The First Webmaster exhorts some supporters and offers this reassurance about Healthcare.fail:
“As challenging as this may seem sometimes, as frustrating as HealthCare.gov may be sometimes, we are going to get this done,” Mr. Obama told about 150 volunteers and paid navigators helping in enrollment who had gathered to meet him at Temple Emanu-El here. “We’re on the right side of history.”
The right side of history? History isn't going to fix that code. My goodness, the LOTUS 123 spreadsheet people were on the right side of history, too. Not to mention the folks who brought us the Blackberry.
Let me just offer our leadership a clue from the Tuesday NY Times crossword puzzle:
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/c/cheguevara166469.html#Hc2EuX3yf3lSFdeW.99
The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall.
Put another way, that website won't code itself, and I hope Barry and Kathy aren't sitting around waiting for history to code it for them.
And since you ask, I am sure Obama is as familiar with that "ripe apple" idea as every other NY Times reader - the quote comes from Che Guevara.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/c/cheguevara166469.html#Hc2EuX3yf3lSFdeW.99
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/c/cheguevara166469.html#Hc2EuX3yf3lSFdeW.99
Still basking in the glow of Stanford's dominance of Oregon...
Fun stat - Stanford had more rushing attempts than the Ducks had in rushing yards.
Posted by: Some Guy | November 08, 2013 at 02:45 PM
Happy Birthday, Master and Commander Hate.
Love it, sbw.
Happy birthday Cap'n! May the Hate fest this evening be joyful.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 08, 2013 at 02:52 PM
And rich, give you joy of your test scores.
Great comments today everyone...
Posted by: Porchlight | November 08, 2013 at 02:56 PM
Maybe McConnell would like to explain why he decided to violate the Constitution and relinquish the House's ability to set spending limits. Between him, the JEF and Roberts, the Constitution has gone through the shredder.
Posted by: Captain Hate on the iPhone | November 08, 2013 at 03:01 PM
JiB, I have a 2009 MBP, which has been a great machine. When memory got cheap enough, I took it to 8 GB. When the disk failed, I went a bought a new one at the Staples, installed it, and restored from my Time Machine backup. The battery failed, and I got it replaced under AppleCare. The dvd drive failed, too, but I use it so little that I completely forgot to get it replaced before the AppleCare ran out.
All of our mac laptops have been like that -- we bought 7 MBPs over the summer at work, and I upgraded them to 16GB (Crucial, $127) as soon as they came in. I've gotten really good at getting the screws out and back in so that they are flush and perfect. Like I said, we've swapped disks on a half-dozen 2008 imacs (they burn up after awhile) and that's pretty challenging. The white eMac we tried to change the disk drive on we had to pitch, we don't even try those.
I've heard that the Airs and the Retinas are glued and also screwed in with totally non-standard screws. Some of the "green" organizations are screaming about the machines being environmentally unfriendly, as Apple basically expects you to chuck it in a drawer and buy a new one if it breaks or the battery dies -- like you would with an iPod. While the green I'm mostly worried about is the kind that goes in my wallet, the idea of spending $2,500-$3,500 on a machine that is supposed to be disposable is insane! DrF and I are both on our computers for many hours per day, and a 13-inch monitor is totally inadequate. We run many apps and need 16GB, and you always overpay for memory if you buy it from Apple.
Posted by: cathyf | November 08, 2013 at 03:03 PM
True that, Cap'n. McConnell blew it and does not even realize the damage he has done by his acquiescence to that. What part of "First they came for..." does he not understand.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 08, 2013 at 03:05 PM
I just love it when you Apple people talk dirty, Cathy.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 08, 2013 at 03:07 PM
I've always given McConnell great credit for herding his squishy crew of senators to stick with a party line vote against Zerocare but he now seems unable to follow through on that accomplishment. Not sure if it is institutional myopia or fear losing control of his caucus.
Posted by: mad jack | November 08, 2013 at 03:19 PM
While the green I'm mostly worried about is the kind that goes in my wallet, the idea of spending $2,500-$3,500 on a machine that is supposed to be disposable is insane!
No kidding. I hate Apple. I also hate that Obamacare makes it possible for some people who own insanely expensive Apple devices to receive subsidized health insurance. Basically the government (also known as taxpayers i.e. me) paying for their Apple devices and organic groceries.
