The WaPo weighs Obama's disengagement with the border crisis as well as the political crosscurrents sweeping him under:
Border crisis scrambling the politics of immigration policy
Until now, the politics of immigration have been seen as a no-lose proposition for President Obama and the Democrats. If they could get a comprehensive overhaul passed, they would win. And if Republicans blocked it, the GOP would further alienate crucial Hispanic and moderate voters.
But with the current crisis on the Southwest border, where authorities have apprehended tens of thousands of unaccompanied Central American children since October, that calculus may be shifting.
Republicans and even some Democrats have accused Obama of being insufficiently engaged in a calamity that many say he should have seen coming.
They highlight the politically challenging and contradictory position in which Obama finds himself (yes, that is a passive voice tribute to Obama...):
Obama’s goal now is to make clear to adults in Central America that there is no payoff for sending their children on the dangerous journey northward, said Cecilia Muñoz, the White House domestic policy director. “He feels intensely a responsibility to prevent an even greater humanitarian crisis,” she said.
Oh, stop it, you're killing me...
That, however, means speeding the deportation of most of those who have already arrived, which many in Obama’s own party are resisting.
“It is contrary to everything we stand for as a people to try to summarily send children back to death . . . in a place where drug gangs are the greatest threat to stability, rule of law and democratic institutions in this hemisphere,” Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley (D) said in Nashville, where the National Governors Association was meeting.
Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Tex.) agreed in an interview: “I would like to see him place greater emphasis on the interests of these children who are refugees from extreme violence and instability in their home countries” instead of “an acceleration of the deportation process at the expense of these children.”
So in actuality Obama has to persuade Central American parents to keep their kids at home even though they will ultimately be welcomed into the US if their parents do choose to send them north. Good luck messaging that.
The WaPo includes this passage describing an Obama meeting with immigration advocates:
Two weeks ago, with Republicans criticizing the administration’s handling of the border crisis, Obama gathered advocates for another private meeting at the White House.
The session grew heated when some of them criticized the administration’s tough posture toward the children on the border, according to several people who attended.
Marshall Fitz, immigration policy director at the Center for American Progress, said that Obama, a former community organizer, told the group that “in another life, I’d be on the other side of the table.”
Another life?
Compassionate progressives are surprised:
But O’Rourke added that he has been surprised by the anger he has heard toward the immigrants from many of his El Paso constituents, who “feel like we can’t take care of everyone, and these children and their families are gaming the system.”
Gaming the system? Really?
The WaPo reminisces about Team Obama's competence:
The emergency has also renewed questions about the administration’s competence, reminiscent of those raised during the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill, last year’s botched rollout of the health-care law and more recent revelations of mismanagement that jeopardized care of patients at veterans hospitals.
The good news is the VA debacle is off the front page.
The WapO provides a "Where Was Obama" wrap-up:
There is also the question of whether the Obama administration ignored the signs as the emergency was developing.
As far back as May 2012, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) warned Obama in a letter that “there is a surge of unaccompanied illegal minors entering the United States. Apart from being part of an obvious humanitarian crisis, these unaccompanied illegal minors have left the federal government scrambling to triage the results of its failed border security and immigration policies.”
At last week’s governors meeting, Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad (R) said the administration was “asleep at the switch.”
A Republican Governor can be dismissed as a partisan hack. However...
Some border-state Democrats have joined the criticism.
“The numbers have spiked recently, but this is not a new development,” said Rep. Ron Barber (D-Ariz.). “It seems to me that the administration just wasn’t paying close attention and could have acted sooner.”
Barber noted that 30 percent of apprehensions of illegal immigrants are made in his Tucson-area district, as are up to 47 percent of cartel drug-running arrests. His constituents, who already live in fear for their safety, are now seeing law enforcement agents diverted to child care.
“They’re doing a great job, but it’s not their job, and it’s allowed the front line to be thinned even further,” Barber added.
And:
Yet even some Democrats say Obama has not appeared to be as engaged as they would like.
When the president made a fundraising swing through Texas without going to the scene of the crisis, Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Tex.) complained on MSNBC: “He can’t even go 242 miles to the Texas border? Border community leaders want to see him down there on the border. And I think the optics and the substance of it is that he should show up at the border.”
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/06/Fourteenth-Amendment-Empowers-Congress-to-End-Birthright-Citizenship
Subject to the optics thereof...
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 13, 2014 at 01:31 PM
Were the object to solve the current problem, the solution is simple. A quick change in the law and the "kids" go home.
