president has sent troops to Uganda. Not anywhere near the same thing, but as with the whole foiled Iranian terrorist attack, I'm pretty sure panic has set in. Obama isn't as smart as Clinton and a whole lot nastier, so I suspect it is about to get very interesting around here.
And I also think Issa has a smoking gun. Not to mention what came out on Solyndra today. The administration may, however, have a bigger one. As we know, they don't bring a knife to a gun fight.
Posted by: Jane | October 14, 2011 at 05:45 PM
Why is everyone looking at Cabinet involvement when all the power has been vested in the "Czars"? I think DoT is correct in his view that there's no "gotcha" in the tapes, especially taking into account the elusiveness of just what "a couple of weeks" might mean. Why, it's right up there with "is"!
Secondly, it's my belief that this was policy from the evening of January 20, 2008, forward. I think it was kim who posted a proposed UN resolution ceding global governance of weapons to the UN. Might have been rse, I can't remember right now. This was a method to remove the sovereignty of the Second Amendment by stealth. What totalitarian wouldn't love that?
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | October 14, 2011 at 05:47 PM
Jane-
The lending to donors companies will be the end game, not F&F. The extent and breadth of this will be way bigger, as the info on loans starts to really be dug into. It won't be by MFM, but curious and determined citizens. This Admin is too dumb to have left it up to earmarks, they would've wanted complete control of the money, and where it went. Total Chicago. Oooh boy, this is going to be good, IF it transpires as I think it will.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | October 14, 2011 at 05:52 PM
I agree Mel, except for the F&F murders. You can't forget that. Solyndra will indeed look uglier, but no one should forget Brian Terry.
Posted by: Jane | October 14, 2011 at 05:56 PM
Secondly, it's my belief that this was policy from the evening of January 20, 2008, forward.
I think you mean 2009, Mel. And I agree.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 14, 2011 at 05:58 PM
henry,
Its Southern District New York, right? Not special.
Remember, in all of this it will be the cover-up that nails them. What we need is for the new PJ and alternative media to step up much like Drudge did with Clinton-Lewinsky and blow this up to the point where it cannot be ignored. John King is a start but expect walk back in 10..9...8...
Posted by: Jack is Back! | October 14, 2011 at 06:14 PM
Remember that spate of MSM stories that all came out around the same time in 2009 about how the drug violence in Mexico was abetted by US gun sales?
The WaPo had them too. Again, it would be interesting if some real reporters looked into how much the Dems & the MFM are/were in cahoots as to laying the groundwork for gun control laws.
Posted by: Janet | October 14, 2011 at 06:25 PM
"Libby was convicted of 'misrecalling' conversations like that."
Not really. There is a materiality standard for perjury (or obstruction, or lying to congress). A prosecutor couldn't meet that standard here.
I am hoping fervently that Issa has the goods. And it's my understanding that Wide Receiver did, indeed, involve allowing guns to go south, but that all of them were tracked and arrests were made. Not sure. Anyhow, "Bush did it too" is a bit unseemly coming from these guys who have spent three years trashing the man.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | October 14, 2011 at 06:35 PM
Janet,
It would be interesting to consider what other memes were being pushed in the first heady hours of The Thousand Day Reich. There's no way that the malicious stupidity of Holder and Chu was not matched or surpassed elsewhere in the Maladministration.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | October 14, 2011 at 06:36 PM
Thanks JiB.
Posted by: henry | October 14, 2011 at 06:42 PM
Let's not forget that these lunatics allowed a couple of thousand grenades to be shipped south of the border, down Me-hico way, also.
Posted by: Ignatz | October 14, 2011 at 07:08 PM
WH is refusing to release Solyndra docs.
I wonder why.
Here we go.
Posted by: Jane | October 14, 2011 at 07:13 PM
Another nail in the Obamacare coffin. Sebelius taps out on CLASS act. Put that in your day of action and smoke it. Happy Red October Comrades!
Posted by: scott | October 14, 2011 at 07:21 PM
Rick:
The Thousand Day Reich.
Yike. We're three days away from realizing that milestone...
By the way,I'm late with the Ras Stat of the Day . . . from yesterday.
