Yet another dismal jobs report renews calls for Fed action.
But is this animated .gif actually Ben Bernanke in action or David Axelrod redeploying Obama's ad budget?
Nonfarm payrolls grew by a seasonally adjusted 96,000 in August, well below estimates and down from 141,000 jobs in July.
[Adding to the sense of weakness, the Labor Department’s payroll count for June and July was revised lower by a cumulative 41,000. Payrolls rose by a revised 45,000 in June and by 141,000 in July.]
The payrolls growth came in weaker than the 125,000 increase expected by economists surveyed by MarketWatch. See comprehensive MarketWatch economic calendar with consensus forecasts.
The nation’s unemployment rate fell to a seasonally adjusted 8.1%, down from 8.3% in July, according to a separate survey of households.
Economists had been expecting the jobless rate to hold steady at 8.3%.
The decline wasn’t particularly good news, however, because it reflected 368,000 people dropping out of the labor force. While unemployment dropped by 250,000 to 12.5 million for August, employment also fell, dipping 119,000 to 142.1 million. Read full government report.
"Spanky" Bernanke. I love it.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | September 07, 2012 at 10:58 AM
Well, not entirely Off Topic. Paul Bedard:
CHARLOTTE, N.C. - As buoyant Democratic
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 07, 2012 at 11:13 AM
Thanks, TM!
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 07, 2012 at 11:15 AM
Jane-
Lucianne has up a pic of Queen Elizabeth's Chair Effort.
Too funny.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 07, 2012 at 11:23 AM
TM/MelR-- did you read the link to "Call" for fed action? The 2 concluding graphs? and who wrote it? It concludes that QE3 won't do anything (except raise gas and food prices further) and the solution is fiscal action (to me that means repeal Obamacare, cut spending and reform the tax Code)-- but DO QE3 anyway, even though QE2 and twist were failures, and QE3 will fail as well. Huh? Written by Rex Nutting, REX NUTTING? that sounds like an 80s porn actor name-- not that I know anything about those things. We're supposed to follow financial advice from Rex Nutting?
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 11:26 AM
The ECB action in buying debt from insolvent economics is akin to buying a return ticket on the Titanic. Banks are supposed to make sure they stay solvent for their depositors and shareholders.
The Spanish case is especially tough. The demand for bailout funds is growing much faster than anticipated, and in addition to the banks, the regional governments are now pulling the fire alarm.
Draghi, by saying they're buying program is unlimited, is simply building another story on the house of cards. And still, the various governments to whom he is accountable, have not given their blessings.
That can being kicked down the road is looking more battered than Rodney King.
Posted by: matt | September 07, 2012 at 11:35 AM
Absent manipulating of the numbers (which I wouldn't put past this Administration), the only way the employment picture improves is if businesses start hiring.
And other than businesses in the bag for Obama (i.e., GE, Goldman, Solyndra (oops, they're not hiring), etc.), what business owner is going to decide anytime over the next two months that the thing they need to do more than anything is to go out and add employees?
Even if there was an opportunity to hire, why wouldn't businesses wait until after (hopefully, knock on wood) Obama loses? Heck, given the stakes, I could imagine some employers (temporarily) cutting back on staffing in hopes of doing their little bit to make the job numbers look that much worse for Obama.
Think of this as the business version of Just Desserts... Obama has spent the past three plus years trashing business and demonizing the successful. And now these very same people hold his future in their hands.
Payback can be a b***h, huh?
Posted by: steve | September 07, 2012 at 11:43 AM
Matt-- what are "sterilized" gov't bonds purchased by ECB?
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 11:44 AM
Rex = "King".
King Nutting = Blanc Mange
QED
Matt-
With the Spanish bank run in full flow, there are not enough bonds available, that aren't already pledged as ECB collateral, for the ECB to buy.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 07, 2012 at 11:48 AM
Made my day.
Posted by: Voldemort WILL BE defeated ! Sandy Daze | September 07, 2012 at 11:52 AM
Seriously about Eastwood-- he IS Hollywood now. His films are not only artistically and technically superb, HE MAKES MONEY. For over 100 years, nothing in Hollywood is revered as much as making money. Oh the Hollywood Lefties hate Clint now for attacking Bam, but watch, there will be limited and polite criticism directed at Clint from the Hollywood nutters. He's that important now-- even at 82. Amazing.
