The new tax deal raises rates for couples earning more than $450,000 but... it also begins the phase-out of various deductions at $250,000.
One might think that deductions are more valuable (and hence, the phase-out would hit harder) in the Blue States with high state, local taxes and property. But, as the NY Times explains, its complicated since at that income level the Alternative Minimum Tax can come into play as well.
The net effect, per the example they found an expert willing to climb a limb - for couples grossing just under the new $450,000 threshold the new deal apparently hits harder in Texas than in New York. Go, Obama and Boo, Boehner.
We thank, and the Times cites, Mark Luscombe, principal analyst with CCH, a tax information provider [link]. From the Times story comes this explanation of the chart above:
Much will depend on your own situation. CCH ran two hypothetical cases for me, which you can see in the accompanying graphic. The first examined a family of four in New York with $400,000 in adjusted gross income and $79,000 in total itemized deductions. The household pays the A.M.T. in both 2012 and under the new tax rules in 2013. They pay just $790 more in 2013, but that includes $1,350 in new Medicare taxes. (The total does not include the Social Security payroll tax that has been restored to its prerecession level.)
A family in Texas, however, might have the same income but lower property taxes and no income tax and thus lower deductions for its federal tax return. Their deductions are just $43,700, but they end up being hurt more by the new rules. They would have no A.M.T. liability in 2013 and would end up paying $3,852 more, or about $2,500 if you don’t count the $1,350 from the new Medicare tax.
Wow - setting aside the new ObamaCare tax, the New York family pays less under this new "soak the rich" reform.
Welcome to the tax Hell of the AMT....
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 09:46 AM
Tax hikes aimed at Texans? Imagine that?
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | January 03, 2013 at 09:46 AM
What was the line, you get nothing, also there was something about 'revenge' I recall,
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 09:56 AM
PS: I wouldn't read too much into this; the vagaries of the AMT are such that unequal results between high income families abound-- to my untrained tax eye, they seem to be random results. That said --the Dems like Schumer had to get the threshold for the killer rate higher because so many of their reliable liberal voters are at about that $400K taxable level. This story will have legs though-- when the Obamaniacs come back for debt increase and sandy $$$-- you think the Texas/Fla House members will be happy to oblige?
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 10:18 AM
When did state taxes become deductible?
I've never understood the rationale behind it since every other Sch A deduction is either a behavior the Feds want to encourage (investment interest) or an expense that one incurs involuntarily (medical expenses).
I can only assume it was shoved through by high tax states in the past.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 03, 2013 at 10:24 AM
Off topic.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2253246/If-theres-apocalyptic-zombie-invasion-rest-assured-prepared.html
http://www.cdc.gov/phpr/zombies.htm
Why all the Zombie talk?
Oh...
Maybe if Hollywood wouldn't glorify "zombies" like they do "guns" we wouldn't have to worry so much.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2012/11/08/trailer-brad-pitt-takes-on-zombies-in-world-war-z/1692593/
Too late.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 03, 2013 at 10:24 AM
the math,
it burns.
_________
Posted by: BumperStickerist | January 03, 2013 at 10:29 AM
My pick for Speaker of The House:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Wl2sfeeqfM
Text only:
http://mcclintock.house.gov/2013/01/fiscal-cliff-deal.shtml
No wonder the GOP keeps him hidden.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 03, 2013 at 10:32 AM
IG-- Reagan did try to eliminate the State Tax deduction in '86, but his partner in Tax Reform Bill Bradley couldn't possibly get that done with the Dem controlled Congress.
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 10:33 AM
"Affidavit: Retired Resident Agent in Charge/Special Agent from the Department of Homeland Security and Retired Coast Guard Investigative Service Chief Investigator, Jeffery Stephen Coffman; Obama's Forged Selective Service
Affidavit Signed January 2, 2013
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/01/dhs-special-agent-obama-forged-selective-service.html
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 03, 2013 at 10:37 AM
I know I'm flogging the dead horse here, but HRH BarryI signing the tax bill by 'autopen' is just further proof of his disgraceful petulance and conceit. He's no man, he's a spoiled little brat.
