Peering back through the mists of time, I noticed this Obama 2007 contribution to the national laugh track. Try to imagine that Obama once believed this, and try to hope that he no longer does. The context is an interview with the National Journal in which he makes the case for his own Presidency:
Let's start with his wisdom on foreign policy:
I also believe that I can be a more effective agent of change [than Hillary] in the diplomatic sphere in repairing the damage that's been done by George Bush, partly because I haven't fallen in to some of the conventional thinking that Senator Clinton did, which led her to authorize the war in Iraq and to at least give George Bush the benefit of the doubt when it came to his approach on Iran.
Q: But you also mentioned you might change the image of the United States in the world in the talk that you gave tonight.
Obama: Well, and I believe that's true. I think that the day I'm inaugurated, the world will look at America differently. America will look at itself differently. And that's more than just symbolic, that is political capital that can be used to make America safer, and to restore its standing in the world.
And The Once provided some insight on fiscal stewardship:
You know, Senator Clinton says that she's concerned about Social Security but is not willing to say how she would solve the Social Security crisis, then I think voters aren't going to feel real confident that this is a priority for her. And that's the kind of leadership I think that the Democratic Party has to offer in the years to come.
Yeah, Obama has been leading on entitlement reform, all right. Leading over a cliff.
Mark Steyn: Disgrace in Benghazi
Posted by: DebinNC | September 15, 2012 at 08:57 AM
He's just not that smart.
Posted by: MarkO | September 15, 2012 at 09:04 AM
His head must whistle in high winds.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 15, 2012 at 09:06 AM
The fact that he was elected and that he holds the support of nearly 50% of the voters is an indictment of the electorate. It means more than we are willing to admit.
Posted by: MarkO | September 15, 2012 at 09:18 AM
Doug Ross has a theory he fleshes out at his blog that Obama has shifted from supporting Saudi Arabia and opposing Iran to supporting Iran and opposing the Saudis. He has reasonable evidence for that and , remember, Iran is where ValJar was raised.
And Bob Owens , after removing the questionable polls from RC,P predicts a blowout for Romney.
Look on my mom jeans, ye Mighty, and despair! Not an undecided vote remains
http://www.bob-owens.com/2012/09/look-on...
He built that: This projection suggests a Romney blowout of Obama in November. Three years of general malaise and a disastrous late summer and fall have set up the conditions for a perfect storm to sweep Barack Obama out of the White House in a humiliating loss
Posted by: Clarice | September 15, 2012 at 09:21 AM
The Boston Globe tells you what RAS has been telling you, the momentum is with Republicans:
Some states dont have partisan registration so they could not make comparisons there.
My own personal observation of the Democrat Party booth at the Parker Co Peach Festival, was the Maytag repairman's office.
Posted by: GMax | September 15, 2012 at 09:22 AM
So are you saying that he was wrong in opposing the Iraq war? The war was a disaster but it had clearly become a disaster by the time he spoke out against it. In fact by the time he was elected to the senate in 2004 the war already lost.
Having said all of that, that doesnt make him bad. He is bad for horrible socialist policies at home.
Posted by: Mike | September 15, 2012 at 09:22 AM
Mike-
You lost me at "opposing the Iraq war". So your finish was sort of muddled.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 15, 2012 at 09:26 AM
--Peering back through the mists of time, I noticed this Obama 2007 contribution to the national laugh track.--
Barry Soetero=comedy gold!
Posted by: Ignatz's laff trac | September 15, 2012 at 09:26 AM
He also believed he had a composite dad, that changed too:
http://youtu.be/XZ60yx_yH3c
Posted by: Threadkiller | September 15, 2012 at 09:28 AM
"It means more than we are willing to admit."
I'm not sure about that. We have an electorate which has been indoctrinated to the point where the EPA's classification of air as a pollutant in order to tax it has been accepted and promoted by both parties. An electorate willing to allow a wholly regressive tax on air to be imposed in order to fund prog Fantasyland says more to me than the AA elevation of a totally incompetent buffoon to the office of President. We've had incompetent buffoons as President before but we've never taxed air.