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 12:05 PM
Unexpectedly my car wouldn't start this morning. This the first it has failed to start since 2008. That is what "unexpected" means not when it fails to start at least once a week for over 400 weeks.,
Posted by: Jack is Back (At the Dealer for Service) | September 07, 2012 at 12:07 PM
Watching CF13 at dealer. Just heard they are subpeona GZ school records. Also something about his social media activities. It's all on the CF13 News website. I am on my iPhone.
Posted by: Jack is Back (At the Dealer for Service) | September 07, 2012 at 12:13 PM
These are supposed to be absolutely, positively, to be paid back before all other bonds.I believe they are short duration as well.
Problem is that economies don't collapse uniformly. The number of variables involved; all of the Greek economy; all of the Spanish economy; most of Italy, Portugal, etc. would seem to indicate that there is a risk multiplier that is being ignored; whistling past the graveyard from what I see.
The Euro banks are the ones holding most of the bad debt right now, and the balance sheet games have to be insanely deceptive for them to look stable. These are the people who will transact the bonds because of the ECB backstop.
What I am seeing is the various governments stepping in to clean up individual messes like the French mortgage bank that just went BK. The whole issue of municipal debt in countries such as France seems to be being ignored for the time being.
A massive slump brought on by one starts a domino effect of reduced economic activity which further causes the economies to decline and then reduces tax revenue and other forms of government income.
Right now there is low demand even in China and the BRIC's. So there is no economic engine driving global growth except a sputtering U.S. economy.
In crises, perception is reality and I think the ECB is banking on this. I hope they're right.
Posted by: matt | September 07, 2012 at 12:16 PM
Matt/MelR-- so 'sterilized' is simply ECB priority, correct?
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 12:23 PM
96,000 jobs were created in August. Take every person represented by those jobs -- and if you packed them in tightly -- you could have fit them in Bank of America Stadium last night. Literally. Obama wasn't using it.
368,000 people dropped out of the labor force. Obama would have to deliver last night's speech roughly 25 times in order for each of those people to get to see it live in Time Warner Cable Arena.
Posted by: hit and run | September 07, 2012 at 12:29 PM
re: Draghi's pronouncements. The Euro leaders keep making them, they keep on being empty, and they have a diminishing half-life in soothing the markets.
The proposals are fisked here. A snip on "subordination" given below.
http://brucekrasting.com/on-marios-shock-and-awe/
"As part of any bailout, Mario has insisted that the IMF will be brought in. Let me be very clear on this. The IMF is always Senior to pubic holders of debt. This means that the IMF will be Senior to the ECB as to the right of repayment. ...
There is a reason that governments and the IMF have always been treated as senior to other creditors. These types of lenders are not in it for the return, they are forced into lending as a result of a crisis. Tax payer money is at risk when cross-border bailout loans are made. Those types of creditors should have protection over commercial lenders who made a mistake. That has been the tradition in all sovereign bailouts over the past 100 years."
Posted by: Jim,MtnViewCA,USA | September 07, 2012 at 12:29 PM
"Sterilized" means buy one bond and sell another. You get price action without the pesky monetization feature.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 07, 2012 at 12:40 PM
re: sterilization
I don't know what this means either and would like to (if someone knows).
Here is what Bruce Krasting has to say, clearly it is related to minimizing inflation from money-printing.
(pronouncement)
E) In a brilliant move, Draghi placated those old curmudgeons at the Bundesbank who have expressed concern on the inflationary front. Any bond purchases that the ECB makes, will be immediately sterilized. This single step eliminates the possibility of any inflationary consequences.
(fisk)
E – I wait to see if the promise to sterilize all purchases of debt is delivered on. If this is done in small amounts (under E 200Bn), I think that it could be done in a sterilized manner. But there is little chance that it can be done in the Trillions of Euros that will be required. To live up to the promise of “unlimited”, Draghi will have to print money. To think there are no inflationary consequences attached to the Draghi plan is just wishful thinking, or outright lies.
Posted by: Jim,MtnViewCA,USA | September 07, 2012 at 12:42 PM
thanks, Mel.
Posted by: Jim,MtnViewCA,USA | September 07, 2012 at 12:43 PM
MelR-- thanks.