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 10:37 AM
He's no man, he's a spoiled little brat.
NK, you left out "evil."
Posted by: centralcal | January 03, 2013 at 10:40 AM
I
agree, NK.
As for the unfairness of blue state deductions, consider that they carry a disproportionate burden of the old, sick, unemployables and destitute immigrants. I pay more taxes in DC than my Va neighbors do. In part because of profligate spending here but ALSO because those who need assistance congregate here as they do in big cities throughout the US.
Posted by: Clarice | January 03, 2013 at 10:42 AM
--As for the unfairness of blue state deductions, consider that they carry a disproportionate burden of the old, sick, unemployables and destitute immigrants. I pay more taxes in DC than my Va neighbors do.-
OK, but why are any of them deductible?
I got to deduct almost $12,000 in timber yield tax in 2011. Why?
There are seven categories of Sch A deductions and one of those things is not like the others.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 03, 2013 at 10:50 AM
BTW, how did I miss the news that ManBearPig sold Current TV (sounds like the fruit canning channel) to Al Jazeera?
When did that happen?
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 03, 2013 at 10:52 AM
Um, one of those causes the other. You get more of what you subsidize.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | January 03, 2013 at 10:52 AM
Rob-
Fed dollars and Congressional districts are allocated by the number of PEOPLE, not citizens, also.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | January 03, 2013 at 10:54 AM
Would this face mislead us;
http://www.jammiewf.com/2013/nyc-occu-bomb-suspect-hey-im-just-a-sportsman-or-something/
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 10:54 AM
Yes, and he was trying to sell it under the wire;
http://news.yahoo.com/glenn-beck-tried-buy-current-tv-rejected-032853589--finance.html
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 10:58 AM
It might be a good idea if we didn't subsidize so heavily the poor in cities, but we lack the power to move them out and in rural areas they are less visible and the urgency of subsidies seems less obvious.
On another note--good grief. gay marines protest women grunts: http://www.duffelblog.com/2012/07/gay-infantry-marines-protest-female-grunts/
Posted by: Clarice | January 03, 2013 at 10:59 AM
You know there is a point, when ignorance has reached critical mass;
http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-soars-palin-plummets-most-143025450.html
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 11:07 AM
Clarice, I think that duffelblog site is a parody site...The Onion with a military theme.
Posted by: Janet | January 03, 2013 at 11:08 AM
Narc-- thanks for the JWF link to the Manhattan Bombadier Aaron Greene. I note that Rob Crawford commented there. Another commenter observed that according to the NY Post any rifle in Manhattan is an 'assault rifle'. Well that might acyually be factually accurate-- while we could use a good pigeon cull in Manhattan, not much other game about for sportsmen to hunt- so the rifle owners in Manhattan have other uses in mind....
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 11:08 AM
Right, NK, using HTMD in an enclosed urban space,
why not go for TATP, it could have been worse he could have transfats and a 32 oz soda, then the penalties are really severe.
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 11:15 AM
From the last thread 'cause I'm not all the way through it -
I don't think Cantor will be better as Speaker at all. He'll be targeted worse than Boehner already is.
Boehner appears to be a bumbling along fellow but I believe that is a ruse.
Posted by: glasater | January 03, 2013 at 11:22 AM
Narc-- my personal suspicion is that the NYPD busted in on the Greene-Gleidman Armory on a tip they were hoarding 20 OZ bottles of sugared beverages...
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 11:27 AM
*snort*
My father spent ten years fighting the slum lord who ran the trailer park built next to our farm. The occupants -- responsible for the majority of our township's crimes -- were on various forms of federal assistance. Neither the operator nor the occupants had a concept of "not your property", with the construction of the place starting with the bulldozing of one of our fence lines, proceeding to the dumping of raw sewage into one of our ponds, and settling down to years of crop damage.
