In their ongoing effort to persuade the public to quit whinging about higher taxes the Dead Tree NY Times delivers a misleading headline for the record books:
Complaints Aside, Most Face Lower Tax Burden Than In The Reagan 80's
The text goes on to compare the total Federal, state and local tax burden in 1980 with that of 2010, which prompts a question - when did Reagan take office and launch his first round of tax cuts? 1981, yes? Surely the Times editors remember the timing of the Descent of Darkness.
So maybe a better headline would be "Taxes Lower than in the Carter Era", which would deliver a less surprising message and make a less compelling case that we are currently under-taxed.
I infer that the Times editors have realized their problem. Online, the current headline is:
Complaints Aside, Most Face Lower Tax Burden Than in 1980
No kidding - most face a lower burden than in 1980, when everyone felt over-taxed. We can spot the evolution (or is it intelligent design?) of their headline by way of the website URL (my emphasis):
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/30/us/most-americans-face-lower-tax-burden-than-in-the-80s.html
Welcome back, Carter.
ERRATA: The CBO calculates the total Federal tax burden, including imputed corporate taxes. For the three lower quintiles of earners the Reagan years were not so great, tax-wise - the cut in the Federal income tax was roughly offset by the increase in the Social Security tax.
Finding the total Federal, state and local burden back to 1980 has me stumped just now, although this Tax Foundation report reaches back to 1991.
TK, Speaking for myself I'm tired of doing legal work for someone who ignores it.
I've already discussed the originally posted consent decree on protesting election fraud and it does not say what the anti-RNC crowd claims it does.
Further I will not go.
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 03:21 PM
JimmyK@3:19-- BuBu really said that? He really is ignorant... well, Barry I believes the same thing... It's a Lefty Thing.
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2012 at 03:21 PM
That is wonderful bio mom. I miss W too.
Posted by: Jane - Mock the media | November 30, 2012 at 03:24 PM
Iowahawk tweet: "DC is a crack addict who thinks he's subsidizing the liquor store by not robbing it."
Posted by: Spending cuts first!--jimmyk | November 30, 2012 at 03:27 PM
TK, We have an example of a so called independent in the new Senator King from Maine.
Claims he's an independent, but will caucus with the Democrats. Why? Because independents have no power in the Senate or anywhere the political system has been set up in the USA.
Posted by: pagar | November 30, 2012 at 03:42 PM
This is what BuBu said that I was referring to:
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 30, 2012 at 03:43 PM
Ig-
And is precisely why I stopped hugging that tar baby.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | November 30, 2012 at 03:49 PM
The man (or boy) is clearly a complete and profound idiot, Mel.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 30, 2012 at 03:52 PM
Never, ever underestimate the power of human stupidity.-Heinlein
My favorite.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | November 30, 2012 at 03:53 PM
Will Tom McClintock caucus with the Dems if the RNC ceases to exist?
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 30, 2012 at 03:54 PM
The frustrating thing is he's too stupid to ever realize what a knothead he is.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 30, 2012 at 03:57 PM
Here is 59 pages that some find to tiring to read:
http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/rncvdnc.pdf
No need to go further...
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 30, 2012 at 04:01 PM
Good article at AmSpec wondering if Barrycare will suffer the same fate as McCain-Feingold; an initial comprehensive SCOTUS victory followed by enough small defeats to finally kill it.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 30, 2012 at 04:01 PM
GOP House Video:
We've Got Your Back Small Business:
http://commoncts.blogspot.com/2012/11/house-gop-video-weve-got-your-back.html
Posted by: Steve | November 30, 2012 at 04:01 PM
I forgot that bubu extended his idiocy to the private sector, but the context was his claim that government debt isn't the same as taxation because they never have to pay it back. The fact that they have levy taxes to pay for the interest, just as businesses have to generate revenues to pay off debtholders, doesn't seem to register.
Posted by: Spending cuts first!--jimmyk | November 30, 2012 at 04:02 PM
Ig, he's caught in a vicious circle. If he were even a little smart, he wouldn't be so stupid.
Posted by: derwill | November 30, 2012 at 04:03 PM
The frustrating thing is he's too stupid to ever realize what a knothead he is.
This is why all interaction with that dumbass is a mistake.