Anyone making more of this is attempting not to waste a crisis.
Posted by: MarkO | July 13, 2014 at 02:01 PM
the administration wheeled out Eric Holder for the sunday chatfest ...
http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/eric-holder-palin-good-vp-candidate-worse-judge/story?id=24539828&singlePage=true
oh my.
Posted by: rich@gmu | July 13, 2014 at 02:07 PM
There are numerous and growing media reports that this event was orchestrated by Obama himself in order to force amnesty. Does it make sense? Of course not. But Obama has shown before that he does not think right. For example he ridicules the GOP to get their cooperation. Patterico is reporting that Mexico has given Central America a free pass and is cooperating with the human traffickers. The Last Refuge is reporting that prior to the Mexican agreement a meeting was held by the Hispanic Caucus to start the flood.
It has now backfired, but Obama has tied his own hands. So he plays golf. Not a smidgeon on common sense.
Posted by: jack | July 13, 2014 at 02:09 PM
Maybe as part of his delusional take on his life, 404 imagines with open borders neither of his trash parents would have deserted the needy little brat.
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2014 at 02:10 PM
It's got to be a full time job for the media to figure out how to ignore all these stories.
I say bring them in. Send the gangs to Chicago (because we want them to feel right at home) and the rest to Detroit. Deed the city to them. They can't do any worse.
Posted by: Jane | July 13, 2014 at 02:12 PM
MarkO is right again.
I have wondered what it the 2008 law says the "children" need to be released prior to their court date.
The loon Arpaio:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/07/sheriff-joe-arpaio-my-tents-are-hilton-hotels-compared-to-whats-going-on-at-immigrant-detention-centers-video/
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 13, 2014 at 02:13 PM
MarkO-
Doubtful. The change would be challenged in court and the change would be struck down. And would the administration even sign a change or the Senate pass a change. The change would also be demagogued as wild-eyed Reps want to send these poor children back to narco traffickers and condemn them to a life of sex slavery. And any other hook in the volumes of immigration law would be found to stall the process.
They are here. They are staying.
Posted by: rich@gmu | July 13, 2014 at 02:14 PM
Seems like a good time to head for Martha's Vineyard.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | July 13, 2014 at 02:17 PM
IMO, Sarah Palin was 1000% better than Joe Biden as a candidate for vice president.
------------------------------------------
I concur with the post by rich @2:14PM
Posted by: pagar | July 13, 2014 at 02:24 PM
pager-
it was nice she got under his skin though.
Posted by: rich@gmu | July 13, 2014 at 02:35 PM
Holder said that he and President Obama are treated differently than their predecessors.
“There's a certain level of vehemence, it seems to me, that's directed at me [and] directed at the president,” Holder said. “You know, people talking about taking their country back. … There's a certain racial component to this for some people. I don’t think this is the thing that is a main driver, but for some there's a racial animus.”
Asked about his controversial comments from 2009, in which he called the United States a “nation of cowards” when it comes to race, Holder stood firm.
“I wouldn't walk away from that speech,” Holder said. “I think we are still a nation that is too afraid to confront racial issues,” rarely engaging “one another across the color line [to] talk about racial issues.”
wit and wisdom of our great AG.
Posted by: rich@gmu | July 13, 2014 at 02:39 PM
It ain't the color of those retard's skin - it's the extreme thinness, thereof.
And thin-skinned pols shouldn't run around calling other people cowards. What a pitiful little crybaby.
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 02:45 PM
thinking along similar lines beasts.
see that you survived your outing with the drink cart girls ...
Posted by: rich@gmu | July 13, 2014 at 02:47 PM
*retards' skin*
And Gisele at the World Cup! Wheeee!!!!
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 02:48 PM
Best that I can tell, rich - glad they drove me around. A DUI would have ruined the celebration...
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 02:49 PM
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/07/12/hondorun-president-vows-to-keep-dumping-illegal-alien-children-on-u-s-border-until-his-friend-president-obama-says-to-stop/
Posted by: Danube on iPad | July 13, 2014 at 02:49 PM
I'm picking Argentina to win. That and fifty cents will get you half a buck...
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 02:51 PM
even better beasts a date and a designated driver.
a 2 for 1 score.
Posted by: rich@gmu | July 13, 2014 at 02:52 PM
as he would DoT
#moralhazard
Posted by: rich@gmu | July 13, 2014 at 02:57 PM
There are a lot of reasons for me to see the Senate go GOP in 2014 but right up there in importance is to keep Holder off the SCOTUS.