I would note we're not alone in the air tax idiocy. It appears to be the logical culmination of 130 years of the progressive scientism which has brought the world to a state of bankruptcy.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | September 15, 2012 at 09:29 AM
So are you saying that he was wrong in opposing the Iraq war?
That garden has already been tilled. Move on.
Posted by: sbw | September 15, 2012 at 09:30 AM
--So are you saying that he was wrong in opposing the Iraq war?--
Out of that post that is the inference you drew?
Having said that, that doesn't make you slow. You're slow for missing the point of the post.
Posted by: Ignatz's laff trac | September 15, 2012 at 09:31 AM
In a thread gone by, someone despaired how to graciously respond to a lib gushing talking points but not thinking. How about this:
Question: "What would it take to give you reason to vote against Obama?"
Posted by: sbw | September 15, 2012 at 09:39 AM
"Exactly how bad and off the tracks would it have to get for you to see that we need some real change this go around?"
Posted by: GMax | September 15, 2012 at 09:42 AM
It's a complicated calculus, like Daddy's formula on the other thread, he is in favor of more radical regimes, like Morsy, as opposed to the Sauds, but not their Ikwan retainers. One can look at the Libyan incursion, as clearing the deck for an opponent of the latter, as that piece about the Ambassador Aujali indicatess, one suggests the impetus behind this particular operation, is possibly based in Doha, which is the home of Quradawi, Sheik Rahman's co issuers of Jihad.
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 09:43 AM
I don't understand why so many voters don't see or don't care that Obama is a malignant narcissist, since he provides daily proof. For example, at his post-Benghazi State Dept photo-op, BOzo assured the bereaved that he valued them because he spent time abroad as a kid. In Obama's little mind it's always about him...always.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 15, 2012 at 09:43 AM
On the 50%, don't underestimate just how much damage the Clinton education initiatives known then as outcomes based education did to minds that are in their late teens and 20s now. Hillary thought she could mine that but bo and Ayers had created monsters with her initiatives she was apparently unaware of.
http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com/develop-learners-who-think-and-behave-and-view-themselves-as-systems-citizens/ is my new post and it lays out the quote on how it takes 12 to 16 years to get the desired mindsets.
Like the media as we have been discussing all week it is time to discuss whether we have educators acting as Fifth Columnists and do they have immunity with those magic credentials?
I mention Milton Rokeach. His charming 1968 book called "Beliefs Attitudes and Values" even had an Appendix on how useful this info on attitude and value change will be for advertisers.
What are the chances this is part of what Axelrod knows and used in 2008?
Posted by: rse | September 15, 2012 at 09:44 AM
Minus 13 at Raz today.
Trails Romney by 2.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 15, 2012 at 09:46 AM
The war was neither a disaster nor did we lose it.
The disaster was after the war attempting to impose a western style government on a barbarous 'nation' with ethnic, religious and political divisions thousands of years old all of which groups are motivated by and captive of a malignant theo-political ideology incompatible with our aims.
Until we remember that it is perfectly acceptable and usually preferable to wage war in order to destroy our enemies so that afterward they will fear and respect us, rather than as an opportunity to afterward establish another gigantic Big Brother/Big Sister program for out troops to carry out on people who think bombs are a fashion accessory we will continue to win the war and the lose the peace.
Of course the current genius believes neither. In Barry-world you undermine those who have kept their boot pressed to your enemy's throat so that your enemy obtains power and then you sit back in wide eyed wonder that your enemy is still your enemy except that now he owns tanks, planes and reactors.
This is known as the 'lose the war and the peace' strategy. Historically it is not particularly common for obvious reasons and has a zero percent success rate.
Posted by: Ignatz's laff trac | September 15, 2012 at 09:49 AM
Headline at Drudge - FEDS INVESTIGATE CHRISTIAN FILMMAKER
What a disgrace. It doesn't matter who the guy is or what his background is...we have FREE SPEECH in this country!! This administration & our press should be standing up for FREE SPEECH.
Posted by: Janet | September 15, 2012 at 09:51 AM
On the 50%, don't underestimate just how much damage the Clinton education initiatives known then as outcomes based education did to minds that are in their late teens and 20s now. Hillary thought she could mine that but bo and Ayers had created monsters with her initiatives she was apparently unaware of.
