To arm or not to arm? That was the question vexing our Hamlet of the Potomac as he grappled with the Syria problem.
Fortunately, he had a lot of angst and recognized it as a troublesome, nuanced problem, so libs who would otherwise be appalled by this decision to arm the rebels can be reassured - the President is no more committed to our current course of action than they are. His application of the Powell doctrine is that he didn't break it and he is damn well not going to own it.
A few years down the road his daughters will be arrested as part of their role in anti-war demonstrations, so its all good.
'good news eerybody'
http://washingtonexaminer.com/7-of-9-key-syrian-rebel-fighter-groups-are-islamist/article/2531928?custom_click=rss
OTOH,the T-Dawg's favorite kickboxing imam, Feiz Mohammed, met his end in Syria
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 10:30 AM
He's just not that smart.
Posted by: MarkO | June 15, 2013 at 10:45 AM
Nothing that he is sending to those rebels will make any difference at all.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | June 15, 2013 at 10:47 AM
It's almost as if, here's a shocker he had already made the decision;
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM
I'm for arming whichever side is losing in any conflict between Muslims.
Posted by: Extraneus | June 15, 2013 at 10:50 AM
King Abdullah, you might ask Carlos Menem, how these things turn out,
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM
We've seen this rodeo before, it doesn't end well;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-preparing-to-deliver-rebels-arms-through-turkey-and-jordan/2013/06/14/e38dabf2-d522-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 10:57 AM
It's almost as if, here's a shocker he had already made the decision;
"That’s how it was in Libya where the intervention was not triggered by the phony genocide, but by Gaddafi ‘s gains. And that is what is pushing along the intervention now. Not the supposed use of chemical weapons, but the gains made by Assad."
http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-official-admits-they-would-have-lied-about-red-line-breach/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=obama-official-admits-they-would-have-lied-about-red-line-breach
Posted by: Janet --- -... .- -- .- ... ..- -.-. -.- ... | June 15, 2013 at 11:14 AM
I'm invisible! Take that NSA
Posted by: Jane on Ipad hi there NSA | June 15, 2013 at 11:22 AM
Hmmmm, let me try. Alice, thanks for the link. I put it on my homepage .
Henry, I'm in art museum territory visiting my neice's and husband. We went to Bridgids last night. It was great. Today visiting my nephew, and Monday it is back to Naples.
Jib, half of Merion is located in people's back yards. The rest of it is knee deep in mud.
If this doesn't post Its the NSA's Fault.
Posted by: Jane on Ipad hi there NSA | June 15, 2013 at 11:30 AM
"He's just not that smart."
No, he isn't. I've noticed that about a whole lot of lifetime "public servants."
God help us all.
Posted by: anonamom | June 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM
If you wait long enough even well intentioned interventions become useless if not counterproductive. I understand about 90k people have already been killed; "our side" is now allied with AQ and just beheaded a 14 y.o.boy for slandering the prophet; and both sides are using chem weapons.
Good job, Hamlet.
Posted by: Clarice | June 15, 2013 at 11:38 AM
http://www.siotw.org/modules/myalbum/photo.php?lid=346
Posted by: Clarice | June 15, 2013 at 11:41 AM
Jane, sounds like you're in good company!
Posted by: henry | June 15, 2013 at 11:45 AM
If no one noticed, the imams are at full volume calling for a Sunni - Shia jihad and vicey versey.
Of course this serves our ends by depriving the world of several thousands more jihadis who won't be protesting obscure videos. Maybe even the tollybons can send reinforcements.
Posted by: matt | June 15, 2013 at 11:56 AM
"--If you wait long enough even well intentioned interventions become useless if not counterproductive.--"
I am no longer willing to give this creep the benefit of the doubt whatsoever.
The speech and antics of a pea and thimble man are always to distract while his intent is always to steal.
Barry's banal speeches notwithstanding, his intentions are pretty hard to ignore anymore as he invariably assists the side most anti American and harmful to our and our allies' interests. That he can find enemies to support worse the Qaddafi and Assad indicates that while he isn't that smart he is quite ruthless and determined and is getting what he wants.
His outrageous attempts to support what amounted to a left wing coup in Honduras early on were not an aberration but the beginning of a foreign policy invariably hostile to our interests and friendly to anti American dictators and ideologies.
He doesn't have a well intentioned bone in his boney little body.
