This might be the greatest document ever to come out of the Clinton Administration. It is a follow-up to the Don Imus debacle, video of which is here.
« Being Paul Krugman | Main | Another Keystone Delay - Unexpectedly! »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Billy do.
Posted by: Don don't. | April 19, 2014 at 08:11 AM
A nappy-headed no.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | April 19, 2014 at 08:16 AM
from the NYT link - "The remarks were deemed so insulting that the association sent a letter of apology to the Clintons yesterday,..."
Remember how the MFM always apologized for insulting Bush?
Posted by: Janet - the districts lie fallow, while the Capitol gorges itself | April 19, 2014 at 08:48 AM
How can you insult a sexual predator and his enabler?
Posted by: Captain Hate | April 19, 2014 at 09:31 AM
But he didn't call anyone there a "domestic terrorist", so he has that going for his civility that night.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | April 19, 2014 at 09:33 AM
the Daily Mail, has a piece where they had Louis Stokes's car searched before he went into a White House meeting, in October 1993,
the culprit, David Watkins, the architect of the travelgate firings,
Posted by: narciso | April 19, 2014 at 09:36 AM
the Daily Mail, has a piece where they had Louis Stokes's car searched before he went into a White House meeting, in October 1993,
Wow, that is rich; Stokes' protege and successor, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, was one of Rodham's biggest supporters in 2008 (and took some heat in da hood for doing so).
Posted by: Captain Hate | April 19, 2014 at 09:44 AM
yes, and back then, he was even more pivotal;
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2608028/Racially-motivated-Clinton-Library-documents-black-congressman-ID-consent-car-search-entering-White-House-1993.html
Posted by: narciso | April 19, 2014 at 09:52 AM
I have no doubt that is the greatest document of the Clinton Admin but its equal can be read in just about any high school newspaper any day of the week.
Posted by: Happy, happy, joy, joy Ignatz | April 19, 2014 at 10:33 AM
I can't bring myself to click the link because a) buzzfeed and b) Clintons.
Posted by: AliceH | April 19, 2014 at 10:44 AM
Yes, giving buzzfeed a click is rarely a good idea.
Posted by: Captain Hate | April 19, 2014 at 10:50 AM
http://themetapicture.com/this-is-why-some-people-should-not-be-allowed-on-facebook/
Alternate title: Why increasing voter participation is not necessarily a good idea
Posted by: Miss Marple | April 19, 2014 at 10:56 AM
Alice:
I can't bring myself to click the link because a) buzzfeed
CH:
Yes, giving buzzfeed a click is rarely a good idea.
Heh. OK, then I'll go straight to youtube, but must at least credit Buzzfeed for where I found it.
My guess is that DrJ knows the music as well or better than anyone here.
But that daddy knows more of the people in the video.
Decide for yourself if that's a good enough promo for you to click this.
I'm not saying you should click it. In fact, you probably shouldn't.
I wouldn't blame anyone who chose to let his imagination guide him on what might be at the link, rather than actually clicking it.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | April 19, 2014 at 11:05 AM
Hard to have a thread a decent thread on Bill Clinton without a couple shots of canker sores on his lip.
Posted by: daddy | April 19, 2014 at 02:57 PM
Hit,
After watching that Dvorak Video I have this strange compulsion to start sticking 100 RMB Yuan notes into G-strings:)
Posted by: daddy | April 19, 2014 at 03:05 PM
Bill Clinton is sterile. (So, too, I'd bet, is Woody Allen.) And, any male from before there were mump vaccines. Getting mumps before you reached puberty, meant sterility followed.
So, Chelsea was fathered by Webster Hubbell. (Hillary was desperate!)
That Bill Clinton assumed parenthood? Yes. His name went on the birth certificate.
Bill Clinton did not impregnate Monica! Why republicans still need to kick this subject around, I have no idea. The People saw to it that Ken Starr's voyeurism did not pay off in political clout.
Posted by: Carol Herman | April 19, 2014 at 05:39 PM