The Christmas season must be difficult for Times columnists. Apparently holiday fatigue and excess eggnog lead to bad outcomes. Any column bt Maureen Dowd could be offered as evidence but this latest laugher from David Brooks reveals a man in need of a few weeks away:
Strengthen the Presidency
Right, because libs were so content under Bush and righties are just loving Obama. Not to mention the civil liberties/NSA/drone wars thing that still vexes some on the left. But let's press on:
We’re in a period of reform stagnation. It’s possible that years will go by without the passage of a major piece of legislation. Meanwhile, Washington nearly strangles on a gnat, like this week’s teeny budget compromise.
In the current issue of The American Interest, Francis Fukuyama analyzes this institutional decay. His point is that the original system of checks and balances has morphed into a “vetocracy,” an unworkable machine where many interests can veto reform.
"Reform stagnation" - he says that like its a bad thing.
We learn - tear out the front page! - that the center of power has been captured by the regulatees:
Fukuyama describes what you might call the demotion of Pennsylvania Avenue. Legislative activity could once be understood by what happens at either end of that street. But now power is dispersed among the mass of rentier groups. Members of Congress lead lives they don’t want to lead because they are beholden to the groups. The president is hemmed in by this new industry, interest group capitalism. The unofficial pressure sector dominates the official governing sector. Throw in political polarization and you’ve got a recipe for a government that is more stultified, stagnant and overbearing.
What's next, some old guy warning of a military-industrial complex?
Fortunately, our Mr. Brooks has a solution:
But there is a way out: Make the executive branch more powerful.
He knows you are slack-jawed from thoughts of ObamaCare, but stay with him:
This is a good moment to advocate greater executive branch power because we’ve just seen a monumental example of executive branch incompetence: the botched Obamacare rollout. It’s important to advocate greater executive branch power in a chastened mood. It’s not that the executive branch is trustworthy; it’s just that we’re better off when the presidency is strong than we are when the rentier groups are strong, or when Congress, which is now completely captured by the rentier groups, is strong.
He still knows that some us are slack-jawed. What, we are wondering, about the Tea Party? We can read umpty-bump articles about how the tea Partiers have hijacked the Washington agenda, but just which rentier group has them in their pocket? And speaking of the Washington establishment and a massive lobbying effort, what about about immigration reform?
Mr. Brooks is ready with a riposte, at least on immigration:
Here are the advantages. First, it is possible to mobilize the executive branch to come to policy conclusion on something like immigration reform. It’s nearly impossible for Congress to lead us to a conclusion about anything.
Huh? That hardly explains why all the king's lobbyists and all the king's men can't get immigration reform through Congress.
We are offered a bit of wishful thinking:
Second, executive branch officials are more sheltered from the interest groups than Congressional officials. Third, executive branch officials usually have more specialized knowledge than staffers on Capitol Hill and longer historical memories. Fourth, Congressional deliberations, to the extent they exist at all, are rooted in rigid political frameworks. Some agencies, especially places like the Office of Management and Budget, are reasonably removed from excessive partisanship. Fifth, executive branch officials, if they were liberated from rigid Congressional strictures, would have more discretion to respond to their screw-ups, like the Obamacare implementation.
To be fair, by "executuve branch" I am sure he does not mean "White House"; the column opened with a visit to the Congressional Budget Office. However, the wishful thinking is in believing that the OMB should be more imortant because it is (somewhat) non-partisan. Here in reality, that reverses cause and effect - if it were important, the OMB would have been re-staffed. Sort of like the non-partisam Justice Department under Holder.
A full departure from reality occurs here:
Finally, the nation can take it out on a president’s party when a president’s laws don’t work. That doesn’t happen in Congressional elections, where most have safe seats.
Uh huh. Is Mr. Brooks even aware of the IRS/Tea Party scandal? Taking it out on an incumbent executive is not as easy as it ought to be. And Obamacare has never polled above 50%, yet we can't seem to escape it or its author.
