Jiminy - Reuters has a long profile of George Zimmerman and we learn in the lead that he got his gun permit and gun because a neighbor wouldn't control his large, menacing pit bull:
(Reuters) - A pit bull named Big Boi began menacing George and Shellie Zimmerman in the fall of 2009.
The first time the dog ran free and cornered Shellie in their gated community in Sanford, Florida, George called the owner to complain. The second time, Big Boi frightened his mother-in-law's dog. Zimmerman called Seminole County Animal Services and bought pepper spray. The third time he saw the dog on the loose, he called again. An officer came to the house, county records show.
"Don't use pepper spray," he told the Zimmermans, according to a friend. "It'll take two or three seconds to take effect, but a quarter second for the dog to jump you," he said.
"Get a gun."
That November, the Zimmermans completed firearms training at a local lodge and received concealed-weapons gun permits. In early December, another source close to them told Reuters, the couple bought a pair of guns. George picked a Kel-Tec PF-9 9mm handgun, a popular, lightweight weapon.
Oh, man - if only the First Dog Diner had been around in September 2009. We can hear him now - "If I had a dog it would look like Big Boi and Big Boi would look like dinner."
The real juice in the story is a bit later, where Reuters describes the crime wave that had vexed the Retreat at Twin Lakes. Two snippets:
Though civil rights demonstrators have argued Zimmerman should not have prejudged Martin, one black neighbor of the Zimmermans said recent history should be taken into account.
"Let's talk about the elephant in the room. I'm black, OK?" the woman said, declining to be identified because she anticipated backlash due to her race. She leaned in to look a reporter directly in the eyes. "There were black boys robbing houses in this neighborhood," she said. "That's why George was suspicious of Trayvon Martin."
And one of the burglaries was unusually upsetting:
At least eight burglaries were reported within Twin Lakes in the 14 months prior to the Trayvon Martin shooting, according to the Sanford Police Department. Yet in a series of interviews, Twin Lakes residents said dozens of reports of attempted break-ins and would-be burglars casing homes had created an atmosphere of growing fear in the neighborhood.
...
But it was the August incursion into the home of Olivia Bertalan that really troubled the neighborhood, particularly Zimmerman. Shellie was home most days, taking online courses towards certification as a registered nurse.
On August 3, Bertalan was at home with her infant son while her husband, Michael, was at work. She watched from a downstairs window, she said, as two black men repeatedly rang her doorbell and then entered through a sliding door at the back of the house. She ran upstairs, locked herself inside the boy's bedroom, and called a police dispatcher, whispering frantically.
"I said, 'What am I supposed to do? I hear them coming up the stairs!'" she told Reuters. Bertalan tried to coo her crying child into silence and armed herself with a pair of rusty scissors.
Police arrived just as the burglars - who had been trying to disconnect the couple's television - fled out a back door. Shellie Zimmerman saw a black male teen running through her backyard and reported it to police.
After police left Bertalan, George Zimmerman arrived at the front door in a shirt and tie, she said. He gave her his contact numbers on an index card and invited her to visit his wife if she ever felt unsafe. He returned later and gave her a stronger lock to bolster the sliding door that had been forced open.
"He was so mellow and calm, very helpful and very, very sweet," she said last week. "We didn't really know George at first, but after the break-in we talked to him on a daily basis. People were freaked out. It wasn't just George calling police ... we were calling police at least once a week."
I guess he didn't come off as an annoying contol freak at that moment.
This is the second recent 'new perspective' story from Reuters. Obviously, this might have been more helpful in easing our national blood pressure had it been run last March, but hey.
I will add that I read about the home invasion back when the City of Sanford had more of their police reports online. The prosecutor asked to have them taken down; they live online, but where? In the Google Cache, of course, and now also here: TwinLakesBurglaryReports; the home invasion is p. 13.