Can we finally put the "Hillary is really smart" meme to rest? She's at best a pedestrian thinker who tried to ram health care down the throats of an unwilling electorate, which led to the Repubs gaining control of Congress for the first time I could remember (until those subgeniuses eventually squandered everything). Other than that she enables a sexual predator who uses her as a doormat and has helped ruin our image in the world by completely botching her time as SoS under the JEF.
Anybody got a ledger balancer for those?
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 15, 2012 at 09:53 AM
Clarice,
I actually would not be surprised if Obama's allegiance has morphed from SA to Iran. I would actually be more surprised if Obama was aware that his allegiance has changed, as I doubt his masters have told him yet.
I wonder how far they have thought that through.
Posted by: Jane - It's gonna be a Tsunami in November | September 15, 2012 at 09:55 AM
Well, no, Janet, because they believe in 'positive rights' and those like freedom of speech, don't do anything for people, except when they serve an indoctrination function, as rse has pointed out.
Btw, our local fishwrap, rse, had a dismissive column about Agenda 21, of course it engaged in no actual facts, just derision,
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 09:57 AM
LAT has an incredible pic of offensive to Islam "film" guy freely presenting himself for questioning, not arrested, we're told, despite the phalanx of deputies helping him into the police car. The WH must have enlisted the aid of Mayor "the ayes have it" to get that incredible pic surely designed for worldwide distribution.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 15, 2012 at 09:58 AM
http://freebeacon.com/the-world-obama-made/
"Column: The sun never sets on Obama’s failures"
Meanwhile, there are still Americans who claim they are going to vote for him.
Unbelievable!
Posted by: pagar | September 15, 2012 at 10:00 AM
As of December 2011, the War in Iraq was won.
Everything after that is another matter entirely.
~~
Rick Ballard, Good morning.
Fed's Lacker: Bond-Buying Likely to Increase Inflation
You think? It was Mr Lacker who marked the loss of productivity a couple months ago, wasn't it? Is he an outlier among the Fed leadership?
Posted by: Sandy Daze | September 15, 2012 at 10:02 AM
What really scares me about the American electorate is, if you believe the NYTimes/CBS poll just out, Obama has moved ahead of Romney on the economy. This after the horrid, horrid jobs numbers just last week. If this is really true (and the poll like most recently oversamples Democrats) then the populace is just too ignorant for common sense to allow Romney to win.
Posted by: bio mom | September 15, 2012 at 10:03 AM
In Obama's little mind it's always about him...always.
The inability of his handlers to make him stop doing that probably means that he won't. Is there anybody that doesn't treat him like a dim and petulant child?
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 15, 2012 at 10:05 AM
freely presenting himself for questioning, not arrested, we're told, despite the phalanx of deputies helping him into the police car.
Great point, Deb. Will the feds go after Billy Graham next? or any other Christian organizations that say Islam isn't true? They probably offend Muslims too.
Posted by: Janet | September 15, 2012 at 10:08 AM
I wonder what inflation would already be if food and energy weren't removed from the formula by the BLS.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 15, 2012 at 10:09 AM
Volodya treats him, like what hereminds him off, the international student at Patrice Lumumba university, yes biomom, that is the Democratic milieu, that we are dealing witgh
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 10:12 AM
Bio mom-
A NYT/CBS Intra-office poll influences me little.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | September 15, 2012 at 10:13 AM
"It means more than we are willing to admit."
Not me. I think I'm fully aware of what the rent-seekers and parasites want, and it's what they have now. And they are something very close to half the population.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 15, 2012 at 10:13 AM
Obama:
I think that the day I'm inaugurated, the world will look at America differently.
I don't know if it happened on the day he was inaugurated, but the world certainly looks at America differently now.
Posted by: hit and run | September 15, 2012 at 10:14 AM
Obama has been after the First Amendment from day one when, unlike anyone before him, he attempted to chill the speech of a critical network.
Only fools believe that the riots are about a movie. Particularly one first on the Internet in July. I think Obama understands that most people will believe most anything.