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 12:45 PM
Breitbart:
"Several high-profile former supporters of President Barack Obama in 2008 announced on Thursday they have now switched to Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan.
"The group launched a petition online on the day Obama addressed the Democratic National Convention, hammering home the point that Obama let down many Democrats and independents who believed in his rhetoric of hope and change in 2008.
"Former NBA and UNLV Runnin' Rebel basketball player Greg Anthony and former Democratic Congressman Artur Davis join Ashley Bell, Hall County Commissioner, Jane Edmonds, former Massachusetts Secretary of Workforce Development, and Barney Bishop, Former Executive Director of the Florida Democratic Party, on the national leadership team. "
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 07, 2012 at 12:45 PM
MelR-- per JimMtnView's point, are there unlimited bonds to 'sterilize' without printing Euros, i.e monetizing the bond purchases.
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 12:46 PM
hit:
"96,000 jobs were created in August. Take every person represented by those jobs -- and if you packed them in tightly -- you could have fit them in Bank of America Stadium last night. Literally."
Send that to Team Romney by instant messenger! Or send it to Instapundit -- anything to get it into immediate circulation. That's Prez Goldman Sachs quality material.
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 07, 2012 at 01:01 PM
Yes, it is, JMH. That's out hit.........
Posted by: Clarice | September 07, 2012 at 01:17 PM
Questions for the econ and demographic boffins:
* Are new retirees factored in to the calculation of the number of people leaving the labor force? There were 76 million Boomers born during the two decades after the war, which averages out to about 316,000 a month.
* How do they calculate the number of young people entering the work force for the first time? If the criterion is simply turning 18, that's about 375k/mo; presumably the number of young people entering and leaving college roughly balances out so there would still be that number who could potentially enter the work force. But what about kids who get out of high school or college and just move back in with their parents? Are they ever counted as entering or leaving the work force?
Posted by: bgates | September 07, 2012 at 01:19 PM
Why were the August numbers seasonally adjusted? Or more appropriately phrased, why were the August numbers in 2012 seasonally adjusted when the August 2011 numbers weren't? What was the "not seasonally adjusted number" for August 2012. I'll anxiously await the answers from the AP, CNN, etc.
Posted by: dave | September 07, 2012 at 01:20 PM
NK-
No. Currently the known bond pool is finite and largely encumbered, meaning they have been pledged as collateral to either the Bundesbank or the ECB for their cash float.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 07, 2012 at 01:21 PM
MelR@1:21-- OK no surprise there; so what is Draghi talking about? is it just BS to delay the day of default reconning and the collapse of European banks holding the crap sovereign debt?
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 01:23 PM
All the above are published, every first Friday of the month, at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Today's release was nearly 40 pages. You can look it up.
No mysteries. It's all there.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 07, 2012 at 01:26 PM
'Seasonal adjustments'?-- the Birth-Death model assumed 87,000 jobs were created that BLS can't prove. In August 2011 the Birth-Death model assumed 52,000, and in later reports that was revised down a few thousand. So will this August 2012 assumption be reduced by 35,000+? probably. The Household Survey of actual people found 119,000 FEWER people working than in July and 368,000 fewer workers. They are people like DD who have gone on Soc Sec Disability welfare. It's a jobs disaster.
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 01:29 PM
NK- Think Augean Stables.
bgates- That's the CES Birth/Death model you are looking for. Sort of like the English on the ball that is Non-Farm Payrolls number.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 07, 2012 at 01:31 PM
arghhh reconning= reckoning
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 01:33 PM
"96,000 jobs were created in August. Take every person represented by those jobs -- and if you packed them in tightly -- you could have fit them in Bank of America Stadium last night. Literally."
I agree with JMH and Clarice. Start with Instapundit. I'm going to shorten it for Twitter.