Posted by: Ignatz | June 15, 2013 at 11:58 AM
Meet General Keith Alexander.
Leading us in the war we better win. An excerpt:
"In its tightly controlled public relations, the NSA has focused attention on the threat of cyberattack against the US—the vulnerability of critical infrastructure like power plants and water systems, the susceptibility of the military’s command and control structure, the dependence of the economy on the Internet’s smooth functioning. Defense against these threats was the paramount mission trumpeted by NSA brass at congressional hearings and hashed over at security conferences.
But there is a flip side to this equation that is rarely mentioned: The military has for years been developing offensive capabilities, giving it the power not just to defend the US but to assail its foes. Using so-called cyber-kinetic attacks, Alexander and his forces now have the capability to physically destroy an adversary’s equipment and infrastructure, and potentially even to kill. Alexander—who declined to be interviewed for this article—has concluded that such cyberweapons are as crucial to 21st-century warfare as nuclear arms were in the 20th.
And he and his cyberwarriors have already launched their first attack. The cyberweapon that came to be known as Stuxnet was created and built by the NSA in partnership with the CIA and Israeli intelligence in the mid-2000s. The first known piece of malware designed to destroy physical equipment, Stuxnet was aimed at Iran’s nuclear facility in Natanz. By surreptitiously taking control of an industrial control link known as a Scada (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) system, the sophisticated worm was able to damage about a thousand centrifuges used to enrich nuclear material.
The success of this sabotage came to light only in June 2010, when the malware spread to outside computers. It was spotted by independent security researchers, who identified telltale signs that the worm was the work of thousands of hours of professional development. Despite headlines around the globe, officials in Washington have never openly acknowledged that the US was behind the attack. It wasn’t until 2012 that anonymous sources within the Obama administration took credit for it in interviews with The New York Times."
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 11:59 AM
And in other news, the Twelfth Imam is in the building.
Posted by: matt | June 15, 2013 at 12:03 PM
Sunni vs Shia? Kinda like when Michigan plays Notre Dame, the only way I win is if both lose!
Posted by: Gmax | June 15, 2013 at 12:05 PM
Yeah, and drones.
Posted by: MarkO | June 15, 2013 at 12:10 PM
The screw-ups by this administration are astonishing.
Their incompetence has gone beyond comprehension.
Yet they're getting support from 52% of Americans. LOL
Posted by: N. Y. Nick | June 15, 2013 at 12:15 PM
I doubt Rohani is the 12th Imam, or even if he's the conciliatory moderate he is supposed to be. But 72% turnout and no cries of 'foul' seems to indicate he's the same 'muddle' we struggle with. No changes here.
Posted by: Corn-fed conservative (southern strategy version) | June 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM
Is this part of the Arab spring?? Because nobody told me that 90,000 people were going to die in Syria in the Arab spring.
My namesake, Great Grandfather is buried in Damascus. WW1.
OBAMA, leading from behind.
Posted by: Gus | June 15, 2013 at 12:18 PM
Right On! Ignatz 11:58
Twitter:
Debra Burlingame @DebraBurlingame 2m
Glad my brother, U.S. F-4 fighter pilot, not witnessing Navy jets put in service of Islamists who cheered death of his passengers and crew.
Posted by: Ann | June 15, 2013 at 12:20 PM
Good Lord, we're sending them small arms. Why not cyanide capsules instead, and get the thing over with.
Posted by: Danube of Thought | June 15, 2013 at 12:20 PM
MarkO, has Obama ok'd a drone strike on Snowden yet? He says he has the power to do so.
Posted by: Gus | June 15, 2013 at 12:21 PM
Danube, I think Obama has unleashed the IRS on them.
Now they'll pay.
Posted by: Gus | June 15, 2013 at 12:22 PM
The small arms were old Mr. Magoo's bright idea.
Imagine if he had been an admiral in Viet Nam.
Posted by: N. Y. Nick | June 15, 2013 at 12:28 PM
Debra Burlingame @DebraBurlingame 2m
Glad my brother, U.S. F-4 fighter pilot, not witnessing Navy jets put in service of Islamists who cheered death of his passengers and crew.
It's not like we haven't made temporary pacts with some very unsavory people in the past, but they were always for well defined strategic reasons, of which the current situation is completely bereft.
Posted by: Captain Hate | June 15, 2013 at 12:42 PM
Wash. Times:
Posted by: Danube of Thought | June 15, 2013 at 12:45 PM
Unintended consequences?
