Johnny Waffles rallies our allies to, well, something or other:
Kerry: ISIS not a 'war'
Kerry said the administration's plan to combat ISIS includes "many different things that one doesn't think of normally in context of war" during an interview with CNN.
"What we are doing is engaging in a very significant counterterrorism operation," Kerry said. "It's going to go on for some period of time. If somebody wants to think about it as being a war with ISIL, they can do so, but the fact is it's a major counterterrorism operation that will have many different moving parts."
In a separate interview with CBS News, Kerry also rejected the word "war" to describe the U.S. effort and encouraged the public not to "get into war fever" over the conflict.
"We're engaged in a major counterterrorism operation, and it's going to be a long-term counterterrorism operation. I think war is the wrong terminology and analogy but the fact is that we are engaged in a very significant global effort to curb terrorist activity," Kerry told the network.
"I don't think people need to get into war fever on this. I think they have to view it as a heightened level of counterterrorist activity ... but it's not dissimilar similar to what we've been doing the last few years with al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan and in Yemen and elsewhere," he added.
"Not dissimilar" to ther drone wars in Yemen and Somalia - even the Times choked on that; from Peter Baker:
In his speech, Mr. Obama tried to equate the emerging strategy to the way he has pursued terrorist cells in Yemen and Somalia. Aides said that by working with local forces on the ground and targeting leaders from the air, the United States had been able to damage extremist groups without occupying territory or engaging in costly nation building, although some former officials like Mr. Pavel noted that terrorist groups remained in both countries.
But what Mr. Obama has in mind for Iraq and Syria goes beyond that approach. By some counts, the United States under Mr. Obama has conducted a dozen or so lethal strikes in Somalia in recent years and about 100 in Yemen. Even at the height of the drone war in Pakistan, Americans conducted fewer than 120 strikes in a single year, 2010, and were down to seven so far this year, according to the Long War Journal.
By contrast, the air campaign against ISIS that Mr. Obama ordered in Iraq has involved 154 strikes in the course of a month — far fewer than necessary in the view of some hawks, but far more than the occasional attacks on satellite terror groups in Africa and Arabia. And that was before Mr. Obama officially expanded the mission to destroying ISIS and effectively erased the border with Syria to send warplanes there as well.
Whatever. Next, maybe Kerry will rally allies for our non-war by promising that any action will be "unbelievably small". Yeah, that'll show our commitment!
The Times noted that our Arab allies seem a bit tentative. No kidding - Obama and Kerry were wrong about the surge in '07, wrong about the Iraqi troop withdrawals in '11, wrong to walk away from post-Qadaffi Libya in '11, wrong not to arm the moderate Syrian rebels in '11, wrong to draw a faux red line in 2013, and now no one will get behind him? The headless chickens have come home to roost.
WELL, YES: "How do you ask a man to be the first man to die for a mistake?" - Kerry, any day now.
Firsty
Posted by: GMax | September 12, 2014 at 11:42 AM
At least he still has the hat to this day.
Posted by: MarkO | September 12, 2014 at 11:45 AM
--Kerry: ISIS not a 'war'--
For the ultimate Santayana moment he can put on his magic hat and tell us it's just an "incursion".
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 11:46 AM
Rod Dreher excusing the feeding of crocs;
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/us-conservative-contempt-for-arab-christians/
Posted by: narciso | September 12, 2014 at 11:54 AM
Anyone familiar with kerry and obama will be very, very reluctant to form a war coalition with them. They will never get the international support GW Bush got because they cannot be trusted the way W could.
Posted by: Jim | September 12, 2014 at 11:57 AM
Would you send a child to fight under the command of Obama and Kerry?
Hell no, we won't go?
Posted by: MarkO | September 12, 2014 at 12:00 PM
I'd be OK with the First Occupoopers providing sandals on the ground in Iraq and Syria. Under UN/Coexist banners, of course.
Posted by: Rick B | September 12, 2014 at 12:12 PM
MarkO:
Would you send a child to fight under the command of Obama and Kerry?
"How do you ask a man to be the first man to die for a mistake?"
