Obama is delaying the enrollment for next year's individual health insurance debacle until after the election. The motivation fools no one - here is CNN:
White House: Politics aren't pushing back start date of 2015 Obamacare enrollment
By Kevin Bohn and Ben Brumfield, CNN
Washington (CNN) -- White House spokesman Jay Carney denied Friday that next year's midterm elections are the reason behind the administration's decision to postpone the 2014 opening date for 2015 enrollment in Obamacare -- from October 15 to November 15.
Pushing back the start date, Carney said, will give insurers more time to get an idea of their new pool of customers before they set their 2015 rates.
Some critics, including Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said that the move was simply a political ploy and that any changes to health care plans, such as premium increases, for example, should be public before the election.
As Sen. Grassley surely knows, proposed premium changes will be public - the insurance companies file proposed plans with the state insurance commissioners over the summer and new rates are approved (or not.) (Cf this release from the HHS ASPE in July 2013 touting premiums that were "lower than expected" for the plans that went public on Oct. 1.)
Now it may be that some states, particularly with Democratic governors, aid Team Obama's attemt to play 'hide the ball'. However, most state data ought to be available before the election.
And an enterprising Republican attack dog with a bit of funding could set up a very simple website that let people input their state and family status and get back the proposed pricing for plans in their state, pre-subsidy.
The website would not be attempting to estimate, or especially, confirm people's eligibility for subsidies so there would be no need for Social Security numbers, secure access to the IRS database, or secure storage of customer data. Similarly, no reporting/reconciliation/payments system or linkage to the insurance vendors would be necessary (although if someone wants to build one we all know a buyer...).
It always seems simple, especially when someone else is tasked with delivering. But this website should be a simple database look-up, after someone does the work of compiling insurance filings from fifty-seven (or fewer) states.
Roll it out in October and let the press and the public marvel at the new unsubsidized prices. And build or link in a subsidy estimator if that seems politically helpful.
Eleven months. Time's a-wastin'.
THAT'S NOT A BUG, THAT'S A SHOUT-OUT: If the glorious RNC website crashes they should make sure their crash message says something like "You Have Now Activated The HealthCare.fail Emulator".
DON'T DREAM IT, BE IT... There is nothing as powerful as an idea whose time came weeks ago.
It's off topic but you'll be happy to know your favorite charity Wal-Mart is encouraging employees to donate canned food to OTHER WM associates might enjoy some Holiday cheer.
Humbugs everywhere want you to share from your abundance.
Posted by: whitehat | November 23, 2013 at 09:33 AM
whitehat, You make no sense.
Posted by: polly | November 23, 2013 at 10:11 AM
RNC? That is more a whacko bird op, just like the Walker Recall petition online db.
Posted by: henry | November 23, 2013 at 10:21 AM
This would be simple to do. I'd recommend adding the insurance companies and phone numbers, too. Then ask why a gov't website is needed at all.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 23, 2013 at 10:22 AM
--proposed premium changes will be public --
I keep seeing this, but it wasn't true this year. Did anyone see anything before October 1? I don't mean rumors or projections or predictions - I mean the actual rates by plan.
In Missouri, they didn't even release the names of the Insurance Companies who were participating until one or two days before enrollment began.
Republicans can still campaign on rate increase possibilities, networks getting even smaller, and what not - but I truly don't know that the actual State-regulator-approved rates-by-plan will be available before the election.
Posted by: AliceH | November 23, 2013 at 10:30 AM
Anyone know where to download the Bronze, Silver, Gold and Platinum data by zip code? If so, I'll look into setting this up.
(Yeah, sure, like the gov't would allow someone to post such data online.)
Posted by: Extraneus | November 23, 2013 at 10:30 AM
AliceH,
I received my cancellation letter, which included a BOzocare offer at a minimal increase of only 70%, on September 16th. The timing decision by insurers will be gamed and tested by their marketing departments with an eye to relations with the state insurance commissioners. I anticipate later announcements in the stinking Blue Hells than in Free States.
The legislatures in Free States should consider bills requiring insurance commissioner to publish the rate increase requests upon receipt.
