Andrew Ferguson writes in The Weekly Standard on
The New Phrenology
How liberal psychopundits understand the conservative brain.
His gist - lefty social scientists churn out "studies" proving that lefties are more thoughtful, more reflective, mor compassionate, and just all around better people; other lefties review their breakthrough stuff and it gets published and quoted. However, the studies are silly and, given the absurd sampling, only have the potential of offering insight into the values and thought processes of undergraduate Asian-American psych majors.
Just for fun (OK, "fun", but for some of us it is), here is pundit Thomas Edsall, writing in the NY Times and citing some of the same papers mocked and debunked by Ferguson.
TO BE FAIR: Ferguson makes much of the fact that the samples look nothing like America, or really, anywhere except maybe the psych department of a California university. However, the authors claim that their resutls show no sensitivity to race or gender. Maybe!
That still leaves us wondering whether twenty year old psych majors really have the same approach to life as, I don't know forty year old self-employed businessman. Or union workers.
OT: He is more than insecure. He is off his rocker.
(h/t Insty)
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 15, 2012 at 10:39 AM
Linky goes nowhere, Jack.
Posted by: Ignatz | May 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM
I am glad you linked to this Tom because Andrew Ferguson also mentioned Jonathan Haidt's book The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. He didn't love it either. I am concerned by the large number of commentators who love that book. Probably because they believe it portrays the Right as being reasonable.
A careful reading of the book though has Haidt pushing the cultivation of emotion over intellect. I think history conclusively shows us that is a dangerous position for educators to take.
If Haidt's emphasis was not planned, it nevertheless dovetails magnificently with the current Outcomes Based Education emphasis of his UVa colleagues as the College of Education.
LUN is today's blog post on just how much the emotional instead of knowledge and the intellect is driving national ed reform. And what I did not put in post but will generate interest here. Yes, AERA is the organization that thought Bill Ayers should have a leadership role a few years ago.
Posted by: rse | May 15, 2012 at 10:43 AM
Jonah Goldberg adds some interesting commentary re the Ferguson article here.
Key paragraph: "Oh and one last point about the interpretations of these studies. The core — hyper-liberal — assumption behind them is that the more liberal emotional or cognitive states are superior. In this study, it’s taken as a given that having more compassion is better than having too little. But that depends, doesn’t it? One can be too compassionate (or open-minded, or nuanced etc). This study could also demonstrate that “conservatives” get bored more quickly by pointless emotional bleating in lab conditions."
Posted by: AliceH | May 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM
China slowing more than headline GDP numbers show.
Posted by: Ignatz | May 15, 2012 at 10:48 AM
This looks like a niche for the Identity Teenager when he reaches his majority.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 15, 2012 at 10:48 AM
If it says Berkeley , Berkeley , Berkeley on the label
It's a turkey, turkey, turkey
Posted by: Clarice | May 15, 2012 at 10:52 AM
--In this study, it’s taken as a given that having more compassion is better than having too little. But that depends, doesn’t it? One can be too compassionate (or open-minded, or nuanced etc).--
I question the original premise. The liberals guilt-tinged, pitiful sympathy for others does not equal compassion any more than I demonstrate compassion for my kids by feeling sorry for them and never disciplining them.
Lefty "compassion" equals dependency and despondency for its 'beneficiaries' and state coercion and confiscation from its "donors" and of course it yields the side benefit of immense power for them to enforce their "compassion".
Posted by: Ignatz | May 15, 2012 at 10:55 AM
For a chuckle or two go to #ObamaInHistory at Twitter. C&P won't work because I am on mobile twitter. Worth the visit.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 15, 2012 at 10:56 AM
Iggy,
My iPad must not be the right vehicle for linking but go to The Anchoress. He really is a meglomaniac narcisstic.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 15, 2012 at 10:59 AM
Here's the link JiB referred to: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/theanchoress/2012/05/15/pity-the-president/
Incredible.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 15, 2012 at 11:13 AM
Liberals measure compassion by how much taxpayer money you believe should be spent. That's a pretty easy kind of compassion to have.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | May 15, 2012 at 11:15 AM
Thanks CH and JiB.