Posted by: Captain Hate | November 30, 2012 at 04:05 PM
I agree with Pops earlier: The House should just pass a bill that cuts spending and extends the Bush tax cuts, and send it to the Senate. No point in negotiating with these crooks. Their idea of "compromise" is a lot like the Palestinian's idea of compromise with Israel.
Posted by: Spending cuts first!--jimmyk | November 30, 2012 at 04:05 PM
Good article at AmSpec wondering if Barrycare will suffer the same fate as McCain-Feingold; an initial comprehensive SCOTUS victory followed by enough small defeats to finally kill it.
It being linked with McRINO's assault on the first amendment would make me extremely happy.
Posted by: Captain Hate | November 30, 2012 at 04:08 PM
Add me to the approval of Pop's plan.
Posted by: Captain Hate | November 30, 2012 at 04:09 PM
Wait-- BuBu-- all those note satifactions I wrote and recorded as a youngun attorney were.... wrong? Oi! Who knew? BuBu can rest assured that many people here are well aware of the concept of 'rolling over' debt, and strategially using debt for growth. What the Dem Congress and BarryI have done is waaaay past any sane use of debt... it is insane overeveraging that is paying 40% of current operating Fed Gov't costs with long-term debt. No new airports or bridges or even wind farms are bought with the debt, the debt just pays doctor bills for the elderly and poor and buys bread cheese and cigarettes with food stamps. It is a complete abuse of debt and abuse of current and future taxpayers to pay off voters. Madness, complete madness.
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2012 at 04:10 PM
"Speaking for myself I'm tired of doing legal work for someone who ignores it"
Beautiful.
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | November 30, 2012 at 04:10 PM
If I had no other family obligations besides my wife and son, we'd be making plans to move somewhere else ASAP, probably to New Zealand.
fdcol63,
Whittle specifically mentions that urge to split - in fact mentions New Zealand specifically. Basically his answer is "New Zealand is already New Zealand" - we can't make it into a new America, so the same problems obtain (or will obtain eventually).
Anyway, do watch these, and if you enjoy an alcoholic beverage on occasion, pour yourself one first. You will feel better just knowing this guy is out there dedicated to the cause for the duration. He and Breitbart were close friends - they have differing styles, but serve a similar function in many ways. As much as I love and miss Breitbart, I almost have to say I think Whittle may be the more valuable and inspirational of the two in the long term.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 30, 2012 at 04:15 PM
I think some people's eyes are finally opening. Limbaugh had a caller the other day that said he was 45 years old and just realized the only money the government has is what it taxes. He always thought that the government also had its own money to spend. I was not surprised by this although rush seemed to be.
Boehner should either, let the fiscal cliff happen and blame the video, go golfing, or take the whole congress to Hawaii for the holidays.
Posted by: Pops | November 30, 2012 at 04:15 PM
Boehner should tell Obama the only way to not raise taxes on the middle class is to repeal his 300 Billion dollar Obamacare tax on the middle class.
Posted by: Pops | November 30, 2012 at 04:17 PM
Pops,
I think MayBee, longtime commenter here who hasn't dropped by in awhile, said once that there have been multiple polls that indicate that a large number of American adults believe the government has its own money. No wonder we can't win elections.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 30, 2012 at 04:19 PM
Of course Ford Motor Company will pay its debt: each and every bond it issues will be paid in full at maturity. It will of course issue new debt continually, because it makes a great deal of sense financially to do so. But it will never issue nore debt than it can service, or it will go bankrupt.
Similarly with the US government: not just the interest, but at maturity the principal, of each and every instrument must be paid. The question is, at what point will it become impossible for it to do so? No one can say for sure, but there is a broad consensus that once it exceeds 100% of GDP things become precarious.
If this weren't the case, why did the Dems howl so loudly about the Bush deficits (which now seem rather quaint)?
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | November 30, 2012 at 04:20 PM
If this weren't the case, why did the Dems howl so loudly about the Bush deficits (which now seem rather quaint)?
Because it was a hammer to beat him with. They don't actually care about deficits. But your point is still correct.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 30, 2012 at 04:22 PM
My favorite.
For this discussion, that one or TANSTAAFL is most apropos.
If this weren't the case, why did the Dems howl so loudly about the Bush deficits (which now seem rather quaint)?
Well, there's always hypocritical political self-interest.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | November 30, 2012 at 04:24 PM
They don't actually care about deficits.