Posted by: Account Deleted | November 23, 2013 at 10:40 AM
Rick: the timing of your cancellation letter was due to compliance with the 90-days notice regulation. Apparently, my state doesn't have that long a lead time. I got my not-really-a-cancellation letter requiring me to take one of 3 actions: enroll in new plan by 12/15/13 (7 weeks lead time); enroll in new plan by 2/15/14 (15 weeks lead time), or mail in a policy application -- really a renewal with altered start date -- (2 weeks lead time).
Extraneous: I haven't found actual raw data for download, but if it's anywhere, you'll possibly find it here: http://www.valuepenguin.com/ppaca/exchanges
Posted by: AliceH | November 23, 2013 at 11:05 AM
BTW, when I was working and enrolled in an employers group plan, every year I'd be taking vacation time for at least half if not all the open enrollment period. I'd adjust my vacation plans a week or two earlier or later each year trying to avoid that, but it's like they set the dates for my region (big company - they staged enrollment over 3 months) after finding out when it was least convenient for me. :(
Posted by: AliceH | November 23, 2013 at 11:08 AM
Great Ex. Once you get started let us know what we can do, and where to contribute.
Posted by: Jane-Rebel Alliance1 | November 23, 2013 at 11:14 AM
I don't think anything other than ballpark figures were available at all until quite recently.
CA's site didn't have them and when I talked to my insurance guy just a few days ago he said he could finally get me an actual quote, as of the night before.
Posted by: Ignatz | November 23, 2013 at 11:18 AM
This is the piece I was talking about in the other thread,
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/23/us/politics/tension-and-woes-before-health-website-crash.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all&
So, IBM was one of the contractors, who lost out in the bidding,
Posted by: narciso | November 23, 2013 at 11:28 AM
I have a suggestion that would be both simple and devastatingly effective, and is right out of the Alinsky playbook. Find three or four worst case examples of real people who have been adversely affected because of Obamacare--like the family with a kid who has leukemia and could now die because he's no longer covered under his dad's employer plan. Or the beloved mother of four who has stage three breast cancer and has just lost her doctor. Or the struggling single mom who's working two jobs to make ends meet and who's deductible went from $2,000 to $6,000 dollars a year. Put their sad--and scary--stories into a commercial, with a tag line at the end that says, "On November 15th, 100 million people will be losing their current health insurance plan and their doctors, because of Obamacare. One of them could be you." Then personalize it by naming the incumbent Democrat Senator or Congressman up for re-election who voted for Obamacare. Or, if he wasn't in Congress at the time of the vote, tie him to the fiasco via association with the party who wants to take away your health insurance.
Run it nationally and scare the every loving s**t out of people. Like LBJ's daisy ad.
Posted by: derwill | November 23, 2013 at 11:29 AM
I've got an insurance estimator that calculates for multistate ages 1-85 for multi insurance companies and multi plans already (smoker/nonsmokers, too). Change the tables and company names et voila.
My broker puts it out but I've never bothered yo look 'behind the scenes' to see if the code is accessible. It's written in excel
I can copy it and email if it is to anyone who wants 75% of the work done.
Posted by: Stephanie on kindle armchair QB Statue of Liberty FTW | November 23, 2013 at 11:33 AM
woot! That Penguin site identifies each state's "rating areas". So, now I know for a fact that if I move 10 miles East or 15 miles North I'll be in a "better" health insurance pool. Not that I plan to move anytime soon, but it's a data point to consider.
Posted by: AliceH | November 23, 2013 at 11:34 AM
Yes, this is a total fustercluck, no wonder they were giving us the 'spring surprise' from Whizzo Chocolates.
Posted by: narciso | November 23, 2013 at 11:43 AM
AliceH, My interest would be in whether or not as someone in zone 13 I could use a hospital i Zone 11, which is 1 mile north of me, while the closest hospital in zone 13 is 15 miles south.
This is theoretical as I am on Medicare, but someone should investigate that. For my county it would upset a lot of people if they cannot use the major Indianapolis hospitals and instead had to go south to a second tier hospital.