Yesterday Obama reached 47% overall approval (which was matched again today),for the first time in 66 days. Ras has picked up on an uptick . . . for some reason
And at 53% overall disapproval,today marks the 125th consecutive day of Obama's overall disapproval being >=50%.
Posted by: hit and run | October 14, 2011 at 07:24 PM
Yike. We're three days away from realizing that milestone...
It just seems like longer.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 14, 2011 at 07:27 PM
Only 463 days to go...
It just seems like several trillion.
Posted by: hit and run | October 14, 2011 at 07:38 PM
Only 463 days to go...It just seems like several trillion.
And miles to go before I sleep. And miles to go before I sleep.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 14, 2011 at 07:46 PM
Happy Red October Comrades!
Back at ya, scott!
Posted by: Janet | October 14, 2011 at 07:48 PM
If you look at the daily RCP Average, the overall approval at Raz has been at or near the top for several weeks now. For example, Gallup has it at 40% today. I am at a loss to explain it.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | October 14, 2011 at 07:57 PM
How much of OWS is helping Obama poll numbers. Never discount the American naiveté for the "underdog" or the "underachiever". There is a reason, The Simpsons are so popular.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | October 14, 2011 at 08:02 PM
Geez, guys, put yourself in the shoes of a rabid poli-sci prof reading Jay Cost's piece this morning, verifying the independent's 35% share at Gallup and then staring at that bright red map while realizing that it could well mean a 62-63 GOP Senate majority.
I plan to enjoy each of those 463 days as the map just keeps getting redder.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | October 14, 2011 at 08:03 PM
JiB:
How much of OWS is helping Obama poll numbers.
I've enjoyed Instapundit's pimping of "President Goldman Sachs" for more than just the hits it's given me. The OWSies' rage should eventually turn on him (if we can keep their attention on being outraged long enough).
For example,I steered him toward the JWF post today where Mike Lupica,frothing liberal,was openly questioning why the OWSies aren't protesting at the WH too.
Must keep OWSies enraged....(I'll again say it -- if the Koch brothers aren't helping fund the occupiers . . . they should be)
Posted by: hit and run | October 14, 2011 at 08:14 PM
Hit,
What i am afraid of is that some stupid turd (either a politician or a OWS eegit) will follow up on Donny Deutch's aspiration for a Kent State redux. Of course the NYPD is much better trained and led than the poor Ohio National Guard back then but just he same, the only way this ends good for the occupiers, the Dems, Sorry-os and the JEF is for a little tangential or direct violence that they can pin on "stupid actions" by the cops or some retired tea party member with one of those poison dart canes.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | October 14, 2011 at 08:54 PM
Hit,
What i am afraid of is that some stupid turd (either a politician or a OWS eegit) will follow up on Donny Deutch's aspiration for a Kent State redux. Of course the NYPD is much better trained and led than the poor Ohio National Guard back then but just he same, the only way this ends good for the occupiers, the Dems, Sorry-os and the JEF is for a little tangential or direct violence that they can pin on "stupid actions" by the cops or some retired tea party member with one of those poison dart canes.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | October 14, 2011 at 09:00 PM
It just seems like several trillion.
You're thinking of dollars of debt from President Net Spending Cut.
Speaking of which, the debt has increased by four billion, two hundred fifty nine million, seven hundred eighty six thousand, six hundred forty eight dollars per day during his glorious reign.
Posted by: bgates | October 14, 2011 at 09:11 PM
Just arrived in Milano and turned on the tube and it is CNN---Piers whatshisface interviewing Sean Penn. I have to say it is a tough choice deciding what is Sean Penn's finer quality--his looks or his brains.
Posted by: daddy | October 14, 2011 at 09:20 PM
And then there's Obama's gun retailer remarks to Sarah and Jim Brady on March 30th, 2011...
http://patdollard.com/2011/05/obama-were-working-on-gun-control-under-the-radar/
This article was posted May 26th, 2011
Posted by: OldTimer | October 14, 2011 at 09:21 PM
bombing Clinton ordered when he was flying back from Israel
Wasn't it Martha's Vineyard? On the day Monica returned to the grand jury in August 98?