What a ponce.
Posted by: Ignatz | May 15, 2012 at 11:19 AM
Thomas Edsall seems to draw on the meme that all "rich" folks are Republicans.
If that's so, just who were all those folks that Obama hit up for a million dollars the other night ? .. Republicans ?? LOL
Otherwise, I just might not have much to compalin about with “Higher Social Class Predicts Increased Unethical Behavior.”
The paper, by Paul K. Piff of the University of California, Berkeley, and four colleagues, reports that members of the upper class are more likely than others to behave unethically, to lie during negotiations, to drive illegally and to cheat when competing for a prize.
Let's see that certainly sounds a lot like Lindsay Lohan (D-Hollywood) and many of the Hollywood crowd who certainly aren't dominated by Republicans.
Posted by: Neo | May 15, 2012 at 11:20 AM
And... here's a link to the twitter hashtag #ObamaInHistory
I believe that hash was inspired by Commentary post, headline "Obama Drops His Name Into the Other Presidential Biographies"
Posted by: AliceH | May 15, 2012 at 11:22 AM
Also, Democrats like like Wall Street is dominated by Republicans. The face of Wall Street this past week was Jamie Dimon (D-JPMorgan). He isn't just a Democrat, but a lifetime Democrat.
Posted by: Neo | May 15, 2012 at 11:25 AM
I recommend the Ferguson article. It is hilarious (in a dry way) as well as insightful. I'd forgotten what a great writer he is.
Also "New phrenology" is a perfect title/catchphrase.
Posted by: Porchlight | May 15, 2012 at 11:29 AM
McClintock tries to dumb it down to the lowest common denominator.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oG-Pvkqiblw
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 15, 2012 at 11:31 AM
Every hour I am here at the car dealer for service the cost goes up another $200. This time its a new windshield washer pump. Funny how front brakes, pumps, tires, etc need replacing within a few K of the warranty expiring:)
My entry at #ObamaInHistory: Killed Osama more thn once.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 15, 2012 at 11:31 AM
I know; as a former Justice said(paraphrased)
conservative obscenity, when I see it.
Before retiring from the Supreme Court in 2009, liberal Justice David Souter penned a dissent so critical of the court's conservative justices, Chief Justice John Roberts went to great lengths to prevent it from being published. That's one of the clams from The New Yorker's epic dissection of the 2010 Supreme Court Decision Citizens United vs. the Federal Election Commission. Taking us inside the legal wranglings of the high-profile case, staff writer Jeffrey Toobin describes a dissent Souter wrote at the end of his tenure at the Supreme Court. The argument, which remains unpublished, accused Roberts of engineering the outcome of the Citizens United case:
Souter wrote a dissent that aired some of the Court’s dirty laundry. By definition, dissents challenge the legal conclusions of the majority, but Souter accused the Chief Justice of violating the Court’s own procedures to engineer the result he wanted.
Roberts didn’t mind spirited disagreement on the merits of any case, but Souter’s attack—an extraordinary, bridge-burning farewell to the Court—could damage the Court’s credibility. So the Chief came up with a strategically ingenious maneuver.
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/05/how-justice-souter-almost-left-supreme-court-blaze-glory/52300/
Posted by: Equus | May 15, 2012 at 11:32 AM
Horse shit.
Posted by: Ignatz | May 15, 2012 at 11:46 AM
The “powerful” students—that is, the students who said on the questionnaire that they were feeling powerful that morning—showed less dramatic reactions to the stories than other students. Or, as the professors put it: “Our data suggest that social power attenuates emotional reactions to those who suffer.”
You can interpret this many ways. It could be said the heroric figures, like Medal of Honor winners, move past the pain to do something more than curl up in a ball and weep at other's pain. This doesn't make them any less compassionate. It just means they channel their reactions differently.
