Vanity Fair publishes a piece pushing back against some of the Woody Allen support that has passed by this week.
10 Undeniable Facts About the Woody Allen Sexual-Abuse Allegation
By Maureen Orth
7. The Yale-New Haven Hospital Child Sex Abuse Clinic’s finding that Dylan had not been sexually molested, cited repeatedly by Allen’s attorneys, was not accepted as reliable by Judge Wilk, or by the Connecticut state prosecutor who originally commissioned them. The state prosecutor, Frank Maco, engaged the Yale-New Haven team to determine whether Dylan would be able to perceive facts correctly and be able to repeat her story on the witness stand. The panel consisted of two social workers and a pediatrician, Dr. John Leventhal, who signed off on the report but who never saw Dylan or Mia Farrow. No psychologists or psychiatrists were on the panel. The social workers never testified; the hospital team only presented a sworn deposition by Dr. Leventhal, who did not examine Dylan.
All the notes from the report were destroyed. Her confidentiality was then violated, and Allen held a news conference on the steps of Yale University to announce the results of the case. The report concluded Dylan had trouble distinguishing fantasy from reality. (For example, she had told them there were “dead heads” in the attic and called sunset “the magic hour.” In fact, Mia kept wigs from her movies on styrofoam blocks in a trunk in the attic.) The doctor subsequently backed down from his contention.
The Connecticut state police, the state attorney, and Judge Wilk all had serious reservations about the report’s reliability.
And this just in: The NY Times runs Woody Allen's response to Dylan Farrow's open letter. Let me cherry pick this:
The police began their investigation; a possible indictment hung in the balance. I very willingly took a lie-detector test and of course passed because I had nothing to hide. I asked Mia to take one and she wouldn’t.
And back to 10 Undeniable Facts:
3. Allen refused to take a polygraph administered by the Connecticut state police. Instead, he took one from someone hired by his legal team. The Connecticut state police refused to accept the test as evidence. The state attorney, Frank Maco, says that Mia was never asked to take a lie-detector test during the investigation.
Allen leans heavily on the Child Sex Abuser Clinic report to establish his innocence.
And I like this line of reasoning:
Even the venue where the fabricated molestation was supposed to have taken place was poorly chosen but interesting. Mia chose the attic of her country house, a place she should have realized I’d never go to because it is a tiny, cramped, enclosed spot where one can hardly stand up and I’m a major claustrophobe. The one or two times she asked me to come in there to look at something, I did, but quickly had to run out.
One of the 10 Facts is this:
8. Allen changed his story about the attic where the abuse allegedly took place. First, Allen told investigators he had never been in the attic where the alleged abuse took place. After his hair was found on a painting in the attic, he admitted that he might have stuck his head in once or twice. A top investigator concluded that his account was not credible.
To which I will add that an alternative hypothesis is that Allen chose a molestation venue where no one would be likely to look for him.
MORE; Anti-Allen skepticism in Slate, but this is credibility-crushing:
In that segment, Allen tells Kroft that it would have been “illogical” to molest Dylan “at the height of a very bitter, acrimonious custody fight.”
The problem with this line of reasoning is that Dylan Farrow’s allegations did not emerge in the midst of a custody battle. According to Phoebe Hoban’s 1992 New York magazine story, as of early August 1992—eight months after Mia Farrow had discovered Allen’s sexual relationship with her daughter Soon-Yi Previn—Allen had been “prepared to sign a 30-page document that virtually precluded his seeing the children he doted on without a chaperone.” Then, on Aug. 4, 1992, Dylan told her mother that Woody Allen had sexually assaulted her in Mia’s Connecticut home. At that point, Mia and Dylan went to Dylan’s pediatrician, who reported the allegations to authorities.Allen did not sue for custody of Dylan and her two brothers, Moses and Ronan, until Aug. 13, 1992, a week after he was informed of Dylan’s accusations.
