As goes Maine, so goes CPAC - let's have the traditional Mitt-mentum open thread. A New England guy winning in New England - breakthrough stuff.
Comments
NK; As usual I agree with you comments.
GMAX: I echo your optimism.
Obama is out of the mainstream that's why he missed the train on this issue and yes squaredance, this is going to hurt him bigtime in November.
Remember the 50 and older crowd has a huge number who have Never used birth control. My sisters and I make 3 in that number.This is a loser issue, the bishops and cardinals won't back down, it will prove to be a game-changer in November. My main goal is to volunteer and try to control the cheating by the dems. Tammany Hall is alive and well with them.
More social justice has come as a result of the commercial marketplace than any other system of economic governance. That is not well understood because it is not taught--not in economics, history, social studies, or philosophy.
Is that willful or myopic. I don't care which. I simply care that anyone who "preaches social justice" as learned dogma compare real-world experiences, not hopeless change.
NK; As usual I agree with you comments.
GMAX: I echo your optimism.
Obama is out of the mainstream that's why he missed the train on this issue and yes squaredance, this is going to hurt him bigtime in November.
Remember the 50 and older crowd has a huge number who have Never used birth control. My sisters and I make 3 in that number.This is a loser issue, the bishops and cardinals won't back down, it will prove to be a game-changer in November. My main goal is to volunteer and try to control the cheating by the dems. Tammany Hall is alive and well with them.
Posted by: maryrose | February 12, 2012 at 04:47 PM
Butt, butt, butt.
Any change?
Posted by: Ignatz | February 12, 2012 at 04:55 PM
"They preach "Social Justice""
More social justice has come as a result of the commercial marketplace than any other system of economic governance. That is not well understood because it is not taught--not in economics, history, social studies, or philosophy.
Is that willful or myopic. I don't care which. I simply care that anyone who "preaches social justice" as learned dogma compare real-world experiences, not hopeless change.
Posted by: sbw | February 12, 2012 at 05:02 PM
@Gmax 12:11: Got it from one of the Virginia Tea Party Patriot people, not (so far as I know) a Ronulan.
Posted by: Another Bob | February 12, 2012 at 05:10 PM
Butt ads? Dont Grayson and Brown qualify in spades?
I'll go ahead and preempively denounce myself for the racism sure to be found in that comment, btw.
Posted by: Stephanie | February 12, 2012 at 05:19 PM
--Butt ads? Dont Grayson and Brown qualify in spades?--
There is a difference in kind not just degree between this;

and this;

that surely anyone can recognize.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 12, 2012 at 06:11 PM
Yeah one is a big @ss and the other is a gaping @sshole. What do I win?
Posted by: Gmax | February 12, 2012 at 06:34 PM
Fat bottom girls they make the rockin' horse go merrily around.
================
Posted by: Baby got back. | February 12, 2012 at 06:43 PM
OMG, what is that outfit on those women? Do they play a sport?
Posted by: Jane | February 12, 2012 at 06:44 PM
Ow.
Posted by: Extraneus | February 12, 2012 at 07:10 PM
--OMG, what is that outfit on those women? Do they play a sport?-
I believe the original was photoshopped, Jane.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 12, 2012 at 07:56 PM
Ahhh, I wonder. Should I be relieved?
Posted by: Jane | February 12, 2012 at 08:02 PM
--Ahhh, I wonder. Should I be relieved?--
You should be relieved you're not that one on the right with the atomic melvin.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 12, 2012 at 08:14 PM
That one chick gto a butt like two volletballs.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | February 12, 2012 at 08:18 PM
Here's a link to the original large format version if anyone wants to study the photoshopping a little more thoroughly.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 12, 2012 at 08:22 PM
sometimes I think the person who invented tights and jeans must feel like blowing his own head off at the sight of some of the wearers.
Posted by: Clarice | February 12, 2012 at 08:24 PM
Well tights were invented for a certain body type, which some have failed to come to grips
with. Meanwhile in a random act of journalism;
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2012/02/12/msnbcs-lawrence-odonnell-pay-no-attention-what-youve-heard-rachel-madd
Posted by: narciso | February 12, 2012 at 08:29 PM
Clarice, this lady down under seems to agree (h/t Tim Blair):
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/no-ifs-or-butts-just-wear-pants/story-e6frezz0-1226266035267
Posted by: jimmyk | February 12, 2012 at 08:58 PM
Whereas some would have no problem with that
circumstance, in the LUN
Posted by: narciso | February 12, 2012 at 09:46 PM