--stuff Kerry (almost) said, way back when
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | September 12, 2014 at 12:16 PM
yes, but that faction would more likely be joining ISIS, consider that Canadian 9/11 denialist Poulin, who's big in their recruiting efforts,
Posted by: narciso | September 12, 2014 at 12:17 PM
we have a winner Iggy at 11:46
Posted by: peter | September 12, 2014 at 12:22 PM
Is there any evidence 404 and Clutch Cargo trust each other?
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 12, 2014 at 12:28 PM
Dreher accurately describes the Maronite/Coptic/Orthodox perspective. As to his conclusions about motives and purposes, who knows? But apparently Cruz supporters and critics alike think I'm naive to assume Cruz did not deliberately call out the meeting participants. I wonder if Dreher attended this maronite Church in Brooklyn, I went to a fair number of weddings and baptisms there in the 1980s, it is a stunning church-- the first scene in Prizzi's Honor was filmed there: http://ololc.org/
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 12:28 PM
How nice. The MSM has Christians throwing rocks at each other. While I do not like the anti-semitism on display, I am more concerned with the head chopping going on right now (not worried that some chopees are not Christian). Who ever is doing it must be stopped. Quibbles over the Judean Peoples Front vs the Peoples Front of Judea do not stop the head choppers.
Posted by: henry | September 12, 2014 at 12:28 PM
narciso,
Did you see this editorial note from Rod Dreher in comments:
I'm not defending the Arab Christians' antipathy for Israel. As far as I can tell, some of it is justified, most of it is just anti-Semitism. What I'm objecting to is Cruz using this opportunity to change the subject from Christian persecution to the wrongthink of Arab Christians on the subject of Israel. It was as if he baited those people. I do not believe the persecuted Christians of that region are worth caring about only insofar as they love Israel. Do you?
It's interesting that a statement of how two groups share a common threat, and not a minor threat, but one that involves mass extermination and genocide, would get twisted into "I do not believe the persecuted Christians of that region are worth caring about only insofar as they love Israel."
How many logical fallacies did Rod have to jump through to get there?
What Rod, and the people he is defending, are missing is akin to someone telling a audience of Frenchman in the late 30's that they ought to understand that their interests are shared by Poland, and being met with "boo!". Nobody would infer any nuanced meaning other than the audience didn't particularly like Poles and to their own peril.
It's all complicated and nuanced until some insane despot makes things clearer.
Posted by: Some Guy | September 12, 2014 at 12:30 PM
amen henry. but it is an ancient and complex situation for the christians in the holy land, syria, northern egypt, turkey (greater) and Iraq.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 12:31 PM
That Dreher column is remarkably stupid, even meeting the DoT "jackal" test;
What's especially odd is people like Dreher don't seem to understand why it hurts the cause of ME Christians to simultaneously come here to justifiably cry out for assistance as persecuted religious minorities amongst the muslims while simultaneously apparently supporting the persecution of another religious minority by the same religion.
It especially undermines their position to support monstrous regimes like Assad and Hezbollah simply because they protect, or at least don't slaughter them for political purposes.
They end up looking unflatteringly and perhaps unfairly somewhat like the "official" state sanctioned churches of the old Soviet bloc and China.
Rome wasn't Christianized by the early church by reaching a political accommodation with Caesar.
None of that means we should have any less sympathy for or do less [would it be possible to do less] to stop the persecution of ME Christians. But they'd help their cause and be doing the right thing if they remembered it was a Jew who extended His love to the gentile world that saved them in the first place and they might consider that in who they make common cause with.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 12:31 PM
@12:30 I agree with the last sentence and that conclusion. But the French-Pole analogy is not accurate. More accurate would be Churchill telling the French in February 1940 (during the 'phony war') that:
"You French must love the Poles and Poland, otherwise you are friends of the Nazis."
Of course Churchill said know such thing, the French were allies and that would have bee counterproductive.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 12:36 PM
"You French must love the Poles and Poland, otherwise you are friends of the Nazis."
Please quote the exact equivalent from Cruz' remarks.