Posted by: Ralph L Jane | October 14, 2011 at 09:29 PM
I thought it was Israel. At any rate it was about a week before Christmas. I was in New Orleans. Fun times!
Posted by: Jane | October 14, 2011 at 09:36 PM
Jane,
I have visions of midnight oil burning at the Pentagon as invasion plans for Paraguay, Andorra and Tonga are dusted off and reviewed.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | October 14, 2011 at 09:49 PM
Isn't there some genuinely gratuitous Berlusconi programming on over there.
Posted by: narciso | October 14, 2011 at 09:53 PM
mel & others-
Yes this does fit into my story. OMG somebody must be upset with how sloppy they are with the template.
Here's the motto-use the veneer of capitalism plus govt power. Now each of us should think about what that combo and what we know of our respective industries and specialties could do or should fear if that's the operating motto. And then listen to the news.
It is the ingenuity of human beings that is feared.
Let's be collectively and collaboratively ingenious just for spite. Anybody else in?
Posted by: rse | October 14, 2011 at 09:53 PM
rse-
Unfortunately, I'm armed with all thumbs when under pressure for this stuff. Throw economics at me and I'll answer faster, and simpler, than most, probably not Rick or Iggy, but most.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | October 14, 2011 at 10:03 PM
December 98 would have been the bombing right before the House impeachment vote, which mysteriously ended right after they finished voting.
Posted by: Ralph L Jane | October 14, 2011 at 10:03 PM
rse, I'm in. Ingenuity is what I'm supposed to be up to everyday as is. Unfortunately making it easier for firms to comply with big business and government regs (the focus of my efforts) may be the opposite of what you are suggesting. So I am open to suggestions.
Posted by: henry | October 14, 2011 at 10:11 PM
as invasion plans for Paraguay, Andorra and Tonga are dusted off and reviewed.
Please God...let it be someplace with nice beaches and acceptable warbrides.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 14, 2011 at 10:18 PM
Ok, I weenied out too early. I'll stomp in with all thumbs and a size 12 mouth.
What's up your sleeve?
(I can do the mass conference call. I have accounts for that.)
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | October 14, 2011 at 10:19 PM
You're not under pressure on my end Mel. We have coordination going on if we will only look back and think about what we are respectively hearing.
We have so much expertise chatting with each other here. We have lives but lots of people primarily have aspirations using govt power. Knowing that going into 2012 we need to call out what we notice.
Posted by: rse | October 14, 2011 at 10:22 PM
Speaking of doing the time warp, OT but Mr. Porch is playing a wedding in Houston tonight, and Pamela des Barres is the girlfriend of the opener (a friend of theirs). They are all hanging out on the patio. He says she looks pretty good for a 63 year old groupie.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 14, 2011 at 10:25 PM
Rick,
It's Uganda. What a joke.
Ralph, It was his only out at the time. I've been paying far too much attention for far too long.
Posted by: Jane | October 14, 2011 at 10:29 PM
Ah, so tidbits like new fed/state reporting formats might contain clues about what is coming next. (things like the universal 1099 stuff happen all the time, generally under the radar).
Posted by: henry | October 14, 2011 at 10:34 PM
Why does anybody pitch to Pujols?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | October 14, 2011 at 10:35 PM
But we are a bit of an echo chamber, rse, I do my best to influence the press, but the MFM is not open to dissent.
I taught someone Monday, in a 15 minute car ride, just how broad the real estate crises will impact her brand spanking new, and genuinely ingenious, acute care facilities. I'm going to do my best to work with this genius, but it will have to be done cleverly, for her, and for us. Clear the boards of the pay-to-play carp, and the economy will recover faster than under Reagan. It's there. I've met the owners, in several places.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | October 14, 2011 at 10:36 PM
Just for fun.
About 3 hours ago came in from Cologne to Milan. We were landing about 1 AM, but the moon was almost full and in the clear night you could see wonderfully well. We arrived from the west heading east.
On such a clear night with the lights off in the cockpit, the lights on the ground beautifully delineate roads and towns. Just prior to the Alps we observed an area of darkness within a surrounded large oval of lights which had to be a lake, and if I knew the geography better over here I could say it was lake Geneva or Como or whatever but please excuse my ignorance---regardless, it was gorgeous. The mountains appeared topped with snow.
