Right on schedule Paul Krugman commences to cheerlead for the Obama recovery.
I happen to agree with the mainstream view that a US recovery seems to be underway. But this from the Persecuted Prognosticator drew my eye:
On housing: as everyone now knows (but oh, the abuse heaped on anyone pointing it out while it was happening!), we had a monstrous housing bubble between 2000 and 2006. Home prices soared, and there was clearly a lot of overbuilding. When the bubble burst, construction — which had been the economy’s main driver during the alleged “Bush boom” — plunged.
First, let's pause a moment and imagine the plight of a persecuted Times pundit who spent the Bush years, well, bashing Bush. It must have gotten lonely.
And let's replay (yet again!) his Nostradamus-like insight into the housing bubble, offered in May of 2006:
Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, contends that what's happening in the housing market is "a very orderly and moderate kind of cooling." Maybe he's right. But if he isn't, the stock market drop of the last two days will be remembered as the start of a serious economic slowdown.
Maybe the bubble will end with "a serious slowdown", or maybe not. Golly, I bet he did get abused for that. Of course, I don't see his predictions of a trillion dollar Federal bail-out of Fannie, Freddie and the US financial system, but maybe that is par for a "serious slowdown."
And while we're here, let's pick up on his admission that "Home prices soared, and there was clearly a lot of overbuilding". This seems to represent backtracking from what Krugman described as "one of the best pure-economic pieces I’ve done in my tenure at the Times". As Krugman explained in the referenced 2005 piece, in areas where lots of building is possible, home prices don't tend to rise - instead, new construction meets the new demand. Fair enough, but... Krugman then went off the rails, for example in this 2010 column, by arguing thusly:
To appreciate Georgia’s specialness, you need to realize that the housing bubble was a geographically uneven affair. Basically, prices rose sharply only where zoning restrictions and other factors limited the construction of new houses. In the rest of the country — what I once dubbed Flatland — permissive zoning and abundant land make it easy to increase the housing supply, a situation that prevented big price increases and therefore prevented a serious bubble.
Most of the post-bubble hangover is concentrated in states where home prices soared, then fell back to earth, leaving many homeowners with negative equity — houses worth less than their mortgages. It’s no accident that Florida, Nevada and Arizona lead the nation in both negative equity and mortgage delinquencies; prices more than doubled in Miami, Las Vegas and Phoenix, and have subsequently suffered some of the biggest declines.
As I pointed out at the time, Krugman's notion that price collapses couldn't follow an era of high construction failed to recognize that decreases in housing supply are not nearly as easily managed as increases. Typically, developers cut prices rather than bulldoze new construction (or any other existing housing stock), so the supply curve is quite inelastic on the way down.
Now, one might have thought that Las Vegas, cited above, was an example of a city that saw a lot of new construction yet experienced price collapses. Not so fast! In a 2006 post, Krugman explained that land use restraints limited construction there. Hmm - the numbers I dredged up (p. 9) showed that total housing units in Las Vegas rose from 559,799 to 819,600 from 2008 to 2009, an increase of 46%; by way of comparson, the housing stock in New York and Los Angeles rose by 4.7 and 3.1% over a similar period. And this report tells us about the Atlanta region:
The vast majority of housing available in the Atlanta region has been constructed over the past 40 years. In fact more than 20 percent of the housing stock in the Atlanta region was built between 2000 and 2007.
So Las Vegas had notably more new construction than Atlanta (on a percentage basis), yet to preserve his "best" effort Krugman wants to imagine that his model correctly places Las Vegas with LA and New York as tightly zoned areas distinct from places like Atlanta, where construction is easy. This is reality-based?
Well, we do have his current admission that overbuilding can be a problem, so we see him toddling towards the truth.
WHAT WERE ONCE VICES ARE NOW VIRTUES: I love to death Krugman's explanation of how the Obama recovery might take hold:
And after a protracted slump in housing starts, America now looks seriously underprovided with houses, at least by historical standards.
...
So why aren’t people going out and buying? Because the depressed state of the economy leaves many people who would normally be buying homes either unable to afford them or too worried about job prospects to take the risk.
But the economy is depressed, in large part, because of the housing bust, which immediately suggests the possibility of a virtuous circle: an improving economy leads to a surge in home purchases, which leads to more construction, which strengthens the economy further, and so on. And if you squint hard at recent data, it looks as if something like that may be starting: home sales are up, unemployment claims are down, and builders’ confidence is rising.