No, they pretend to care about them when Repubs are in office but only so to provide leverage on raising taxes on the wealthy; never about cutting non-military expenditures.
Posted by: Captain Hate | November 30, 2012 at 04:26 PM
The RNC argued that the hiring of Michael Steele proves they aren't a racist party anymore. The judge was not convinced.
page 31 for those who beleive that Clarice has come close to studying the decree.
Beautiful...
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 30, 2012 at 04:28 PM
Page 30. Sorry.
They also made the case that a black President and Attorney General goes to prove the minorities are not being suppressed. Again the judge did not buy it.
And you wonder why the RNC is the party of racists.
Beautiful...
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 30, 2012 at 04:34 PM
DoT@420-- others here may disagree, but I believe the Fed Gov't and States like Cal, Ill Ct and RI have already past the point of not being able to carry the debt that they've imposed on their citizens. As far as the federal gov't is concerned, the only question is whether BenB can create enough income inflation and dollar devaluation to make the fed debt manageable or the restructuring the USA will cram down the world's throat. That's my opinion-- the mad Obama/Pelosi Dems have ruined us.
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2012 at 04:35 PM
I don't particularly care about deficits either; I care about spending.
If we were taxed sufficiently to fully fund the gigantic diaper dispenser and pail the Federal government now represents it would be at least as harmful to the economy and our long term survival as the current deficits and their implied default by inflation over the next several decades.
I suspect the wealth crushing effects of sky high taxes would not differ substantially from the coming default.
Of course another Warren G Harding would step in and slash spending and taxes and we would grow our way out of the problem in a decade or two but this age seems incapable of even mustering a Harding to help us.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 30, 2012 at 04:38 PM
Porchlight: following up on your MayBee remembrance post above, Rush had a caller yesterday - a convert to conservatism via Beck's book "Broke" who underscores that ignorance:
Caller is 45 and Just Realized Money Isn't Free
I haven't read the linked transcript, but I happened to hear the caller live on air with Rush yesterday while running office errands. He wasn't a stupid guy, just kinda like your everyday person who "assumes" things without really giving any thought at all to those erroneous assumptions. Thought you might enjoy it.
I completely agree with you, too, about Bill Whittle!
Posted by: centralcal | November 30, 2012 at 04:41 PM
Page 13 tells the tale of the opinion given in 2009 against the RNC.
It seems the RNC's First Amendment rights are not violated by the Decree because they are allowed to freely communicate with the State parties on any subject except "ballot security."
Who needs to talk about that at election time?
Beautiful...
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 30, 2012 at 04:43 PM
Of course the US has its own money. It's socked away in that trust fund Algore kept talking about.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | November 30, 2012 at 04:44 PM
Ig-- another Warren G Harding? At this point, we'll be lucky to not get some Bavarian paper hanging fascist claiming he'll pick up the pieces and re-establish national glory by stiffing our creditors. Right now, we are much more like Weimar Germany than 1919 post-war crash USA. That is the simple truth.
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2012 at 04:55 PM
It's socked away in that trust fund Algore kept talking about.
Please try to be more precise when you sling around financial terminology. What Gore was referring to was not in reality a "trust fund." The technical term is "lawkbocks."
Posted by: Free State Paul | November 30, 2012 at 04:56 PM
Right now, we are much more like Weimar Germany than 1919 post-war crash USA.
To quote Saint Ann Barnhardt:
"I'm not afraid of Barack Obama. He's a slack-jawed, mouth-breathing, drug-addled sodomite. What I'm afraid of is the guy who comes after him."
Posted by: Free State Paul | November 30, 2012 at 04:58 PM
Nazi Germany did renounce Weimar debt, which I guess BuBu will claim proves sovereign debt is never paid. Of course, the ultimate consequences of Weimar debt and renunciation was 20 Million Dead 1939-1945. DEBT HAS CONSEQUENCES.
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2012 at 04:58 PM
Didn't the fool call it a lockbox?
Posted by: Danube of Thought on IPad | November 30, 2012 at 05:00 PM
"What I'm afraid of is the guy who comes after him."
It won't be Warren G Harding....
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2012 at 05:01 PM
"I'm not afraid of Barack Obama. He's a slack-jawed, mouth-breathing, drug-addled sodomite. What I'm afraid of is the guy who comes after him."
