A straw in the wind suggesting that Republicans are winning, or at least not losing, the debt limit scuffle is provided by Noam Scheiber ot TNR, who offers this analysis diatribe about the wisdom of Obama's "Just Say 'No' To Negotiation" strategy:
The reason the White House has been so firm in its no-debt-limit negotiation position is that it understands what’s at stake. If Republicans believe they can extract concessions from the president by threatening a debt default (the consequence of not raising the limit), then there’s no end to what they will be able to demand. Elections and the legislative process will become utterly meaningless. A minority party will be able to enact an agenda for which it lacks popular support and sufficient votes in Congress. The only way to prevent this is to make crystal clear that there will be no concessions period, rendering the whole extortion exercise utterly pointless.
The only way to prevent this in the future is to stand firm now? Hmm, the Democratic strategy has been to create a crisis, blame the Republicans, and hope a wave of popular anger enables them to reclaim the House and hold the Senate in 2014. Which, in addition to giving a boost to whatever Obama is passsing off as an agenda, would be a great way to stop this legislative tactic. (Whether that strategy actually made sense at the level of the relevant Congressional districts is debatable.)
Of course, the Treasury could attempt to engage in some ad hoc prioritizing so that interest and principal payments on our public debt are not missed. Since there is no clear legislative authority allowing the Treasury to pick and choose amongst our national obligations it would be a bit of a Mad Hatter's Sequester. But hey, a Democratic Adinistration could simply suspend payments to defense contractors working on weapons systems and $600 toilet seats, right?
This notion of public debt versus all debt, including payments due on government contracts or promised under entitlement programs, is vigorously elided by Obama's backers. Over to Mr. Scheiber, my emphasis:
If Republicans believe they can extract concessions from the president by threatening a debt default (the consequence of not raising the limit), then there’s no end to what they will be able to demand.
That is true only if "debt" is broadly defined to encompass all payments owed by the US Government. But over at the Bureau of Public Debt, they realize that the much-ballyhooed debt limit refers to public indebtedness issued by the Treasury and does not include payments due to Halliburton and General Electric for their fine and public-spirited efforts on government contracts.
If Obama's supporters are losing their arguments and their minds, that suggests the Republicans are hanging in there. My two cents: Obama's "I won't negotiate because they are being unreasonable and intransigent" pose won't hold as the public begins to see Obama as unreasonable and intransigent. I just don't see "I'm crazier than they are" as a winning play.
37 approval? a reflection of apolitical people's disgust with the inability to do a budget and the petty shutdown of National Parks. When these short term issues are settled, and the issues remmain the Debt crush and the ObummerCare disaster, and there are no jobs being created, and $4+ gas is back due to QE Infinity under Yellen Obummer's approval in 2014 will average about 40% IMO. Lucky Congressional Dems get to run in 14 with that.
Posted by: NK(tryin'2.0) | October 09, 2013 at 09:30 AM
Re: the music discussion. Hubby is a drummer,he played in local bands in northern Maine for years. He just read Ginger Baker's bio,"Hellraiser". What a character! He said he went deaf because Jack Bruce played too loud and he used to yell at Clapton to turn it down. All the drummers are hubby's heroes,even Ringo :) He favors Bonham the most.
Posted by: Marlene | October 09, 2013 at 09:30 AM
From the bizarre file!
http://pjmedia.com/blog/debt-limit-huh-unfunded-liabilities-dwarf-16-7-trillion-ceiling/?utm_medium=twitter
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/10/spendaholics-dingy-harry-wants-1-1-trillion-debt-limit-increase/
I believe the leftists are determined to destroy the USA.
Posted by: pagaragain | October 09, 2013 at 09:32 AM
NK, it's not begrudging. It's distrust of the journalists in question.
DrK has been wobbly lately, Parker is a bad joke, and Costa's recent work speaks for itself.
ALso, as the POTUS, he is, after all, our employee, and being available to the media and answering questions is a part of his job.
The fact that Zero treats any access to himself as a privilidge to be doled out only to those who are properly obedient is itself a part of the problem, and journalists who actually believed in the things they claim to would be saying that.