Not that some people weren't doing this before Obamacare. Remember the Frosts in Baltimore, with their kids in private school and recently remodeled brownstone? The S-CHIP expansion really was the beginning of it all, just like they said.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 08, 2013 at 03:26 PM
mad jack, I used to defend McConnell as playing a weak hand very well but he lost me this time and it will be difficult to regain squandered trust.
Posted by: Captain Hate on the iPhone | November 08, 2013 at 03:32 PM
My point stands: Supreme Court experience didn't help Bork, and it won't help Cruz.
My real point was that a confirmation for a SC justice and a political campaign are not analogous. The fact that Bork had little choice but to sit there and take it when the murderer of Sharon Kopechne smeared him has little bearing on what might happen in a year-long campaign when the object of smears has ample opportunity to make his case to 150 million voters, not all of whom (in contrast to Senators) have already made up their minds.
Posted by: jimmyk | November 08, 2013 at 03:39 PM
HB CH. I hope he can get back on track because he can be very effective when he's doing the "right" thing.
Posted by: mad jack | November 08, 2013 at 03:45 PM
Whoops! I must find a new shorthand way to refer to Christie. I don't want our cc to be offended!
How about 30,000cc? (A little metric system humor there.)
Posted by: jimmyk | November 08, 2013 at 03:48 PM
Tonto:
Happy Birthday, Captain! I am exactly four days older than you
Did you use to post under a different name?
Posted by: hit and run | November 08, 2013 at 03:49 PM
It certainly has not helped Cruz's public image to have the "establishment" GOP emit vilipidiousness towards him.
Posted by: MarkO | November 08, 2013 at 03:54 PM
CathyF,
Like I said you can take the back off an Air. You need jewelers screw drivers - phillips head - but it is doable. I got mine in June of 2013 since I was having so many problems with the MBP. I upgraded in terms of speed, storage and memory. Cost less than $2K. I always add Apple Care.
Mrs. JiB is an architect, designer and a photographer who now uses a 27" iMac with 64GB of memory. She needs it for her work and to store 3D-CADD outputs.
Porch, I am an unsubsidized Apple user. This was the first time I had a problem with any Apple product - but it was a known issue in Apple community chat rooms so I wasn't surprised that it turned out to be the video card.
Posted by: Jack is Back! to | November 08, 2013 at 03:56 PM
I gotcha, JiB. I just have so many Apple evangelists in my life. Mostly seculars who despise Christian evangelicals but will happily tell you all about the glory of Apple and the resounding sovereignty of Steve Jobs all day long until you want to smack them.
I always add Apple Care.
:) A teaching opportunity for those I described previously who would spend money on iPads and iPhones but not on health insurance...
Posted by: Porchlight | November 08, 2013 at 04:08 PM
I am home, just got done reading comments.
I do not vote as emotionally as some women, but there is a component to it, even if I try not to have it enter the equation.
However, there are plenty of people who vote emotionally, and it isn't all women. Some will vote against a candidate because he reminds them of their obnoxious uncle, or because they had a boss who looked just like him, or because they don't like the wife, on and on.
This is why Bush very smartly went on the Oprah show in 2000. (And made a better impression than Gore.) It is why Obama has his face plastered on all sorts of non-political sites posing with Beyonce: "Look, that guy's cool!"
I don't care what anyone says, a good chunk of Reagan's voters came from people who had seen him on TV. I voted for him because I was horrified by Carter, but I honestly didn't know much about him other than he was the Republican candidate and he couldn't be worse than Carter. (I wasn't doing much but raising children back then.)
All I am saying is that you can have a moderate candidate who will still turn people off, or you can have a conservative who knows how to present himself.
Cruz knows how to argue a point and probably did very well arguing before the Supreme Court. With a lot of LIV's, that and a dime might get you a smidgen of coffee. THEY DON'T CARE.
So, you have to CHARM them.
I realize this is repulsive to most of you, but I really think I am right about this.
Back later. I have to go pick up the dog.
Posted by: Miss Marple | November 08, 2013 at 04:14 PM
As with the 'most electable' argument (as deftly stated previously by jimmyk), this 'must have Q-quotient' argument seems to be more about who does have (enough) vs. who doesn't, and not about the need for SOME of that quality.
Posted by: AliceH | November 08, 2013 at 04:25 PM
"My real point was that a confirmation for a SC justice and a political campaign are not analogous."
