Powered by TypePad

« I'm Not Even Asking About The Testing Or Quality Control | Main | With Wishes Of 'Good Luck' from Paul Krugman... »

March 09, 2012

Comments

Porchlight

At various times, slavery, Soviet Communism, and a Democratic House were facts that any Republican had to live with.

Zing.

Eyes on the prize. It's not about CRT or Derrick Bell. It's about confronting the MSM and exposing their pro-Obama agenda, in 2008 and today.

Soledad was the first specimen pinned.

As Breitbart said, he wasn't out to slay the dragon, but to force the dragon to be more reasonable, if only in its own self-interest.

btomdarga

SLUTS!!!


SLUTS!!!!

They are ALL SLUTS!!!!!!!

btomdarga

"Critical race theory is grievance mongering and race baiting all rolled up in one package. And nothing Soledad OBrien or any other prog tool says, is going to convince me otherwise."
I agree. we don’t NEED to know anything about Critical Race Theory to hate it.

Is it Critical? It's Anti-American!
Is it about Race? It's Anti-American!
Is it an academic "theory"? It's Anti-American!!!


Go back to College with the rest of the SLUTS Soledad!!

centralcal

Exactly, Porchlight. Those who think this is about Obama, are missing the point altogether.

I see on Twitter some hateful liberal is using Breitbart's widow Susie as their Twitter name and posting crap.

Nothing is more vile and ugly than a liberal. Nothing.

Ignatz

--I agree. we don’t NEED to know anything about Critical Race Theory to hate it.--

Excellent snark, dude.
However it might have been even more effective if the idiot you are defending wasn't the one who had no idea what critical race theory embodies.

bgates

It's because we do know what CRT is that we hate it, and we won't be convinced otherwise by lies from CNN any more than we will be by leftist buffoons here in the comments section.

RichatUF

centralcal-

So you are letting me know that I need another cup of coffee?

Janet

Rocco, That Tim Wise fellow that is mentioned in your 11:29 post is a nut. He is a white guy that literally hates whites. He travels to universities & gives talks about how lousy white people are. He's got a BIG problem.

Clarice

Did Obama do his studying exclusively with folks like Ogletree and Bell? You know I don't believe he passed regular courses and was allowed to get thru on "independent studies"..Maybe cause he still was passing himself off as a foreign student..

Jim Rhoads a/k/a vnjagvet

And neither the new troll nor Soledad NEED to know anything about Critical Race Theory to love it.

centralcal

Sorry Rich - I just tuned in late from work and haven't read every comment here (phones ringing, clients arriving), so I don't understand your coffee question :)

bgates

I don't see how the Republican candidate can win this year, though. Obama won in Florida, Arizona, North Carolina, Virginia, Ohio, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, and Democratic dominance in those states is a fact we have to live with. How can you change a fact? It's a permanent, immutable feature of the universe. That's why they call it a fact.

rse

Back from getting that missing Professionalism hour where I had to listen to someone who was already very annoying in law school.

On Invisible Children. Red brought that up this week and asked me to look into it. Which she never does. She was upset because the new principal is really pushing it along with getting seniors registered to vote. He is, quite literally, a moron brought in to make the high school a template for taking down high achieving schools. If he is pushing IC, someone regards it as a political vehicle. He is useful to me because he so carries through on other's plans.

Let's remember Stanley Fish moved from pushing critical theory more in undergrad humanities a la Duke English in the late 70s to being a law prof now at Yale. I think CRT has gone somewhat stealth now as it is located in the mainstream history and English approaches used without a big label calling attention to the nature of the theory.

My plans are to write about higher ed next. I have all the research. Basically CRT was a radical view that fought for recognition alongside more mainstream views then it took out the mainstream approaches but with still familiar sounding course names. Now it is the transmission of knowledge itself that is being targeted. This gets hidden in titles most may not notice like changing history to historical thought and English to Rhetoric/Literary Studies and Religion to Religious perspectives. CRT will be missing that title but it gets incorporated in a belief that there is no such thing as absolute or universal truths. All is relative.

Then all is power.

Rick Ballard

bgates,

The most important thing to not remember is 20??. The elections which did not happen in 20?? cannot have any bearing on the political situation today because of their non-existence.

RichatUF

If it even worse now that I have to explain my joke:

Those who think this is about Obama, are missing the point altogether.

