The WaPo editors deplore Obama's "half measures" in Iraq:
Obama’s authorization of Iraq airstrikes isn’t connected to a coherent strategy
And even the NY Times editors, while applauding Obama's prudence and restraint, are looking for more:
The United States, Turkey and other allies should move quickly to meet the Kurds’ needs for ammunition and weapons as well as advice on more effectively deploying the pesh merga and integrating Kurdish operations with Iraqi security forces. Under pressure from the United States, Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of Iraq finally agreed this week to cooperate with the Kurds and to provide air support, and should continue to do so.
That will still leave Mr. Obama with the task of framing a broader strategy that involves Saudi Arabia, the Arab League and the United Nations, just to start.
Yeah, a unified strategy. Why that is urgent now as opposed to two months ago remains a Frequently Unasked Question.
THEY WHO SHALL NOT BE NAMED: The US is implicitly partnering up with Shiite Iran against Sunni ISIS. Politics, bedfellows.
That poll seemed to backfire.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 02:29 PM
Nice, Rick & Iggy; the Minutemen ran through my mind on their way to the square.
Posted by: You can imagine a scenario where 'You could'. | August 09, 2014 at 02:29 PM
Welcome to the club, PD.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 09, 2014 at 02:30 PM
I could do so only to save my own life or that of a family member, and not otherwise.
The Minutemen knew that they were placing their own lives in grave danger. I've got to see something a lot more tyrannical than what happened at Bundy's ranch before I commit murder.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 02:33 PM
Self-defense is not murder.
Posted by: So I've heard lawyers say. | August 09, 2014 at 02:34 PM
Still missing PD in Detroit.
Posted by: Amusing to contemplate his response. | August 09, 2014 at 02:38 PM
"The fetish of complexity, the trick of making hard decisions harder to make; the art, finally, of rationalizing the non-decision, have made a ruin of American foreign policy."
--stuff Ronald Reagan said 46 years ago
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | August 09, 2014 at 02:40 PM
Kim,
Arming Weights and Measures agents with automatic weapons should elicit an assessment of the intent of our servants. Watching Boston's highly trained (don't snicker) security forces ventilate a parked boat, followed by the suspect's exit on two feet, should also elicit an assessment.
2010 Bostonians may have been content with following Cower in Place edicts but Obama's Fresshit Army force would be unwise to think the reaction to be endemic.
Posted by: Rick B | August 09, 2014 at 02:43 PM
Oops, may have left myself open there. Self defense is not prosecutable, justly, as murder. Intent has much to do with whether killing is wrong.
I think I just object to oT's lazy use of 'murder'. He can surely imagine a scenario in which he would not consider it murder.
Posted by: 'lazy' is not quite the mot juste. Substitute your own. | August 09, 2014 at 02:46 PM
We had an incident some months ago where a friend and local pillar of the community leased his office space right in the core of the touristy downtown area to ICE. The progs nearly took up arms (and issued death threats to the owner) because of the 'negative optics' it presented. The local conservatives were appalled at the lack of property rights consideration and the free market aspects, as well as the total dependence our local economy has on tourism. (We're the main stopping point in or out of the Great NW.)
It was about the same time as the Bundy incident, so the alternate consideration of whether the ICE people would end up on the other side of a fight was foremost in my mind. The punchline: they are 'local' with families and would likely stand down, if it came to that. The alternative of standing against the community immediately puts their families at risk. A hard decision that will have to be made 10's of thousands of time across the country if the SHTF.
Posted by: Man Tran on iPhone | August 09, 2014 at 02:47 PM
theree's this new history of the prelude to the American revolution Independence by Thomas Slaughter, and it shows the roots of grievances go back quite a way, dealing with
British troops, the source of the 3rd amendment
goes back to 1699, the costs incurred by the French and Indian wars, the largest part involving the campaign in India, the reasons
for the Stamp Act, a crony capitalist, named MacIntosh, and how events even after the massacre and the tea party changed the calculus,
Posted by: narciso | August 09, 2014 at 02:49 PM
McMinn County War, Athens, Tennessee, August 1946
The McMinn County War, also called the Battle of Athens, was the name given to an outbreak of violence as returning GIs from World War II clashed with entrenched political interests in order to deliver the county from a corrupt system. Incumbent political-machine politician Paul Cantrell ran for sheriff again in 1946 after spending four years in the Tennessee State Senate.