The Tampa Bay Times wrote about a neighborhood in transition battered by falling home prices and crime back on March 25. I do not think the Tampa Bay Times crime stat jibes with the Reuters numbers, but here we go:
For the first two months of this year, at the Retreat at Twin Lakes, the Sanford police logged 51 calls for service. Half were just people requesting information. The others included eight burglaries, two bike thefts and three simple assaults.
UPDATE: Here is the Miami Herald from March 17, with help from DizzyMissL:
The answer may lie in police records, which show that 50 suspicious-person reports were called in to police in the past year at Twin Lakes. There were eight burglaries, nine thefts and one other shooting in the year prior to Trayvon’s death.
In all, police had been called to the 260-unit complex 402 times from Jan. 1, 2011 to Feb. 26, 2012.
The more I learn about George, the more I realise that Team Skittles, Sharpton and Jackson couldn't have chosen a worse person to accuse of racism.
And so much for that 'George carried a gun because he couldn't be a real cop' meme. That one has died an ugly death.
Posted by: Caspar Weinburger | April 25, 2012 at 06:17 PM
There had been another shooting in the same gated community. We don't hear much about that one, and I don't know when or what that was about.
But yeah, mostly about burglaries and even a hot breakin. They always get away. Racist.
Posted by: cboldt | April 25, 2012 at 06:19 PM
I hope the nation gets a huge lesson about narratives.
==========
Posted by: A thousand and one tales. | April 25, 2012 at 06:19 PM
Wait 'til the press throws Corey under the bus. That'll be a sight to behold.
Posted by: cboldt | April 25, 2012 at 06:25 PM
More horrible news for the buubmeister.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | April 25, 2012 at 06:25 PM
My daughter called from Orlando alittle while ago to report that last night she was out with some friends, one of whom lives in Sanford. She wanted to tell me that this guy is really ticked off at how his community is being portrayed by the race baiters. She said he is organizing Sanford residents to be on call if the Sharpton/Jackson mob tries to start anything again as a result of any aspect of the GZ case. Her report: "He is pissed royally."
Posted by: Sara | April 25, 2012 at 06:30 PM
You're being too rational. To some, it will be all too obvious the Koch brothers have gotten to Reuters.
Posted by: AliceH | April 25, 2012 at 06:31 PM
Somebody should inform Al and Jesse that George Zimmerman is as black as Homer Plessy was (h/tip MarkO).
Posted by: Danube of Thought | April 25, 2012 at 06:33 PM
AliceH: Heh!
If Al & Jesse held a press conference to declare that 2+2=4, it would undermine 10,000 years worth of math theory.
Posted by: iqvoice | April 25, 2012 at 06:39 PM
New meme--racist dog hater.
Posted by: boatbuilder | April 25, 2012 at 06:44 PM
The media walk back has begun. No Pulitzer for the misreporting and Crump stenography but there might be one for the clean up. What a mess. I still think the walk back is CYA ordered by the corporate media legal staff to hedge against libel suits.
Posted by: Bob | April 25, 2012 at 06:44 PM
I still think the walk back is CYA ordered by the corporate media legal staff to hedge against libel suits.
Maybe -- but this is SOP for the press. Push the lies loudly, then whisper the corrections.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 25, 2012 at 06:47 PM
If that neighbor is put on the stand and so testifies, or if the police testify that there had been African American teenagers identified as burglars in the neighborhood, the case is toast, as is the DA.
Posted by: matt | April 25, 2012 at 06:49 PM
As I noted when this all started, I have an investment condo that is in a similar community that is mostly rented by absentee landlords or other type of owners. It is a great gated townhouse, condo community on the ICW. But it is also struggling with maintenance costs. So, it has eliminated the security person at the front gate to clear non-residents in. Now all you need is either a transonder or gate code for the key punch. Lots of drug activity, police call outs, burgalries and trespassing. But they don't have a neighborhood watch program but rely on the Sheriff to show up and stop the crime.
Talking to my renter, he has gone through CWP training as has several more of his neighbors. More and more people there are armed. Probably a good thing. Sooner or later the realization of personal security hits you square in the jaw and you do what you have to do.