Despicable person with the scent of corruption on him.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | July 13, 2014 at 02:59 PM
would like to see him impeached and removed from office.
then tarred and feathered.
then bankrupted and jailed.
Posted by: rich@gmu | July 13, 2014 at 03:07 PM
I'm quite willing to give Janet Reno some of the credit for the stench emanating from the wholly corrupt DoJ. There's no doubt in my mind she planted many of the loathsome weeds choking out any honesty there. I'll decline Holder's RaceCard by noting that the stench of his corruption would not be any sweeter if he were emerald green.
Posted by: Rick B | July 13, 2014 at 03:09 PM
Thoughtful article by Kareem on LeBron's move home.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwaski | July 13, 2014 at 03:14 PM
Just wanted to say, MM, if you're reading this, I'm so sorry to hear about your news (previous thread), and you're in my prayers.
Posted by: James D. | July 13, 2014 at 03:15 PM
I'm rooting for Argentina, Beasts, but have thought from the first game of the tournament that Germany looked like the team to beat.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwaski | July 13, 2014 at 03:16 PM
Reno should be cooling her enormous clodhoppers in some club Fed for sending a couple tanks crashing into a house to "save the chirrun" by roasting them. Not to mention trying to railroad a standup Florida citizen for bogus child abuse charges. Floridians responded to that by trucking her gawky ass in the donk primary for governor in the most pleasing primary result until Forrest Gump's.
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2014 at 03:17 PM
this is a surprising op ed for the WaPo (a few days old, but still):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/07/11/the-insiders-more-irs-smidgens-show-up-perfect/
But these revelations are definitely meaningful smidgens. At what point does a flock of smidgens become irrefutable evidence that deserves an independent examination?
Posted by: rich@gmu | July 13, 2014 at 03:26 PM
Oh the Fusters, that tale makes the Amirault's seem tame by comparison, her protege in the state's attorney, is the Latin Martha Coakley
Posted by: narciso | July 13, 2014 at 03:29 PM
Germany looks a little disheveled...
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 03:34 PM
I can't imagine that Holder would be approved for SCOTUS given he has a contempt of congress citation pending.
Posted by: Jane | July 13, 2014 at 03:37 PM
To deport or not to deport, that is the question--let's go golfing.
Posted by: clarice | July 13, 2014 at 03:37 PM
Was that the name of the cop who was being railroaded, narc? I remember the WSJ, whether it was Rabinowitz, who would be the likely person, or somebody else who went full expose on that travesty.
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2014 at 03:37 PM
What tale Narc?
Posted by: Jane | July 13, 2014 at 03:38 PM
Indeed, Clarice - when the going gets tough, the tough get golfing. Or something like that...
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 03:45 PM
Here you go, Jane:
http://fathersmanifesto.net/renorosn.htm
I was thinking of the Snowden case, which was pretty bad too.
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2014 at 03:46 PM
Rabinowitz on Grant Snowden: http://www.lukeford.net/Dennis/p48.html
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2014 at 03:53 PM
I'll give soccer one massive thumbs up over football; the World Cup halftime show consists of....uh.....pretty much nothing, instead of a three hour extravaganza of wrinkled rockers on crutches and IVs, assorted opening act nitwits, assorted nitwit commercials and a general fog of really bad taste and amazement that every new year's was somehow worse than lasts's.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwaski | July 13, 2014 at 04:07 PM
So sorry to hear the bad news, Miss M. Prayers for the best.
Posted by: lyle | July 13, 2014 at 04:10 PM
And Beasts? Wouldn't you just love some match play with Barry with some serious side bet action?
Posted by: lyle | July 13, 2014 at 04:14 PM
Only if he didn't cheat, lyle! I have no doubt in my mind that he does...
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 04:30 PM
this is the real and enduring cost of Benghazi
http://www.libyaherald.com/2014/07/13/violent-clashes-at-tripoli-international-airport/#axzz37NAWIJNI
Posted by: narciso | July 13, 2014 at 04:37 PM
The goalies get some very serious hang-time from those kicks, don't they?
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 04:43 PM
Sorry to read that, MM. I know you didn't request advice, but some has already been offered. As one of the divorced members here, I would like to offer perhaps a contrary view.
Some have advised retaining the best divorce lawyer you can find. This may indeed be a good idea, but it wasn't a good idea in my case, and let me tell you why.
At the beginning of our divorce odyssey, my ex and I hired "good" lawyers. (This generally means lawyers who charge between $200 and $400 per hour.)