My comments above were mostly about Obama. I just woke up.

I was trying to be too clever by half.

btomdarga

"Excellent snark, dude."

Whatever you f-ing liberal plant.

Go back to college with the rest of the sluts!

btomdarga

I'm more conservative that you could be even if you could replace those raisins between your legs that you're wife laughs at while I'm screwing her properly

Thomas Collins

Oh no! One of our peaceloving "alternative" posters may be going to war against Iran. Say it ain't so! See LUN.

Janet

Here - An open letter to the white right by Tim Wise.
A nut case! Remember he gets paid to speak at universities...:(

Clarice

Looks like it's time for cleo to restock his prescriptions.

jimmyk

Those who think this is about Obama, are missing the point altogether.

I realize that the primary target is the media, but since the subject of Obama was raised....

But even if the direct target is the MSM, the idea still seems to be to affect this election, by shining a light on MSM malfeasance. It's important to do this, but it will be a Thirty Years War. I don't believe anything will change in the next seven months, especially without more of a smoking gun than this.

Janet

Saw this at the link too - Tim Wise Speech in Austin, TX. 2/24/11 at St. James Episcopal Church.

centralcal

It's important to do this, but it will be a Thirty Years War.

Yes, it will be jimmyk and we have to start somewhere. Obama is part of the equation in that the media sycophants try to shield his ugliness from view. Every little glimpse of that ugliness is a good thing (cumulatively)- both his and theirs.

timc

I guess this tells us what Holder thinks about all of this, he believes in Derrick Bell.

Ignatz

--I'm more conservative that you could be even if you could replace those raisins between your legs that you're wife laughs at while I'm screwing her properly--

"You're wife?"
Confusing.
Does that mean you're (excuse me, 'your') gay or a lesbian?

Sardonicone

Just about anybody knows Derek Bell is a race car driver. I don't think he even went to college.

btomdarga

No Ignatz, I'm not a gay liberal like you. I made a typo.


BTW, The next bombshell will be the tape of Obama as one of the 100 black guys who regularly gangbanged your mom. Tape is on the internet. I even rubbed one off to it myself. She's an ugly whore but OH SO NASTY!!!!

btomdarga

Think you know who your father is?

No, you don't.

Ignatz

--I even rubbed one off to it myself.--

Are you sure you have this insult thing down quite yet?

mad jack

The troll is clearly mentally ill so please stop responding to him.

Threadkiller

This is the best Hot Air can bring to the thread?

Soledad's Mustache

{}

glenda

The fabulous TM hits it out of the park. Again.

This CRT is what is ingrained in Obama and his Fundamental change of America. Soledad is just the current example of the media enablers greedy to retain their power to message to the sheep.

My test? If someone in politics or media supports Obama and his policies/beliefs; they are self-serving lying cowards.

Danube of Thought

Just by way of background, I was at that law school about 15 years ahead of Obama. I don;t remember hearing a word about CRT. However, there was an increasing level of discussion about Critical Legal Studies, which was just a more generalized version of the same thing: despite all the glorious language, the law was ultimately just a tool of oppression to maintain the status quo and keep the elites at the top. The intelletual leader of this school was a young twit named Duncan Kennedy, from whom I never took a class.

The law faculty at that time featured one Republican--one. That was the late Phil Areeda, the antitrust guru who taught me both contracts and antitrust law. Fine, fine man.

I will say this for Alan Dershowitz: on the first day of class he said "I am a liberal. I am not going to try to make you liberals if you are not. What I hope to do is make you a better liberal or a better conservative, whatever your views may be." I think he tried to, and did, live up to that.

Danube of Thought

Raz: "In a hypothetical 2012 matchup, Mitt Romney now leads President Obama 47% to 45%."

Ignatz

--The troll is clearly mentally ill so please stop responding to him.--

No, he's clearly a jerk and a fool.
Nonetheless, never let it be said I disobeyed a lawful order, even one that says please.

MarkO

But, at bottom, aren't all of these movements, from speech codes to CRT, to Occupy about the loss of freedom to someone else's advantage? We don't even have societal freedom to call each other names.

Meanwhile, those who are imposing these limits gain power with every new regulation or politically correct victory.

Gus

Soledad O'Brien buys what Derrick Bell sold. So instead of supporting his theory, she just pretends his theory is MAINSTREAM ACADEMIA.

