MIT conducted and released a student survey of sexual assault, so Richard Perez-Pena of the NY Times seized the moment to advance the agenda:
Rare Survey Examines Sexual Assault at M.I.T.
In a rare, detailed look at sexual assault and harassment on a university campus, M.I.T. revealed Monday that among undergraduates who replied to a survey, at least 17 percent of women and 5 percent of men said they had been sexually assaulted.
Is that what the undergraduates said? In a word, no; the "17" and "5" figures are what the poll takers thought the students should have said. Reading down to paragraphs ten and eleven we find a clarification:
M.I.T. asked about several forms of unwanted sexual contact, from touching to penetration, “involving use of force, physical threat or incapacitation,” that it said clearly constituted sexual assault — the kind that 17 percent of undergraduate women and 5 percent of undergraduate men said they had experienced. In addition, 12 percent of women and 6 percent of men said they had experienced the same kinds of unwanted sexual contact, but without force, threat or incapacity — some of which, depending on the circumstances, can also be sexual assault.
Yet when asked if they had been raped or sexually assaulted, only 11 percent of female and 2 percent of male undergraduates said yes.
If the lead had been changed to "17 percent of women and 5 percent of men reported an experience that meets a widely accepted definition of sexual assault" we would be closer to the truth but further from a scary lead.
Obviously, even 11 and 2 is unacceptably high. The survey went out to all students and had a 35% response rate, which led to an unimaginative caveat:
M.I.T. asked all of its nearly 11,000 graduate and undergraduate students to take the survey, and about 35 percent did so. Dr. Barnhart cautioned that it was not possible to say how different the results would have been if everyone had taken part.
Of course we can determine a range if all students had taken part. Imagine that of the 2/3 who did not respond, none had any inkling of having been sexually assaulted. Then the overall self-reported assualt rate for women would be 4%, and for men, 0.7%. (That does not adjust for the different reporting rates by gender and undergrad/grad, which is detailed in the survey results; undergrad women had a 46% response rate.)
Or if all non-respondents had been assualted (and were not comfortable revisiting that experience), the upper limits would be 88% for women and 68% for men.
That is a big range with an utterly improbable upper limit, but the lower limit is interesting. If we take 4% as an accurate self-reported assault rate for women, how does that fit into the many articles that have debunked the 20% figure tossed around by Team Obama et al? But do keep in mind - the 20% figure contemplates a woman's entire college career; the MIT survey included underclassman who may have been lucky so far. [A VERY rudimentary calculation based on the dubious notions that the probability of assault and the rate of reporting are constant over four years suggests that the overall self-reported rate of 11% across all four classes is consistent with 95% of freshmen, 90.25% of sophomores, 86% of juniors and 81% of seniors avoiding assault (i.e., a 5% annual assault rate). That means ON AVERAGE across four classes 11% have been assaulted but that 19% of seniors have experienced assault. That jibes nicely with the commonly cited 20%.]
As to reporting, the survey found this:
Of those who had experienced unwanted sexual contact, most said they had told a friend, but only 5 percent said they had reported it to any campus official. When asked why, more than half said that they did not think it was serious enough to report and that no harm was intended, and nearly half said they thought they were partly at fault.
The Administration has been promoting a 12% figure. Mark Perry of AEI has studied this arithmetic and the Administration figures don't gel. Lacking specific reporting figures for MIT I can't attempt to recreate his work. But the day is young!
Finally, the faculty still has a lot of work to do in brainwashing educating their students:
Large numbers of undergraduates, male and female, also agreed with statements suggesting that blame for the assault did not always rest exclusively with the aggressor. Two-thirds agreed that “rape and sexual assault can happen unintentionally, especially if alcohol is involved”; one-third said it can happen “because men get carried away”; about one in five said it often happened because the victim was not clear enough about refusing; and a similar number said that a drunk victim was “at least somewhat responsible.”
Such views were less prevalent among graduate students, as was sexual assault itself.
Dr. Foubert said he considered many of those responses a form of “excusing the perpetrator and blaming the victim,” and was very concerned about it.
I say "common sense and personal responsibility", they say "blaming the victim".