Now, this notion that the US economy could ride the housing market to recovery until other horses took over was the strategy employed in the 2002-2006 bubble era, and in fact, was the strategy advocated by Paul Krugman in 2001. But since we are now, by some uncited standard, "seriously underprovided" with housing, well, away we go again. And this time, unlike the 80's or the 00's, a real estate boom won't be followed by a real estate crash. No, I don't know why not either - perhaps because geniuses like Krugman will warn us in time that things may end badly, unless they don't.
I thought Ground Hog Day was February 2nd?
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 23, 2012 at 01:46 PM
Now, you know TM, it's absolutely savage to use Krugman's own words against him, what kind of a sadist are you?
Posted by: narciso | January 23, 2012 at 01:47 PM
This News. It does not mean what you think it does. LUN
Posted by: matt | January 23, 2012 at 01:51 PM
I'm not sure what potential home buyers worry about more: the possibility of losing their jobs as Krugman seems to think is the case, or, as I think is a bigger problem, the fear that housing prices will collapse even further due to the backlog in processing foreclosures and the impact of millions of underwater homeowners potentially walking away from their mortgages or having government redraw their mortgages.
Posted by: steve | January 23, 2012 at 02:21 PM
Why does TM hate Pauly so, that he feels the need to destroy him on a biweekly basis?
Oh yeah, 'cause Pauly's a jerk.
Posted by: Ignatz | January 23, 2012 at 02:23 PM
Ed Henry asks Carney the important question of the day.
And the answer tells you all you need to know:)
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 23, 2012 at 02:32 PM
JiB, we have a non-denial.
And FNC can't find someone to edit their articles who's beyond 8th grade and doesn't think that "alot" is a word?
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | January 23, 2012 at 02:51 PM
Our host has a Krugman obsession. Or maybe he thinks shooting fish in a barrel is sport.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | January 23, 2012 at 02:55 PM
Steve-- it doesn't matter why people aren't buying homes-- the pertinent point is they are not. That is one of the many reasons that exposes the BS that Krugman is pushing. And what BS is that? "properity is just around the corner"-- "Barry and Timmie and Bernie have this covered", "re-elect Barry adn all will be fine." It's the same BS as 2008, Hope and Change and Unicorns.
Posted by: NK | January 23, 2012 at 02:56 PM
I thought from the header we were talking about Senator Rand Paul now in TSA custody.
Posted by: clarice feldman | January 23, 2012 at 02:58 PM
DoT-- I disagree; Krugman has the obsession of re-writing history to try to prove he was right-- back then. Our host is doing a public service in showing Krugman is full of poo.
Posted by: NK | January 23, 2012 at 02:59 PM
JiB-- that's a fascinating link-- it really is a non-denial from Carney. So no Churchill bust, but an Alinsky portrait. Pathetic.
Posted by: NK | January 23, 2012 at 03:01 PM
A Nobel-prize winning economist should understand that a real recovery will boost housing, not the other way around.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 23, 2012 at 03:06 PM
jimmyk- OK now you're confusing Krugman's column with facts. That is not prohibited in Krugman's universe.
Posted by: NK | January 23, 2012 at 03:07 PM
.. That is not PERMITTED in Krugman's universe....
Posted by: NK | January 23, 2012 at 03:09 PM
So JF Kerry shows up at the WH with a broken nose and two black eyes. His spokesman says it was an ice hockey contest. Do you believe it?
Posted by: clarice | January 23, 2012 at 03:26 PM
1 Chaco, 4 MayBee's, and a victory for lovers of the Constitution.
Posted by: daddy | January 23, 2012 at 03:35 PM
C, John Kerry was chairman of the Senate foreign Relations Committee when John Kriakou was hired as an investigator for the committee. Former CIA agent Kriakou had his first appearence in Federal Court today .
Posted by: BB Key | January 23, 2012 at 03:39 PM
I am the only one here who actually ever shot a fish?
Posted by: MarkO | January 23, 2012 at 03:40 PM
Smallest violin in the word, so why isn't Shane on the chopping block;
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/120123/former-cia-officer-john-kirikaou-charged-media-l
Posted by: narciso | January 23, 2012 at 03:44 PM
In Paul’s Monday statement, he noted, “my ‘Restore America Plan,’ in additional to cutting $1 trillion dollars in one year, eliminates the TSA.”
As the Kinks famously sang, "Yeah. You really got me now."
Posted by: MarkO | January 23, 2012 at 03:45 PM
Heh. He must have asked Teresa for an increase in his allowance.