He builds to his comic climax:
So how do you energize the executive? It’s a good idea to be tolerant of executive branch power grabs and to give agencies flexibility. We voters also need to change our voting criteria. It’s not enough to vote for somebody who agrees with your policy preferences. Presidential candidates need to answer two questions. How are you going to build a governing 60 percent majority that will enable you to drive the Washington policy process? What is your experience implementing policies through big organizations?
Thinking all the way back to 2000, I would say that Governor Bush, a "Uniter, not a Divider", answered both of those questions to the satisfaction of a near-majority. And pushed through much of his domestic and international agenda, garnering a nod from Mencken. That said, I don't remember thumbsuckers about the powerless presidency back when Bush's Social Security reform foundered in 2005, although I suppose his failed run at immigration reform may have generated some ruminations about lame ducks and unpopular wars.
Of course, in 2008 Obama seemed to have the answers to just those questions - the greatest thinker and speaker in the history of forever had 60 Senators on his side, an overwhelming House majority, and a nation behind him. Was the resulting Washington drift really a problem of partisanship and lobbying, or was it a center-right nation rejecting a lefty President who dropped his electoral disguise?
Or, as we have learned with HealthCare.fail, maybe the Lightworker is just a light worker.
MORE: AllahPundit is excellent. A snippet:
It’s a rare rentier group that’s so powerful and malevolent that holding it in check is worth gifting new powers to an already increasingly powerful presidency. (Watch Jonathan Turley on that if you haven’t already.) But it’s also typical of the “banal authoritarianism of do-something punditry,” of which Brooks is a leading practitioner, that the idea of gridlock horrifies him more than extending the imbalance of power among the three branches. If only we acquiesced in Obama’s power grabs more than we already do — and we already do, almost entirely! — he might enact immigration reform himself. Which is important because if we’re stuck waiting for John Boehner and the House to do it, we might be waiting … what? Another four, maybe five months? Seems to me if you’re worried about special interests capturing government, you’re better off empowering Congress so that those interests hold each other in check to some extent than you are empowering a single government official who’ll end up serving the particular interests that have captured him.
Our Miss Brooks does Common Core.
Posted by: Brooks' velvet glove in in tatters. | December 13, 2013 at 12:10 PM
"This is a good moment to advocate greater executive branch power because we’ve just seen a monumental example of executive branch incompetence"
Funniest thing I've read this week.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | December 13, 2013 at 12:10 PM
I'd like to put a nice, crisp crease in Brooksy's forehead.
Posted by: Ignatz | December 13, 2013 at 12:11 PM
Here's a thought;
If DC and our scrotumless solons would stop regulating everything under the sun and doling out taxpayer money to everything that moves and many things that don't there wouldn't be nearly so many rentiers seeking rent control.
Posted by: Ignatz | December 13, 2013 at 12:17 PM
In the face of the greatest power grab in our history, Brooks says this? He must be smoking some very high grade weed.
This really is scary. There is a thread running through the Left of complete lawlessness now. The Constitution has no relevance to them except to force the rest of us to do their bidding and accept their twisted morality and ethics.
In the face of all of the facts, these people are moving us towards a Germany 1932 situation.
In fact, the Tea Party is becoming much more relevant. As Boehner derides us he is perfectly willing to allow the clown show to continue on the path to destruction.
The evidence is before our eyes of the economic, political, and moral decline of our country under the rule of Obama.
If you didn't see the news today, the moderate militias in Syria are being crushed by the Salafists. Libya has spun out of control, and Al Q'aeda now controls large swathes of Iraq.
The Iranians pulled out of the Geneva talks this morning because of sanctions enacted against certain individuals and companies violating the embargo on military & nuclear sales. And they have announced a new nuclear plant as well as increasing production of U-235. All since the agreement. If that ain't a great big finger at Kerry and Obama I don't know what is.
Karzai is having a meltdown and we have walked away from our talks in Afghanistan. A Chinese and an American cruiser almost collided in the South China Sea, and I understand that we have de facto accepted the Chinese air defense zone.
Holder and Sebelius are in contempt of Congress and the government, not just the administration is in contempt of not only Congress but of the law.