The only solution to the chronically "poor" is to cut them off. If they can work, they must.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | January 03, 2013 at 11:33 AM
They don't care who they have to pay off, or slander, that's why they keep Pelosi, Rangel,
McMillan in the leadership. Our side, is hesitant to point out the truth, and they stick a chiv in those who do,
I don't know if Cantor will be more success than Boehner, but it is unlikely he will be less,
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 11:33 AM
Like travelling to other places to hunt?
Posted by: Rob Crawford | January 03, 2013 at 11:34 AM
one small detail omitted from this evaluation ...
the NY couple would pay $34,000 in state and local taxes (assume they are NYC residents)
kind of makes up for the minor difference in federal taxes ...
Posted by: JeffC | January 03, 2013 at 11:36 AM
Good morning - long holiday is over and I am back at work, but wanted everyone at JOM (or the JOMO Tribe as JiB calls us) to know a beautiful bouquet will be delivered to Sue mid-morning (Texas time) today from all of us.
I tried really hard to get the colors of the US Navy Seal insignia (about half of the insignias are blue and yellow) replicated in yellow and blue flowers. Alas, blue flowers are extremely rare and none are in season right now.
Posted by: centralcal | January 03, 2013 at 11:40 AM
That's a wonderful thing to do central.
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 11:42 AM
You know, Janet, you're right and shame on me --that's the second time they caught me out. They are damned good at it.
Posted by: Clarice | January 03, 2013 at 11:42 AM
Well some of the links, on the sidebar would suggest they weren't on the level, but like Phillip Roth said in the mid 80s, he stopped writing fiction, for a time, because reality
kept topping him,
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 11:48 AM
That's ok, Clarice; look at the White House and it's like we're living in a parody.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 03, 2013 at 11:48 AM
cc, has taken charge and done a wonderful job.
Posted by: Clarice | January 03, 2013 at 11:48 AM
I know it's shocking, but there's no real hunting or sport shooting rifle culture in Manhattan. No doubt that some of the super-rich go to the weekend house and shoot skeet on the range, or go at targets with their 9mms, but it's a small subculture. Gone are the days when sunday evenings on the southbound NYS ThruWay would bring stationwagons with the weekend deer trophy strapped to the roof and/or fender-- that was the outer borough and near suburb working man's sport back in the day. That's been gone for almost 40 years. Now the deer live in the boroughs and near suburbs, and they sneer at us humans, because they know none of us have rifles next to our daughters' field hockey sticks in the basement.
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 11:50 AM
Yes, and I know which film in particular;
http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/americathon/
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 11:54 AM
It's like that really annoying Geico commercial,
with the two pitchmen and the lion (it used to be they were economical, but wasting so much money on bogus advertising) among other things, made them two expensive.
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 12:03 PM
"Before lawmakers get back to the business of arguing about taxes, deficits and other issues, there was just a nice moment outside the Capitol.
Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., who suffered a stroke last Jan. 21, came to the Capitol for the first time since then. And as C-SPAN cameras watched, he made a very public return — slowly walking up the steps of the Capitol with assistance from Vice President Biden and Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W. Va."
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/01/03/168539786/nice-moment-sen-mark-kirk-returns-to-capitol-one-year-after-stroke
After a stroke? Hil can't make it up those steps before a stroke.
Maybe The Two Joes can help her up to the top...
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 03, 2013 at 12:08 PM
They all got their piece of the action;
http://moonbattery.com/?p=23403
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 12:15 PM
"When did that happen?"
Most of the reports I have read say that it was hurried up to happen in 2012, because Gore wanted to save on taxes.
http://twitchy.com/2013/01/03/al-gore-cashes-in-on-sweet-sweet-big-oil-money-avoids-paying-fair-share-twitter-cashes-in-on-laughs/?utm_source=autotweet&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=twitter
The reason that he went with the Al Jazeera offer:
http://www.therightscoop.com/says-it-all-current-tv-rejected-glenn-beck-purchase-offer-over-ideology-accepted-al-jazeera-offer/
Posted by: pagar | January 03, 2013 at 12:24 PM
Narc-- thanks for the Buffett tax payoff link. BTW-- I have made a fair degree of headway with persuadable Libs recently that the mutual enemy of all working stiffs is the DC culture of corruption-- all legal of course. I explain to them how the DC Dems are in league with the super rich to sell special tax breaks to the highest bidder, and the target of these special deals is the rest of us working stiff taxpayers. Then the DC Dems take our tax money and spend it on the nonworking poor to bribe their votes with entitlement spending. A lib B-I-L of mine bought in and said-- well we'll just have to cut spending to the level of tax revenue. After I finished laughing, I told him to take a look at his boy Barry's last 3 spending budgets and get back to me on that. Small steps-- but I think alot of soft Libs will have their eyes openned by their payroll and medicaid taxes kicking back in, and Debt limit fight. I know-- I'm a hopeless optimist.