After the initial "free" consultation, you have a meeting with your lawyer. Say it takes an hour, and let's just assume both lawyers get $300/hr. The meeting costs $300.
After the meeting, your lawyer writes a letter to the other lawyer. He charges $300 to write the letter.
Your husband's lawyer receives and reads the letter. He charges a half hour for that, or $150. Then your husband has an hour-long meeting with his lawyer, costing him $300. His lawyer writes a response to your lawyer's letter, charging $300 to do so. Your lawyer reads the letter, charging $150 to do so. Then he calls you to advise you of the response, charging $150 for the call.
At this point, you and your husband have racked up $1,650 in legal fees. A single letter was written and responded to.
After my ex and I spent around $10,000 of marital assets in this manner, we decided to discuss some issues without the help of our lawyers. All told, we did fork over around $20,000 to two lawyers before we both fired our attorneys and ended up negotiating an agreeable settlement in the office of my new (and still current) attorney and our accountant.
(Someone else advised securing bank accounts, etc. In my experience, only a fool would try to steal marital assets. Your husband will be required to produce all manner of bank and financial statements.)
Btw, my ex and I are still great friends and have worked together for the past 15 years to raise our children, together. This was only possible after we came to the agreement that our lawyers were milking us for legal fees that could have otherwise gone to ourselves, children's education, etc.
I think it's possible to negotiate a fair settlement, splitting all marital assets and providing an income for you as well, without the bitter battle that lawyers can instigate in their own interests.
Just my 2 cents. Sorry for the long post.
Posted by: Extraneus | July 13, 2014 at 04:48 PM
Free soccer.
Germany seems off today. Mentally and a half step physically.
Missed the first half, but that was the impression for me.
Posted by: Stephanie tortoise not the hare | July 13, 2014 at 04:56 PM
WTF? MM is getting divorced? Since when? The finger think sucks but this sucks bigger,
Argies are dragging. Can the Hun take advantage?
Posted by: Jim Eagle | July 13, 2014 at 04:57 PM
Miss Bardahl doesn't dissapoint in her sampling of raw crazy.
Posted by: narciso | July 13, 2014 at 04:58 PM
glad to see you're doing better, JiB, do you use Bright House, because it toads the wet sprocket
Posted by: narciso | July 13, 2014 at 05:01 PM
narc,
BH it is. CF13Weather keeps me dry and safe:)
Are you in Port Orange? Frederick is goiing to Embry-Riddle Aviation camp tiomorrow if you want a coffee chat?
Posted by: Jim Eagle | July 13, 2014 at 05:05 PM
"toads the wet sprocket"
OK, I give up...
Posted by: Old Lurker | July 13, 2014 at 05:12 PM
'really carpy and intermittent service,
Posted by: narciso | July 13, 2014 at 05:17 PM
no, that one fell through, had to go farther north,
Posted by: narciso | July 13, 2014 at 05:18 PM
OL,
You want something ekse - disappointing,
but I gave up DirectTV for it and am pleased.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | July 13, 2014 at 05:19 PM
Yeah, remember now, Ormand, Even closer, Lets have a coffee.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | July 13, 2014 at 05:22 PM
This sport needs helmets
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 13, 2014 at 05:22 PM
Did I call the shot? Yes I believe I did, although I did not expect it to take 111 minutes to get the first goal of the match.
Posted by: GMax | July 13, 2014 at 05:25 PM
Germany's Hazard scores and it was a beauty,
Posted by: Jim Eagle | July 13, 2014 at 05:26 PM
You seem to call all the shots...
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 13, 2014 at 05:31 PM
Bayern Munich will win the WC
Posted by: GMax | July 13, 2014 at 05:33 PM
Terrible ref regardless of what NK says, But the best team won.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | July 13, 2014 at 05:37 PM
The best team 1 thru 11 going into the tourney, is the Champion. Sometimes, that does not happen in soccer.
Posted by: GMax | July 13, 2014 at 05:38 PM
MM,
I'm not a divorce lawyer but I agree with Ext. If you can work it out, or even opt for mediation, you will preserve a ton of assets.
Meanwhile I'm very sorry.
Posted by: Jane | July 13, 2014 at 05:39 PM
The winning team:
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/07/13/man-uses-german-police-car-megaphone-to-shout-anti-israel-slogans-during-free/
World piss-cup.
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 13, 2014 at 05:43 PM
I just accidentally clicked through a story and into the comments. Read a few then had to scroll to the top to find who was hosting the thing.
HuffPo.
Boy the commenters there are just plain nuts!