Posted by: Barbara | January 23, 2012 at 03:48 PM
Why hasn't there been more buzz about this;
http://news.yahoo.com/cia-indictment-highlights-murky-ties-between-reporters-intel-150123681.html
Posted by: narciso | January 23, 2012 at 03:53 PM
Last week we learned that Scientists are intending to aggressively promote the propagandizing of manmade Global Warming to America's Schoolkids: The organization of scientists, anthropologists and others is turning its attention to climate change, and it will mount an aggressive effort to teach the nation's schoolchildren that climate change is real and is being driven by human activity.
Today we learn that a new organization called Forecast The Facts (funded by whom we don't yet know) is going to aggressively promote reporting of Global Warming by News Weathermen. Forecast the Facts (www.forecastthefacts.org), launches Sunday to pressure TV meteorologists to inform their viewers about climate change:
"The launch coincides with the kick-off of the American Meteorological Society’s (AMS) annual meeting in New Orleans, LA."
“This is an important moment in the history of the AMS,” said Daniel Souweine, the campaign’s director. “It’s well known that large numbers of meteorologists are climate change deniers. It’s essential that the AMS Council resist pressure from these deniers and pass the strong statement currently under consideration.”
Posted by: daddy | January 23, 2012 at 03:53 PM
Potential buyers may get frozen out of the market in order to let government have a big Program that proves they are Doing Something and (surprise!) results in letting the cronies win at the expense of the rest of us (LUN).
Posted by: Jim,MtnViewCA,USA | January 23, 2012 at 03:57 PM
“It’s well known that large numbers of meteorologists are climate change deniers."
Off with their heads. The science is settled and that's why we have science.
Posted by: MarkO | January 23, 2012 at 03:58 PM
--I am the only one here who actually ever shot a fish?--
No.
And mine were the free range variety, not caged in a barrel.
Posted by: Ignatz | January 23, 2012 at 04:10 PM
Golly, it seems Senator Mark Kirk's stroke was more serious that initially reported.
Posted by: centralcal | January 23, 2012 at 04:12 PM
Did Krugman mean to tell the truth?
Housing Bubble from 2000 - 2006? Who was President in 2000? Wasn't it a Democrat that was in office then? How did Bush cause a housing bubble before he was even elected?
Posted by: JAFAC | January 23, 2012 at 04:15 PM
narciso,
I just read that earlier and wondered who this guy is. He must hurt Obama or it would be splashed on every newspaper in the free world.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 04:15 PM
Everyone knows Bush can do things other men can't.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 04:21 PM
"showed that total housing units in Las Vegas rose from 559,799 to 819,600 from 2008 to 2009, an increase of 46%"
Should be 2000 to 2009. The 5.8% annual rate of increase is perfectly coincidental with the rate of increase in resident employment.
If one wished to actually test the Flatlander hypothesis, I'd suggest looking at Seattle metro versus Dallas metro. Boredom with the subject prevents me from doing so but comparing a major Blue Hell to a minor Blue Hell isn't going to ever going to be particularly convincing.
Krugman is trying to strike sparks to ignite a housing recovery that is not going to flower until 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue has a new tenant.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 23, 2012 at 04:23 PM
It serves up a very interesting tale, I guess
'speaking truth to power' is inoperative now;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/documents/john-kiriakou-criminal-complaint.html
Posted by: narciso | January 23, 2012 at 04:32 PM
--Krugman is trying to strike sparks to ignite a housing recovery that is not going to flower until 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue has a new tenant.--
Rick,
I'd say the housing recovery Krugman or Barry are primarily interested in igniting in 2012 is at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, IYKWIM.
Posted by: Ignatz | January 23, 2012 at 04:33 PM
So JF Kerry shows up at the WH with a broken nose and two black eyes. His spokesman says it was an ice hockey contest. Do you believe it?
The hockey thing? Not for a minute. As to the condition of his face, I'd say it's only a good start.
Posted by: lyle | January 23, 2012 at 04:44 PM
Sorry if already posted, but you guys will enjoy this - John Kerry "breaks nose playing hockey."
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/01/23/john-kerry-breaks-nose-playing-hockey/
I put it in quotes because I can think of another reason why he would have two black eyes and a swollen nose. Check out the photo at the link. Nose looks decidedly less beaky to me.
Comments are hilarious.
Posted by: Porchlight | January 23, 2012 at 04:48 PM
OMG, sorry to not have read the thread more closely.