And Washington holds Main Street in utter contempt. Virginia and South Carolina politicians are talking constitutional convention and I don't know whether to laugh or cry because I see the power structure now as utterly corrupt.
New York is sounding more and more like Moscow in early 1917 and people give them credibility. Sick, sick, sick.
Posted by: matt | December 13, 2013 at 12:38 PM
It seems like Brooks must have lost a bet to Tom Friedman and was required to let TF write a column to be published under Brooks' name. This is more of the "we need an enlightened despot just like China" stuff that Friedman routinely (and monotonously) writes.
At bottom, it is really a rejection of democracy and a return to the notion of an aristocracy. The left, of course, while nominally egalitarian, really wants an elite governing class to be freed up from the desires or votes of the common people because the elite governing class knows better than the people what is good for the people.
You know, the concept that is working out so well in Europe
Posted by: Theo | December 13, 2013 at 12:43 PM
matt-well said. If you had all the materials I have you would see that rejecting the Constitution is precisely what is intended. These are people who believe you gain power to change the rules and close the escape hatches.
Alice--if you are around, this 2 minute tape illustrates what I see all the time now. http://www.nbc29.com/story/24201428/albemarle-schools-maker-spaces-program-gets-national-attention
Not this as an alternative, but this as the new norm for all students. I have to laugh though. The AP Physics teacher bought a go cart disassembled that was to run on biofuel and the class had no clue how to construct it. Eldest brought it home, put it together over weekend, and loaded it onto pick up to bring to school. It really does work well to have the mind and be able to work with ratchets and screwdrivers and read a mechanical blueprint.
Posted by: rse | December 13, 2013 at 12:53 PM
Here's the problem with those solons, regulations and offering subsidies and 'tax breaks' is their stock in trade, it's how they make their living. The problem isn't what they do, the problem is that they and the laws that created them exist in the first place.
Posted by: NK(withnewsoftware) | December 13, 2013 at 12:54 PM
Datechguy: Boehner goes Fawlty.
On of our JOMers should appreciate the reference,
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | December 13, 2013 at 12:55 PM
(One)
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | December 13, 2013 at 12:55 PM
I like this one:
"We need more unified authority. Take power away from the rentier groups who dominate the process. Allow people in those authorities to exercise discretion."
I think we already have those authorities exercising discretion -- at the IRS, processing Tea Party applications for instance.
I used to think it was remarkable that the Times would pay somebody to write this sort of stuff. Long, long time ago.
Posted by: Tom Bowler | December 13, 2013 at 12:55 PM
Alice-here is another example of what is being pushed so hard now. The activity and social interaction become the whole point. http://remakelearning.org/blog/2013/12/11/why-students-need-to-think-like-designers/
Posted by: rse | December 13, 2013 at 12:57 PM
Or this-http://www.wqed.org/education/learninginnovation.php
All three are from just different emails today touting all this as the new purpose of the classroom.
Where will the minds capable of brilliance get nurturing except at home?
Who will recognize the nonsense that our political class has in mind for us before it is too late?
Do we really think China doesn't still take care that its most capable students are still getting solid academics even if it is in state-funded boarding schools? That there finest minds are just doing group projects?
Or are they getting solid math and science to better design next generation missile systems that will be aimed at us or Japan and anyone else whose wealth they want?
Posted by: rse | December 13, 2013 at 01:04 PM
"umpty-bump"?
Jersey, NY, or Connecticut slang?
Posted by: Walter | December 13, 2013 at 01:05 PM
This is a good moment to advocate greater executive branch power because we've just seen a monumental example of executive branch incompetence
I'm so using that in my performance review next week to argue for a raise.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | December 13, 2013 at 01:20 PM
Actually, the Chinese are robbing us blind of our technology and IP. I will believe in the intellectual ascendancy of China when they begin to consistently win Nobel prizes while based in China.
No offense to the Chinese, but the system itself is flawed. Ideological purity comes before scientific inquiry or literary freedom. Rigid systems restrict the ability to create or explore because the very nature of exploration means going beyond rigid boundaries.