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 12:25 PM
it's like a cage match, who do you root for;
http://twitchy.com/2013/01/02/thats-rich-piers-morgan-calls-andrew-sullivans-subscription-venture-a-deluded-vanity-flight/
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 12:28 PM
but I think alot of soft Libs will have their eyes openned by their payroll and medicaid taxes kicking back in, and Debt limit fight. I know-- I'm a hopeless optimist.
DOOM! Afternoon folks. Back to civilization in less than 24 hours.
Posted by: RichatUF | January 03, 2013 at 12:29 PM
I feel the same wayNK/ Toss us in with Nellie Forbush in the cockeyed optimists club.
Posted by: Clarice | January 03, 2013 at 12:30 PM
http://illinoispaytoplay.com/2013/01/03/the-valerie-plame-case-why-was-patrick-fitzgerald-appointed-special-counsel/
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 03, 2013 at 12:30 PM
Narc-- don't discount Piers Morgan's take on this-- if anyone knows anything about deluded vanity flights of fancy... it's our boy Piers. Of course Andi-Pandi won't make any real dough off of the Andi-Pandi site, but what makes you think that sharp clawed corporate catfighter Tina Brown would continue to pay his outsized salary? Andy's getting outta Tina's farm before he was culled IMO.
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 12:38 PM
The man to see there, is Comey, corporate counsel to Lockheed, just like the fellow who
railroaded that guy, who Clarice successfully defended, counsel to UT, Armitage ended up Erdogan's public face in the States, Fitz should be as nervous as a twin tailed cat, but he's sitting pretty at I forget which firm.
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 12:38 PM
Ten minutes that will never make it to the inside of a courtroom:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFCs8vaZ2s4
Sad
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 03, 2013 at 12:39 PM
Fitz went to Jenner-Block, no?
BTW-- this Comey/Fitz tale that they KNEW Armitage was the leaker and ordered him to tell no one, is astonishing. I'll listen to any conspiracy TK comes up with on this one.
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 12:41 PM
You know we're in a Bizarro world, when Russia is more sensible then France, on this score.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/03/us-russia-depardieu-idUSBRE90206G20130103
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 12:42 PM
So Gerard became a subject of Csar VladI, even though the Franch Constitutional Court struck the 75% rate as 'Unfair'?
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 12:44 PM
the NY couple would pay $34,000 in state and local taxes...kind of makes up for the minor difference in federal taxes
So because they chose to live in a state and locality which extracts higher taxes for the ostensible benefit of that state and locality they shouldn't have to pay as much for the ostensible benefit of the nation as a whole?
Posted by: bgates | January 03, 2013 at 12:45 PM
Somebody just cast a vote for Allen West for Speaker.
Heh.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | January 03, 2013 at 12:45 PM
Wonderful job, Ccal. By the way, it's blue and gold.
I have a nephew who lives in Manhattan and has five or six rifles, including an H&H .375 Mag elephant gun, with which he hunts in places like Texas.
Posted by: Danube of Thought iPad | January 03, 2013 at 12:46 PM
Good Morning from Hawthorne, California.
It was exactly 50 years ago (in 2 days) that Hawthorne's Bryan Wilson, along with his 2 brothers, cousin Mike, and David what's his name who later quit, recorded Surfin USA.
