I have been having a mini-flashback to the Don Imus 'nappy-headed hos' debacle of 2007. The Imus comment was utterly gratuitous and not intended to illustrate any broader point, so Don Imus deserves even less latitude. Let's reprise the Bold Words of Candidate Obama.
First, Imus had to go:
"I understand MSNBC has suspended Mr. Imus," Obama told ABC News, "but I would also say that there's nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they made a comment like that about anybody of any ethnic group. And I would hope that NBC ends up having that same attitude."
Well, Sarah Palin is not an ethinic group and Bill Maher is a donor, not a staffer, so Obama has a lot of wiggle room here.
In subsequent comments he explained that really, we are all to blame for hurting Sasha and Malia:
He said as a parent, it was a constant struggle to reinforce his two daughters’ sense of self-esteem.
“I think that all of us have become a little complicit in this kind of relaxed attitude toward some pretty offensive things,” Obama said. “And I hope this prompts some self-reflection on the part of all of us.”
We are all guilty! Which means none of us are. Michelle Malkin noted Obama's flexible attitude towards rappers; I apologized for coarsening the culture but I am embarrassed to admit that I did not step forward and take equal blame with Hollywood, record producers, and the clown posse that awarded an Oscar to "It's Hard Out Here For A Pimp". In fact, I had the temerity to suggest that Barack might want to pick up a clue from Tipper Gore and direct his ire at his friends in Hollywood and the record industry before indicting me.
But I am not shirking my responsibility today! I am not sure how I could explain to Sasha and Malia that their father is taking money from Bill Maher, but I certainly don't want to have to explain why I am such a shamless opportunist and poser.
So before you ask, yes - I am returning any money Bill Maher gave this blog. I am pretty sure that would be $0.00, but since we are all complicit, I think we should all show some accountability. Glad to clear that up.
Over to you, Barack. Sasha and Malia are waiting and wondering.
What Ron White or Bill Engvall weren't available,
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/03/10/alabama-democrats-arent-fundraising-with-bill-maher-theyre-just-using-his-name-and-comedy-tour/
Posted by: narciso | March 10, 2012 at 02:21 PM
I love refunding $0.00! I'm in!
Posted by: centralcal | March 10, 2012 at 02:26 PM
I would hope the American voting public has the same attitude ( about shameless oportunists and posers) as TM. I am pretty sure that is what is showing through in the RAS polling.
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 02:27 PM
I am reminded of Bill C.'s comment on this very blog in January 11, 2011 when he said,
"If it were not for double standards, the left would have no standards at all".
Posted by: Publius from Idaho | March 10, 2012 at 02:27 PM
Let us parse the statute under which Gloria Allread wants Rush prosecuted: it is a misdemeanor for a man, speaking of a woman, "falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want of chastity."
I know this is a bit old-fashioned (so is the statute, which is almost certainly unconstitutional), but hasn't an unmarried woman who admits to a need of $1,000 per year for contraceptives acknowledged a "want of chastity?"
Posted by: Danube of Thought | March 10, 2012 at 02:37 PM
Pretty sharp DoT. Gene Volokh shows why in greater detail Allred is full of it.
As for TM, someone put something in his wheaties this weekend..He's on a roll..
Posted by: Clarice | March 10, 2012 at 02:48 PM
I just had lunch with a conservative friend of mine who keeps very up to date and she had not heard of "critical race theory".
We have more work to do. (And not because it is more important than gas prices and the economy but because it explains so much in this administration.)
Posted by: Jane (get off the couch - come save the country) | March 10, 2012 at 02:50 PM
"all of us have become a little complicit in this kind of relaxed attitude toward some pretty offensive things"
So I guess the president is admitting his relaxed attitude in Maher's and all of the others incredible nasty comments about Palin, Breitbart, Limbaugh and others....maybe he can give us all the finger just one more time while he's at it.
Can anyone e mail me any of the photos of him doing so?
Posted by: matt | March 10, 2012 at 02:52 PM
Take tomorrow's column and mail it to your friends , Jane.
Posted by: Clarice | March 10, 2012 at 02:55 PM
If Bullshit could walk, it would be wearing Obama's shoes.