His crony, Pat Mansfield, had been sheriff in his absence and had cooperated with Cantrell in corrupting the local government. Among other things, they had implemented a system of fees that paid local officials for the number of people they arrested.
Returning WWII soldiers, numbering near 3,000 in 1946 (about 10% of the area's population), were fed up with the current method of justice. Ex-GI Knox Henry ran against Cantrell, and other GIs ran for several other positions in the local government.
On Election Day, August 1, 1946, two hundred armed deputies loyal to Cantrell watched the polls, physically beating GIs and a black man attempting to vote. A crowd gathered as deputies moved the ballot box to the local jail. The angry GIs took weapons from the local armory and fired upon the jail for half an hour until ammunition ran low.
The deputies in the jail surrendered at about 2 a.m. when the GIs began to lob dynamite, destroying the jail�s porch. In the precincts free of voter fraud, the GI candidates, including Knox Henry, won the election by nearly 60%.
By morning all violence had stopped. On that very day a governing council was set up and six men were chosen to police the county in the absence of the regular police, who had fled. After the certification of their victory, local GIs changed the method of payment of officials by limiting their salaries to $5,000, replaced county employees who resigned, and scoured out corruption in the government . . . and, yes, they also repaired the jail.
http://www.tennessee.gov/tsla/exhibits/disasters/riots.htm
Seems only logical that the government historian would file this under "disaster."
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 02:49 PM
Heh, R, distributed intelligence vs focussed intelligence. Fortunately, I don't think it will come to that in a massive way. There will enough more Ruby Ridges and Wacos to bring us to our senses.
Posted by: Sure hope so. | August 09, 2014 at 02:50 PM
As I say, I would not consider it murder if it were needed to save my own life or that of a family member.
There has been quite a bit of talk here lately of armed insurrection. No such thing will occur in my lifetime.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 02:55 PM
n., I'm almost always amused at the reaction when I tell people that the American Revolution was caused by ungrateful colonials unwilling to pay their fair share of national security costs.
Posted by: I knew we burned Joan of Arc, but George Washington? | August 09, 2014 at 03:00 PM
Congrats to you and your better half on becoming grandparents, PD!
Posted by: Thomas Collins | August 09, 2014 at 03:02 PM
JiB, you better not let the kid down.
Posted by: clarice | August 09, 2014 at 03:02 PM
If limited to the US, I would agree with you, oT. Then again, we can argue size. Was Waco an AA? How about RR?
Posted by: Think of the grandchildren. | August 09, 2014 at 03:03 PM
AI, not AA. Armed Insurrection.
=================
Posted by: More Joe | August 09, 2014 at 03:04 PM
Oops.
Posted by: Bye for now. | August 09, 2014 at 03:05 PM
ManT: ICE=In Comes Everybody
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | August 09, 2014 at 03:06 PM
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/351062.php POSOTUS wanted to leave troops in Iraq all along, but what could he do? AxelJarrett made him campaign otherwise.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | August 09, 2014 at 03:09 PM
I hate commercial air travel with a passion. Hijacking. TSA. Waiting forever. I love private air travel, although with my Dad's passing, I don't have the awesome connection I once had. But, I wouldn't want to travel too far in a Stearman - it messed up my hair something fierce.
p.s. Proud to say my golf swing is exactly like Rory's. Only different...
p.p.s. Good looking trophy for a fine young man, JiB!
Posted by: Beasts of England | August 09, 2014 at 03:10 PM
>>>In other words, Mrs. PD and I are now grandparents. :-)
Posted by: PD | August 09, 2014 at 10:55 AM <<<
congratulations.
beasts-
that plane ride sounded like fun.
in re: Bundy's comments. how is it all that different from left, right, and center commentary regarding militarized police forces and no knock raids. Or even the Steyn piece linked earlier (with the keeper ... official US government documents not accepted at this official US government outpost).
Posted by: rich@gmu | August 09, 2014 at 03:14 PM
"Was Waco an AA?"