Posted by: Neo | May 15, 2012 at 11:50 AM
W.M.Briggs,statistician to the stars,is forever delving into the self serving studies that purport to show conservatives as stupid or insane.
In this post he links some of his favorite debunkings of this ridiculous genre of 'social science' nonsense.
Posted by: Kevin B | May 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM
O/T - my 2 favorite comments so far re #ObamaInHistory (article, not twitter):
First comes inserting himself into the record. Next comes airbrushing others out.
and
Obama has always been president of Eastasia.
Posted by: AliceH | May 15, 2012 at 12:04 PM
Name a single liberal policy that works.
JUST ONE.
Liberals continue to pander to groups in exchange for votes. The black family unit has nearly been destroyed by this.
Liberals KNOW that their policies don't work, so they convince themselves that CONSERVTIVES/TEABAGGERS/the GOP etc are hate filled bigots. So their consciences don't ache. Liberals continue destructive policies, because the only other option is to be relegated as the extinct Democrat party.
In the end, their compa$$ion i$ your ca$h, and their vote$.
Posted by: Gus | May 15, 2012 at 12:05 PM
Tom--
interesting that you post this ferguson article immediately after a post about the inevitability of 'gay marriage'. You correctly highlight the lefty sociological nonsense that comes out of 'social experimentation' and the risible conclusions that sputter out of the lefty mind that is closed shut to empirical evidence. So why, do you seem to embrace the need for 'gay marriage' experimentation, when it will only ruin the lives of many children, just like every lefty social experiment that came before 'gay marriage.' Permanently fouling up marriage and children is nothing to be glib about.
Posted by: NK | May 15, 2012 at 12:07 PM
Did youse notice that Jerry Brown described the enormity of the Cal deficit as "unexpected"? Snicker. The most used word of the last three years. Look for lib history books to describe the Obama presidency as an "unexpected" failure.
Posted by: Jim Ryan | May 15, 2012 at 12:13 PM
#ObamaInHistory
Deserves the full bgates treatment.
Posted by: hit and run | May 15, 2012 at 12:16 PM
JimR-- California's current insolvency and then bankruptcy when pension fund bills come due is as predictable as day following night. The Golden State will need Federal legislation allowing access to the federal bankruptcy Code to restructure bond debt and pension obligations. same for Illinois and RI, Christy may have saved NJ just in time..
Posted by: NK | May 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM
Meanwhile Wisconsin is solvent and anticipates a budget surplus in the next year.
RECALL WALKER!!!!
Posted by: Gus | May 15, 2012 at 12:23 PM
An interesting interview of Henry Kissinger after his TSA defenestration. LUN. Heh...
Posted by: matt | May 15, 2012 at 12:23 PM
Re: the #ObamainHistory - I just don't understand. I wouldn't have thought it possible for anyone to be as narcissistic and tone-deaf as Zero and his lackeys.
How is this not fodder for ridicule not just here and among Conservatives, but in the wider culture?
If it were Bush...hell, even if it were Clinton who'd done this, they'd be roasted alive in the MSM.
But it's Obama and...crickets.
Posted by: James D. | May 15, 2012 at 12:27 PM
Anyone here remember when liberals were all about free speech?
Posted by: MarkO | May 15, 2012 at 12:27 PM
hit, many M.A. theses will be written in attempt to "explain" how Obama ended up a failure against all odds. It will remain a classic "problem" to assign as a term paper topic for many generations. The papers and theses which most impressively place the blame elsewhere than Obama and liberal ideology will score an "A". The papers which just scratch their heads a "B" (and if eloquent, "B+"). Those attributing the failure to Obama and liberal ideology will have "too simplistic" and "too ideological" written in the margins with the grade "D".
Posted by: Jim Ryan | May 15, 2012 at 12:30 PM
I love these studies, and more ironically how much the left *needs* these studies.
One of the few things a typical liberal needs is to be told how righteous and smart they are, yet they keep producing these studies to tell them how righteous and smart they are, and just as important, how stupid and wicked their opponents are.
I guess they need it to counter all that real world data about what their policies actually do to humanity. Probably couldn't sleep at night if they understood that reality.