SOME NUMBERS: From a Boston Globe survey of reported assaults at Boston-area schools we glean this:
Sexual assaults on Boston-area college campuses, by rate per 1,000 students
MIT: 11,189 students; 1.07% rate in 2012 (up from 0.63% in 2011).
From US News & World Report I see that MIT has about 4,500 undergrads and is about 55% male. Reaching back to 2008 I fiond this in the MIT paper:
At MIT, women comprise 1885 of 4153 undergraduates (45.4 percent) and 1907 of 6146 graduate students (31 percent). MIT has about 50 percent more graduate students than undergraduates, but only about two dozen more graduate student women than undergraduate women.
Hmm. The Globe has assault reporting for undergards and grads combined, which is not what we want.
Me again?
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 28, 2014 at 10:05 AM
AT MIT it could be robots doing naughty things.
Posted by: henry | October 28, 2014 at 10:11 AM
The missing question is who is doing these assaults? Same sex or opposite?
Posted by: henry | October 28, 2014 at 10:13 AM
It's the lack of the electron microscopes necessary to identify the evidence that will prove every student - male and female - to have been victims of nanorape. I suggest a complete quarantine for four years (32 years for Ivy League schools).
It may prove necessary to raze the schools and salt the earth where they stood. I'm very willing to volunteer for such a project.
Posted by: RickB | October 28, 2014 at 10:19 AM
fifth!
Posted by: matt | October 28, 2014 at 10:20 AM
If I were at all interested in the truth of this, I'd start with this: "among undergraduates who replied to a survey."
It is an invalid survey.
Posted by: MarkO | October 28, 2014 at 10:21 AM
I still remember asking my uncle who went there telling me that in the 5th semester calc class there they invented new theorems. Seemed traumatic to me but he was psyched.
I did not like my one and only semester. Cruel use of 8AM spring semester Freshman year. Much more fun to learn to spike watermelons and frisbee golf.
Posted by: rse | October 28, 2014 at 10:24 AM
Henry, as a tech guy I know you see how close the industry is to accomplishing just what you say in your 10:11.
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 28, 2014 at 10:27 AM
MarkO,
That is the problem with all surveys and polls. They are trying to draw correlations based on small samples.
Polls try to address this but surveys are especially difficult because many ignore them while those apt to answer the survey may be more motivated to do so.
Posted by: Bori | October 28, 2014 at 10:31 AM
The NYT is textual assault.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | October 28, 2014 at 10:33 AM
OL, the Japanese are way ahead of MIT on that particular application (at least publically).
Posted by: henry | October 28, 2014 at 10:34 AM
I say "common sense and personal responsibility", they say "blaming the victim"
And I say “Big Data Bullsh*t”™ or "BDB"™ because such statistical evidence is political fodder while individual evidence points to a crime.
Sexual assault statistics are used as a political tool to push identity group special legislation. Real sexual assault to an individual is, and ought to be, a crime that applies to anyone, anytime, anywhere.
Progs should be careful what they want to legislate because a law can just as easily turn back on them, and then where will they hide.
Posted by: sbw | October 28, 2014 at 10:35 AM
The deliberate misinterpretation of civil rights laws continues since it is easier than amendment or gaining a judicial majority. http://www.otlcampaign.org/sites/default/files/civil-rights-letter-10_27_14.pdf is letter that went out today that civil rights laws require all students be educated equitably.
Only sel is equitable. Not a mention of the Common Core either, but 21st century skills and deep learning make it.
Posted by: rse | October 28, 2014 at 10:37 AM
I know that, Henry. It will be the final nail in Japan's demographic coffin.
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 28, 2014 at 10:38 AM
OL-- Japanese demographics and pleasure robots. There will be fewer Japanese... but happier Japanese.
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | October 28, 2014 at 10:40 AM
New WaPo/ABC generic ballot: R+6.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2014/10/28/National-Politics/Polling/release_371.xml
So we have WSJ/NBC R+11 and WaPo/ABC R+6. On the flip side, CNN has D+1 and Ras has R+2.
