Paul Krugman explains that he was right and Evil Righties were wrong about the response to the financial collapse of 2008. But the Times delivers a lovely correction of a Freudian slip, and Krugman continues to wear his Big Government blinders in contradiction of his own earlier analysis.
Slips first:
Correction: May 2, 2014
An earlier version of the web summary with this column pointed out that few economists saw the fiscal crisis coming. The crisis should have been referred to as a financial crisis.
It was not now, has never been and never will be a fiscal crisis! Fears that out-of-control spending will put us on the road to Argentina are soooo 2003 and subsequently sorta-kinda repudiated.
Let's switch to Krugman's ongoing tax-cut denialism of the logic of his own arguments. From the recent column:
...since the fall of Lehman Brothers, basic textbook macroeconomics has performed very well.
...
In what sense did economics work well? Economists who took their own textbooks seriously quickly diagnosed the nature of our economic malaise: We were suffering from inadequate demand. The financial crisis and the housing bust created an environment in which everyone was trying to spend less, but my spending is your income and your spending is my income, so when everyone tries to cut spending at the same time the result is an overall decline in incomes and a depressed economy. And we know (or should know) that depressed economies behave quite differently from economies that are at or near full employment.
For example, many seemingly knowledgeable people — bankers, business leaders, public officials — warned that budget deficits would lead to soaring interest rates and inflation. But economists knew that such warnings, which might have made sense under normal conditions, were way off base under the conditions we actually faced. Sure enough, interest and inflation rates stayed low.
And the diagnosis of our troubles as stemming from inadequate demand had clear policy implications: as long as lack of demand was the problem, we would be living in a world in which the usual rules didn’t apply. In particular, this was no time to worry about budget deficits and cut spending, which would only deepen the depression. When John Boehner, then the House minority leader, declared in early 2009 that since American families were having to tighten their belts, the government should tighten its belt, too, people like me cringed; his remarks betrayed his economic ignorance. We needed more government spending, not less, to fill the hole left by inadequate private demand.
What Krugman can't bring himself to write is that cutting taxes can serve as well as increasing government spending. The gist - if the tax cuts are spent, then it represents a government funded boost to demand; if they are saved, they help repair household private sector balance sheets by substituting public for private debt.
In earlier writings Krugman has acknowledged the private sector balance sheet problem:
Why is recovery from a financial crisis slow? Financial crises are preceded by credit bubbles; when those bubbles burst, many families and/or companies are left with high levels of debt, which force them to slash their spending. This slashed spending, in turn, depresses the economy as a whole.
And the usual response to recession, cutting interest rates to encourage spending, isn’t adequate. Many families simply can’t spend more, and interest rates can be cut only so far — namely, to zero but not below.
Does this mean that nothing can be done to avoid a protracted slump after a financial crisis? No, it just means that you have to do more than just cut interest rates. In particular, what the economy really needs after a financial crisis is a temporary increase in government spending, to sustain employment while the private sector repairs its balance sheet.
To be fair, Krugman resisted the notion in the quoted piece that cutting taxes could lead to balance sheet repair, so his denialism is consistent. he provided more on the private debt problem here:
Unfortunately, the economy didn’t come roaring back. Why?
The best explanation, I think, lies in the debt overhang. For the most part, even those who correctly diagnosed a housing bubble failed to notice or at least to acknowledge the importance of the sharp rise in household debt that accompanied the bubble
...
And I would argue that this debt overhang has held back spending even though financial markets are operating more or less normally again.
Yet tax cuts that helped reduce that private debt bubble wouldn't speed a recovery?
Oddly, when the political jockeying for the 2009 stimulus was underway, Krugman briefly favored some tax cuts. This is Jan 6, 2009:
How much do tax cuts and spending raise GDP? The widely cited estimates of Mark Zandi of Economy.com indicate a multiplier of around 1.5 for spending, with widely varying estimates for tax cuts. Payroll tax cuts, which make up about half the Obama proposal, are pretty good, with a multiplier of 1.29; business tax cuts, which make up the rest, are much less effective.
But by Jan 11 "pretty good" had changed to "ineffective":
First, Mr. Obama should scrap his proposal for $150 billion in business tax cuts, which would do little to help the economy. Ideally he’d scrap the proposed $150 billion payroll tax cut as well, though I’m aware that it was a campaign promise.
Money not squandered on ineffective tax cuts could be used to provide further relief to Americans in distress — enhanced unemployment benefits, expanded Medicaid and more.