Posted by: Some Guy | September 12, 2014 at 12:40 PM
Even God wouldn't waste His time commanding Frenchmen to love anyone but Frenchmen. :)
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM
I must confess that I do not know what my jackal test is.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | September 12, 2014 at 12:53 PM
Ig, imagine how scary it would be for an audience of Poles at the time hearing, "Poland has no greater ally than France."
Posted by: Some Guy | September 12, 2014 at 12:57 PM
"Jackal Test" sounds like a Bond villain's henchman...
Posted by: Some Guy | September 12, 2014 at 12:58 PM
There are a fair number of antisemitic people in this country, most of whom are nominally Christian. Since few among them are principled conservatives, the majority of these people would reflexively attack Cruz over this.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 12, 2014 at 01:01 PM
@12:52-- that's exactly what happened yesterday, telling a bunch of ME christians that they must love Israel and the Jews, is at best a waste and for some of that audience, provocative. I am in the minority, but I still assume it was not meant by Cruz as a provacation, instead it is his pat speech (a sincere speech) about the common interests of christians and jews against the savages, but it riled up the obnoxious or worse members of that audience.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:02 PM
but it riled up the obnoxious or worse members of that audience.
And that's a mistake because...
I posted this at the end of dying thread, so will repost.
From narc's link, that "conservative" Ross Douthat tweets:
As Harsanyi points out, there is only one state in the ME that doesn't discriminate against or persecute Christians. Three guesses and the first two don't count.
Posted by: jimmyk | September 12, 2014 at 01:06 PM
@12:52-- that's exactly what happened yesterday,
NK, his remarks weren't very long, it should have taken less than 15 seconds to produce a quote. Unless, of course nothing he said was remotely like your assertion.
Since you have to "restate" his remarks to make your point, perhaps you should rethink your point.
Posted by: Some Guy | September 12, 2014 at 01:10 PM
Sorry JimmyK, but Douhat happens to be correct. Does the IDF protect syrian or Egyptian christians? rhetorical question obviously, for those people their greatest source of armed protection are the professional Syrian and Egyptian militaries(disloyal and unreliable protection, but it's all they've got).
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:11 PM
Betcha if Cruz had said "If you hate the Muslim people, you are not reflecting the teachings of Christ", no one (at the conference) would have batted an eye.
Posted by: AliceH | September 12, 2014 at 01:12 PM
I'm with Ig at 12:31.
I don't think, based on the transcript posted in the prior thread, that Cruz said anything objectionable or incorrect. Maybe it wasn't perfectly nuanced and pitched for the audience, but over the last six years, I've come to value nuance less and less every single day.
Maybe if we had more blunt truth-telling over the last six (or maybe the last 25) years, this country, and the world at large, wouldn't have some of the problems we now face.
Posted by: James D. | September 12, 2014 at 01:13 PM
This dispute between various ME Christian sects is really nothing new. There has been near riots between monks of the different sects at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem for centuries.
Here is a article on it that makes clear this goes back centuries:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07/04/christian-monks-square-off-at-one-of-jerusalem-s-holiest-sites.html
Posted by: GMax | September 12, 2014 at 01:14 PM
for those people their greatest source of armed protection ...
Protection from Jews? from Israel? I can't figure it out. Protection from what exactly?
Posted by: AliceH | September 12, 2014 at 01:15 PM
Protection = from the jihadi head choppers, and plain old armed bandits and gangsters. The ME is not a nice place, never has been.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:19 PM
Michel Aoun Maronite Christians in Lebanon are part of the coalition that includes Hezbollah ( I think the Druse are in the coalition too ).
I have never understood Aoun so I will likely not quite get these ME Christians of undefined sects that booed for someone telling them the truth, whether they wished to hear it or not.
Posted by: GMax | September 12, 2014 at 01:22 PM
I'll let Cruz answer my own (sarcastic) question:
"...the very same people who persecute and murder Christians right now, who crucify Christians, who behead children, are the very same people who target Jews for their faith, for the same reason.”
Israel fights those who persecute Christians. That is what makes Israel an ally. And, frankly, Israel and the IDF do much much more than the US does on that front. How can Israel NOT be seen as an ally? Only by running it through a filter of anti-Zionism and antisemitism.