RSE, have you done any looking at how students in Europe are taught? It seems that our education establishment is faddist and utterly incompetent.Do they put up with this garbage in Europe?
Posted by: matt | December 13, 2013 at 01:35 PM
Snowfall hits Cairo. First in 100 years. Global warming, I assume. Never explains what caused it to snow 100 years ago.
Posted by: Sue | December 13, 2013 at 01:37 PM
"It’s important to advocate greater executive branch power in a chastened mood."
Is he saying we should give the exec greater power while *we* are chastened or while *the exec* is chastened?
If the former, that makes no sense due to the aforementioned Ocare rollout debacle.
If the latter, right...because the exec will always stay chastened, huh? How chastened was the exec in 2008 (I Won) or 2012? How chastened will the next exec be?
Or is he saying give and take greater power depending on how chastened we/the exec is on any given day? Yeah right, that'll work.
Posted by: les nessman | December 13, 2013 at 01:51 PM
Even for the NYT editorial page, even for Brooks, this is mind-blowingly stupid.
These people really are just begging for a repeat of the Reign of Terror, aren't they?
Posted by: James D. | December 13, 2013 at 01:54 PM
Yes matt.
The Europeans have also fallen for the PISA farce and the Germans remade their K-12 around "doing better on it." UNESCO and the OECD drive ed reform now all over the world in a common direction. The new proposed global acronym is EQuEL-Equitable Quality Education for Lifelong Learning for All. Mark Greenberg's Positive Behavior work is now being pushed hard in Europe and the Middle East as schools set up School Wide Positive Behavior Systems that make behavior not knowledge the point.
UK and the Scandinavians are still the furthest along, but the US, Canada, Australia, Hong Kong, and EU are all pushing comparable themes now.
In Europe, the redo of higher ed is what is driving everyone to chase after grad degrees trying to get leg up. The associated Qualifications Frameworks are in place in Europe but not popular with employers apart from the BBC and public sector. Ed really is the way in quietly to get the same ends that we went to war to prevent in the 20th.
And China is darn pleased about the whole surrender.
Posted by: rse | December 13, 2013 at 01:58 PM
We have even liberal professors and pointy heads alarmed at the extra legal behavior of our current executive and Brooksy, what passes for a "conservative" amongst the poo flinging chimps of the Times, wishes to fix the problem by making such unconstitutional power grabs legal.
In what way does anything this buffoon writes reflect a desire for limited government?
He and his clique of well paid state run courtesans are the ultimate rentiers.
Posted by: Ignatz | December 13, 2013 at 02:09 PM
(didn't see the new thread)
Younger daughter just returned home from college, so I got to have lunch with both of the Beastettes, which is always a treat.
Got the complete rundown and saw all ~500 photos from their NYC trip. Any Manhattan JOMers familiar with ABC Kitchen? Looked and sounded pretty pure.
Posted by: Beasts of England | December 13, 2013 at 02:14 PM
I have to echo Matt, how can any intelligent being witness the last few years and come to Brooks’ conclusion?
It’s unpossible, unless…
…oh yeah, unless you were one of the idiots of “the right” who projected your vision onto the empty vessel and endorsed sending said vessel to reside on Pennsylvania Avenue.
Like leftwing true believers, it’s never the ideology, it’s just never been done right. For Brooks, his hero can’t reach the healer-in-chief heights of his fantasy, so it’s not the incompetent boob, it’s just not being done right yet. If only his hero had more power, then it could be done right.
What a maroon.
Posted by: Some Guy | December 13, 2013 at 02:20 PM
As I read the piece, my minding is thinking; Obama is a clusterfuck, we can't allow him to fail this badly, if we allow him to do what he wants, maybe, maybe he can rectify things.
Which reminds me a conversation with what use to be some liberal friends. Somehow the subject of Obama came about and their went on and on about how if the first Black President fail, how bad it would be for the country.
I tried to remind them how bad was the country as a result of his lack of performance but they we not interested, to them Obama being a success was more important than any damage that Obama would cause.