Here's the thing, though: unlike 2012, it's not a national election. Most of the critical Senate races are in Romney states. What do you suppose the generic ballot looks like in the battleground states? Interesting that no one is telling us, huh?
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 10:41 AM
Two robots one cup.
Posted by: Beasts of England | October 28, 2014 at 10:45 AM
NK, given China's gender imbalance it may be an excellent export market for Japan. Fewer, happier, and richer Japanese.
Posted by: henry | October 28, 2014 at 10:46 AM
My father instilled in me the ethic that one didn't take advantage of a vulnerable lady (vulnerable whether due to booze or drugs or whatever) because it is unmanly to do so. I realize that ethic would be met today with derision not only by so-called feminists, but also by men with supposed "game". But the reality is that this ethic is the one that would best address this issue.
As for women, the notion that advising a woman to watch herself at parties and while out and about is blaming the victim is so preposterous on its face that I would think that "elite" academic and coastal and media prog gentries are the only ones who could be so stupid as to hold this view.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | October 28, 2014 at 10:46 AM
Interesting that no one is telling us, huh?
Yeah...I've thought that too. I posted that I was polled in early Oct. by Quinnipiac on the Virginia election. No poll results posted yet though. I keep looking.
the last poll results posted were from Sept.
Posted by: Janet | October 28, 2014 at 10:49 AM
Porch:
I want to thank you for your optimistic polling updates.
I am nervous like Janet and JamesD. but determined to stay upbeat.
I believe we will win the Senate but that Georgia will go to a run-off.Best case for us because dems will be discouraged that they have already lost the Senate. I just don't see Perdue at this point getting to 50%.
I think the sleeper races are New Hampshire and Virginia.
NC could go either way but I am relying on HIt to give us the straight scoop. In any event -we are in for a long night. I am encouraged by Walker. He has managed to fight back the progs and I believe dems are trying to depress the vote by repubs by pretending Burke is already a winner.
As for henry and Walker-I say -once more into the breach...
Posted by: maryrose | October 28, 2014 at 10:50 AM
--unwanted sexual contact, from touching to penetration, “involving use of force".......When asked why, more than half said that they did not think it was serious enough to report and that no harm was intended, and nearly half said they thought they were partly at fault.--
So how exactly do they define "use of force"? More than half seem to think sexual assault is something other than the survey guys do. Seems like the old pastime of trying to get to second base is being criminalized.
Reminds me of the old Tubes song;
Don't Touch Me There
Posted by: Iggy | October 28, 2014 at 10:53 AM
ThomasC@10:46-- did you play the Pinto character in the Animal House movie?
As to your second point. I guess I should admire my daughter's outspoken common sense on that issue. She starts with the assumption that all of today's young men are unmanly, until individual ones she meets prove otherwise.
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | October 28, 2014 at 10:53 AM
I think the battleground states are an un-nerving picture for the dems. They are scared to death to post any negative polling there for fear of depressing the already low dem turnout.
HIT;
I will say this about dem early turn-out in NC. Perhaps on election day it gives the republicans a better idea of how many votes will be needed to beat them I anticipate Heavy repub voting on Election day itself.
Posted by: maryrose | October 28, 2014 at 10:54 AM
Two robots one cup.
Gear oil. Ew.
Posted by: Eric in Boise | October 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM
Mookie Blaylock; three years in prison for killing a mother of five in head on collision.
Posted by: Iggy | October 28, 2014 at 11:00 AM
That WaPo/ABC poll above linked by Porch above tells us this:
In nine states with competitive Senate races, voters express a preference for voting for the Republican in the House election by a margin of 57 percent to 39 percent.
They don't tell us the nine states but we can get pretty close just guessing. And this poll starts out with a D + 8 adult sample and gets down to D + 3 at likely voter. I think the odds of this election being a D + 3 election are close to zero, but that explains the wildly divergent end results. Just take away from this one that Independents are breaking to Republicans by about a 2 to 1 margin, which more than overcomes their D + 3 sample...
Posted by: GMax | October 28, 2014 at 11:04 AM
The New Republic continues to impress with its stunningly stupid writers as one of the party of "Macaca" and "real rape" decries the GOP's "reliance" on gaffes as political fodder, regarding the horselaughs over Hillary's jobs comment the other day.