It is not. It is typical racial nonsense.

That is all.

Jack is Back!

DoT,

I am having a hard time swallowing French's theory on Obama (law student vs. POTUS). I agree in some ways your activist years really don't always translate fully to your management or political years but in his case they have. The difference between his HLS activism and his role as POTUS is that at Harvard he did not have a Congress and a voting publc to neutralize or moderate his activism.

Does French actually believe that Barack Obama only said he wanted to close Gitmo to get the left's vote? His problem was he couldn't find a way to close Gitmo and have the Congress and public and more importantly his Generals and CIA buy into it. Regarding Iran, he said he would talk to "his enemies" while running against Hillary and he lived up to that remark in spades. He got ObamaCare the way it was because that is all he could ring out of the blue dog Dems. If he could have he would have gone full monty for Universal Single Payer ala Canada, the UK and Europe.

The next tape will require another tilted mirror of opinion from the right since it going to show him meeting with Malik Shabbazz, the New Black Panther guy standing at the door of the Philadelphia precinct with a billy club in his hands. Obama's DoJ dismissed that case in a large part by the appreciation of CRT among the Voting Rights Section staff and management.

The only thing keeping him from full implementation of his Frank Marshall Davis, Derrick Bell, Jeremy Wright, Bill Ayers, and Company version of socio-political transformation is Congress and the Public. They are not ready for it (and hopefully never) as 2010 has indicated. More shoes will drop between now and November.

Porchlight

So instead of supporting his theory, she just pretends his theory is MAINSTREAM ACADEMIA.

It is not. It is typical racial nonsense.

Sadly, it is both.

That racialist nonsense has become mainstream in academia is something the Soledads of the world can now use to their advantage. "See, it's mainstream! He was a Harvard professor!"

This was the Gramscian goal all along.

MarkO

At this point, I have a hard time giving Obama the benefit of any doubt.

RichatUF

Gus-

It is mainstream (or maintrickle) academia. What do you think is taught in humanities departments in colleges and universities all across the US (and elsewhere)?

mad jack

Ig: I think we are both right. Thanks

MightyWeeMan

If you want to get to why we're where we are on this issue, don't miss yet another of Bill Whittle's excellent summaries..on the battle of big ideologies


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dwz_Z62e0s&feature=uploademail

Cecil Turner

If the point of the exercise was to demonstrate CRT is a grievance cult, it's pretty well successful. If it's to demonstrate Soledad O'Brien is fully in the tank for team Obama, it's belaboring the obvious. If it's to enlighten the electorate on the checkered past of Barry O, it's a dud.

As unpersuasive as CRT may be, it's a heckuva lot more mainstream than Black Liberation Theology, and that's where the Obamas went to church. For years. Introducing a law professor at law school is simply not in the same league, and the video does very little other than reinforcing the fact that he hasn't really renounced the views of Reverend Wright. But that's not news; and it's not going to stay in the headlines long enough to do anyone any good.

The only way this campaign would work is if the lefty commentariat would take it up as an example of the evil righwing media lying about their poor candidate . . . a la the "Swiftvet Liars" effort. But even Soledad isn't stupid enough to keep putting her nose in that grinder. Is she?

NK

DoT-- if you had Areeda and Dershowitz, you actually got your money's worth at HLS.

PS: shot in the dark- were you acquainted with student Roger Schecter or Bill Robbins?

jimmyk

I think he tried to, and did, live up to that.

I don't doubt it, but it does seem a bit odd as a way to frame his objective. These are kids in their early 20s. My goal wouldn't be to help them further solidify their preconceived ideas, but to rethink them (never mind just to, you know, learn the law). I say this as one who entered college a leftist and came out a Reaganite.

Porchlight

It's just the first video, Cecil. Much more to come. And there are many more Soledads out there.

Gus

Racism in not ended by the digruntled creating their own form of racism to fix racism.

If Derrick Bell was mainstream, why was this video hidden.
He clearly wasn't Mainstream back then.

Libtards like Soletrain O'Brien equate pity with equality.

Cecil Turner

Much more to come.

If it's no more illuminating than this, we'd be far better off demonstrating how redistributionist policies killed the stimulus (and continue to hamper the recovery) rather than psychoanalyzing why Obama is a true believer in such policies.

RichatUF

rse is writing a book about it!!!