Whatever. I puzzled over Krugman's notion that temporary tax cuts don't spur permanent long-term demand but temporary increases in spending do back in the day. A week later I scratched my head over his insistence that putting more money in people's pockets by way of a helicopter drop (or, heaven forbid, a tax cut) could not be stimulative but extending unemployment insurance could be. And (IIRC, after some emailing to intermediaries) Krugman got pushed back to a modest endorsement of payroll tax cuts.
Left unaddressed is the mix of spending versus saving when the Feds hand out money to the states to boost demand. Krugman is confident that tax cuts to "the rich" will simply be saved rather than spent and hence provide little stimulation. But economist John Taylor of Stanford found that states and municipalities tried to save today to smooth their budget problems over the next several years:
Individuals and families largely saved the transfers and tax rebates. The federal government increased purchases, but by only an immaterial amount. State and local governments used the stimulus grants to reduce their net borrowing (largely by acquiring more financial assets) rather than to increase expenditures, and they shifted expenditures away from purchases toward transfers. Some argue that the economy would have been worse off without these stimulus packages, but the results do not support that view.
More on that here:
The money sent to the states, meanwhile, didn't really increase infrastructure spending. If a state already had a light-rail project under way, it just borrowed less and used some of the federal money instead -- you didn't see more light-rail projects.
Manipulating fungible cash amongst varied short and long term accounts is a bedrock of state and municipal finance in this country; the ideas that sending Federal money to a state (even with earmarks) will force them to spend "that money" on a project rather than re-jiggle all their other accounts so that they spend and save as they want is naive.
Hmm. The dog barks, the day passes...
Oh nooo....
Posted by: Danube on iPad | May 03, 2014 at 12:05 PM
Rather than yammer about the stupidity of Kruggy, I'll point out that in 2000 and 2014 Dirk and Duncan have squared off in the playoffs as arguably the best players on their teams. Pretty remarkable in this day and age that they've both stayed with the same clubs and in Duncan's case has played for the same head coach. I'm kind of surprised the league hasn't made a bigger deal about that since both are first ballot HOFers in the same state.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2014 at 12:08 PM
Krugman is to TM what the Koch brothers are to Dingy Harry Reid.
/at theater with Frederick and 3 of his friends waiting for Spidey 2 in 3D to start
Posted by: 4JackisBack!2 (On His iPhone) | May 03, 2014 at 12:09 PM
Yes, you know he's a crook, but his 'honey badger' style is refreshing,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/02/david-rivera-running-for-congress_n_5253534.html
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 12:15 PM
"...but the results do not support that view."
To Paul Krugman and other liberals, those words might just as well have been written in Klingon. Liberal ideas, policies, theories are never based on results, history, or data. They are based on they same childish fantasies most of us had as middle-schoolers. It was results, history, and data that caused Conservatives to give up those fantasies.
Posted by: MaxB | May 03, 2014 at 12:44 PM
Results don't matter. It's your intentions that count.
Don't you want the poor to have a cellphone for emergencies you heartless penny counter?
Posted by: Stephanie spring sprung baseballs back umm ummm umm | May 03, 2014 at 12:58 PM
On a money/financial topic and for our Chi town friend I can now report that after two and a half years we've finally gotten the last 'chunk' of the money we were owed in the MF Global bankruptcy.
Can't begin to write in this forum what an 'education' that whole experience has been.
The below link gives an idea of the character of Corzine though. And I have some serious reservations that the corruption can ever be cleaned out in the CFTC or the SEC for that matter.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304178104579534033150753284
Posted by: glasater | May 03, 2014 at 01:08 PM
Congrats, glasater;
Some truths are verboten;
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303380004579521482247869874?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702303380004579521482247869874.html#
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 01:23 PM
Michael Barone continually tells us demographics that no one else seems to notice or report. Today in the Wash Examiner he notes this:
Posted by: GMax | May 03, 2014 at 01:44 PM
And I would put this one in the category of Dead Woman Walking:
the latest version of Elon’s poll, from April 2014, the first-term senator finds herself underwater: Hagan has seen her approval drop to 34 percent, while her disapproval has jumped a whopping 14 points to 46 percent
Elon had her a net positive in 2013. Elon is a private University in NC, and I have no reason to believe their polls would not be typical of University polls, skewed towards better results for Democrats than actually ever happen at the ballot box.