Does Slate have editors? If they followed the link provided to the 1992 New York magazine story they will learn that the papers about to be signed in early August were the culmination of many months of negotiation described in the story as including "histrionics worth of a grade-B movie". The subsequent filing of a custody suit was simply the next move in the legal chess match; it hardly indicates that the two sides had been getting along swimmingly beforehand. (bonus laugher, or head-scratcher - part of the negotiation was about whether Mia would appear in Woody's next movie; nice to know she was furious but not that furious.)
That said, the story also includes one of the dumber rhetorical questions I have seen: in commenting on the timing of the alleged incident, an Allen supporter asks "Why would someone on their right mind select the day when they are minutes away from signing papers?". Hmm, so now Woody and Mia are exemplars of mental health and good judgment?
Based on this, Allen looks worse than a Sochi hotel room.
Posted by: henry | February 07, 2014 at 08:44 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8g24ml5cPc
Posted by: Threadkiller | February 07, 2014 at 08:47 PM
Trashy people in love.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | February 07, 2014 at 08:51 PM
All I can say is Dylan Farrow sure lost the lottery the day those two lowlifes picked her name out of the adoption hat.
Hard to see how she wouldn't have been better off in an orphanage til her majority.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 07, 2014 at 08:57 PM
They hired Yglesias and I recall Wiegel, no they don't have editors.
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 08:57 PM
Hell of a hire, Ailes,
http://therightscoop.com/geraldo-to-bill-oreilly-you-stripped-obama-of-his-majesty-by-calling-him-a-community-organizer/
found that treasure yet.
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 09:04 PM
the definition of insanity;
“It’s premature to say it’s over. In my discussions with the leadership offices, what they’re saying is they can’t do it now, they don’t have the votes now,” said John Feehery, president of communications for Quinn Gillespie, a consulting and lobby shop. “Their might be another time when they can get the votes,” said Feehery, a former top House aide. “But we’ve got a debt limit [vote] and this has been a distraction.”…
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 09:08 PM
Boy I wish I knew how to post a pix:
Posted by: Jane-Rebel Alliance1 | February 07, 2014 at 09:18 PM
Trashy people in love, Part Deux:
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Mia-Farrows-Brother-to-Be-Sentenced-for-Sex-Abuse-229522321.html
Posted by: Danube on iPad | February 07, 2014 at 09:18 PM
I could only make it halfway through that clip because Jerry Rivers made no sense even compared to O'Bexter. Maybe he should do porn because that beard makes him look trashier than ever and he obviously has the mindset for it.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 07, 2014 at 09:24 PM
iggy@857ftw!
Posted by: peter | February 07, 2014 at 09:26 PM
Good one Jane!
Posted by: henry | February 07, 2014 at 09:27 PM
http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/02/team-arpaio-drop-bombs-on-white-house.html?m=1
March Loon-ness...
Posted by: Threadkiller | February 07, 2014 at 09:33 PM
Back from Jax and track meet where Frederick ran his mile and finished first in his age group. Bravo Zulu!
Then I come home pour a glas of wine go to JOM and myself back in the Allen-Farrow Sewer System. Is there some redeeming value to this white trash tripe?
Posted by: JiB 4 W8 2 D9 | February 07, 2014 at 09:34 PM
Is there some redeeming value to this white trash tripe?
No. And I didn't read TM's post -- simply, I don't care about these people.
Posted by: DrJ | February 07, 2014 at 09:36 PM
TK, Dresden was reduced to charred rubble by fewer bombs than your links have dropped.
How is it the WH still looks like Dresden circa 1938?
Posted by: Ignatz | February 07, 2014 at 09:38 PM
(For example, she had told them there were “dead heads” in the attic and called sunset “the magic hour.” ...
When I was 7 years old, I called sunset “the magic hour” because that was when my father came home from work and we all did something together as a family.
As far as I remember, I was never molested, but I find a kinship with the "magic hour."
Posted by: Neo | February 07, 2014 at 09:39 PM
Congrats JiB,
now for something completely different;
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 09:40 PM
The "allies" are giving the wrong coordinates?