Posted by: Some guy | May 15, 2012 at 12:36 PM
OK. Let's get to work on mocking this stuff:
FROM THE OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE WEB SITE:
"James Buchanan, the 15th president, was the only American president never to marry. Barack Obama has supported the largest expansion or marriage rights in American history."
Posted by: MarkO | May 15, 2012 at 12:40 PM
During his term in office, James Buchanan dismissed Brigham Young, a combative Mormon, as the governor of the Utah Territory. He ordered more than one thousand soldiers to go to Utah to put down the Mormon rebellion.
During his very first term, Obama ordered more than one thousand media outlets to crush the Mormon rebellion of Mitt Romney.
Posted by: MarkO | May 15, 2012 at 12:40 PM
The Heritage Foundation’s Rory Cooper tweeted that Obama had casually dropped his own name into Ronald Reagan’s official biography on www.whitehouse.gov, claiming credit for taking up the mantle of Reagan’s tax reform advocacy with his “Buffett Rule” gimmick. My first thought was, he must be joking. But he wasn’t—it turns out Obama has added bullet points bragging about his own accomplishments to the biographical sketches of every single U.S. president since Calvin Coolidge (except, for some reason, Gerald Ford).
Will no one rid me of this meddlesome politician ?
Posted by: Neo | May 15, 2012 at 12:42 PM
I guess they need it to counter all that real world data about what their policies actually do to humanity. Probably couldn't sleep at night if they understood that reality.
I can tell you that 99% of the liberals I know have zero idea what their policies actually do to humanity. Where would they learn about it? Not from the schools, and not from the media, and not from most historians.
Posted by: Porchlight | May 15, 2012 at 12:43 PM
neo....better be careful or you'll get a visit from the SS.
Posted by: matt | May 15, 2012 at 12:44 PM
This from Obama the 1st Gay Presidents' bio at WHITEHOUSE.GOV.
President Barack Obama the 1st gay President, once kissed a girl, and he didn't like it.
Swear to God.
Posted by: Gus | May 15, 2012 at 12:51 PM
#ObamaInHistory: I'm shamelessly stealing all of Dan Foster's NRO post
Posted by: AliceH | May 15, 2012 at 12:51 PM
re: "visit from the SS".
As time goes forward, I am more and more concerned for the safety of Mitt Romney. There are a lot of hysterics out there, and if the polls start to solidify with a stable Romney advantage, well, I worry.
off topic: a memorable phrase noted at instapundit, noting that BHO has not really ever had a job:
"My kids have contributed more to GDP already in their young lives than Obama has done in his."
Posted by: Jim,MtnView,Ca,USA | May 15, 2012 at 12:55 PM
((The liberals guilt-tinged, pitiful sympathy for others does not equal compassion any more than I demonstrate compassion for my kids by feeling sorry for them and never disciplining them.))
exactly exactly exactly.
Posted by: Chubby | May 15, 2012 at 12:57 PM
James K. Polk oversaw the entry of Texas into the Union. Barack Obama is trying his best to turn over Texas to the Mexicans by allowing as many as they can muster to stream into Texas to make it Mexican again. Through the inovative use of arms sales to Mexican cartels, the President is circumventing the laws of both the US and Mexico to help bring death and estruction to both nations.
Santa Ana proposes, Brack Obama disposes.
Posted by: Neo | May 15, 2012 at 12:58 PM
Whitehouse Website:
All kidding aside -- I know it's hard-- but the Once is a sick man. His narcissism is clinical-- he needs supervised care.
Posted by: NK | May 15, 2012 at 12:59 PM
William Howard Taft oversaw the entry of Arizona into the Union.
President Barack Obama, through the innovative use of arms sales to Mexican cartels, is circumventing the laws of both the US and Mexico to help bring death and destruction to both nations. His Attorney General has been able to use his stupidity and gile to outfox investigators in the US Commission on Civil Rights and the US House of Representatives in order to keep this illegal activity from seeing the light of day, and thus secure his Black manhood.