Posted by: Iggy | October 28, 2014 at 11:04 AM
You're welcome, maryrose. I am nervous too. The polling shows modest GOP leads in nearly every important race, but we just don't know what the margins are going to look like or what the Dem fraud machines are going to be able to do.
Janet, that is weird about the Quinny poll. Spotty polling is disappointing. IMO we have a ton of IA, CO, NH, and NC polling in October because those are the tightest races and the ones the Dems have the most chance of saving. But most people would not have put IA or CO on that list a few months ago - they'd probably have guessed AR or LA instead.
It's going to be a nailbiter. I think we can pick up 7 seats on Tuesday (MT SD WV AR CO IA AK) and hold KS and KY if we have a good night, and GA and LA will go to runoff.
NC or NH would be a major bonus. They are both neck and neck so it could happen, but coin flips are nervewracking.
With the IL gov race being so tight, could it be possible there will be fewer Cook Countians available for bus travel to WI?
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 11:05 AM
I agree with Reince Priebus on this one;
Hillary Clinton not really good at politics.
Posted by: Iggy | October 28, 2014 at 11:08 AM
Good catch GMax! I like those numbers.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 11:11 AM
Porch, Cook County runs tour buses with many stops. Plenty of time for multiple votes in multiple states.
Posted by: henry | October 28, 2014 at 11:11 AM
I was afraid of that, henry.
I was born in Cook County. What an embarrassment.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 11:11 AM
--With the IL gov race being so tight, could it be possible there will be fewer Cook Countians available for bus travel to WI?--
Porch, Porch, Porch; with today's efficient and comfortable motor coaches it is mere child's play to vote in IL in the morning, head up the road to WI midday, and be back in Chitown for the evening vote.
Posted by: Iggy | October 28, 2014 at 11:12 AM
Curses.
Posted by: Iggy | October 28, 2014 at 11:12 AM
I think we could usefully apply RickB's formula as laid out @ 10:19 - four year quarantine, followed by ground-razing and earth-salting - to the New Republic. And the NYT. And the WaPo. And everything within a radius of, say, 50 miles of wherever Vox is based out of (it's the only way to be sure).
Posted by: James D. | October 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM
The New Republic continues to impress with its stunningly stupid writers
For people who continually contemplate their navels, the Children of the Cornhole are stunningly lacking in self awareness.
Btw Levin was skewering Fat RINO Bastard for his torpedo job on Walker.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 28, 2014 at 11:20 AM
Just in case someone doubts that the WaPo poll has as start a D + 8 adult sample, here is the response to the question, "Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a..."
Democrat
32
Republican
24
Independent
36
Other
5
No opinion
3
Posted by: GMax | October 28, 2014 at 11:20 AM
Porchlight, what are you thinking? EARLY AND OFTEN.
And bless you Thomas Collins.
Posted by: aged lurker | October 28, 2014 at 11:21 AM
Let's quantify our predictions, shall we?
Beasts predicts:
Senate: 52-R
House: 243-R
Posted by: Beasts of England | October 28, 2014 at 11:24 AM
Monkey island flinging poo again, this time at each other! Laugh outloud, this was the great Senate pick up hope about 2 weeks ago:
Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Rick Weiland accused his own political party of trying to undermine his campaign in a striking news conference Monday.
Weiland said the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's ads attacking Republican incumbent Mike Rounds have backfired and hurt him.
"You put negative on a candidate and you put your disclosure at the bottom that says 'Paid for by the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee,' the Democratic candidate's going to get blamed for that," Weiland said.
But Weiland went a step further and said this wasn't just an inadvertent side effect of the negative ads. He said it was deliberate — an attempt to sabotage him and boost independent Larry Pressler.
"My national party — that I'm a member of — (was) trying to drive votes to Larry Pressler and trying to drive up my negatives," Weiland said.
A spokesman for the DSCC declined to comment on Weiland's charges.
Sound like a bitter disgruntled candidate about to get beat like a drum? Sure does to me...