Posted by: Threadkiller | February 07, 2014 at 09:46 PM
Photographers and movie makers refer to sunrise and sunset as the "magic hour" because the light's just about perfect for dramatic photography. A kid growing up around lots of movie people would probably have heard the term a few times.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | February 07, 2014 at 09:54 PM
"Zullo added that because of the new information and second criminal investigation, there might be 'two events' held in the future to discuss the two topics separately."
These events will be bombshells. The Birther Report has already informed us of countless bombshells dropped by Arpaio and crack investigator Zullo. Thus far none of them has actually exploded but boy, imagine what will happen when they all go off at once. KA-BOOM! End of Obama presidency. All legislation signed bt him is instantly null and void. Stay tuned.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | February 07, 2014 at 09:55 PM
DoT is in.
Posted by: Threadkiller | February 07, 2014 at 09:56 PM
fat lady's warming up, to end this charade;
http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2014/02/07/surprise-another-nj-democrat-suddenly-remembers-something-changes-story-about-christie/
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 10:00 PM
speaking of charafes;
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/kristol-will-pro-israel-community-choose-bipartisanship-over-stopping-iran_778840.html?nopager=1
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 10:04 PM
The "magic hour" as a time around sundown, is a term well known and used by professional photographers. It is not much of a fantasy.
A slut and a pedophile.
Posted by: MarkO | February 07, 2014 at 10:07 PM
Correction, they still have him;
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2014/02/05/cboghazi_journalists_have_no_idea_what_will_matter_in_an_election.html
it must be a ransom of Red Chief thing.
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 10:08 PM
He looks like a child molester. And Mia Farrow looks like Daisy Buchanan..
Posted by: Sue | February 07, 2014 at 10:09 PM
In the montage of Russian history, they've made it through Peter the Great. Will they be singing 'Beasts of England' soon?
(I selfishly ask...)
Posted by: Beasts of England | February 07, 2014 at 10:09 PM
Anyone watching NBC's smooch-a-ganza to Russia tonight? Missing in all the narrative and historical resonance is the 10 million Russian citizens slaughtered by Stalin and his ilk as well as the 30 million who spent their creative years in the Gulag. Thank God a few were able to survive and chronicle it for the rememberance of mankind.
Wonder who lost their library card at NBC?
Posted by: Jim Eagle | February 07, 2014 at 10:12 PM
Watching the Mavs.
Posted by: Sue | February 07, 2014 at 10:13 PM
Watching Five-O on Netflix and soldering some electronics.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | February 07, 2014 at 10:14 PM
Well they did hire Vladimir Pozner for something, so maybe he's their researcher,
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 10:15 PM
which episode now?
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 10:15 PM
"Allen supporter asks "Why would someone on their right mind select the day when they are minutes away from signing papers?".
Because he is sick and HE COULD!!!
Posted by: Bori | February 07, 2014 at 10:18 PM
Who is the guy on NBC doing the commentary on the ceremony? He just said something to the effect he did "soviet propraganda for 4 years of his life", Seems his name is David. Now Williams cuts in to say they are now going to move to WW2 where 20 million were killed by those awful Nazis. Hard to believe such evil could exist, right?
Posted by: Jim Eagle | February 07, 2014 at 10:25 PM
At least on FNC I have seen wholesale ridicule of Costas's hymn to Putin. Don't know how it is being treated elsewhere. But here are the things that occur to me:
--This thing is produced by NBC Sporrts, not NBC News. Did the latter have any vetting authority over what that ludicrous dwarf had to say?
--Did NBC Sports have such authority?
--Does this teeny nincompoop have unfettered license to offer his opinions on gun control, gay rights, Russian statesmanship or anything else about which he suddenly decides we give a shit about what he thinks?
Who is running this show?
I have this faint hope that this disgusting runt will be gently taken by the elbows and led out to pasture.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | February 07, 2014 at 10:26 PM
this is making the Danny Boyle presentation from two years ago, seem coherent,
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 10:30 PM
DoT,
He got a room with a functioning toliet, a door knob and light bulbs.