Posted by: Neo | May 15, 2012 at 01:06 PM
It's not just him, NK. He's surrounded himself with juveniles who stroke his [redacted] and deepen his narcissism.
Posted by: lyle | May 15, 2012 at 01:11 PM
Lyle-- sure, he's clinical and surrounded by enablers. What could possibly go wrong?
Posted by: NK | May 15, 2012 at 01:13 PM
Obama probably doesn't know his staff did this...he's upstairs watching ESPN in his flip-flops & sweatpants.
The groupies are puttin' on the concert. :(
Posted by: Janet | May 15, 2012 at 01:17 PM
Oh, Janet, I think he knew.
Posted by: sailor | May 15, 2012 at 01:19 PM
I agree with sailor. 'Bam gave the order to vandalize the POTUS bios. In his demented mind he thinks it's perfectfully natural for the Once to be in the bios.
Posted by: NK | May 15, 2012 at 01:31 PM
it turns out Obama has added bullet points bragging about his own accomplishments to the biographical sketches of every single U.S. president since Calvin Coolidge
Obama thinks he owns whitehouse.gov - that it's his site. Watch him try to take it after he gets his butt thrown out of the real thing.
(Actually what they'll probably do is give The Office of the President Elect the wrong passwords.)
Posted by: Extraneus | May 15, 2012 at 01:43 PM
Obama shows more every day that he is a child.
Posted by: Buford Gooch | May 15, 2012 at 01:45 PM
A letter from James O'Keefe:
After our investigation in Washington, D.C., the office of the Attorney General of the United States accused Project Veritas of "manufacturing" voter fraud when we showed how easily ballots were offered in the District of Columbia -- even the ballot of Eric Holder himself.
I admit when I heard the word "manufactured" it struck a nerve.
With our small team and the support of our donors, we sought to expose not just how fraud happens, but to take the investigation to the extreme by stating the names of voters who also identified themselves as non-citizens.
Last Tuesday, we did just that in North Carolina.
With the power of transparency in our hands through public information, we cross-checked the voter roles with forms where individuals had declined jury duty for being non-citizens.
It appears as if at least one individual either perjured themselves on the Durham County Jury Excusal Form or is not a U.S. Citizen who is registered to vote.
Our attempts to verify their citizenship directly with the individuals were met with obfuscation and hostility so we left it up to state officials to investigate – only to be told that "voting is a public policing open process" by the Deputy Director of the Wake County Board of Elections
Our North Carolina investigation has been taxing and one of our most intensive investigations this year – and the work speaks for itself.
As you will see, our top investigators, dressed in outrageous costumes, speaking a foreign language, covered in bandages and . . . yes, being offered ballots each and every time for individuals who declared themselves non-citizens.
This was a long and expensive investigation that exposed both fraud and the hypocrisy of those who repeatedly state that no voter fraud exists.
You'll see an election judge say that he will "mostly support" the Constitution and then go on to state, "We need somebody to run over Scalia first."
Then you'll see for yourself the hypocrisy of a state-funded school, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill where we have NUMEROUS administrators embrace our investigator who appears to be behind "Operation Chaos" to commit mass voter fraud within the state.
To top it all off, we have a director of the "new ACORN", Coalition to Protect Families, compare voter fraud to "speeding" and advising with a wink and a nod, "There's even less enforcement of these laws than there are of those."
Our staff was up all night finishing this video and the reaction just within the first few hours has been tremendous.
Just minutes ago, commentator and political icon Michelle Malkin gave us a generous donation and tweeted, "I just donated to Project Veritas to support America's best election integrity watchdogs. Have you?"
I'm extremely grateful for Mrs. Malkin's support and yours. If you can, after your watch our video, please make a donation on that same page. Click here to get started. [The video is at the link.]
Thanks again for your ongoing support. With the support of our generous donors, Project Veritas has already made an incredible impact this year.
Help us continue the fight.
