Elizabeth Warren finally admits the obvious when fced with overwheming circumstantial evidence:
Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren acknowledged for the first time late Wednesday night that she told Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania that she was Native American, but she continued to insist that race played no role in her recruitment.
“At some point after I was hired by them, I . . . provided that information to the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard,’’ she said in a statement issued by her campaign. “My Native American heritage is part of who I am, I’m proud of it and I have been open about it.’’
Warren’s statement is her first acknowledgment that she identified herself as Native American to the Ivy League schools.
Here first acknowledgment? That is putting it kindly. Here is the Boston Herald from May 4, reporting what sounds like a specific denial:
Warren — who has been dogged by questions about whether she used her claims of Cherokee lineage to further her career — has insisted she never authorized Harvard Law to count her as a Native American in the mid-1990s, when the school was under fire for not having enough minority professors.
So why the change of position?
Warren’s new statement came after the Globe asked her campaign about documents it obtained Wednesday from Harvard’s library showing that the university’s law school began reporting a Native American female professor in federal statistics for the 1992-93 school year, the first year Warren worked at Harvard, as a visiting professor.
...
The Harvard records do not list a Native American during the years Warren returned to her post at the University of Pennsylvania, but begin to list one in 1995-96, when she returned to Cambridge as a tenured professor.
Well, vigorous sleuthing has cracked the Case of the Missing Inspirational Minority.
And do let's note - the press is losing patience with their Golden Girl. Here is a Boston Herald columnist noting that he has been the only guy supporting her so in return he gets a short, unhelpful phone call about something else.
And the NY Times plays the oldest trick in the aggrieved reporter's book - print the transcript! Here they describe Ms. Warren's joint appearance with Massachusetts Governor Deval:
While recent polling shows Ms. Warren running dead even with Mr. Brown, questions about her heritage have consumed the campaign.
...[T]he Warren campaign gave the news media about 90 minutes’ notice that Mr. Patrick would appear at her headquarters and that they would hold a news conference.
This raised expectations that Ms. Warren might discuss her ancestry in greater detail than she has. But the event was orchestrated to discourage detailed questioning by including about 150 loyal Warren supporters who booed when reporters asked about it.
...
A reporter said to Ms. Warren that critics were calling her character into question, prompting the supporters in the room to boo and hiss.
Mr. Patrick told them that “even when we don’t like the question, we’ve got to let it be asked.” Turning back to the news media, he said, “We don’t care about that subject.”
Asked whether the issue spoke to Ms. Warren’s character, Mr. Patrick said, “I think I have answered that.”
“Can she answer it?” the reporter said.
Ms. Warren said she would defer to the governor.
“So, you’re not answering, basically?” the reporter asked. Ms. Warren replied, “You just don’t like the answer.”
That's not an answer.
I tuned in in the middle of Obama's remarkd, and missed the digs at Bush. I shoulda known better.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 31, 2012 at 06:35 PM
Great hashish they are smoking over at the WaPo today.
"No one is alleging that Warren used her minority status to get her jobs..."
Posted by: daddy | May 31, 2012 at 06:35 PM
Warren defends personal history, tells Brown that family is off-limits
Posted by: Extraneus | May 31, 2012 at 06:39 PM
Scottie Centerfold is the luckiest POS in the world.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 31, 2012 at 06:49 PM
Romney now up in Ohio
Posted by: Sara | May 31, 2012 at 06:55 PM
I could be wrong but I'm guessing that I've been in management longer than most people here, and I can just about guarantee that there was never a discussion between Warren and HLS or any other school about her Indian claims. This stuff just can't come up in an interview, or even a post-employment discussion. It's a major no-no to talk about anything related to such things, and surely lawyers would be careful not to ever touch the subject.
The only way a respectable organization can classify an employee as a minority is if the employee self-identified as such. And nobody in such an organization would dream of challenging a self-identification. There's no upside to it. The organization benefits from having the minority on their staff, and everybody involved knows it.