This is how you lean forward in modern Russia:)
Posted by: Jim Eagle | February 07, 2014 at 10:32 PM
I've been trying to find the second one in the series, it's much more interesting then this day glo pastiche from hell;
http://davidduffybooks.com/Home_Page_KZ6Z.html
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 10:34 PM
Some big guy and Uncle Fester (with hair!) have kidnapped a kid and are holed up in a bunker.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | February 07, 2014 at 10:36 PM
NBC News would have made it less critical of the Soviet Union.
Posted by: Rob Crawford | February 07, 2014 at 10:37 PM
He's doing this lobbying thing a little too enthusiastically;
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 10:42 PM
I can't figure out where they are going. Yesterday Putin was enlightenment personified, tonite he is a scary force to be reckoned with. Or not. I'm not paying close enough attention, but they do seem conflicted.
Posted by: Jane on Ipad | February 07, 2014 at 10:47 PM
Jane,
They are conflicted because the White House is sending them talking points, and Obama says whatever pops into his head at the moment.
Posted by: miss Marple | February 07, 2014 at 10:51 PM
Sounds about right MM.
Kevin Williamson has a great new piece on feminism linked at Insty. I'm on IPad so I can't link it.
Boy that woman looks like Cinderella in that dress,
Posted by: Jane on Ipad | February 07, 2014 at 10:56 PM
For those who have not seen it, here's the racially insensitive photoshop of our prez that the Russian gal lighting the torch sent out on twitter:
Posted by: daddy | February 07, 2014 at 11:00 PM
Gosh, daddy, no president's ever been compared to a monkey before!
Posted by: Rob Crawford | February 07, 2014 at 11:02 PM
BTW, Maria Sharapova was born in Sochi. And in my opinion the most successful professional Russian athlete in the world outsid Alex Ovechin. Won't find them lighting the flame - too capitalistsic.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | February 07, 2014 at 11:09 PM
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/02/winter-olympics-viewers-say-obama-looked-stoned/
Posted by: Threadkiller | February 07, 2014 at 11:11 PM
Is that right;
http://blogs.wsj.com/dailyfix/2014/02/07/maria-sharapova-returns-home-to-sochi/
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 11:15 PM
narc,
My bad, mean't raised in Sochi. Still pretty interesting we have the first winter Olympics in a city with palm trees.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | February 07, 2014 at 11:18 PM
Wow! He clearly looks stoned. He's absolutely gone over the edge. We are witnessing the failure of a narcissist - from which he will never recover.
Posted by: Jane on Ipad | February 07, 2014 at 11:18 PM
Ffffffttt. 'ear...
Posted by: Beasts of England | February 07, 2014 at 11:20 PM
Quiz Time!
One of these is racist and grossly inappropriate. Guess which one?
A)
B)
C)
D)
E)
F)
And the answer is...
Posted by: daddy | February 07, 2014 at 11:24 PM
Beasts...
good grief, hope there isn't another 3 am phone call.
Posted by: rich@gmu | February 07, 2014 at 11:25 PM
Can you imagine the DRUNKEN HAG answering the phone at 3AM?? No, I'm not referring to HUMA.
Posted by: Gus | February 07, 2014 at 11:27 PM
God, how I want to give that freaking Lauer a wedgie next time I see him (which I do when back in Southampton). He is such a wussy boy and absolute left wing no nothing. But it makes him millions. Go figure.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | February 07, 2014 at 11:29 PM
this is the tale that Satter has followed for years,daddy, the russians have long memories
http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-satter043002.asp
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 11:29 PM
Imagine if the MILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLIONS that had their parents, grandparents and families taken away and slaughtered by Stalin et al, demanded REPARATIONS and AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. Does anyone have ANY IDEA how many "lynchings" happened in the U.S.. I do.
Posted by: Gus | February 07, 2014 at 11:30 PM
lol, rich!