My real point was that having argued before the Supreme Court doesn't help in either circumstance (although it is cerrtainly more relevant in a confirmation hearing).
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 08, 2013 at 04:30 PM
"with Cruz, it seems like he'll fight back ..."
And from what I've seen can do so effectively. This is not an "important" quality like executive experience or female attraction ... it is currently indispensable.
Posted by: boris | November 08, 2013 at 04:36 PM
It's not only women and LIVs who are influenced by a candidate's looks, personality and charm, we all are. To claim otherwise is self delusion. Those matters were more important factors in Reagan's electoral success than his policies.
It's why I think Iggy is correct -- that Hillary won't ever be president. No warmth or likeability (unless her Republican opponent scores even lower on those characteristics). She was "inevitable" last time too, we must not forget.
Posted by: (A) nuther Bub | November 08, 2013 at 05:09 PM
"My real point was that having argued before the Supreme Court doesn't help in either circumstance (although it is cerrtainly more relevant in a confirmation hearing)."
Great, since that was not my argument.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | November 08, 2013 at 05:39 PM
Vanity Fair: The Lonely Guy
There's something wrong with Obama, but the author just can't quite figure it out.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2013/11/barack-obama-loner-self-reliant-closed-off
Posted by: Miss Marple | November 08, 2013 at 06:03 PM
James D.
Your 10:23 is very creative for a commercial...but I would maybe add one clip ahead of your scenario:
Announcer: "It’s 3 A.M. and your children are safe and asleep, but there’s a phone in the White House and its ringing…..who do you want answering that phone."
Posted by: sammy small | November 08, 2013 at 06:05 PM
Miss Marple, I got about four paragraphs into the Vanity Fair article, and couldn't take any more. Todd Purdum (sp?)is a slobbering idiot. But we knew that, didn't we?
Posted by: MaryD | November 08, 2013 at 06:20 PM
MaryD,
I read the entire thing. I was struck how Todd was actually describing someone with severe mental issues, but Todd saw him as a sympathetic character.
He is isolated, unable to connect with members of his own party, suspicious of anyone he doesn't know well, uncaring about normal people, disturbed by his parental abandonment, etc. etc.
This is not a person who should be in charge of a Dairy Queen, let alone a president.
He's dangerous. And the press simply wants us to feel sorry for him. It's quite frightening.
Posted by: Miss Marple | November 08, 2013 at 06:26 PM
Happy Birthday, CH!
Posted by: pagar56 | November 08, 2013 at 06:59 PM
30,000cc
think he is closer to 30000 stones...
glad the top men are buttering him up for a run
Posted by: rich@gmu | November 08, 2013 at 08:51 PM
"glad the top men are buttering him up for a run"
Nothing spells GOP success like a Northeastern governor who won't be able to carry his own state in the general.
I wonder if he'll base his GOTV effort in New Jersey or will he go for Illinois?
Posted by: Account Deleted | November 08, 2013 at 09:23 PM
HB Ch - I'm late to the party but hope your day has been fab. You da Capt.!
......
Q factor?
Who is more Q-less than the Goracle or John F'n Kerry?
Posted by: Frau Quatsch | November 08, 2013 at 10:44 PM
Q factor?
Who is more Q-less than the Goracle or John F'n Kerry?
Well, that's just it. They lost. But to answer your question, I think Kerry is the least endowed with Q of those two. Shudder.
I think the Q factor is important. It might be more important for Republicans because they're automatically starting with a media deficit.
However, nominating someone on Q alone is a very risky proposition. Christie as far as I can tell has no principles that would guide him as leader of the country. I believe he loves New Jersey and wants to wrest control of it from the Politburo. But that's about it, and it's just not enough.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 08, 2013 at 11:01 PM
Porch - AFAIR Kerry was wounded by the immediate and consistent hammering at his gaffes, goofiness and arrogance.(It wasn't hard to do.) Perhaps the Dems were overly-confident that they had already demolished Dubya the previous time around.
Posted by: Frau Quatsch | November 08, 2013 at 11:28 PM
Perhaps the Dems were overly-confident that they had already demolished Dubya the previous time around. Yeah, Herr Fartmeister, that's why GW won.
Posted by: Rd | November 09, 2013 at 02:56 PM