Warren self-identified. She checked the box, either on her application or in a post-employment document, and once the box is checked, it's almost impossible to imagine how it could have been unchecked unless she were to subsequently go through some trouble to uncheck it herself.
Posted by: Extraneus | May 31, 2012 at 06:56 PM
And in more poll news:
Posted by: Sara | May 31, 2012 at 07:00 PM
I could be wrong but I'm guessing that I've been in management longer than most people here, and I can just about guarantee that there was never a discussion between Warren and HLS or any other school about her Indian claims. This stuff just can't come up in an interview, or even a post-employment discussion. It's a major no-no to talk about anything related to such things, and surely lawyers would be careful not to ever touch the subject.
Ext: You make a good point.
I know that in newspaper advertising, there was a major crackdown on what we could say in employment ads. There could be nothing, absolutely zero, zilch, of any wording that even implied age, gender, race, or ethnicity (except of course the requirement of bilingual talents). We were even restricted to certain wording in rental ads for fear of being accused of some kind of red lining by implication. This rule was relaxed slightly to accommodate senior facilities of 55 and older, but even then we had certain boilerplate that had been approved by legal that had to be included.
Posted by: Sara | May 31, 2012 at 07:07 PM
Rocco,
You need to put that on a billboard.
Posted by: Jane | May 31, 2012 at 07:07 PM
"Warren defends personal history, tells Brown that family is off-limits"
Why the hell is that off limits if Lizzy and her family are so damn proud of their Indian ancestry?
If any of us had put on official pieces of paper that we were Irish or Indian or Jewish or Polish or Mormon or whatever the hell we are these last 20 years, why now is that offensive to be asked about it?
1985 "I'm Indian
1986 "I'm Indian
1987 "I'm Indian
1988 "I'm Indian
1987 "I'm Indian
1988 "I'm Indian
1990 "I'm Indian
1991 "I'm Indian
1992 "I'm Indian
1993 "I'm Indian
1994 "I'm Indian
1995 "I'm Indian
1996 "I'm Indian
1997 "I'm Indian
1998 "I'm Indian
1999 "I'm Indian
2000 "I'm Indian
2001 "I'm Indian
2002 "I'm Indian
2003 "I'm Indian
2004 "I'm Indian
2005 "I'm Indian
2006 "I'm Indian...
It is offensive of you people to ask me about my Indian heritage.
Dog walk time.
Posted by: daddy | May 31, 2012 at 07:10 PM
Thanks all, in my haste to post it, I forgot to resize...
Posted by: Rocco | May 31, 2012 at 07:19 PM
I dunno about billboards but that would sure make a great poster.
Nice work, Rocco.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 31, 2012 at 07:28 PM
Today's FWDAJ podcast, where Dick advises Daddy on local politics.
Posted by: Jane | May 31, 2012 at 07:36 PM
Thanks Rick...she really is a boob!
Posted by: Rocco | May 31, 2012 at 07:49 PM
Volokh: Asian-Americans, Affirmative Action, and Fisher v. Texas
Posted by: Extraneus | May 31, 2012 at 07:54 PM
Her family's fair game since she brought them into the fray.
Elizabeth Warren shares family business
Posted by: Rocco | May 31, 2012 at 08:03 PM
So Brown somewhat magnanimously puts out a suggestion as to how Lizzie might not have been lying, and he's "hammering her family"?
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 31, 2012 at 08:05 PM
'--It's no skin off my back to put down that I've got some Indian in me--
The PC police have declared that particualr metaphor hate speech in the context of Injuns.'
Posted by: Ignatz | May 31, 2012 at 02:01 PM
My high cheekbones are offended, that's for sure...
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 31, 2012 at 08:38 PM
And didn't Lieawatha criticize Brown for keeping his daughter on Obama's health care plan?
http://articles.boston.com/2012-05-02/politics/31533998_1_health-care-law-senator-scott-brown-family-insurance-plans
Posted by: Rocco | May 31, 2012 at 08:42 PM
In an address to the nurses, Ms. Warren talked about the struggles of growing up in a working class family and said those experiences molded her views.