I probably wouldn't have put it in quite those words, but I agree with the sentiment. When the global collapse comes there will at first be chaos, but at some point a strongman will emerge. If we're lucky it will be no worse than a Pinochet, if we're unlucky it will be a Stalin or a Mao or Hitler. Sadly, I don't hold a lot of hope that we will get a reprise of George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, etc.
Posted by: derwill | November 30, 2012 at 05:08 PM
On New Zealand, because it was colonized relatively late and then remained a colony, its residents always thought in terms of a state directed economy.
It's beautiful. My granddad who went everywhere always said NZ and Lake Louise canada were the 2 prettiest spots on the planet.
It is currently using the presence of the Maori aboriginal culture to gut ed there. The only upside is I get to read the cooky names for things like Transformational OBE I have tracked all over the world.
Marie Clay destroyed reading there about 50 years ago before hitting the road to export her nonsense everywhere.
Posted by: rse | November 30, 2012 at 05:10 PM
Ig, I'm with you on the Am Spec article. I thought it very good.
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 05:13 PM
Does anyone have a reason why the RNC can't get out of a 30 year old Consent Decree with the DNC?
They keep trying, we are told, so what gives?
Maybe the Chargers can get the Bengals to Consent to fewer players on the field Sunday.
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 30, 2012 at 05:14 PM
centralcal, I almost felt sorry for that Rush caller. At least he had the guts to call Rush up and admit his ignorance over the air. I doubt I'd have the courage to do it.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 30, 2012 at 05:17 PM
It's true the federal government has no money of its own but it holds enormous resources--esp. land. And it should consider selling off some of it
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 05:18 PM
Another is that sequence of detainee cases, ending with Boumedienne, which totally ignored the law, subsequent cases argued by the same Levick Grp White shoe attorneys, who could not
be found to challenge Obamacare, like King and
Spaulding, have lost in subsequent cases. like Adahi, and we have begun the process of 'clawing
back the prorogatives, that the former grp had on our national security,
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 05:20 PM
Of course, in the LUN, we learn that 'Sheriff Joe's' assertions, are less certain then that of say Al Bundy,
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 05:25 PM
Hey CH, if you're around, got First I Look at the Purse by the Contours on itunes yesterday. Thanks for reminding me they did it first.
Forgot I used to have it on cassette on a Contours greatest hits.
Was surprised to see that Smokey Robinson wrote it. Don't think I ever knew that.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 30, 2012 at 05:26 PM
Narciso, Al Bundy has better hair as well.
Posted by: henry | November 30, 2012 at 05:31 PM
This should be a fun meeting.
Governors and states are doing more to solve tax, spending and deficit issues than the feds. But when you are deaf to anyone else's voice you will learn nothing.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | November 30, 2012 at 05:33 PM
Speaking of music and spurred by Jim's earlier question that mentioned libertarians anyone sick of PC "artists" should get some Cracker.
"What the World Needs Now is Another Folk Singer Like I need a Hole in my Head" was a good start and they followed up with;
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 30, 2012 at 05:37 PM
Nazi Germany did renounce Weimar debt, which I guess BuBu will claim proves sovereign debt is never paid.
Never? In any case, it's always a question of who pays, not whether someone pays. In the case of Nazi Germany, it was the debtholders who got their wealth confiscated by the non-debtholders. Someone always pays. To put it another way, spending always costs someone.
Posted by: Spending cuts first!--jimmyk | November 30, 2012 at 05:37 PM
You know, we've always speculated at what Sandy Bergler stuffed into his sock that day. What if it was something concerning this?
Posted by: Sue | November 30, 2012 at 05:40 PM
JimmyK@537-- Debt -- SOMEONE always pays. Very true JimmyK, it's an iron law. History is filled with unintended consequences of insane debt. King George V lost the American Colonies in direct consequence of his Seven Years War debt. It's a funny ole world.
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2012 at 05:43 PM
Townhall:
Former ATF Special Agent in Charge of the Phoenix Field Division Bill Newell, former ATF Special Agent in Charge of Operations in the West Bill McMahon and former Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the Phoenix Field Division George Gillett have been fired while former Assistant Special Agent in Charge Jim Needles and Field Supervisor David Voth have been demoted. Hope McAllister, the lead case agent for Fast and Furious, has been put on leave and transferred out of Phoenix according to reports. McMahon and ATF came under heavy fire just a few months ago after it was revealed McMahon had been receiving ATF paid leave while pulling a six figure salary from J.P. Morgan, the same bank that owns the bureau's credit cards.