DOOM
Posted by: Old Lurker | July 13, 2014 at 05:45 PM
OL,
Welcome to the 2nd Civil War. It is coming. Believe me. No nation can survive like this.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | July 13, 2014 at 05:49 PM
The Hill does not present it this way, but the realization is beginning to dawn on the donor class of Democrats:
This is precisely why Zero has been so anxious to try to rev up Democrats, he knows they are quite close to throwing in the towel.
Posted by: GMax | July 13, 2014 at 05:51 PM
While I agree with Jane, the major reason I recommend hiring the best divorce lawyer MM can afford ASAP is her vulnerable financial position and the apparent difference in earning ability between her and her spouse.
IMO, from what few facts I know, she needs competent advice as to her options, and her bargaining position in an agreement or a mediated settlement so she doesn't sell herself short. A 65 year old female eking out a living on ebay and is abandoned after 35 years of marriage should be able to command a settlement that guarantees her reasonable financial security from here on out. Things would be much different when both spouses are younger or are essentially financially independent.
But I have no idea what the domestic relations law in Indiana is.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads f/k/a vnjagvet | July 13, 2014 at 05:53 PM
Do the players get a check for World Cup play, or do they, such as Messi, have to squeeze by on $42.5M per year outside of the tournament?
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 05:56 PM
JiB and narc for coffee sounds like a lot of fun.
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2014 at 05:57 PM
Is the kickball contest blessedly over?
Posted by: lyle | July 13, 2014 at 06:01 PM
Beasts, Tiger Woods would be awed by the size of the endorsement deals the winners will get.
Posted by: henry | July 13, 2014 at 06:02 PM
The kicking has stopped, the crying has begun, and the riots are imminent, lyle.
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 13, 2014 at 06:08 PM
Since, unlike MM, we don't know what Mr Marple is like we don't really have any idea if an amicable arrangement is possible.
It is always easier, and almost always cheaper, to fire a lawyer when you determine you don't need him anymore than it is to hire one to repair things when you determine you should have had one in the first place.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwaski | July 13, 2014 at 06:09 PM
How would you rank the tournament overall, henry - terribly impressive?
Be nice, lyle!!! ;)
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 06:09 PM
What a thoughtful post, Ext. I wish I had had the benefit of your wisdom 40-some years ago when my first marriage ended. We wasted so much money and emotion over battles that were trivial, at least in the long view. Hard to remain level headed though, while also dealing with the anguish of divorce.
I'm sorry for your pain, Miss Marple. I hope your children and grandchildren are a comfort to you.
Posted by: (A)Nuther Bub | July 13, 2014 at 06:11 PM
Is the kickball contest blessedly over?
Please make it so.
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2014 at 06:14 PM
Beasts, the tournament was better than average. Today's final was exceptional. Either team could have won in regular time, then again in extra time. Skills displayed were simply awesome, though Steinshweiger obviously dove on 13 of 14 falls. I'm glad it was decided on the field instead of a shoot out. As it happens, I rooted for Argentina today -- they had plenty of chances to win it but missed by that much.
Posted by: henry | July 13, 2014 at 06:18 PM
There does appear to be lots of crying in soccer. I know when the Aubturds ran the ball back with one second left in the Iron Bowl last year, I didn't cry - I just kicked the crap outta my dog...
(Just kidding - I don't have a dog)
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 06:19 PM
Great WC. Even cotncussions to make it more acceptable to Americans. Wouldn't be great to see the NFL play at such a pace:)
Posted by: Jim Eagle | July 13, 2014 at 06:21 PM
IMO, from what few facts I know, she needs competent advice as to her options, and her bargaining position in an agreement or a mediated settlement so she doesn't sell herself short.
I support that, as long as the lawyer who gives the advice is not the one who gets retained, and that he or she knows, going in, that they aren't going to be able to send their kids to Harvard on your dime.
(The first thing they do is ask questions to determine your net worth. Purely in your own interest, of course.)
Give advice as to the options and bargaining position. Offer to be available for questions going forward. Charge a fair fee for that, but that's it. No restraining orders or knocks in the night by the County Sheriff with an order to confiscate all firearms, or other bullshit moves intended to piss off the other side into retaliating.
[ahem]
Posted by: Extraneus | July 13, 2014 at 06:24 PM
@henry: The goal by Goetz (sp?) was a beautiful feat of athleticism. Not as pretty as the one from the Columbian kid earlier in the tournament, but, seeing those displays makes me sincerely appreciate the sport.
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 06:25 PM
Hard to remain level headed though, while also dealing with the anguish of divorce.