To make up for it here is a pic:
Looks pretty cut and dried to me. Pun intended
Posted by: Porchlight | January 23, 2012 at 04:51 PM
I think someone is worried that Obama will be tied to Alinsky. I see they are rehabilitating Alinsky even as I type...he wasn't a socialist, he didn't want to change our system, Newt is more like Alinsky than he knows, yada yada...
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 04:52 PM
Hey, did y'all know John Kerry was in Vietnam?
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 04:54 PM
Here is Kiriakou's Linked page.
"Second Secretary, Economic Affairs
US Embassy
Government Agency; 1-10 employees; International Affairs industry
1994 – 1996 (2 years)"
I wonder which embassy? or is that a DC post?
Posted by: Janet | January 23, 2012 at 05:00 PM
I would say, Athens, right off the back, from what I glanced from his memoir.which
means he was sent there, after Valerie was 'burned' by Ames.
Posted by: narciso | January 23, 2012 at 05:04 PM
Sue-
Hear he's got one of them funny, magical hats too.
Posted by: RichatUF | January 23, 2012 at 05:05 PM
So some hockey guy punched out Francoise Kerry? I would have paid to see it.
Posted by: GMAX | January 23, 2012 at 05:05 PM
Kerry chased a North Vietnamese teen in a loincloth down and killed him, but not before the teen was able to give him a black eye.
Posted by: Jim Ryan | January 23, 2012 at 05:06 PM
Education -
"John Kiriakou's Education
The George Washington University
MA, Legislative Affairs
1986 – 1988
The George Washington University
BA, Middle Eastern Studies
1982 – 1986 "
The Saudi's love GWU, right? "nearly $13 million to George Washington University,"
Posted by: Janet | January 23, 2012 at 05:07 PM
Guess who wrote that original story on the Waterboarding, our good friend Brian Ross,
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=3978231&page=1#.Tx3ZhoF-jcs
Who would later go on to reveal the 'black prisons' in Europe and N. Africa.
Posted by: narciso | January 23, 2012 at 05:08 PM
I just read that earlier and wondered who this guy is. He must hurt Obama or it would be splashed on every newspaper in the free world.
Sorry for posting this in two threads, but I didn't notice if anyone commented on the game itself:
Heh. The WaPo and their reporter, Greg Miller, seem to know that their readers are mostly dumb enough to fall for another game of ... Name That Party!
Former CIA officer charged in alleged leaks
Not one mention of party affiliation in the piece, but I got to it via Drudge, who headlined it more helpfully:
Posted by: Extraneus | January 23, 2012 at 05:10 PM
Catching up, I just saw Boris's [I hope the punctuation is right] great guitar work. Did he take lessons from PUK?
Posted by: Jim Rhoads a/k/a vnjagvet | January 23, 2012 at 05:10 PM
I went over the Scary's place but he isn't commenting on it yet. At moment, he is in meltdown mode over Gingrich's win in SC.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:13 PM
This story for which Kirikaou was likely a source was even a thread here;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/21/AR2009042104055.html
Posted by: narciso | January 23, 2012 at 05:14 PM
Ex,
Should have known.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:15 PM
So some hockey guy punched out Francoise Kerry?
If by "hockey guy" you mean "plastic surgeon," then the answer is yes.
Posted by: Porchlight | January 23, 2012 at 05:15 PM
Wow Janet. The Saudis give a fortune to G'town too.
Posted by: rse | January 23, 2012 at 05:16 PM
What a BS story.
I played "no check" hockey for years while in my 40's and 50's and the only time one of us got hurt was when we tripped and fell into the boards. But even then its hard to get black eyes and busted nose when you are wearing helmets, face guards and caged masks. What a phony.
Its called plastic surgery.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 23, 2012 at 05:17 PM
I think narciso linked to an LI post that linked to Reagan's "There you go again" youtube in another thread, but I didn't remember what Carter was talking about that gave rise to that retort:
National Health Insurance
Every one of Carter's arguments was used by Obama and the Democrats in the most recent health care debate.
It took them decades. They don't ever give up.
Posted by: Extraneus | January 23, 2012 at 05:17 PM
I know this is an old story, but this guy is like Kevin Bacon;
http://motherjones.com/politics/2007/12/operation-stop-talking
Posted by: narciso | January 23, 2012 at 05:17 PM
Ex,
The case against John Kiriakou, who served as a senior Senate aide after ending his CIA career, extends the Obama administration's unprecedented crackdown on disclosures of national security secrets to journalists.
