What motivated the sophisticated sniper attack on a San Jose power station last April? The Times wonders:
Months Later, Sniper Attack at Power Hub Still a Mystery
SAN FRANCISCO — A mysterious and sophisticated sniper attack last year on a Silicon Valley power substation has underscored concerns about the vulnerability of the country’s electrical grid and prompted debate over whether it was an act of terrorism.
The chain of events is not in dispute: Shortly before 1:30 a.m. on April 16, 2013, one or more people methodically cut communication cables near a Pacific Gas & Electric substation in San Jose, sprayed more than 100 rifle bullets and knocked out 17 of the station’s 23 transformers before fleeing and avoiding capture. A grainy black-and-white surveillance video released by the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s office in a search for leads shows shots being fired for about a minute at the substation.
Though the utility was able to prevent a power failure by diverting electricity from other areas, the damage took 27 days to repair, said Brian Swanson, a spokesman for Pacific Gas & Electric.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation has been investigating the attack, but says it has no evidence of terrorism nor any suspects.
“The F.B.I. at this time does not believe it is related to terrorism, based on the initial assessment of the investigation,” Peter Lee, an agency spokesman in San Francisco, said, adding that he was unable to disclose further details. The agency also considers the attack an isolated one, Mr. Lee said.
...
A law enforcement official briefed on the investigation said the situation so far was ambiguous.
“When you don’t know who did it and you don’t know what their motives were, it is very hard to say whether it was terrorism or not,” the official said. “Some people said it looks like they had military training, some people say that you can learn this from a video game. We just don’t know.”
So who knows? But based on my extensive reading of fictional thrillers, I found this to be thought-provoking:
The attack has renewed anxiety over the potential vulnerability of the power grid to physical attack, adding to worries about cybersecurity and the ordinary adversaries of hurricanes, floods, wild animals and falling trees.
On Wednesday, utility officials tried to tamp down concern. “It’s harder to knock out the lights than people think because of redundancy and resilience,” said Gerry W. Cauley, president of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, a nonprofit group that sets standards for the nation’s utilities.
...
The location of substations is public, but it is a closely guarded secret what combination of them would have to be knocked out to cause extensive harm. It could be as few as a handful in each of the three grids, the eastern continent, from Halifax to New Orleans, the western continent, from New Mexico to Vancouver, and Texas.
We are building to the payoff:
In response to the April attack, the nation’s electric utilities began a two-and-a-half-year program to identify what substations or combinations of substations were most critical to the operations of the continent’s three power grids, how to minimize damage to them once an attack was detected, how to bring in law enforcement personnel before sending in the repair crews, and how to reconfigure the system after an attack to achieve maximum capacity.
I am sure this has crossed the minds of the people involved in this study, but - the playbook for the good guys could easily double as the game plan for the bad guys.
Just imagine that the people who hit the San Jose station are pros with a plan. And suppose they have their own Edward Snowden operating inside a utility somewhere. Within the next few years they may be able to steal away with the detailed assessment of the critical vulnerabilities of our nation's power grids which is currently under development. We might even speculate (wildly!) that a key goal of the San Jose exercise was to try to provoke the creation of such a plan.
Of course, the good guys see through this so they track access to the developing plans very carefully in an attempt to flush out the mole. Or try too - geez, such a page-turner.
Fortunately, we get CKWS and can watch the Olympic opening on Canadian TV.
Four years ago their coverage was much better than American TV.
Posted by: sbwaters | February 07, 2014 at 08:48 PM
A musical interlude.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2x8_okKTec
Posted by: Uriah Heap of shite | February 07, 2014 at 08:48 PM
Someone from the KGB should grab Matt Lauer and put duct tape over his mouth. It would improve Russian-American relations.
Posted by: miss Marple | February 07, 2014 at 08:48 PM
--7:56; That's tedious and unfathomable. Can you break it down?--
Sure, the NHTSA reaffirmed Toyota's findings, just as had happened previously with Audi, and found driver error not inherent defect as the cause.
Charles Mackay provides the explanation not product defect.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 07, 2014 at 08:49 PM
this is an excerpt of that LAtma report I was talking about, in a story about one of the stars
Posted by: narciso | February 07, 2014 at 08:50 PM
--" I don't like Woody Allen so has to be guilty, right?"
Rhetorical, right?--
A little sarcasm at my own expense, although I think it's a rather widespread prejudice.
Posted by: Ignatz | February 07, 2014 at 08:52 PM
Matt Lauer is Brian Williams with only 17 credits.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 07, 2014 at 08:52 PM
For those complaining about various aspects of this opening, please remember you are seeing it through the filter of NBC, official network of the Obama administration.
The muted national anthem by the monastery choir was a deliberate action by NBC, which controls the sound feed. There is no reason that choir should have sounded like they were in a closet.
Posted by: miss Marple | February 07, 2014 at 08:52 PM
So NBC was implying they're gay?
Posted by: Rob Crawford | February 07, 2014 at 08:54 PM
Bori, I wish I could point you somewhere. All I have seen is bloated stuff crammed onto franchisees by corporate honchos.
Posted by: henry | February 07, 2014 at 08:57 PM
Who was it here who was singing the praises of Victoria "Fuck the EU" Nuland recently (yesterday?)? She was the person who stonewalled Benghazi and got a promotion out of it, no?
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 07, 2014 at 08:57 PM
Lol. No Rob. It was a slam to Putin.
Lauer is snarling over a lot of things and I wish someone would give him the hook.
Posted by: miss Marple | February 07, 2014 at 08:57 PM
I never watch the opening ceremonies, though I will tune in for some of the sporting events. Is NBC the only way to watch the Olympics?
Posted by: Centralcal on iPad | February 07, 2014 at 09:10 PM
The Moldovian outfits are uglier than the USA's!
Posted by: Beasts of England | February 07, 2014 at 09:10 PM
Thanks Henry,
I worked with Aloha when they were starting out and that was perfect for small businesses. Now NCR bought the company and now they are bloated and the user friendly interface is intimidating to most that are not familiar.
Posted by: Bori | February 07, 2014 at 09:12 PM
Bori, I saw the same thing happen to the one Geac bought... Worked well until chasing big corporate deals made them switch to touch screen icons instead of text. Went from fast & easy to slow & confusing, but they got more sales. Happens all the time.
Posted by: henry | February 07, 2014 at 09:18 PM
Henri, yes, you are right, it is a shame because as more people are tech savvy the market is there. Big Corporations don't upgrade systems for years but small businesses are starting all the time.
Posted by: Bori | February 07, 2014 at 09:26 PM
Bori, the challenge has been the cost of sales & support doesn't scale down with the license fees. Cloud approaches may help on the support part and clean design will help even more, but sales cost is a problem. It is a good market if I can figure out how to make a profit.
Posted by: henry | February 07, 2014 at 09:38 PM
I'm too jaded, Jane.
Posted by: daddy | February 07, 2014 at 10:52 PM