Yours for Truth,
James O'Keefe
Posted by: Extraneus | May 15, 2012 at 01:52 PM
NK:
'Bam gave the order to vandalize the POTUS bios.
Well, I want to see the transcript of those conversations.
...as written by Jim Ryan
Posted by: hit and run | May 15, 2012 at 01:53 PM
(Actually what they'll probably do is give The Office of the President Elect the wrong passwords.)
If that's the worst thing that happens when the JEF is booted we'll be very ahead of how I think things will play out. El JEFe won't take rejection well; he's already been scarred by his deadbeat parents doing so and belongs in therapy from that rather than in the White House.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 15, 2012 at 01:54 PM
My theory is that a lot of those who got rich fairly easily, seem to end up Democrats. You see this with inherited wealth, and with the wealth that comes from instant stardom in Hollywood. And, I think with Big Law lawyers. On the other hand, those who gain wealth, and even great wealth, through long work and maybe turning a small business into a bigger one, tend to be Republican.
And, I think that the reason for this, is that the former group question why they were blessed with their wealth, and others were not. And, the latter know why.
What is humorous is that Wall Street is not Republican. Probably just as many, if not more Democrats there. Nice to portray it as Republican though to their base.Posted by: Bruce | May 15, 2012 at 01:56 PM
Anyone who thinks Wall St. is dominated by Republicans is an imbecile.
Posted by: lyle | May 15, 2012 at 02:01 PM
General George Catlett Marshall, who never penned a memoir (as opposed to the brilliant Barack Obama, who penned two memoir like books before reaching the age of 50), has been referred to as the organizer of victory in World War II. This feat pales when measured against Barack Obama's organization of asbestos removal in Altgeld Gardens, not to mention his relentless focus on organizing male only golfing outings.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 15, 2012 at 02:10 PM
Did you know?
William Howard Taft weighed 334 pounds, and had a bathtub installed in the White House that measured 84x41 inches.
Today, Michelle Obama bathes in the White House.
Posted by: bgates | May 15, 2012 at 02:18 PM
bgates,
LOL.
Posted by: Sue | May 15, 2012 at 02:22 PM
Did you know?
John Kennedy was killed in Texas by a man with a rifle. Today, Barack Obama sends guns from Texas south so they can only be used to kill Mexicans and Americans in Mexico.
Posted by: bgates | May 15, 2012 at 02:23 PM
Did you know?
Thomas Jefferson was a Renaissance Man who wrote one of the most inspirational documents in the history of political science, expanded America's borders dramatically, and contributed to the fields of biology and architecture. Today, Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure who watches sports on tv and once ate a f*cking dog.
Posted by: bgates | May 15, 2012 at 02:26 PM
Bruce, how true.
Posted by: sailor | May 15, 2012 at 02:27 PM
I promise if elected president to put bgates in charge of the WH website.
Thank you.
Posted by: Clarice | May 15, 2012 at 02:58 PM
Tammy Bruce tweets a link to a picture where Obama is inserted into the Last Supper.
Posted by: Sue | May 15, 2012 at 03:10 PM
((Tammy Bruce tweets a link to a picture where Obama is inserted into the Last Supper. ))
can we now expect Biblical enhancements as well, the KBO Version, where Christ mulitplied loaves and fishes, and Obama increased social spending. Where Christ walked on water, and Obama miraculously got bin Laden. Where Christ healed the sick and Obama started Obamacare.
Posted by: Chubby | May 15, 2012 at 03:18 PM
LOL bgates. Mockery. More.
Posted by: MarkO | May 15, 2012 at 03:21 PM
It may just be my orneriness, but O'Reilly Pissed me off again last night in his interview of frank Vandersloot, a Mitt Romney donor who has been targeted by Obama via an enemies list.
Vandersloot, who's business has been harmed by this published enemies list, had 2 very worthwhile questions, but O'Reilly, in typical knee jerk fashion, immediately dismissed Vandersloot's well thought out and well stated questions, and instead provided personalcover for Obama by insinuating Vandersloot was thinking as an irrational conspiracy theorist.