Posted by: Miss Marple | November 23, 2013 at 11:48 AM
Three guys from a web company in CA have already done this, by zipcode:
thehealthsherpa.com
Posted by: JeanD | November 23, 2013 at 11:50 AM
if you were a Republican attack dog you'd prolly be too busy planning amnesy and attacking the tea party to think about anything else
Posted by: Jojo | November 23, 2013 at 11:52 AM
Good question, Miss Marple. I'm not sure of that - I've had the WORST time trying to get details on what is in/out of network - screens just hang there spinning and it's been doing that every time I've tried for over a month now.
I did just verify my moving 10 miles east would result in my lowest-premium Silver plan premium dropping from $528/mo to $442/mo, and highest priced Silver plan drops from $950/mo to $784/mo.
So, by living in a poor rate area with higher-than-average percent of medicaid/medicare population, I get to pay an extra $1 or $2,000 a year. So I can be poorer, too. Like my neighbors. Sounds about right.
Posted by: AliceH | November 23, 2013 at 12:00 PM
Sarah P. requests we all watch this excellent Cavuto, on Obama's Alinsky Fox-Hate pogrom:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDdmtJCEWPA&feature=youtu.be
Posted by: OldTimer | November 23, 2013 at 12:06 PM
My afternoon includes a student art exhibit which granddaughter is in, so must get ready to leave.
Take good notes, everyone!
Posted by: Miss Marple | November 23, 2013 at 12:07 PM
Wonderful, Miss Marple.
Posted by: narciso | November 23, 2013 at 12:10 PM
Incoming! Instapundit link to the thread...
Posted by: DrJ | November 23, 2013 at 12:12 PM
Extraneous,
You should be able to extract your insurance database interfaces from here: http://www.thehealthsherpa.com/
Posted by: InDC | November 23, 2013 at 12:12 PM
Looks like there's another Insurance Company (the 3rd one) participating in the MO exchange now - it wasn't there a couple weeks ago.
Oh well. Only 751 have enrolled in the state so far, so it's not like a huge number of people were denied the opportunity to see ALL their choices.
Posted by: AliceH | November 23, 2013 at 12:20 PM
I think this delay is a 12-gauge shotgun blast to the instep of the Democratic party. It ensures that every man Jack and woman Jane in America will be focused - laser-like, natch - on the forthcoming rates. And plenty of those rates will leak out, and the rumor mill will grind most fine. The election will be about health insurance premiums. And those premiums, because of 2014's underfunding, will be horrific. Dumb.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 23, 2013 at 12:23 PM
How you feeling, Steph?
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 23, 2013 at 12:24 PM
When you've lost Joe Nocera, you wonder why you cared?
Posted by: narciso | November 23, 2013 at 12:34 PM
This is a great idea. Set up a Kickstarter for the amount of funding it would need. I'd donate.
Posted by: Belial Issimo | November 23, 2013 at 12:36 PM
Instalanche...
So many different ways to pound Democrats on ObamaCare. All they can do is find ways to delay the pain. But it is coming. Delaying it only means it will be worse.
They deserve every bit of the beating coming their way.
Posted by: Army of Davids | November 23, 2013 at 12:45 PM
if you were a Republican attack dog you'd prolly be too busy planning amnesy and attacking the tea party to think about anything else.
Jojo nails it.
Posted by: ChasBrowning | November 23, 2013 at 12:45 PM
Off.
Posted by: DrJ | November 23, 2013 at 12:46 PM
"And those premiums, because of 2014's underfunding, will be horrific."
Perhaps. I can't quite game out what happens if the fat drunkards who constitute a large portion of the marginal income folk with preconditions who are eligible for subsidy decide to wait until health care is as free as their BOzophone before signing up.
The progressive prole killers want the drunken fatsos under the care of Dr. Ezekiel Emengele very badly in order to liquidate them in an orderly fashion but they may not climb on the cattle cars voluntarily. Their refusal would sweeten the poisoned pools and eliminate justification for premium increases.
We're not going to know anything with certainty until after the free rider window of opportunity closes on March 31.