As I look out the window of my cheesy Motel (The Ayers) overlooking some SoCal boulevard, and a Mall with a CostCo, a Staples, a Bed Bath and Beyond, and a big McDonalds, I dream about gettin' bugged driving up and down this same old strip
I gotta find'a new place where the kids are hip.
Yes. I get a round.
I'm a real cool head
I'm makin' real good bread
Wah wa ooo
Wah wa ooo
Wah wa ooo
So what'll it be today in the next few hours, before deadheading west? I think I still have time to go
buy some baggies
Huarachi sandals, too
Then maybe then I'll catch 'em surfin at Del Mar
Ventura County line
Santa Cruz and Tressels,
Australia's Narabine,
All over Manhattan,
And down Doheny way
Everybody's gone surfin'
Surfin U.S.A.
Oh fer sure!
Posted by: daddy | January 03, 2013 at 12:46 PM
Right but he had offers from Skadden Arps, I explained why certain people are deemed not worthy of scrutiny much less prosecution, and others are,
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 12:46 PM
Good article about how the Feds rig the game to win criminal cases, linked by Insty.
How the Feds Disable Criminal Defense
Posted by: Extraneus | January 03, 2013 at 12:50 PM
They chose not to go after Whitey for racketeering or murder, that's kind of remarkable,
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 12:53 PM
I'm with Bgates-- my wife and I unfortunately pay those kinds of NY/NJ/Ct State income taxes, and we dutifly declare those deuctions from federal taxable income. It's ridiculous-- RR's capped total federal deductions is the way to go. Let every taxpayer have a hard cap on deuctions, and they can choose how they want to live their lives within those deductions, and the rest is taxable-- AT A LOWER RATE of course. Never happen-- because it would take away the role of the DC whores as middlemen-- every criminal knows that the secret to a successful criminal life is being a good middleman. The DC and EU crooks know that all too well.
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 12:55 PM
this Comey/Fitz tale that they KNEW Armitage was the leaker and ordered him to tell no one, is astonishing. I'll listen to any conspiracy TK comes up with on this one.
Look in the archives here. I came up with all sorts of conspiracy theories on that. This place was Plame central for a while. Still can't be;ieve that Libby got convicted and Fitz was able to use as evidence on the the WaPo article "not for its truth value, but for state of mind".
Great job centralcal and Sue, I'm praying for a Texas sized recovery for you. Kick its ass like a Texan!
Posted by: RichatUF | January 03, 2013 at 12:55 PM
RichatUF-- I do remember, I started reading JOM b/c of the Libby trial. I just don't remember the angle that Comey/Fitz told Armitage not to speak to anyone about him being the leaker-- BEFORE Fitz was ever appointed.
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 12:58 PM
Yikes...need more coffee...
Fitz was able to use as evidence on the the WaPo article
Fitz was able to use as evidence a WaPo article...
it still looks like gibberish...more coffee...
Posted by: RichatUF | January 03, 2013 at 12:59 PM
Well narciso,
Aaron Greene did found the NEON UNDERPANTIES student Protest group at Art School, so there's that in his favor when a Judge is considering leniency for a bomb making heroin addict. And the Beach Boys recorded a tune by Charlie Manson, "Never Learn Not to Love," (Flip side of Bluebirds over the Mountain) so all things being equal...
Posted by: daddy | January 03, 2013 at 01:00 PM
It's not supposed to make sense, Rich, that's the point, Yes Libby was foolish to deny to Bush he had spoken to Miller and Cooper, but that doesn't justify 'this travesty of a mockery of a sham;
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 01:02 PM
You're right, daddy, as Bender told Fry, 'Sir you forget yourself' or things of that nature.
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 01:06 PM
The sad epilogue of the tale; Libby was foolish; Bush was lied to; the real liars and scoundrels were Wilson/Plame and they got themselves a big payday and live off Plame's pension; Fitz now makes a fortune on the billable hour-- but was he as big a scoundrel as Wilson/Plame? Did he fabricate the whole investigation like some kind of Captain Queeg looking for the IceBox duplicate key? Is there a definitive answer to that?