Posted by: James D. | October 09, 2013 at 09:35 AM
Meanwhile, the new Libyan PM, more tightly tied to the Brotherhood, says al Libi should be tried at home, 'heck of a job'
Posted by: narciso | October 09, 2013 at 09:37 AM
"The only one I trust out of that bunch is Byron York. I wonder why he was invited."
http://thepatriotperspective.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/byron-york-and-birth-certificates/
Obama trusts him more...
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 09, 2013 at 09:38 AM
"People here begrudge professional journalists/bloviators the opportunity to meet with with the POTUS? I don't get that."
Journalists are supposed to be the conduits of news and information. What could such a meeting possibly accomplish? When I worked at a quasi-public institution the PR office used to say that there was no such thing as an "off-the-record" discussion with a journalist, it's a contradiction in terms. These guys are letting themselves be used by POTUS.
Or as David Burge puts it:
@iowahawk
What do you call a reporter who meets with a president off-the-record?
I don't know, but not "reporter."
Posted by: jimmyk on iPad | October 09, 2013 at 09:38 AM
Hear, hear, James D!
Posted by: centralcal | October 09, 2013 at 09:40 AM
Judge 'journalists' by their work product, not who they choose to interview or meet with. Unlike Leftists I don't choose to view journalists as being on 'my team' or 'the enemy'. Yes Obummer is a narcissist illiterate moron who doesn't take legitimate questions, and he is a propagandist. Shame on him. If these journalists aid and abet Obummer's paropaganda, shame on them and slam them. Criticizing them for accepting a POTUS invite is sour grapes prejudging IMO.
Posted by: NK(tryin'2.0) | October 09, 2013 at 09:40 AM
How much money is being lost because the park service has shut down the concessionaires? The restaurants,motels,campgrounds and cabins?
Posted by: Marlene | October 09, 2013 at 09:41 AM
herein lies the point, the access seems to condition the coverage, on one side, on the other side, hte repeat 'the two minute' dirge of discouragement,
Posted by: narciso | October 09, 2013 at 09:44 AM
Ask yourself why President Pantload doesn't interact more with these "conservatives"? Is it a coincidence that his approval polling is in the toilet?
Posted by: Captain Hate on the iPhone | October 09, 2013 at 09:47 AM
TomM-- to cheer your day, here's a short sweet summary of 3 years of Malloyism in all Blue CT. Everyone else can read it and rejoice they don't live in a Blue Hell: http://darien.patch.com/groups/elections/p/boucher-malloy-is-blaming-connecticuts-troubles-on-everyone-else-darien
Posted by: NK(tryin'2.0) | October 09, 2013 at 09:50 AM
Byron York this morning regarding the Obama invitation via a series of tweets:
Byron York @ByronYork 2h
To interested tweeps: Yes, I was at WH meeting Tuesday with President Obama. I agreed beforehand that content would be off the record…
It was good meeting; really helped me better understand WH perspective on current matters…
As far as OTR is concerned, on Monday I had long talk with a leader of the defund Obamacare effort, combo background and off-the-record…
I understand the suspicions, but in my experience these meetings do not involve exchange of any secrets; rather, they are way…
…for officials to expand and explain their positions in little more open way that allows me to better understand what is going on.
Finally, I was impressed Obama invited conservative journalists in. He didn't have to, but he did, and I thought that was a good thing.
--------
He was "impressed" that his royal highness, the great and mighty emperor did a "good thing" and allowed him/them in before his
presence to "explain their positions" so that he can "better understand".....
omg
Posted by: centralcal | October 09, 2013 at 09:50 AM
Back fro my morning school volunteer session. (I coach the spelling team for the Purdue Spell Bowl. Pay no attention to my typos.)
Interesting interview on radio, head of a major party in Tanzania and possible new president after the next election. He said the country was pulling out of socialism and that Tanzania is open for business. They are going to use their immense mineral and natural resource wealth to pull the company out of poverty.
Starbucks gets their coffee from them. I also know they have gold, uranium, and tanzanite, plus they have just discovered large deposits of natural gas.
I found it interesting that he spoke of mining and natural gas extraction as a way to improve his country's economy, while here in the bizarro United States, our government is shutting such things down.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 09, 2013 at 09:51 AM
No one simply meets with Obama. Each is "summoned" or "called" to his presence.