He was one of them and he was Black, he could not be allowed to fail but if he was freed to do what he wanted the world would be right again.
Posted by: boricuafudd | December 13, 2013 at 02:29 PM
I have never heard the expression "umpty-bump," but have heard, "umpty-ump" and I assume they are the same thing, sort of like eleventy.
Posted by: peter | December 13, 2013 at 02:31 PM
Before expanding its power, let's see whether the executive branch, which has lots of control over Amtrak and is supported in this area by a rentier class that would dearly love the Acela to be on schedule, can make the trains run on time.
Posted by: Tom Veal | December 13, 2013 at 02:31 PM
There is nothing and no one doing anything to stop Obama from doing what he wants right now as it is, and he's still failing miserably.
Posted by: derwill | December 13, 2013 at 02:34 PM
David Brooks has an inflammation in his vagina.
It's the only thing that makes sense.
Posted by: donald | December 13, 2013 at 02:49 PM
"What is your experience implementing policies through big organizations?"
The ideal executive that Brooksie seems to be pining for would appear to be none other than...Mitt Romney. Yet he went overboard for the guy with the sexy pants crease.
Posted by: boatbuilder | December 13, 2013 at 02:50 PM
Apparently, Brooks has never read VO Key's Politics Parties and Pressure Groups last published, I believe, in 1964.
A detailed description of American government politics, as performed formally through parties and supplemented through pressure groups that function to advance the goals of specific groups. Includes sections on pressure groups (chapters 2-6), the party system (chapters 7-11), party structure and procedure (chapters 12-16) party and the electorate (chapters 17-23) and party and the government (chapters 24 and 25). Covers up to the early 1960's.
Anyone who read Key's book would understand that the problems Brooks is describing were well developed more than 50 years ago.
His suggested solutions are perfectly consistent with the views of our friends, Brains of the Northeast headquartered on Eighth Avenue in Manhattan.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads f/k/a vnjagvet | December 13, 2013 at 02:59 PM
“This is a good moment to advocate greater executive branch power because we’ve just seen a monumental example of executive branch incompetence: the botched Obamacare rollout.”
Foolishness this grand had to come from the mouth of Osgood Conklin.
Please, never cite him again for any reason. This is “more cowbell” without the irony.
Posted by: MarkO | December 13, 2013 at 03:00 PM
Correction:
"Brains of the Northeast" should read "Jeeenyusses of the Northeast".
Posted by: Jim Rhoads f/k/a vnjagvet | December 13, 2013 at 03:05 PM
5) Episode 16: “The Hurricane” (Aired: 01/16/53)
Miss Brooks gets the school ready for a hurricane when Walter hears storm warnings on his homemade radio.
I’ve heard from fans of both the TV and radio series that this episode was a highlight for them. Here is another episode that builds to a climax, while letting the audience in on, via radio, the secret that none of the other characters know: the hurricane the announcer is speaking about is actually occurring in Bombay. Conklin leaps around the school yelling, “Tether your elephants!”
_______________
For me, nothing quite shorthands utter idiocy like the phrase, "Tether your elephants."
Posted by: MarkO | December 13, 2013 at 03:13 PM
Brilliant, MarkO.
Posted by: Ignatz | December 13, 2013 at 03:18 PM
Oops, meant to post this here.
Since I linked to Stockman's diatribe on the budget deal, here's another more positive take by another not always reliable source.
http://m.atr.org/article.php?id=8032
Or maybe
http://www.atr.org/article.php?id=8032
He says undoing the future cuts will require legislation, so maybe there's some hope with an R majority in Congress they'll stick.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | December 13, 2013 at 03:18 PM
Was it Gale Gordon or Cale Gordon? (also played on a lot of Lucy sit coms)
Posted by: peter | December 13, 2013 at 03:23 PM
G-ale
Posted by: NK(withnewsoftware) | December 13, 2013 at 03:24 PM
BTW, at the Bing homepage today there is supposed to be a picture of a Great spotted woodpecker and a great tit but the whole thing is a bust for me.
I see the pecker but not the tit.
Am I being a boob?