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 01:08 PM
No, Fitz was told which targets were safe, and
which weren't to be touched, and people who examined his record, like Peter Lance, who I admit is a little crazy, they get the third degree, meanwhile that bucket of tripe, that James Stewart put together gets approval.
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 01:18 PM
Told by?
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 01:26 PM
If you like touching pictures of babies, I just put a link up on the "Law of Intended Consequences" thread.
Posted by: pagar | January 03, 2013 at 01:27 PM
Think about it, they flip Rezko to go after some beat punk like Blago, but they don't touch Obama
or any of Daley's inner circle, because they are so much more circumspect,
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 01:28 PM
But in january 2004 when he was appointed.. who 'told' Fitz what to do in the leak case?
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 01:39 PM
Wasn't it Comey?
Yeah, Boehner was reelected speaker and the reptilian Pelosi is speaking.
Posted by: RichatUF | January 03, 2013 at 01:55 PM
how many more hours in town, daddy? Can come and buy you a beer.E mail me if you can make it.
Posted by: matt | January 03, 2013 at 01:56 PM
NK-
If I recall, it was at the time Ashcroft was sick and in the hospital and there was some inside baseball stuff going on with different policies the Bush Admin wanted to persue and Justice was pushing back. IIRC, it was Fitz who told Armitage not to talk and since he was a "special prosecutor" he was abe to roam free of any sort of accountability. The lead FBI agent in the case also seemed to make a quick retirement, even before the trial.
In other news, Obama made a hostage vid saying "the wealthiest Americans still aren’t paying their “fair share” of taxes", so thanks suckers for voting him. I was thinking that a good show for the debt fight would be to take a line-by-line budget of federal government spending and a few boxes of highlighters and tell the president now that he got his tax increase he can go ahead and start highlighting what to cut, since the modest tax hikes were all we needed.
Posted by: RichatUF | January 03, 2013 at 02:11 PM
And is that captch thing getting harder? It took me 3 times to get the stupid thing right.
Posted by: RichatUF | January 03, 2013 at 02:13 PM
But that wasn't till March of that year, as I recall, and that had to do with the TSP reauthorization. Comey is better known, if at all for being the 'slayer' of that fearsome beast, Martha Stewart.
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 02:15 PM
Ah yes, DoT, but there are really no "gold" fresh flowers - only different shades of yellow, some of which might be called golden. *wink*
Posted by: centralcal | January 03, 2013 at 02:18 PM
I'll defer to your memory narciso.
Posted by: RichatUF | January 03, 2013 at 02:28 PM
FWIW, a cup of coffee, perhaps;
In early January 2006, The New York Times, as part of their investigation into alleged domestic surveillance by the National Security Agency, reported that Comey, who was Acting Attorney General during the March 2004 surgical hospitalization of John Ashcroft, refused to "certify" the legality of central aspects of the NSA program at that time. The certification was required under existing White House procedures to continue the program. After Comey's refusal, the newspaper reported, Andrew H. Card Jr., White House Chief of Staff, and Alberto R. Gonzales, then White House counsel and future Attorney General, made an emergency visit to the George Washington University Hospital [4], to attempt to win approval directly from Ashcroft for the program.[6]
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 02:34 PM
Coffee isn't helping. Finished a 2 week, 12hr/shift rotation. Next week I have appointments, advising, and orientation for school and most likely rotating to my new work schedule.
I'm beat.
Posted by: RichatUF | January 03, 2013 at 02:40 PM
OK-- but according to today's report in October 2003, Armitage told State Flunkie Marc Grossman and Powell that Armitage was the the leaker, then keep his mouth shut and told no one else, until the January 2004 Fitz appointment, then he told Fitz and Fitz told him to keep his mouth shut. Yet, Fitz knowing all this, prosecutes Libby for lying to the FBI (which Libby did). WTF?
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 02:44 PM
I already explained the reason, and we only have Eickenrode's account that suggest he lied, and his notes went missing, they needed to 'Watergate' this administration, and Libby was the vehicle,
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 02:47 PM
WTF?
Pretty much.