"Jorge" is only one example of getting the message. Trayvon never got the message or chose to ignore it being the NO-LIMIT-NIGGA playing the Knockout Game while suspended for ..... stealing, burgalry and a cold kocking a school bus drive much to the applause and gratitutd of his twitter feed.
When do we get the sob story of St. Trayvon?
Posted by: Jack is Back! | April 25, 2012 at 06:56 PM
"You guys seem to think this is exculpatory."
To the extent it rebuts the notion of a depraved heart it is precisely that.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | April 25, 2012 at 06:58 PM
A newspaper article is hardly exculpatory. But the statements from the neighbors in the article certainly cut against the grain of earlier narrative from the press and Crump, et al.
Amazingly, however, Ben F. managed to disregard those parts of the article and zoom in on the part of the article where the reporter puts his own spin into play.
Posted by: xbradtc | April 25, 2012 at 07:03 PM
"Moments later, Martin lay dead with a bullet in his chest"...right after violently attacking GZ and giving him a broken nose and busted skull. GZ saved his own life that night, and probably the lives of many others in the future.
Posted by: El Bango | April 25, 2012 at 07:05 PM
OK, DoT responds to a comment before it is made.
====================
Posted by: Wot's Up With That? | April 25, 2012 at 07:06 PM
Funny how a certain moron missed the whole argument over what Murder 2 means...
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 25, 2012 at 07:06 PM
OK, DoT responds to a comment before it is made.
Likely the troll is re-posting after he's retro-moderated.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 25, 2012 at 07:07 PM
Here's a hypothetical to consider. What would the news story have been if GZ had not had a gun?
Posted by: John Hansen | April 25, 2012 at 07:08 PM
BF,
You have no evidence whatsoever that Zimmerman disregarded the dispatcher's advice. Pure conjecture on Reuter's part and yours. In fact, the State has already conceded they have no evidence that GZ pursued Martin.
But I will concede that you have a narrative and by God you and your ilk are going to stay with come hell or high water.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | April 25, 2012 at 07:09 PM
-- But, you're all so jiggy about 'facts'...--
'Facts' like this one?;
he disregarded police advice against pursuing Martin
Posted by: Ignatz | April 25, 2012 at 07:10 PM
Identity neighbors...
Posted by: Threadkiller | April 25, 2012 at 07:11 PM
Is there a chance we can also keep my 2nd Amendment principle's intact?
Posted by: Jack is Back! | April 25, 2012 at 07:14 PM
-- Is there a chance we can also keep my 2nd Amendment principle's intact? --
Not in NJ, NY, MA, IL and a few other states.
Posted by: cboldt | April 25, 2012 at 07:16 PM
What would the news story have been if GZ had not had a gun?
A local news story about a man assaulted by an unknown subject -- if Zimmerman were lucky. A local story about an unsolved murder, if not.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 25, 2012 at 07:17 PM
In a 'bending over backwards' moment of fairness, let me tepidly defend Reuters on this:
One can argue (as I have) that GZim did not disregard the dispatchers advice that night.
However, he did disregard generic standing instructions to neighborhood watchers everywhere when he got out of the car. They use the word "protocol" to cover that.
Obviously, that is not illegal. But Reuters stayed close to the line and arguably got both feet down inside the line. This argument would be stronger if they had written something more general such as "he disregarded police advice against pursuing [any suspect] Martin."
Posted by: Tom Maguire | April 25, 2012 at 07:20 PM
Boy you can learn a lot from Dana Ward. For example, did you know that the 1st amendment extends to private blogs on the internet? Silly me, I thought it was to keep the Federal government from abridging freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.
Posted by: GMax | April 25, 2012 at 07:24 PM
The "black boys robbing the neighborhood" remark by the neighbor actually supports the "profiling" allegation, in an odd way. But I don't think that the jury, or the public, will see it that way. Only the TSA thinks it's* wrong to be suspicious of a person because he looks and acts a lot like the criminals who committed the types of crimes you are trying to prevent.