Descent into Milan from the west was fun. You are kept quite high because of the Alps, then plummet down steeply as there is precious little going on at 1 AM, and you have freedom to do pretty much what you want at such an hour. We were given an eastbound heading and then allowed to make our own call for a left 180 degree turn back to the Milan airport. Smooth. beautiful, calm conditions. You folks all would have loved it.
Taxi in to the hotel is about 40 minutes, so we had the taxi guy stop at some market place 30 minutes from Milan, and we dashed in and bought a couple bottles of vino for the layover. Our body clocks at 2 am local are still about Martini time back home, so at whatever place we stopped he led us to the wine selection and we picked up Valpolicella. (Tad rougher than the French Merlot last night). Popped the cork in the car and then had to swill to be finito by arrival hotel. My partner this evening mentioned how it is wrong to have to swill wine like beer in order to finish quick, and he was absolutely correct, but what ya' gonna' do at 2 am in Molano. Breaks of Naval Air...
Anyhow, am not a fan of Valpoicello at the moment, but half the 2nd bottle is still over on my nightstand next to me and don't want to say that out loud in order to avoid a hangover tomorrow.
Taxi driver mentioned 3 tourist choices for tomorrow---
1) The Duomo Cathedral
2) Leonardo's "Last Supper"
3) The place where Il Duce was hung with his mistress
As my pop was a WW2 guy who did Anzio and Rome etc, I may do the last of those 3. He would always say to us kids when things were going to hell, "Finito Benito," at which point Momma (Grandma Jane) would always pipe in with schoolmarmish exasperation, "FenitA' Benito, FenitA' Benito. FenitA!!!" as if our mispronouncing "Fenita" in joking about the hanging of that fascist creep we would somehow reveal ourselves to our betters as uncouth Americans. Gad does that make me laugh, but I s'pose you have to have been there or have had a bottle and a half of Valpolicello in ya' to make sense of it.
"Finito Benito!" Ha! Take that Grandma Jane:) Bless your good soul. Ciao.
Posted by: daddy | October 14, 2011 at 10:36 PM
"Please God...let it be someplace with nice beaches and acceptable warbrides"
I second that prayer.
Posted by: Clarice | October 14, 2011 at 10:37 PM
Jane-it's not a joke if you're a relative. It just hurts that someone with that much power has no real guiding compass. Except organizing the community.
If you like books it's always hard to forget the end of All Quiet on the Western Front.
Posted by: rse | October 14, 2011 at 10:38 PM
Pamela des Barres is the girlfriend of the opener (a friend of theirs)
You may want to check his underwear for traces of plaster of paris.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 14, 2011 at 10:39 PM
My dad(wwII vet) always told this joke:
Why did the new Italian Navy build glass bottom boats?
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 14, 2011 at 10:41 PM
daddy-
White Sardines. Have them just once for "Primi".
And never ignore the "Funghi".
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | October 14, 2011 at 10:44 PM
So they could see the Old Italian Navy.
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 14, 2011 at 10:46 PM
Danube, "Pujols". That calls for a Cold refreshing Bud, go Cards!
Posted by: henry | October 14, 2011 at 10:46 PM
To see the old Italian Navy!
Shortest book in history? The Complete Guide to Italian Military Victories.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 14, 2011 at 10:47 PM
BTW,
Here's Il Duomo
Here's Leonardo's "Last Supper"
And here's Il Duce Hanging Upside Down.
Decisions, decisions...Mucho' diffichili!
Posted by: daddy | October 14, 2011 at 10:53 PM
daddy, it was Lake Como, about a 30 minute ride from Milan --or used to be--and one of my favorite spots on earth.
Posted by: Clarice | October 14, 2011 at 10:54 PM
BTW it was on the shores of that Lake that finito Benito (and Clarita) took place.
Posted by: Clarice | October 14, 2011 at 10:55 PM
I thought it was on a lamppost in a Shell station in Milan. Or were the bodies taken there from the lake shore? I still remember sitting in the theatre with my sister watching the Movietone News film of the bodies dangling upside down.