Posted by: MarkO | October 09, 2013 at 09:51 AM
No drummer love for Jim Keltner?
Posted by: AliceH | October 09, 2013 at 09:53 AM
These "reporters" are to journalists as rhyme sayers are to poets.
Posted by: MarkO | October 09, 2013 at 09:53 AM
MissM thanks for the Tanzania info. Last week I learned I should buy Barilla pasta for life (no Homo marriage couples in their adverts) now I know to buy Tanzania souced coffee beans.
Posted by: NK(tryin'2.0) | October 09, 2013 at 09:54 AM
"Someone with a smidgeon of administrative competence could weather the storm without the disastrous effects we see. "
Except that this vicious, petty asshole deliberately cherry-picked the closures that would most inconvenience the citizenry, instead of attempting to do just the opposite.. Thus Camp David stays open while funds are expended to close off open spaces. Thus Obama's golf course stays open while Mt. Rushmore s screened off.
Over time, people catch on.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | October 09, 2013 at 09:54 AM
Cap'n,
Ringo is tremendous. He does not get enough credit for his playing (neither does McCartney). Listen to "Ticket to Ride," how he changes the part around seamlessly. Goofy but great.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 09, 2013 at 09:55 AM
CAMEL: Uh-oh! Guess what day it is?? Guess what day it is! Huh…anybody? Julie! Hey…guess what day it is?? Ah come on, I know you can hear me. Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike… What day is it Mike? Ha ha ha ha ha ha! Leslie, guess what today is?
LESLIE: ::sighs:: It's Hump Day...
CAMEL: NO!!!! It's TK's Birthday. Whoot Whoot!
::cut to guitar players::
Ronny, how happy are folks who get to celebrate TK's birthday?
RONNY: I’d say happier than a camel on Wednesday.
********************
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TK!!!
********************
Oh, and look what I found:
I have my suspicions it is forged.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | October 09, 2013 at 09:59 AM
"Smokey the Stassi"
was Rick.
Of course.
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 09, 2013 at 10:00 AM
A very happy B-Day to TK.
Posted by: NK(tryin'2.0) | October 09, 2013 at 10:00 AM
I dropped Byron York from my twitter feed a few days ago. He's been going wobbly for a while. I suspect BOzo brought in these "conservative" journolists so he could pull back the curtain on what he and Soros et al could do to the country and the economy if he doesn't get his way, and get their help getting his way. Same thing he has done with McCain (Superman in his own mind - if we only knew) to get McCain to whore for him.
Byron, if you're paying attention - don't do it. Let the petulant little pissant do his worst. The results will blow his and Reids puny minds.
Posted by: *Bill in AZ* | October 09, 2013 at 10:03 AM
HB TK!
Posted by: henry | October 09, 2013 at 10:03 AM
Whoa. Happy Birthday TK. Now I know why DoT left the country.
Have a great day. Surf's up.
Posted by: MarkO | October 09, 2013 at 10:09 AM
Remember when McCain suspended his 2008 campaign, Bill?
Same stuff.
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 09, 2013 at 10:10 AM
Thanks for the wishes!
Mamacita TK said she has a "special plan"* for me.
*(for those scoring at home)
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 09, 2013 at 10:13 AM
"Remember when McCain suspended his 2008 campaign, Bill?"
yep - Superman in his own mind - if we only knew what he is having to do all on his own to save us. idiot.
...and Happy Birthday, TK
Posted by: *Bill in AZ* | October 09, 2013 at 10:16 AM
HB
DDTKPosted by: Captain Hate on the iPhone | October 09, 2013 at 10:17 AM
Happy Birthday, TK from Doctor Hugh Kelele
Posted by: its a birther thing | October 09, 2013 at 10:20 AM
We'll have to agree to disagree, Porch; and I've long thought he sounds particularly clunky on "Ticket to Ride". Levon Helm otoh is a percussive marvel with cymbal work that ranks with the best I've heard in any genre.
Posted by: Captain Hate on the iPhone | October 09, 2013 at 10:22 AM
Happy Birthday, TK! Hope it's a great one.