Captain Hate

I see on Twitter some hateful liberal is using Breitbart's widow Susie as their Twitter name and posting crap.

Nothing is more vile and ugly than a liberal. Nothing.

Ugh. They always opt for the personal attack because they're unable to imagine politics as anything but all about them.

Clarice

Cecil, do not assume what you know about Obama is widely known A large number of urban voters only got the post racial clean genius the NYT, WaPo, LAT and alphabets were pimping..and still don't get it.

Porchlight

If it's no more illuminating than this

I guess I am not getting through.

Of course it's not illuminating to us. We are not the target audience.

Captain Hate

we'd be far better off demonstrating how redistributionist policies killed the stimulus (and continue to hamper the recovery) rather than psychoanalyzing why Obama is a true believer in such policies.

I disagree; that's the job of the candidate to do and that's why I voted for Newt on Tuesday. We unfortunately have an electorate that's been deprived of a decent tutorial on how the economy works and I think Newt is the only candidate that seems to both realize it and be willing to fill in the blanks and connect the dots. I haven't seen any evidence that Romney understands this. I think that he'd be an ok candidate if the level of education was where it should be.

Ignatz

--Of course it's not illuminating to us. We are not the target audience.--

Is the target audience capable of, or even desirous of, illumination?
There is none so blind and so on.

Porchlight

Is the target audience capable of, or even desirous of, illumination?

If they're not, why would we bother to lecture them on the redistributionist nature of the stimulus?

It would be useless either way.

RichatUF

I think that he'd be an ok candidate if the level of education was where it should be.

Imagine if we only had a Harvard graduate with a truck load of money and years of Wall Street experience to instruct us about the economy.

Danube of Thought

NK, I don't recall either of those names, but it's been a long time.

I thunk Dershowitz meant that he hoped to instill in us a value-neutral method of analysis and critical thinking that each of us could put to his own purposes.

CH, I'm watching the Terps on about a one-hour delay, but it don't look good early. I think the top three seeds at the Dance should be Ky., Heels and Cuse. Not sure about no. 4.

Cecil Turner

Cecil, do not assume what you know about Obama is widely known. [. . .]

We are not the target audience.

It's not relatively unknown because the information is hard to access; those who don't believe Obama is a [reverse?] racist are willfully blind. Which is even harder to correct than ignorance. This sort of thing isn't going to do it.

However, the average guy is watching the economy with something between trepidation and downright horror. There's your low-hanging fruit. (And you can bet people like Chuck Schumer and David Axelrod are going to be crafting a very cunning ad campaign trying to blame it on Wall Street fatcats sucking up more than their fair share of the pie.) This is at best a sideshow.

Porchlight

This is at best a sideshow.

I don't know that anyone has claimed that this should be the entire thrust of the GOP campaign from now until November.

One war, many fronts, many weapons, many soldiers.

Porchlight

Clip of Brian Lamb (I think) interviewing Thomas Sowell in 1990 about Derrick Bell. Sowell mentions being encouraged that Dershowitz stood up to this nonsense. He also talked about a black law professor named Randall Kennedy that Bell's allies tried to destroy because he didn't toe the line.

http://www.therightscoop.com/1990-thomas-sowell-explains-derrick-bell/

Cecil Turner

If they're not, why would we bother to lecture them on the redistributionist nature of the stimulus?

Obama openly admits he's redistributionist. We could use a few bumper stickers with "I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."

[Okay, might have to edit that one a bit.]

Captain Hate

(And you can bet people like Chuck Schumer and David Axelrod are going to be crafting a very cunning ad campaign trying to blame it on Wall Street fatcats sucking up more than their fair share of the pie.)

They tried that in 2010 and it was a disaster. That only works when your candidate is an unknown quantity. Voters just have to be reminded how well off they are compared to 2008. Kucinich losing by a huge margin should be a fair warning to the commiecrats that 2010 was just a preview.

Ignatz

--If they're not, why would we bother to lecture them on the redistributionist nature of the stimulus?--

Who's we?
I think such a lecture is largely pointless.
A campaign theme of "what have I done for lately? just look at my goody bag" would prove a lot more effective.
The vast muddle doesn't like tax cuts because they're dead set against redistribution of wealth; they like that just fine.
They like tax cuts because they perceive it makes the redistribution cheaper for them.