*Does that work, NK?
Posted by: boatbuilder | April 25, 2012 at 07:25 PM
I've got to swallow my meds now. One is a suppository so I will need to take a short break while I shove my head back up my ass.
Posted by: Ben Franklin | April 25, 2012 at 07:26 PM
I'm struck about how far back his mischief
and/malfeasance goes back;
Bernard Goetz shot four African-American men on a New York subway train on December 22, 1984, when they approached him and allegedly tried to rob him. At his trial Goetz was cleared of all charges except criminal possession of a weapon. Sharpton led several marches protesting what he saw as the weak prosecution of the case.[21]
Sharpton and other civil rights leaders said Goetz's actions were racist and requested a federal civil rights investigation.[22] A federal investigation concluded the shooting was due to an attempted robbery and not race.[23]
He never accepts than anything can be a mistake, except his own actions, which are
more often airbrushed by too many personages
Posted by: narciso | April 25, 2012 at 07:27 PM
"However, he did disregard generic standing instructions to neighborhood watchers everywhere when he got out of the car."
In a neighborhood that had recently suffered a hot burglary with a resident scared out of her mind and the police only minutes away. Zimmerman would then be just like his very cautious neighbors, listening to him scream for help for over a minute as they cowered in their homes.
God save me from quivering profiles in courage who believe they have done their entire duty by dialing 911.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | April 25, 2012 at 07:30 PM
Lordy, Dana sure is working himself into a froth.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 25, 2012 at 07:37 PM
--This argument would be stronger if they had written something more general such as "he disregarded police advice against pursuing [any suspect] Martin.--
And it would be even stronger if they identified the suggestion as coming from a dispatcher rather than "police".
Posted by: Ignatz | April 25, 2012 at 07:41 PM
And it's vastly entertaining.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | April 25, 2012 at 07:43 PM
I love that all afternoon Drudge has had the boyish photo of George Zimmerman up - looking very angelic and "trayvonish" (as the media portrayed Trayvon).
Posted by: centralcal | April 25, 2012 at 07:49 PM
MAKE ME THE MODERATOR, ASSWIPE@!!!
Clearly a graduate of "How to Win Friends and Influence People".
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 25, 2012 at 07:49 PM
Poof! I am so appreciating this.
Posted by: centralcal | April 25, 2012 at 07:59 PM
Remember there is always an aggressor and a victim. even if you have to make it up;
http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2012/04/25/themage-60-minutes-media-matters-and-media-narrative-building-on-christians-and-israel/
Posted by: narciso | April 25, 2012 at 08:03 PM
Looks like the downers kicked in...
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 25, 2012 at 08:04 PM
So, at last the press has caught on that GZ was a hero.How long will it take until this story makes it down to the ill informed--the bubus and Kukus and dudas and the like?
Posted by: Clarice | April 25, 2012 at 08:05 PM
OT,
Cool, but may be getting some publicity on returning a soccer ball (Wilson) to some teenager in Japan. Will keep you posted.
It is funny to call the ADN Newspaper, and to talk to various people at the paper, none of whom had heard about the story in the ADN, and having to slowly walk them through how to bring up the ADN on their computers and locate the story from yesterday, after which they finally go, "Wow, that's cool. You're not nuts. Okay, let me see who I can pass you on up too."
Off with the dogs. Later.
Posted by: daddy | April 25, 2012 at 08:09 PM
'the bubus and the Kukus and the dudas and the like
Were stumbling through the narrative when a fact showed up.
=================
Posted by: Prophylactic Pups. | April 25, 2012 at 08:10 PM
I think I would have gotten out of the car to check out the neighborhood, but breaking in on the shouting match between GZim and Martin?
Maybe shouting at them from twenty yards away (or through a window? Then they know where I live) but I would just hate to come between a drug dealer and an unsatisfied customer.