"Morell, who also was one of President George W. Bush’s intelligence briefers, has come under criticism from Republicans over the Benghazi talking points, which removed any reference to al-Qaeda from the administration’s initial explanation of the Sept. 11, 2012, attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans."
Interesting times, we live in.
Posted by: Corn-fed conservative (southern strategy version) | June 15, 2013 at 12:52 PM
Avril probably intends to sit in on any conference that the IG might have with CIA employees in the future. You know the same way it was done with the IRS...
Posted by: Gmax | June 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM
All of his appointments have been political hacks,
Cretins who are as unqualified as he was and still is.
Posted by: N. Y. Nick | June 15, 2013 at 01:14 PM
Actually, Avril's role will be to talk dirty to help recruit potential counter-spies.
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 01:23 PM
Like I thought, it's basically musical chairs, Morell gets moved to the FIAB, which is nice and discrete, Haines moves to the deputy director slot, which she has likely already been giving orders,
Entous's piece in the Journal, said the Syrian deal involved convincing the Al Thanis to support General Idris, instead of the Nusra Front, of course, it begs the question why would they.
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 01:29 PM
She does have a turn of phrase;
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/305789-palin-slams-intervention-in-syria-let-allah-sort-it-out#ixzz2WJ7mInXH
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 01:43 PM
" it begs the question why would they."
or how long would their promise to do so be good for?
Posted by: pagar | June 15, 2013 at 01:44 PM
Heh!
If Sarah Palin had Become President
Via Insty. An amazing litany when you think about it.
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 01:45 PM
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/06/the_gladiator_sarah_palin_we_need_you_back_in_the_arena.html
Sarah Palin drives leftists crazy. We need millions like her.
Posted by: pagar | June 15, 2013 at 01:51 PM
He's been a player since the fatwa against Sadat, running all the way to the ISB mosque that
the Tsaenaev's frequented;
http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2013/06/why-west-doesnt-understand-islamists.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FNWlS+%28YID+With+LID%29
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 01:53 PM
Why am I thinking "Harriet Miers?"
Posted by: Danube on iPad | June 15, 2013 at 02:03 PM
Good Morning!
Via Insty, a good post by the Anchoress on Sharyl Attkisson’s computer being hacked in late 2012: No! Sharyl Attkisson’s computer breached? Get OUT!
I wind up hoping that whoever hacked her computer also hacked into James Rosen Computer, because it strikes me that CBS is so invested in Obama they don't want to do an investigation that would point to the Administration:
don’t be alarmed, says CBS:
To be clear, the federal government has not been accused in the intrusion of Attkisson’s computer; CBS News is continuing to work to identify the responsible party.
But Roger Ailes, now there's a different story. I think he justifiably hates the Administration so much he'd probably love to bring the Bast#$d's down.
So here's to hoping with all my heart that James Rosen's Computer was hacked.
Posted by: daddy | June 15, 2013 at 02:12 PM
"His application of the Powell doctrine is that he didn't break it and he is damn well not going to own it."
Sounds like a pretty good doctrine for not getting pulled into an endless war, to me. Certainly better than the doctrine we used for invading Iraq and then occupying it for over a decade: "Invade on the pretext that there are WMDs, and when there aren't, that you're liberating the country, and when you break the country instead of liberating it, announce that you broke it, so now you own it."
I sure wish that Pres. Obama actually WAS acting in accordance with your revised Powell doctrine, instead of taking the first steps toward an another 10- or 20- year U.S. war.
Posted by: Kathy Kattenburg | June 15, 2013 at 02:12 PM
LOL, daddy, at the time, of the Rosen breach, it was so slight, that it merited no attention over at this fine establishment,
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 02:16 PM
Sadly, Assad's brutality isn't new, we have the term 'Hama Rules' from how Poppa Hafez dealt with dissent about thirty some years ago, the last was someone Jimmy Carter and Nancy Pelosi could do business with.
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 02:25 PM
"--Invade on the pretext that there are WMDs, and when there aren't, that you're liberating the country, and when you break the country instead of liberating it, announce that you broke it, so now you own it.--"
I was against doing anything more than putting an end to Saddam's reign of terror and was certainly against the endless unwinnable nation building that followed, but can we be at least a little bit truthful?