Posted by: GMax | October 28, 2014 at 11:27 AM
I know, I know, but....enthusiasm, etc. Are the Cook Countians going to be showing up in the same numbers as past years? Dem youth vote is down across the board - AA, Hispanic, white etc.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 11:27 AM
Let's quantify our predictions, shall we?
Beer: 2 bph, accelerating as results come in
Hangover: cured by sight of progs in distress (worked wonders in recall).
Posted by: henry | October 28, 2014 at 11:28 AM
Are we talking Election Night, Beasts, or when it's all said and done in January (GA runoff)?
52-R Senate sounds right to me (post runoff). Hoping for better.
I'll go with 245-R in the House.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 11:29 AM
Porch, Cook County is a function of SEIU / AFL-CIO spending -- participants are paid to tour. Given the public vendetta vs Walker, that spending will be higher than usual.
Posted by: henry | October 28, 2014 at 11:31 AM
Are young women turning into fragile flowers on campuses everywhere? I remember walking early one evening near Lake Mendota in Madison. Two men and a women approached from the opposite direction. One of the men reached out and grabbed my breasts and then continued walking away. I turned around and though he was considerably larger than I , I pounded him on the back hard with my fists, leaving him sore and embarrassed in front of his friends.
Posted by: clarice | October 28, 2014 at 11:35 AM
Don't worry about the Senate races. Kevin McCarthy plans on passing a budget deal during the lame duck session in some wonderful GOPe strategery:
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2014/10/kevin-mccarthy-has-some-soggy-white-bread-for-you
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 28, 2014 at 11:35 AM
Good point, Porch! I was predicting election night. The Peach State would be 53 in my calculus.
Posted by: Beasts of England | October 28, 2014 at 11:36 AM
>>>50 miles of wherever Vox is based<<<
Dupont Circle ... YIKES!!!
afternoon all.
Posted by: rich@gmu | October 28, 2014 at 11:38 AM
BoE -- 53 Senate? pray God you're right, God willing Hagan and Nunn both lose and HildaBeast's old white lady Lib project is stopped cold.
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | October 28, 2014 at 11:40 AM
Oh dear, Cap'n - I can't worry about that now.
henry, I know the money will be there, I'm just wondering how many will line up for it. Yeah, it's money, but sometimes money isn't enough get Pookie off the couch.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 11:41 AM
Coming attraction?
TOKYO—Japan has joined a small group of countries in which investors are in the unusual position of actually paying the government to lend it money—a situation brought on by ultra-easy monetary policies that have flipped bond investing on its head by pushing yields into negative territory.
Posted by: GMax | October 28, 2014 at 11:41 AM
It's afternoon somewhere, rich. :)
Posted by: Iggy | October 28, 2014 at 11:43 AM
@NK: Other than my tip the other night re: LSU, I'm awful at predictions. What I see is plenty of apathy from the LIVs, some real anger at the current administration, polls that are insanely weighted for the left, and a rather complete failure of all the usual prog memes, e.g., war on wymynz, race hustling, minimum wage.
We'll see, said the blind man.
Posted by: Beasts of England | October 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM
No, Porch, it shouldn't change anybody's voting but it's a quick heads up on what can be expected from the tone deaf GOPe. Kevin McCarthy's existence as House majority leader was a slap in the face for the people who overwhelmingly sent Cantor packing so this coming from him shouldn't be unexpected.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM
Rich, is that where they're based?
I guess the 50 mile radius would get me and Janet and clarice, too.
Still, it'd almost be worth it...
Posted by: James D. | October 28, 2014 at 11:54 AM
As a Liberal, I absolutely loved the fact that we were able to frighten the shit out of Gov. Christ Christie to such a a degree he had to turn tail and run like a little french girl that had her pigtails pulled.
Yeah,that's strong and decisive leadership if ever I saw it.
This is why i'm a Democrat. The ability to bully power full people into doing what the heck you want them to do.
Apparently,what happened was Christie heard Rachel Maddow was doing a segment on Christie's locking up of an non-ebola carrier and butterball rang MSNBC and begged the Maddow show to leave him alone. They said no,butterball shit his pants and turned tail and ran.