Rick Ballard

Cecil,

It's reinforcement for the Muddle. The actual shift occurred when BOzo led the Dems beyond the precipice with Obamacare. That, coupled with his demonstrated basic incompetence across the board is what will take him out. The Muddle is living his economic failure and there is nothing that can be written which will loosen the clenched jaws of Mr. & Mrs. Muddle as they drive past gas stations on their way to see how far they can stretch their SNAP card this month.

I don't see a bit of "What the hell did you expect from a damned commie?" being particularly distracting.

Porchlight

Obama openly admits he's redistributionist. We could use a few bumper stickers with "I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."

Didn't work in 2008 when Joe the Plumber came on the scene. Won't work this year. Obama's voters like being on the good end of redistribution. They don't know and don't want to know.

(See how easy it is to paint someone else's ideas as a sideshow not worth the bother?)

Actually I think it's a great idea. All of the above is my motto.

Cecil Turner

(See how easy it is to paint someone else's ideas as a sideshow not worth the bother?)

No. It, like the HLS video, was unpersuasive. (I'm happy to see you didn't mean it.)

Cecil Turner

The actual shift occurred when BOzo led the Dems beyond the precipice with Obamacare.

Polling suggests the shift is less persistent than I'd hoped.

Jane

Actually the way to get them is have everyone on our side stop working and go on welfare.

Sue

Actually the way to get them is have everyone on our side stop working and go on welfare.

Hot diggity damn. I'm in, Jane.

My sister and I have a saying "them sonbitches are crazy". We then ask the obvious question...if they are crazy, why are we working and they aren't?

btomdarga

Peace out Liberals!!

I've got better things to do that waste my time with phony liberals who study CRT and then pretend to be so-called conservatives.

Porchlight

No. It, like the HLS video, was unpersuasive.

Ok, Cecil, you win for now.

If further installments in the Breitbart video series turn out to have more of an impact, I hope you'll at least admit that it was explained to you multiple times that Breitbart's method is to lead with his weakest stuff and then build up.

jimmyk

Imagine if we only had a Harvard graduate with a truck load of money and years of Wall Street experience to instruct us about the economy.

Unfortunately, success in business is largely uncorrelated with understanding "the economy," and going to Harvard is probably counterproductive on that point. (I realize your comment was tongue-in-cheek.)

AliceH

the average guy is watching the economy with something between trepidation and downright horror.

I really hate the "average guy" argument. If you are facing a wall and there is one door on your right, one on your left, on AVERAGE you would go straight to exit the room.

Your average guy may find the economy the most compelling. My average guy has been living in a crappy local economy for about 30 years now -- it truly is not noticeably worse 3 years in. What IS resonating with my "average guys" is the assault on Religious Freedom (by way of the mandate), and the growing evidence of selective media coverups during 2008. Really.

There is a reason Geico has 4 or 5 different advertising campaigns underway at a time -- no one gimmick (caveman, lizard, pig, etc) will get every viewer's attention.

Rick Ballard

Cecil,

What polling are you looking at? Ras Partisan ID Trends had it at 32.9R vs 36.2D in March '10. It moved to 36%R, 33.7D by November '10. Today it's 36%R 32.4D. Congressional preference bounces around a bit more but the GOP remains on top and BOzo was at 50.3% Approval in February '10 versus 45.7% for February '12, average for the month per Gallup daily data.

Clarice

Cecil, there are a bunch of audiences out there--a lot of folks who were sold on the postracial black best friend story and those now suffering from the effects of his economic ignorance. These two groups are not necessarily co-extensive.
Were I a candidate, I'd do as you say and hit the economics issue. But that's no reason to work on picking off some other groups--

As for Jane's strike idea--it's already taking place in the refusal to make capital improvements or make new hires. But I wouldn't be opposed to a productive Americans Take Back the Reins Day, where people doing productive work and paying taxes all sit home for a day and cut the tax revenues in so doing.

AliceH

Wait - I swear I did not use any tags - untagging NOW.

Extraneus

Be gone.

Janet

Love the Bill Whittle video. This video was always one of my favorites - American Government: Republic not Democracy

Gus

I think the PENNSYLVANIA POST RACIAL speech should be used in the UPCOMING GOP campaign.