The AUMF and UN resolutions were based not only on the threat of WMDs but also on Saddam's decades of violation of treaties and UN mandates, abuse and wholesale murder of his own citizens and destabilizing extra territorial ambitions and outright wars on his neighbors.
There was no country to be broken beyond what he had done. To the extent anything unraveled it was largely because his blood soaked iron grip was finally broken.
Don't worry about Obama though; he only involves us in short wars and speedily withdraws once he has ensured a regime even more hostile to us has been installed.
Posted by: Ignatz | June 15, 2013 at 02:34 PM
Why did Obama surge with so many additional troops in Afghanistan, only to waste so many lives and end up losing?
Iraq wasn't an "endless" war. It ended in a victory that Obama promptly squandered.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | June 15, 2013 at 02:36 PM
DoT, because Zero's surge in Affghanstan had only one purpose: making Zero look "tough" in a "smarrt" war. It had absolutely nothing to do with national security or military strategy.
Every single casualty there was a life deliberately sacrifced by Zero for no purpose except short term domestic poltiical advantage
Posted by: James D. | June 15, 2013 at 02:43 PM
Not to mention how Saddam's Tikriti mob, had dispossessed the Shia majority, had turned the home of the Marsh Arabs into a desert, and had waged two wars including one against a putative ally Kuwait
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 02:46 PM
His application of the Powell doctrine is that he didn't break it and he is damn well not going to own it."
Sounds like a pretty good doctrine for not getting pulled into an endless war, to me. Certainly better than the doctrine we used for invading Iraq and then occupying it for over a decade: "Invade on the pretext that there are WMDs, and when there aren't, that you're liberating the country, and when you break the country instead of liberating it, announce that you broke it, so now you own it."
I sure wish that Pres. Obama actually WAS acting in accordance with your revised Powell doctrine, instead of taking the first steps toward an another 10- or 20- year U.S. war.
Posted by: Kathy Kattenburg | June 15, 2013 at 02:12 PM
Whoa, a dense, very shallow, ditzy and clueless,
but [very] opinionated woman! What a novelty!
Posted by: N. Y. Nick | June 15, 2013 at 02:46 PM
About Banford, between recycling the USS Liberty slander, back in 2000, and then following 'the lied us in to war' template, I'm hesitant to take anything from him, at facevalue,
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 02:48 PM
Sarah is en-fuego here.
More Mort Sahl than politician. But she nails NSA pretty good.
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 02:48 PM
I LOVE Sarah. But, gee, she has let her hair go to hell. I am hoping the make-up/hair people at Fox News help her out on Monday when she co-hosts Fox and Friends!
Posted by: centralcal | June 15, 2013 at 03:03 PM
That's it, Kathy? That's all that you've got?
Posted by: N. Y. Nick | June 15, 2013 at 03:08 PM
After the way, Karzai has turned out to be such a jackalope, I'm really not sanguine on any of these interventions, but one recalls the hatred apriori against Chalabi, whereas we know nothing about this Idris character, except the fact that most of his forces defect to the Nusra front,
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 03:09 PM
Neat photo of the Welsh Guards, holders of the Freedom of Brigend County Borough, trooping the colors on Horse Guards parade.
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 03:17 PM
Every single casualty there was a life deliberately sacrifced by Zero for no purpose except short term domestic poltiical advantage
The JEF lowballed Petraeus and McChrystal in every request, making victory, a term which the clown never employs, impossible. Anybody thinking positively of him for that is either against the country or an idiot; not that they're mutually exclusive. Between that, Fort Hood and Benghazi, I don't know why anybody having a relative in the service hasn't gone full Sheehan.
Posted by: Captain Hate | June 15, 2013 at 03:19 PM
CH-
They wouldn't have the support necessary nor the ruthlessness needed to dispose of her when she was no longer needed. Wonder if any of her friends return her phone calls?
Posted by: [email protected] | June 15, 2013 at 03:36 PM
Well, I guess it is appropriate to have Bob Costas, at the shortest course for the US Open in the last 9 years:)
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 03:43 PM
test
Posted by: daddy | June 15, 2013 at 03:49 PM
If anyone is having trouble on typepad, then I recommend the BR Solution: Put a number before and after your nom de plume; use a phony email address like [email protected]; and, if using a LUN www.typepad.com. Seems to work for links, photos etc.