Romney is right in announcing up front that the debates will be simply more lies from Obama. He is a liar, you know.
Posted by: MarkO | September 15, 2012 at 10:16 AM
It is somewhat heartening to me that in a Ras poll of American adults, 51 percent think it is likely that the Libyan government was involved in the murder of our personnel, and 30 percent think it is unlikely. Now, on the question of who planned and carried out this attack, I have no idea what the mix is among those inside the Lib government and those outside of it, and which of the various jihadist groups and their supporters in Middle Eastern governments were involved. However, I think it clearly was not protestors responding to a YouTube video that caused these murders. Despite the fog of MSM, over half of American adults appear to have enough info to recognize that the film meme is false.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | September 15, 2012 at 10:18 AM
And Noonan, she's really exhibiting the logorithm we spoke earlier about.
Patterico, is being understably more sympathetic to Jan Crawford, because of her earlier work, but I don't give her a pass,
if she had actually made a point, that emphasized her own misgivings about Cairo.
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 10:19 AM
Rupert must have sent a team to find and destroy the picture of him going into an orphanage with Sandusky because Drunk Before Noonan clearly views her future as being on Morning Joke as another "conservative voice".
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 15, 2012 at 10:22 AM
Better of course that 92 percent of American adults would have concluded that Jarrett's Mideast policy was a substantial contributing factor to the murders, but I'll take what I can get.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | September 15, 2012 at 10:23 AM
Well,that's reassuring, TC, 'shirle, Carney could not have been serious' yesterday, As with Afghanistan, the mix of insurgent elements, lean more Salafi, with Qatar, probably replacing the Sauds, at least in the short term, but you need a scorecard to keep track of all the players
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 10:24 AM
Hussain Huqquani, wasn't he the ambassador tossed out last spring, because he was too critical of the ISI, had a very good piece in the Journal yesterday.
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM
Sandy,
I don't follow Fedspeak at all. They may well wish to see inflation roar a bit in order to sustain the illusion that their econometric models have any relation to reality.
Controller Chiang provides a much cleaner view of the actual state of the economy than the scientistic gibberish backed by charts produced by the Fed. Skip the cheer leading on the first page of Chiang's report about revenue exceeding lowered forecasts and note the year over year 25% drop in sales tax revenue. California is still about 15% of the national GDP and that drop represents something slightly worse than what the word 'recession' entails.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | September 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM
TC:
Thank God most people see this fraudulent tale about the videotape for the pap that it is and has become.
Arresting the guy responsible gives the WH momentary breathing room but that will not last. How to explain the wave of protestors throughout the globe? They hate America and what we stand for and know our current prez will do nothing to stop them because his roots are their roots. It's embedded in his DNA. It's the reason he must go. Despite what Chris Matthews proclaims, He is not like us and does not share our American traditions.His values are counter-intutive to those we hold most dear.
Posted by: maryrose | September 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM
From Federalist #10 by James Madison:
By republican, Madison means "republic," not a popular democracy as Democrats have tried to create and control.
-- A rage for paper money: In progress
-- an abolition of debts: In progress
-- an equal division of property: In progress
-- or for any other improper or wicked project: In progress
If ever there were an indictment of American schooling it is the omission of reading why our founders built the Constitution the way they did. Our schooling leaves us unprepared to recognize and defend against those who would bring our government down.
Posted by: sbw | September 15, 2012 at 10:33 AM
Mr. Maguire, I think you are being very unfair to our President. He hasn't had time to handle entitlement reform. Look at his killer schedule. LUN.
Posted by: peter | September 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM
When you've lost Kirsten Powers...
"In fact, what is 'disgusting and reprehensible' is that there are people in the world who think they are justified in attacking and killing people because someone hurt their feelings or offended their sensibilities. The US government should not act as a validator or enabler of this upside down worldview, which is exactly what the Obama administration has done repeatedly as they have responded to these abhorrent attacks against the United States.
"I have defended the Obama administration against the complaints from the right that they have run an 'apology tour' in the Middle East because I believe the US should admit when we make mistakes, such as the accidental burning of Korans. But what we shouldn't do is affirm the wrongheaded view that people should be protected from the free speech of others."