Posted by: Tom Maguire | April 25, 2012 at 08:10 PM
Very hard to penetrate that level of density, Clarice. But the average ill informed Joe and Jill Lunchpail will start to see the truth now, its going to be impossible to skittles coat this any longer.
Posted by: GMax | April 25, 2012 at 08:10 PM
So, it's the same problem with the Times, even Times writers don't read their own paper.
Posted by: narciso | April 25, 2012 at 08:11 PM
-- I would just hate to come between a drug dealer and an unsatisfied customer. --
I presume some of the neighbors recognized Zimmerman, but maybe not. I'd not be unlikely to come to the aid of a neighbor, even at some personal risk.
OTOH, I learned long ago to not get involved in a fight between strangers. Especially not if itz a catfight.
Posted by: cboldt | April 25, 2012 at 08:14 PM
Speaking of being spot on:
"How could this have happened? How could Obama be rewarded for his dereliction of duty, for his pillaging of the public treasury, subversion of the work ethic in favor of leisure class sloth, and for enriching the already rich at the expense of the working class? There are many answers including corporate control of media, the intimidation of independent reporters, the brazen manipulation of fears of terrorism, the suppression of information, corruption, and our insularity from the rest of the world. Some responsibility falls on McCain's shoulders for being too timid in his criticism of Obama, for not responding to the "flip flop" charge by pointing out that the biggest flip flopper in this campaign was the candidate who promised hope and change middle of the road populism and gave us 19th century corporate cronyism, who promised to be a uniter and produced the deepest divisions in American society in at least a generation, who promised not to be tempted by promoting American Exceptionalism and set about the demolition of the Middle East in pursuit of a quixotic mission to re-make the area in the image of his Father's dreams of a demised Western influence. But unfortunately, most of the responsibility is our own. As educators we have failed, as citizens we have failed, in our most fundamental responsibility, to speak truth to power."
Guess who? Names changed to protect the innocents and expose the guilty.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | April 25, 2012 at 08:15 PM
OK, I've got my head out of my ass now (I used to hate that gray but I just wash it away).
I was calling someone an idiot - who?
Posted by: Ben Franklin | April 25, 2012 at 08:15 PM
In the dark and flat on his back?
'John' didn't seem to recognize him. And I guess his shadow isn't distinctively identifiable.
And there was that one guy looking out his window with his wife hollering at him to get away from it.
I'd like to think I would have done something useful, but I am not so sure.
Posted by: Tom Maguire | April 25, 2012 at 08:20 PM
How long will it take until this story makes it down to the ill informed--the bubus and Kukus and dudas and the like?
You mean the type of people who still think Sacco and Vanzetti were innocent? That think the Haymarket Bomb was a frame-up? That think the Rosenbergs were innocent? Who think Bush lied about Saddam's WMD? Who think Mumia is a political prisoner?
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 25, 2012 at 08:21 PM
TM,
Listen to the 911 call with the shot on it. Someone screaming for help doesn't constitute a shouting match and witness "John's" hollering that he was going to call the cops didn't have the outcome that he was hoping for.
I wouldn't interfere in a sour drug deal but I wouldn't expect screams for help from a dealer or customer, either.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | April 25, 2012 at 08:22 PM
NBC6 Zimmerman Edit Explanation - April 25
Well, that's a step up from "mistakes were made."Posted by: cboldt | April 25, 2012 at 08:23 PM
An error in editorial judgment ensued.
Posted by: Ignatz | April 25, 2012 at 08:24 PM
Funny story, 74% of jobs lost were government. Plus the Feds say the unemoyment rate went down. Lies, damn lies & statistics...
My property tax bill did not go up (first time since I got to WI). A fact.
Dana, stay away from sharp objects in June.
Posted by: henry | April 25, 2012 at 08:24 PM
Crump suffering from confirmation bias:
This just verifies that Zimmerman bought the gun to hunt boi down like a dog!