Posted by: GMax | May 03, 2014 at 01:52 PM
I love the Elon campus.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 03, 2014 at 02:02 PM
Any system which recycles money and takes 20-30% off the top for administration is inherently inefficient at delivering good and services.
Any system that spends money profligately and unwisely, and then borrows far in excess of its ability to repay that debt is doomed.
By the way, get a copy of today's WSJ if you haven't already. It may be one of the best daily papers ever written as a whole. So fascinating stuff; a review of the third and final volume of a biography of Kaiser Wilhelm II; a tremendous and highly influential review by Charles Murray of a very important new book called A troublesome Inheritance". It completely debunks the prevailing social science of race, showing that the genetic differences between races are indeed profound.
It was written by Nicholas Wade, the former science editor of the NYT, so it is going to stir up a hornet's nest. But the science is sound. This book is going to cause a seismic shift in how we think about race and genetics and how we, as humans, have propensities for certain abilities or afflictions.
Frankly, I'm happy with a nation of mutts.
And there's a bunch more, including a wonderful Noonan piece comparing the leadership of St. John Paul II and the lack thereof of Obama. The WSJ is rapidly occupying the journalistic high ground formerly owned by the NYT.
Posted by: matt | May 03, 2014 at 02:23 PM
I linked it at 1;23, matt, because someone was verklempt that Murray would review such a thing,
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 02:25 PM
A local guy was running the Boston Marathon when the bombing happened. He went back and finished this year...
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 03, 2014 at 03:06 PM
Good movie:Spidey 2 especially if you see with 4 10-11 year olds so they can tell you what the hell is going on.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 03, 2014 at 03:29 PM
Gee Hit, that made me cry.
Posted by: Jane | May 03, 2014 at 03:36 PM
I cried too, Jane. Beth is a friend of a friend.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 03, 2014 at 03:42 PM
Chicago destroys all good....
Chicago Tribune ( May 3, 2014 )
"A woman who died after the taxi in which she was riding was hit by a suspected drunken driver going the wrong way on Lake Shore Drive was about to graduate from University of Chicago Law School, authorities said this afternoon.
Charges are pending against the driver, whose vehicle collided with the taxi, killing Laura Anne LaPlante, of Hancock, N.H., and injuring himself and two others, police said.
"It is with profound sadness" that I tell you that LaPlante died, said University of Chicago Law School Dean Michael H. Schill in a written statement obtained by the Tribune. "This is a heart-rending loss."
LaPlante was the president of the Federalist Society at the school, treasurer for the Law School Republicans, an active member of the St. Thomas More Society, the Law Women's Caucus and the Edmund Burke Society, and had planned to join the Boston law firm WilmerHale as an associate in the fall after working there last summer as an associate, Schill said.
Schill said she was well known at the University of Chicago Law School for her "warmth and kindness " and was always ready to volunteer her help for either school events or friends -- "always with a smile for everyone.""
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-lake-shore-drive-crash-20140502,0,6024795.story
Posted by: Trapped in Chiraq | May 03, 2014 at 03:44 PM
And there's a bunch more
Matt didn't dare mention the cover article of the "Review" section on fat, and the "dubious science behind the anti-fat crusade."
Posted by: jimmyk | May 03, 2014 at 03:55 PM
I thought the WSJ occupied the journalistic high ground since at least the 70s.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2014 at 04:04 PM
Does anybody here like the musical group White Denim? They're from Austin so maybe Porch has some insight.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2014 at 04:05 PM
White Denim? That sounds racist.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 03, 2014 at 04:25 PM
The radio was on in the bedroom and I heard some sports announcing but couldn't hear the words.
It occurs to me I can tell auto race announcing from basketball simply by the tone and rhythm of the announcers.
Time to turn on the Derby coverage!
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 04:33 PM
Horse racing is not a sport because the jockey could smoke while riding.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 03, 2014 at 04:48 PM
Time to turn on the Derby coverage!
Actually, 6:23:30 is the time to turn on Derby coverage to avoid NBC's extravapalooza, manned by Tara Lupinsky and Jonny Wier -- or however their names are spelled.
Posted by: sbw | May 03, 2014 at 04:50 PM
DoT will probably be able to add more detail to this, but lets remember:
May 3, 1942, the first day of modern navy engagements in history is called the Battle of the Coral Sea. A Japanese invasion force succeeded in occupying Tulagi of the Solomon Islands in an expansion of Japan's defensive perimeter.