In addition to involvement in Operation Fast and Furious, the consequences for these officials come as a result of their handling of the Jay Dobyns' arson case. All are expected to receive full retirement
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 05:44 PM
Possibly, although there was a link, through History Commons, of Miniter's findings, that the Sudanese had files that indicated that Mahmoud Salim, one of the 'embassy plotters' back in '98, worshipped at the same mosque as the Hamburg cell, 'that's one Kevin Bacon connection, that would have led to Jarrah annd
Atta, It's instructive that Bowden points out
Ould Slahi, another 'fellow in that neighborhood'
was the first to give indications of Al Kuwaiti,
the Courier.
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 05:48 PM
Been lurking and reading everyone on all the threads about the fiscal cliff, taxes, debt, deficits, the economy, the Rush caller, Bubu and all the other minutae of our lovely conversational life here.
So I will just like to announce that I have now made up my mind and I truly believe it will be best for my son (forget about me and Mrs. JiB) that we drive off the cliff. GOP, please stand back and let the Regime do whatever they want. Its about time the Rush callers of the world, the moochers, poachers, government educated voters, and all the other slaw jawed Wal-mart denizens understand the consequences of elections and ignorance. I'll be okay, but Frederick in 11 to 12 years not so much. Let it go belly up so we can pick it back up and make it right again.
Its the only answer to a failed America.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | November 30, 2012 at 05:54 PM
I flew from NYC to Paris on the same TWA Flight 800 the day after it was shot down. Not the same airplane, obviously, and they'd changed the flight number, but it was the same flight. I was supposed to fly business class, but they upgraded me to first class because there was probably no more than a dozen of us passengers in the entire 747. The eye witness reports that it had been brought down by a missile hadn't leaked out around the WH and press embargo yet, so I suffered only a fleeting nervousness--lightening not striking in the same place twice and all that.
Posted by: derwill | November 30, 2012 at 05:55 PM
Sue-- you brought up TWA800 once before. I personally reject almost every 'consiracy theory', but the official story of TWA800 has never did sit well with me. For instance... FAA was very casual about 747 fixes after the 'official story' and the airlines and Boeing didn't seem very concerned about liability. Strange... no?
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2012 at 05:55 PM
That'll be a good 40 years in the debt wilderness, JiB.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff on Kindle | November 30, 2012 at 05:57 PM
Sadly, so, jiB, Barry's got his ACME rocket cycle, and he's determined to try it out. DeMille had a slightly more plausible take on the TWA situation, I think he called it 'nightfall'
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 06:00 PM
JiB-- America didn't fail-- the politicians and their cronies ruined us. I have the same type of bias as you, 21 and 19 yo kids.. good kids if I don't say so myself, whose future is darkened by the debt and welfare mentality our political elites have foisted on us.
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2012 at 06:01 PM
Here is another view of the claim that the RNC is banned by consent decree fro working to secure ballots everywhere.http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/10/the-ballot-cops/309085/
Yes. it's the Atlantic but it does not appear to be an unbalanced view and it does note that state parties and candidates are not so barred.
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 06:02 PM
Porchlight, thanks for the Bill Whittle links.
Posted by: anonamom | November 30, 2012 at 06:03 PM
'lord love a duck'
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kyle-drennen/2012/11/30/washington-posts-marcus-claims-rices-false-benghazi-comments-were-basi
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 06:03 PM
Those lutefish driven mad Lutheran, oh wait;
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 06:07 PM
TK, the Third Cisruit recently upheld a ontinuation of the consent decree and the matter is pending before the Sup Ct. (I take it that is a petition for ceriorari is pending there.)
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 06:07 PM
Clarice, your 5:44 makes me want to go out and set fire to something.
So these people commit crimes, obstruct investigations, continue to collect federal paychecks from us while also making six-figure salaries from a private company, and to top it all off are involved in a hideously corrupt and incompetent operation that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of innocent people...
And they're going to get full retirement benefits, paid for by us?