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 03:54 PM
Just like the Krusty the Clown show
http://twitchy.com/2013/06/14/technical-difficulties-responsible-for-nelson-mandelas-latest-death/
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 03:58 PM
Thanks JiB, for the tip;
http://twitchy.com/2013/06/15/as-someone-whos-kinda-fertile-myself-sarah-palin-takes-a-jab-at-jeb-bush/
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 04:09 PM
OMG, narciso, Sully just lost his erection reading your 4:09:)
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 04:20 PM
When this "Let's arm the Rebel's" news broke yesterday I had on the talk Radio headsets, and during the top of the hour News blurb the reporter girl (ABC or CBS) said something like:
"I've talked to my Military sources and they are very concerned about arming the Rebels, but they all tell me the only thing they are more worried about is not doing anything."
That struck me as complete BS. I think she is lying and it instantly made me believe that it is a Talking Point that they are pushing for the Administration to somewhat justify Obama's actions, and that when it all goes to crap the Administration can respond, "Our Military advisors were telling us we had to act," thus once again assigning blame where it does not belong.
Anyone else heard or read anything similar today?
Posted by: 1daddy in Typepad hell2 | June 15, 2013 at 04:54 PM
Ironically, Sullivan is in agreement with her, on this narrow point, he's not for the Syrian intervention, don't ask me why.
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 05:01 PM
It is kinda interesting that the Dems all used to say how evil Saddam Hussein was.
Then they had to endlessly dog Bush about Iraq.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhZ2ZvS2t_E
but....
Posted by: Janet --- -... .- -- .- ... ..- -.-. -.- ... | June 15, 2013 at 05:03 PM
Gee, if we had any ground attack capability maybe we could hit Assad like we hit Gaddaffi. Or would the Rooshians intervene?
Now with the S-300's it will take stealth to crack the Syrian air defenses. The other question is who is manning them.
Nothing like dithering. Hundreds of Americans dead in Afghanistan, thousands wounded.
Maybe an American presence in Iraq would have stopped the Iranians from arming Assad.
Turn in any direction and the blame lies clearly at Obama's feet.
Posted by: matt | June 15, 2013 at 05:03 PM
Assad & his wife were highlighted in Vogue as glamorous but he now is just too evil & has to go.
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/01/the-only-remaining-online-copy-of-vogues-asma-al-assad-profile/250753/
The Dems make no sense.
Posted by: Janet --- -... .- -- .- ... ..- -.-. -.- ... | June 15, 2013 at 05:15 PM
Well it's arguable, that Maliki who was exiled in Damascus, for a fair part of his time abroad,
but a military contingent might have influenced the balance of forces there,
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 05:17 PM
matt,
A fool's play is to intervene in Syria. Maybe we should let Argentina send Menem back as a consolation to the regime. I wonder who is watching his vineyard. Damn good wine, by the way. Best Malbec I tasted.
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 05:19 PM
I remarked earlier about Menem, since he was the go between in the Balkan brouhaha, as well some unpleasantmess in the Andes
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 05:22 PM
narc,
I know him. Was with him on the plane looking over airports in Cordoba, Rosario and Bariloche (of course) to modernize. He was a real reformer but got caught up in the typical Argentine corruption crap. Along was Cavallo who became a good contact who I would see in Miami from time to time when we were between flights or conferences.
He never got over losing his son on the chopper.
I cry for Argentina. Who doesn't that has ever lived there?
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 05:36 PM
With Hezbollah now in the fray, it's to little and to late. Which might have been the plan.
If Aleppo falls, Iran runs Syria.
Posted by: not_bubarooni | June 15, 2013 at 05:42 PM
Costas? That's not his older sister?
Posted by: MarkO | June 15, 2013 at 05:47 PM
the administration can point to the talking as a substitute for action. With the Russians involved the administration is powerless.
Posted by: [email protected] | June 15, 2013 at 05:49 PM
Janet-
That has been the odd thing about the whole Arab Spring. Progressives were trying to rehabilitate in the west the second generation of Arab dictators that had graduated from charm school then they all had their knees cut out from under them.
Posted by: [email protected] | June 15, 2013 at 05:57 PM
Viva Rio de la Plata. Viva La Argentina.
Posted by: MarkO | June 15, 2013 at 05:57 PM
I think the detailed attendance will be hidden with the birth certificate and kollidge transcripts: http://twitchy.com/2013/06/15/empty-chair-senate-citizens-demand-names-of-senators-who-skipped-town-before-nsa-briefing/
Posted by: Captain Hate | June 15, 2013 at 06:08 PM
"That struck me as complete BS."