The US Navy, having broken Japan's secret war code and forewarned of an impending invasion of Tulagi and Port Moresby, attempted to intercept the Japanese armada. Four days of battles between Japanese and American aircraft carriers resulted in 70 Japanese and 66 Americans warplanes destroyed. This confrontation, called the Battle of the Coral Sea, marked the first air-naval battle in history, as none of the carriers fired at each other, allowing the planes taking off from their decks to do the battling. Among the casualties was the American carrier Lexington (CV2) which suffered such extensive aerial damage that it had to be sunk by its own crew. Two hundred sixteen Lexington crewmen died as a result of the Japanese aerial bombardment.
Although Japan continued on to occupy all of the Solomon Islands, its victory was a Pyrrhic one: the cost in experienced pilots and aircraft carriers was so great that Japan had to cancel its expedition to Port Moresby, Papua, as well as other South Pacific targets.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 03, 2014 at 04:57 PM
Touche, hit and run! Touche!
I declare you the winner of JOM today! LOL!
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 05:00 PM
But do you consider the horse an athlete? To some purists out there Secretariat is considered the most impressive ahtlete in the 20th century.t
BTW, pound for pound jockeys are probably the best and most fitted athletes in sport. They have forearms, wrists, thighs and calves of steel.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 03, 2014 at 05:05 PM
Lovely piece, hit. Still if the Boston PD hadn't been so dense the people of Boston wouldn't have had this tragedy .
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | May 03, 2014 at 05:10 PM
I consider both horse and jockey athletes.
Calvin Borel is riding a middling long shot, Ride on Curlin.
I am going with that since none of the others seem particularly interesting.
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 05:21 PM
The horse is not an athlete because the horse could smoke and compete at the same time.
Posted by: jimmyk | May 03, 2014 at 05:25 PM
Gotta go with Samraat, who is a Southampton Town (Watermill) product. The owner is the guy who runs Barnes and Noble and long time resident. He was raised and trained in Watermill. He is like 14 to 1 but hey, you go with home cooking every time.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 03, 2014 at 05:32 PM
Borel's horse is 15-1, and the only reason I picked him was Borel.
Jack, your choice is just as good with slightly better odds.
Although I love to watch horse racing, I know next to nothing about betting or picking a winner.
My grandad could read the racing form like a pro. I wish I had learned from him!
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 05:35 PM
--manned by Tara Lupinsky and Jonny Wier--
I'll pass without comment the dubious verb choice at the start, but do note toward the end of the sentence the presence of not only a silent but an invisible "Q".
Posted by: Happy, happy, joy, joy Ignatz | May 03, 2014 at 05:37 PM
I am told in a case that went before the Supreme Court around 1935 known as Jurnal V MacCracken the court held that each house of Congress indeed has the right to hold someone in contempt and to even jail them for the remainder of the legislative session. Given all of the smoke around Lerner and now Benghazi, I expect that needs to be threatened to some folks to make them quit hiding and withholding documents.
Posted by: GMax | May 03, 2014 at 05:37 PM
The extremely attractive Josie Cotton sings the official anthem for today's Derby; Johnny are you Queer?
Posted by: Happy, happy, joy, joy Ignatz | May 03, 2014 at 05:41 PM
I can't figure out why they haven't swept all the hard drives so no one can find a damn thing until they are out of office.
Posted by: Jane | May 03, 2014 at 05:43 PM
This is what happens when you ignor the
American people:
Posted by: GMax | May 03, 2014 at 05:44 PM
Walkover beginning!
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 05:47 PM
Keynesian economics is like Islam.
Say a guy has a hankering for 9-year-old girls and multiple sex slaves. Most people would think the guy a pervert who should be locked up, but if he claims that Mohammed's example is a spiritual ideal, he can argue for pedophilia and sex slavery in a solemn, moral, religious way. And who can argue with a person's religion?
Similarly, say a guy has a hankering for confiscatory taxation, vote buying, government power, socialism, and the personal skimming of taxpayer lucre. All he has to do is claim that he believes, truly believes, in a theory called Keynesian economics!
Either way, it's all about the stimulation.
Posted by: Extraneus | May 03, 2014 at 05:49 PM
The NYT tries to tamp down the suicides in their subscriber base come November by letting their readers know now that turnout machine aint gonna save em:
Posted by: GMax | May 03, 2014 at 05:53 PM
I can't figure out why they haven't swept all the hard drives so no one can find a damn thing until they are out of office.