Yes. A strictly localized one by members of a fanatical religious cult.
"How about RR?"
I don't know. According to Weaver, the feds shot first. A subsequent DoJ task force was unable to reach a conclusion.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 03:17 PM
Thanks, rich! Wish I could have talked Amanda in to going up, but, she won the party last night and was looking kinda green even on terra firma.
Posted by: Beasts of England | August 09, 2014 at 03:23 PM
"how is it all that different from left, right, and center commentary regarding militarized police forces and no knock raids"
I think Bundy is thus far the only one to call on the nation's sheriffs to disarm the feds.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 03:24 PM
The Declaration of Independence sets forth a very lengthy list of grievances justifying the revolution. The levying of taxes "without our consent" is the only mention of taxation.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 03:28 PM
Bundy request can only be interpreted as a non-legislative request.
It is more fun that way.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 03:40 PM
Eyewitness accounts are less persuasive than inconclusive DoJ reports.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 03:41 PM
I have to squint very hard not to see quartering troops as taxation. That would be in addition to the colonials sharing their British cousins fervent distrust of maintaining standing armies. Mistrust engendered by the potential for abuse of security forces isn't a particularly new concept.
Posted by: Rick B | August 09, 2014 at 03:46 PM
Now we know!
http://poorrichardsnews.com/post/94263430688/obama-suggests-that-conservatives-are-the-greatest
Posted by: Pagar | August 09, 2014 at 03:47 PM
beasts-
feeling kinda green myself.
Posted by: rich@gmu | August 09, 2014 at 03:49 PM
I was just looking at the aircraft museum website that I linked to earlier and discovered that the Stearman I flew in this morning was one of the planes used to train the Tuskegee Airmen. Not just the same type - one of the actual aircraft. Nice little piece of Alabama history!
Posted by: Beasts of England | August 09, 2014 at 03:52 PM
rich:
feeling kinda green myself.
You bought a Prius?
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | August 09, 2014 at 03:55 PM
You're probably not as green as the young lady in your text last night, rich! Or was that you hugging the floor? ;)
Posted by: Beasts of England | August 09, 2014 at 03:58 PM
"Eyewitness accounts are less persuasive than inconclusive DoJ reports."
The eyewitness accounts were contradictory.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 04:00 PM
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 03:24 PM-
Rep. Stewart of Utah has sponsored just that thing (his was more limited in scope, BLM and IRS for starters).
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/30/bundy-aftermath-utah-lawmaker-moves-to-disarm-blm-/
also the radio interview appears to be for a religiously active Mormon audience and the topic under discussion was Bundy's faith in the face of the BLM raid. inartful, but then I am not the target audience of the show.
Posted by: rich@gmu | August 09, 2014 at 04:06 PM
ha... she is 6 feet tall. very sexy.
Posted by: rich@gmu | August 09, 2014 at 04:07 PM
>>>You bought a Prius?
Posted by: hit and run | August 09, 2014 at 03:55 PM<<<
No it was BEER: The source of all my problems.
Posted by: rich@gmu | August 09, 2014 at 04:09 PM
It's not March, don't drink green beer.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | August 09, 2014 at 04:10 PM
Rich, that guy is proposing to disarm them through legislation. Strikes me as quite different from sending sheriffs out to do the job.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 04:10 PM
The interview, rich, was an attempt to trap Bundy with Mormonish quotes. The host botched it up and Bundy corrected him.
A narrative was then dropped into the Mainstream press to create a story which some were suckered into accepting as what actually happened.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 04:13 PM
Sheriff's don't gain authority through legislation.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 04:14 PM
The eyewitness accounts for RR were fairly consistent in one aspect: the Feds shot the wife in cold blood. While she was holding an infant child.
Posted by: lyle | August 09, 2014 at 04:14 PM
And, of course, the shooter was exonerated. Fancy that. Probably got a promotion or five.
Posted by: lyle | August 09, 2014 at 04:18 PM
Sheriffs...
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 04:21 PM
"Sheriff's don't gain authority through legislation."
Bundy made no mention of legislation.
Why do you insist on inventing stupid formulatios?
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 04:29 PM
No such thing will occur in my lifetime.