Posted by: Account Deleted | November 23, 2013 at 12:55 PM
Man w/ $5million House (no mortgage), 3 kids in private schools, forced onto medicaid due to "low income". And he's not happy.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/11/22/obamacare-forcing-people-into-medicaid/
In my head, I hear the President saying "You'd think they'd be thanking me. That's what you'd think."
Posted by: AliceH | November 23, 2013 at 01:17 PM
Just heard a rumor that the JEF wasn't getting any of the Seattle commie-progs to cough up $32k for his fundraiser. Price down to $20k.
Hopefully, Jim Miller can confirm.
Stephenie: glad that your ordeal is over. Safe recovery.
Posted by: Man Tran on iPhone | November 23, 2013 at 01:47 PM
Along the same line, why don't the states take over the mass mailing/notification process? Perhaps the governor can propose a reg/issue an order requiring insurers to notify customers of possible upcoming changes. Perhaps the state ins. commissioner can do the same. Perhaps the legislature can require such notices by law.
All in the name of consumer education/public service. TV/Radio/Website campaigns to accompany such consciousness raising, er, informed consent.
Posted by: Conservative58 | November 23, 2013 at 01:52 PM
All indications I've seen thus far are that the fat drunkard oldsters are disproprtionately represented, and the younh sobers aren't showing up that much.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 23, 2013 at 01:55 PM
Man Tran, speaking of ordeals, how are you doing? Is your vision improving? Didn't want to add to your online reading challenges by emailing until you gave an "all clear" to read via computer.
Posted by: centralcal | November 23, 2013 at 01:55 PM
AliceH, anybody on Medicaid better not be happy if htey can chose any other option. Meidcaid doesn't even cover costs of a doctor's time for an evaluation, so physicians willing to participate are few and far between, and the ones who do often limit the number of patients they see, as it essentially charity work with a huge risk.
it's not about greed--it's about keeping the lights on. Complying with all the government regs is expensive.
Posted by: anonamom | November 23, 2013 at 02:11 PM
I do not understand why every White House pronouncement is not met with guffaws and/or derisive laughter.
Posted by: Steve S. | November 23, 2013 at 02:20 PM
I wonder... if one could "accidentally/optimistically" overestimate one's 2014 income to exceed Medicaid levels, buy a policy with subsidies, and then just pau back any subsidies on next year's tax return. Or... overestimate higher so as to not have any subsidies, just pay the premium oneself. Would the IRS or Govt really yank that policy that's been paid for on time and force a Medicaid enrollment by overriding provided income with actual?
One reason this has seized my imagination is that I have no wages, but I have funds. And I will not ever ever ever ever enroll in medicaid. I'd rather be uninsured.
Posted by: AliceH | November 23, 2013 at 02:26 PM
Ccal,
Sat with my laptop yesterday. Can see the keyboard above the bubble, but the mid range on my progressive bifocals is a little off for reading fine print on my hi-res screen. The iPhone is better for JOM and emails, but I really have to get back to project work. (Self imposed alternative to withering in retirement.)
Posted by: Man Tran on iPhone | November 23, 2013 at 02:27 PM
What in the world was the guy with the five million dollar house doing within 100 miles of the obamascare website? Seems weird.
Posted by: MaryD | November 23, 2013 at 02:29 PM
AliceH,
I wonder... if one could "accidentally/optimistically" overestimate one's 2014 income to exceed Medicaid levels...
I'm in this position, and like most government income-related things, they assume everyone draws a salary that is stable. Mine isn't.
If I choose to go with an exchange (and I may not) based on this year's income I would be shoved into Medicaid. OTOH, if one thing works out I would be counted as near-rich and then the exchanges are irrelevant.
And if I'm in between, I can always use SEP deductions and play with corporate earnings to get to where I need to be as far as income goes.
It is crazy that to choose a medical policy you first have to do tax planning.
Posted by: DrJ | November 23, 2013 at 02:36 PM
Man Tran,
Great to hear! And to use a Dilbert line, "Engineers don't idle well" so I'm not surprised you want to get back to project work.