Posted by: Jane - Get off the couch your country needs you! | September 07, 2012 at 01:35 PM
NK-
B/D model doesn't work that way. It's more like stretching the ruler.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 07, 2012 at 01:35 PM
NK
"reconning" = good description for Obama campaign tactics and rhetoric
Posted by: Barbara | September 07, 2012 at 01:36 PM
I just want to call attention to this great comment by Ignatz from last night:
I hope someone from Romney's debate prep team is reading here, because that line about not being an "heir to the presidency" is golden, and easily followed up with such other heavy ordnance as "He's your employee [looking into the camera]" whose "contract has expired" and "I'm respectfully applying for the position." Etc.You know Obama won't be able to resist using the word "inherited" during the debates. Hopefully his strategists aren't reading here.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 07, 2012 at 01:37 PM
MelR-- Ok, but if I remember my greek mythology, there were magical rivers that bailed out Hercules and cleaned out the stables in a day, and augeas refused to make good on the bet and was killed by Hercules. So who is Draghi/Banks? Hercules or augeas?
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 01:38 PM
Since there wasn't a specific JEF speech thread, here's the Tammy Mystery Science Theater 3000 broadcast: http://tammybruce.com/category/public-podcast
Also, per Dennis Miller, Peggy Noonan is not responding to his invitations to appear on his radio show. Either the prospect of staying sober after noon or dealing with higher cognitive abilities than ScarredBurro or Meeka was, in the words of Ted Kennedy, a bridge too far.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 07, 2012 at 01:38 PM
Hercules=market
Augeas=Draghi/EU
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 07, 2012 at 01:41 PM
CaptH-- so are we to assume, you are not a peggy n fan?
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 01:41 PM
He was hired by the moron majority to fix the mess that everyone knew existed in Nov 2008 and that he himself promised to fix.
It's not just that he was hired. He begged for the job. And now that it turns out it was too hard for him, it's something that was dumpted on him.
Posted by: Ranger | September 07, 2012 at 01:42 PM
From Cripes Suzette:
"Now here’s a question for Democrat women only:When a DNC-approved and pre-screened speaker stood in front of the convention and said: there are three simple reasons for anyone to support Barack Obama: “Your sister, your mother, and your daughter”, didn’t you find it insulting or even slightly odd that he didn’t include “YOU”.
Hello? Didn’t any of you get just a little shiver when you recognized that the party call only goes out to the men?"
Posted by: Clarice | September 07, 2012 at 01:42 PM
MelR@1:41-- thought so-- OHPAH!!!
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 01:43 PM
"Are they ever counted as entering or leaving the work force?"
Yes. The labor force is comprised of all those employed or seeking employment. If young RainbowUnicorn has moved back to mom's basement and is looking for work, he's in the labor force. If he's spending his days cruisin' in the Choomwagon, he's not.
You have to add green card entrants to the 375K per month. LPR's were issued at the rate of 85K per month in 2011 so 460K is closer to the mark for entrants. Then you deduct persons leaving the labor force due to discouragement, retirement, disability or death to get the net number.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | September 07, 2012 at 01:49 PM
NK, she squandered her credibility four years ago to a transparent fraud that should've sent every sensory detector of a grifter on full alert. But she loves appearing on the unchallenging Morning Joke show which doesn't threaten her delusions of being prescient.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 07, 2012 at 01:49 PM
BTW the number of people who became unemployed in August (119,000) could not fit in Bank of America stadium, even if they put seats on the floor.
Posted by: Jane - Get off the couch your country needs you! | September 07, 2012 at 01:49 PM
MelR@1:41-- and this EuroModel of social welfare state, high taxes, crony 'banking', high sovereigndebt that results in economic stagnation and debt collapse, this is the model which morons like Bam, Biden, Sperling and Krugman and the whole Academic Economist world (except whats his name at Harvard) demand we follow. Is it too much to ask that they all be discredited by this economic fiasco.
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 01:50 PM
CaptH-- does she also enjoy a good 1100am Stoli Martini, DOUBLE, neat, 3 olives?
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 01:52 PM
We're going to Hell in an empty handbasket.
========================
Posted by: Empty this, empty that; just believe, no back chat. | September 07, 2012 at 01:58 PM
--Then you deduct persons leaving the labor force due to discouragement, retirement, disability or death....--
Do we also deduct those leaving for food stamps, medicaid, AFDC, 99 weeks of unemployment, and so on?
How about those leaving for SSDI?
Posted by: Ignatz | September 07, 2012 at 01:59 PM
"does she also enjoy a good 1100am Stoli Martini, DOUBLE, neat, 3 olives?"
If so, she and I might get on famously.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 07, 2012 at 02:02 PM
"Is it too much to ask that they all be discredited by this economic fiasco."