Posted by: Ignatz | December 13, 2013 at 03:24 PM
Iggy,
I think I pulled my spleen on that one.
Posted by: MarkO | December 13, 2013 at 03:31 PM
BoE-- glad to hear your Beastettes had a safe and fun journey to NYC.
Posted by: NK(withnewsoftware) | December 13, 2013 at 03:38 PM
MarkO,
When I was 10 years old I had big crush on Even Arden. Being taught exclusively by nuns it became my dream and desire to get a teacher like Our Miss Brooks. Of course, I also became a lifelong enemy of Richard Crenna:)
Gale Gordon had a hellva career as a cantankerous, curmudgeon first as Conklin then on I Love Lucy.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | December 13, 2013 at 03:39 PM
For those scoring at home, Guide Dogs of America is widening its lead over Americares.
This should not be.
Remember, voting is easier than commenting at JOM. Well, except for the whole captcha thing.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | December 13, 2013 at 03:40 PM
some of my friends in the policy universe are welcoming the impending "crackdown" on the tea Party.
All of the data I wrote up above is open source. The IRS is now codifying witch hunts of the government's opponents by reverse engineering them. The aggregation of undue powers by the Administration is well documented. the ill use of those powers is also well documented.
And yet these fools still opt for the groupthink that exists in Washington. There is no wonder our foreign policy is completely botched. There is no wonder that Obamacare is a train wreck. There is no wonder that the DOJ has been waging war on political opponents. There is no wonder that the NSA and the intelligence community have clearly violated the right to privacy enshrined in the Constitution.
And yet all we get is crickets on the important stuff and the demonization of the Tea Party.
They actively support the wars on Angle and O'Donnell and Akin and ignore Fauxcohantas and Patty Murray and the useful idiots of the CBC. I am not defending any of the three, but there are millions out there who take the Constitution and fiscal responsibility seriously.
They take a man like Ted Cruz and demonize him despite the fact that he is in fact one of the smartest guys in the room. And this is our side?
Someone needs to dump a bucket of cold water on these fools.
Posted by: matt | December 13, 2013 at 03:41 PM
What schoolboy did not love Our Miss Brooks?
I always thought Gordon's timing and delivery were impeccable.
If you didn't see the "Tether" episode, I'm sure you can hear him yelling. Then, he realizes what he's said and repeats it slowly, with the dawning knowledge that he's been a fool. You've seen the bit with different words.
Posted by: MarkO | December 13, 2013 at 03:44 PM
TM< one of your finest.
Posted by: clarice | December 13, 2013 at 03:54 PM
Someone needs to dump a bucket of cold water on these fools.
I can think of other things I'd rather dump on them...
Posted by: James D. | December 13, 2013 at 03:57 PM
I would vote all day if it weren't for captcha. I can't read it.
Posted by: Sue | December 13, 2013 at 03:59 PM
I tried 5 different times and gave up. Sorry.
Posted by: Sue | December 13, 2013 at 04:00 PM
For DoT:)
Posted by: 2Jack is Back4! | December 13, 2013 at 04:04 PM
Gale Gordon always reminded me of Fred Clark
who played the doctor who was always tangling with Granny on the Beverly Hillbillies and was a grouch on about a 100 other shows and movies.
Born a stone's throw from where DocJ lives.
Posted by: Ignatz | December 13, 2013 at 04:04 PM
TyphusPad is f**ked up again. Had to change my handle, email and link. I think its their annual Christmas party.
Posted by: 2Jack is Back4! | December 13, 2013 at 04:05 PM
Ignatz-- Fred Clark was also the Banker- Trustee for the ward in the Auntie Mame movie. When he's having it out with Mame after she busts up the ward's engagemet to the nice (snobby) New Canaan Ct girl, Mame shouts at the banker that he wants to turn her ward into:
"An Aryan from Darien!!!"
I watched that file my first Sunday evening living in my Darien house, moments after the line was uttered on TCM Movies, Steve Miller calls me, yes future IRS Commish Miller, who says:
"What have you done?"