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 15, 2012 at 10:37 AM
narciso- I ran into ICLEI this week as a featured aspect and I was not looking. And the ATL Regional Commission has as its featured speaker for its annual October breakfast the Brookings fellow who held the first regionalism conference in 1998. The one that became a book in 2000 that VP Al wrote the foreword for. The book that noted that Gamaliel was on the cutting edge of charitable foundations pushing this philosophy.
So no it's alive and well and being dismissive of it while so much is going on in its name does indicate a certain don't look here. Probably from Kurtz's book which would have been stronger if it had built on that angle. Since I already knew it his book was really helpful for me. It would be hard though to build actionable knowledge from it unless you came in as an expert on Bioregionalism or Ed or CRT or some other crucial element.
Broward popped up in something I read. I think its super in 90s was an early true believer county wide social engineering sort. To this day the Floridians do not seem to get NAEP is a huge values and attitudes survey on top of higher order, emotional, thinking. And different groups take different parts and it only tests a small fraction of 4th and 8th. Very easy to game. My son's class came in and pulled all the Algebra in 7th students who had done well in Duke TIP search and used that to reflect school. Right.
Posted by: rse | September 15, 2012 at 10:40 AM
YARDSALEFOROBAMA.COM. This is not a joke – they want Obots to sell off their possessions and send the money to O.
Impoverish yourself for the state... oy.
Posted by: Stephanie | September 15, 2012 at 10:43 AM
Obama has been after the First Amendment from day one when, unlike anyone before him, he attempted to chill the speech of a critical network.
and the whole [email protected] to turn in citizens that were putting out critical info on Obamacare.
Posted by: Janet | September 15, 2012 at 10:44 AM
The local sup, is from Chicago, I don't know if he is a gypsy, as such, of coure to a one teachers blame the Brothers, and we're not talking the Marists, but Jeb and W, for their circumstances.
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM
I agree with DoT.
Posted by: sailor | September 15, 2012 at 10:47 AM
@10:13.
Posted by: sailor | September 15, 2012 at 10:49 AM
Anne Barnhardt has rethrown the gauntlet.
LUN
Posted by: Stephanie | September 15, 2012 at 10:50 AM
I wonder what ol' Cat Stevens thinks of the blasphemous video? Maybe Jon Stewart & Colbert could check with their musical guest from Restoring Sanity to see if Cat is for or against FREE SPEECH.
Peace Train & all that, ya know.
Posted by: Janet | September 15, 2012 at 10:50 AM
Raz:
"The latest Rasmussen Reports statewide telephone survey of Likely Voters in Ohio shows Brown with 49% of the vote to Mandel’s 41%. Three percent (3%) prefer some other candidate, and seven percent (7%) are undecided."
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 15, 2012 at 10:52 AM
If he is from the Windy City he is a Gypsy. Transferring from North Central jurisdiction to becoming an enforcer in a SACS jurisdiction. Easy to do because same Atl based holding company owns both. No one is getting these major district jobs unless they are committed to Dewey's Reconstructionist vision for education.
SBW-thanks for that Madison quote. I brought him back in today's and had a U Va history prof write me to praise it when I first wrote it.
The Constitution is just something these clowns think they can override by fiat. Just control the flow of information. At its source through schools and colleges and through the media to influence the adults who got away.
Posted by: rse | September 15, 2012 at 10:55 AM
How deep is the WaPo rot?
Obama refuses to meet with Bibi, schedules Letterman appearance instead.
Does photo op with caskets then skips another intel briefing to go to Vegas fundraiser, and WaPo readers learn none of that. Instead, here's the front page article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/romneys-appear-on-daytime-tv/2012/09/14/01d56dda-fe86-11e1-a31e-804fccb658f9_story.html?hpid=z4
Posted by: Clarice | September 15, 2012 at 10:56 AM
JEF is definitely on board with the ISlamists to ban blasphemy against the Prophet worlwide. Our lefty friends really haven't thought through the danger of JEF's alien anti-american world view. He demands that Congress has the power to force individuals to buy a product (how about a law requiring all able bodied adults to buy a 9mm semiauto pistol?) he rejects the 1st amendment right of expression -- especially political expression -- when he doesn't like the content. When Bam is bounced in Nov we will have done a favor to our lefty friends, his anti-americanism is as big a threat to them as it is to us.