Wright AND Bell were anything but Post Racial.

rse

jimmy-you know harvard undergrad profs can no longer give final exams without petitioning for permission? Word from current students is hard to get in but not difficult after that. Same from duke. I know why but few get the value added they are paying for.

I tried to explain the other night to my son's close friend who is a Pres Scholar at Tech that businesses do not behave like the math models as he is being led to believe. Tremendous damage has been caused by mathematizing economics. By the way if you have not read Deirdre McCloskey's Bourgeois Dignity it is excellent.

On CRT, critical theorists in higher ed elsewhere in the world marvelled at how open the American professorate was in its open advocacy. We tend to not understand Marxism very well here and if it lacks the M label and doesn't eliminate private property, no one seems to recognize when the theory functions the same. One radical whose work has remained basically classified because he was so graphic talked about how excellent he finds books that teach Marxist thought without ever using the word.

We have talked before about the importance of the accreditors in spreading this poison. I have a copy of their presentation on how to use Accreditation to promote diversity. Because that was the push the particular standards for the time period of that assault were graphic on what would be required. The next set of standards a few years later were less graphic so if you did not track standards as a progression you wouldn't find the measures that were required or how those are still in place now but through an innocuous sounding term.

Captain Hate

O/T For whatever reason (laziness?) I get emails from the New Republic. I probably should tell them to delete me from their list but I haven't. They just upped the ante by having an Alan Grayson verbal chunk vomited on it (while claiming that they don't sell their email addresses which makes me wonder WTF). I'd copy and paste it for you except this thread has already had one troll's ignorance on it and why double down. But just imagine the most brainless, smarmy, self-serving garbage possible and then square it.

Threadkiller

A photo essay featuring the 1st birther. (and it's not Orly or Leo
?)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/70316987/Meet-Poppa-Birther-Professor-Jonathan-Turley-FOMB

ME

Critical Race Theory fits in neatly with much of what passes for radical leftist thought these days: We're right and you'll never understand why, because you're different. So, I don't have to explain myself to you.

Of course, as O'Brien demonstrates, this kind of perspective obviously conveniences those who *can't* explain why they're *right.*

Soledad's Mustache

This thread just got instalanched.

Jane

Has there been any response from Soledad?

jimmyk

Tremendous damage has been caused by mathematizing economics.

Yes and no. Math is like guns: Very useful important, but dangerous in the wrong hands. And yet, if guns aren't available, ill-intentioned people will find other weapons. So I don't blame the math, though it has aided and abetted some abuses.

By the way if you have not read Deirdre McCloskey's Bourgeois Dignity it is excellent.

Nope--I've only read McCloskey's stuff on rhetoric. I'll check it out.

Captain Hate

Tammy Bruce just mentioned she met the Ewok @ Breitbart's funeral.

jimmyk

oops.

glenda

Porchlight... I believe you are spot on. There is a lot more coming and axelrat has sent the troops out to stir up anything(Fluke) to deflect Obama's vetting. But, we are going to "Breitbart" 'em!

Amy

This doesn't prove any points for Pollak. He is the only one who used the term "white supremacy". That term implies a specific group of people, not just the concept that one race (in this case white) oppresses another.

The righties are so excited about Soledad, you would think there was something of substance there.

http://civiltongue.com/2012/03/09/bell-of-liberty/

Captain Hate

This thread just got instalanched

Apology if I've asked this before but what does that mean?

centralcal

It means Glenn Reynolds - Instapundit has linked to this post.

centralcal

The righties are so excited about Soledad, you would think there was something of substance there.

No, you are wrong. There is nothing of substance with Soledad O'Brien.

jimmyk

Amy, I wish you'd put carp like "Social conservatives are uncomfortable with black men questioning authority or having a position of power" higher up in your blog post (which had some reasonable points), so I wouldn't have wasted two minutes of my life reading the rest of it. By playing the "racist" card you've disqualified yourself from further consideration.

Janet

Someone at Instapundit just reminded me about what the MFM did to Carrie Prejean. Axelrod calls her a dog.

Well, at least he didn't call her a slut....

Gus

Dog is not uncivil
Slut is.

Right?

Melinda Romanoff

O/T Harry Wendelstedt has passed away.

Dave (in MA)
It means Glenn Reynolds - Instapundit has linked to this post.
And to expect a possible avalanche of comments from newcomers as a result. It's not an "Instalaunch" as some folks sometimes say.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Wilson/Plame