Posted by: AliceH | September 12, 2014 at 01:25 PM
This isn't lecturing faithful christians about what Jesus commands them to do? lecturing christians about faith whose devotion to Jesus stretches back over 1800 years? whose devotion isn't challenged by obnoxious media accounts and godless Hollywood like us fat and happy americans, no, these people and their kin have their devotion to jesus challenged by murderous savages with guns and swords. The more I read these words the more deliberate and provactive they are. the audacity:
" Let me say this, those who hate Israel, hates America. And those who hate Jews, hate Christians. And if this room will not recognize that, then my heart weeps, that the men and women here will not stand in solidarity with Jews and Christians alike who are persecuted by radicals [applause] who seek to — [applause]. If you hate the Jewish people you are not reflecting the teachings of Christ [applause]. And the very same people who persecute and murder Christians right now, who crucify Christians and behead Children are the very same people who target and murder Jews for their faith for the very same reason."
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:26 PM
So "ally" only means immediate (albeit unreliable) protection from local headchoppers in exchange for loyalty, dhimmi taxes, and who knows what else? There are shopkeepers ins South Philly that get that kind of "protection," but I don't know if they consider the protectors their "greatest allies."
Posted by: jimmyk | September 12, 2014 at 01:27 PM
NK - do you understand that "those who hate" in the first 2 sentences is referring to Islamic extremists, such as Hamas and Hezbollah?
Posted by: AliceH | September 12, 2014 at 01:31 PM
Interestingly, Douthat and Dreher may have successfully made me rethink this entire issue.
How did Dreher put it? I do not believe the persecuted Christians of that region are worth caring about only insofar as they love Israel. Do you?
Well, should I care about potential victims of slaughter, if said victims don't care about potential victims of slaughter other than themselves?
Should I care for, and dedicate blood and treasure, to a religious minority, that doesn't respect a different religious minority nor one they would dedicate any blood and treasure to protect?
Should we risk anything to a group that is ambivalent (best case?) to the only country in the region that wouldn't sell them out to ISIS?
Yes, like all good writers, they got me rethinking my outlook on this. Is that what they wanted?
Posted by: Some Guy | September 12, 2014 at 01:33 PM
jimmyk-- you're starting to get it. The syrian and egyptian militaries are unreliable and unfriendly (and expensive) protection. it is pitiful that it is all these people have,and it is mortally insufficient. That's why hundreds of thousands of ME christians have been murdered or forced out of their homes in just the lst 2 decades. It is genocidal. This group is trying to educate the sects that a common front that allies with the USA and Israel is the only way to survive. I wish this group luck, because extinction of the christians in the home of Christ their savior is the only alternative.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:35 PM
NK, so you're now having to rely on Cruz' response to the boos and obvious hatred, and post hoc claim that was the provocation?
Come on.
Posted by: Some Guy | September 12, 2014 at 01:38 PM
NK,
At sw point you stopped arguing their boos was over being lectured to. I guess you have decided, along with the rest of us, that they booed because they dislike Jews.
Posted by: Sue | September 12, 2014 at 01:38 PM
Sw=some
Posted by: Sue | September 12, 2014 at 01:39 PM
NK,
What's with the 1,800 years number you're using?
Posted by: Jim Eagle | September 12, 2014 at 01:40 PM
@1:33-- ME christian genocide? They brought it on themselves, why should we care. There are historical analogies to that kind of opinion. They are not pretty.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:41 PM
JiB-- the Egyptian Copts have been an organized sect dating back to the 3rd century and beyond to St Mark. They are our bridge to Christ: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coptic_history
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:46 PM
NK,
I see now why you are having trouble with Cruz. You read into things that aren't said. Some Guy didn't even come close to saying what you attributed to him.
Posted by: Sue | September 12, 2014 at 01:47 PM
the @1:14 link is a primer on the volatile nature of ME christian sects and their historical fractures. organizing those sects for their own mutual defense is a massively complex task. Lecturing the sects about their faith in a public meeting is at best thoughtly counterproductive, at worst, deliberately provactive. Which happened here?
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:52 PM
... thoughtlessly..
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:53 PM
Do we know for sure Copts were in the room? What exactly do we know about the makeup of the group? I admit that I have no clue on these questions, beyond the amorphous Middle East Christians which includes an incredible number of potential groups, and I suppose might even be expanded to Armenians.