From the tape:
O'REILLY: Some believe -- some believe this is economic terrorism. Not economic, political terrorism. That targeting a businessman like you running an honest business because of your freedom to donate who you want to donate to, but try to ruin you personally and professionally, that's terrorism, political terrorism. Do you see it that way?
VANDERSLOOT: Well, I have these two questions, Bill, to President Obama. Why did you publish a list? Why?
O'REILLY: But he doesn't know anything about it. I'm not making excuses for his people.
VANDERSLOOT: ...his people.
O'REILLY: I don't think he micromanages.
VANDERSLOOT: He surely put the people in charge to make those accusations.
O'REILLY: He's responsible for it, because they did it under his name. So absolutely.
VANDERSLOOT: Ask them: why did you make a list? Of all the things you could be doing..
O'REILLY: They want to hurt you and intimidate others who would give to Romney. That's why.
VANDERSLOOT: Second question is who's supposed to receive the message? Is it only the liberal press that's supposed to go after these folks? Or is it also the agencies that he runs like -- that he's in charge of and who report to him and want to please him? The FDC, the FDA, the USDA?
O'REILLY: Well, I think you might be -- you might be making it more complicated than it is.
Here's the bottom line. They want you to shut up and not give any money. And you're going to give another donation, I understand, to the Romney campaign. But they wanted to intimidate you from giving any money to the campaign and others like you who might be thinking about it. Business people going, "I'm not going to do that, because they'll put my name on the Web and I'll lose customers. So I'm not going to do it."
That's what they -- but that's terrorism. And that's what that is.
VANDERSLOOT: I suppose it is. It never happened -- no president has ever done it before.
O'REILLY: OK. But I want -- I think you should be careful on this. If I do ever get the chance to talk to Barack Obama, I'm going to bring up your case, because you're absolutely right. He should scrub that and take that off, and he shouldn't do that.
But I don't know if he himself -- he himself had ordered to do it, and I think we've got to be careful.
I wish O'Reilly would shut up sometimes and let somebody expand on their points. Watching the exchange you can see that Vandersloot wanted to continue with his line of questioning, but upon being forestalled by O'Reilly's pontificating dismissal of the issue, he gave it up.
So back to the 2 questions
1) Why publish such a list?
2) Who is supposed to receive the Message?
I'd like to have heard more elaboration on questions 1 and 2, and then questions 3 and 4, and with some discussion of the legality of paid staffers on my tax dollars amassing and publishing this list.
Posted by: daddy | May 15, 2012 at 03:24 PM
Stolen from a commenter at Althouse:
"Like Jesus, Obama also sports the middle initial of 'H'."
Posted by: lyle | May 15, 2012 at 03:26 PM
For some reason, I can access Atlhouse's site but not her comments section so I can't give proper attribution. But that is one one the best.
Posted by: lyle | May 15, 2012 at 03:29 PM
All kidding aside -- I know it's hard-- but the Once is a sick man. His narcissism is clinical-- he needs supervised care.
His commencement speech at Barnard, aside from talking about the flaws of the Constitution, I gather was pretty much a campaign speech. I mean, who does that? He's an embarrassment to the office.
Posted by: jimmyk | May 15, 2012 at 03:52 PM
Anyone who thinks Wall St. is dominated by Republicans is an imbecile.
In addition to Dimon being a Democrat, Goldman Sachs is a total Dem stronghold (notwithstanding Hank Paulson). Pretty sure the large institutions that run with their palms open at the first sign of trouble are largely Democrat (surprise, surprise)--Citi, BoA, MS. The Republicans tend to be in the smaller more entrepreneurial places like private equity, junk bonds, hedge funds.
Posted by: jimmyk | May 15, 2012 at 03:56 PM
This is gonna leave a mark …
The first area was Obama’s identity — just who was he?
“Obama was steeped in Islam but knew nothing about Christianity,” Klein says.
Klein asked Wright if he converted Obama from being a Muslim into a Christian.