Cause I got high!
Ooh, ooh. Back on the Choom Gang...
Posted by: Beasts of England | February 07, 2014 at 11:30 PM
Holy moly, its 11:30 and Ferderick is out like a light and I am watchign that bizarre event from NBC disguised as some Russian thing. I must beg my leave until morrow.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | February 07, 2014 at 11:32 PM
a weak review of his book, by someone we have to know and ignore;
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2003-05-11/entertainment/0305120634_1_david-satter-darkness-at-dawn-russian
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 11:32 PM
Must confess I kind of enjoyed all those pics.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 07, 2014 at 11:34 PM
JiB, Costas IS a functioning Toilet.
Posted by: Gus | February 07, 2014 at 11:41 PM
Boy I wish I knew how to post a pix:
It's easy, Jane.
You start off with one of these < and then immediately behind it you tack on img
Then you skip one space and put in src and you immediately follow that with an = sign immediately followed by a + sign.
Then you paste in all that stuff up in the overhead uhrl section that identifies your picture.
Then immediately behind that you simply put an " then immeidately behind that you put a / and immediately behind that you put a final one of these things >
Then you are done, and voila you have another picture of our Sue:)
Posted by: daddy | February 07, 2014 at 11:46 PM
Daddy,
I'll have to try and decipher that in the morning. I have something on Firefox to do it, but it doesn't seem to want a JPEG in the box,
Posted by: Jane on Ipad | February 07, 2014 at 11:54 PM
I just hope that the aliens who are receiving our NBC Olympics Broadcasts don't decide to do something about it like come here to Earth and destroy us.
Posted by: daddy | February 07, 2014 at 11:55 PM
Back from Jax and track meet where Frederick ran his mile and finished first in his age group.
Great news JiB.
Posted by: daddy | February 07, 2014 at 11:57 PM
Hey Daddy, I was slowly scrolling down. (No perv intended), and as I got to your breastesses pic, I wondered if it had been posted by Ignatz. Then in a nano-second, I realized that Ig, is a buttocks man.
Posted by: Gus | February 07, 2014 at 11:58 PM
Believe what you want. But if you believe Dylan was molested, how come only once? Don't molesters (like Mia's brother John), do it over and over, again?
How come, with John Farrow now in jail serving ten years of a 25 year sentence, there's no sympathy for the two boys who were neighbors to John, and were repeatedly molested.
If Kate Blanchett doesn't get the Oscar, it will go, in all probability to Judi Dench. Where Philomena tells the story of catholic abuse against unmarried teenage women who have babies. And, the babies were sold for lots of money to Americans.
Dunno if Allen's career ahead suffers. Next month he has his play Bullets Over Broadway" opening on Broadway. And, he also has two movies ahead. The one coming out this summer, "Magic in the Moment" ... or some such title. And, Fading Gigolo will open mid-April. (He only acts in that one.)
Now, what if Dylan grew up to be a disturbed adult? Brainwashed by Mia. Wouldn't Allen feel terrible about that?
The story won't go away.
Posted by: Carol.Herman | February 08, 2014 at 12:22 AM
I'm not watching the Olympics. I'm watching Megyn Kelly on replay and it is absolutely excellent. She is going very in depth into the debacle of ObamaCare and every segment between commercials is worse than the previous segment---it's like she's moving down the various layers of Hell. We're at level 6 or so, and I'm scared to see what Level 7 is like when she comes back from the break. Megyn really is consistent in being between very good to excellent almost every night, whereas O'Reilly is still doing a re-hash of his interview and will probably keep up that inanity for another couple weeks. Enough already Bill.
Posted by: daddy | February 08, 2014 at 12:23 AM
Megan Kelly is awesome Daddy.
Posted by: Gus | February 08, 2014 at 12:24 AM
--Then in a nano-second, I realized that Ig, is a buttocks man.--
I'm glad I checked back in to squelch and quash this troubling, if not downright scurrilous, rumor.