Posted by: GMax | September 12, 2014 at 01:53 PM
I'm hoping it was deliberate. Because until now I had no idea that ME Christians hated Jews.
Posted by: Sue | September 12, 2014 at 01:55 PM
Don't know the roster of attendees, I assume Copt clergy and lay leaders, plus maronites were present, and 'ME' would likely include Armenians and greater Turkey.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:56 PM
I didn't know Helen Thomas claimed the Christian faith. Nothing she ever said or did was a witness for Christ. I thought at best she was athiest or agnostic or even leaning towards Islam.
Posted by: Sue | September 12, 2014 at 01:58 PM
Obama and Rice know better:
"Such a mission was not the U.S. military’s preferred option. Responding to a White House request for options to confront the Islamic State, Gen. Lloyd Austin, the top commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, said that his best military advice was to send a modest contingent of American troops, principally Special Operations forces, to advise and assist Iraqi army units in fighting the militants, according to two U.S. military officials. The recommendation, conveyed to the White House by Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was cast aside in favor of options that did not involve U.S. ground forces in a front-line role, a step adamantly opposed by the White House. Instead, Obama had decided to send an additional 475 U.S. troops to assist Iraqi and ethnic Kurdish forces with training, intelligence and equipment."
Posted by: Danube on iPad | September 12, 2014 at 01:59 PM
Here's their 'summit' website. Very broad tent, they invited all who would come: http://www.idcsummit.org/register/
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:59 PM
I read somewhere else (either AoS or WZ) that the crowd was infiltrated with CAIR types and the spokesman for the group hosting it may have been unaware of their presence.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 12, 2014 at 02:00 PM
How can you be a Christian and hate the very religion that Christ came from? He wasn't a Christian. He was of the Jewish faith.
Posted by: Sue | September 12, 2014 at 02:00 PM
@1:33-- ME christian genocide? They brought it on themselves, why should we care. There are historical analogies to that kind of opinion. They are not pretty.
WOW.
Just WOW.
That's actually as vile as it is ignorant.
Posted by: Some Guy | September 12, 2014 at 02:02 PM
DoT,
I can see Rice, ValJar, Obama and Hagel sitting down for a lunch of arugala and Triple Whoppers planning the air strikes ala McGeorge Bundy and LBJ:)
Posted by: Jim Eagle | September 12, 2014 at 02:05 PM
Remember when "outsourcing" at Tora Bora was a national disgrace (according to the lefties)? And now, we're doing the same thing except we're not even using the special operators? Okaayyyyy . . .
And how would you feel about joining an alliance where the leader not only refuses to accept any risk of ground combat, but also is afraid even to call it "war"? Hey, sign me up!
Posted by: Cecil Turner | September 12, 2014 at 02:05 PM
CecilT-- very true. There will be dozens of examples of the naked hypocracy of the Obamaniacs and their media teammates while the bombs fall over syria.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 02:09 PM
[ END
LESSthis COUNTERTERRORISM OPERATION ] hardly even fits on a Prius.Posted by: Dave (in MA) | September 12, 2014 at 02:10 PM
I gotta start looking at the screen when I type these things... hypocracy?
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 02:12 PM
From the IDC site:
(my emphasis)Leaving Israel out in that last sentence speaks volumes to me.
Posted by: AliceH | September 12, 2014 at 02:13 PM
--I must confess that I do not know what my jackal test is.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | September 12, 2014 at 12:53 PM --
I was facetiously referring to the conversation you and CH had a week or two go about conservatives calling each other jackals or acting like jackals or something. I know jackals and Cruz were involved somehow and now here we have Dreher calling Cruz and others the J word. :)
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 02:15 PM
Is today the day of the jackal?
Posted by: MarkO | September 12, 2014 at 02:15 PM
daddy,
You have a rich imagination.
Posted by: MarkO | September 12, 2014 at 02:20 PM
From the head of this group IDC, a statement released yesterday but published today says in part:
Sadly, there was a small but vocal anti-Israel element in the room. Those individuals do not represent the views of IDC. In fact, there were many more people shouting down the hecklers than there were hecklers. The hecklers who did not remove themselves were removed by security.