“He said, I don’t know about that. but I can tell you that I made it easy for him to come to an understanding of who Jesus Christ is and not feel that he was turning his back on his Islamic friends and his Islamic traditions and his understanding of Islam,” Klein says.
After the NY Post story, this ought to get Rev Wright an offer of at least $250,000 to shut up.
Posted by: Neo | May 15, 2012 at 04:10 PM
weekly Standard..
A new poll of Arkansas Democrats shows Barack Obama receiving support from only 45 percent of Democratic primary voters in Arkansas’s Fourth Congressional District, while 38 percent support his underfunded and relatively unknown primary challenger, Tennessee lawyer John Wolfe, Jr. Seventeen percent are undecided in the district poll. In an interview with THE WEEKLY STANDARD, Wolfe said the poll results were “unbelievable” and said a defeat for Obama in the Arkansas primary would be “politically cataclysmic.” “It says the momentum is good,” Wolfe said about the poll. “This is democracy in action."
Posted by: Clarice | May 15, 2012 at 04:13 PM
Thanks for including that daddy, even though I'm maxed out on examples of BOR being a clueless boob and borderline retard.
O/T The Flaming Feathered Skull strikes again: http://minx.cc/?post=329294
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 15, 2012 at 04:23 PM
I share the contempt for BOR, but to give credit where credit is due, at least he had Vandersloot on his show, and the basic elements of the story probably got out to a lot of people who hadn't heard it. I don't expect to see Vandersloot on GMA or Today, or anywhere in the NFM.
Posted by: jimmyk | May 15, 2012 at 04:31 PM
Yes jimmyk; I'll concede that. He also has Tammy Bruce (who probably shares our opinion of his cognitive ability) on sporadically so despite his personal illiteracy he does provide a forum which others don't.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 15, 2012 at 04:36 PM
CH, you missed the best part:
Marisa De Franco has just entered the Dem primary against Warren.
Posted by: Clarice | May 15, 2012 at 04:39 PM
O'REilly is too busy, listening to the voices in his own head, so it's more refreshing when he has either Tammy or Laura on, as substitute hosts, since they know something about the subject. That aspect of the parody, Colbert captured accurately,
Posted by: narciso | May 15, 2012 at 04:49 PM
William Howard Taft weighed 334 pounds, and had a bathtub installed in the White House that measured 84x41 inches.
And yet they still won't invite Oprah. Amazing.
Posted by: Jane | May 15, 2012 at 04:53 PM
O'Reilly is a circus Geek. His ego is nearly as big as Obama's. The question and answer portion of O'Reilly, with a guest, is always O'Reilly right, guest wrong. O'Reilly snidely cuts off the guest, in this case a business man who is successful.
The moment O'Reilly had his life and financial future interrupted or threatened by Obama, his pants get shat.
This shit is dead serious. If Obama does not approve, he would not hire scum like Axelrod. Obama knows EXACTLY what is going on. Futhermore, he is responsible for his henchmens' actions.
Posted by: Gus | May 15, 2012 at 04:54 PM
DeFranco still in Dem primary? hmmmm... well I guess I would relish Lizzie losing to an unfunded Dem in the primary. The problem is what if the Dems close ranks and DeFranco wins in Nov? I assume DeFranco is a standard issue Mass Lefty?
Posted by: NK | May 15, 2012 at 05:58 PM
She's an immigration lawyer NK and Jim Rhoads speak highly of her parents. That's all I know.
Posted by: Jane | May 15, 2012 at 06:55 PM
Probably, but she's a more viable candidate,
vs. Brown,
Posted by: narciso | May 15, 2012 at 07:01 PM
I think it's probably too late narciso. People seem to like Brown. I don't know if he will win but I don't expect an alternative surge at this point.
Posted by: Jane | May 15, 2012 at 07:54 PM
Brown can only benefit as an incumbent when the donks reveal their utter disorganization by bringing in a ringer at this late date. What an embarrassment; I don't even think Duke and Duke could outdo that although I'd hate to test that hypothesis.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 15, 2012 at 09:13 PM