Jesus Christ! If anyone on here did anything remotely close to that, we'd be lucky to end our days in federal Supermax prison! But they not only walk away, they get MORE money from us, for the rest of their evil, vicious lives?
Have I got that about right?
Posted by: James D. | November 30, 2012 at 06:08 PM
21,18, and 15 and they do know what they are in for. I tell Red any skill I know is being minimized is exactly what they need to work on.
One of the best gifts beyond an ability to read phonetically is having an attention span at all. Even the Statist Central Big Businesses are shocked by the mushy minds from elite schools.
We are less shocked.
Posted by: rse | November 30, 2012 at 06:10 PM
Narciso @603: the Legacy Media wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the ass. They are characters right out of Orwell. Ole George is glad he died of whatever before the Left turned into his nightmare fiction future.
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2012 at 06:19 PM
Pretty much correct, James D, though the article indicates some criminal charges against them may be pending.
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 06:19 PM
I read the Mexican president elect is on board with Barry's immigration policies.
Wonder if he's on board with Barry's gun emigration policies as implemented by all those full retirement ATF criminals that killed so many Mexicans.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 30, 2012 at 06:20 PM
Has the real action started?
CBS Radio Building Hit By Gunfire
I'm not a violent person, and surely wouldn't advise such a thing, but what would happen if a few of our most strident leftist media big-shots were taken out? They're already afraid of Muslims, to the point of updating their style guides to make sure to show maximum respect to The Prophet. Imagine if they had to show respect to conservatives? Heh. The mind reels.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 30, 2012 at 06:23 PM
--though the article indicates some criminal charges against them may be pending.
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 06:19 PM--
Would that be Eric Holder bringing the criminal charges?
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | November 30, 2012 at 06:23 PM
The PRI has been more amenable to the cartel's approach, and the president elect, specially so, in his home province,
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 06:24 PM
I have friends and family in Southampton and Westhampton Beach who are convinced TWA 800 was shot down by a missile. I have no idea and was living in London at the time. But everyone I know in the area believe it was not a fuel tank issue. Who knows but Cashill's theory is as good as anyone else's.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | November 30, 2012 at 06:27 PM
Perhaps a few million frustrated yunguns could be convinced that they'd have a great afterlife if only they read the Federalist Papers.
Milk and honey, boys.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 30, 2012 at 06:29 PM
He, Iggy. Can you imagine how quickly criminal cases would be ginned up against civilians who pulled such a stunt?
And now--Ta Da--CBO's fab new economic theory--joblessness creates jobs:
From Boston.com
Extending the current level of long-term unemployment benefits for another year would add 300,000 jobs to the economy, according to a report from the Congressional Budget Office. The analysis released Wednesday from the nonpartisan office estimates that keeping jobless benefits would cost the government $30 billion. But it would also lead to more spending by the unemployed, boosting demand for goods and services and creating new jobs. Federal long-term unemployment benefits are set to expire on Dec. 29 for more than 2 million workers unless Congress approves an extension
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 06:35 PM
NK,
We are America and we have elected these treasonous bozos. So we failed. We have failed for the last 100 years to not recognize what the hell was happening to us. I blame education and perception (influenced by television and the low intellect sitcoms and news programs). We have been hypnotized to believe the fiction and fantasy Hollywood has projected. Perception is more than reality it is in fact, fact!
Posted by: Jim Eagle | November 30, 2012 at 06:36 PM
"any skill I know is being minimized is exactly what they need to work on"
RSE,
Geometry, two semesters of basic statistics and two semesters of basic accounting will put a kid at the front of the line. Toss in a solid English comp course and within two years they'll be directing dolts whose only competency is mouthing marxist twaddle.
The ones who learn there's true pleasure in relieving the poor sheep of the burden of that heavy, smelly old fleece every spring should have no problem at all.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | November 30, 2012 at 06:37 PM
JiB@636-- the reason I disagree with that is becuase the political elites never said what they were actually doing. they covered it all up with 'moderate' sounding BS. People are responsible for the government they choose, granted, but don't give the Dems any pass for the lies they've been telling for 60 years.
Posted by: NK | November 30, 2012 at 06:41 PM
Yes, but that raises the notion how do you get it down, then the transmission system of knowledge is itself 'infected', Rick.
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 06:42 PM
NYC's Stage deli has closed-the rent was too high.