“Senator Cruz abruptly ended his remarks accusing some participants of being ‘consumed with hate.’ That was as unfortunate as the inappropriate reaction by a small number of attendees.
If indeed it was but a small vocal minority who do not represent the IDC, I feel somewhat better about ME Christians. The defensive launched by Dreher makes we wonder though if that is the case. Douchebag, he is just looking for something anything to attack conservatives on to earn a bone from his captors at the NYT.
Posted by: GMax | September 12, 2014 at 02:22 PM
[email protected]:17... and I am going to have to examine the imagery in your comment more closely.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 02:22 PM
the AmCon people, had their trapper keeper's out for Volodya, not too long ago, before the Crimean repo team moved into town,
Posted by: narciso | September 12, 2014 at 02:23 PM
[email protected]:52-- that's exactly what happened yesterday, telling a bunch of ME christians that they must love Israel and the Jews, is at best a waste and for some of that audience, provocative.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 01:02 PM--
I'm gonna assume God expects the average guy who claims to follow Him to behave a tad better than the average Frenchman.
If telling your Christian brothers, wherever they're from, to love Israel and the Jews, who are not their enemies, is either a waste of time or provocative to a group, one of whose core tenets is, love not just your neighbor but your enemy, then the fault lies not with Cruz but the Druze.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 02:25 PM
The IDC group prez-- toughest cat herding job in the world. I wish him luck, otherwise it's extinction.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 02:27 PM
Blessed are those who shout down the opinions of those who annoy them.
Posted by: MarkO | September 12, 2014 at 02:28 PM
[email protected]:17... and I am going to have to examine the imagery in your comment more closely.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 02:22 PM --
You'll put your eye out, kid.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 02:30 PM
According to Tammy Bruce the head of the IDC is a big contributor to Slick. Hard to spin Bosnia and Kosovo as being "up with Christianity" moments. I'm sensing a large disconnect here.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 12, 2014 at 02:32 PM
Even the Kurds who are overwhelmingly muslims and from whose ranks Saladin sprang largely support Israel so it seems unlikely to me more than a minority, and probably a small one, of ME Christians are hostile to Israel.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 02:32 PM
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | September 12, 2014 at 02:32 PM
Doesn't Gmax have a poll of how many rank and file Maronites, Copts and Assyrians support a Jewish state?
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 02:34 PM
I've been waiting for NK to apologize for that crap sandwich he posted nearly an hour ago, but since none is forthcoming I think I'll take a break from here.
Posted by: Some Guy | September 12, 2014 at 02:36 PM
My hovercraft is full of eels.
Indeed. To which I'd add:
Earn more sessions by sleeving.
Posted by: AliceH | September 12, 2014 at 02:37 PM
Hey, daddy, I was looking for a shot of the Playtex 18-Hour trademark. Lifts and separates!
Posted by: cathyf | September 12, 2014 at 02:37 PM
Ignatz-- based on your comments you're a soulful and thoughtful Christian. A few weeks back you commeted about how it may be unchristian of us to discuss luxury goods or activities when there is so much want in the world. A fair point, but I'm sure it did not meet with universal agreement, who's view on what is an isn't christian is univerally accepted. But I thought you made your point respectfully and in a thought provoking way to people who know you. Walkng into a room filled with strangers from a very different part of the world and lecturing them about what Christ demands of us is a very different thing.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 02:38 PM
Walkng into a room filled with strangers from a very different part of the world and lecturing them about what Christ demands of us is a very different thing.
Surely no priest has ever done it.
Posted by: Extraneus | September 12, 2014 at 02:43 PM
--A few weeks back you commeted about how it may be unchristian of us to discuss luxury goods or activities when there is so much want in the world.....
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 02:38 PM--
IIRC, I knew not what course others may take but for me personally I struggled with the issue.