Whose next?????
Posted by: Dublindave | October 28, 2014 at 11:56 AM
51-49 Senate, GOP picks nets plus 5 in House. I'm hoping on Nov. 5th there will be reason to mock me for timidity.
The girls I grew up with, clarice, would have been less polite. The pounding would have taken place in a part of the gent's anatomy different from the back.
I wasn't introduced to the notion of fragile girls until high school and college. The middle school gals I grew up with scared the daylights out of the guys, including the guys who became Mafia "security" types.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | October 28, 2014 at 11:59 AM
Here's the actual McCarthy memo.
I didn't see where he called for a lame duck budget, CH.
Will they disappoint? Yes.
Will there come sufficient grass roots pressure for them to disappoint less than we fear? We'll see.
Posted by: Iggy | October 28, 2014 at 12:00 PM
--Whose next?????--
Your next!!!!!
BTW, most here agree with you on Christie, WeeDavey. Welcome to the club.
Posted by: Iggy | October 28, 2014 at 12:02 PM
JamesD-
Klein's operation is ... his group is part of a few hundred internet media properties ... brought to you by Koz and Armstrong. Think I saw Klein over at Tyson's a few weeks back.
now it is the afternoon! too early, I still want to be in bed.
Posted by: rich@gmu | October 28, 2014 at 12:05 PM
Seemed traumatic to me but he was psyched.
rse, MIT had a very high suicide rate back in the day. Sometime around 1980 they decided to address that by encouraging more student life beyond the classroom. I think they succeeded, but it surprises me how lefty it is, considering the engineering core, but I suspect that's mainly the faculty (Chomsky et al) and administration.
Posted by: jimmyk | October 28, 2014 at 12:05 PM
Good god, even a good prog like Lippmann would be embarassed, at what Croley's cribsheet has become,
Rupert's Gazette, as well as Carlos Slim's is most dissapointing except at the Op Ed page, with few exceptions,
Posted by: narciso | October 28, 2014 at 12:05 PM
ThomasC-- the middle school girls were in Providence, no? So fear makes perfect sense.
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | October 28, 2014 at 12:06 PM
Mega Boom
SUSA out with a new Ga Poll:
Perdue 48%
Nunn 45%
This is a major reversal from their last poll of two weeks ago, where they had Nunn + 2.
Posted by: GMax | October 28, 2014 at 12:06 PM
Man, that's great, GMax.
I might have to get a hotel room Tuesday night so I can watch returns in peace. My kids will never leave me alone. Last time I had a peaceful (and happy) Election Night was 2004 when my oldest was a baby asleep in her crib.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 12:09 PM
Beutler, must be on Hagan's staff:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/gop-senate-candidate-called-uncle-tom-hillaryhagan-rally-nc_817656.html?nopager=1
Posted by: narciso | October 28, 2014 at 12:09 PM
I'll never catch up, but I had strange dream last night.
I dreamed that days before a critical election, Chris Christie injected himself into the zeitgeist, and unwittingly provided cover for the White House.
Whew, good thing I woke up...
Posted by: Some Guy | October 28, 2014 at 12:11 PM
Here you go, Iggy:
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-10-27/a-nonsensical-republican-budget-plan
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 28, 2014 at 12:11 PM
Ugh, Some Guy. Christie is just awful.
If it's true he's sabotaging Walker I will be hard pressed to vote for him even in the general (should the worst happen and he wins the nomination).
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 12:13 PM
Anyone think Weh has a chance against Tom Udall in NM? All ground reports from NM have the GOP surging.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/10/27/poll_weh_gaining_on_udall_in_nm_senate_race_124455.html
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 12:15 PM
Nothing in McCarthy's turtle food can be converted to prog fodder by the MFM to frighten the Lackwitz LIVs with dystopian fantasies. He's staying on task and the clear soup followed by thin gruel diet isn't going to change until after the Senate majority reorganization in December.
Posted by: RickB | October 28, 2014 at 12:15 PM
The Peach State would be 53 in my calculus.