Posted by: NK | September 15, 2012 at 10:56 AM
Here's what I don't get.
That's what the media calls likeable. Likeable? That's likeable? Sheesh.
Posted by: Tom Bowler | September 15, 2012 at 10:56 AM
Stephanie...your link goes to Ruth Marcos.
I love Ann Barnhardt!!! I'll look for the link.
Posted by: Janet | September 15, 2012 at 11:00 AM
TomB-- likeable? Perhaps. Insufferable &@?&head? Absolutely!
Posted by: NK | September 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM
Here it is. I'm your flippin' huckleberry.
Posted by: Janet | September 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM
Sorry. forgot to refresh the url...
Hang on.
http://www.barnhardt.biz/
and lun
Posted by: Stephanie | September 15, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Stephanie,
Could you re-check the link at LUN?
Posted by: Barbara | September 15, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Well he's a Harvard and NorthWestern trained businessman, Rse, before joining the Chicago school system, but as you point out, that doesn't forestall the viral coding
embedding in the system.
The fiswrap is trumpeting an AP poll, illustrating the Vizzini like ignorance of constitutional principles, like free speech.
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM
We should do for blasphemy what we did for the empty chair.
Posted by: MarkO | September 15, 2012 at 11:08 AM
Zombie is up to something:
How Can I Participate?
There’s nothing to join, nothing to sign, no rules to follow, no guidelines to abide by. To become a truthagandist (at least for the next seven weeks), just keep repeating over and over in your mind:
Change the Narrative.
Turn it up to 11.
My filter trumps their filter.
Do not self-censor.
Do not play defense, or even offense: just spike the ball, over and over.
Aim to convince strangers, not entertain friends.
This is not a drill.
LUN
Posted by: Stephanie | September 15, 2012 at 11:10 AM
Nothing like backstabber John Weaver, captain of the HMS Huntsman, to prove that you're over the target.
AQAP apprently approves of the Stevens hit, since that's what they were going for, when
when they attacked the embassy in Sanaa, back in 2008, thar was their debut, from the fellow, who is now reliving that scene
from 'Casino Royale' for an eternity
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 11:15 AM
" Obama Is Wrong… Mideast Protests Were Planned Before YouTube Video Ever Made the Airwaves (Video)
The Muslim protests were planned back in August – before the film was ever released. The protest in Cairo was organized by the terror group, Jamaa Islamiya. USA Today reported:
The protest was planned by Salafists well before news circulated of an objectionable video ridiculing Islam’s prophet, Mohammed, said Eric Trager, an expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
The protest outside the U.S. Embassy in Cairo was announced Aug. 30 by Jamaa Islamiya, a State Department-designated terrorist group, to protest the ongoing imprisonment of its spiritual leader, Sheikh Omar abdel Rahman. He is serving a life sentence in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.
When the video started circulating, Nader Bakkar, the spokesman for the Egyptian Salafist Noor party, which holds about 25% of the seats in parliament, called on people to go to the embassy. He also called on non-Islamist soccer hooligans, known as Ultras, to join the protest.
On Monday, the brother of al-Qaeda leader Ayman al Zawahiri, Mohamed al Zawahiri, tweeted that people should go to the embassy and “defend the prophet,” Trager said.
Zawahiri justified al-Qaeda’s 9/11 attacks in an interview with Al Jazeera last month.
The first clip of “Innocence of Muslims” was shown on Al-Nas TV, an Egyptian Islamist television station, on September 8, 2012."
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/09/obama-is-wrong-protests-were-planned-before-youtube-video-was-ever-released-video/
(Hat tip to Observer at Citizen Wells)
Posted by: Threadkiller | September 15, 2012 at 11:19 AM
--YARDSALEFOROBAMA.COM. This is not a joke – they want Obots to sell off their possessions and send the money to O.--
LOL. What next,
SELLYOURORGANS/DENTURESFOROBAMA.CON?