Posted by: Gus | March 10, 2012 at 02:56 PM
Continetti makes the correct point in the Beacon today:
Since he lacks a significant and popular domestic achievement, the president seems to have concluded that the way to a second term is through the mobilization of key constituencies rather than a broad-based appeal to middle America. He combines these appeals with cheap gimmicks to generate publicity and deflect attention from the Republican primary. Now that his job is in trouble, the man who enthralled millions during the campaign of 2008 has been reduced to just another transactional political panderer. The gloss is off. Even the liberal Washington Post writer Dana Milbank says White House hiring practices make “a joke of the spirit of reform he promised.”
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 02:57 PM
here's a video of it, Matt.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DygBj4Zw6No
Posted by: Clarice | March 10, 2012 at 02:58 PM
can we forget his using the filthy term "teabagger" from his bully pulpit?
Posted by: Chubby | March 10, 2012 at 03:01 PM
((Dana Milbank says White House hiring practices make “a joke of the spirit of reform he promised))
poor Dana was hoodwinked into believing that his idea of of reform and Obama's idea of reform were the one and the same thing
Posted by: Chubby | March 10, 2012 at 03:05 PM
I am going to remind everyone of Mr Ballard's post of about a week or so ago, the sage of JOMland. He points out that over 11 million no longer call the Democrat party home, while the other fun fact is Zero won his fantasmigorical and awesomeness victory by an overwhelming 8 million votes. If I have the numbers wrong I am sure Sir Rick will correct but that is my distinct recollection.
In other words this strategy to sell below cost and make up for it on volume is deeply flawed.
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 03:08 PM
Romney wins 9 delegates in Guam and another 9 delegates in the Northern Marianas Islands yesterday. It's Romney 447 delegates, Santorum 170 delegates, Gingrich 118 delegates, and Paul 67 delegates.
Posted by: Sara | March 10, 2012 at 03:13 PM
Matt, I did this in July 2009, specific to the uprising in Iran:
Posted by: hit and run | March 10, 2012 at 03:14 PM
Jackie Mason will not be able to fill in for Lewis CK. Obama does not like "middle finger" type comedy. It lacks subtlety.
Incorrectly done:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/8912395/Russian-newsreader-fired-after-Obama-middle-finger-insult.html
Correctly done:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DygBj4Zw6No
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 10, 2012 at 03:16 PM
Gmax, don't forget,however,that there are many new first-time voters fresh from being Howard-Zinned and MTVed.
Posted by: Frau Steingehirn | March 10, 2012 at 03:16 PM
Congress Passes Law To Create Anti-Free Speech Bubble Zones Around Members Of Congress
Posted by: Sara | March 10, 2012 at 03:17 PM
I heart Hit & Run.
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 10, 2012 at 03:18 PM
I heart Clarice, too. Did I really take that long to construct my post?
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 10, 2012 at 03:20 PM
I would like it noted that since I agreed to only link any remarkable or noteworthy bottoms [or tops, both partially clothed I might add] I might accidentally run into, this site has descended into a veritable fleshpot of TM posted gals squeezing their chests like a tube of toothpaste, discussions of t***s, c***s, etc and now Sara's over on the other thread describing
and there was some description of some guy doing something to someone's mother that I'm too redfaced to repeat verbatim.
I'd like to submit for consideration that minus the moderation of a few shapely bottoms to quell and satiate man's infernal compulsions things have soon gotten completely out of hand and may only get worse.
Posted by: Ignatz | March 10, 2012 at 03:23 PM
So long as you LUN them, you're good to go with me Ig.
Posted by: Clarice | March 10, 2012 at 03:26 PM
The only safe thing to condemn is cigarettes. :(
Posted by: Janet | March 10, 2012 at 03:28 PM
Oh, and hi everybody. I'm currently in No Media March,but since the family is all out,I have been given a reprieve.
No Media March is an effort to keep from letting the tv and the intertubes suck the life out of our family. It kinda does that to us. I certainly don't miss the tv,but miss you guys.
And don't tell mrs hit and run,but I've done a few posts on my blog when no one was looking. She doesn't need to know that.
Specific to the Obama-Imus point - remember Obama's speech after the Virginia Tech shootings? He referred to Imus's nappy headed ho's as "verbal violence" (and referred to Sasha and Malia to drive the point home) in a speech about an actual shooting where dozens of people were killed. He said there's all kinds of violence,like the violence of jobs being shipped overseas and the violence of kids not getting a good education. Comforting stuff for the grieving families and Tech community.
And in that speech he used his infamous quote of "brother's keeper" that he never gets right.