Possibly. Revel explored the fact French dirigisme showed hardly a hiccup after the fall of the perfectly planned state of the Soviet Union. I'm not at all sure of what will be required to kill Auguste Comte's zombie. While razing l'École Polytechnique and the Ivy League is certainly worth a try, I'm afraid we're going to have first see how the Great OPM Famine ends. If we're lucky, today's oligarchs will find a new Pericles to herd them to safety behind Athen's walls.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | September 07, 2012 at 02:09 PM
RickB-- but what if the new Pericles is Austrian born and has a funny little moustache? or a Corsican midget?
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 02:12 PM
"If so, she and I might get on famously."
Of course, but would you slosh your way through a televised interview in that state?
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 02:14 PM
F word twitter alert...
"Liberals cuss out Archbishop Timothy Cardinal Dolan"
http://twitchy.com/2012/09/07/liberals-cuss-out-archbishop-timothy-cardinal-dolan/
Posted by: Luca | September 07, 2012 at 02:16 PM
I noticed something really interesting last night. I was sort of stunned by Biden's reaction when he came out on stage - he was pretty much overtaken by the idolatry. He was totally caught up in all the screaming and clapping. He was obviously enjoying it immensely.
(How would you feel if that was you?)
And then I realized that Romney doesn't like the idolatry. In fact I think it makes him feel awkward -which is why people complain that he is unapproachable. Now I do think he has gotten better at it since Ryan joined the ticket - I saw that in Manchester. But still who would guess a lack of narcissism would be such a detriment.
Posted by: Jane - Get off the couch your country needs you! | September 07, 2012 at 02:25 PM
"96,000 jobs were created in August."
That's not even 2,000 for each of our fifty states. But we're not to get all wee-wee-ed up over it.
Posted by: Frau Pinkelstein | September 07, 2012 at 02:26 PM
...staying sober after noon...
Speaking of sober, I'd like to know what Jennifer Granholm was drinking/ingesting, because I'd like to stay away from it.
Posted by: Frau Heute blau und morgen blau | September 07, 2012 at 02:29 PM
--That's not even 2,000 for each of our fifty states.--
Fifty?
You must count in Austrian, Frau.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 07, 2012 at 02:30 PM
To answer bgates's 1st question: there's no demographic adjustment, so some of the labor force decline uis due to boomers retiring. But only some. I did a rough calc awhile back that suggested that was less than half the decline.
Posted by: jimmyk | September 07, 2012 at 02:30 PM
OT: Google has a fun doodle today. You can make a Red Shirt nervous and have Kirk defeat the Gorn. Sulu is yellow. Racist! He also seems to be very interested in crewman Red Shirt. Oh, my.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | September 07, 2012 at 02:35 PM
Speaking of sober, I'd like to know what Jennifer Granholm was drinking/ingesting, because I'd like to stay away from it.
Somebody @ AoS said that she looked like Julie from the Love Boat; I'm thinking that was Slick's fantasy payoff for that stem-winder he delivered. Another of my fellow morons had this comment: She came off like a drunk secretary on Friday night, heading straight to "Scandals" where she stumbles around on one broken heel, hair all fucked up.
If she didn't wake up in a puddle of her own vomit with a rubber hanging out of her ass this morning, I'd be surprised.
Also the big talk on Detroit stations concentrated that she had her facial mole removed.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 07, 2012 at 02:36 PM
JimmyK-- it's pretty clear at this point that the BLS reports of vastly reduced labor participation are not just retirees, they are heavily influenced by Disability claims and discouraged workers not seeking any employment -- OR, BLS is BSing to keep the unemployment rate % down (personally, I doubt they are BSing).
Posted by: NK | September 07, 2012 at 02:36 PM
"some of the labor force decline uis due to boomers retiring"
Including those who "retire" when they lose their job at age 59 and there's no point in looking for another.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 07, 2012 at 02:38 PM
If young RainbowUnicorn has moved back to mom's basement and is looking for work, he's in the labor force. If he's spending his days cruisin' in the Choomwagon, he's not.
How does the BLS know what little RU is doing?
And I doubt they keep track of the IPR (illegal permanent residents), but is there a net outflow there?