Posted by: Redbrow | April 25, 2012 at 08:25 PM
The impact of the report has been weakened because it took so long to be make it public. Now it looks like an excuse. The comments show that a percentage still buy the original "truth."
Posted by: Frau Steingehirn | April 25, 2012 at 08:25 PM
The Bens
Posted by: Threadkiller | April 25, 2012 at 08:26 PM
Some disillusioned leftist crank would be my guess, JiB. Not exactly a Nader or Van den Heuvel rant, but in that neighborhood. Not anyone in elective office.
The phrase "speak truth to power" identifies the author as a priggish, self-righteous fool.
Am I close?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | April 25, 2012 at 08:26 PM
-- In the dark and flat on his back? --
By his voice maybe. I don't know how well known George is/was to the neighbors, and I'm not sure John doesn't know him, even if John doesn't recognize him.
Zimmerman seemed surprised or taken aback that nobody came to his aid, is where I get the impression that some of the neighbors might have recognized him.
Just saying, I wouldn't be so sure that all the witnesses thought it might be something like two thugs having it out; drug deal gone bade, etc.
Posted by: cboldt | April 25, 2012 at 08:28 PM
The Bens = coming up too fast from deep inside the cloaca maxima.
Posted by: Frau Lokus | April 25, 2012 at 08:35 PM
He was surprised because he would have responded. Kinda like he responded to the need for a Neighborhood Watch to be instituted. Not everyone will cede property or territory to thieves and thugs just because the "safe" thing to do is dial 911 and huddle in the dark.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | April 25, 2012 at 08:35 PM
Dana, whichever "Ben" went "poof". Of course it was confusing, Gov's numbers don't mean much until the adjustment cycle is complete.
Posted by: henry | April 25, 2012 at 08:35 PM
Apparently, it comes from a Nor Luap blog
Posted by: narciso | April 25, 2012 at 08:35 PM
However it was 'cribbed' from this;
http://www.pitzer.edu/spotlight/04-05_
academic_year/2004-11 election2004_articles.
asp
Posted by: narciso | April 25, 2012 at 08:40 PM
--No one said anything about 'a depraved heart.--
Mrs. Corey did when she charged Zimmerman with murder 2 which is what it would rebut.
Unless you're hanging your hat on 'heart' vs 'mind'.
Posted by: Ignatz | April 25, 2012 at 08:42 PM
"If that neighbor is put on the stand and so testifies, or if the police testify that there had been African American teenagers identified as burglars in the neighborhood, the case is toast, as is the DA."
Why would other African American teenagers identified as burglars mean that George Zimmerman's shooting of Trayvon Martin was justified? If that argument was made in court, I think the prosecution would dispose of it pretty quickly. The legitimacy of Zimmerman's self-defense claim depends on whether the person in front of him -- Trayvon Martin -- was trying to kill him, not on whether other African American teenagers had committed burglaries. I mean, you just cannot argue that. It's not a legitimate argument.
Posted by: Kathy Kattenburg | April 25, 2012 at 08:45 PM
George Zimmerman is pictured making a pizza in a home economics class at Osbourn High School in Manassas, Virginia
Photo accompanying the Reuters article. Good 400 pounder, pushing 8 foot tall man, very scary.
Posted by: cboldt | April 25, 2012 at 08:46 PM
I suppose we could begin and end with Wikipedia, which is generally as far as you have to go with this stupid shit:
"Depraved-heart murder, also known as depraved-indifference murder, is an American legal term for an action that demonstrates a 'callous disregard for human life' and results in death. In most states, depraved heart killings constitute second-degree murder."
Posted by: Danube of Thought | April 25, 2012 at 08:48 PM
Another round of Inigo Montoya;
http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-us-vs-uk-growth-2012-4
Posted by: narciso | April 25, 2012 at 08:49 PM
Ignatz@8:24 - 'An error in editorial judgment ensued.'
Love it...
Posted by: Beasts of England | April 25, 2012 at 08:52 PM
I'm no lawyer, but you're a pretty dim bulb there Kathy.