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 06:45 PM
have friends and family in Southampton and Westhampton Beach who are convinced TWA 800 was shot down by a missile. I have no idea and was living in London at the time. But everyone I know in the area believe it was not a fuel tank issue. Who knows but Cashill's theory is as good as anyone else's.
The "official" story on that has always seemed like a hot steaming pile that the media quislings exhibited no skepticism over. I remember the New York Review of Books going over some scenario about a fuel tank explosion that I don't think even the writer believed. Given that Slick never told the truth about anything and in that fat tub of garbage Sandy Berger, had a trade attorney acting as National Security Adviser, only served to increase my skepticism. That the usual conspiracy nuts don't talk about this also gives it credibility.
Posted by: Captain Hate | November 30, 2012 at 06:54 PM
What I thought credible about it at the time was my respect for the NTSB which had a reputation for incredible professionalism,CH.
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 06:59 PM
She went 'full tufnel,' after that piece, in the LUN, insisting on one particular hammer:
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 07:00 PM
From Clarice's link:
I fail to see how this is a helpful position for the RNC to convince anyone to remain a loyal member.
If the only battles are being fought in "scattered" local fights by individuals and State Parties that is where my money will go. The "N" in RNC stands for National. You can give up on them and still be a conservative at home.
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 30, 2012 at 07:04 PM
What could possibly go wrong;
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/11/report-british-islamic-charity-accused-of-funding-boko-haram-terrorists/
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 07:11 PM
What I thought credible about it at the time was my respect for the NTSB which had a reputation for incredible professionalism
Had they ever been strong-armed by the gov't? Is the director a presidential appointee?
Answer below the fold.
So let me get this one straight. NTSB board prospects are required to declare a political party affiliation before they can be confirmed? Is that something like the California judges who need to annually report their sexual preference status?Posted by: Extraneus | November 30, 2012 at 07:15 PM
--"TK, the Third Cisruit recently upheld a ontinuation of the consent decree and the matter is pending before the Sup Ct. (I take it that is a petition for ceriorari is pending there.)
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 06:07 PM"--
With all due respect, this is why I get a little steamed. I posted the Third Circuit's opinion at 4:01. A full 2 hours before your post.
Maybe you and DoT think I am incapable because you don't take the time to read what I contribute.
I guess that is my cross...
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 30, 2012 at 07:15 PM
Pretty much correct, James D, though the article indicates some criminal charges against them may be pending.
Who made the decision?
Posted by: Jane - Mock the Media! | November 30, 2012 at 07:17 PM
TK, the RNC appealed that decision to the Third Circuit an lost and now has asked the SCOTUS to rule on it.Nothing precludes the local parties and candidates from fighting for ballot security. The judge seems wrong and so is the Third Circuit but I hardly think that is the RNC's fault. Their fault occurred decades before when they may have engaged in abusive, racist tactics and entered into this broad settlement.
Posted by: Clarice | November 30, 2012 at 07:17 PM
I'm confused by your 6:59, Clarice; are you saying you still believe the official story or have subsequently become skeptical of it? The seeming lack of subsequent liability concerns over it and how other planes could be impacted that NK mentioned also triggered my BS detectors.
Posted by: Captain Hate | November 30, 2012 at 07:19 PM
Wow, that Townhall F&F article says those named have had their security clearances pulled. That must really sting in a town where the WH has apparently decreed that the MB is entitled to know every secret the US has. Where such leakers as Ted Kennedy and his friends have leaked every secret the US has had.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1724508/posts
" a Democratic activist in California recruited as a KGB agent during a visit to Russia. The agent, who is not identified by name in the reports noted by Mitrokhin, had a wide circle of influential contacts in the Democratic Party: among them Governor Jerry Brown of California, Senator Alan Cranston, Senator Eugene McCarthy, Senator Edward Kennedy, Senator Abraham Ribicoff, Senator J. William Fulbright and Congressman John Conyers, Jr"
Posted by: pagar | November 30, 2012 at 07:20 PM
Well what strikes me about that settlement, is how little legal justification, they put forth, and the acceptance of many 'alleged' in the fact summary, they cite the law for the modification of the degree, but not the logic behind the original decision,
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 07:23 PM
Yes, read further, pagar, and the subject is identified as Sen, John Tunney, the son of the boxer, right.
Posted by: narciso | November 30, 2012 at 07:26 PM