RENTYOURGUESTROOMTOADRIFTERWHOTURNSOUT-TOBEASERIALKILLERFOROBAMA.CON?
Posted by: Ignatz's laff trac | September 15, 2012 at 11:24 AM
“Pay $10 to Touch Scarlet Johansson’s Tits for Obama Day”
h/t Geoffb at PW
Posted by: Stephanie | September 15, 2012 at 11:26 AM
I was referring to Said Al Shihri in that last bit, I don't know who has taken his slot in AQAP, probably Al Rubboush, another
wayward shepherd, released from Gitmo, thanks to the Levick/Seton Hall whitewash
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 11:29 AM
So, Egyptian state TV, set the spark, much like that series on the Chronicles, that they ran about a decade ago.
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 11:31 AM
The JEF and Pinhead Troika must be desperate when they reveal themselves to everybody as transparent grifters with an insatiable appetite for other peoples' money. Rove identified their ridiculous burn rate early on and obviously nothing has changed in that. Not sure what their end game was but it obviously was something unrealistic even with the MFM in the tank for them.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 15, 2012 at 11:33 AM
"Johansson was born in New York City on November 22, 1984. [1] Her father, Karsten Johansson, is a Danish-born architect originally from Copenhagen"
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scarlett_Johansson#section_1
Natural born tits?
Posted by: Threadkiller | September 15, 2012 at 11:35 AM
Thinking outside the OBox...
Any of y'all living in a blue hell should have a yard sale for Obama. Ask exorbitant prices and let your lefty neighbors buy that stuff (it's for the good of the country- surely you want to give your fair share - Bill C got $3 bucks for used undies from Goodwill). Then buy yourself a gun with the proceeds to protect yourself from these fools.
Posted by: Stephanie | September 15, 2012 at 11:35 AM
We're still underfire, from Clinton's oily countenance over here, if feels like 2008, in terms of the constant rotation of lies
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 11:41 AM
https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/228797_10151150722378886_595874987_n.jpg
Posted by: Clarice | September 15, 2012 at 11:41 AM
I am still mulling over the way to best deal with the bias sure to be shown in the debates.
Should we divide up the moderators and issues and research examples of their bias and publish that ahead of time?
Posted by: Clarice | September 15, 2012 at 11:45 AM
Yes, yes, Clarice!
Posted by: sailor | September 15, 2012 at 11:47 AM
Steven Hayward at Powerline:
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM
Well Crowley had 'the Ryan could be a deathwish', Raddatz, out of a group of 60 Iraq Vets, could find no one sympathetic to McCain, that's just off the top of my head.
Posted by: narciso | September 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM
The film maker who is being hounded by investigators, is also a $1 million donor to Obama.
Circles within circles.
Posted by: centralcal | September 15, 2012 at 11:57 AM
Let's do it systematically . Who are the moderators/ for which debate/topics of those debates?
Then have people sign up to do the research on each of them.
Posted by: Clarice | September 15, 2012 at 11:59 AM
Jim Lehrer - Oct 3rd
Bob Schieffer - Oct 22nd
Candy Crowley - Oct 16
Martha Raddatz (VP debate) Oct 11
Posted by: centralcal | September 15, 2012 at 12:02 PM
DoT, It's now fairly obvious Stevens was gay and some are suggesting that he was sodomized before and after he was killed because of that.
I do not know if he was. He was missing for a long time and no stories about the timing of the attack and his death are consistent or complete.
OTOH I think whether he was or not such reports have less to do with his sexual activity and more to do with humiliating him in arab eyes.
Posted by: Clarice | September 15, 2012 at 12:02 PM
Here are the official debate schedules with list of topics to be covered.
Posted by: centralcal | September 15, 2012 at 12:03 PM
Lehrer - up first - subject: domestic policy
Raddatz - next - VP - subject: foreign and domestic
Crowley - third - Townhall - subject: foreign and domestic (citizen questions)
Schieffer - last - foreign policy
Posted by: centralcal | September 15, 2012 at 12:07 PM
Here are the official moderators:
Presidential debate No. 1 (domestic policy):
Jim Lehrer, Executive Editor of the PBS NewsHour
Wednesday, Oct. 3, University of Denver, Denver, Colo.