I'm pretty sure they use an email system such as Lotus Notes or Microsoft Exchange, both of which store all emails on backed-up central servers, Jane. The emails aren't stored on their hard drives.
Posted by: Extraneus | May 03, 2014 at 05:59 PM
jib, my niece is rooting for the New York horse for that very reason.
Posted by: peter | May 03, 2014 at 06:09 PM
http://shoebat.com/2014/05/03/distribution-list-smoking-gun-benghazi-email-included-muslim-brotherhood-agent/
"It is a mystery how Alhassani slipped through the cracks to become a Special Assistant to the Office of the Chief of Staff, National Security Council Staff, and Executive Office of the President. It is unknown why a few hours before the Benghazi attack, Alhassani met in the White House with Samir Mayekar, a George Soros ‘fellow’ for an unscheduled visit."
Amazing!
Posted by: pagar | May 03, 2014 at 06:10 PM
Wehby, a physician, has the most remarkable campaign film--it's a mother talking about how Wehby saved her child when others physicians had told her there was no chance and she should abort. It's a masterpiece. I hope she wins BIG.
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | May 03, 2014 at 06:16 PM
I'm pretty sure they use an email system such as Lotus Notes or Microsoft Exchange, both of which store all emails on backed-up central servers, Jane. The emails aren't stored on their hard drives.
Well then I'm surprise they haven't swept the central servers Ex. I have no idea what that means but this administration is as dishonest as they come.
Posted by: Jane | May 03, 2014 at 06:23 PM
If Borel wins on Ride on Curlin, he will enter the field of greatest jockeys of all time.
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 06:29 PM
Patterico, has noticed a little known detail, re the disposition of the President, at the time of September 11th, he met with three debate advisors, around the time he was supposedly meeting with Panetta, re the attack on the Embassy compound
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 06:33 PM
narciso,
The dogs are on the hunt!
More will be revealed.
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 06:43 PM
Valiant attempt. At leaset not last. No kick at the end.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 03, 2014 at 06:44 PM
"...but this administration is as dishonest as they come."
Yep, and no doubt they would tamper with said servers if they could. WH email is administered by outside contractors. Last I heard it was Boeing.
Posted by: MaxB | May 03, 2014 at 06:47 PM
pagar,
More likely his job was as spiritual advisor to the POTUS.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 03, 2014 at 06:47 PM
It's good to have ya posting again, Extraneus.
Posted by: Janet - the districts lie fallow, while the Capitol gorges itself | May 03, 2014 at 06:51 PM
But political scientists and campaign operatives found that even Mr. Obama’s impressive ground operation was worth less than one point in his presidential elections.
[Gabe] Hey guys, we have all this wowie zowie data this time. And servers!!11! [/Malor]
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2014 at 06:52 PM
JiB, Doesn't look like he did much better than Rev Wright.
Posted by: pagar | May 03, 2014 at 06:53 PM
Bob Costas is REALLY short!
As in gnome short!
HA!
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 06:54 PM
Posted by: Extraneus | May 03, 2014 at 06:55 PM
--As in gnome short!--
Gremlin genus I believe.
Posted by: Happy, happy, joy, joy Ignatz | May 03, 2014 at 06:58 PM
Good to "see" you too, Janet!
Posted by: Extraneus | May 03, 2014 at 07:00 PM
I think ext's comment is right up there.
Like I said, today's edition of the Journal demonstrates just how good a paper can be. The WSJ's expansion into lifestyle and especially the Review section are simply amazing.
Sometimes it's meh, but often it comes close to brilliance. The one thing I hate is the book reviews. Querida gets very upset when she sees the Alibris or Amazon deliveries the week after a good section.
The whole Jonny Weir thing creeps me out. In the film The 5th Element there is a character like his, and there have been other movies of the years with the over the top transvestites or queens.Now we are forced to put up with it in the sports section.
Back in the early 90's I fought a losing battle against the expansion of figure skating in the Olympics. It is the most catty, vicious and nasty crew I have ever seen. It would make a great black comedy. I remember driving with one of our salesmen in Georgia when the news that Nancy Kerrigan had been whacked with a lead pipe in the study and my immediate reaction was that it was another skater.
And for that society was forced to endure naked Tonya Harding pics for years afterwards. Blech.