Posted by: DrJ | November 23, 2013 at 02:38 PM
ACA works for "vast majority of people" who have no clue what workable, affordable, reasonable health insurance looks like.
Posted by: AliceH | November 23, 2013 at 02:41 PM
Prayers for you, Manny Tranny. speedy recovery.
rick b @12:55 you put a smile on my face
Posted by: peter | November 23, 2013 at 02:51 PM
Best wishes, Man Tran.
Stephanie, I hope before watching the Mad Hatter eating grass you're tuned into the Bojangles network to watch the traditional ACC rivalry of Pitt at Syracuse.
Posted by: Captain Hate on the iPhone | November 23, 2013 at 03:18 PM
or that powerhouse drama of Duke and Wake Forest...Duke in the lead of the Coastal Division?
good to hear Man Tran and best wishes.
Stephanie, good to see you in the comments.
Posted by: rich@gmu | November 23, 2013 at 03:34 PM
What's the Bojangles network?
Posted by: Ignatz | November 23, 2013 at 04:01 PM
Duke. Clearly we've violated some NCAA rule.
On the question of Boehner jailing someone, submitted for your approval.
Jail? Jail? And who is going to stop something the NYT endorses? The point is not whether it is legal, but whether anyone can get in the way.
New York Times, 2007
This is where inherent contempt comes in. From the Republic’s earliest days, Congress has had the right to hold recalcitrant witnesses in contempt — and even imprison them — all by itself. In 1795, shortly after the Constitution was ratified, the House ordered its sergeant at arms to arrest and detain two men accused of trying to bribe members of Congress. The House held a trial and convicted one of them.
In 1821, the Supreme Court upheld Congress’s right to hold people in contempt and imprison them. Without this power, the court ruled, Congress would “be exposed to every indignity and interruption, that rudeness, caprice, or even conspiracy, may mediate against it.” Later, in a 1927 case arising from the Teapot Dome scandal, the court upheld the Senate’s arrest of the brother of a former attorney general — carried out in Ohio by the deputy sergeant at arms — for ignoring a subpoena to testify.
Posted by: MarkO | November 23, 2013 at 04:07 PM
Bojangles == ACC Network. They always have a Bojangles logo on the game summary.
Posted by: Captain Hate on the iPhone | November 23, 2013 at 04:31 PM
Lots of new user names today! Have they read and initialed the style guide and technical manual, hit?
Posted by: Beasts of England | November 23, 2013 at 04:37 PM
I'm feeling about the same as yesterday, DoT. I was hoping to reduce the happy pills but I made it about 9 hours and took one.
I'm glad MT is doing better. I can't imagine having vision issues. Scary!
CH, I watched the MissSt game on the 'Peachtree' network today.
I refuse to subscribe to those two teams as part of the ACC... And yes, the mad hatter is on my TV now.
Posted by: Stephanie | November 23, 2013 at 04:43 PM
Hey, healthcareNOTgov.com is available!
I think the sheerpa and valuepenguin already got this together, though.
Maybe a name change would interest one of them.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 23, 2013 at 05:04 PM
For my county it would upset a lot of people if they cannot use the major Indianapolis hospitals and instead had to go south to a second tier hospital.
The beauty of ObamaCare Miss M, is that in future they'll all be second tier hospitals.
Posted by: daddy | November 23, 2013 at 05:20 PM
Stephanie, so good to see you posting. Don't worry about taking the happy pills. Your body will let you know when it's tired of them, and you will throw away the leftover ones.
Posted by: MaryD | November 23, 2013 at 05:57 PM
Stephanie,
All I can say is I'm pulling for you like everybody else. Wow. What an ordeal. And I'm also pulling for your hubby who I can certainly understand if he fells like strangling the surgeons.
Posted by: daddy | November 23, 2013 at 06:21 PM
Oregon departs the Top Ten.
ManTran, do you have the teflon buckles on both eyes? Did both detach at the same time? Was trauma involved?
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 23, 2013 at 06:24 PM
BoE:
Lots of new user names today! Have they read and initialed the style guide and technical manual, hit?
What difference, at this point, does it make?