This is how the WaPo is reporting it. I am shaking my head wondering what they would be saying if Bush and Gonzales were in charge.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:18 PM
In other news, the Bruins goalie snubs Obama and admits it's political. He is a staunch conservative.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:19 PM
A traitor working for JFK? How can that be?
Posted by: clarice feldman | January 23, 2012 at 05:19 PM
Maybe Kerry got his black eye from Kiriakou?
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:24 PM
I love that Bruin's goalie, Sue. Good for him.
Isn't John Effin Kerry a little old for a nose job?
Posted by: centralcal | January 23, 2012 at 05:25 PM
C-cal,
I have mixed feelings about snubbing the POTUS. I love that he feels the same way I do, but I would rather he just not attend and keep his reasons to himself. If others want to guess at it, fine, but that's just me. Respect the office even if the fool in the office doesn't respect it. Or me.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:27 PM
If it was plastic surgery, why in heaven's name didn't he do something about that mega-chin!?!
Posted by: Janet | January 23, 2012 at 05:28 PM
Who was Kiriakou an aide for?
Posted by: Jane | January 23, 2012 at 05:29 PM
My wife just mentioned that Kerry has submitted an application for another Purple Heart.
Posted by: Extraneus | January 23, 2012 at 05:29 PM
Janet,
He has had work done on his chin a few years ago. I think he even admitted it, but claimed it was for medical purposes.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:29 PM
The chin is probably next. It looks even bigger now next to the new nose.
Posted by: Porchlight | January 23, 2012 at 05:32 PM
Who was Kiriakou an aide for?
I think he was an aide in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
"Senior Staff Member
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
March 2009 – May 2011 (2 years 3 months) "
I wonder who recommended him for the job & who hired him.
Posted by: Janet | January 23, 2012 at 05:33 PM
One report said he was an investigator to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Which John Effin Kerry chairs. So...guilt by association is just fine with me.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:36 PM
Seriously, if you've already had your chin scaled down, just how large was it before?
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:37 PM
Larry Summers. It's just what we thought, or in coach-speak, they are what we thought they were.
http://blog.american.com/2012/01/11-stunning-revelations-from-larry-summers-secret-economics-memo-to-barack-obama/
Posted by: MarkO | January 23, 2012 at 05:39 PM
--He has had work done on his chin a few years ago.--
Pre op pic;

Posted by: Ignatz | January 23, 2012 at 05:41 PM
Mona Kerry -
Posted by: Janet | January 23, 2012 at 05:42 PM
LOL.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:44 PM
I knew I had seen that picture before, Porch.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 23, 2012 at 05:45 PM
Comments are hilarious.
Quite definitely worth a quick click. Glad to know I'm not alone in my loathing of that dick.
Posted by: lyle | January 23, 2012 at 05:45 PM
Janet,
You are wicked:)
Did you'all read about the Navy SEAL who was arrested and put in the psych ward at Bellevue because he said he was a Navy SEAL, which he turned out to be? Bloomberg gone mad, mad, mad.
Oh, he had a pickup truck with a gun in it. So, according to the NYPD - he was the crazy one.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 23, 2012 at 05:48 PM
Narciso,
How about #1 of those "11 stunning revelations"?
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:50 PM
The short-run economic imperative was to identify as many campaign promisesor high priority items that would spend out quickly and be inherently temporary. … The stimulus package is a key tool for advancing clean energy goals and fulfilling a number of campaign commitments.
Glad my money was put to good use for Obama's campaign promises.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2012 at 05:52 PM
Obama Defends Roe v. Wade As Way for ‘Our Daughters’ to Have Same Chance As Sons to ‘Fulfill Their Dreams’
I assume that Obama understands what our sons' dreams are at that age.(Btw, mine showed me the dozens of parody videos that have cropped up in the week since the original went viral. The kid has an agent, shirts already on sale, has been to Canada for interviews, etc.)
Posted by: Extraneus | January 23, 2012 at 05:53 PM
one of the paramount skills of a good politician is to take a difficult question and answer another question, often hypothetical, entirely.
I believe the Republicans would be well served to do so during their upcoming debates. Each should take at topic where the Obama administration is weak, and when a question is asked, address that, rather than the question.
No attack dog politics, and a message that can be honed debate after debate. It would drive the moderators and pundits nuts. As the MSM do their best to tear apart each of the candidates the only beneficiary is the clown who will be giving the SOTU campaign speech tomorrow night.
Posted by: matt | January 23, 2012 at 05:59 PM
MarkO--"...they are what we thought they were" Exactly right-- even Summers is just a shameless political hack. We are on the hook for $1.1 TRILLION in debt (including %) so 'Bam could deliver the bacon to his crony contributors. People should go to jail for this.