Anyway, Buick had done all of the research and said that ice skating brings in women, who spend huge amounts of the family budget and the rest was history. One of the reasons I got out. Friggin commercialism and greed.
Posted by: matt | May 03, 2014 at 07:02 PM
"...Congress indeed has the right to hold someone in contempt and to even jail them"
There is an actual jail in the basement of the capitol for that purpose. I understand that it hasn't been used since about the time of that Court case.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | May 03, 2014 at 07:08 PM
Wehby on Issues
I'm a little concerned about having a brain surgeon in the Senate. The temptation to attempt twenty or thirty absolutely no risk brain transplants will be very hard for her to resist.
Posted by: Rick B | May 03, 2014 at 07:10 PM
Jane:
Well then I'm surprise they haven't swept the central servers Ex. I have no idea what that means but this administration is as dishonest as they come.
Does the name Richard Windsor mean anything to you?
And . . . we do remember that this is part of what the left accused Bush of, right?
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 03, 2014 at 07:13 PM
It really is striking how connected Al Hassani, is, to the Syrian Emergency Task Force, through one figure, to the ISB, which leads to the T-Dawg brothers.
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 07:20 PM
The WSJ's expansion into lifestyle and especially the Review section are simply amazing.
Sometimes it's meh, but often it comes close to brilliance. The one thing I hate is the book reviews. Querida gets very upset when she sees the Alibris or Amazon deliveries the week after a good section.
Their rock reviewer, Jim Fusilli, keeps me informed of new stuff so I don't have to plow through tons of sludge to find a gem. Although I let my subscription lapse I still pick up the friday and weekend editions, specifically for the entertainment sections. Morgenstern's pretty good on movies too.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2014 at 07:26 PM
When they are good, like Matt Ridley dispatching the army of strawmen, re fracking
and the Sky Dragon scam last week, they are first rate,
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 07:33 PM
It is exactly this kind of sophomoric trash disguised as intelligent opinion that made me drop the print media. MoDo has to be the most vapid piece of language arts practioners in the world. She makes a living with this kind of clap trap is another indicator of how far we have fallen as society. If Michael Bechloss is correct that Champ is the "smartest president to ever serve" (hear that Tom Jefferson?) than that only proves we are the most stupid audience for those remarks.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 03, 2014 at 07:58 PM
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/05/01/benghazi-follow-up-who-told-ben-rhodes-to-lie-about-u-tube-video-our-research-provides-the-answer/
adding details to the Benghazi timeline
Posted by: Janet - - the districts lie fallow, while the Capitol gorges itself | May 03, 2014 at 08:00 PM
They think Rhodes GOALS came from - "The impetus of the instructions to Communications Director, Ben Rhodes, came from the man who is not only close to Obama, but was with him in the Oval Office as the crisis unfolded and who is now his Chief of Staff, Denis McDonough.
Posted by: Janet - - the districts lie fallow, while the Capitol gorges itself | May 03, 2014 at 08:08 PM
Welp it looks like the Pacers will somehow advance to round 2.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2014 at 08:11 PM
'Friends don't let Friends' take Mo Dowd seriously, McDonough was known as the other minder for General Jones, and one of the architects of the outreach to the Brotherhood,
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 08:14 PM
Chaos theory, seems to be the operating principle, Captain,
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 08:16 PM
Attention Obama and Michelle, Jay Carney, and assorted people on the dias:
The hymns of the various military services are not dinner music which you laugh and chat during.
Another disgrace.
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 08:24 PM
Shit, Hit!
Posted by: Jane | May 03, 2014 at 08:27 PM
Speaking of chaos, I just heard on the radio that the NBA plans on announcing a CEO to oversee the Clip Joint's day to day operations. Is that even legal when Sterling still owns it? I know the league has run a couple teams when the owners had financial problems and they ran it until there was a legit buyer but that's not what this situation is at all. I'm sure Sterling has an armada of sharks to fight this in court.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2014 at 08:29 PM
California Chrome, baby!!!
I had not heard of him until one of the local papers told his rags to riches story. His dam was a $8,000 or so claimer and his sire was not that special. Sometimes a horse is just born with the right stuff.
We'll see how he does in the Preakness.
Posted by: matt | May 03, 2014 at 08:30 PM
I like Morgenstern's reviews, too. I have to think that style section was expanded to further capture NYT readers.
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | May 03, 2014 at 08:35 PM
Lets calculate the returns. $10,000 total investment
Turns down $6 MM for a 50% interest.