Posted by: RichatUF | January 03, 2013 at 02:49 PM
So, Buffett and Immelt and the Goldman factotum, all got their 'piece of the action' along with Spielperg and Weinstein, et al, and they are still cheering it like some great victory,
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 02:53 PM
NK-
Armitage brought it to State GC Taft(?) and Powell and then State called Gonzoles, who at the time, was White House General Counsel. Gonzo didn't want to know and for reasons know only to Powell and Armitage, they didn't gossip about to their friends in the media. So your "WTF" about the whole thing stands. I'm still hopelessly confused about the whole thing.
Posted by: RichatUF | January 03, 2013 at 02:56 PM
Yes William Howard Taft the 4th, relative of the twit in Ahia, that helped crash the party, all these people were against going to war in Iraq, and Gitmo, and the TSP, this was the trifecta to deal with it, nothing else makes more sense,
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 03:01 PM
Narc-- I understand the motive completely anti-Iraq guys punishing Libby the neocon, Libby-- Cheney's BFF. I just can't wrap my head around Armitage, Powell, Gonzales, no one telling Ashcroft/Bush that Armitage was the leaker and he told the truth about it. How can that happen-- or not happen. This is captain Queeg and the second key investigation stuff, but this really happened.
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 03:07 PM
"Fitz knowing all this, prosecutes Libby for lying to the FBI (which Libby did)."
It is very unlikely Libby deliberately misled the GJ. About six months after the events following Joe Wilson's op ed (falsely claiming Cheney behested him to Africa) and Novak's report (revealing Joe likely behested by his wife in the CIA), Libby's recollection of the events were different than several other individuals.
To me those 2 dramatic public revelations seem like the type of events that jumble people's recollections months later.
Posted by: boris | January 03, 2013 at 03:08 PM
Colonel Mustard, in the clubroom, with the wrench.
What'd I win?
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | January 03, 2013 at 03:10 PM
You mispelled wench.
Posted by: boris | January 03, 2013 at 03:12 PM
Why did Serino recommend Zimmerman be arrested, even though there was no evidence, why did Soufan insist we got no information out of Zubeydah, why did Harry Reid say Romney didn't pay taxes, it's in their nature.
Posted by: narciso | January 03, 2013 at 03:12 PM
A gold star and free posting privilages to JOM for all of 2013!
Posted by: RichatUF | January 03, 2013 at 03:14 PM
Of course Libby wilfully and deliberately lied to the FBI. Bush had ordered no contact with the media-- Libby was was spinning to the media-- off the record of course. Unfortunately for Libby, Armitage was also spinning-- different things-- to the media. Libby didn't want to lose his job and authority, so he lied to Bush and lied to the FBI. Sorry-- that's the simple truth. Now, the prosecution was a sham of a fraud, but that doesn't change facts.
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 03:25 PM
Thanks, Rich! That's great! I've been getting tired of the bitcoin charges.
Posted by: Melinda Romanoff | January 03, 2013 at 03:26 PM
Obama made a hostage vid saying "the wealthiest Americans still aren’t paying their “fair share” of taxes",
Can somebody in power please respond that the problem is not American's not paying their fair share of taxes but Congress spending more than their fair share of Taxes.
Can anyone up there please go on offense? Please.
Posted by: daddy | January 03, 2013 at 03:27 PM
If I had been the leaker and Fitz told me not to tell anyone, I hope I would have had the courage to call a news conference immediately and tell everything I knew, including what Fitz had told me not to do. Obviously Armitage did not have that courage.
Fitz could always have cried "obstruction of justice," but imagine trying to prosecute such a charge in those circumstances.
Scum.
Posted by: Danube of Thought iPad | January 03, 2013 at 03:28 PM
DoT-- I guess you have the best explanation. Fitz had a conviction for lying to the FBI-- so he abused power and told Armitage to shut up. If Libby burned it was no biggie to Armitage.
Posted by: NK | January 03, 2013 at 03:33 PM
"Sorry-- that's the simple truth"
Pretty much everything you wrote there was inaccurate. Simple and sorry, but not the way you mean.
Posted by: boris | January 03, 2013 at 03:40 PM