Me too. I can't imagine a "military source" saying any such thing.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | June 15, 2013 at 06:28 PM
look at this - Gang of 8 Amnesty Bill Provides Illegal Aliens Being Deported with Lawyers
http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/gang-of-8-amnesty-bill-provides-illegal-aliens-being-deported-with-lawyers/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=gang-of-8-amnesty-bill-provides-illegal-aliens-being-deported-with-lawyers
So it has perks for lawyers too. Great. We already pay lawyer fees for enviro groups to sue us...
Posted by: Janet --- -... .- -- .- ... ..- -.-. -.- ... | June 15, 2013 at 06:32 PM
If you expand the definition of "military source" to Leon Panetta and Chuck Hagel you can expect to hear just about anything.
Posted by: Ignatz | June 15, 2013 at 06:35 PM
"Names of Senators who skipped"
Who set up a briefing for Friday afternoon?
Clapper has already lied to Congress and I think there is another briefer who hasn't done too well at presenting the truth.
This looks to me like a set-up by the regime to
make the Senate look bad, IMO.
Posted by: pagar | June 15, 2013 at 06:46 PM
Well General Alexander, at least gave the impression he knew something, although some accounts were spotty
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 06:53 PM
My 06:46 said the briefing was Friday, it was Thursday of a week when it was known that most Senators would be going home. Sorry for the confusion.
I think every Senator should be at the briefing but believe this scheduling was bad.
Posted by: pagar | June 15, 2013 at 07:07 PM
Well we can't be surprised they would go there;
Posted by: narciso | June 15, 2013 at 07:21 PM
How many putts can Phil miss?
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 07:28 PM
Nice to see Tiger doing so poorly.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | June 15, 2013 at 07:32 PM
'For the first time, all of America’s ‘friends’ in the region are Sunni Muslims and all of its enemies are Shiites. Breaking all President Barack Obama’s rules of disengagement, the US is now fully engaged on the side of armed groups which include the most extreme Sunni Islamist movements in the Middle East."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/world-exclusive-iran-will-send-4000-troops-to-aid-bashar-alassads-forces-in-syria-8660358.html
Putting all your chips on the House of Saud, just to keep the petrodollar as the medium of exchange.
Posted by: Corn-fed conservative (southern strategy version) | June 15, 2013 at 07:39 PM
As they are now saying in Egypt, "Hey Imam! I'm on top of the world!"
Posted by: matt | June 15, 2013 at 07:42 PM
You're acting like this is some kind of victory attendant with necessary celebration.
Posted by: Corn-fed conservative (southern strategy version) | June 15, 2013 at 07:47 PM
Alas poor Lamberth, I knew him...
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/06/judge-lamberth-grants-leave-of-court-to.html?m=1
Posted by: Threadkiller | June 15, 2013 at 07:51 PM
There oughtta' be a pic of you in the dictionary under the word;
'persistence'.
Posted by: Corn-fed conservative (southern strategy version) | June 15, 2013 at 07:58 PM
"Putting all your chips on the House of Saud, just to keep the petrodollar as the medium of exchange."
This clown would make a good birther.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | June 15, 2013 at 08:16 PM
"This is significant..."
Only the loons at the Birther Report would think it significant that a judge granted leave to file papers. But hell, they think everything else is a "bombshell," so maybe this is just their code for "we need to say something."
Posted by: Danube on iPad | June 15, 2013 at 08:20 PM
Has anyone heard from Hamlet?
Mickelson comes back from 2 down to finish in the lead after round 3 at -1. Only guy under par. Short courses do this to the best players in the world.
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 08:25 PM
Obama played golf today. He doesn't seem too worried...
Posted by: Janet --- -... .- -- .- ... ..- -.-. -.- ... | June 15, 2013 at 08:25 PM
82 days to kickoff.
Posted by: 4Jack is Back!2 | June 15, 2013 at 08:46 PM
Why do so many on the Left and the Right fight so furiously against the likelihood that unlimited collection power and ability, naturally results in some malfeasance?
It's a genuine enigma..
Posted by: Corn-fed conservative (southern strategy version) | June 15, 2013 at 08:46 PM
It is significant enough to elicit a response apparently.
Posted by: Threadkiller | June 15, 2013 at 08:47 PM