In case anyone is interested in the hard-hitting questions (not) the WH press grilled BOzo with (not):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/transcript-president-obamas-oct-8-news-conference-on-the-shutdown-and-debt-limit/2013/10/08/866088c0-3038-11e3-8906-3daa2bcde110_story_4.html
BOzo and the "reporters" gathered shared a big laugh when he told them to "blame Jay" if they didn't get called on. The winners:
Julie Pace (AP), Julianna Goldman (Bloomberg), Sam Stein (HuffPo), Robert Rampton (Reuters), Ari Shapiro (NPR). Mark Landler (NYT), Richard McGregor (The Australian), Steven Dennis (Roll Call), Mark Knoller (CLS), Stephen Kalitz (unknown), and Unnamed Person in front row who threw the last softball to BOzo.
Posted by: DebinNC | October 09, 2013 at 10:23 AM
"Judge 'journalists' by their work product, not who they choose to interview or meet with. "
No, because we can't know what they are NOT reporting. Or at least not always. So we can infer from their behavior that they are trying to maintain "access."
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | October 09, 2013 at 10:23 AM
It also occurs to me that Obama probably STILL has those behavioral psychology experts on his payroll and is carefully drawing in people like Byron York to isolate and disarm them.
Notice how he didn't pull in someone like Thomas Sowell. Nope. He chose squishy people like Parker and Gigot with York drawn in to feel like he was odd man out of the "reasonable" group.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 09, 2013 at 10:25 AM
Happy birthday, TK!
Posted by: James D. | October 09, 2013 at 10:27 AM
Miss Marple, you are a wonderful new addition. Very insightful re York.
Posted by: DebinNC | October 09, 2013 at 10:28 AM
Until President Pantload goes toe to toe with Mark Levin and Tammy Bruce, he's afraid to interact with conservatives.
Posted by: Captain Hate on the iPhone | October 09, 2013 at 10:31 AM
Over time, people catch on.
DoT,
I think Obama's spiteful heavy hand in all this thuggery is the best advertisement - and by active counterpoint, no less - for conservative-libertarian limited government in the US that I've ever seen. I think a paraphrase of Virgil praising Dante in a passage of Inferno is apt here, that the best reply to it all is silence and the fact.
Obama tried to lure Boehner and the conservatives into a pitfall trap - from the inside. I'm not sure if this has sunken into Obama or Reid yet.
Posted by: Trevor Saccucci | October 09, 2013 at 10:32 AM
DebinNC, thanks!
I also wonder if this is the explanation (in part) for why the White House press is so subservient. I realize they are all liberals, but it should normally occur to them that some of the things Obama is doing are decidedly UNliberal (drones, Wall Street cronies, sweetheart deals in green energy, etc.).
So why aren't there everany questions about those things? Sometimes I think they have all been hypnotized.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 09, 2013 at 10:33 AM
Happy Birthday, Threadkiller!!!
Posted by: centralcal | October 09, 2013 at 10:40 AM
Happy Birthday, TK, assuming your birth certificate isn't forged or anything.
Posted by: Clarice | October 09, 2013 at 10:41 AM
It's part affinity and part fear imo. The press watched what the DOJ did to James Rosen (FOX) and the IRS did to Dr. Ben Carson and know they're one wrong spoken/printed word from getting the same.
Posted by: DebinNC | October 09, 2013 at 10:42 AM
Happy Birthday,TK!
Posted by: pagaragain | October 09, 2013 at 10:42 AM
Miss Marple, they sold all of us on President Historic First being the greatest thing evarrr and any deviation from that means they lose their smarty pants status and don't get to sit with the cool kids.
Posted by: Captain Hate on the iPhone | October 09, 2013 at 10:44 AM
HB TK!
Posted by: Extraneus | October 09, 2013 at 10:45 AM
Suffer from kidney disease? improve your kidney health naturally
click this site https://twitter.com/soniaw17/status/379366515411144705
Posted by: click this site | October 09, 2013 at 10:45 AM
... new thread ...
Posted by: DebinNC | October 09, 2013 at 10:55 AM
Happy Birthday, TK. Lots of love to you!!
Posted by: Janet | October 09, 2013 at 12:47 PM
I'll be darned if anyone is going to corral me into a new thread.
. . . Hello?
. . . . . Hello?
Posted by: sbwaters | October 09, 2013 at 02:11 PM