I'll let the lawyers do the evisceration.
Posted by: Donald | April 25, 2012 at 08:52 PM
We now have the bookends of the Obama presidency. It began with the Cambridge Police acting stupidly, and will end with "If I had a son he would look like Trayvon".
His wisdom fully on display.
Posted by: Jane | April 25, 2012 at 08:53 PM
I'm amazed at the cunning shown by the hulking brute, Zimmerman, going back as far as posing as an altar boy for ten years in order to disguise his telltale heart.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | April 25, 2012 at 08:54 PM
I'm wondering how long it will take the MSM to highlight the gang activities within the Sanford area. These range anywhere from real gangs to association gangs, like the group of girls who "brutally beat a teenager in a laundromat" (http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/crime/sanford-teen-beaten-by-gang-of-girls-at-82883.html)
And, we have the Central Florida Dream Center reporting "Out of the 11 areas of poverty located in Seminole County Florida, nine can be found in Sanford Florida. These sections of the city are plagued by crime, drugs, gangs, domestic violence, child abuse, rape, AIDS, poor health, illiteracy and many other dire situations."
The only reason there aren't major gangs like MS-13, East Coast Crips, Latin Kings, Black Guerrilla Family, etc, is because Sanford is in the ass end of nowhere.
Posted by: William Teach | April 25, 2012 at 08:54 PM
KK, Do you really suppose anyone was making that argument ? Honestly? How full of it can a person be and still breathe?
Posted by: Clarice | April 25, 2012 at 08:55 PM
"Why would other African American teenagers identified as burglars mean that George Zimmerman's shooting of Trayvon Martin was justified?"
What justifies the shooting is the fact that he had had his nose broken and was on his back with his head being bashed against the sidewalk, and was in reasonable fear that the violent felony that was already being committed upon him would continue.
What is justified by Martin's status was an increased suspicion that he was up to no good. Zimmerman--an African-American himself--could more reasonably suspect that an unknown African-American prowling the neighborhood was more likely than, say, a teenage white girl to be one of the burglars that had been terrorizing his neighbors.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | April 25, 2012 at 08:58 PM
Clarice,
Careful. She's gonna take that as a request for a demonstration.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | April 25, 2012 at 08:58 PM
-- I'm wondering how long it will take the MSM to highlight the gang activities within the Sanford area. --
Big Oxycodone outlet too. DEA came down on a local pharmacy for something like a 500x "normal" volume. Customers would ask for the desired brand using the street slang terms.
High crime rate, even by Florida standards.
Posted by: cboldt | April 25, 2012 at 08:59 PM
The same kind of people that fall for this; 'pull my finger'
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/25/us-iran-nuclear-russia-idUSBRE83O1CH20120425?feedType=RSS&feedName=Iran&virtualBrandChannel=10209&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&dlvrit=59365
Posted by: narciso | April 25, 2012 at 09:01 PM
Ask KK if profiling is wrong. I am sure she thinks its absolutely horrible.
Posted by: GMax | April 25, 2012 at 09:02 PM
--Well Ig, Danyooob is exacting with me, so I am exacting with Danyooob. Does that seem fair?--
But once you get past that inconsequential point you're wrong.
Posted by: Ignatz | April 25, 2012 at 09:04 PM
I mean, you just cannot argue that. It's not a legitimate argument.
KK, we'll cede to you the mastery of the illegitimate argument.
(You really don't understand what's being discussed, do you?)
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 25, 2012 at 09:08 PM
You mean the fake Ben is not GMAX. Could have fooled me.
Posted by: Sara | April 25, 2012 at 09:12 PM
I bet the property/violent crime stats in Sanford are way lower than those in Miami Gardens where Trayvon spent his entire life.
Posted by: DebinNC | April 25, 2012 at 09:14 PM
Someone needs their meds.
Posted by: fdcol63 | April 25, 2012 at 09:20 PM
More:
"JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- George Zimmerman is in custody in Florida and will be charged with second-degree murder in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, authorities announced Wednesday. His attorney said he would plead not guilty.