Vice presidential debate:
Martha Raddatz, Senior Foreign Affairs Correspondent, ABC News
Thursday, Oct. 11, Centre College, Danville, Ky.
Presidential debate No. 2 (town-meeting style):
Candy Crowley, Chief Political Correspondent, CNN and Anchor, CNN’s State of the Union
Tuesday, Oct. 16, Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y.
Presidential debate No. 3 (foreign policy):
Bob Schieffer, Chief Washington Correspondent, CBS News and Moderator, Face the Nation
Monday, Oct. 22, Lynn University, Boca Raton, Fla.
For more on the moderators, check out their official bios:
here are their official bios
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/presidential-debate-moderators-announced-crowley-is-first-woman-in-20-years/2012/08/13/0e327af6-e553-11e1-8f62-58260e3940a0_blog.html
we need Lehrer on domestic policy Romney/Obama
raddatz on Biden/Ryan foreign policy
Crowley Romney/Obama
Schieffer foreign policy Romney. Obama
Interestingly, the Demedia obviously though Obama's strong suit was foreign policy when they set this schedule.
Posted by: Clarice | September 15, 2012 at 12:08 PM
You're way ahead of me on that, Clarice. Haven't seen anything about his being gay, but I did see an unsubstantiated report that he was sodomized.
Just tried to watch the trailer for "Innicence of Muslims," and I couldn't come close to getting through it. Unwatchable. I've seen better film on my teeth.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | September 15, 2012 at 12:12 PM
Clarice | September 15, 2012 at 10:56 AM
Breitbart was right, media is our true enemy
we need more like him and Drudge
Drudge gets more visits per day than WaPO gets in a month.
we are winning
Posted by: windansea | September 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM
Yard sale ideas:
Posted by: Threadkiller | September 15, 2012 at 12:17 PM
The film maker who is being hounded by investigators, is also a $1 million donor to Obama.
Circles within circles.
Posted by: centralcal | September 15, 2012 at 11:57 AM
he is also a fed informer
Nakoula, 55, was arrested in June 2009 for his role in a check-kiting ring that stole nearly $800,000 from six financial institutions by using stolen Social Security numbers and identities. Nakoula was named in a six-count felony indictment accusing him and unnamed “co-schemers” of perpetrating the bank fraud.
Denied bail, Nakoula, a married father of three, was locked up at the Metropolitan Detention Center in L.A. when he began cooperating with Justice Department lawyers and federal agents. During a series of debriefing sessions, Nakoula provided investigators with a detailed account of the fraud operation and fingered the man who allegedly headed the operation, according to comments made by his lawyer at sentencing...
http://directorblue.blogspot.mx/2012/09/ruh-roh-producer-of-anti-islam-film-was.html
Posted by: windansea | September 15, 2012 at 12:17 PM
--Natural born tits?
Posted by: Threadkiller | September 15, 2012 at 11:35 AM--
Suspect we'd need her medical records to answer that.
What I'm wondering is does each ta ta have divided loyalties or is one all in for America while the other is a great Dane?
Posted by: Ignatz's laff trac | September 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM
Local LA CBS "reporter" live in front of house of anti-muslim "film" guy as he's led away by deputies. He finishes his report by turning and looking directly at house as he provides the helpful-to-jihadis news that although the filmmaker won't be returning to his house following his interrogation, his family still plans to be there, i.e. available for annihilation.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM
Hey, lay off Johansson, I've talked to Murray about her. "They're real- and they're spectacular." Not that there's anything wrong with it.
Posted by: MarkO | September 15, 2012 at 12:22 PM
2008 McCain/Obama debate transcript with Bob Schieffer at the helm.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 15, 2012 at 12:22 PM
Is anyone in LA available to photograph the home of the local CBS reporter who did that?
Posted by: Clarice | September 15, 2012 at 12:23 PM
Time for the Army of Davids, Clarice?
Yes. Incorporate that with the Zombie advice posted above and put it out in well traveled blogs with screaming zonking headlines and make it viral.
Alinsky dialed up to 11.
Posted by: Stephanie | September 15, 2012 at 12:25 PM