Posted by: NK(withnewsoftware) | December 13, 2013 at 04:11 PM
You are simply enjoying "the Typepad comment impediment".
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | December 13, 2013 at 04:14 PM
Typepad has merely put you in the Fa Queue.
Posted by: MarkO | December 13, 2013 at 04:16 PM
Well the category error was there with Fukuyama,
and then Brooks went turtles all the way down,
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 04:21 PM
iggy @ 4:04; Richard Deacon also fit right in with those two. (Lumpy's father on Leave it to Beaver)
Posted by: peter | December 13, 2013 at 04:30 PM
Breaking - Benghazigate Update: State Department ordered Benghazi security firm not to talk to media
http://commoncts.blogspot.com/2013/12/breaking-benghazigate-update-state.html
Posted by: Steve | December 13, 2013 at 04:38 PM
Some more sophisticated philosophizing, and some keen sophistry;
http://www.theimaginativeconservative.org/2013/12/us-constitution-mis-correcting-montesquieu.html#li-comment-68148
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 04:46 PM
Sue: The first time I tried voting (a couple days ago, now) I discovered I was typing in the wrong captcha! The grey box to the left contains a word, the white box to the right is a numerical sequence. I was stupidly typing the word in the grey box! Finally, the light bulb (dim though it is) went off and I have been successful ever since.
Posted by: centralcal | December 13, 2013 at 05:02 PM
Even the Chinese know they can roll Barry
And its dangerous. Our first "punk president".
Posted by: 2Jack is Back4! | December 13, 2013 at 05:08 PM
Eh, Steve, not much to that report; SOP for USG contractors to typically not/NOT talk about their performance when under contract.
Typical to when something gets AFU that nobody talks, whether USG agency/department or in private enterprise.
The bigger scandal is why Blue Mountain was ever contracted to begin with, the terms of that contract, and the mechanism through which that contract was awarded (seemingly sole-source to a company with no past performance, no history, no compliance with industry best practices, etcetera...)
Posted by: Sandy FriDaze 131213 | December 13, 2013 at 05:11 PM
Typepad has merely put you in the Fa Queue.
lol
Posted by: Extraneus | December 13, 2013 at 05:22 PM
Milan orders removal of naughty Christmas tree
Here it is, denuded of it's pleasure objects. (Couldn't find a before pic.)Posted by: Extraneus | December 13, 2013 at 05:28 PM
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | December 13, 2013 at 05:36 PM
s
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | December 13, 2013 at 05:36 PM
NK-in your honor someone really needs to load up a link to "We Need a Little Christmas." I used to sing that with my kids when they were at the toddler stage and I was tired of being Home Alone with them all day.
And the nasal accent of the Darien girl is a hoot. And the actress who plays poor Agnes who decides to "live" one night.
Posted by: rse | December 13, 2013 at 05:51 PM
"If we only had more right-thinking conservatives like David Brooks."
-- stuff NYT readers dream about in their footie pajamas
Posted by: Extraneus | December 13, 2013 at 05:56 PM
surprising how many fell for this scam, they pulled;
http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/12/sarah-palin-moves-to-dismiss-copyright-suit-over-ground-zero-firefighter-photo/#comments
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 06:03 PM
The Darien family in Auntie had a really funny name, that I think was used as an innocuous double-entendre. I'm having a senior moment and can't remember it. Help!
Posted by: MaryD | December 13, 2013 at 06:04 PM
Note all the caveats;
http://cjonline.com/news/2013-12-13/plot-bomb-wichita-airport-thwarted
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 06:08 PM
Surprising this hasn't seen more of a public airing;
http://therightscoop.com/report-morsis-wife-outs-hillary-clinton/
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 06:10 PM
If Carlos Slim told us it was sunny out, we'd take a second opinion,
http://www.longwarjournal.org/threat-matrix/archives/2013/12/does_the_islamic_front_battle.php\
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 06:18 PM
David Brooks fell in love with a well pressed pair of pants.
Of course David Brooks is a doody head as well.
Move along, no signs of intelligent life in that column. Nothing to see there.