"'Essentially she's saying he had the intent to do something that was so dangerous to Trayvon Martin, he would know he would be killed,' said Janet Johnson, Jacksonville criminal defense attorney.
"'Second-degree murder is also called murder with a depraved heart,' Johnson explained. 'Basically, doing something so depraved that you would know someone's life would be at risk, but you acted anyway.'"
Are we ready to move on from this fool's latest pratfall, or do we want more?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | April 25, 2012 at 09:22 PM
The Kats
Posted by: Threadkiller | April 25, 2012 at 09:22 PM
Afro-Peruvian? Curiouser and curiouser.
Posted by: Beasts of England | April 25, 2012 at 09:23 PM
--"would continue" supposition without supporting evidence.--
I'd say the dead body of Martin constitutes considerable supporting evidence that Zim believed it would continue.
Posted by: Ignatz | April 25, 2012 at 09:24 PM
I just read that NBC6 "explanation" - are they kidding me?
Let's start with "What story are they talking about - on air, on website, or both?"
Then, what about the March 20 website stuff?
What about the re-edits that disappeared the problem on April 9 with no "explanation" - are they still investigating that? Or did it take them another two weeks to realize they had made the corrections silently?
How does this connect to the Today Show - they can't be pretending it is a coincidence, so where did the bad edit originate?
I don't think even KK would be fooled by this explanation.
Posted by: Tom Maguire | April 25, 2012 at 09:24 PM
John Brown could spell Osawatomie.
==============
Posted by: Trampling through the vineyards. | April 25, 2012 at 09:24 PM
NO really, I am certain KK and the douchebag from Pitzer think Zimmerman shot Martin cuz he would not share his skittles.
Posted by: GMax | April 25, 2012 at 09:25 PM
Does the truth matter anymore, two months later, they finally get around to the facts
of the case, but it's a little late, because
the poison is already in the bloodstream,
For years to come, Zimmerman is marked by the scarlet M of the 'Drive By Media.
This situation eerily parallels the Goetz one,a quarter century ago, and Bonfire, there was no malice, just a tragic intersection between two people, but the wolfpack feeds just the same. What is the proper punishment for Burnside, who so cavalierly 'libeled' Zimmerman.
Posted by: narciso | April 25, 2012 at 09:28 PM
Question -- was the bint I traded twitters with from NBC6? Because she claimed it was all the network's doing.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | April 25, 2012 at 09:28 PM
That's kind of an indelicate way to put, it,
Rob, but yes, that is her.
Posted by: narciso | April 25, 2012 at 09:31 PM
Still more, this time from WebLaw:
"Under F.S.A. § 782.04 (2), second degree murder is:
"(2) The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated by any act imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life, although without any premeditated design to effect the death of any particular individual, is murder in the second degree and constitutes a felony of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years not exceeding life or as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
"Fla. Stat. Ann. § 782.04 (West).
"In some jurisdictions, this is know as the depraved-heart murder."
Posted by: Danube of Thought | April 25, 2012 at 09:31 PM
--The legitimacy of Zimmerman's self-defense claim depends on whether the person in front of him -- Trayvon Martin -- was trying to kill him, not on whether other African American teenagers had committed burglaries.--
If that is the sole issue, Kathy, and none of what has occurred in the past with black teenagers or Zimmerman has any bearing on this case why have you and buub and others cluttered up this place for a month with nonsensical arguments about innocent little boys just chompin on some Skittles and racism and lynchings and cold blooded murder and wannabe cops who weigh 250 pounds and who didn't have a single injury to show for his troubles?
Posted by: Ignatz | April 25, 2012 at 09:31 PM
I want KK to tell us whether George Zimmerman is an African-American.
Next I want her to tell us whether Homer Plessy was an African-American.
Finally, tell os whether Barck Obama is an African-American.
Please explain each of your three answers, KK.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | April 25, 2012 at 09:37 PM