I prefer secession first and a negotiated settlement before bloodshed.
Btw, every time I read about a mistaken or excessive no-knock raid, I picture myself mowing down a dozen cops. Would that be murder?
Posted by: Extraneus | August 09, 2014 at 04:30 PM
"the Feds shot the wife in cold blood."
I hold no brief for the behavior of the feds at Ruby Ridge. I was simply discussing whether the event could be characterized as an armed insurrection. If the feds shot first, I would say it was not.if one of the inhabitants shot first and killed a deputy, I would call it murder, after which the FBI behaved recklessly and irresponsibly.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 04:36 PM
An Important Announcement From The Ministry Of Truth: Obama Always Wanted To Leave Troops In Iraq
Today:
October, 2011:
Posted by: Extraneus | August 09, 2014 at 04:37 PM
It's a good thing to question and stand up to the federal government.
I am appalled at our intelligence community.According to Obama ,he is blameless and the intel organization is at fault here. However all knowledgable say Intel people have been screaming for months for Bammy to do something. I guess before his vacation he figured he would make a token gesture so the media wouldn't excoriate him for his golf games while people were dying on a hill in Iraq.
As we all know it is ALWAYS what is best for Obama.
Posted by: maryrose | August 09, 2014 at 04:37 PM
"Would that be murder?"
Yes, unless you didn't know they were cops.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 04:39 PM
EXT:
It keeps coming up because it was Obama's dumb decision to remove all the troops as your quote from 2011 so aptly illustrates. He did it deliberately to use it as a talking point for hhis re-election. Just as he targeted conservatives to punish them for causing him to lose the House in the 2010 election. To boot he lied about Benghazi and Clinton going along with this fiction will cost her the White House in 2016. The dems have moved on-she will not be their candidate. The guy from Maryland has already publicly dissed this administration as he readies his campaign for the WH.
Posted by: maryrose | August 09, 2014 at 04:42 PM
@Extraneus: Is that an actual quote from the president today? I mean, the President of the United States? If so, I hate him even more than the Starland Vocal Band...
Posted by: Beasts of England | August 09, 2014 at 04:43 PM
the whole thing was precipitated for a failed attempt to involve weaver in a sting, unlike that nazgul, remember him who shot up a synagogue, if memory serves, he took the danegeld and the protection therein,
that fellow went down the memory hole fancy that, just like the fellow on the Iranian side,
Asghari was responsible for the death of Robert
Ames got a cushy gig and was the main source for the 2007 NIE
Posted by: narciso | August 09, 2014 at 04:43 PM
Not hearing Bundy mention legislation means he is against a legislative path.
Not hearing Bundy mention putting crosshairs on the head of a law enforcement officer means he is for putting crosshairs on the head of a law enforcement officer.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 04:47 PM
"Not hearing Bundy mention putting crosshairs on the head of a law enforcement officer means he is for putting crosshairs on the head of a law enforcement officer."
Right on cue, another idiotic formulation. I have said nothing about Bundy's position on shooting a law enforcement officer. I simply inquired how many here would do so. A few have said they would, given certain provocations that have not yet happened to them.
I note that TK has not responded.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 04:53 PM
2010 Bostonians may have been content with following Cower in Place edicts
Made the subsequent "Boston Strong!" chorus look rather silly, no?
Posted by: PD | August 09, 2014 at 04:57 PM
"Not hearing Bundy mention legislation means he is against a legislative path."
Most people who favored legislation to disarm federal officers would say so, and not skip directly to the sheriff phase. In any event, any such legislation would necessarily be federal legislation, and would not be enforced by sheriffs.
But keep digging....
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 05:02 PM
TK being non-responsible requires noting.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 05:10 PM
...non-responsive...
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 05:12 PM
I assume you mean non-responsive.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 05:12 PM
PD and RickB:
i totally agree. Show of force in Boston was overkill. To cower in place because of 1 person is unimaginable. Room-mate foubnd guilty- justice. Now we just need to get Berghdahl sorted.
Posted by: maryrose | August 09, 2014 at 05:19 PM
A TK-DoT spat on a thread makes it less desirable to stick around.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | August 09, 2014 at 05:19 PM
And yes I am trying to change the subject from Bundy.