I have always believed that, if only for bio-mechanical purposes, a delightfully callipygian backside should be properly counterbalanced by an appropriately proportioned spathic upstairs.
Me like both, equally.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 08, 2014 at 12:34 AM
Of course, Omicron Persei 8 is 1,000 light years away, now Sirius or even Xeta Reticuli B, (the facehugger homeworld) is in the neighborhood,
Posted by: narciso | February 08, 2014 at 12:37 AM
Say what?
Posted by: Ignatz | February 08, 2014 at 12:39 AM
--Then in a nano-second, I realized that Ig, is a buttocks man.--
Gus,
(Via Insty) I think Steven Green just identified that as a problem:)
Posted by: daddy | February 08, 2014 at 12:40 AM
How about the pic at 9;40,
Posted by: narciso | February 08, 2014 at 12:43 AM
Narciso,
If I recall, the Omicronians decided not to destroy us last time was only because they had to hurry back to their planet to catch Leno.
Ai yi yi! Now I'm really scared to death.
Posted by: daddy | February 08, 2014 at 12:44 AM
I'd forgotten about that, what does MarkO say, Doom!!
Posted by: narciso | February 08, 2014 at 12:46 AM
Although some of the scenes depicted were not unlike that of Zoidberg's homeworld,
Posted by: narciso | February 08, 2014 at 12:49 AM
then again, much of the presentation semss slightly off kilter;
Posted by: narciso | February 08, 2014 at 12:53 AM
Me like both, equally.
Whew,
Thats good to hear Iggy, because according to TIME Magazine "The Science is Settled".
Psssst Don't tell Princess Victoria or DoT.
Posted by: daddy | February 08, 2014 at 12:53 AM
DADDY, I hope this reference isn't stupid, but..
SHE BLINDED ME WITH SCIENCE.
Posted by: Gus | February 08, 2014 at 01:08 AM
well higher mathematics, fibonacci sequence, right,
Posted by: narciso | February 08, 2014 at 01:11 AM
I love how everybody here appreciates good math!
Posted by: daddy | February 08, 2014 at 01:29 AM
Just in from the midnight dogwalk and there is a big Northern Lights show going on. It is a fluorescent green color and it's curtains are shifting at a sort of slow waltz speed. Unfortunately the bright half moon in the south is somewhat dampening visibility, but it is definitely from the north as looking up I could see the north star Polaris slowing dimming and brightening as the Borealis played in front of it.
That reminded me of this story a few days back about the unexpected discovery that the North Star itself is getting brighter: The mystery of the North Star: Astronomers baffled to find Polaris is getting BRIGHTER
---Team found that Polaris is 2.5 times brighter today than in 137CE
---Experts say find is 'entirely unexpected'
I don't know how exactly you could use Ptolemy's observations from way back then to help figure out that the star is getting brighter, but The team found that Polaris is 2.5 times brighter today than in Ptolemy's time, which they say is a remarkable rate of change. 'If they are real, these changes are 100 times larger than predicted by current theories of stellar evolution,' says Villanova astronomer Edward Guinan.
I believe that means "The Science isn't Settled".
Posted by: daddy | February 08, 2014 at 04:20 AM
morning all. can't believe everyone is tuckered out.
Posted by: rich@gmu | February 08, 2014 at 05:04 AM
My fellow Terps were having none of this:
I pretty much view Russia as a country the way an Alabama fan must view Maryland football.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 08, 2014 at 06:02 AM
http://deadspin.com/nbc-edits-out-ioc-anti-discrimination-statement-from-op-1518727938?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_twitter&utm_source=deadspin_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 08, 2014 at 06:28 AM
24 mile free fall! As he saw it: GoPro: Red Bull Stratos - The Full Story
http://commoncts.blogspot.com/2014/02/gopro-red-bull-stratos-full-story.html
Posted by: Steve | February 08, 2014 at 07:05 AM
Apparently NBC edited out a huge amount of stuff from the opening ceremonies, including the torch relay film, the mascots, the police choir, and the portion of the IOC president's speech which discussed tolerance.