$10,000 to $12 MM!!
My HP 12 C just started smoking and quit calculating.
Posted by: GMax | May 03, 2014 at 08:36 PM
Could be 'round up the usual suspects;
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/05/breaking-11-terrorists-with-links-to-al-qaeda-arrested-for-disappearance-of-flight-mh370/
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 08:39 PM
Morgenstern piqued my interest in Winters Bone and the rest is history. I like how he recycles DVD recs that are similar to the new releases being reviewed. Yesterday he listed Boy A for at least the second time, which I highly recommend.
Posted by: Captain Hate | May 03, 2014 at 08:40 PM
Still unknown apparently!
http://libertyunyielding.com/2014/05/03/the-question-remains-where-are-the-benghazi-survivors/
Posted by: pagar | May 03, 2014 at 08:47 PM
pagar, Where are they? And where is Stephens diary? And where are those documents removed from Muslim Brotherhood HQ?
Lots of questions need to be answered!
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 08:50 PM
they probably sent them to Guam, like those failed Iraq plotters, were exiled to
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 08:53 PM
Did it tip over from all the extra weight, I hear there was some concern expressed about that.
Posted by: GMax | May 03, 2014 at 08:55 PM
the Brotherhood's documents were published in an Egyptian paper, including the ties to Morsi,
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 08:57 PM
narciso,
Right as you posted that, I got an order in my eBay store from Guam.
Cue Twilight Zone music!
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 08:58 PM
I was watching the pre-race activities and couldn't really take it when they had interviews with that gawd awful hat on Johnny Weir.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2014 at 09:02 PM
I was pulling for Uncle Sigh.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2014 at 09:03 PM
My grammar needs some work. They didn't really interview a hat.
Posted by: Sue | May 03, 2014 at 09:06 PM
MM, I've been meaning to ask if you would post your store url.
I love antiques, nicnacs and assorted old things. Just recently purchased a bugs bunny baseball pitcher 3d thingy for the game room wall that looks 40-50s era and it's about 3 ft high. No idea if it was a deal or not, but I liked it.
Posted by: Stephanie spring sprung baseballs back umm ummm umm | May 03, 2014 at 09:08 PM
NBA may have a real problem:
http://msn.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/nba-lacks-the-authority-to-force-donald-sterling-to-sell-the-clippers-050114
If Sterling sues, he'll get the TRO as a matter of course. The test will come 17 days later when the court either grants or denies the Preliminary Injunction. If it grants it, this thing goes on for a long, long time. My guess is that the court will grant the PI.
We could have quite a circus coming up. Can the league even get the audio into evidence?
Posted by: Danube on iPad | May 03, 2014 at 09:09 PM
all hat and no cattle, sue, Judge Jeanine, points out the President dismisses the paramilitary protester in Slaviansk, surface to air missiles and all, in the way he didn't with Benghazi,
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 09:09 PM
The IQ was about the same, Sue.
Posted by: Stephanie spring sprung baseballs back umm ummm umm | May 03, 2014 at 09:09 PM
Looks like the Derby has joined figure skating as the realm of chicks and gays. Wonder how many man caves tuned in? You know its kaput when prosecco instead of Bud Light is the sponsor of choice.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 03, 2014 at 09:10 PM
My grammar needs some work. They didn't really interview a hat.
hahahaaa! Too funny!
Posted by: Janet - - the districts lie fallow, while the Capitol gorges itself | May 03, 2014 at 09:11 PM
Stephanie, I don't post my eBay store address here because of my fears that malicious leftists will harass me and file complaints.
If you send me an email at christa dot cooper at comcast dot net, I will give you the store name and how to find it.
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 03, 2014 at 09:15 PM
This is garbage, how about liquidating a player's assets in the unlikely event they commit an assault, are involved in a DUI, get caught in a rape investigation, you know things that never happen in the NFL or NBA?
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 09:15 PM
For your leisurely pleasure, WWI in pictures.
Remember it was the "great war" to "end all wars". Look at these photos and picture modern day Ukraine, Syria or even Israel.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 03, 2014 at 09:17 PM
at least there was a race at Talladega this afternoon.
saw Spiderman 2 as well. good movie-surprised how good Jamie Foxx was.
Posted by: rich@gmu | May 03, 2014 at 09:20 PM
Really not too many villains, or too much retconning Parker's origins,
Posted by: narciso | May 03, 2014 at 09:22 PM