Posted by: NK | January 23, 2012 at 06:03 PM
Sarah Palin in an interview with Eric Bolling about Chris Cristie's Newt is an embarrassment to the party remark:
Posted by: centralcal | January 23, 2012 at 06:04 PM
How does it feel to get thrown under the bus, John, after fingering your colleagues
and furthering the Journolist meme de jour;
According to a declassified document filed with the court after the Libby trial and obtained by Mother Jones, Kiriakou authored a June 10, 2003, email sent to several CIA officials. The message apparently was written in response to intense efforts at that time by the vice president's office to learn how Plame's husband, Ambassador Joseph Wilson, had been selected to go on a CIA-sponsored fact-finding mission to Niger.
Posted by: narciso | January 23, 2012 at 06:06 PM
On the topic of showing up at the White House and hockey:
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/bruins-mvp-tim-thomas-skips-white-house-event-203636656.html
Obama stole Steve Kasper's number!
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | January 23, 2012 at 06:07 PM
The level of denial required to be a Kerrey spokesman, is prodigious, ask Stephanie Cutter
who graduated to the Obama administration,
Posted by: narciso | January 23, 2012 at 06:19 PM
FYI -- Sara's son left us an update in the Sunday Morning thread...
Posted by: hit and run | January 23, 2012 at 06:20 PM
No, Hit it was Sara's daughter and she also left the same update in the I Absolutely Cannot Wait thread....
Posted by: centralcal | January 23, 2012 at 06:24 PM
Apogolgies, Hit - maybe it is her Son - thought I had seen the word daughter - apparently not! yikes
Posted by: centralcal | January 23, 2012 at 06:29 PM
Fish on the range?
Posted by: MarkO | January 23, 2012 at 06:34 PM
CC,
Whatever, he/she is not a Mitt fan and I wonder how Sara feels about proselytizing us but can't her son:) We are not only Dana's experiment but we are also Sara's.
Already in Florida, we have more people voting early today than all the votes cast so far in Iowa, NH and SC combined. Amazing how much we put into those 3 states while the 4th largest is sitting down there saying "hey, how about me?"
Tonight's debate is Mitts death knell. He has no friends in the audience and he is going for Newt's jugular. Bad move. He should be going for Obama's instead if he wants to win the people on the First Coast.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 23, 2012 at 06:40 PM
White House delay of budget proposal infuriates Republicans
Posted by: Extraneus | January 23, 2012 at 06:43 PM
Another one scratched off the short list.
Pawlenty: Newt Gingrich as a potential nominee for president? Really? I mean, really?
Do these people *still* not get why Gingrich is surging? (Hint: It ain't love of Newt, fools.)
Posted by: Extraneus | January 23, 2012 at 06:48 PM
Man, it is so depressing Extraneus.
Well, JiB - I will be curious to see the audience reaction at the debate tonight. Some of the networks keep a tighter lid on audience expression during debates than others. I am rather betting NBC will do everything in its power to do that tonight.
Posted by: centralcal | January 23, 2012 at 06:52 PM
On topic: Both US and international real estate ETFs are trending up.
Posted by: Extraneus | January 23, 2012 at 06:55 PM
One more time. Audio.
Gov Tim Pawlenty & FL Spkr Des. Will Weatherford: “Newt Gingrich as Nominee? Really?”
Posted by: DJ (for Sara) | January 23, 2012 at 06:55 PM
Whatever, he/she is not a Mitt fan and I wonder how Sara feels about proselytizing us but can't her son:)
Perhaps, you spoke too soon JiB. Sara's offspring is posting links to Romney material (two, within 30 minutes).
Posted by: centralcal | January 23, 2012 at 06:55 PM
Brett Baier can get much better panel participants here than from the A. B. Stoddard kind of crowd who only get their information by hanging around the Occidental or Monocles. She is one of those babes and even wimpy guys I have met in my time back in the day who know only what they pick up over a glass of chardonnay and a pat on the leg. blink, blink:)
We really need to read what the local press is saying in terms of what is going on instead of listening to DC. And I am as guilty as anyone when it comes to not doing it.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | January 23, 2012 at 06:56 PM
And, lo and behold, another one appears.
Posted by: centralcal | January 23, 2012 at 06:56 PM
Walker raised $2.5 million in the second half of December. That will buy lots of ads showing how well his reforms are working.
Posted by: henry | January 23, 2012 at 07:07 PM