Likewise when Cruz made his remarks a soulful, thoughtful Christian would have considered the plank in his own eye before booing down the mote at the microphone.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 02:44 PM
Everybody's jumping on the Slatter Train:
http://minx.cc:1080/?post=351741
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 12, 2014 at 02:44 PM
American Conservative, big fans of Putin, before
the Crimean interventions,
Posted by: narciso | September 12, 2014 at 02:45 PM
As Mr. Cruz should have done in preparing his remarks.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 02:47 PM
Douthat most recently relativizing the Rotherdam rapes, I guess he was getting his stinger fitted,
Posted by: narciso | September 12, 2014 at 02:47 PM
models of equality and pluralism in the region, such as Lebanon and Jordan.
From wiki;
"While Christianity is a recognized religion and non-Muslim citizens may profess and practice the Christian faith, churches must be accorded legal recognition through administrative procedures in order to own land and administer sacraments, including marriage. Churches and other religious institutions can receive official recognition by applying to the Prime Ministry. The Prime Minister unofficially confers with an interfaith council of clergy representing officially registered local churches on all matters relating to the Christian community, including the registration of new churches. The Government refers to the following criteria when considering official recognition of Christian churches: the faith must not contradict the nature of the Constitution, public ethics, customs, or traditions; it must be recognized by the Middle East Council of Churches; the faith must not oppose the national religion; and the group must include some citizen adherents. Groups that the Government deems to engage in practices that violate the law and the nature of society or threaten the stability of public order are prohibited; however, there were no reports of banned religious groups. The Government does not interfere with public worship by the country's Christian minority."
And;
" Because Shari'a governs the personal status of Muslims, converting from Islam to Christianity and proselytism of Muslims are not allowed. Muslims who convert to another religion face societal and governmental discrimination. Under Shari'a, converts are regarded as apostates and may be denied their civil and property rights."
Jordan, a model of equality.
Posted by: Bori | September 12, 2014 at 02:48 PM
or if his views are irreconcilable to the group, he should have politely declined their invitation.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 02:49 PM
According to the president of the group, only a few didn't share his views.
Posted by: Sue | September 12, 2014 at 02:56 PM
Hey Cruz, there are a few in here that hate Jews so temper your message to fit their view, m'kay?
Posted by: Sue | September 12, 2014 at 02:58 PM
Just recalling this:
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
Posted by: MarkO | September 12, 2014 at 02:58 PM
Here's the nub of it to me NK.
Christ knows no national boundaries nor ethnicities and neither should our faith in Him.
If a Christian's faith doesn't even transcend his politics, his prejudices and his regionalism then it can't be much of a faith and I don't much care if it is offended anymore than I would have cared if a church going slaveowner was offended by abolitionists speaking the truth.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 02:58 PM
CH, was the title of this thread TM taking a subtle shot at your Youtube link last night? ;)
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | September 12, 2014 at 03:02 PM
Cruz said: "If you hate the Jewish people you are not reflecting the teachings of Christ."
That seems so orthodox and accepted I truly cannot see the offense or the controversy.
But - I'm no expert. Is there another view on what Christ taught about hating a whole people? Did Christ perhaps teach it was okay to THINK IT but just not SAY IT OUT LOUD in certain groups?
Posted by: AliceH | September 12, 2014 at 03:02 PM
--As Mr. Cruz should have done in preparing his remarks.
Posted by: NK | September 12, 2014 at 02:47 PM --
The verse immediately succeeding the mote and the plank, implores us to first makes sure we have removed our own plank so we can see clearly to remove our neighbor's mote.
In telling them the truth I'd say Cruz followed the instructions to a tittle.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 03:03 PM
LOL, but probably not Dave.
Now if it had been "The guys who dropped a drawer full of silverware", maybe.
Posted by: Ignatz | September 12, 2014 at 03:05 PM
I doubt it, Dave; I'm still struggling to deal with Janet's comments. I was expecting some of the usual suspects to weigh in with slings and arrows but JANET??
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 12, 2014 at 03:05 PM
After six years, our president is starting to learn how to be president. Just needs another six years.
Posted by: jorod | September 12, 2014 at 03:08 PM
Well which is it?
Small vocal and rude minority
majority whose views are irreconcilable with the stated Israel being a friend and ally of Christians
You are veering off into Dreher land it would appear to me.
Posted by: GMax | September 12, 2014 at 03:09 PM