Posted by: bgates | September 07, 2012 at 02:41 PM
Just a little summary from studying Rove's map. I posted something to this effect in the comments to Stanley Kurtz's post on the Corner (linked a thread or two ago).
Here are the swing state 30-day public poll averages:
IN - Romney + 16 - Obama won it by 1 point in 2008
IA - tied - Obama won it by 9 points
NC - tied - Obama won it by 1 point (actually .3%)
CO - Obama +1 - Obama won it by 9 points
OH - Obama +2 - Obama won it by 5 points
FL - Obama +2 - Obama won it by 3 points
VA - Obama + 2 - Obama won it by 6 points
NV - Obama + 3 - Obama won it by 12 points
WI - Obama +3 - Obama won by 13 points
MI - Obama + 3 - Obama won it by 16 points
NH - Obama + 4 - Obama won it by 9 points
These states in addition to the McCain states equal 317 electoral votes.
IN, NC, OH, FL, VA plus one other state on that list = Romney victory.
Team Obama is sweating bullets.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 07, 2012 at 02:49 PM
From the other thread, rse noted the Kurtz piece on NRO ("are Republicans fooling themselves?"). It dovetails nicely with Byron York's piece (LUN):
The situation facing Romney is hard for some Republicans to comprehend. They didn't buy Obama's bill of goods in the first place and find it hard to sympathize with anyone who did. But there are millions of people who voted for Obama who are not only disappointed in him but have come to the conclusion that he does not deserve to be re-elected. The problem for Romney is they might still be persuaded to vote for the president. Making them comfortable with the idea of leaving Obama is Romney's job.
and...
The important thing for Romney, aides believe, is not to rub the voters' noses in their decision from four years ago. Don't bash Obama, don't even harp on how he's not up to the job -- that carries the implication that they should have known that when they voted for him. Just focus on the point that his policies have not made things better.
How can we square that viewpoint - which is, sadly, probably correct - with what Kurtz says (Zero's agenda is far-reaching and transformational, and the Dems have bought into it 1,000%, and if we want to have any hope of surviving as a free society, it needs to be repudiated utterly)?
Posted by: James D. | September 07, 2012 at 02:58 PM
Porch, Raz has RR up 2 in Ohio now, and a very recent NC poll had them up 4 there.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 07, 2012 at 03:04 PM
Heh. Very colorful, Captain.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 07, 2012 at 03:09 PM
Iggy - heh
Porch - please keep us informed of your father's prognostications.
Posted by: Frau Heute blau und morgen blau | September 07, 2012 at 03:15 PM
Thanks DoT. The figures posted are the poll averages from Rove's map. So the OH number might inch up soon for Romney.
Frau, I will. Will send him those numbers and see what he says.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 07, 2012 at 03:32 PM
I think Romney needs to do what is necessary to win. Once in office, he can repudiate the Obama legacy by dismantling it in detail.
Obama gets a 2-point bounce in the Gallup head-to-head, 48-45.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 07, 2012 at 03:36 PM
That's pretty much where I am, DoT. First, get the guy out of there. Then we can talk about fixing it.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 07, 2012 at 03:44 PM
Plus most people think of "transformational" as a good thing.
Posted by: Jane - It's gonna be a Tsunami in November | September 07, 2012 at 03:50 PM
Rot is transformational. Flame is transformational.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | September 07, 2012 at 03:50 PM
"Being in a better place" is transformational. Poor image with that one, Barry.
Franz Kafka's character Gregor experienced transformation, too.
Posted by: Frau Verwandlung | September 07, 2012 at 03:57 PM
Attending Pitzer College, on the other hand, is crippling.
Posted by: Frau Verwandlung | September 07, 2012 at 03:59 PM
The judge did not curtail the Democrats' right to vote *after* election day in order to win.
Posted by: Frau Verwandlung | September 07, 2012 at 04:06 PM
Don't bash Obama, don't even harp on how he's not up to the job -- that carries the implication that they should have known that when they voted for him.
Yes, Romney should concentrate on getting the same 47% of the electorate the Republicans got in 2008, rather than suggesting any Obama voters change their minds.
This is one of those bits of Republican Establishment Conventional Wisdom that has no corollary for Democrats, or anybody else who wants to win anything. Obama managed a successful incumbent-bashing campaign directed against a guy who wasn't even running again. We still joke about the phrase "blame Bush" because even now - three and a half years since he left office, eight years after he last ran for office - it's a pervasive idea. Not to say it's a persuasive idea, anymore, but it worked pretty well in 06 and 08.