Crappy coverage and to be expected. The old ABC sports would have done a better job.
Posted by: miss Marple | February 08, 2014 at 07:55 AM
Yikes...
ALMOST ONE IN FOUR 26-YEAR-OLDS STILL LIVE WITH PARENTS
The survey followed 13,000 high school students who were sophomores in 2002, and checked in with them in 2012 to see where are they now. Some of the results are:
10% living with roommate(s), prompting fellow millennial Katy Waldman to write an embarrassing Slate article bearing the headline, "More 27-Year-Olds Live With Parents Than Roommates"
53.8 percent made less than $25,000 from employment in 2011
40% had been unemployed for one or more months since January 2009
13% reported they were neither working for pay nor taking postsecondary courses
60.2 % of those who had enrolled in college, reported they had taken out student loans
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/06/Almost-One-in-Four-26-Year-Olds-Still-Live-with-Parents
Posted by: windansea | February 08, 2014 at 08:01 AM
Morning. Hubby is at the cabin with the carpenter doing chores and I'm here,with the nasty cold hubby had last week.
I've read a few mentions of Obama looking stoned yesterday. I saw a clip of his interview with Lauer and the first thing I thought was,he looks stoned. What time of the day was that interview?
Jack,congrats to Frederick.
Posted by: Marlene | February 08, 2014 at 08:02 AM
UPDATE: Artist Thought Women Would Show 'Empathy' for Sculpture of Man in Underwear on College Campus...
Posted by: Extraneus | February 08, 2014 at 08:13 AM
Extraneus, When I saw that statue in the snow it reminded me of crazy people who wander away in cold weather and freeze to death.
Posted by: Miss Marple | February 08, 2014 at 08:43 AM
Marlene,
My daughter, who voted for him in 2008 but not 2012, looked up from her reading and said "He's got crazy eyes."
I thought he looked drugged, too.
Posted by: Miss Marple | February 08, 2014 at 08:45 AM
It occurs to me that both crazy and stoned might be possible if they are giving him thorazine.
Posted by: Miss Marple | February 08, 2014 at 08:45 AM
Partly because of Jane mentioning it, I broke down and turned to NBC to watch opening ceremony (airs 3 hours later here on West Coast, so I knew all about it from Twitter feed of East Coast viewers).
I kept the TV on mute the entire first 30 minutes (except for the brief portion with the tennis gal from Sochi). Obama seemed to dominate most of that air time. Didn't watch him, so didn't notice the stoned, tired look.
Lauer and Vierra, up next, were awful to watch on mute. Her head bobbed/nodded continuously with every lip movement from Lauer. She looked tired, angry and stiff. Lauer looked effete.
Once the talking heads were gone, I turned up the sound and watched until the USA team paraded in. Then turned it off and went to sleep. It reaffirmed for me that I have made the right choice in not watching opening Olympic ceremonies.
Posted by: centralcal | February 08, 2014 at 08:59 AM
There's a very good article in the WSJ opinion today about Casey Mulligan and his work that is behind the new CBO estimates about 404care's job destruction. He says the CBO still underestimates the negative impact. And he shreds the idea that it's really a good thing that there's lower employment.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304680904579367143880532248
And on the same page there's a story about a woman whom the University of Iowa pretty obviously discriminated against because she was politically conservative. It's one thing if a private institution wants to be an all liberal club, but for a state school to do it is particularly outrageous.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304691904579346401360317462
Not sure if either is available through the payroll.
Posted by: jimmyk | February 08, 2014 at 09:04 AM
Well i's all very meminiscent of the dystopia in Sleeper, and the other craxy take on revolution in Bananas'
On a serious note, we know who's side Putin was with in Iraq, how his wurlitzer has given sanctuary to the Assaange organization
http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/nsa-reportedly-spied-on-former-german.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AmericanPower+%28American+Power%29
Posted by: narciso | February 08, 2014 at 09:07 AM