Anyway, I tackle some of that here: Is Obama His Brother's Keeper. Hint: now would be a really good time for Obama to ask America (regarding the Maher's of the world) "Am I my brother's keeper?" because it would align with how it was asked in Genesis.
Oh, and I hestitated to bring her up, but I fear Obama is not living up to the expectations of Christina Taylor Green he told us about in the apex of his Tucson speech.
Posted by: hit and run | March 10, 2012 at 03:31 PM
Frau
Did I mention the Independents? I might have overlooked that fact since was paying homage to our sage. Or the rise in Republicans numbers, or the enthusiasm gap that runs clearly to the Republicans as measured by the strong disapproval versus strong approval gap despite what the media tells you constantly...
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 03:36 PM
Spartans own the Badgers, again, three times in the same season.
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 03:48 PM
Very good, hit
Posted by: Clarice | March 10, 2012 at 03:49 PM
Wonderful post, hit.
Posted by: Janet | March 10, 2012 at 03:50 PM
Clarice,
I thought we had to wait until next Sunday. I'm psyched. I will take my IPAD to bed.
Hit you have a glitch in your records. You were 2 days off on Mr. Clarice. (And I took the hit- heh)
Posted by: Jane (get off the couch - come save the country) | March 10, 2012 at 03:55 PM
MEGO Arithmetic
2008 Popular Vote Total - 131,257,328
Ras Partisan ID - Nov. 2008
33.80% - R 44,364,977
41.40% - D 54,340,534
24.70% - I 32,551,817
Ras Partisan ID - Feb. 2012 [applied against 2008 turnout]
36.00% - R 47,121,381
32.40% - D 42,658,632
31.60% - I 41,477,316
Difference
R - 2,756,404
D - (11,681,902)
I - 8,925,498
Frau is correct that the VAP (Voting Age Population) has increased. It's up by about 16 million entrants less about 10 million who have exited this vale of tears. The sentiments of the new potential voters would, however, be captured by Rasmussen's polling.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | March 10, 2012 at 04:00 PM
Sandra Fluke Gets Results!
Man shot at gas station over the price of condoms.
Pelosi going to Detroit to hold hearings.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | March 10, 2012 at 04:02 PM
--So long as you LUN them, you're good to go with me Ig.--
clarice,
I was just pointing out [jokingly] that things that I can't or won't even repeat in writing, pass without comment right after I quit posting what to me are considerably less offensive things.
"I know it when I see it" seems to have an almost infinite flexibility of interpretation.
Posted by: Ignatz | March 10, 2012 at 04:03 PM
He referred to Imus's nappy headed ho's as "verbal violence" (and referred to Sasha and Malia to drive the point home) in a speech about an actual shooting where dozens of people were killed.
"Verbal violence" by making an awkward joke that drama queen C Vivian Stringer, who has never won a championship, decided to use to deflect attention away from her team's inability to beat Tennessee. In doing so she received more attention than the champions. Whatever happened to maintaining a dignified silence and letting people arrive at their own conclusions? This should've been a non-issue and it was perverse to be used in relation to the Virginia Tech shootings.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 10, 2012 at 04:08 PM
Jane:
Hit you have a glitch in your records. You were 2 days off on Mr. Clarice.
I've thought it over, and I think Clarice is wrong.
Posted by: hit and run | March 10, 2012 at 04:09 PM
I fine line to walk it would seem
To make comments and not get reamed
I learned my lesson
In a previous session
On "wake" threads don't say Mark Latrine.
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 10, 2012 at 04:15 PM
Brilliant, TM.
I'd like to submit for consideration that minus the moderation of a few shapely bottoms to quell and satiate man's infernal compulsions things have soon gotten completely out of hand and may only get worse.
And the phenomenon is not restricted to the callipygian . . . or at least a similar mammarian effect has been noted:
(Not that I'm agitating for more photos.)Posted by: Cecil Turner | March 10, 2012 at 04:16 PM
A fine line...
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 10, 2012 at 04:17 PM
Cecil, this has been eating away at me. Was my CH-53 joke not funny?
I can handle the truth.
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 10, 2012 at 04:19 PM
I'm still not sure why you don't like Levin, TK (and apology if you've explained it before). Janet finds his delivery off-putting, which I can understand; but that doesn't strike me as something that would bother you.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 10, 2012 at 04:22 PM
Captain:
This should've been a non-issue and it was perverse to be used in relation to the Virginia Tech shootings.