Posted by: maryrose | August 09, 2014 at 05:20 PM
Where's Sophia when we really need her?
Posted by: Beasts of England | August 09, 2014 at 05:22 PM
I will never believe there will not be TK-DoT spats on JOM. Either side of said spats can claim whatever they want about giving up said spats. I won't believe him. We could go 10 years without a spat, and I would still believe that we're one provocation away from another spat.
If it weren't against Sue's JOM Style Guide, I'd tell you I was unsticking around again.
See you on the next JOM birthday.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | August 09, 2014 at 05:23 PM
(next JOM birthday is a grandkid, btw)
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | August 09, 2014 at 05:24 PM
Sorry, hit and Maryrose. I had hoped to generate a sensible discussion of the futility - and unlikelihood - of taking up arms against the federal government. It never really materialized, and I'm abandoning the effort.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 05:26 PM
A TK-DoT spat on a thread makes it less desirable to stick around.
Yes, even when the question is a good one.
How to deal with an oppressive federal government? Federal legislation.
What if they don't want to pass legislation to limit their own power? Law suits.
What if they get two more SC justices? State action? Sheriffs?
Seems like a reasonable discussion, not necessarily related to Bundy or Arpaio.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 09, 2014 at 05:27 PM
Since you're keeping track of those birthdays, too, ours was born on Dec. 2. She had the very good sense to be blue eyed, unlike most of the infidels around me. If I am lucky, I will be able to persuade her to be left handed as well. I doubt that I'll have much luck passing on the colorblindness, though probably that is for the best!
Posted by: PD | August 09, 2014 at 05:29 PM
Posting false stories regarding Bundy is the best way to create honest discussion regarding armed insurrection.
Not commenting about the post that describes the Armed insurrection in Athens, Georgia proves that the best intentions are to be believed.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 05:33 PM
Maryrose, note that the stay in place order in the Tsarnaev hunt was all hat and no cattle (not even a cold Big Mac). I had no trouble getting around Beantown, on car ir on foot, the stay of the stay in place "order". I think the real police effort was to keep people out of Watertown and nearby areas.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | August 09, 2014 at 05:42 PM
San Jose Police Dept. Spends Two Years Denying Any Interest In Drones Before Apologizing And Handing Over Documents
The following is from the link (didn't want to blockquote a blockquote):
The San Jose Police Department has spent more than two years denying it has a drone in its possession, having returned no responsive documents to MuckRock during its 2012 and 2013 "drone census" document requests. The drone the SJPD pretended to not have in its possession (until just recently) may have not been acquired until early 2014, but its grant application was actually submitted sometime prior to November 30, 2012. But this is how the SJPD responded during previous requests.
Unfortunately for the SJPD, its drone-acquisition activities were generating paperwork elsewhere -- documents it couldn't hide, like city council meeting minutes in which funding for an unmanned aerial vehicle was discussed.
Now, the SJPD has turned over all of its drone documents, along with an apology for hiding this information from the public.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 09, 2014 at 05:44 PM
PD:
Since you're keeping track of those birthdays, too, ours was born on Dec. 2.
OH! I'll stick around for that.
That's the best B-Day of all B-Days on JOM. Although our dear friend Topsecretk9 has long since left us, whose B-Day was on Dec 2 . . . Dec 2 remains the B-Day of JOM All Time Favorite Clarice *and* hit and run All Time Favorite mrs hit and run.
Grandgirl PD is now on The List as well.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | August 09, 2014 at 05:45 PM
Posted by: Extraneus | August 09, 2014 at 05:47 PM
OK, H&R, so as not to be put on the JOM rack, I will not point out which stay should have been day and what ir should have been.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | August 09, 2014 at 05:49 PM
Hit, I sincerely misunderstood your position on the Pavlovian response game.
Posted by: Threadkiller | August 09, 2014 at 05:49 PM
The PGA Championship is in fine form. Nine players within two strokes of leader McIlroy. And while I'm not a big fan of Valhalla holding a major, it's in perfect condition and delivering an exciting weekend of golf!