That would make me very happy.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 12:15 PM
Thank God this little twerp is convicted. Of course the Boston Jury took 4 days to do so: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/bombing-suspects-friend-convicted-of-lying-to-fbi/ar-BBbI0cO?ocid=iehp
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | October 28, 2014 at 12:16 PM
Porch probably not, but Martinez is going to win in a laugher and she might drag in enough voters to make it closer than generally thought...
Posted by: GMax | October 28, 2014 at 12:17 PM
Whew, good thing I woke up...
I don't see any hurricanes in the forecast for the east coast, so we're safe there.
On the McCarthy lame duck budget: Is there a scenario with an R House and Senate that a government shutdown could actually be blamed on Obama and the Dems? I guess the senate Ds can prevent passage by filibuster, but won't that be on them? I realize that everything is always the Republicans' fault, but this seems a bigger stretch for the MSM to pull off.
Posted by: jimmyk | October 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM
Kaci Hickox is in an "undisclosed location" somewhere in Maine.The media has staked out the house in Fort Kent,but there has been no activity there. The news anchor on the noon Portland TV news seemed annoyed to give any news about the nurse,nothing to see here,move along. By the way,Christie is coming to Maine this afternoon to campaign with Lepage. Good timing.
Posted by: Marlene | October 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM
Porchlight,
It'll be interesting to see if he learned anything from his stunts in '12. He was on the Today Show this morning and wasn't as awful as I expected, and a talented politician should be able to play this to our advantage (unless their ego gets in the way).
Posted by: Some Guy | October 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM
senate Ds can prevent passage by filibuster
NOPE cant filibuster a budget the reconciliation rules are controlling.
NYT/CBS via YouGov says Abortion Barbie losing women by double digits.
The boat is taking on water below the waterline. Mayday, Mayday, Mayday. LOL
Posted by: GMax | October 28, 2014 at 12:24 PM
Some Guy, I just think his ego is too out of control. He reminds me of someone my husband works with who always has to boot stomp others in his quest for glory. He can't help himself.
GMax, I think you're right. Too bad. Weh seems like a good guy if not the strongest candidate.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 12:24 PM
I can't wait to see the final numbers on the Davis loss. Many sad prog faces in Austin next week.
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 12:25 PM
Yeah I read that yesterday CH and it links to a Politico story I linked concerning McCarthy a day or two ago.
Problem is it's the Politico guy who says McCarthy wants to pass a lame duck budget, not McCarthy himself. McCarthy is quoted as saying;
which doesn't sound like the same thing.
An actual quote could change my mind and while I believe there are few if any limits to GOP stupidity I believe the same thing about "journalists' " mendacity.
BTW I'm also unconvinced there are any limits to the tedious, hair splitting nature of most of Ponnuru's columns.
Posted by: Iggy | October 28, 2014 at 12:28 PM
no one bothers to read their own copy of Carlos Slim's
http://patterico.com/2014/10/28/new-york-times-doctor-in-nyc-was-not-symptomatic-new-york-times-doctor-in-nyc-was-symptomatic/#comment-1702296
Posted by: narciso | October 28, 2014 at 12:29 PM
I guess the senate Ds can prevent passage by filibuster, but won't that be on them?
Therein lies the problem. McCarthy wants to use this as a way to prove that "we can govern" but the only way to do that is pass something that is a prog's fantasy list. Unless this is multi dimensional chess by having the next year Senate pass it and 404 veto it which puts it back in the same situation. The only way he can prove they can govern is by bending over on everything.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 28, 2014 at 12:29 PM
NOPE cant filibuster a budget the reconciliation rules are controlling.
Then a shutdown would be on Obama. R House and Senate pass a budget, Obama vetoes, government shuts down. So I'm baffled by the attempt to pass a lame-duck budget. What am I missing?
Posted by: jimmyk | October 28, 2014 at 12:31 PM
Didn't see iggy's and CH's posts. So it's the Politico fabulists I didn't take into account. I hope it's that and not the R 'bend over' reflex.