JOMers abuse the style guide with more fervor than Obama does the Constitution.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | November 23, 2013 at 07:13 PM
Thanks Mary and everyone for all the support.
It's not the happy pills themselves so much as the side effect- as my grandmother used to say "I'm strutted "
Posted by: Stephanie on kindle armchair QB Statue of Liberty FTW | November 23, 2013 at 07:28 PM
Yay Stephanie.
You have always been my favorite. Don't tell the others.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | November 23, 2013 at 07:39 PM
DoT,
Don't know about the buckles. My bad eye happened nine years ago with effective loss of vision, because I never bothered to get a fresh lens. (Damage from the laser.) This one was done correctly from the beginning, so it may only accelerate the aging of the lens slightly. Right now, there doesn't seem to be any clouding.
In neither case was trauma involved. Apparently it's a roll of the dice. Found out a friend had the problem in his 30s the same as his father.
On a related note, a buddy who was at NASA Langley in the mid '60s was doing some experiments with one of the very first pulsed lasers and ended up needing some (safety?) eye exam along with his tech. The tech had detached retinas and they fixed him with a laser. Had no idea they were tinkering with medical apps that early.
Posted by: Man Tran on iPhone | November 23, 2013 at 07:47 PM
On good authority I understand Obama personally put pressure on Dems to vote for the nuclear option because he wants to dump Sebelius and is afraid of protracted confirmation hearings and inquiry into Obamacare.Time to put full pressure on vulnerable Dem Senators to vote against dubious nominees like Pillard and = against procedures and executive appointments which amount to tyranny.Countervailing squeeze is needed.
Posted by: clarice | November 23, 2013 at 10:08 PM
I think I saw that in the Journal, Clarice, along with Mel Watt, meanwhile, we were too enthusiastic that the French would hold the line,
Posted by: narciso | November 23, 2013 at 10:13 PM
The hits just keep on coming. The Rodent strikes again.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads f/k/a vnjagvet | November 23, 2013 at 10:19 PM
Interesting Clarice, although it seems to me there is a risk to firing Sebelius. Who will he blame?
Posted by: Jane on Ipad hi there NSA | November 23, 2013 at 10:31 PM
There's always Bush, Jane Where there's a will, there's a way.
Posted by: clarice | November 23, 2013 at 11:06 PM
On the road for a week beginning tomorrow. Stay well and Hppy Thanksgiving if I miss you before then.
Posted by: clarice | November 23, 2013 at 11:34 PM
Attack Dog? Surely you jest. Those pussies don't know attack dogs. They're still afraid of looking like meanies. Even if they opposed Dems with the ferocity devoted to Tea Party-ites, they'd still be pussies compared to the Alinsky clones.
Posted by: rascalfair | November 23, 2013 at 11:35 PM
Today's pieces:http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/reid_drops_nuclear_bomb_and_his_party_will_rue_its_fallout.html
Posted by: clarice | November 24, 2013 at 06:50 AM
@ 11:35 p.m. on 11/24/2013:
Now take WEEAL men. They go
on blogs and call those wascally
Wepublicans pussies, anonymously.
Posted by: Atrollpasinthru | November 24, 2013 at 10:41 AM
Hello there, I found your net web site through Google at the same time as looking for a equivalent matter, your internet site arrived up, it appears good. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
veste real madrid http://veste-real-madrid.youaresomebody.org
Posted by: veste real madrid | November 28, 2013 at 03:09 AM
First tour to Italy. That need to be quite fascinating to them. The thought of the knowledge would be extremely unforgettable. The photograph getting could give encourage them too.
ds lite http://ds-lite.youaresomebody.org
Posted by: ds lite | November 28, 2013 at 03:09 AM
Withstand kidney disease? Find out how medical expert treats it with great success all the time
Posted by: find more info | November 29, 2013 at 11:24 PM
While choosing your nursing pajamas, care has marketing campaign taken for more information on grab going to be the appropriate material and circumference and length for more information regarding ensure that you believe comfortable all of which will relax all around the element
Posted by: parajumpers doudoune | November 30, 2013 at 08:14 AM