Posted by: Comanche Voter | December 13, 2013 at 06:25 PM
Well the purpose of a Brooks column, is the proper glee at it's derision, although this particular dispatch from Omicron Persei 8 is extra quixotic
http://twitchy.com/2013/12/13/slam-greg-gutfeld-puts-media-matters-declaration-of-victory-over-fox-news-into-perspective/
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 06:27 PM
Wise men won't be out tonight in Jerusalem!
http://www.jpost.com/National-News/Jerusalem-Municipality-Second-storm-3-times-size-of-last-one-forecast-to-hit-capital-in-hours-334927?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Posted by: pagar202 | December 13, 2013 at 06:30 PM
Taranto points this Kafkaesque item in Pravda facts;
We're not making this up. PolitiFact actually rated Obama's promise as "true" on the ground that in making the promise, he was making the promise.
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 06:33 PM
There's also this bit from Carlos Slim;
It is an uncomfortable position for many members of the creative classes to be in. "We are the Obama people," said Camille Sweeney, a New York writer and member of the Authors Guild. Her insurance is being canceled, and she is dismayed that neither her pediatrician nor her general practitioner appears to be on the exchange plans. What to do has become a hot topic on Facebook and at dinner parties frequented by her fellow writers and artists.
The punchline is 'I'me for it, but what do we do now;
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 06:42 PM
Bobo should take a backseat to Boner's declaration of war on the Toilet Paper Party. It's a cryin' shame.
Posted by: whiny beatches | December 13, 2013 at 06:43 PM
Note: He's an Obama person, too.
Posted by: Extraneus | December 13, 2013 at 06:48 PM
Those coal driven chariots won't drive themselves;
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/12/13/study-proves-it-was-warmer-in-roman-times-than-today/
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 06:50 PM
Florida orphan who pled for a family will spend Christmas with prospective adoptive parents.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/12/13/florida-orphan-who-pleaded-for-family-to-spend-christmas-with-prospective/
"Only, dressed in a dark suit and borrowed tie, told the packed church that he was seeking a family to call his own. His requirements were simple.
"I'll take anyone," he said. "Old or young, dad or mom, black, white, purple. I don't care. And I would be really appreciative. The best I could be." "
Posted by: Miss Marple | December 13, 2013 at 06:56 PM
Well would he be less logical then Carney,;
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 07:03 PM
PALIN SAYS SHE'LL BE WATCHING......OOOOOOHHHHHHHHH !!!
Posted by: whiny beaches | December 13, 2013 at 07:11 PM
Apparently some weren't.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/mandela-signer-faced-murder-rap-in-2003/
Posted by: pagar202 | December 13, 2013 at 07:15 PM
Chinese naval vessel tries to force U.S. warship to stop in international waters
Posted by: Extraneus | December 13, 2013 at 07:16 PM
'what color is the moon, on your world, Usul' Brooks gives an example of questions. no one is asking.
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 07:19 PM
Good thing you are watching Palin.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 13, 2013 at 07:20 PM
They're obviously itching for a fight.
youtube
Posted by: Extraneus | December 13, 2013 at 07:20 PM
Posted by: Extraneus | December 13, 2013 at 07:28 PM
Why would one watch Palin? Why would it be a good thing to watch Palin? Unless, of course you mean, sans couture..
Posted by: whiny beaches | December 13, 2013 at 07:32 PM
Things are gettin' dicey 'twixt Sino/Amercun relations. Hurry Sundown.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/13/politics/us-china-confrontation/
Posted by: whiny beaches | December 13, 2013 at 07:35 PM
MM,
OMG. What a heartbreaker.
Posted by: Sue | December 13, 2013 at 09:04 PM
A question, that answers itself;
Posted by: narciso, | December 13, 2013 at 09:07 PM
Wow that ωaѕ unusual. I just wrote an incredibly long commen but
after I clicked submit my comment diԁn't show up. Grrrr...
well I'm not wгiting all that over again. Anyways, just wanted to saay excеllent blog!
Posted by: robert sigg | December 19, 2013 at 06:50 AM