I completely agree. There were two moments in 2007 when Obama lost me (he never had me,but I thought him rather benign up until these two moments).
The VaTech speech was one.
And then there was his speech at AIPAC where he said, "The biggest enemy I think we have in this whole process ... it's not just terrorists, it's not just Hezbollah, it's not just Hamas -- it's also cynicism".
Interestingly enough -- here's an old blog post I wrote at AT that linked the two together.
Oh,and this was interesting the day after that was posted:
I Blame Obama.
Posted by: hit and run | March 10, 2012 at 04:28 PM
I have enjoyed Levin for years,CH. I trash him for one thing only. He used to be on a tirade about giving citizenship to anchor babies. He argued, very convincingly, that it is a matter of having sole allegiance to the United States. Being born here is not enough, you can not have any dual allegiance. Period.
When you try to make a similar argument about Obama, he resorts to insults.
When you make exactly the same argument about Rubio, he shuts down the youtube of his discussion of anchor babies.
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 10, 2012 at 04:35 PM
Well besides the fact that 18-22 year old are the least likely to register and the least likely to follow thru and vote of any cohort, the swing from + 10 D to plus 4.5 R is even more than the 11 M Zero induced runoff, he has chased a lot of Indys into the R camp.
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 04:36 PM
Thanks for linking that, hit. In addition to pointing out so many of the things that drive me up the wall about BOzo voting "present" on things after deliberating on them for an excessive amount of time; it also reminds me that there was a time when Jason Whitlock wasn't an idiot.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 10, 2012 at 04:37 PM
I've thought it over, and I think Clarice is wrong
Indeed!
Posted by: Jane (get off the couch - come save the country) | March 10, 2012 at 04:39 PM
Is it just me, or is this a strange way to write about a rescue/revival attempt for this skier who died of head injuries due to a crash during the World Cup Finals?
Staff members and medical assistants try to reanimate Canada`s Nick Zoricic who has crashed hardly after the finish jump during the skicross world cup finals, Saturday March 10, 2012 in Grindelwald, Switzerland .
I'm not sure what "crashed hardly" means either.
Posted by: Sara | March 10, 2012 at 04:41 PM
Thanks for the feedback, TK. I'm surprised that Mark would be inconsistent on that because he hasn't struck me that way on other issues (and by saying that I'm not saying that I don't believe you). And I understand your reaction.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 10, 2012 at 04:43 PM
Two real inconvenient truths, first the findings of the study and two I had to go to the British media to find out about it! Why a cynic would say its like they perceive this as being not helpful for a grievance monger campaign:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1390205/Whites-suffer-racism-blacks-Study-shows-white-people-believe-discriminated-against.html
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 04:47 PM
TK
isn't an anchor baby a baby that does not have a citizen parent? Obama's mother was a U.S. citizen. So I don't get the parallel between Obama and anchor babies.
Posted by: Chubby | March 10, 2012 at 04:50 PM
Now where would whites get those ideas? I mean with Holder doing his George Wallace impression "AA today, AA tomorrow, AA forever".
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 04:51 PM
Please read Title 8 U.S. Code Section 1401 regarding citizenship. You will note that the word "allegiance" does not appear.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | March 10, 2012 at 04:54 PM
Instapundit cuts through the fog of disinformation as he comments on the RAS poll showing both top Republicans outpolling Zero.
And yet the perception is that last week was bad for Republicans and good for the Dems because the Dems succeeded in painting the GOP as a bunch of ugly social-cons. What gives?
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 04:54 PM
I believe Rubio's parent were lawful residents, refugees from Cuba--Also not an anchor baby.An anchor baby is someone whose mom flies or swims in, gives birth and goes home or remains here illegally.
Posted by: Clarice | March 10, 2012 at 04:55 PM
Chubby
As Jim Croce told us once, you dont tug on Superman's cape, you dont spit into the wind, you pull the mask off the ol' lone ranger and you dont mess around with Jim...
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 04:56 PM
Left out a third "dont" but I think the gist is there...
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 04:57 PM
Ya know, I bet if he was being candid, Holder would say he thinks white people should be slaves to blacks -for. reparations. None of that crowd believes in equality under the law or anything else.
Posted by: Jane (get off the couch - come save the country) | March 10, 2012 at 04:59 PM
Dont look now but DOOK is losing to FSU. Oh my.
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 04:59 PM
Duh!