Again, she invokes her family...Fair Game!
http://www.telegram.com/article/20120512/NEWS/105129948/1052/newsrewind
Posted by: Rocco | May 31, 2012 at 08:47 PM
Massachusetts senate candidate Elizabeth Warren is continuing to introduce herself to the voters of the state, releasing a new ad that both tells the tale of her family history as well as pulls together the threads of the current debate over the economy, taxes and education.
Warren Continues Introducing Herself In “Kids Like Me” [VIDEO]
Posted by: Rocco | May 31, 2012 at 08:56 PM
Extraneus is right. None of this was ever mentioned out loud. Penn and HLS saw the directory info, Warren knew they saw the directory info, and nothing else needed to be said.
Remember, other white people were probably up for these jobs. With AA there is always an implicit threat of litigation if the minority candidate is passed over for a white candidate. This was absolutely ridiculous in the case of Warren, but nevertheless the threat existed, and HR administrators are the most cowardly people on earth.
For multiple reasons everyone wanted that box checked. And so it was checked.
Posted by: Porchlight | May 31, 2012 at 09:14 PM
Has Dick been right about anything?
Posted by: Clarice | May 31, 2012 at 09:21 PM
Q: What's the difference between Elizabeth Warren and Barack Obama?
A: One of them has high bones on her cheeks, while the other one gets cheeky when high.
Posted by: hit and run | May 31, 2012 at 09:24 PM
Clarice:
Has Dick been right about anything?
He hired Jane.
But since then...
Posted by: hit and run | May 31, 2012 at 09:25 PM
Obama's prominent cheekbones are on his wife.
And they're in the back.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 31, 2012 at 09:33 PM
Jane,
I loved part 1! Fine job from Dick answering my question. His response made a great amount of sense to me and was much appreciated. Listening to my name over the radio I felt like Steve Martin in "The Jerk": "I'm in the phone book!, I'm in the phone book!"
It really does sound like you 2 had fun today. Great bit on you asking Dick where he heard about the Bishops suing Obama and pointing out that it came entirely from alternative media, except for a measly 19 seconds worth from some drive-by MSM comment. That point flowed beautifully from your earlier bit on the use of facebook/twitter by candidates, and I think your disagreement as to the importance of the new media forms, as opposed to Dicks somewhat pooh-poohing that notion, was spot on.
Also I really get a kick out of listening to Dick's accent, especially "I sar" for "I saw".
I'll get to part 2 and "Swatting" later. Thanks for posting that.
Posted by: daddy | June 01, 2012 at 12:38 AM
"And didn't Lieawatha criticize Brown for keeping his daughter on Obama's health care plan?"
Damn straight Rocco,
Great point.
Posted by: daddy | June 01, 2012 at 12:41 AM
Part of what makes yesterday's idiocy so pungent;
http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2012/05/30/smersh-and-memory/
Posted by: narciso | June 01, 2012 at 12:44 AM
Daddy, LIBTARDS like Sacashyte Churchill Warren, do not mean FAMILY is off limits, they mean THEIR family is off limits, to rebuttal. Libs are not honest.
Posted by: Gus | June 01, 2012 at 12:52 AM
ZBY020120601 Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.
http://www.cheaphatwholesale.com
Posted by: Cheap New Era Hats | June 01, 2012 at 02:22 AM
“In the 1930s, when my parents got married, these were hard issues,’’ Warren said. “My father’s family so objected to my mother’s Native American heritage that my mother told me they had to elope.
I swear that this is the longest train wreck I can remember. I'm running out of popcorn.
Posted by: Neo | June 01, 2012 at 01:08 PM
Dd
Posted by: gorpmonger | June 02, 2012 at 06:38 PM
I find it hard to believe the only alternative for survival is to chase down a bear or cat with dogs in order to supply your family with food.
Posted by: justin bieber shoes | June 06, 2012 at 05:51 AM