But sure, let's try things like these fucking spineless nameless dickless aides want to.
"There's a well-educated man, a great father, and a true patriot running for President. In fact, he's already President. Unfortunately, through no fault of his own, some of his policies aren't working perfectly. Maybe the other guy might be a little better? Or not. Whatever you decide is fine. I'm Mitt Romney, and I'll approve this message if it's ok with the very popular President of the United States, Barack Obama."
Posted by: bgates | September 07, 2012 at 04:09 PM
There's no way Mormon Mitt is losing Nevada.
Posted by: someone | September 07, 2012 at 04:11 PM
Yep, bgates. Isn't this a time for the naked truth to be spoken. We're broke. We're out of money. We cannot keep doing this.
Bernie Madoff was sent to the slammer for being a hoax. How much did he borrow from the
Chineseclients?Posted by: Frau Neinsagerin | September 07, 2012 at 04:17 PM
"Mitt Romney spent the day on the defensive after running an ad that offered no compliments toward the President besides his education, fine family, patriotism, and popularity. 'In no way did I mean to suggest or imply that the four traits I mentioned were the only good things about our thoroughly honorable, admirable, and virtuous President. Unfortunately, the constraints of the tv ad - coupled, I will admit, with a desire to mention my own attempt to replace this internationally beloved figure - made it impossible for me to list everything about this man that I try to emulate in my own life.'"
Posted by: bgates | September 07, 2012 at 04:18 PM
Yes, Romney should concentrate on getting the same 47% of the electorate the Republicans got in 2008, rather than suggesting any Obama voters change their minds.
I don't think that's what it means. I think it means he would try to change their minds in a less confronational manner - "We gave him a shot, but Obama couldn't do the job, time to try someone else."
Not "Obama's evil and you're stupid for having voted for him."
That's an exaggeration to make a point, of course.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 07, 2012 at 04:28 PM
someone:
"There's no way Mormon Mitt is losing Nevada."
On the one hand, the Mormon population in Nevada is not as big as a lot of people assume it is, and on the other you've got Harry Reid's corruptocrats and a powerful union presence. Don't count on Nevada being an easy get.
Posted by: JM Hanes | September 07, 2012 at 04:31 PM
OT, but if you enjoy the original Star Trek, go to Google's home page. Their (multi-part, with sound) doodle today is wonderful.
Posted by: DrJ | September 07, 2012 at 04:49 PM
p.s. in case it wasn't clear in my 4:28, I do actually believe that Obama is evil and that people are stupid for having voted for him. I just don't know if telling them so is the best way for Team Romney or anyone else to go about changing minds.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 07, 2012 at 04:50 PM
At this point it seems to me we've got a good portion of our hopes invested in the notion that the polls are all using flawed turnout models. I am waiting for some of them to start converting to likely voter models with realistic turnout assumptions.when do you suppose that might occur? Early October?
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 07, 2012 at 04:55 PM
We're broke. We're out of money
That will come out as soon as Romney is inaugurated.
Posted by: Jane - It's gonna be a Tsunami in November | September 07, 2012 at 05:04 PM
DrJ - our sons and their German cousins watched faithfully and called it *lovingly* Star Dreck.
Posted by: Frau Neinsagerin | September 07, 2012 at 05:04 PM
Frau, I called it the same. Still, I've seen each episode many, many times. That helps with some of narciso's references!
Posted by: DrJ | September 07, 2012 at 05:07 PM
We gave him a shot, but Obama couldn't do the job
"through no fault of his own". The dickless aides would want to be sure to include the phrase "through no fault of his own".
I'd rather use Obama's failure to take down the press. You, voter, you didn't know Obama was going to make all of these terrible decisions. Why weren't you told? Look at this week's NYT story about how much time he spends on sports and games - why wasn't this story published four years ago? Why weren't a lot of stories published four years ago?
Bash Obama, harp on the fact that he's not up to the job, assume the American people wouldn't make such a tremendous mistake if they had all the relevant information presented to them, and talk about why it wasn't.
Posted by: bgates | September 07, 2012 at 05:09 PM
After what Obama did to the tourism business in Nevada, why would anyone in Clark County vote for him?