Posted by: Jack is Back! | March 10, 2012 at 05:01 PM
Okay, this link is just for Ignatz (all in good humor). Oh, hell, actually it is funny. These morons just don't see how utterly nutso they are.
BUST (as in bare boobs) UP BANK OF AMERICA.
Hysterical and pathetic.
Posted by: centralcal | March 10, 2012 at 05:02 PM
GMax's link is why the CRT issue is so devastating to Obama if played right; why Holder's miscreant behavior in office on race must be made more widely known.
Posted by: Clarice | March 10, 2012 at 05:03 PM
White man's greed drive a world in need. Where have we heard that before?
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 05:06 PM
Note that each of the following is a citizen;
"(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
"(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;
"(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years:..."
Posted by: Danube of Thought | March 10, 2012 at 05:06 PM
oooopsie
I was sure that in the past I had heard Obama say "tea bagger", but going back, all I could find was a video of him talking about protestors waving tea bags around ...
so I must have misremembered him saying it and my post upthread was wrong
Posted by: Chubby | March 10, 2012 at 05:08 PM
So as not to get thrown onto Alice's brand new narcisolator, I will refrain from discussing definitions we have beat to death.
Mark Levin based HIS compelling argument on allegiance. "Sole allegiance" to be exact. Rubio's parents passed on to Marco dual allegiance. Obama's daddy passed on to Bozo dual allegiance.
Mark is not consistent.
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 10, 2012 at 05:08 PM
--Okay, this link is just for Ignatz (all in good humor). Oh, hell, actually it is funny. These morons just don't see how utterly nutso they are.--
I hope you can forgive me CC but after I got a look at those first two I bailed before the video loaded.
I just ate lunch and would like to retain it.
Posted by: Ignatz | March 10, 2012 at 05:09 PM
Media Benjamin naked gets zero hits, book it.
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 05:10 PM
CH,
Left a comment for you over on the Louis C.K. thread re sciatica.
Might be useful.
Posted by: Ignatz | March 10, 2012 at 05:11 PM
Oh, Iggy it really is funny. Only one actually shows her booblets - the other two mercifully did not, so your lunch is safe.
After the clown show and they exit the bank comes the real humor. Suddenwy, we are so so afwaid of being awested and oh we whine and we snivel and we whine some more. But, arrested they were.
Posted by: centralcal | March 10, 2012 at 05:14 PM
Chubby,
Johnathon Alter quoted Barry calling the tea party tea baggers in that book he wrote a year or two ago.
Have a look.
Posted by: Ignatz | March 10, 2012 at 05:17 PM
I'll give it a try cc.
I hope my shoes reamain clean.
Posted by: Ignatz | March 10, 2012 at 05:18 PM
A question on taste for the free speech advocates here and especially those who have tut-tutted Rush's remarks about Fluke: Are those Pink Code ladies considered "slutty" for exposing themselves in public? I have known the police to charge men urinating in alley ways or along the side of a road with indcecent exposure which here in Florida puts you on sexual offender registry.
Is this another double standard? Or is it just not worth the bother since the left would never accept that anything they do can be catergorized as lewd, sexually explicit or worthy of deragatory charicterization?
Posted by: Jack is Back! | March 10, 2012 at 05:19 PM
TK (I heart you too):
refrain from discussing definitions we have beat to death.
Leave No Dead Horse Unflogged is the unoffical motto of JOM per Dear Leader.
Posted by: hit and run | March 10, 2012 at 05:20 PM
GMAX, I don't mind looking, it's the listening to Dickie V that could be worse than a loss.
FSU is a good team. Duke is a mystery.
Posted by: MarkO | March 10, 2012 at 05:22 PM
OK that was pretty funny cc.
At times it's hard to believe women like that and the lovely ladies here or that we're married to are of the same species.
BTW don't know if you saw but the very first comment was "hope it wasn't right after lunch". :)
Posted by: Ignatz | March 10, 2012 at 05:23 PM
Thank you Gmax and RB . You have made my day!
Posted by: maryrose | March 10, 2012 at 05:23 PM
Whadda ya think, is John from Powerline right in pointing out that the law of unintended consequences biting zero in the tush? Here:
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 05:31 PM
Plumlee fouls out and FSU goes up 3 with 1 minute left...
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 05:32 PM
FSU up 3 with only 11 seconds. DOOK got the ball though...