Posted by: Beasts of England | August 09, 2014 at 05:50 PM
WHITE STUDENTS TO NO LONGER BE MAJORITY AT SCHOOL
Wouldn't the white students then be minority students?
Posted by: Extraneus | August 09, 2014 at 05:53 PM
OBAMA: BAD INTELLIGENCE BEHIND ISIS UNDERESTIMATION
Aw. Bad intelligence? Harsh media criticism? lolPosted by: Extraneus | August 09, 2014 at 06:03 PM
bick·er
ˈbikər/
verb
gerund or present participle: bickering
1.
argue about petty and trivial matters.
"whenever the phone rings, they bicker over who must answer it"
synonyms: quarrel, argue, squabble, wrangle, fight, disagree, dispute, spar, have words, be at each other's throats, lock horns;
informal: scrap, spat
"they never bickered before they were married"
Posted by: Janet - the districts lie fallow, while the Capitol gorges itself | August 09, 2014 at 06:03 PM
DoT:
Sorry, hit
No need for that.
TK:
Hit, I sincerely misunderstood your position on the Pavlovian response game.
No need for that either.
I love you both.
It's just Tough Cheese all the way down.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | August 09, 2014 at 06:08 PM
Beasts I think they saved the best for the last major. Very nice logjam near the top.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 09, 2014 at 06:09 PM
well it's turtle's all down from Patrick, to Mumbles to the DA, whose previous exploits including a hacker to kill themselves, from the FBI to Tides to the BCIC, there were enough
signals on the T-Dawgs to light up I-95, yet they still couldn't point them out, or even now pick out who helped them build the bomb,
Posted by: narciso | August 09, 2014 at 06:09 PM
Ok, Beasts, I have to ask: is that a busted axle, or a steam fitting, or what?
I can see what might be wood coming off like a old prop, but it looks way funky.
Posted by: Man Tran on iPhone | August 09, 2014 at 06:10 PM
Phabulous Phil is now only one shot back!
Posted by: Beasts of England | August 09, 2014 at 06:12 PM
Beasts, you...have mail.
Posted by: Stephanie tortoise not the hare | August 09, 2014 at 06:13 PM
Lefty's on one of his back nine charges.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 09, 2014 at 06:15 PM
Come on Ricky!
Posted by: Stephanie tortoise not the hare | August 09, 2014 at 06:23 PM
Needless to say, the armed insurrection nearly 70 years ago had nothing to do with the federal government or federal agents.
I inquired as to how I had misrepresented Bundy, and still have seen no reply. Most of the item I posted is a direct quote attributed to Bundy.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 06:25 PM
@Man Tran: Propeller is correct. Not sure you can see the writing on it (can see it better if you click on my nic), but it says 'Sopwith Aviation Co. Ltd.'. A Clerget radial on a replica Sopwith triplane I saw this morning.
Posted by: Beasts of England | August 09, 2014 at 06:32 PM
Cliven Bundy:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/03/cliven-bundy-iap-god-civil-war-_n_5646121.html
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 06:36 PM
they don't buy that silly story, if beating ISIS and Nusra Front was a thing, we would be sharing intel with Bashir, not fronting the Saudi/Qatari's hand picked men
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/09/obama-has-no-plan-to-beat-isis.html
Posted by: narciso | August 09, 2014 at 06:38 PM
Cliven Bundy:
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/58267899-90/agents-armed-battle-blm.html.csp
Posted by: Danube on iPad | August 09, 2014 at 06:40 PM
When Rory gets pressured he really bears down and sticks it. I like Jason Day but have zero confidence in him when he gets close to the lead; hopefully the reverse jinx will work for him.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 09, 2014 at 06:41 PM
Flag pole with Old Glory & Kurdish Flag -- CHECK
Empty Chair -- CHECK
Arabic letter nuun and #WeAreN -- CHECK

Posted by: Sandy--Engorged Capital~Fallow Districts--Daze | August 09, 2014 at 06:42 PM
ISIS in Mosul Marks Christian Homes, Patriarch Issues Urgent Appeal
Posted by: Sandy--Engorged Capital~Fallow Districts--Daze | August 09, 2014 at 06:44 PM
That sums it up well, Sandy.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 09, 2014 at 06:45 PM