People need to be reminded of some of the very stupid and/or nasty stuff the man has said, and what he has done to various communities.
I haven't heard the Catholic Church lately and after that pro-abortion love fest I would think the Bishops have every right to condemn the Cuoma - Kennedy - Pelosi - Fluke - Biden apostates. Don't forget the whole First Amendment insult as well.
Or the masses of bitter clingers somewhere between Pittsburgh and Philly.
Or the GM & Chrysler pensions and dealership employees who got screwed.
In these kinds of close races, the politics of the personal is critical to gaining an edge.
Mitt doesn't have to stoop. He has surrogates to do so. Plaster stickers with the price of gas on 11-5-08 and 11-5-12 on gas pumps.
Remind the lefties of how Obama has failed them. There's plenty of disappointment and disillusion to go around.
And then there's health care, the economy, and all of the other issues. It is a target rich environment as the pilots would say.
Posted by: matt | September 07, 2012 at 05:10 PM
For Frau,
Here's my dad's response:
Posted by: Porchlight | September 07, 2012 at 05:11 PM
Bash Obama, harp on the fact that he's not up to the job, assume the American people wouldn't make such a tremendous mistake if they had all the relevant information presented to them, and talk about why it wasn't.
Amen, amen, & amen!
Posted by: Janet | September 07, 2012 at 05:11 PM
One way of getting it across to voters without making them think poorly of themselves for their decision in 2008 is to emphasize the reality of what the Belmont Challenge and the Future Earth Alliance will mean. That Building One America is a real agenda for the 2nd term and that we may all see the era of busing as being over but we are 1 vote on SCOTUS away from it being back.
The reality of SEL as the primary focus in education and the ways they intend to close the achievement gap. The actual template for higher ed and how the nature of college is to be radically changed even further so that the product of the SEL focused K-12 is still college ready.
Describe specific policies that are so troubling and that are easy to frame in ways that make their personal effects inescapable.
Posted by: rse | September 07, 2012 at 05:12 PM
"through no fault of his own". The dickless aides would want to be sure to include the phrase "through no fault of his own".
bgates,
Wow, that sucks. I apologize - I didn't realize that was part of the messaage. That is very, very weak.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 07, 2012 at 05:12 PM
I see absolutely no reason for Romney not to go after him hammer and tong, and smite him hip and thigh. Hell, millions of people already feel stupid for voting for this mountebank; it's not Romney's job to persuade them otherwise. What unadulterated crap.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 07, 2012 at 05:19 PM
Could we please at least give Romney some credit for having a brain, very good people, and a campaign that has been about as close to flawless as any campaign. Not perfect, but pretty darn good.
The lie that Romney is pulling ads or not running ads in states like WI, MI, or PA is a lie generated by the left.
Today is the first day of an ad roll out. The first day Romney is finally able to dip into his huge warchest. They are starting with 15 ads, the majority of which are targeted to specific states in their message to those voters. And now that the dems have wrapped up, Romney is back out on the trail with an appearance in Iowa today and a big rally in NH later today.
The ads are available to watch. If you can't find them linked, you can always go to the Romney YouTube channel and watch. The Romney campaign is already addressing many of the things I see talked about here as things he should do, even though he is already doing it.
No one is asking anyone to like/love this candidate, but acting as if his campaign is as incompetent or even less competent than McCain's is not only unfair but wrong.
Posted by: Sara | September 07, 2012 at 05:39 PM
Porch, that's just my reading of the York piece that James quoted - in fact, the rest of the article is worse:
Maybe I just don't understand stupid people, but telling people Obama was the right choice in 08, and he'll continue to be the same guy in a second term, and therefore he should be replaced with someone else doesn't strike me as a winning argument.
I think the argument should be hey, soccer mom, if you hired a babysitter based on rave reviews from a neighbor or somebody at work and then came home from date night to find the babysitter had somehow overdrawn six trillion dollars from your bank account and convinced your family doctor to quit medicine, you hired a bad babysitter. That's a mistake! In fact that's one of two mistakes, both correctable: You hired a bad babysitter, so never hire her again, and you listened to bad advice, so seek advice elsewhere.
Posted by: bgates | September 07, 2012 at 05:40 PM