Watching Glenn Beck on O'Reilly. He reminds me a lot of the John Birchers of fifty years ago, and the book "None Dare Call it Treason."
Posted by: Danube of Thought | October 14, 2011 at 11:10 PM
OOps it was ClarETTA Petacci.
Posted by: Clarice | October 14, 2011 at 11:10 PM
I believe they were ambushed and killed along the shore and then hung at the Shell station,
Posted by: Clarice | October 14, 2011 at 11:11 PM
Done.
G'night. I had my heart wrench worked a bit looser today. It goes back up Sunday.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | October 14, 2011 at 11:13 PM
Do you know what Mussolin's first job was?
Wealthy Jews hired him to be principal of a Montessori schol they sponsored for the children of the poor.
Posted by: Clarice | October 14, 2011 at 11:13 PM
BE aware that Holder, back in 2009, bragged about Fast and Furious at an Arms Trafficking conference in Cuernavaca,
http://sadhillnews.com/2011/07/09/eric-holder-bragged-about-operation-gunrunner-in-2009
this kind of torpedoes any BS about hearing of it in 2011, no?
Posted by: John Cunningham | October 14, 2011 at 11:14 PM
Daddy,
You have the most interesting job. Can I go to "take your (older than you) daughter to work, day?
Posted by: Jane | October 14, 2011 at 11:15 PM
Jane, you wretched poacher, I made that suggestion years ago.I was willing to go in an air hole punched package marked instruments fragile.
Posted by: Clarice | October 14, 2011 at 11:18 PM
Wealthy Jews hired him to be principal of a Montessori schol they sponsored for the children of the poor.
I didn't know that, but it makes sense in some ways. Young Mussolini was very idealistic, which is probably what drove him to socialism.
I could see Barry as a grade school principal at some tony private school. Just have to keep him from going out back to smoke a doobie with the utes.
Posted by: Soylent Red | October 14, 2011 at 11:20 PM
John-
Do you think you're going to get away with a "seagull" move without expressing other cogent opinions?
That one, alone, is well worth backing up why you know that tidbit.
Cough up.
(Pretty Please!)
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | October 14, 2011 at 11:22 PM
Obama sez:
" Now, having said that, I think none of us are under any illusion that reinstating that ban would be easy. And so, what we've focused on is how we can improve our enforcement of existing laws, because even under current law, trafficking illegal firearms, sending them across a border, is illegal. That's something that we can stop.
And so our focus is to work with Secretary Napolitano, Attorney General Holder, our entire Homeland Security team, ATF, border security, everybody who is involved in this, to coordinate with our counterparts in Mexico to significantly ramp up our enforcement of existing laws. And in fact, I've asked Eric Holder to do a complete review of how our enforcement operations are currently working and make sure that we're cutting down on the loopholes that are resulting in some of these drug trafficking problems."
Calderon sez:
"
One more thing -- one more thing I forgot to mention. One other thing we can do is to track the weapons that we have in Mexico. If we manage to detect weapons sold illegally in the United States in violation of this law on the control of weapons exports, or if, in the United States, they can have -- probably move forward on a good registry of armament or on the prohibition of certain massive sales of weapons, for example, to a hunter or to a common citizen -- we know that these people do not usually buy hundreds of rifles or assault weapons or grenades -- if we can move forward in those areas, I do believe that security both of the United States and Mexico will improve because those weapons are pointing against Mexican people and Mexican officials today.
But crime is not only acting in Mexico. It is also acting in the United States. Organized crime is acting in both countries. And I do hope that those weapons that are sold today in the United States and are being used in Mexico, I hope the day will never come in which they will also be used against the North American society or against U.S. officials, just like they are now being used in Mexico."
How intuitive. When did this conversation occur?
April 16, 2009.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/joint-press-conference-with-president-barack-obama-and-president-felipe-calderon-me
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 14, 2011 at 11:28 PM
Wrong, JohnC: keep your eye on the ball. Having knowledge of Gunrunner (or of Wide Receiver) is not the same as having knowedge of Fast and Furious.
We don't wanna go all Glenn Beck here.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | October 14, 2011 at 11:29 PM