Posted by: jimmyk | October 28, 2014 at 12:33 PM
See the quote Iggy posted. I see nothing that says lame duck budget. Unless there is more, I will default to Politico being Democrats for Democrats and willing to make stuff up at will
Posted by: GMax | October 28, 2014 at 12:34 PM
jimmyk,
The changes made in Senate rules in December will determine whether the government shutdown BS is allowed to continue. We won't have any clear idea concerning whether a unified strategy for increasing the velocity of the broomstick and guiding it directly to the teepee exists until then.
I'll admit that "Go Turtles" is never going to be my favorite cheer it's been, IMO, the correct strategy while this President continues his application of the Merde Touch to the detriment of his party.
Posted by: RickB | October 28, 2014 at 12:35 PM
I'm sure there are some in local races but can anybody remember a worse candidate for a major office than Wendy Davis? Her campaign has just been a series of trainwrecks that each by itself should sink her.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 28, 2014 at 12:35 PM
To Govern is too chose, to discriminate in priorities, how do they not understand this?
Posted by: narciso | October 28, 2014 at 12:35 PM
I had the priviledge back in 1996 of being a guest lecturer in Mega-Project Management at the Civil Engineering graduate school at MIT for 6 sessions and a seminar over 3 days. Of course, all that resulted in was me getting a nice granite paperweight with the MIT insignia and every students CV for future employment possibilities.
I have seen better student life amenities in a YMCA'. The cafeteria was very ordinary and the bookstore extremely blah.
That said the overall intellect and inquiry was world class. Those kids weren't going to be flipping burgers but making the robots that will in the future.
For a great fictional account of the founding of MIT I suggest Mathew Pearl's "The Technologists". A terrific read.
Posted by: Jack is Back | October 28, 2014 at 12:37 PM
Just remember, it ain't over till it's over.
I will vote and then probably go to bed without watching. After the promise of Romney in '12 fell flat on its face somewhere around 6:00PM PDT I have my doubts.
The level of stupidity and mendacity is at an all time high.
Posted by: matt | October 28, 2014 at 12:38 PM
that candidate in S. Carolina, of course, the grizzled Ewok would disagree.
I think it was Jamie Dupree on Herman Cain's radio show, that noted the relative undercount of Republicans v. Democrats and Independents in the early vote in N. Carolina,
Posted by: narciso | October 28, 2014 at 12:39 PM
""My national party — that I'm a member of — (was) trying to drive votes to Larry Pressler and trying to drive up my negatives,"
How could anyone drive up the negatives of a Democrat politician? They already have every negative there is.
--------------------------------------------------
Here's some thing good for NC voters.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/10/elbert_guillory_strikes_again_comments.html
Check the comments for a comment from "Antoninus".it is the 7th one down right now sorted by best. It offers the best explanation I have heard for how the Blacks got suckered into voting for the party that has always treated them the worse.
Posted by: Pagar | October 28, 2014 at 12:40 PM
Looks like more former senior administration officials are piling on Obama for his screwups in Iraq and Syria. Frontline will be airing their opinions tonight. Even PBS is deserting him.
Posted by: matt | October 28, 2014 at 12:42 PM
Nevada through Monday. Based on 2010 vote totals, about 30% of voters have now voted:
Rep 46.2%
Dem 37.7%
Oth 17.1%
Posted by: GMax | October 28, 2014 at 12:42 PM
Why shouldn't the House pass a short continuing resolution in November? What purpose would be served by doing otherwise?
Posted by: RickB | October 28, 2014 at 12:47 PM
Wow, matt - Frontline.
GMax, those are great numbers. I think almost 40% of the CO ballots are in as well. GOP still leading by registration:
Oct 28: 778k ballots returned
42.7% R
32.2% D
Posted by: Porchlight | October 28, 2014 at 12:47 PM
And Colorado:
CO Early Voting update.
Rep 331,723 (42.7%)
Dem 250,841 (32.2%)
Oth 195,047 (25.1%)
This is most likely around 37% of the final vote count, again based on 2010.
Posted by: GMax | October 28, 2014 at 12:48 PM
I'm trying to think who Wendy Davis would appeal to and the only people I can think of are losers who hate men, children, handicapped people and particularly successful people.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 28, 2014 at 12:49 PM