They know that only too well, AB.
Posted by: Extraneus | July 13, 2014 at 06:28 PM
My enthusiasm for futbol rapidly diminished when my daughters stopped playing after HS. But I enjoyed watching the US women's olympic teams, and this World Cup. With the exception of the Brazilian cave in after they lost their star, I thought the quality of play and the all out effort was splendid. But I still probably won't be watching much of it until the next world cup.
Posted by: Jim Rhoads f/k/a vnjagvet | July 13, 2014 at 06:30 PM
No, I never saw this coming:
http://weaselzippers.us/193094-georgia-gop-house-candidate-urges-democrats-to-vote-for-him-to-stop-his-too-radical-opponent/
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2014 at 06:31 PM
Thank goodness my ex's PI never installed a GPS tracker on my Jaguar. Or found the thumb drives taped to the interior underside of my locked office desk. Or... Okay, I'll shut up.
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 06:32 PM
What's the Venn diagram look like between the rioting and the crying?
Posted by: lyle | July 13, 2014 at 06:32 PM
Beasts, not as sweet as the last US goal but beautifully done. (I've only seen a handful of better goals than Green's score v Belgium).
Lowry & Ponnuru think the Tea Party and GOPe are merging. They also think Cochran's moves bogus.
Miss M, no experience to add, but whatever happens don't blame yourself. You have lots more positive things to contribute to your family and community. My prayers for a path that puts you at ease.
Posted by: henry | July 13, 2014 at 06:34 PM
My first divorce cost me $66. My second, $4300. The geometric progression from there keeps me married...
Posted by: lyle | July 13, 2014 at 06:36 PM
My first divorce cost me $66.
My only divorce cost me the filing fee ($0 -- see previous thread). There will be no others.
Posted by: DrJ | July 13, 2014 at 06:43 PM
Be careful about extrapolating from domestic divorces to a situation where the person suing is not physically present in the US, chose to inform MM after he left US jurisdiction but clearly knew this while he was here, and may have an employer with no real jurisdictional presence in the US.
She needs good experienced advice initially to assess where she is and what the real ability will be long term to enforce any agreement that is consented to.
Posted by: rse | July 13, 2014 at 06:43 PM
I agree with henry great WC (except for the 2 semis), and today s game was compelling. Best team won the Tourney.
Posted by: NKonIPad | July 13, 2014 at 06:44 PM
Yes the Spurs were the best team and obviously deserved to win.
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2014 at 06:50 PM
I feel that MM has extended us the trust of a private family circumstance and JOMers have extended sympathy, support, and heartfelt advice. I would feel uncomfortable if her personal circumstance became a topic of discussion.
Perhaps we could return to just being here any time she wants us and help her otherwise by carrying on as we do about other issues to help her get some well-deserved respite.
Posted by: sbw | July 13, 2014 at 06:52 PM
"She needs good experienced advice initially to assess where she is and what the real ability will be long term to enforce any agreement that is consented to."
Miss Marple,
I hope you read RSE's advice very carefully. The emotional trauma you are suffering can be compounded by poor legal advice and an expensive good attorney can be the cheapest bargain you'll ever find.
My thoughts and prayers are with you.
Posted by: Rick B | July 13, 2014 at 06:56 PM
Excellent advice by sbw imo.
Posted by: Captain Hate | July 13, 2014 at 06:56 PM
Best candidate, CH.
Posted by: Threadkiller | July 13, 2014 at 06:57 PM
One problem with the Reynolds article. He is 100% correct that we are dealing with a global nomenklatura intent on political power to gut individual autonomy in the traditional sense.
But why on earth call Greece a capitalist country. The poor woman had a problem because Greece is operating as a License Raj. That's not capitalism. It's about preventing it for the benefit of the public sector.
Posted by: rse | July 13, 2014 at 06:57 PM
Miss Marple's announcement
God will not fail you, dear MM. Lots of prayers for you and yours, especially for wisdom.
Posted by: DebinNC | July 13, 2014 at 07:03 PM
It is very important in what jib accurately calls a 2nd Civil War to be careful about the language used. We are going to have to use the narrative and good examples of why what is being pushed has had and likely will continue to have those same consequences to educate LIVs on why what is being sought harms them in the long term as well. I would argue it is harming them now. They simply do not perceive it yet.
Posted by: rse | July 13, 2014 at 07:04 PM
Are those of y'all calling it a second civil war interested in immediate impeachment?
Posted by: Beasts of England | July 13, 2014 at 07:09 PM