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 05:35 PM
What does Levin say about 8 US Code Section 1401? Why did the congress make no mention of allegiance in enacting it?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | March 10, 2012 at 05:36 PM
Ignatz, thanks for that link.
Posted by: Chubby | March 10, 2012 at 05:39 PM
FSU to inbound up 3 with 3.5 seconds left. Somehow I dont think UNC is going to struggle like this in the final...
OVER.
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 05:39 PM
Ok hit, because you asked.
http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec8.html
If congress was only given the power to create "rule of Naturalization", persons made citizens under the USC are, at best, naturalized citizens of the United States.
That makes sense.
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 10, 2012 at 05:41 PM
GMax:
Whadda ya think, is John from Powerline right in pointing out that the law of unintended consequences biting zero in the tush?
Yup. From your quote:
Obama is Cain. He's asking the nation, "Am I my (liberal) brothers' keeper?" after he killed civility over the past three plus years.
Posted by: hit and run | March 10, 2012 at 05:42 PM
Why is it, that it always seem to be that the guy who accused the policeman of acting stupidly, is in fact the one acting stupidly?
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 05:44 PM
There aren't enough miracles for Duke this year. They seem to need one every game.
Posted by: MarkO | March 10, 2012 at 05:45 PM
Hit I thought you gave up the internet for lent or something?
Posted by: Gmax | March 10, 2012 at 05:46 PM
--Why is it, that it always seem to be that the guy who accused the policeman of acting stupidly, is in fact the one acting stupidly?--
A man on a horse told me it might be because Barry's not that smart and he's a lair.
Posted by: Ignatz | March 10, 2012 at 05:48 PM
Gmax:
Hit I thought you gave up the internet for lent or something?
My 3:31 explains the current reprieve.
Posted by: hit and run | March 10, 2012 at 06:09 PM
Joh's right--Now to check Iggy's post.
Posted by: Clarice | March 10, 2012 at 06:12 PM
Media Benjamin naked gets zero hit
Medea Benjamin naked would be like looking at Medusa only causing permanent ED.
Iggy, I saw what you posted; I can't remember if I had one or not a year and a half ago. Maybe I'll ask my doctor; even though I'm in Kaiser you get to choose your own doctor (unfortunately the ones I've had have all gone on to greener pastures although they get replaced by other good ones).
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 10, 2012 at 06:16 PM
Hard to call them naturalized when Section 1401 says "The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth." if the congress wanted to declare the naturalized citizens, it knew how to do so, and elsewhere has legislated extensively on naturalization.
And as we know from as far back as Calvin's case (1608), a citizen at birth is a natural born citizen.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | March 10, 2012 at 06:20 PM
So as not to get thrown onto Alice's brand new narcisolator
TK, I can't see that you are at any risk. I promise I'll only use my new power for good.
Posted by: AliceH | March 10, 2012 at 06:25 PM
Those who on occasion complain about TK going on should take note of DoT poking the beehive with a stick ...
Posted by: boris | March 10, 2012 at 06:26 PM
Professor Obamas' required reading at the University of Chicago Law School
Open up your hearts and your minds to the words of Professor Derrick Bell.
Current Issues of Racism and the Law
Posted by: Rocco | March 10, 2012 at 06:26 PM
Congress cannot declare them anything more than naturalized. Your quote is still true, as an act of naturalization, so they need not say more.
If saying more is better, though, congress should have gone the extra step to declare 14th amendment citizens as "natural born citizens". They "knew how to do so", so their omission must have been purposeful.
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 10, 2012 at 06:36 PM
OK, I'm trying desperately not to do anything productive today and this thread seems to be all over the place so (I'm assuming these pics aren't offensive) I ask for opinions on which one of these three very different brunettes is better looking. Two pics of each one.
No figuring age, body, airheadedness or politics into the equation.
Posted by: Ignatz | March 10, 2012 at 06:38 PM
Rocco's 6:26
He calls himself a Prof. on the fist page but just Barack Obama after. Was he ever a Professor (which I take to be an earned honor and position)?
I notice he has a number of conservative positions represented including Bork. The gun may not be smoking as much as we would hope.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | March 10, 2012 at 06:41 PM
Door #3.
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 10, 2012 at 06:42 PM
Sophia Loren gets my vote.The lat one is also very beautiful and reminds me of your lovely wife.
Posted by: Clarice | March 10, 2012 at 06:43 PM